**Author details**

Kang Li Zayed University, Abu Dhabi, UAE

\*Address all correspondence to: kang.li@zu.ac.ae

© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**91**

12(7), 623-644.

*Gain or Loss? The Effect of Ad Framing on the Intention to Control Sugar Intake*

gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59, 296-316.

[9] O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2010). The relative effectiveness of gainframed and loss-framed persuasive appeals concerning obesity related behaviors: Meta-analytic evidence and implications. In R. Batra, P. A. Keller, & V. J. Strecher (Eds.), Leveraging consumer psychology for effective health communications (pp. 171-185). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe Inc.

[10] Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43(1), 101-116.

effectiveness of gain-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behavior: Is all hope lost? Journal of Health Communication, 12(7), 645-649.

[12] Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.

[13] Higgins, E. T. (1999). Promotion and prevention as a motivational duality: Implications for evaluative processes. In S. Chaiken and Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 503-525). New York,

[14] Lee, A. Y., and Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

[15] Zhao, G., & Pechmann, C. (2007). The impact of regulatory focus on adolescents' response to antismoking

NY: The Guilford Press.

86(2), 205-218.

[11] Latimer, A. E., Salovey, P., & Rothman, A. J. (2007). The

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95779*

[1] Johnson, R. K., Appel, L. J., Brands, M., Howard, B. V., Lefevre, M., Lustig, R. H., … and Wylie-Rosett, J. (2009). Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health a scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation,

[2] Null, G. (2014, March 13). Sugar: killing us sweetly. Staggering health consequences of sugar on health of Americans. Global Research. Retrieved from http://www.globalresearch.ca/ sugar-killing-us-sweetly/5367250

[3] Branswell, H. (2014, March 5). Eating sugar causes massive health problems, says WHO. The Canadian Press. Retrieved from http://www. huffingtonpost.ca/2014/03/05/eating-

[4] Jung, W. S., & Villegas, J. (2011). The effects of message framing, involvement, and nicotine dependence

on anti-smoking public service announcements. Health Marketing

[5] Covey, J. (2014). The role of dispositional factors in moderating message framing effects. Health Psychology, 33(1), 52-65.

[7] O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication,

[8] O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of

[6] O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2006). The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gainframed and loss-framed messages. Communication Yearbook, 30, 1-43.

Quarterly, 28(3), 219-231.

sugar\_n\_4903790.html

**References**

120(11), 1011-1020.

*Gain or Loss? The Effect of Ad Framing on the Intention to Control Sugar Intake DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95779*
