Outdoor Performance and Stability Assessment of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs)

*Reema Agarwal, Yogeshwari Vyas, Priyanka Chundawat, Dharmendra and Chetna Ameta*

## **Abstract**

In this era the requirement for energy is enhancing, therefore, many energy resources are developed among them the emerging third-generation dye-sensitized solar cell is one of the environment-friendly solar cell-based technology. Generally, dye-sensitized solar cells consist of a nanomaterial-based photoanode, dye molecules as an absorber, electrolyte, and counter electrode. In the case of indoor application, this solar cell works easily so this is the characteristics of a dye-sensitized solar cell. Moreover, the outdoor performance of DSSC degrades on exposure to sunlight. Exposure to sunlight increases the temperature of the internal component of DSSC and consequently degradation in device performance. Long-term stability is obtained by the choice of such material where degradation takes place slowly and plastic covers are also coated over DSSC to prevent degradation. The solar response of DSSC towards dye was also mentioned, the higher the percentage of EQE higher the efficiency of the device. In this chapter, the authors discuss the introduction of a solar cell, the working principle of DSSC, and the available research background for outdoor performance and long-term stability with a solar response of device i.e. EQE or IPCE.

**Keywords:** DSSC, Solar energy, Outdoor, Stability, IPCE

## **1. Introduction**

Climate change in the 21st century influences the water resources and food which pattern disease and impact greatly the mankind livelihood. Thus, an efficient mechanism is mandatory to control the emission of hazardous gases. The reduction in carbon emission will also help greatly for the environment, most of the nations are seriously working to mitigate this problem. The utilization of available low Carbon energy resources such as solar and wind will be a milestone to cater to the energy necessities of the globe without harming the environment. After the oil crisis in the year 1973, the alternative sources for energy harvesting are derived by many scientists and still, research is going on [1]. The rising population and higher living standards are influencing climate change significantly. Industrialization, the technologically driven changing landscape of cities have increased the energy demand hugely. The resources of energy are commercial and non-commercial where the commercial resources

mainly include fossil fuels like coal or natural gas whereas the non-commercial resources include wood and animal and agriculture wastes as well. Fossil fuel resources are non-renewable, limited in stocks, and creates pollution in the environment, as well as these, are fastly depleting. Therefore, research on the development of new energy resources is extremely needed to cater to the energy demand of the revolutionized world. Renewable energy resources are eco-friendly, abundant, and practically inexhaustible. Sun is one of the renewable resources for green and free energy which provides a tremendous amount of energy without any expenditure. The sun irradiates more energy per hour vis-à-vis the total energy consumed globally during one year. Solar energy is non-depletable, pollution-free, and available in abundance on the surface of Earth planet throughout the year. The Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) research organization made research on the current scenario of energy consumption and production and concluded that 50 percent of the world's energy would come from solar cells and wind by the end of 2050 [2]. Therefore, the use of solar energy could increase the economic growth of any country without affecting the environment.

The solar cell is a device that transforms solar or light into electrical energy, it is just a p-n junction or a diode. The Silicon-based solar cells were firstly used to convert sunlight into electricity, therefore, these solar cells are also recognized as traditional or conventional solar cells. The solar cells are classified into three generations. The first generation or crystalline Silicon solar cells are widely used as these have been shown higher power conversion efficiency (ɳ) about 26% [3, 4] and dominated the solar cell market ever since its invention, but fabrication of crystalline Silicon solar cells suffers from high module cost and a significant amount of by-products. The second generation comprises thin-film-based solar cells which reduced materials consumption and consequently cost of the device. This generation includes amorphous silicon solar cells, cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin-film solar cells, and copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS) thin-film solar cells [5–7]. The materials to the second generation solar cells are rare elements (e.g. Tellurium) and hazardous (e.g. Cadmium). Due to the high cost of first-generation solar cells, and toxicity, and limited availability of materials for second-generation solar cells, a new generation of solar cells emerges as third generation [8]. The third-generation solar cells comprise a variety of new materials besides the evergreen and champion Silicon which include nanomaterials and Silicon wires. The third-generation solar cells are designed to trim down the cost and are based on the simple, cheap, and easy fabrication process. This generation includes dye-sensitized, polymer, quantum dot, perovskite solar cells. Given costeffectiveness, efficiency, and easy fabrication process, the dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC) could be one of the best promising alternatives to the Silicon solar cells [9].

The configuration of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) comprises a glass substrate (conductive substrate), nanostructure semiconductor (photo-anode), sensitizer (dye), electrolyte, and catalyst counter electrode [10]. Nowadays, the DSSC devices are developed to have such a photo-anode that could efficiently harvest the energy, increase the dye pickup, light scattering ability, reduce recombination reaction and improve charge transferability [11]. The prototype DSSC was reported by Michael Gratzel in 1991. The DSSCs are one of the most efficient photo-to-electron conversion devices under indoor and low-level outdoor lighting for integrating green buildings. For a DSSC device, the highest achieved efficiency is 14.30% (practically) to the date where the Co (II/III) based electrolyte was used with the co-sensitization of organic dyes [12]. The theoretically predicted maximum efficiency for DSSC is 32% which is estimated and limited by the Shockley-Queisser limit based upon the principle of detailed balance [13]. In the architecture of dye-sensitized solar cells, usually, TiO2 (titanium dioxide) is preferred because of its photoactive, low cost, and abundant availability [14]. The most used dye for DSSC is N719 (Cis-Di-(thiocyanato) bis (2,2′-bipyridyl)-4,4′-dicarboxylate)

#### *Outdoor Performance and Stability Assessment of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98621*

ruthenium (II)) owing to its good light absorber and charge transfer properties vis-à-vis to any other dyes [15]. A volatile electrolyte such as iodide/triiodide is commonly used which has a highly corrosive nature and good reaction with Platinum (Pt) based counter electrode [16, 17]. The photo-anode of DSSC is usually coated employing chemical route-based techniques like doctor blade and spin coating followed by high-temperature heat treatment [18–20].

