1. Introduction

In mathematics, every postulation needs a proof it exists—a solution before searching for the solution. Yet in science, it seems to me it does not have a criterion as mathematics does, to prove first a hypothesis exists within our temporal (t > 0) universe. Without such a criterion, fictitious science emerges, as already have been happening in every day's event. And this is one the objectives for writing this article, in which I will show what is wrong with theoretical physicists, although they were the creators of science. Yet, all laws of physics were made to be broken and to be revised, which includes the paradoxes and principles; this is all about science. Since all the physical laws, principles, and paradigms have been working well in the past, it is by no means that they are still assumed applicable, as space is getting larger and particles are becoming smaller. As more and more sophisticated physics are discovered, the need for updating the laws and paradigms is inevitable. Otherwise virtual and fictitious solution emerges, since theoretical physics is an applied mathematics.

**122**

*Advances in Quantum Communication and Information*

[12] Feynman RP, Leighton RB, Sands M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Addison

Wesley; 1970

[1] Yu FTS. Time: The enigma of space. Asian Journal of Physics.

[2] Yu FTS. Entropy and Information Optics: Connecting Information and Time. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC

[3] Bohr N. On the constitution of atoms and molecules. Philosophical Magazine.

[5] Susskind L, Friedman A. Quantum Mechanics. New York: Basic Books;

[6] Feynman RP, Leigton RB, Sands M. Feynman Lectures on Physics. In: Quantum Mechanics. Vol. 3. Cambridge,

Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1966

[7] Bennett CH. Quantum information and computation. Physics Today.

[8] Pauli W. Über den Zusammenhang des Abschlusses der Elektronengruppen im Atom mit der Komplexstruktur der Spektren. Zeitschrift für Physik.

[9] Życzkowski K, Horodecki P, Horodecki M, Horodecki R. Dynamics of quantum entanglement. Physical

[10] Ladd TD, Jelezko F, Laflamme R, Nakamura C, Monroe C, O'Brien JL. Quantum Computers. Nature.

[11] Einstein A. Relativity, the Special and General Theory. New York: Crown

Review A. 2001;**65**:012101

2017;**26**(3):149-158

Press; 2017. pp. 171-176

[4] Schrödinger E. Probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

1913;**26**(1):1-23

1936;**32**(3):446-452

1995;**48**(10):24-30

1925;**31**:765

2010;**464**:45-53

Publishers; 1961

2014. p. 119

Theoretical physicists were the creators of modern science and still are; it is their responsibility in part to correct what they have done to the physics recently. However, they seem to know precisely that some of their analytical solutions were irrational and spooky as have been noted by Einstein, a century ago. Yet they have not tried hard enough to find out the cause, continuingly producing those dysfunctional solutions and pretending there are real and existing within our universe, for which we have seen scores of fictitious sciences emerged as orchestrated by their ambition; that has become the mainstream of scientific research topics, for example, quantum supremacy in computing, granular time variable, curving time–space, repeated cyclic universal, and so on, in which none of them, as will be shown in subsequent discussion, actually existed with our temporal (t > 0) universe.

Since theoretical physicists need mathematics, but mathematics is not physics, unless her analytical solution is complied within the boundary condition of our universe, causality (t > 0) and dimensionality, then her analytical solution is a physical realizable solution that can be applied directly within our universe.

As we know, physics is physically real and mathematics is abstractly virtual. However, it is not how fancy mathematics is compared to physics that guarantees her analytical solution is physically real. It is her physical realizable paradigm that determines her solution is physical realizable. In other words, if one uses an empty subspace model to evaluate a physical problem, then very likely her analytical solution will be timeless (t = 0). For example, using Schrödinger wave equation to analyze the quantum dynamic behavior of a particle, then the particle dynamic solution will be timeless (t = 0) with respect to the empty space of the model, since

For instances; in view of all the sophisticated mathematics such as; Hilbert space, Banach space, Riemann surface, topological spaces, group theory and others have been used by theoretical physicists, but without any physical evidence to support the solutions are physical real. Besides all those fancy mathematics were not originated by theoretical physicists but by a group of abstract mathematicians, in which we see that theoretical physics is actually an "applied" mathematics or simply mathematics. Since theoretical physics is mathematics, the burden on their shoulders is to provide us with physically real solutions for practical implementation. Yet they have been persistently giving us the virtual fictitious solutions, even though they knew some of their results are irrational and spooky as noted by Einstein a

It seems to me it is kind of out of control; we have seen fictitious sciences added with very convincing computer animations becoming the mainstream of current topics of science. Therefore it is an urgent responsibility for the theoretical physicists to bring back the theoretical physics to reality, since the origin of physics was

Before illustrating the consequences as will be used for analytical solution, such as from virtual mathematical empty space paradigm, I would introduce several subspaces that have been used by the theoretical physicists in the past and present,

In this figure we see an absolute-empty space, a mathematical virtual space, a Newtonian's space, and a temporal (t > 0) space. An absolute-empty space or just empty space has no substance and has no time. A mathematical virtual space is an empty space which has no substance in it, but a mathematician can assume coordinates in it, since mathematics is a virtual space. Although this virtual mathematical space has been extensively used by scientists, theoretical physicists, and others since the birth of science, it is an abstract space that does not exist within our temporal (i.e., t > 0) space. The next subspace is known as Newtonian space [8]; it has substance and coordinates in it but treated time as an "independent" variable. But Newtonian space does not actually exist within our temporal (t > 0) space, since time and substance are mutually coexisting within our temporal (t > 0) universe. The last subspace is known as temporal (t > 0) space [5, 6], where time and

substance are interdependent or coexisting, in which we note that time is a forward

3. Burden of theoretical analysis

What Is "Wrong" with Current Theoretical Physicists? DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90058

empty space is a timeless space.

started by theoretical physicists.

century ago!

3.1 Subspaces

125

as depicted in Figure 1.
