**2. Storage of compressed CO2**

Carbon dioxide storage underground in Turkey has required to determine the suitable geo storage capacity of the rock structures to be chosen [2]. The goal was to examine the details of the storage of carbon dioxide by injecting it underground in a selected area with geological and numerical models and to make an economic analysis.

The work in this study was carried out in steps:


while exponential distribution k = 0, where u is the cost function, σ is the variance, k is hybrid distribution parameter, Ө is the time parameter, x is the flow

*Microwave Caustic Slurry Carbonation of Flue Gas of Coal Power Plants in Double…*

The oxygen content and electroopotantial of waters adequately accounted in stream flows causing animal feed contamination in the pastoral fields by soil and growing grass nearby this contaminated stream see page [5, 6]. The **Figures 2** and **3**

In the hot streams and acidic mine waters the ferric iron and sulfate tend to be highly common as AMD seepage, alkali resulting from the reduction of these two

showed the carbonate stability region in the sequestration phase layer and

rate by the following **Figure 1** [5].

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94976*

**Figure 1.**

**Figure 2.**

**29**

electropotential quality of the sludge.

**3. Carbonation of flue gas at microwave column**

*Storage phase layer diagrams for oil and geothermal field - carbonate stability.*

*Change of the cost of drilling for compressed air/CO2 storage reservoir.*


#### **2.1 Investment modeling of compressed CO2 storage from coal and biomass combustion**

When the CO2 emission inventory is examined, it is seen that thermal power plants, cement factories, iron and steel industry and refineries are the main sources of CO2 emission in high amounts and in centralized areas. Emissions from transport and domestic use are scattered sources and it is thought that they can be reduced by efficiency measures.

The emission statisticsy in Turkey showed that the high increase in annual emissions [3]. Although it is aimed to increase energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy sources, it is predicted that dependence on fossil fuels will continue in all countries. In this case, another measure that should be taken would be to support technologies that will reduce CO2 emissions from coal-fired thermal power plants. Since CO2 is released as a product in all combustion processes, it is still not possible to eliminate CO2 completely. Therefore, measures should be taken to reduce CO2 emissions. The reduction of CO2 emissions will be possible by underground storage of CO2 in geological structures. Considering that CO2 emissions from industrial zones around the world are determined as 13.5 Gt/year [4], geological areas other than known oil and gas reservoirs should also be evaluated.

The cost of capturing and deposition as below Eq. 1:

$$\mathbf{u}(\mathbf{x}, \sigma, \mathbf{c}) = (\mathbf{1}/\sigma) \left(\mathbf{1} + \mathbf{k}/\sigma \left(\mathbf{x} - \Theta\right)\right)^{-1 - 1/\mathbf{k}} \tag{1}$$

*Microwave Caustic Slurry Carbonation of Flue Gas of Coal Power Plants in Double… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94976*

**Figure 1.** *Change of the cost of drilling for compressed air/CO2 storage reservoir.*

while exponential distribution k = 0, where u is the cost function, σ is the variance, k is hybrid distribution parameter, Ө is the time parameter, x is the flow rate by the following **Figure 1** [5].