DSSC can be useful for portable electronic devices, iPods, and solar lamps that work on the outdoor light source. The outdoor performance of the DSSC device was observed by many scientists in terms of the commercialization of DSSC. But the main factor that affects solar efficiency is a temperature that decreases the longterm stability of the device. To increases the stability of DSSC it was covered by plastic but appropriate results are not obtained. DSSC can easily work in a low-light condition or cloudy condition so these cells are a good option for building integrated photovoltaic cells (BIPV). However, DSSC also exhibits photoresponse/EQE concerning dye and electrolyte. Higher the EQE/IPCE means the photon absorbed by dye molecule is high therefore regeneration of electrolyte takes place and high efficiency of the respected device is observed. This chapter comprises a basic introduction to solar cells viz. principle of solar cells, and description of dye-sensitized solar cells as well the outdoor performance and stability along with photoresponse external quantum efficiency of the solar cell (EQE).

A solar cell directly converts solar energy into electrical energy by a physical process termed as "photovoltaic effect". The conversion of energy occurs without any intermediate process in certain semiconductor materials. In the photovoltaic effect, a semiconducting material generates charge carriers (electrons in conduction band and corresponding holes in valence band) when it is exposed by light where the light or solar energy and optical energy band gap of the exposed material are the important parameters. In the photoelectric effect, charge carriers are electrons while in the photovoltaic effect, charge carriers are both the electrons and holes. The photovoltaic effect was firstly discovered in 1839 by French Physicist Edmond Becquerel. During experimentation with wet cells, Becquerel noted that the voltage of the cell increased when its silver plates were exposed to the sunlight [21]. The solar cells are composed of different types of semiconductors where p-type and n-type layers are joined together to form a p-n junction (**Figure 1**). The junction between two types of semiconductors promotes an electrical field which is formed in the region of the junction as electrons move towards the positive p-side and holes towards the negative n-side. This generated field causes negatively charged carriers to move in one direction and positively charged carriers in opposite direction. On connecting it with the load, an electric current is produced in the circuit.

The sunlight is composed of photons which are the smallest energy bundles of electromagnetic radiation or energy. These photons can be absorbed by the absorber layer of the photovoltaic cell if the photons have energy (hυ) equal or greater than Eg and less than 2 Eg where Eg is the band gap of the layer concerned. When the light of a suitable wavelength is incident on these cells, energy from the photon is transferred to an atom of the semiconducting material in the p-n junction. Specifically, energy is transferred to the electrons in the material. This causes the electrons to jump to a higher energy level which is known as the conduction band. This leaves behind a "hole" in the valance band from which an electron is jumped up. This movement of the electron as a result of added energy creates two charge carriers viz. electrons in the conduction band and holes in the valence band. The asymmetric junction of different natures of semiconducting materials in the solar cell leads to the separation of these charge carriers (electron and holes) and establishes the built-in potential which impels these charge carriers towards the respective electrodes to contribute to electric current in the circuit.

**Figure 1.** *A systematic presentation of the photovoltaic effect [22].*

## **2. Dye-sensitized solar cells**

As stated in the introduction part that the energy demand has increased the depletion of fossil fuels, therefore, the development of new skills which are based on renewable energy resources are spurred by world-leading scientists so that the upcoming new generation does not face any crisis related to the energy. Photovoltaic technology is eco-friendly and attractive among all renewable energy technologies. It directly converts sunlight into electrical energy, thus, it is broadly used for harvesting solar energy. The conventional Silicon-based solar cells are quite restricted because of their high cost, hence inexpensive, environmentally friendly, and simple fabrication process-based solar cells such as dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are used [23]. The dye-sensitized solar cells are comprised of a semiconducting material photo-anode, a counter electrode, an electrolyte, and a sensitizer (dye). DSSC can work in dark and cloudy conditions so it is an excellent candidate for indoor applications. O'Regan and Gratzel developed the first dye-sensitized solar in 1991 by colloidal nanoparticles of TiO2 thin films which had an efficiency of 7.1%. The main aim of the present chapter is to introduce DSSC therefore, it is discussed in detail.

#### **2.1 Device structure and working principle of dye-sensitized solar cell**

A typical dye-sensitized solar cell is assembled in a sandwich-type structure. Generally, transparent conductive glass is used as a substrate for the deposition of nanocrystalline thin films of metal oxide. The metal oxide films are sensitized by absorbing dye molecules where dye is covalently attached to the surface of the photo-anode for generating the photoelectrons. An organic electrolyte solution that contains redox couple is used for collecting electrons at the surface of the counter electrode and regenerating dye molecules. A catalyst deposited on a conductive substrate is used as a counter electrode for the development of dye-sensitized solar cells [24]. The schematic representation of the device structure to a typical DSSC is shown in **Figure 2**.

*Outdoor Performance and Stability Assessment of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98621*

*Schematic device structure of a typical dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC).*

The absorption of irradiance and charge separation is quite different in the dye-sensitized solar cell as compared to the classical p-n junction solar cell [25]. An electron transfer process of sandwich-type dye-sensitized solar cells is systematically represented in **Figure 3**. The whole working process of the dye-sensitized solar cell is explained in three steps (1) Photo-excitation, (2) Transportation, and (3) Regeneration.

When the sunlight falls on a dye-sensitized solar cell device, then the present dye molecules on the surface of the TiO2 layer (behaves like electron transport layer) absorb the incident photons and consequently excite the electrons. The excited electrons of dye which present above the conduction band of TiO2 are immediately injected into the conduction band of TiO2 and dye molecules get oxidized. At this stage, an electrochemical potential difference is generated between semiconductor oxide and electrolyte, and the electron density of TiO2 also is increased due to charge carrier transfer from dye molecules to metal oxide.

Now, these electrons transfer from metal oxide to counter electrode through the external load where these electrons further transfer to the electrolyte. Herein, reduction of the electrolyte takes place by converting tri-iodide (I3 − ) into iodide (I− ). Regeneration of dye molecules is occurred by receiving electrons from iodide and simultaneous oxidation of iodide to tri-iodide happens. Regeneration of I− is taken place by counter electrode so the whole cycle is regenerated. The flow of electrons through the external circuit generates electrical energy [27–29].

