**4. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical Specimens**

Reveals SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 205 patients at multiple sites with lower respiratory tract samples, importantly the RNA virus has been detected in feces which imply SARS-CoV-2 may be transmitted by the fecal route. A small percentage of blood samples had positive PCR test results, suggesting that infection sometimes may be systemic. Transmission of the virus by respiratory and extra respiratory routes may help explain the rapid spread of disease. In addition, testing of specimens from multiple sites may improve the sensitivity and reduce false-negative test results. Two smaller studies reported the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in anal or oral swabs and blood from 16 patients in Hubei Province, 3 and viral load in throat swabs and sputum from17 confirmed cases.

Retrospectively identified a convenience sample of patients admitted to Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, with a diagnosis of COVID-19 and paired RT-qPCR testing of pharyngeal swabs with either sputum or feces samples. A diagnosis of COVID-19 required at least 2 RT-qPCR–positive pharyngeal swabs, and patients underwent treatments as well as initial and follow-up testing of pharyngeal, sputum, or fecal samples at the discretion of treating clinicians. Hospital discharge required meeting four criteria: afebrile for more than 3 days, resolution of respiratory symptoms, substantial improvement of chest computed tomographic findings, and two consecutive negative RTqPCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory samples obtained at least 24 hours apart [13]. We report the findings of patients with at least one initial or follow-up RT-qPCR positive sputum or fecal sample obtained within 24 hours of a follow-up negative. RT-qPCR pharyngeal sample. The RT-qPCR assay targeted the open reading frame 1ab (ORF1ab) region and nucleoprotein (N) gene with a negative control. A cycle threshold value of 37 or less was interpreted as positive for SARS-CoV-2, according to Chinese national guidelines. Among 133 patients admitted with COVID-19 from 20 January to 27 February 2020, we identified 22 with an initial or follow-up positive sputum or fecal samples paired with a follow-up negative pharyngeal sample. Of these patients, 18 were aged 15–65 years, and 4 were children; 14 were male; and 11 had a history of either travel to or exposure to an individual returning from Hubei Province in the past month. Fever was the most common initial onset symptom.

*Some RNA Viruses*

Africa [2].

global alert in 1918, 1957, 1968, 2003, and 2019 causing severe acute respiratory diseases [2]. The Novel SARS-CoV-2 outbreak resulted in globally, as of 2:33 pm CEST, 17 May 2020, there have been 4,525,497 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 307,395 deaths, reported to WHO with substantial economic impact. Since then several other viral respiratory pathogens have emerged including Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), adenovirus-14, and virulent strains of influenza viruses. Soon after the discovery of SARS, new coronaviruses NL63 and HKU1 were identified [2, 3]. The emergence of 35 different respiratory viruses underscores the epidemic potential and overall threat to global health security. Severity caused by Novel SARS-CoV-2 has been recognized as a global public health security threat [3]. Many African countries are not prepared for the Novel SARS-CoV-2 outbreak due to poor and weak healthcare system, poor surveillance and response system, as well as inadequate and overstretched health facilities and services established higher risk of Novel SARS-CoV-2 importation from Europe to Africa than china importation, comparing rapid spread of the virus in selected sub-Sahara countries than in European countries. Some African countries have developed capacity to respond to the outbreak as at 11 May, 2020, a total of 13,814 confirmed cases and 747 deaths from Novel SARS-CoV-2 have been documented in

Genome sequence associated with Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and human severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) has been systematically analyzed to be linked to beta bat coronavirus [4], WHO officially named the virus "SARS-CoV-2" although its origin is still been investigated which suggests human to human transmission could be through wild animals been sold illegally at a wholesale seafood market in Wuhan [5]. In this review, we summarized the latest research progress on the transmission mode dynamics and viral shedding in provide direction for Isolation protocol. The transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 is represented by the reproduction number (R0) which is the average number of new infections

A 29.9 kb weight of genome structure which are key virulence factors where profile from SARS CoV-2 patients in Wuhan market in China [7]. While SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV have positive-sense RNA genomes of 27.9 and 30.1 kb, respectively [8]. MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV 2 are made up of 27.9 and 30.1 kb RNA genomes positive-sense with 6–11 variable opening frame (ORFs) [9]. The first ORF (ORF1a/b) location translate pp1a and pp1ab polyprotein which is made up of twothird RNA viral genome encoded in the 16 non-structural proteins (NSP) while other encasement are of structural and accessory protein ORFs. Other essential viral structural proteins include; nucleocapsid (N) protein, matrix (M) protein, small envelope (E) protein and spike (S) glycoprotein [10], It was established by Wu et al. that several accessory proteins interfere with innate immune response of

**3. Epidemiology—origin, Reservoirs and transmission dynamics of** 

The SARS-CoV-2 is positive-sense RNA virus from the family of β-coronavirus with a non-segmented envelope belonging to the subfamily of Orthocoronavirinae

generated by an infectious person in a totally naïve population [6].

**2. SARS CoV-2 viral genome and key virulence factors**

**2**

the host [7].

**SARS-CoV-2**
