**Author details**

Yu-Chen Lo1,3\*, Gui Ren2 , Hiroshi Honda2 and Kara L. Davis3

1 Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

2 Bioengineering, Northwestern Polytechnic University, Fremont, CA, USA

3 Pediatrics, Bass Center for Childhood Cancer, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

\*Address all correspondence to: bennylo@stanford.edu

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**159**

*Artificial Intelligence-Based Drug Design and Discovery DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89012*

Cheminformatics. 2011;**3**:33. DOI:

[8] Lovric M, Molero JM, Kern R. PySpark and RDKit: Moving towards big data in cheminformatics. Molecular Informatics. 2019;**38**(6):e1800082. DOI:

[9] Gupta A, Kumar V, Aparoy P. Role of topological, electronic, geometrical, constitutional and quantum chemical based descriptors in QSAR: mPGES-1 as a case study. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 2018;**18**(13):1075- 1090. DOI: 10.2174/15680266186661807

[10] Haggarty SJ, Clemons PA, Wong JC, Schreiber SL. Mapping chemical space using molecular descriptors and chemical genetics: Deacetylase inhibitors. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening.

[11] Sykora VJ, Leahy DE. Chemical descriptors library (CDL): A generic, open source software library for chemical informatics. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2008;**48**(10):1931-1942. DOI: 10.1021/

[12] Nettles JH, Jenkins JL, Bender A, Deng Z, Davies JW, Glick M. Bridging chemical and biological space: "Target fishing" using 2D and 3D molecular descriptors. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2006;**49**(23):6802-6810.

DOI: 10.1021/jm060902w

10.1021/ci0340714

[13] Pan D, Tseng Y, Hopfinger AJ. Quantitative structure-based design: Formalism and application of receptordependent RD-4D-QSAR analysis to a set of glucose analogue inhibitors of glycogen phosphorylase. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences. 2003;**43**(5):1591-1607. DOI:

10.1186/1758-2946-3-33

10.1002/minf.201800082

19164149

2004;**7**(7):669-676

ci800135h

**References**

drudis.2018.05.010

s00216-005-0065-y

ci00057a005

[1] Lo YC, Rensi SE, Torng W, Altman RB. Machine learning in chemoinformatics and drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today. 2018;**23**(8):1538-1546. DOI: 10.1016/j.

[2] Idakwo G, Luttrell J, Chen M,

[3] Gasteiger J. Chemoinformatics: A new field with a long tradition. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2006;**384**(1):57-64. DOI: 10.1007/

[4] Weininger D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences. 1988;**28**(1):31-36. DOI: 10.1021/

[5] O'Boyle NM. Towards a universal SMILES representation—A standard method to generate canonical SMILES

[6] Schuttelkopf AW, van Aalten DM. PRODRG: A tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography. 2004;**60**(Pt 8):1355-1363. DOI: 10.1107/

[7] O'Boyle NM, Banck M, James CA,

Morley C, Vandermeersch T, Hutchison GR. Open babel: An open chemical toolbox. Journal of

based on the InChI. Journal of Cheminformatics. 2012;**4**(1):22. DOI:

10.1186/1758-2946-4-22

S0907444904011679

Hong H, Zhou Z, Gong P, et al. A review on machine learning methods for in silico toxicity prediction. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part C, Environmental Carcinogenesis & Ecotoxicology Reviews. 2018;**36**(4):169-191. DOI: 10.1080/10590501.2018.1537118

*Artificial Intelligence-Based Drug Design and Discovery DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89012*
