**Author details**

Sarah Wilson1 , Michael Crozier2 and Antonios El Helou3 \*

1 Dalhousie Medical School, New Brunswick, Canada

2 Department of General Surgery, The Moncton Hospital, Horizon Health Network, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

3 Department of Neurosurgery, The Moncton Hospital, Horizon Health Network, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

\*Address all correspondence to: dr.antonios.elhelou@horizonnb.ca

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**75**

*Neuronavigated and Laparoscopic-Assisted Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement*

diagnosed on plain radiographs. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology.

2018;**47**(5):317-323

[9] He M, Ouyang L, Wang S,

Zheng M, Liu A. Laparoscopy versus mini-laparotomy peritoneal catheter insertion of ventriculoperitoneal shunts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgical Focus. 2016;**41**(3):E7

[10] Rigante L, Navarro R, Roser F. Minimal exposure maximal precision ventriculoperitoneal shunt: How I do it. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2019;**161**(8):1619-1622

[11] Hanna RS, Essa AA, Makhlouf GA, Helmy AA. Comparative study between laparoscopic and open techniques for insertion of Ventriculperitoneal shunt for treatment of congenital

Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical

[12] Roth J, Sagie B, Szold A, Elran H. Laparoscopic versus non–laparoscopicassisted ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in adults. A retrospective analysis. Surgical Neurology.

hydrocephalus. Journal of

2007;**68**(2):177-184

2018;**41**(4):969-981

Techniques. 2019;**29**(1):109-113

[13] Ros B, Iglesias S, Martín Á,

Carrasco A, Ibáñez G, Arráez MA. Shunt overdrainage syndrome: Review of the literature. Neurosurgical Review.

[14] Naftel RP, Argo JL, Shannon CN, Taylor TH, Tubbs RS, Clements RH, et al. Laparoscopic versus open insertion

ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: Review of 810 consecutive cases. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2011;**115**(1):151-158

[15] Gilard V, Magne N, Gerardin E, Curey S, Pelletier V, Hannequin P, et al. Comparison of electromagnetic neuronavigation system and free-hand

of the peritoneal catheter in

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89252*

[1] Rekate HL. A contemporary definition and classification of hydrocephalus. Seminars in Pediatric

[2] Shaw R, Everingham E, Mahant N, Jacobson E, Owler B. Clinical outcomes in the surgical treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2016;**29**:81-86

[3] Gutierrez-Murgas Y, Snowden JN.

[4] Phan S, Liao J, Jia F, Maharaj M, Reddy R, Mobbs RJ, et al. Laparotomy vs minimally invasive laparoscopic ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement for hydrocephalus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2016;**140**:26-32

[5] Dehcordi SR, De Tommasi C, Ricci A, Marzi S, Ruscitti C, Amicucci G, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery: Personal experience and review of the literature. Neurosurgical

[6] Nguyen TA, Cohen PR. Scalp necrosis

Review. 2011;**34**(3):363-371

overlying a ventriculoperitoneal shunt: a case report and literature review. Dermatology Online Journal. 2015;**21**(10). Retrieved from: https:// escholarship.org/uc/item/2rs544f9

[7] Hung CC, Chuang HY, Lin HL, Chu YT, Cheng CH. Intramuscular migration of venous catheter as a rare complication of Ventriculoatrial shunt: Case report and literature review. Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery.

[8] Bates P, Rajderkar D. Common

ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction

2017;**78**(04):412-416

and uncommon causes of

Ventricular shunt infections: Immunopathogenesis and clinical management. Journal of Neuroimmunology. 2014;**276**(1-2):1-8

Neurology. 2009;**16**(1):9-15

**References**

*Neuronavigated and Laparoscopic-Assisted Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89252*
