*Reproduction in Small Ruminants (Goats) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93481*

*Animal Reproduction in Veterinary Medicine*

goats in Nigeria. Asian Pacific Journal of

[22] Araya J, Bedos M, Duarte G,

2017;**57**:2066-2071

2020;**143**:82-87

[23] Espinoza-Flores LA,

[24] Zarazaga LA, Gatica MC,

Animal. 2019;**13**:1658-1166

Aranguren-Méndez J, Yanez F, Quintero-Moreno A. Sexual behavior

and genetic control of seasonal reproduction in sheep and goats. Reproduction in Domestic Animals.

[27] Zarazaga LA, Gatica MC, Hernández H, Gallego-Calvo L,

of "Criollo Limonero" bulls. Revista Facultad de Agronomáía.

2011;**28**:505-513

2010;**45**:42-49

2007. pp. 319-328

Hernández H, Keller M, Chemineau P, Delgadillo JA, et al. The reproductive response to the male effect of 7-or 10-month-old female goats is improved when photostimulated males are used.

[25] Madrid-Bury E, González-Stagnaro C,

[26] Chemineau P, Bodin L, Migaud M, Thiéry JC, Malpaux B. Neuroendocrine

Delgadillo JA, Guzmán JL. The isolation of females from males to promote a later male effect is unnecessary if the bucks used are sexually active. Theriogenology. 2017;**95**:42-47

[28] Carrillo E, Véliz FG, Flores JA, Delgadillo JA. El decremento en la proporción macho-hembras no disminuye la capacidad para inducir la actividad estral de cabras anovulatorias. Vol. 45. Técnica Pecuaria en México;

Andrade-Esparza JD, Hernández H, Zarazaga LA, Abecia JA, Chemineau P, et al. Male effect using photostimulated bucks and nutritional supplementation advance puberty in goats under semiextensive management. Theriogenology.

Hernández H, Keller M, Chemineau P, et al. Maintaining bucks over 35 days after a male effect improves pregnancy rate in goats. Animal Production Science.

Martínez-Rojero R, Torres-Hernández R, Mastache-Lagunas A, Gallegos-Sánchez J.

Reproduction. 2016;**5**:96-101

[17] Merlos-Brito M,

2008;**33**:323-333

Animals. 2019;**9**:1-11

2018;**46**:714-719

2016;**184**:35-40

2016;**10**:649-654

[19] Montes-Quiroz GL, Sánchez-Dávila F, Grizelj J,

Evaluación de características productivas en cabritos Boer x local, Nubia x local y locales en trópico seco de Guerrero, México. Veterinaria México.

[18] Meza-Herrera CA, Romero-

Rodríguez CA, Nevárez-Dominguez A, Flores-Hernández A, Cano-Villegas O, Macías-Cruz U, et al. The Opuntia effect and the reactivation of ovarian function and blood metabolite concentrations of anestrous goats exposed to active males.

Bernal-Barragán H, Vazquez-Armijo JF, Bosque-González ASD, et al. The reinsertion of controlled internal drug release devices in goats does not increase the pregnancy rate after short oestrus synchronization protocol at the beginning of the breeding season. Journal of Applied Animal Research.

[20] Bedos M, Muñoz AL, Orihuela A, Delgadillo JA. The sexual behavior of male goats exposed to long days is as intense as during their breeding season. Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

[21] Delgadillo JA, Vélez LI, Flores JA. Continuous light after a long-day treatment is equivalent to melatonin implants to stimulate testosterone secretion in Alpine male goats. Animal.

[16] Simões J. Recent advances on synchronization of ovulation in goats, out of season, for a more sustainablen production. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction. 2015;**4**:157-165

**84**

[29] Véliz-Deras FG, Monroy LV, Cabrera JF, Moreno GD, Massot PP, Malpaux B, et al. La presencia del macho en un grupo de cabras anestricas no impide su respuesta estral a la introducción de un nuevo macho. Veterinaria Mexico. 2004;**35**:169-178

[30] Vielma J, Terrazas A, Véliz FG, Flores JA, Hernandez H, Duarte G, et al. Las vocalizaciones de machos cabríos no estimulan la secreción de la LH ni la ovulación en las cabras anovulatorias. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2008;**46**:25-36

