**3. Literature review**

*Mass Production Processes*

**10**

**Figure 3.**

**Figure 2.**

*Schematic diagram of the friction stir welding process [22].*

FSW is shown in **Figure 2**.

*The schematic diagram showing heat energy generation and distribution during FSW process [25].*

use of consumable filler materials, no special preparation of the welding sample is required and can eliminate welding defects, little waste or pollution is generated during the welding process [20, 21]. Friction stir welding offers distinguish advantages like ease of handling by precise external process control and can create homogeneous welds with high levels of repeatability [21]. The working principle of

In FSW, cylindrical rotating tool consisting of a concentric threaded pin and tool shoulder are used for welding the parts. A non-consumable rotating tool along with specially designed pin and shoulder is attached at the faying edges of the plates to be joined and traversed along the welded joint. The clamps are used to fix the two sheets on the bed and force is applied vertically to fix the tool on the collect of vertical milling machine. The friction between the welding tool i.e. rotating tool and workpiece is generated due to rotation of rotation tool on the plated to be welded which leads to plastic deformation of work piece. The plates get soften at the around the pin due to generation localized heat from the friction and the combination of tool rotation and translation leads the movement of the soften material from front of the pin to back of the pin. The welded joint is formed by deforming the material at temperatures below the melting point of parent material. If the direction of tool rotation and translation of the welding tool in same direction, then it is called advancing side whereas both the motions in opposite direction then it is

As mentioned earlier that fusion based welding of aluminum alloys is difficult because of limited weldability. Some aluminum alloys can be resistance welded but the surface preparation is problematic, and time consuming and surface oxide is being a major problem during welding [26] On the other hand, FSW can be used join most of the aluminum alloys without any surface oxide problems and no special cleaning is required prior to welding. Some of the research publications which reported to literature based on friction stir welding of aluminum alloys are discussed as follows:

Rhodes et al. [26] had been made an experimental analysis to study the significance of welding process on weld nugget (WN), heat affected zone (HAZ) and microstructural changes of FSWed 7075 aluminum alloy material. They stated from the study that friction stir welding process was useful to join unweldable aluminum alloys without introducing a cast microstructure and it was not influencing much on WN, HAZ and microstructure of welded joint compared to fusion welding techniques. Jata et al. [27] were investigated the effects of FSW method on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded aluminum alloy 7050- T7451. Researchers observed from analysis that FSW process transforms the initial millimeter sized pancake-shaped grains in the parent work-material to fine 1 to 5 micrometer dynamically recrystallized grains and it also redissolves the strengthening precipitates in the weld-nugget area. The fatigue strength of welded specimen depends on the bonding between the intergranular mechanism. Frigaard et al. [4] had been studied the microstructure evolution and its effects on hardness distribution of FSWed samples of AA6082-T6 and AA7108-T79 aluminum alloys with the use of numerical three-dimensional heat flow model. They observed that thermal effects were main reasons behind the strength losses of welded samples during FSW of age hardening aluminum alloys. This was because of high level welding speeds which introduces plastic deformation resulting initiation of the dissolution of hardening precipitates. The grain structure within the plastically deformed region was analyzed by electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) technique in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and stated that dynamic recovery is significant softening procedure for FSW of age hardening aluminum alloys. Lee et al. [28] had made an investigation-based on experiments study to enhance welding process performance of FSW of A356 Al alloy. Liu et al. [20] had made an experimental investigation to study, analyze the effects of process welding parameters on tensile properties of friction stir welded 2017-T351 aluminum alloy and optimum welding parameters to attain better quality response of weldment. They observed from analysis that tensile properties and fracture locations of the welded joints are significantly affected by the friction stir process parameters. Peel et al. [21] had made a research analysis on welded samples of aluminum AA5083 in friction stir welds process. They studied the influences of varied process conditions on microstructural, mechanical property and residual stress. They observed from the work that there is uncertainty of weld quality characteristics with varying welding speeds. Researchers mentioned in their research that thermal input is most significantly affecting welding responses than the mechanical deformation created by the tool.

