**3. Crystallographic change by piercing**

*Electron Crystallography*

textures are classified into two zones. One is thin and long full-martensitic textures. The shorter and dotted textures are corresponding to the retained austenitic textures. These textured crystallographic structures are further controlled by the low temperature plasma nitriding as well as the heat treatment to be discussed in later.

*Variation of XRD diagrams from the original AISI304 sheet before rolling to AISI304 after intense rolling and* 

*EBSD analysis on the cross-section of rolled AISI304 sheet. (a) IPF mapping, (b) KAM distribution, and* 

*furthermore to rolled AISI304 sheet after low temperature plasma nitriding.*

**58**

**Figure 4.**

*(c) phase mapping.*

**Figure 3.**

Fine piercing is an essential process in metal forming for accurate drilling of holes and for fine blanking. In the last decade, metastable austenitic stainless steel type AISI304 with fine grains has been developed by [18–20]; the effects of fine crystallographic structure on the elasto-plastic deformation have been closely studied in [21–23]. **Figure 5** shows three metastable austenitic stainless steel AISI304 sheets with the thickness of 100 μm, where the grain size was reduced by rolling process from the normal-grained sheet with the average grain size (D) of 7.5 μm. Two fine-grained AISI304 sheets were yielded to have D = 3.0 and 1.5 μm, respectively, by reverse transformation of the strain-induced martensitic phase. In this thermo-mechanical treatment, near-fully martensitic grains in **Figure 4c** are inversely transformed together with reduction of grain sizes [4, 7].

Their IPF maps analyzed by EBSD were shown on the cross section in the sheet width direction. When D = 7.5 μm, most of grains have a preferred orientation to [111] direction, as shown in **Figure 5a**. The crystallographic structure for D = 3 and 1.5 μm became nearly the same as D = 7.5 μm as depicted in **Figure 5b** and **c**.

### **3.1 Microstructure evolution by piercing**

These AISI304 sheets with different grain sizes were pierced by CNC stamper under the same conditions; e.g., the punch diameter was 100 μm, the die diameter, 110 μm, and the clearance, 5% of sheet thickness. **Figure 6** compares IPF mapping as well as phase mapping on the cross-section of punched hole among three AISI304 sheets with the different grain size by D = 1.5, 3.0, and 7.5 μm. As commonly seen in **Figure 6a**–**c**, most of grains along the side surface of hole are distorted and refined in size. The shearing of AISI304 sheet by piercing leaves the process-affected zones along the shearing plane. The phase mapping in **Figure 5d**–**f** reveals that these process-affected zones are just corresponding to the martensitic phase [24]. That is, the original austenitic matrix to AISI304 sheets is forced to transform to martensite by the shearing strain during the piercing process. This strain-induced martensitic transformation is a non-diffusive shear transformation; each grain in the affectedprocess zone massively makes transformation [25, 26].

#### **Figure 5.**

*IPF map and intensity map in the ND direction analyzed by EBSD. (a) Normal-grained AISI304 sheet with F = 7.5 μm, (b) fine-grained AISI304 sheet with D = 3.0 μm, and (c) fine-grained sheet with D = 1.5 μm.*

**Figure 6.**

*EBSD analyses of IPF mapping in the ND direction and phase mapping on the cross-section of punched AISI304 sheet. (a) IPF map at D = 1.5 μm, (b) IPF map at D = 3 μm, (c) IPF map at D = 7.5 μm, (d) phase map at D = 1.5 μm, (e) phase map at D = 3 μm, and (f) phase map at D = 7.5 μm.*

Let us consider the effect of average grain size on this formation of affectedprocess zones with phase transformation. When D = 7.5 μm, the zone boundary between the austenitic and martensitic phases is shaped to be irregularly jagged in **Figure 6d**. With decreasing the grain size, this phase boundary gradually is homogenized to be smooth as seen in **Figure 6e** and **f**. To be noticed, the volume of straininduced martensitic phase in **Figure 6f** becomes larger than that in **Figure 6e**. This increase of strain-induced martensitic phase volume ratio causes the variation of the fracture length of the hole at the punch stroke direction [24].

### **3.2 Controlled crystallographic structure by piercing**

The strain induced phase transformation in the process-affected zones by piercing is commonly observed in the metastable austenitic stainless steel sheets. Among them, the chemical components in each class of stainless steels have influence on the microstructure change by the piercing process. Two types of metastable austenitic stainless steel sheets were prepared as a work sheet with the thickness of 100 μm for piercing experiments under the same conditions as shown in **Figure 6**.