[31] Santiago-Miramontes D, de los Ángeles M, Marcelino-León S, Luna-Orozco JR, Rivas-Muñoz R, Rodríguez-Martínez R, et al. La presencia de hembras estrogenizadas al momento del efecto macho induce la actividad estral de cabras en el semidesierto mexicano. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente. 2011;**17**:77-85

[32] Delgadillo JA, Gelez H, Ungerfeld R, Hawken PA, Martin GB. The 'male effect' in sheep and goats—Revisiting the dogmas. Behavioural Brain Research. 2009;**200**:304-314

[33] Orihuela A. Ram's sexual behavior. Review. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2014;**5**:49-89

[34] Giriboni J, Lacuesta L, Damián JP, Ungerfeld R. Grouping previously unknown bucks is a stressor with negative effects on reproduction. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2015;**47**:317-322

[35] Lacuesta L, Ungerfeld R. Sexual performance and stress response of previously unknown rams after grouping them in dyads. Animal Reproduction Science. 2012;**134**:158-163

[36] Sánchez-Dávila F, Barragán HB, del Bosque-González AS, Ungerfeld R. Social dominance affects the

development of sexual behaviour but not semen output in yearling bucks. Theriogenology. 2018;**110**:168-174

[37] Kikusui T, Winslow JT, Mori Y. Social buffering: Relief from stress and anxiety. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2006;**361**:2215-2228

[38] Vas J, Chojnacki R, Kjoren M, Lingwa C, Andersen I. Social interactions, cortisol and reproductive success of domestic goats (*Capra hircus*) subjected to different animal densities during pregnancy. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2013;**147**:117-126

[39] Iyasere O, James I, Williams T, Daramola J, Lawal K, Oke O, et al. Behavioural and physiological responses of West African Dwarf Goat dams and kids subjected to short-term separation. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosytem. 2018;**51**:5-11

[40] Solano J, Galindo F, Orihuela A, Galina CS. The effect of social rank on the physiological response during repeated stressful handling in Zebu cattle (*Bos indicus*). Physiology of Behaviour. 2004;**82**:679-683

[41] Mainguy J, Côté SD, Cardinal E, Houle M. Mating tactics and mate choice in relation to age and social rank in male mountain goats. Journal of Mammalogy. 2008;**89**:626-635

[42] Chenoweth PJ. Sexual behavior of the bull: A review. Journal of Dairy Science. 1983;**66**:173-179

[43] Hernández Z. La caprinocultura en el marco de la ganadería poblana (México): Contribución de la especie caprina y sistemas de producción. Archivos de Zootecnia. 2000;**49**:341-352

[44] Miranda-de la Lama G, Mattielo S. The importance of social behaviour for goat welfare in livestock farming. Small Ruminant Research. 2010;**90**:1-10

[45] Clutton-Brock TH, Huchard E. Social competition and selection in males and females. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2013;**368**:1-15

[46] Clutton-Brock T. Reproductive competition and sexual selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2017;**372**:1-10

[47] Ungerfeld R. Managing reproductive seasonality in small ruminants. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal. 2016;**24**:111-116

[48] Mainguy K, Côté SD. Age and state-dependent reproductive effortin male mountain goats (*Oreamnos americanus*). Behavior Ecology Society. 2007;**62**:935-943

[49] Katz LS. Variation in male sexual behavior. Animal Reproduction Science. 2008;**105**:64-71

[50] Pelletier F, Festa-Bianchet M. Sexual selection and social rank in bighorn rams. Animal Behavior. 2006;**71**:649-655

[51] Giriboni J, Lacuesta L, Ungerfeld R. Continuous contact with females in estrus throughout the year enhances testicular activity and improves seminal traits of male goats. Theriogenology. 2017;**87**:284-289

[52] Imwalle DB, Katz LS. Development of sexual behavior over several serving capacity tests in male goats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2004;**89**:315-319

[53] Vejarano OA, Sanabria R, Trujillo G. Diagnostic of bulls reproduction capability from three livestock farms of the upper Magdalena. Revista MVZ Córdoba. 2005;**10**:648-662

[54] Saunders FC, McElligott AG, Safi K, Hayden TJ. Mating tactics of male feral goats (*Capra hircus*): Risks and benefits. Acta Ethologica. 2005;**8**:103-110

**87**

Section 3

Sexual Cycle, Estrus

Synchronization and

Ovulation