The chemical reactions that took place in the mechanism are given as below [30–33]:

#### *2.1.1 The chemical reaction of dye-sensitized solar cell*

$$\text{Dye} + \text{hv} \rightarrow \text{Dye} \ast \text{(Photoexiction)} \tag{1}$$

$$\text{Dye} \ast \text{TiO}\_z \to \text{Dye}^\* + \text{e}\_{\text{CB}}^- \text{(TiO}\_z) \text{(Electron injection)} \tag{2}$$

$$\text{2Dye}^\* + \text{3I}^- \rightarrow \text{2Dye} + \text{I}\_\text{,}^- \left(\text{Dye regeneration}\right) \tag{3}$$

$$\text{I}\_{\text{g}}^{-} + 2\text{e}^{-}\_{\text{catalyst}} \rightarrow 3\text{I}^{-} \left( \text{Electrolyte regeneration} \right) \tag{4}$$

$$\text{Dye}^\* + \text{e}\_{\text{CB}}^- \left( \text{TiO}\_z \right) \rightarrow \text{Dye} + \text{TiO}\_z \left( \text{Recombination} \right) \tag{5}$$

$$\mathrm{H}\_{\mathrm{g}}^{-} + 2\mathrm{e}^{-}\_{\mathrm{CB}} \left( \mathrm{TiO}\_{\mathrm{z}} \right) \rightarrow \mathrm{3I}^{-} + \mathrm{TiO}\_{\mathrm{z}} \left( \mathrm{Back\ reaction} \right) \tag{6}$$

$$\text{Dye\*} \to \text{Dye} \tag{7}$$

#### **2.2 Components of dye-sensitized solar cell**

a.**Substrate:** Generally, a transparent conductive glass substrate is used for the fabrication of thin-film layers which could be employed as transparent conducting oxide substrates to develop a device. The transparent conducting oxide can be either Fluorine doped Tin oxide (FTO) or Indium doped Tin oxide (ITO) [34]. FTO substrate is usually applied for DSSC owing to good conduction property, stability, durability, and low toxicity. Besides the conductive

glass substrates, the plastic materials, metal sheets, Ti foils are also useful substrates for DSSCs and according to the device, architecture may be designed.


in dye, it is classified into three main categories viz. metal complex, metal-free organic complex, and natural sensitizer [63]. Ruthenium-based sensitizers are remarkable for achieving higher efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells [64, 65].

## **3. Outdoor performance and stability of dye-sensitized solar cell**

In outdoor conditions the main factor that affects efficiency is temperature. In this section different solar radiation illumination was discussed. The stability of dye-sensitized solar cell is mainly influenced by electrolyte, liquid electrolyte exhibit higher efficiency but the volatile nature of liquid electrolyte degrades solar cell and therefore stability of the cell reduces.

Yuan et al. [66] tested outdoor application of DSSC for Building Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) application where a time duration of four years was taken into consideration. Here dye Z991 and Z907 were used for cell fabrication where the first one harnesses 15% more electricity over the later one for two years. Given the stability of the device, the efficiency of dye Z991 based solar cell decreases to 17% for the initial two years thereafter efficiency remains stable for the remaining two years. Moreover, the Z907 based DSSC device is out of the use or degrade after four years in outdoor application. The stability of Z991 over Z907 is due to the presence of thiophene moieties in Z991 i.e. responsible for better energy harvesting and thermal stability. When the solar irradiance increase there is no linearly incremented in electricity generation for irradiance of lower than 20 Wh.

Kato et al. [67] synthesized dye-sensitized solar cells with N719 dye, TiO2, and carbon counter electrode and tested durability test in the outdoor working condition for a time duration of 2.5 years. The DSSC modules were developed monolithically series interconnected on the TCO substrate and covered by a waterproof cover. Before the exposure to sunlight, the device reveals 0.32 and 0.71 suns from the current–voltage curve and power-voltage curve. During the stability test voltage was approximately kept around 1.6 V. The solar parameters such as JSC fall for 5 months thereafter it remains constant for left years and efficiency decreases/degrades subsequently decrement in VOC and FF. Additionally, EIS reveals exposure of cell in outdoor increases the Nernst impedance of triiodide and Raman spectra also reveals increment in luminescent ingredients of electrolyte, therefore, VOC and FF decreases in outdoor condition. Berginc et al. [68] outdoor exposed ionic liquid-based dye-sensitized solar cell for 7 months in solar radiation of 906kWh/m2 . In the summers maximum VOC is obtained in the early morning and on an autumn day when days are shorter and temperature is lower that time JSC of cell increases. Park et al. [69] observed the change in film thickness effects J-V curve (**Figure 4**) of TiO2 based solar cell under 1 sunlight intensity. On increasing the thickness, the JSC of the cell increases from 6.6 to 10.7 mA/cm2 i.e. about 62% whereas the fall down in VOC is 759 to 727 mV due to increases in surface area that accounts for more dye molecule absorbing.

Asghar et al. [70] developed dye-sensitized solar cell and tested in outdoor condition as well comparison with silicon cell was carried out. Here the lower irradiance and higher temperature are suitable for DSSC, at these parameter DSSC harvest more energy instead of silicon solar cell. The efficiency of DSSC decreases as time duration increases. Moreover, the device that was fabricated by employing MPN as an electrolyte degrades fast whereas ionic liquid-based devices are more stable and constant efficiency was observed for two months then degradation initiates. The thermal influence of dye-sensitized solar cells was studied by Matsui et al. [71] where the current collecting study was done. When the temperature was maintained at around 85° C leakage of ionic liquid does not occur but the long-term stability of the device is strongly affected by moisture. Therefore double-sealed

*Outdoor Performance and Stability Assessment of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98621*

**Figure 4.**

*The effect of film thickness on the J-V curve of DSSC. Reprinted with permission from ref. [69] copyright (2000) American Chemical Society.*

**Figure 5.**

*The J-V curve for DSSC with the different counter electrodes. Reprinted with permission from ref. [73] copyright (2012) John Wiley and Sons.*

package for the device was invented and a test on substrate size of 50 mm × 50 mm was used where 85° C temperature was maintained for 1000 hours and stability was observed. Bella et al. [72] designed fluoropolymer and rare elements-free light shifting coating systems for dye-sensitized solar cell devices. The introduction of fluorescent species in DSSC downshifts UV photons into visible light that significantly improves PV efficiency by 60%. The improvement in efficiency is

accountable for improvement in photon flux i.e. caused by the introduction of luminescent agent that results from nanometric light shifting in organic dyes. Now the outdoor long-term stability was measured for 3 months where the introduction of a light shifting agent preserves the power conversion efficiency of the solar cell.