**61**

**Figure 7.**

*Micro-/Nano-Structuring in Stainless Steels by Metal Forming and Materials Processing*

sheet, the strain-induced martensitic phase hardly occurred along the shearing plane; no martensitic phase was present in **Figure 7a**. Instead of martensitic phase maps, the ferritic phase was strain-induced even by this piercing process as predicted by [27]. In fact, much ferrite was detected at the vicinity of die corner in **Figure 7a**. Let us consider why no martensitic phase but ferritic phase is induced by piercing the AISI316L sheet. As stated in [27], the nominal strain to induce the martensitic phase into AISI316L is two times larger than that to induce the ferrite phase. Hence, when piercing AISI3016L sheet, the ferritic phase is much easier to be induced than the martensitic phase. Therefore, even when the ferrite phase is induced along the shearing plane by the piercing process, each grain deformation is not hindered by shearing. As a result, the process-affected zone area in AISI316L becomes larger along the shearing plane in **Figure 7a** than that in AISI304 in

The difference of crystallographic structure between pierced AISI304 and AISI316L sheets reveals that the process-affected zone formation could be controlled by the strain-induced phase transformation during the piercing process. EBSD analysis is really a well-defined means to describe the relationship between the strain-induced phase transformation by piercing and the crystallographic

*Comparison of phase mapping on the cross-section of fully pierced AISI316L and AISI304 austenitic stainless* 

*steel sheets. (a) Punched-out AISI316L sheet and (b) punched-out AISI304 sheet.*

**Figure 7** compares the phase mapping on the cross-section of punched holes between the stainless steel AISI316L and AISI304. When punching out the AISI316L

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91281*

structure of pierced stainless steel sheets.

**Figure 7b** [28].

*Micro-/Nano-Structuring in Stainless Steels by Metal Forming and Materials Processing DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91281*

**Figure 7** compares the phase mapping on the cross-section of punched holes between the stainless steel AISI316L and AISI304. When punching out the AISI316L sheet, the strain-induced martensitic phase hardly occurred along the shearing plane; no martensitic phase was present in **Figure 7a**. Instead of martensitic phase maps, the ferritic phase was strain-induced even by this piercing process as predicted by [27]. In fact, much ferrite was detected at the vicinity of die corner in **Figure 7a**. Let us consider why no martensitic phase but ferritic phase is induced by piercing the AISI316L sheet. As stated in [27], the nominal strain to induce the martensitic phase into AISI316L is two times larger than that to induce the ferrite phase. Hence, when piercing AISI3016L sheet, the ferritic phase is much easier to be induced than the martensitic phase. Therefore, even when the ferrite phase is induced along the shearing plane by the piercing process, each grain deformation is not hindered by shearing. As a result, the process-affected zone area in AISI316L becomes larger along the shearing plane in **Figure 7a** than that in AISI304 in **Figure 7b** [28].

The difference of crystallographic structure between pierced AISI304 and AISI316L sheets reveals that the process-affected zone formation could be controlled by the strain-induced phase transformation during the piercing process. EBSD analysis is really a well-defined means to describe the relationship between the strain-induced phase transformation by piercing and the crystallographic structure of pierced stainless steel sheets.

**Figure 7.**

*Comparison of phase mapping on the cross-section of fully pierced AISI316L and AISI304 austenitic stainless steel sheets. (a) Punched-out AISI316L sheet and (b) punched-out AISI304 sheet.*

*Electron Crystallography*

**60**

**Figure 6.**

shown in **Figure 6**.

Let us consider the effect of average grain size on this formation of affectedprocess zones with phase transformation. When D = 7.5 μm, the zone boundary between the austenitic and martensitic phases is shaped to be irregularly jagged in **Figure 6d**. With decreasing the grain size, this phase boundary gradually is homogenized to be smooth as seen in **Figure 6e** and **f**. To be noticed, the volume of straininduced martensitic phase in **Figure 6f** becomes larger than that in **Figure 6e**. This increase of strain-induced martensitic phase volume ratio causes the variation of

*EBSD analyses of IPF mapping in the ND direction and phase mapping on the cross-section of punched AISI304 sheet. (a) IPF map at D = 1.5 μm, (b) IPF map at D = 3 μm, (c) IPF map at D = 7.5 μm, (d) phase* 

The strain induced phase transformation in the process-affected zones by piercing is commonly observed in the metastable austenitic stainless steel sheets. Among them, the chemical components in each class of stainless steels have influence on the microstructure change by the piercing process. Two types of metastable austenitic stainless steel sheets were prepared as a work sheet with the thickness of 100 μm for piercing experiments under the same conditions as

the fracture length of the hole at the punch stroke direction [24].

*map at D = 1.5 μm, (e) phase map at D = 3 μm, and (f) phase map at D = 7.5 μm.*

**3.2 Controlled crystallographic structure by piercing**
