**Author details**

*Recent Advances in Biomechanics*

**Figure 27.**

*Sawbones with polyaxial angular stability (PAS) plate, monoaxial plate (MAS), or classic T plate (T).*

In conclusion, the polyaxial angular stability plate offers not only an improved placement option for the screws but also a lower risk of reduction loss than the

*(A) No deformations at the PAS plate under load and (B) the closing of the osteotomy segment at T plate under* 

The authors enhance the advantages of these innovative implants for difficult clinical trauma cases. For supracondylar fractures simulated on plastic composite bones, DCS is better than CBP in most loading tests. In complex midshaft humeral fracture, the shorter locked plate (LCP—Synthes) seems to be the most rigid implant; the intramedullary nail proved to be the most elastic, while the DCP

**126**

monoaxial plate or T plate [43].

**8. Conclusions**

**Figure 28.**

*load.*

Paul-Dan Sirbu1 \*, Wilhelm Friedl2 , Dan Mihailescu1 , Liliana Savin1 , Andrei Scripcaru1 , Norin Forna1 , Mihnea Theodor Sirbu1 , Mihaela Pertea1 and Razvan Cosmin Tudor3

1 Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania


\*Address all correspondence to: pdsirbu@yahoo.com

© 2020 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