Freitag et al. [74] demonstrated dye-sensitized solar cells with dye D35 and XY1 were copper-based redox electrolyte is used. At the AM of 1.5 G, the observed PCE is 11.3% and under 1000 lux indoor condition it achieves 28.9%. The obtained results point out DSSC are suitable for ambient light condition. Mehmood et al. [75] constructed DSSC with an organic photosensitizer. The PCE of the cell was 2.58% at 25°C in air mass of 1.5 G and illumination of 100 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> . The increment in temperature falls down the efficiency of this solar cell it is stable up to 35°C. Wu et al. [73] demonstrated dye-sensitized solar cells with an area of 100 cm2 and lightweight based on Ti substrates. Here PEDOT counter electrode is used which is having good transparency and electrocatalytic activity. The J-V curve (**Figure 5**) reveals the current density (ISC) of PEDOT-Pt/Ti is higher. The photoconversion efficiency was achieved about 6.69% and in an outdoor condition of solar radiation of 55 mW cm−2 0.368 W power output was observed.

## **4. Spectral response/external quantum efficiency (EQE) response/ incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE)**

Generally, dye-sensitized solar cell photoresponse for a given incident wavelength of light and the result is depicted in form of varying wavelength and percentage of IPCE. When the current is generated through the response of photon that time characteristics peak appears at a particular wavelength. It is the ratio of generated electrons to the incident photons. Moreover, IPCE depends upon the yield of electron transfer and light-harvesting efficiency that causes quantum charge injection and electron quantum efficiency in the present external circuit of the device. In the case of DSSC, the measurement of IPCE clears that dye is well linked to photoanode and electrolyte. When incident photons are exposed on DSSC that time dye uptake electrons from photoanode and create electron–hole pair and holes are transmitted to the electrolyte.

The generation of photocurrent i.e. dependent on wavelength is known as external quantum efficiency (EQE) where AC and DC mode is used for the generation of the beam. In the case of DC mode irradiation of monochromatic beam on a sample is continuously carried out for 3 sec so electrons reach to steady-state. In AC mode monochromatic light is chopped by shutter and illumination of bias light on a sample is carried out. Jeong et al. [76] measured EQE of DSSC and tandem cell (DSSC/CIGS) in DC mode. The EQE spectra reveal in the wavelength range of 300–800 nm EQE of DSSC was observed and for tandem cells, EQE spectra are almost similar to DSSC. When Berginc et al. [68] DSSC was exposed to outdoor conditions for seven months, the EQE of the solar cell was measured. The peak at 360 nm is accountable for absorption in the TiO2 layer, 380 nm for change in I3- and at 450 nm for dye molecules degradation.

Kubo et al. [77] developed a tandem structure-based solar cell that improves the photocurrent of dye-sensitized solar cells. The IPCE of tandem solar cells is relatively outstanding to single cells. Tandem solar cell has elevated solar response (good external quantum efficiency), photocurrent and conversion efficiency from single-cell as well lower VOC and higher FF was also observed. Park et al. [69] prepared homogeneous, crack-free, and rod-shaped rutile TiO2 thin films with having a thickness of 12 μm. The measurement of IPCE (incident photon-to-current *Outdoor Performance and Stability Assessment of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98621*

efficiency) till 600 nm wavelength indicated that a significant amount of light was absorbed very fast in few microns but at higher wavelength, the increment in IPCE was directly proportional to the film thickness see **Figure 6**. Rutile and anatase films were compared having similar thickness where photocurrent of rutile based solar cell was 30% lower vis-a-vis to the anatase phase owing to the less amount of absorbed dye, small surface area, and transportation of electrons was also slow for rutile thin film-based solar cells. Lepikko et al. [78] tested outdoor performance of DSSC for 1000 h in 1 sun. The efficiency and fill factor of cell rise in outdoor condition i.e. just double of indoor condition well-remaining of solar irradiance. The IPCE decreases about 30% during testing of the cell this is due to photodegradation of electrolyte see **Figure 7**.

#### **Figure 6.**

*The effect of a film thickness of TiO2 on IPCE value of a solar cell. Reprinted with permission from ref. [69] copyright (2000) American Chemical Society.*

#### **Figure 7.**

*The IPCE curve of DSSC in harsh northern outdoor conditions. Reprinted with permission from ref. [78] copyright (2018) John Wiley and Sons.*

Roy et al. [79] studied the annealing of TiO2 nanotubes at 450°C for 30 minutes where the amorphous phase was converted into anatase. Post annealing and the TiCl4 treatments were carried in a closed vessel at 70°C for 30 min. SEM image of TiO2 nanotubes treated with TiCl4 confirmed uniform decoration with TiO2 nanoparticles and IPCE of the decorated samples was found 66% with a conversion efficiency of 3.8%. The ultrathin nanosheets of SnO2 were introduced as photoanode in dye-sensitized solar cells for improvement in photoconversion efficiency by Xing et al. [80]. The nanosheets were developed by hydrothermal method and screen printed over FTO substrates, then a coating of TiO2 on SnO2 was performed to solve the problem of lower open-circuit voltage. The diffraction peak in XRD patterns revealed to the tetragonal rutile like SnO2 and FESEM images displayed a 3D flowerlike structure. HRTEM images of nanosheets showed lattice fringes over the entire surface. The efficiency of the devices using SnO2 NSs-TiO2 was 1.79% and IPCE was 35% which was much higher vis-a-vis the devices made up of SnO2 nanoparticles i.e. revealed by **Figure 8**.

Kumara et al. [81] employed natural dyes obtained from Ixora sp. (IX) and Canarium odontophyllum (CMB) which mainly contained anthocyanin that was used to improve the performance of DSSCs. The layered co-sensitization of dyes was carried out by firstly immersing TiO2 electrode in CMB extract followed by de-adsorption and then again immersed in second sensitizer IX for adsorption. The absorption spectrum of the co-sensitized electrode was increased as compared to the individual and mixture sensitized and similar results were obtained in IPCE measurement. The photovoltaic properties of the co-sensitized electrode were obtained under irradiance of 1000 W/m2 with a short circuit current density of 9.80 mA/cm2, VOC of 343 mV, fill factor of 0.46, and photoconversion efficiency of 1.55%. Gupta et al. [82] developed Cu/S co-doped TiO2 as a photoanode for dyesensitized solar cells. Here undoped TiO2 exhibits about 70.02% of IPCE whereas it increases further on codoping with Cu/S. 0.1% Cu/S exhibits 73.65% of IPCE and on increment, the 0.3% Cu/S exhibits 82.98% of IPCE at a wavelength of 530 nm.

