**Tinnitus and Noise Induced Hearing Loss**

98 Up to Date on Tinnitus

[75] Johnson LN, Krohel GB, Madsen RW, March GA, Jr. The role of weight loss and

[76] Bryce GE, Morrison MD. Botulinum toxin treatment of essential palatal myoclonus

[77] Orlandi RR, Shelton C. Endoscopic closure of the eustachian tube. American journal of

[78] Sato T, Kawase T, Yano H, Suetake M, Kobayashi T. Trans-tympanic silicone plug

[79] Bauer CA, Brozoski TJ. Effect of gabapentin on the sensation and impact of tinnitus. The

[80] Piccirillo JF, Finnell J, Vlahiotis A, Chole RA, Spitznagel E, Jr. Relief of idiopathic

[81] Johnson RM, Brummett R, Schleuning A. Use of alprazolam for relief of tinnitus. A

[82] Jalali MM, Kousha A, Naghavi SE, Soleimani R, Banan R. The effects of alprazolam on

[83] Sullivan M, Katon W, Russo J, Dobie R, Sakai C. A randomized trial of nortriptyline for

[84] Dobie RA, Sakai CS, Sullivan MD, Katon WJ, Russo J. Antidepressant treatment of

[85] De Ridder D. Should rTMS for tinnitus be performed left-sided, ipsilaterally or

[86] Meeus OM, De Ridder D, Van de Heyning PH. Transcranial magnetic stimulation

[87] Khedr EM, Rothwell JC, El-Atar A. One-year follow up of patients with chronic tinnitus treated with left temporoparietal rTMS. Eur J Neurol. 2009 Mar;16(3):404-8. [88] Andersson G, Lyttkens L. A meta-analytic review of psychological treatments for

Archives of internal medicine. 1993 Oct 11;153(19):2251-9.

(TMS) in tinnitus patients. B-ENT. 2009;5(2):89-100.

benefit. The American journal of otology. 1993 Jan;14(1):18-23.

tinnitus. British journal of audiology. 1999 Aug;33(4):201-10.

(pseudotumor cerebri). Ophthalmology. 1998 Dec;105(12):2313-7.

tinnitus. The Journal of otolaryngology. 1998 Aug;27(4):213-6.

rhinology. 2004 Nov-Dec;18(6):363-5.

Laryngoscope. 2006 May;116(5):675-81.

neck surgery. 2007 Apr;133(4):390-7.

Nov;125(11):1158-63.

Aug;119(8):842-5.

Nov;15(11):PI55-60.

Jul;17(7):891-2.

acetazolamide in the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension

insertion for chronic patulous Eustachian tube. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2005

subjective tinnitus: is gabapentin effective? Archives of otolaryngology--head &

double-blind study. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 1993

tinnitus: a cross-over randomized clinical trial. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2009

severe chronic tinnitus. Effects on depression, disability, and tinnitus symptoms.

tinnitus patients: report of a randomized clinical trial and clinical prediction of

contralaterally, and is it a treatment or merely investigational? Eur J Neurol. 2010

P.H. Dejonckere

*Belgium* 

**Medico-Legal Decision Making** 

*Federal Institute of Occupational Diseases, Brussels, Dept. of Neurosciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven,* 

In clinical practice, tinnitus is a quite common symptom in patients with chronic acoustic trauma, and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). A review of the current state of knowledge on tinnitus in relation to noise exposure and hearing loss has been recently (Poole, 2010) published by the UK Health & Safety Executive. 252 publications were reviewed. The prevalence of tinnitus in populations exposed to noise at work is reported to be between 5,9% and 87,5%. Factors such as the type of subjects (e.g. health surveillance, compensation claimant), the characteristics of the noise exposure and the definition of tinnitus used apparently contribute to this variability. Several publications have shown that the prevalence of tinnitus in workers exposed to noise at work is significantly higher than in non-exposed workers. The majority of the published papers support the idea that there is an association between tinnitus and noise-induced hearing loss: the prevalence of tinnitus in workers with NIHL appears to be higher, and the workers with tinnitus have more severe

In a medico-legal context, tinnitus is mostly a subsidiary item of claim, additional to that for noise-induced hearing loss. However, tinnitus may also be the principal or only complaint, e.g. in patients with a specific and selective noise-induced dip on 4 KHz but without obvious repercussion on their social hearing. Further, as in some cases tinnitus may cause devastating (and objectivable) effects on lifestyle and ability to work, it may attract higher

In such a medico-legal situation, when e.g. the patient claims compensation for an occupational disease, potential financial advantage may be a strong motivation for feigning or exaggeration. The essentially subjective nature of tinnitus renders it very difficult to make – at least in some patients - equitable medico-legal decision about presence and severity of tinnitus. This implies that assessment needs to involve a large set of parameters, combining

The proposed method for medicolegally evaluating tinnitus in context of NIHL is based on a rational, echeloned progression in decision making: at each step, a quite large number of elementary (cellular) decisions, easy to make and reproducible among different experts, leads to the higher decision level. Four of such levels are worked out and formulated, with respectively 65, 12, 4 and 1 decisions. The final decision is then: accept or reject the tinnitus as a true component of the occupational disorder ( noise-induced cochlear damage ).

levels of compensation than hearing loss (Coles, 2000).

subjective with objective items (Nieschalk & Stoll, 2002).

**1. Introduction** 

NIHL.

**in NIHL-Related Tinnitus** 