Fersini and Pirondi [29] had been conducted a research work to study and analyze the fatigue behavior of friction stir welded aluminum alloy Al2024- T3 materials. Shen et al. [30] had been studied the mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of aluminum alloy AA 6061-T4 sheets in friction stir spot welding. Kah et al. [31] had been investigated the weld defects in aluminum alloys welded by friction stir welding and fusion welding. Researchers found that defects in aluminum alloy welds are less as compared to the fusion welds. Effertz et al. [32] had been analyzed and optimized the process welding parameters in friction spot welding of 7050-T76 aluminum alloy. They stated that process parameters in friction spot welding were highly influential for quality responses of weldment. Guo et al. [33] had been studied the fatigue performance of aluminum friction stir welded joints. Kaushik and Singhal [34] had made an experimental investigation to analyze the influences of FSW process on microstructure and mechanical properties of cast composite matrix AA6063 reinforced with 7 wt % SiC particles. They mentioned from the study that FSW had impacts on the growth, dissolution and reprecipitation of the hardening precipitates during welding. Mechanical properties like ultimate tensile strength, percentage elongation, hardness, of friction stir welded joint improved due to microstructural changes taken place during FSW process. Behrouz et al. [35] had investigated the effect of vibration on microstructure and thermal properties of Al5083 welded specimen made by friction stir spot welding (FSSW). They conducted experiments at rotation speed of 1500 rpm and different dwelling times. They observed from their study that vibration during FSSW leads to decrease of grain size weld region thereby improved mechanical properties. Kunitaka et al. [36] had been developed the corner adstir fillet stationary shoulder FSW (SSFSW) process for welding of the reinforced fillet joints. The welding of reinforced fillet welded is difficult with conventional FSW due to complexity and unpractical joint preparation. Researchers were observed better mechanical properties in reinforced fillet welded joints as like conventional FS welds. Silva et al. [37] had been studied the temperature distribution around a FSW tool on bead-on-plate welds in 20 mm thickness aluminum alloy, AA6082-T6. Shen [38] had been evaluated the weld performance in terms of microstructure, interfacial bonding, hardness, static and fatigue strength of 7075-T6 Al alloy welded joint in refill friction stir spot welding using a modified tool based on the experimental analysis.

Dissimilar welding is an important research area for many industrial applications. Joining two different materials to create cost effective product is difficult task due different materials properties and varying melting points [21]. Welding of aluminum alloys with other materials has huge industrial requirement. Friction stir welding (FSW) is extended to join various un-weldable aluminum alloys within other aluminum alloys and also with other materials like steel, manganese, etc. Some of the dissimilar welding of aluminum alloys with other materials are discussed as follows:

Cavaliere et al. [13] had been analyzed the mechanical and metallurgical properties of dissimilar friction stir welded aluminum alloys 2024 and 7075 respectively. After welding experiments, the microstructure of weldment had been investigated by optical microscopy and observed that grain structure and precipitates distribution differences initiated during welding process. Mechanical behavior of welded samples had been tested by performing tensile and fatigue tests. From the research analysis, they mentioned that proper understanding

**13**

*Recent Advances in Joining of Aluminum Alloys by Using Friction Stir Welding*

and correct selection of process variables are very crucial for optimal conduction of FSW process to obtain desired welding performance. Yutaka et al. [39] were discussed the influences of varied rotation speeds on microstructure and hardness of friction stir welded aluminum (Al) alloys 6063-T5 and T4. Researchers analyzed the relationships between the microstructure and mechanical properties of welded specimens. They observed that grain size of the stir zone increased exponentially with increasing of temperature. The hardness values in welded condition in weld center in weld of Aluminum alloy 6063-T5 and distributed homogeneously in the weld of Aluminum alloy 6063-T4. The effects of rotation speeds on hardness of weldment were insignificant except softened region of aluminum alloy 6063-T5. Song et al. [40] had been analyzed the mechanical properties of friction stir lap welded dissimilar AA2024–AA7075 aluminum alloy materials. They were also studied the defects in the welded joints and found good quality welds without major defects. Shen et al. [41] were made an experimental research to determine the influences of welding input parameters on interfacial bonding in dissimilar steel/aluminum friction stir welds. Investigators stated that control parameters were most significant for quality of the welded joint of dissimilar aluminum alloy and steel materials in friction stir welding. Ding et al. [42] had also been studied the quality levels of dissimilar aluminum alloy and AISI coated steel in friction stir welding process. They found better weld qualities and stated that FSW was better welding method for joining of aluminum alloys to steel materials. Tianhao et al. [43] had been applied friction stir scribe (FSS) technique to join the dissimilar aluminum alloy and mild steel materials. The difference between the FSW and FSS are reduced heat is supplied in FSS during dissimilar welding because of varying melting points of materials to be joined. They studied the fracture modes of welded joints under tensile shear loading. They observed from the study that fracture mode and quality of joint was highly depends on welding process param-

