**Author details**

Nixon Alexander Correa-Muñoz<sup>1</sup> \*† and Carol Andrea Murillo-Feo2†

1 Universidad del Cauca, Popayán, Colombia

2 Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia

\*Address all correspondence to: nico@unicauca.edu.co

† These authors contributed equally.

© 2020 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**References**

139-150

**40**(9):1095-1113

2013;**1**(2):1749-1774

[1] Martha TR., Cees J. van Westen, Norman Kerle, Victor Jetten, and K. Vinod Kumar. Landslide hazard and

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94251*

*SAR-A comprehensive review and outlook*

*to Sentinel-1,* Volume 6. 2014.

167-174

*The Potential of Remote Sensing to Assess Conditioning Factors for Landslide Detection…*

**39**(1):8-20

17–10, 2003.

*Sensing,* 9(3):194, 2017.

[9] Navarro J, Cuevas M, Tomás R, Barra A, Crosetto M. A toolset to detect and classify active deformation areas using interferometric SAR data. In: *Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management (GISTAM 2019)*. 2019:

[10] Ferretti A, Prati C, Rocca F. Permanent scatterers in SAR

interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2001;

[11] Kristina R. Czuchlewski, Jeffrey K. Weissel, and Yunjin Kim. Polarimetric synthetic aperture radar study of the Tsaoling landslide generated by the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan. *Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface,* 108(F1):7–

[12] Roberto Tomás and Zhenhong Li. Earth Observations for Geohazards: Present and Future Challenges. *Remote*

[13] Jacobsen K. DEMANAL program system BLUH. Technical report, Institute of Photogrammetry and GeoInformation. Hannover. 2019

[14] Kemp LD, Bonham-Carter GF, Raines GL, Looney CG. *Arc-SDM: Arcview Extension for Spatial Data Modelling Using Weights of Evidence, Logistic Regression, Fuzzy Logic and Neural Network Analysis*. Instituto de Geociências: Universidade Estadual de

[15] Development Core RR, Team R, Language A. Environment for statistical.

Campinas, São Paulo; 2001

Computing. 2011

inventories. Geomorphology. 2013;**184**:

[2] Lee S, Min K. Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin. Korea. *Environmental Geology*. 2001;

risk assessment using semiautomatically created landslide

[3] Mărgărint MC, Grozavu A, Patriche CV. Assessing the spatial variability of weights of landslide causal factors in different regions from Romania using logistic regression. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions.

[4] Martinis S, Clandillon S, Plank S, Twele A, Huber C, Caspard M, et al. Sadri Haouer, and Eva-Maria Fuchs. Advancing SAR and Optical Methods for Rapid Mapping. Technical Report:

ASAPTERRA; January, 2017

335. Elsevier B.V. 2011

2017;**130**:370-384

**137**

[5] Seijmonsbergen AC, Hengl T, Anders NS. Semi-automated identification and extraction of

geomorphological features using digital elevation data. In: *Developments in Earth Surface Processes*, Volume 15, Pages 297–

[6] Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T. Assessing uncertainties associated with digital elevation models for object based landslide Delination. In: GEOBIA 2016:

Solutions and Synergies, 2016.

[8] Simon Plank. *Rapid damage assessment by means of multi-temporal*

[7] Zhu Z. Change detection using landsat time series: A review of

frequencies, preprocessing, algorithms, and applications. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

*The Potential of Remote Sensing to Assess Conditioning Factors for Landslide Detection… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94251*
