**5. Variant of putative test of intelligence: the factor structure of spearman**

**5.4 Where the energy comes from?**

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96324*

organization of energetic activity in the brain.

level; there is no information in a neuron.

**5.5 Brain energy and oxygen metabolism**

directing brain plasticity and cognitive function.

**5.6 Link between mood states and creativity**

*Modified three stratum approach to C-H-C theory of intelligence.*

tinct component of creative thoughts.

**Figure 3**.

**Figure 3.**

**135**

Recent neuroscientific evidence suggests brain function is a product of the

*Quest for I (Intelligence) in AI (Artificial Intelligence): A Non-Elusive Attempt*

Dynamic metabolic changes occurring in neurons are critically important in

With dynamic changes in oxygen metabolism occurring during neuronal activity, dynamic changes are likely to be reflected in level of oxygen concentration, potentially having secondary effects on protein function and gene expression.

Creativity is a multifaceted construct, in which different moods influence dis-

Mood shifts are crucial in scaling creativity. The activating moods induce more

Based on the above discussion in Section 4, we state that the long-pending debates on g-factor of Spearman can be replaced by the new conjecture as follows:

• **Kumar's conjecture:** g-factor should be replaced by mood which, under favorable mental condition, can generate sufficient mental/neural energy

Thus, "g" of **Figure 2** is replaced by "mood" and generate a modified three stratum approach to Cattell-Horn-Carrol (CHC) theory of intelligence shown in

creative fluency and originality (i.e. novelty) than deactivating moods.

inside the brain to activate different cognitive activities.

Treating brains as neural information processors does not help understand brain function (consciousness) as a physical process because information, according to the commonly accepted definitions, is not a physical property of brains at the neural

In section 3.1, we have already discussed Spearman's g-factor.

Spearman's theory postulated a general capacity, termed g — a kind of "mental energy/neural energy" … from which all cognitive processes are derived. g-factor is a commonly accepted entity, but there is no evidence of how mental energy (neural energy) is generated. There are several pending debates on this particular issue. Setting aside the debates (section 3.1) we replace g-factor by a more intuitive term "Mood" which is also not measurable but which is more pragmatic to assume in the present context of a cognitive process. The mood is a favorable state of mind consists of the nervous system, to do something through a hierarchy of levels. The mood is placed at the top of the hierarchy and factors of varying degrees of generality further down. Thus, when a person is in a favorable state of mind to solve any problem, the person is in the right mood to solve it. That means, under a favorable state of mind (i.e. in the right mood) neural energy is charged at an absolute magnitude and initiate several levels of intelligence to solve a problem. If a person is in the off mood, then neural energy of the mind is not sufficiently charged to handle a problem.