Raju et al. [44] had been investigated the significances of friction stir parameters on responses: microstructure and corrosion of friction stir welded AA6061-T6 and AISI304 materials. They analyzed the effect of process variables on microstructures, intermetallic compounds and their phases, and thereby on corrosion of the aluminum-steel welded joint and stated that quality of welded joint depends on the correct selection of process parameters in FSW of dissimilar materials. Gopkalo [45] had analyzed the microstructure in heat affected zone (HAZ) of dissimilar friction stir welded age hardened Al-Mg-Zn and Al-Mg-Si alloys. Li et al. [46] had been studied the influences of friction parameters namely welding speed and rotational speed on microstructure and tensile strength in FSW of dissimilar AZ91 magnesium (Mg) alloy and A383 aluminum (AL) alloy materials. They stated from the study that optimum selection of process parameters was necessary to obtain defect free welded joint of AZ91 Mg alloy and A383 al alloy in friction stir welding. Jedrasiak and Shercliff [47] had been developed a finite element model to predict the spatial and temporal variation of heat generation and temperature in friction stir spot welding of aluminum and magnesium alloys. Guo et al. [33] had conducted research analysis to study the dependency of fatigue performance in friction stir welding of dissimilar 6061-T651 and 5083-H321 aluminum alloys. They observed from the investigation that kissing bond defect had significant effect on fatigue life and toe-flash defect had small or less effect on fatigue performance of dissimilar 6061-T651 and 5083-H321 aluminum alloys friction stir welds. Pratik et al. [48] studied the effects of cylindrical tool pin profile on macrostructure, microstructure, and tensile property of welded sample of dissimilar aluminum alloys AA6061 and AA7075 when other process parameters: tool traverse feed kept at 31.5 mm/s, tool rotational speed kept at 765 rpm, and tool tilt angle of 2° forward position. They

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89382*

eters and tool scribe height.

#### *Recent Advances in Joining of Aluminum Alloys by Using Friction Stir Welding DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89382*

and correct selection of process variables are very crucial for optimal conduction of FSW process to obtain desired welding performance. Yutaka et al. [39] were discussed the influences of varied rotation speeds on microstructure and hardness of friction stir welded aluminum (Al) alloys 6063-T5 and T4. Researchers analyzed the relationships between the microstructure and mechanical properties of welded specimens. They observed that grain size of the stir zone increased exponentially with increasing of temperature. The hardness values in welded condition in weld center in weld of Aluminum alloy 6063-T5 and distributed homogeneously in the weld of Aluminum alloy 6063-T4. The effects of rotation speeds on hardness of weldment were insignificant except softened region of aluminum alloy 6063-T5. Song et al. [40] had been analyzed the mechanical properties of friction stir lap welded dissimilar AA2024–AA7075 aluminum alloy materials. They were also studied the defects in the welded joints and found good quality welds without major defects. Shen et al. [41] were made an experimental research to determine the influences of welding input parameters on interfacial bonding in dissimilar steel/aluminum friction stir welds. Investigators stated that control parameters were most significant for quality of the welded joint of dissimilar aluminum alloy and steel materials in friction stir welding. Ding et al. [42] had also been studied the quality levels of dissimilar aluminum alloy and AISI coated steel in friction stir welding process. They found better weld qualities and stated that FSW was better welding method for joining of aluminum alloys to steel materials. Tianhao et al. [43] had been applied friction stir scribe (FSS) technique to join the dissimilar aluminum alloy and mild steel materials. The difference between the FSW and FSS are reduced heat is supplied in FSS during dissimilar welding because of varying melting points of materials to be joined. They studied the fracture modes of welded joints under tensile shear loading. They observed from the study that fracture mode and quality of joint was highly depends on welding process parameters and tool scribe height.

Raju et al. [44] had been investigated the significances of friction stir parameters on responses: microstructure and corrosion of friction stir welded AA6061-T6 and AISI304 materials. They analyzed the effect of process variables on microstructures, intermetallic compounds and their phases, and thereby on corrosion of the aluminum-steel welded joint and stated that quality of welded joint depends on the correct selection of process parameters in FSW of dissimilar materials. Gopkalo [45] had analyzed the microstructure in heat affected zone (HAZ) of dissimilar friction stir welded age hardened Al-Mg-Zn and Al-Mg-Si alloys. Li et al. [46] had been studied the influences of friction parameters namely welding speed and rotational speed on microstructure and tensile strength in FSW of dissimilar AZ91 magnesium (Mg) alloy and A383 aluminum (AL) alloy materials. They stated from the study that optimum selection of process parameters was necessary to obtain defect free welded joint of AZ91 Mg alloy and A383 al alloy in friction stir welding. Jedrasiak and Shercliff [47] had been developed a finite element model to predict the spatial and temporal variation of heat generation and temperature in friction stir spot welding of aluminum and magnesium alloys. Guo et al. [33] had conducted research analysis to study the dependency of fatigue performance in friction stir welding of dissimilar 6061-T651 and 5083-H321 aluminum alloys. They observed from the investigation that kissing bond defect had significant effect on fatigue life and toe-flash defect had small or less effect on fatigue performance of dissimilar 6061-T651 and 5083-H321 aluminum alloys friction stir welds. Pratik et al. [48] studied the effects of cylindrical tool pin profile on macrostructure, microstructure, and tensile property of welded sample of dissimilar aluminum alloys AA6061 and AA7075 when other process parameters: tool traverse feed kept at 31.5 mm/s, tool rotational speed kept at 765 rpm, and tool tilt angle of 2° forward position. They