#### **Figure 8.**

*IPCE curve of DSSC with different photoelectrode. Reprinted with permission from ref. [80] copyright (2012) American Chemical Society.*

*Outdoor Performance and Stability Assessment of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98621*

The improvement in IPCE is accountable due to the small size of particles and enhancement in short circuit current density (JSC).

Patni et al. [83] fabricated dye-sensitized solar cells with natural dyes. The natural dyes were used are anthocyanin, betalain, and chlorophyll obtained from the extracts of Roselle spinach beetroot respectively. At the wavelength of 430 nm 6.21% IPCE was observed for anthocyanin dye and at 530 nm 9.9% of IPCE was measured for betalain and 6.1% IPCE was observed for chlorophyll-based dye at a wavelength of 660 nm. The blending or mixing of dye improves the IPCE. Wood et al. [84] reported the IPCE for different dye i.e. The cationic 1-hexyl-2,3,3-3H indolium acceptor dye (CAD3) dye exhibit IPCE of 50% and bodipy dye, it is 53% and for P1 54% was observed where the p-type dye-sensitized solar cell was fabricated. This chapter comprised literature on the solar response of DSSC on exposure of induced photons. Different dyes exhibit a variation in photon-to-current conversion efficiency. The higher the IPCE means the efficiency of the cell is a good and better amount of energy can be harvested by solar cell.

## **5. Conclusion**

The dye-sensitized solar cell technology has an impact on the PV market owing to easy fabrication, cost, chemical stability, availability of chemicals, and good power conversion efficiency. In this chapter, we discussed the introduction of solar cells with working principles, complete elaboration of dye-sensitized solar cells, and outdoor performance and stability in different solar irradiations. Outdoor performance is affected by the temperature because on exposure to sunlight the temperature raise degrades the electrolyte and therefore stability and performance of the device decreases. Moreover, on rainy days the chances of degradation are increasing due to water or moisture, therefore, coating/layer of a suitable material is carried out over the solar cell this also increases the long-term stability of the device. The IPCE of solar cells initially is higher but with time duration it falls due to cell degradation or leaking and for a long time it stabilizes without so many changes. This chapter emphasizes the efficiency of DSSC when it exposes the outdoor and solar response of DSSC.

## **Acknowledgements**

The authors thank Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur. Reema Agarwal greatly acknowledges CSIR, New Delhi for financial support through Senior Research Fellowship (File No.: 09/172(0090)/2019-EMR-I).

## **Conflict of interest**

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

*Solar Radiation - Measurement, Modeling and Forecasting Techniques for Photovoltaic…*

## **Author details**

Reema Agarwal, Yogeshwari Vyas, Priyanka Chundawat, Dharmendra and Chetna Ameta\* Department of Chemistry, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, India

\*Address all correspondence to: chetna.ameta@yahoo.com

© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

*Outdoor Performance and Stability Assessment of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98621*

## **References**

[1] Painter DS. Oil and geopolitics: The oil crises of the 1970s and the cold war. Historical Social Research. 2014;39:186- 208. DOI: 10.12759/hsr.39.2014.4. 186-208.

[2] https://www.popularmechanics.com/ science/energy/a21756137/renewables-50-percent-energy-2050/ [Internet].

[3] Green MA, Dunlop ED, Dean HL, Jochen HE, Masahiro Y, Anita WYH. Mint: Solar cell efficiency tables (version 54). Progress in Photovoltaics. 2019;27:565-575. DOI:10.1002/pip.3171

[4] Dréon J, Jeangros Q , Cattin J, Haschke J, Antognini L, Ballif C, Boccard M. Mint: 23.5%-efficient silicon heterojunction silicon solar cell using molybdenum oxide as hole-selective contact. Nano Energy. 2020;70:104495. DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104495

[5] Carlson DE, Wronski CR. Mint: Amorphous silicon solar cell. Applied Physics Letters. 1976;28:671-673. DOI: 10.1063/1.88617

[6] Chu TL, Chu SS. Mint: Recent progress in thin-film cadmium telluride solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics. 1993;1:31-42. DOI: 10.1002/pip.4670010105

[7] Kazmerski LL, White FR, Morgan GK. Mint: Thin-film CuInSe2/ CdS heterojunction solar cells. Applied Physics Letters. 1976;29:268-269. DOI: 10.1063/1.89041

[8] Ranabhat K, Patrikeev L, Revina AA, Andrianov K, Lapshinsky V, Sofronova E. Mint: An introduction to solar cell technology. Journal of Applied Engineering Science. 2016;14:481-491. DOI 10.5937/jaes14-10879

[9] Halme J. Dye-sensitized nanostructured and organic photovoltaic cells: technical review and preliminary tests [thesis]. Finland: Helsinki University of Technology; 2002.

[10] Tang YB, Lee CS, Xu J, Liu ZT, Chen ZH, He Z, Cao YL, Yuan G, Song H, Chen L, Luo L, Cheng HM, Zhang WJ, Bello I, Lee ST. Mint: Incorporation of graphenes in nanostructured TiO2 films via molecular grafting for dye-sensitized solar cell application. ACS Nano. 2010;4:3482- 3488. DOI: 10.1021/nn100449w

[11] Gratzel M. Mint: Dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. 2003;4:145-153. DOI: 10.1016/ S1389-5567(03)00026-1

[12] Kakiage K, Aoyama Y, Yano T, Oya K, Fujisawa J-I, Hanaya M. Mint: Highlyefficient dye-sensitized solar cells with collaborative sensitization by silyl-anchor and carboxy anchor dyes. Chemical Communications. 2015;51:15894-15897. DOI: 10.1039/C5CC06759F

[13] Graetzel M, Janssen RAJ, Mitzi DB, Sargent EH. Mint: Materials interface engineering for solution-processed photovoltaics. Nature. 2012;488: 304-312. DOI: 10.1038/nature11476

