**Chapter 2**

*Linked Open Data - Applications, Trends and Future Developments*

[18] IFLA. Study group on the functional

[19] Baker T, Coyle K, Petiya S. Multientity models of resource description in the semantic web: A comparison of FRBR, RDA, and BIBFRAME. Library

[20] Meehan TP. BIBFRAME. Catalogue

BIBFRAME 2.0 from the viewpoint of RDA metadata schema. Cataloging

requirements for bibliographic records. In: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Munich:

K.G. Saur Verlag; 1998

Hi Tech. 2014;**32**(4):562-582

and Index. 2014;**174**:43-52

[21] Taniguchi S. Examining

and Classification Quarterly.

[22] Yang S, Lee YY. Organizing bibliographic data with RDA: How far have we stridden towards the semantic web? In: Park JR, Howards L, editors. New Directions in Information Organization. Bingley, UK: Emerald

[23] Yoose B, Perkins J. The linked open data landscape in libraries and beyond. Journal of Library Metadata.

[24] Berners-Lee T. Linked data

html [Accessed: 02 June 2020]

[Internet]. 2006. Available from: http:// www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.

[25] Taniguchi S. Is BIBFRAME 2.0 a suitable schema for exchanging and sharing diverse descriptive metadata about bibliographic resources?

Cataloging and Classification Quarterly.

[26] Park J-R, Richards L, Brenza A. Benefits and challenges of BIBFRAME: Cataloging special format materials, implementation, and continuing educational resources. Library Hi Tech.

2017;**55**(6):387-412

Insight; 2013. pp. 3-27

2013;**13**(2/3):197-211

2018;**56**(1):40-61

2019;**37**(3):549-565

**18**
