**Author details**

Enéas Ricardo Konzen1 \* and Maria Imaculada Zucchi2,3

1 Interdisciplinary Department, Center of Limnological, Coastal and Marine Studies, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Imbé, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

2 Secretary of Agriculture and Supply of São Paulo State, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil

3 Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

\*Address all correspondence to: erkonzen@gmail.com

© 2020 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**113**

*Landscape Genetics: From Classic Molecular Markers to Genomics*

Towards a landscape genomics approach to adaptation. Molecular Ecology.

[9] Li Y, Zhang XX, Mao RL, Yang J, Miao CY, Li Z, et al. Ten years of landscape genomics: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Plant

[10] Storfer A, Patton A, Fraik AK. Navigating the interface between landscape genetics and landscape genomics. Frontiers in Genetics.

[11] Kalia RK, Rai MK, Kalia S, Singh R, Dhawan AK. Microsatellite markers: An overview of the recent progress in plants. Euphytica.

[12] Vieira MLC, Santini L, Diniz AL, Munhoz CDF. Microsatellite markers: What they mean and why they are so useful. Genetics and Molecular Biology.

[13] Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, Hanafey M, Vogel J, Tingey S, et al. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Molecular Breeding. 1996;**2**(3):225-238

[14] Abdul-Muneer PM. Application of microsatellite markers in conservation genetics and fisheries management: Recent advances in population structure analysis and conservation strategies. Genetics Research International.

[15] Nadeem MA, Nawaz MA, Shahid MQ, Doğan Y, Comertpay G, Yıldız M, et al. DNA molecular markers in plant breeding: Current status and recent advancements in genomic selection and genome editing. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment.

2007;**16**(18):3955-3969

Science. 2017;**8**:2136

2011;**177**(3):309-334

2016;**39**(3):312-328

2014;**2014**:1-11

2018;**32**(2):261-285

2018;**9**:68

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92022*

[2] Williams JG, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ,

arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research.

[1] Lewontin RC, Hubby JL. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of *Drosophila pseudoobscura*.

Genetics. 1966;**54**(2):595

1990;**18**(22):6531-6535

1995;**23**:4407-4414

1989;**44**(3):397

1993;**21**:1111-1115

2003;**18**(4):189-197

Rafalski JA, Tingey SV. DNA polymorphisms amplified by

[3] Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Lee TV, Hornes M, et al. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research.

[4] Litt M, Luty JA. A hypervariable microsatellite revealed by in vitro amplification of a dinucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle actin gene. American Journal of Human Genetics.

[5] Lagercrantz U, Ellegren H,

differs between plants and

[6] Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P. Landscape genetics: Combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

Kakanuga T. The abundance of various polymorphic microsatellite motifs

vertebrates. Nucleic Acids Research.

[7] Storfer A, Murphy MA, Evans JS, Goldberg CS, Robinson S, Spear SF, et al. Putting the 'landscape' in landscape genetics. Heredity. 2007;**98**(3):128

[8] Joost S, Bonin A, Bruford MW, Després L, Conord C, Erhardt G, et al. A spatial analysis method (SAM) to detect candidate loci for selection:

**References**

*Landscape Genetics: From Classic Molecular Markers to Genomics DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92022*