[14] Li T-Y, Su C, Akula SB, Sun W-G, Chien H-M, Li W-R. Mint: New pyridinium ylide dyes for dye sensitized solar cell applications. Organic Letters. 2016;18:3386-3389. DOI: 10.1021/acs. orglett.6b01539

[15] Wei L, Chen S, Yang Y, Dong Y, Song W, Fan R. Mint: Reduced graphene oxide modified TiO2 semiconductor materials for dye-sensitized solar cells. RSC Advances. 2016;6:100866-100875. DOI: 10.1039/C6RA22112B

[16] Liu Y, Yun S, Zhou X, Hou Y, Zhang T, Li J, Hagfeldt A. Mint: Intrinsic origin of superior catalytic properties of tungsten-based catalysts in dyesensitized solar cells. Electrochimica Acta. 2017;242:390-399. DOI: 10.1016/j. electacta.2017.04.176

[17] Hashmi SG, Özkan M, Halme J, Zakeeruddin SM, Paltakari J, Grätzel M, Lund PD. Mint: Dye-sensitized solar cells with inkjet-printed dyes. Energy & Environmental Science. 2016;9:2453- 2462. DOI: 10.1039/C6EE00826G

[18] Bhand S, Chadar D, Pawar K, Naushad M, Pathan H, Salunke-Gawali S. Mint: Benzo [α] phenothiazine sensitized ZrO2 based dye sensitized solar cell. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics. 2018;29:1034-1041. DOI: 10.1007/s10854-017-8003-2

[19] Ünlü B, Çakar S, Özacar M. Mint: The effects of metal doped TiO2 and dithizone-metal complexes on DSSCs performance. Solar Energy. 2018;166:441- 449. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.03.064

[20] Ruhane TA, Islama MT, Rahaman MS, Bhuiyan MMH, Islam JMM, Bhuiyan TI, Khan KA, Khan MA. Mint: Impact of photo electrode thickness and annealing temperature on natural dye sensitized solar cell. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2017;20:72-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2017.01.012

[21] Boyle G. Renewable Energy: Power for a Sustainable Future. UK:Oxford University Press;1996. 479 p. DOI:

[22] https://energyeducation.ca/wiki/ images/1/11/Photovoltaiceffect.png [Internet].

[23] Gong J, Sumathy K, Qiao Q, Zhou Z. Mint: Review on dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs): Advanced techniques and research trends. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;68: 234-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.097

[24] Lee C-P, Ho K-C. Mint: Poly (ionic liquid)s for dye-sensitized solar cells: A mini-review. European Polymer Journal. 2018;108:420-428. DOI: 10.1016/ j.eurpolymj.2018.09.022

[25] Sengupta D, Das P, Mondal B, Mukherjee K. Mint: Effects of doping, morphology and film-thickness of photo-anode materials for dye sensitized solar cell application – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016;60:356-376. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.104

[26] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Dye-sensitized\_solar\_cell [Internet].

[27] Calogero G, Bartolotta A, Marco GD, Carlo AD, Bonaccorso F. Mint: Vegetablebased dye-sensitized solar cells. Chemical Society Reviews. 2015;44:3244-3294. DOI: 10.1039/C4CS00309H

[28] Roslan N, Ya'acob ME, Radzi MAM, Hashimoto Y, Jamaludin D, Chen G. Mint: Dye sensitized solar cell (DSSC) greenhouse shading: New insights for solar radiation manipulation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018; 92:171-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018. 04.095

[29] Richhariya G, Kumar A, Tekasakul P, Gupta B. Mint: Natural dyes for dye sensitized solar cell: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;69:705-718. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.198

[30] Deb Nath NC, Lee J-J. Mint: Binary redox electrolytes used in dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2019;78:53-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.05.018

[31] Kumara NTRN, Limb A, Lim CM, Petra MI, Ekanayake P. Mint: Recent progress and utilization of natural pigments in dye sensitized solar cells: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;78:301-317. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.075

[32] Mehmood U, Al-Ahmed A, Al-Sulaiman FA, Malik MI, Shehzad F, Khan AUH. Mint: Effect of temperature on the photovoltaic performance and stability of solid-state dye-sensitized solar *Outdoor Performance and Stability Assessment of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98621*

cells: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;79: 946-959. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.114

[33] Iqbal MZ, Khan S. Mint: Progress in the performance of dye sensitized solar cells by incorporating cost effective counter electrodes. Solar Energy. 2018;160:130-152. DOI: 10.1016/j. solener.2017.11.060

[34] Sima S, Grigoriu C, Antohe S. Mint: Comparison of the dye-sensitized solar cells performances based on transparent conductive ITO and FTO. Thin Solid Films. 2010;519:595-597. DOI: 10.1016/j. tsf.2010.07.002

[35] Peng T, Xu J, Chen R. Mint: A novel multilayer brookite TiO2 electrode for improved performance of pure brookitebased dye sensitized solar cells. Chemical Physics Letters. 2020;738:136902. DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2019.136902

[36] Siwatch S, Kundu V, Kumar A, Kumar S. Mint: Role of surfactant in optimization of 3D ZnO floret as photo-anode for dye sensitized solar cell. Applied Nanoscience. 2020;10:1035- 1044. DOI: 10.1007/s13204-019-01216-w

[37] Kavan L, Zivcova ZV, Zlamalova M, Zakeeruddin SM, Grätzel M. Mint: Electron-selective layers for dyesensitized solar cells based on TiO2 and SnO2. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2020;124:6512-6521. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11883

[38] Bhalekar VP, Baviskar PK, Prasad B, Beedri NI, Kadam VS, Pathan HM. Mint: Lead sulphide sensitized ZrO2 photoanode for solar cell application with MoO3 as a counter electrode. Chemical Physics Letters. 2017;689:15-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2017.10.001

[39] Ghosh R, Brennaman MK, Uher T, Ok M-R, Samulski ET, McNeil LE, Meyer TJ, Lopez R. Mint: Nanoforest Nb2O5 photo-anodes for dye-sensitized solar cells by pulsed laser deposition.

