*3.2.2 Multivariate analysis of 2009 cohort*

*Occupational Wellbeing*

**cohorts**

2009 (**Table 2**).

practice of Medicine

*3.2.1 Univariate analysis of 2009 cohort*

ing medical practice (p < 10−3).

Marital status NS

No Alcohol NS Medical curriculum **NS**

e. Satisfaction with the choice of medical curriculum and expectations of the

The rate of students who deliberately chose to lead a medical career has signifi-

However, there was no significant difference between both cohorts in satisfac-

Workplace bullying was significantly linked to younger age (p = <10−3), occupational status of intern (p = <10−3), surgical specialties (p = 0.046), shorter seniority at work (p = 0.003), serious family problems (p = 0.001), as well as to disappoint-

All the remaining socio-demographic, occupational or environmental features had no significant relationship with bullying at work in interns and residents in

Occupational Status < 10−3 0.3 [0.1–0.5] NS 0.3 [0.24–0.6]

Specialty (Surgery) 0.04 0.14 [0.03–0.6] 1.7 [1.1–2.7]

**p OR IC95% p OR IC95%**

**Characteristics 2009 cohort 2016 cohort**

Age (Younger) < 10−3 0.00 Gender (Female) 0.08 NS

(Interm) < 10−3

Seniority (Shorter) 0.00 0.016 Children (N) NS 0.004 Serious Family 0.00 NS Problems NS NS Distance to work(km) 0.05 NS Public Means of 0.17 NS transport NS NS Leisure activities NS NS No Smoking NS NS

Medical practice < **10−3** 2.5 [1.52–4.16] < **10−3** Satisfaction < **10−3**

*Univariate analysis of determinants of work bullying in both cohorts.*

cantly increased between 2009 (78.9%) and 2016 (85.4%) (p = 0.01).

**3.2 Analytical study of the determinants of workplace bullying in both** 

tion with medical practicing expectations (**Table 1**).

**196**

**Table 2.**

choice

After binary logistic regression, the determinant model influencing the advent of MHW was made of intern job position (p < 10−3), female gender (p < 10−3), shorter seniority (p = 0.02), the deliberate choice of medical career (p < 10−3), dissatisfaction with medical practice (p < 10−3), serious family problems (p < 10−3) and lack of leisure activities (p = 0.01) (**Table 3**).
