**Chapter 5**

Operational Research. 2015;242:

343-346. DOI: 10.1016/j.

Mass Production Processes

[16] Chutima P, Suchanun T.

10.14743/apem2019.1.311

1511-1530. DOI: 10.1080/ 00207548908942637

423-434

1469-1483

Productivity improvement with parallel adjacent U-shaped assembly lines. Advances in Production Engineering & Management. 2019;14(1):51-64. DOI:

forms of binary matrices in group technology. International Journal of Production Research. 1990;28(2):

[25] Won Y, Currie K. An effective pmedian model considering production factors in machine cell-part family formation. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2006;25(1):58-64. DOI: 10.1016/S0278-6125(06)80033-6

233-243. DOI: 10.1080/ 00207549008942706

[17] Wemmerlöv U, Hyer N. Cellular manufacturing in the US industry: A survey of users. International Journal of Production Research. 1988;27(9):

[18] Macaskill JLC. Production-line balances for mixed-model lines. Management Science. 1972;19(4):

[19] Ahmadi RH, Wurgaft H. Design for synchronized flow manufacturing. Management Science. 1994;40(11):

[20] Urban TL. Optimal balancing of Ushaped assembly lines. Management

[21] Al Kattan I. Workload balance of cells in designing of multiple cellular manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Technology

Management. 2005;16(2):178-196. DOI:

[22] Burbidge JL. The Introduction to Group Technology. Nueva York: John

[23] Seifoddini H, Hsu CP. Comparative study of similarity coefficients and clustering algorithms in cellular manufacturing. Journal of

Manufacturing Systems. 1994;13(2):

[24] Kumar KR, Chandrasekharan MP. Grouping efficacy: A quantitative criterion for goodness of block diagonal

Science. 1998;44(5):738-741

10.1108/17410380510576822

Wiley & Sons; 1975 267p

119-127

62

ejor.2014.10.036