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2011;3:3929-3935. DOI: 10.1021/ am200805x

[40] Liu M, Yang J, Feng S, Zhu H, Zhang J, Li G, Peng J. Mint: Composite photo-anodes of Zn2SnO4 nanoparticles modified SnO2 hierarchical microspheres for dye-sensitized solar cells. Materials Letters. 2012;76:215-218. DOI: 10.1016/j. matlet.2012.02.110

[41] Prasittichai C, Hupp JT. Mint: Surface modification of SnO2 photoelectrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells: Significant improvements in photovoltage via Al2O3 atomic layer deposition. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2010;1:1611-1615. DOI: 10.1021/jz100361f

[42] Okuya M, Nakade K, Kaneko S. Mint: Porous TiO2 thin films synthesized by a spray pyrolysis deposition (SPD) technique and their application to dye-sensitized solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2002;70: 425-435. DOI: 10.1016/S0927-0248(01) 00033-2

[43] Kim GS, Seo H-K, Godble VP, Kim YS, Yang OB, Shin HS. Mint: Electrophoretic deposition of titanate nanotubes from commercial titania nanoparticles: Application to dyesensitized solar cells. Electrochemistry Communications. 2006;8:961-966. DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.03.037

[44] Li Y, Ma L, Yoo Y, Wang G, Zhang X, Ko MJ. Mint: Atomic layer deposition: A versatile method to enhance TiO2 nanoparticles interconnection of dye-sensitized solar cell at low temperature. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2019;73:351-356. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.02.006

[45] Merazga A, Al-Subai F, Albaradi AM, Badawi A, Jaber AY, Alghamdic AAB. Mint: Effect of sol–gel MgO spin-coating on the performance of TiO2-based dye-sensitized solar cells. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing. 2016;41:114-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2015.08.026

[46] Li K, Wang Y, Sun Y, Yuan C. Mint: Preparation of nanocrystalline TiO2 electrode by layer-by-layer screen printing and its application in dyesensitized solar cell. Materials Science and Engineering: B. 2010;175:44-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2010.06.019

[47] Chatterjee S, Webre WA, Patra S, Rout B, Glass GA, D'Souza F, Chatterjee S. Mint: Achievement of superior efficiency of TiO2 nanorodnanoparticle composite photo-anode in dye sensitized solar cell. Journal of Alloys and Compdounds. 2020;826:154188. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154188

[48] Pandey P, Parra MR, Haque FZ, Kurchania R. Mint: Effects of annealing temperature optimization on the efficiency of ZnO nanoparticles photoanode based dye sensitized solar cells. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics. 2017;28:1537-1545. DOI: 10.1007/s10854-016-5693-9

[49] Sadikin SN, Rahman MYA, Umar AA. Mint: Influence of annealing temperature of ZnS-coated TiO2 films on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Optik. 2020;211:16464. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164644

[50] Bao Z, Xie H, Rao j, Chen L, Wei Y, Li H, Zhou X. Mint: High performance of Pt/TiO2-nanotubes/Ti mesh electrode and its application in flexible dye-sensitized solar cell. Materials Letters. 2014;124:158-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.03.041

[51] Wang W, Liu Y, Zhong YJ, Wang L, Zhou W, Wang S, Tadé MO, Shao Z. Mint: Rational design of LaNiO3/Carbon composites as outstanding platinumfree photocathodes in dye-sensitized solar cells with enhanced catalysis for the triiodide reduction reaction.

Solar RRL. 2017;1:1700074. DOI: 10.1002/solr.201700074

[52] Sudhagar P, Nagarajan S, Lee Y-G, Song D, Son T, Cho W, Heo M, Lee K, Won J, Kang YS. Mint: Synergistic catalytic effect of a composite (CoS/ PEDOT:PSS) counter electrode on triiodide reduction in dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2011;3:1838-1843. DOI: 10.1021/am2003735

[53] Sarkar A, Chakraborty AK, Bera S. Mint: NiS/rGO nanohybrid: An excellent counter electrode for dye sensitized solar cell. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2018;182:314- 320. DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.03.026

[54] Bu C, Tai Q, Liu Y, Guo S, Zhao X. Mint: A transparent and stable polypyrrole counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cell. Journal of Power Sources. 2013;221:78-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.117

[55] Murugadoss V, Panneerselvam P, Yan C, Guo Z, Angaiah S. Mint: A simple one-step hydrothermal synthesis of cobalt-nickel selenide/graphene nanohybrid as an advanced platinum free counter electrode for dye sensitized solar cell. Electrochimica Acta. 2019; 312:157-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta. 2019.04.142

[56] Wu M, Lin X, Hagfeldt A Ma T. Mint: A novel catalyst of WO2 nanorod for the counter electrode of dyesensitized solar cells. Chemical Communications. 2011;47:4535-4537. DOI: 10.1039/C1CC10638D

[57] Wu J, Lan Z, Lin J, Huang M, Huang Y, Fan L, Luo G. Mint: Electrolytes in dye-sensitized solar cells. Chemical Reviews. 2015;115:2136-2173. DOI: 10.1021/cr400675m

[58] Kakiage K, Tokutome T, Iwamoto S, Kyomen T Hanaya M. Mint: Fabrication of a dye-sensitized solar cell containing

*Outdoor Performance and Stability Assessment of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98621*

a Mg-doped TiO2 electrode and a Br3 − / Br<sup>−</sup> redox mediator with a high opencircuit photovoltage of 1.21 V. Chemical Communications. 2013;49:179-180. DOI: 10.1039/C2CC36873K

[59] Powar S, Daeneke T, Ma MT, Fu D, Duffy NW, Götz G, Weidelener M, Mishra A, Bäuerle P, Spiccia L, Bach U. Mint: Highly efficient p-type dyesensitized solar cells based on Tris (1,2-diaminoethane) Cobalt (II)/(III) electrolytes. Angewandte Chemie. 2012;52:602-605. DOI: 10.1002/ anie.201206219

[60] Freitag M, Giordano F, Yang W, Pazoki M, Hao Y, Zietz B, Grätzel M, Hagfeldt A, Boschloo G. Mint: Copper phenanthroline as a fast and highperformance redox mediator for dyesensitized solar cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2016;120:9595- 9603. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01658

