**Author details**

Igor Goncharov<sup>1</sup> \*, Nikita Goncharov<sup>1</sup> , Pavel Parinov<sup>1</sup> , Sergey Kochedykov<sup>2</sup> and Alexander Dushkin<sup>3</sup>


\*Address all correspondence to: goncharov@infobez.org

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

other subjects. Figures "b" demonstrate the functioning of the automaton, when

the character of the IPI diffusion within the social network is practically

when the subjects are neutral to the IPI (**Figures 3a** and **7a**), just a small number

when the subjects are negative or positive to the IPI (**Figures 4a**, **5a**, **8a**, and **9a**),

*TI* <sup>∈</sup> ½ � �1; <sup>1</sup> , that is, the subject has the opposite opinion to the one imposed

*TRkj*

**304**

**Figure 9.**

**Figure 7.**

**Figure 8.**

by the IPI.

**4.3 Discussion**

exponential;

Analysis of **Figures 3**–**9** shows that

of initiators can successfully perform the IPI;

*Distribution of cells according to the discrete time whenever Vk* ∈½ � 0*;* 5; 1 *.*

*Distribution of cells according to the discrete time whenever Vk* ∈½ � �0*;* 5; 0*;* 5 *.*

*Probability, Combinatorics and Control*

*Distribution of cells according to the discrete time whenever Vk* ∈½ � �1; �0*;* 5 *.*

the IPI does not influence their state;