*Mass Production Processes*

by the tool.

on microstructural, mechanical property and residual stress. They observed from the work that there is uncertainty of weld quality characteristics with varying welding speeds. Researchers mentioned in their research that thermal input is most significantly affecting welding responses than the mechanical deformation created

Fersini and Pirondi [29] had been conducted a research work to study and analyze the fatigue behavior of friction stir welded aluminum alloy Al2024- T3 materials. Shen et al. [30] had been studied the mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of aluminum alloy AA 6061-T4 sheets in friction stir spot welding. Kah et al. [31] had been investigated the weld defects in aluminum alloys welded by friction stir welding and fusion welding. Researchers found that defects in aluminum alloy welds are less as compared to the fusion welds. Effertz et al. [32] had been analyzed and optimized the process welding parameters in friction spot welding of 7050-T76 aluminum alloy. They stated that process parameters in friction spot welding were highly influential for quality responses of weldment. Guo et al. [33] had been studied the fatigue performance of aluminum friction stir welded joints. Kaushik and Singhal [34] had made an experimental investigation to analyze the influences of FSW process on microstructure and mechanical properties of cast composite matrix AA6063 reinforced with 7 wt % SiC particles. They mentioned from the study that FSW had impacts on the growth, dissolution and reprecipitation of the hardening precipitates during welding. Mechanical properties like ultimate tensile strength, percentage elongation, hardness, of friction stir welded joint improved due to microstructural changes taken place during FSW process. Behrouz et al. [35] had investigated the effect of vibration on microstructure and thermal properties of Al5083 welded specimen made by friction stir spot welding (FSSW). They conducted experiments at rotation speed of 1500 rpm and different dwelling times. They observed from their study that vibration during FSSW leads to decrease of grain size weld region thereby improved mechanical properties. Kunitaka et al. [36] had been developed the corner adstir fillet stationary shoulder FSW (SSFSW) process for welding of the reinforced fillet joints. The welding of reinforced fillet welded is difficult with conventional FSW due to complexity and unpractical joint preparation. Researchers were observed better mechanical properties in reinforced fillet welded joints as like conventional FS welds. Silva et al. [37] had been studied the temperature distribution around a FSW tool on bead-on-plate welds in 20 mm thickness aluminum alloy, AA6082-T6. Shen [38] had been evaluated the weld performance in terms of microstructure, interfacial bonding, hardness, static and fatigue strength of 7075-T6 Al alloy welded joint in refill friction stir spot welding

using a modified tool based on the experimental analysis.

Dissimilar welding is an important research area for many industrial applications. Joining two different materials to create cost effective product is difficult task due different materials properties and varying melting points [21]. Welding of aluminum alloys with other materials has huge industrial requirement. Friction stir welding (FSW) is extended to join various un-weldable aluminum alloys within other aluminum alloys and also with other materials like steel, manganese, etc. Some of the dissimilar welding of aluminum alloys with other materials are dis-

Cavaliere et al. [13] had been analyzed the mechanical and metallurgical properties of dissimilar friction stir welded aluminum alloys 2024 and 7075 respectively. After welding experiments, the microstructure of weldment had been investigated by optical microscopy and observed that grain structure and precipitates distribution differences initiated during welding process. Mechanical behavior of welded samples had been tested by performing tensile and fatigue tests. From the research analysis, they mentioned that proper understanding

**12**

cussed as follows:

stated that cylindrical tool pin profile was beneficial for obtaining defect free stir zone and better tensile properties on weldment.

From the extensive review of friction stir welding of aluminum alloys, it is stated that friction stir welding is best alternative to join almost all types of aluminum alloys. The uses of FSW can also be extended to weld dissimilar aluminum alloys and with other materials also. FSW can be used as mass production technology or fabrication process, as it does not have melting phase, no special preparation of welding joint, minimum problems related to welding metal re-solidification, uses non-consumable tool, etc. Performing FSW process to create aluminum sheets in economical manner is important area of work and it is highly depends on the proper understanding of principles of FSW, relations between the process parametric conditions and response characteristics, properties of work-piece material and welding tool, shape and geometry of welding tool, etc. More research investigations related to various aspects of FSW of similar aluminum (AL) alloys and dissimilar AL alloys and or with other materials will create a sound knowledge bank; from which industrial persons can be benefitted to conduct FSW process with enhanced efficiency. Present chapter is one step forward for making the FSW of similar and dissimilar aluminum alloys in an economical and predictive manner.
