**Chapter 2**

*Metacognition in Learning*

linguistics. 1959;**1**:34-41

2006;**2006**(1):1-71

2011;**61**(4):1222-1255

1990;**7**(1):31-51

1992;**76**(1):27-33

1998;**49**(1):65-85

2008;**5**:193-218

and second language acquisition.

[36] Wolff H. Intelligibility and interethnic attitudes. Anthropological

program. English for Specific Purposes.

efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist.

[47] Chen HY. Relationship between EFL Learners' Self-Efficacy Beliefs and English Performance[dissertation]. Tallahassee, Florida: Florida State

[48] Mills N, Pajares F, Herron C. A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Self-efficacy, anxiety, and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals.

[49] Graham S. Self-efficacy and academic listening. Journal of English for Academic Purposes.

[50] Graham S. Learner strategies and self-efficacy: Making the connection. The Language Learning Journal.

[51] Schunk DH, Rice JM. Strategy verbalization effects on Self-efficacy and listening comprehension. The Journal of Experimental Education.

[46] Bandura A. Perceived self-

2014;**35**:54-65

1993;**28**(2):117-148

University; 2007

2006;**39**(2):276-295

2011;**10**(2):113-117

2007;**35**(1):81-93

1983;**5**:49-54

[37] Xi X, Mollaun P. Investigating the utility of analytic scoring for the TOEFL Academic Speaking Test (TAST). ETS Research Report Series.

[38] Xi X, Mollaun P. Using raters from India to score a large-scale speaking test. Language Learning.

[40] Cumming A. Expertise in evaluating second language compositions. Language Testing.

[41] Shohamy E, Gordon CM, Kraemer R. The effect of raters' background and training on the reliability of direct writing tests. The Modern Language Journal.

MA: Addison-Wesley; 1954

[42] Allport GW, Clark K, Pettigrew T. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge,

[43] Pettigrew TF. Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology.

[44] Kang O, Rubin D, Lindemann S. Mitigating US undergraduates' attitudes toward international teaching assistants. Tesol Quarterly. 2015;**49**(4):681-706

[45] Staples S, Kang O, Wittner E. Considering interlocutors in university discourse communities: Impacting US undergraduates' perceptions of ITAs through a structured contact

[39] Winke P, Gass S, Myford C. Raters' L2 background as a potential source of bias in rating oral performance. Language Testing. 2013;**30**(2):231-252

**16**