[61] Vinoth S, Kanimozhi G, Narsimulu D, Kumar H, Srinadhu ES, Satyanarayana N. Mint: Ionic relaxation of electrospun nanocomposite polymer-blend quasisolid electrolyte for high photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2020;250:122945. DOI: 10.1016/j. matchemphys.2020.122945

[62] Hsu C-Y, Chen Y-C, Lin RY-Y, Ho K-C, Lin JT. Mint: Solid-state dyesensitized solar cells based on spirofluorene (spiro-OMeTAD) and arylamines as hole transporting materials. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2012;14:14099-14109. DOI: 10.1039/C2CP41326D

[63] Mehrabian M, Dalir S. Mint: Numerical simulation of highly efficient dye sensitized solar cell by replacing the liquid electrolyte with a semiconductor solid layer. Optik. 2018;169:214-223. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.05.059

[64] Carlo GD, Biroli AO, Tessore F, Caramori S, Pizzotti M. Mint:

β-Substituted ZnII porphyrins as dyes for DSSC: A possible approach to photovoltaic windows. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2018;358:153-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.12.012

[65] Hug H, Bader M, Mair P, Glatzel T. Mint: Biophotovoltaics: Natural pigments in dye-sensitized solar cells. Applied Energy. 2014;115:216-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.055

[66] Yuan H, Wang W, Xu D, Xu Q, Xie J, Chen X, Zhang T, Xiong C, He Y, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Shen H. Mint: Outdoor testing and ageing of dye-sensitized solar cells for building integrated photovoltaics. Solar Energy 2018; 165:233-239. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.03.017

[67] Kato N, Takeda Y, Higuchi K, Takeichi A, Sudo E, Tanaka H, Motohiroa T, Sano T, Toyoda T. Mint: Degradation analysis of dye-sensitized solar cell module after long-term stability test under outdoor working condition. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 2009;93:893-897. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.solmat.2008.10.022

[68] Berginc M, Krašovec UO, Topič M. Mint: Outdoor ageing of the dyesensitized solar cell under different operation regimes. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 2014;120:491- 499. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. solmat.2013.09.029

[69] Park N-G, Lagemaat J, Frank AJ. Mint: Comparison of dye-sensitized rutile- and anatase-based TiO2 solar cells. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2000;104:8989-8994. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1021/jp994365l

[70] Asghar A, Emziane M, Pak HK, Oh SY. Mint: Outdoor testing and degradation of dye-sensitized solar cells in Abu Dhabi. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 2014;128:335-342. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2014. 05.048

[71] Matsui H, Okada K, Kitamura T, Tanabe N. Mint: Thermal stability of dye-sensitized solar cells with current collecting grid. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 2009;93:1110-1115. DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.01.008

[72] Bella F, Griffini G, Gerosa M, Turri S, Bongiovanni R. Mint: Performance and stability improvements for dye-sensitized solar cells in the presence of luminescent coatings. Journal of Power Sources 2015;283:195-203. DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.105

[73] Wu J, Xiao Y, Tang Q, Yue G, Lin J, Huang M, Huang Y, Fan L, Lan Z, Yin S, Sato T. Mint: A large-area light-weight dye-sensitized solar cell based on all titanium substrates with an efficiency of 6.69% outdoors. Advanced Materials 2012;24:1884-1888. DOI: 10.1002/ adma.201200003

[74] Freitag M, Teuscher J, Saygili Y, Zhang X, Giordano F, Liska P, Hua J, Zakeeruddin SM, Moser JE, Grätzel M, Hagfeldt A. Mint: Dye-sensitized solar cells for efficient power generation under ambient lighting. Nature Photonics 2017;11:372-378. DOI: 10.1038/ NPHOTON.2017.60

[75] Mehmood U, Malik MI, Khan AU, Hussein IA, Harrabi K, Al-Ahmed A. Mint: Effect of outdoor temperature on the power-conversion efficiency of newly synthesized organic photosensitizer based dye-sensitized solar cells. Materials Letters 2018;220:222-225. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.055

[76] Jeong WS, Lee JW, Jung S, Yun JH, Park NG. Mint: Evaluation of external quantum efficiency of a 12.35% tandem solar cell comprising dye-sensitized and CIGS solar cells. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 2011;95:3419-3423. DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.07.038

[77] Kubo W, Sakamoto A, Kitamura T, Wada Y, Yanagida S. Mint: Dyesensitized solar cells: improvement of spectral response by tandem structure. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 2004;164:33-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.01.024

[78] Lepikko S, Miettunen K, Poskela A, Tiihonen A, Lund PD. Mint: Testing dye-sensitized solar cells in harsh northern outdoor conditions. Energy Science and Engineering 2018;6:187- 200. DOI: 10.1002/ese3.195

[79] Roy P, Kim D, Paramasivam I, Schmuki P. Mint: Improved efficiency of TiO2 nanotubes in dye sensitized solar cells by decoration with TiO2 nanoparticles. Electrochemistry Communications 2009;11:1001-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom. 2009.02.049

[80] Xing J, Fang WQ, Li Z, Yang HG. Mint: TiO2-coated ultrathin SnO2 nanosheets used as photo-anodes for dye-sensitized solar cells with high efficiency. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2012;51:4247-4253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie2030823

[81] Kumara NTRN, Ekanayake P, Lim A, Liew LYC, Iskandar M, Ming LC, Senadeera GKR. Mint: Layered cosensitization for enhancement of conversion efficiency of natural dye sensitized solar cells. Journal of Alloys and Compound 2013;581: 186-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013. 07.039

[82] Gupta A, Sahu K, Dhonde M, Murty VVS. Mint: Novel synergistic combination of Cu/S co-doped TiO2 nanoparticles incorporated as photoanode in dye sensitized solar cell. Solar Energy 2020;203:296-303. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.04.043

[83] Patni N, Pillai SG, Sharma P. Mint: Effect of using betalain, anthocyanin and chlorophyll dyes together as a sensitizer on enhancing the efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cell. International

*Outdoor Performance and Stability Assessment of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98621*

Journal of Energy Research. 2020:1-14. DOI: 10.1002/er.5752

[84] Wood CJ, Summers GH, Gibson EA. Mint: Increased photocurrent in a tandem dye-sensitized solar cell by modifications in push–pull dye-design. Chemical Communication. 2015;51: 3915-3918. DOI: 10.1039/c4cc10230d
