**Acknowledgements**

The authors would like to thank the support given by the Project SCAPEFIRE (PCIF/MOS/0046/2017) financed by FCT (Science and Technology Foundation). This work was developed in CITAB (UID/AGR/04033/2019) and in LEAF (UID/ AGR/04129/2013), financed by the FCT through national funds. The authors also thank Jill Barbour for the text review.

**References**

247-300

[1] Attiwill P. The disturbance of forest ecosystems: The ecological basis for conservative management. Forest Ecology and Management. 1994;**63**:

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91701*

*Spatial and Temporal Variability Regarding Forest: From Tree to the Landscape*

Species diversity, functional diversity and ecosystem functioning. In: Loreau M et al., editors. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning - Synth. Perspect. Oxford Uni. Press; 2002.

[12] Jax K. Ecosystem Functioning. Cambridge Univ Press; 2010. p. 272

[13] Bouget C, Larrieu L, Nusillard B, Parmain G. In search of the best local habitat drivers for saproxylic beetle diversity in temperate deciduous forests. Biodiversity and Conservation.

[14] White P. Pattern, process and natural disturbance in vegetation. The Botanical Review. 1979;**45**:229-299

[15] White P, Pickett S. Natural disturbance and patch dynamics. In: Pickett S, White P, editors. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. NY: Academic Inc.; 1985.

[16] Bazzaz F. Characteristics of

Verlag; 1983. pp. 259-275

[19] Crooks KR, Sanjayan M.

1989;**4**:241-245

695-697

population in relation to disturbance in natural and man-modified ecosystems. In: Money H, Godron M, editors. Disturbance and Ecosystems:

Components of Response. NY: Springer-

[17] Pickett S, McDonnell M. Changing perspectives in community dynamics: A theory of successional forces. Trees.

[18] Hunter J. Benchmarks for managing ecosystems: Are human activities natural? Conservation Biology. 1996;**10**:

Connectivity conservation: Maintaining connections for nature. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan M, editors. Connectivity Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. pp. 1-19

pp. 195-208

2013;**22**:2111-2130

p. 121

[3] Jax K, Roozi R. Ecological theory and

conservation goals. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural. 2004;**77**:349-366

[2] Loreau M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges. Science. 2001;**294**:804-808

values in the determination of

[4] Lindenmayer D, Franklin J. Conserving Forest Biodiversity: A Comprehensive Multiscaled Approach. Washington DC: Island Press; 2002. p. 352

[5] Harrison S, Fahrig L. Landscape pattern and population conservation. In: Hansson L, Fahrig L, Merriam G, editors. Mosaic Landscapes and

& Hall; 1995. pp. 293-308

Bioscience. 1995;**45**:29-35

Univ. Press; 1988. p. 376

p. 467

p. 417

**137**

Ecological Processes. London: Chapman

[7] West D, Shugart H, Botkin D. Forest Succession. NY: Springer-Verlag; 1981

[8] Tilman D. Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton NJ: Princeton

[9] Oliver C, Larson B. Forests Stand Dynamics. NY: McGraw-Hill; 1990.

[10] Grime J. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes and Ecosystem Properties. Bafins Lane: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.

[11] Hooper D, Solan M, Symstad A, Diaz S, Gessner M, Buchmann N, et al.

[6] Turner M, Gardner R, O'Neill R. Ecological dynamics at broad scales.
