**Acknowledgements**

*Recent Advances in Flood Risk Management*

other buildings such as schools, hospitals, roads, businesses and other aspects that

*Risk with current infrastructure (a), for 50 years of growth without rectification (b), for 50 years of growth* 

*Risk computation for each Tr and Arlene events considering 2015 conditions and at 50 years of growth with and* 

In particular, for a 50 years of growth projection where the percentage of increment is 8.51 times the houses in 2015, both measures (structural and nonstructural) were assessed to have the risk map. This agrees with [7], in the high convenience to use a nonstructural measure, even more than a structural one. However, as it was observed here, the combination of both measures improves results reducing considerably the probability of flood. Also, [7] indicated one can find that a better understanding of the system is crucial, since as a susceptible area to floods, it cannot be ignored and expected that there is no flood risk. On the contrary, it will continue but at a different degree.

Floods are very dynamic affecting the river and its floodplain particularly during its displacement downstream. This makes FluBiDi a good option to simulate flood events using a real topography under different conditions such as gauged and ungauged basins. The model calibration is a crucial activity, for planning and public safety. The method used for FluBiDi calibration was ideal since there were data

**102**

**6. Conclusions**

affect economically the area.

*with rectification (c) and with nonstructural measure (d).*

**Figure 12.**

**Figure 11.**

*without rectification.*

The authors thank the National Water Commission (CONAGUA), in particular, the Technical General Sub-directorate for the available information on basins instrumented.
