**Author details**

Jason Gordon1 \*, Adam S. Willcox2 , A.E. Luloff<sup>3</sup> , James C. Finley3 and Donald G. Hodges2

1 Mississippi State University, Starkville, United States of America

2 University of Tennessee, Knoxville, United States of America

3 The Pennsylvania State University, United States of America

\*Address all correspondence to: jg966@msstate.edu

© 2018 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**83**

2011;**20**:612-624

*Public Perceptions of Values Associated with Wildfire Protection at the Wildland-Urban…*

[9] United States Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Department of the Interior. National Fire Plan: A Report to the President in Response to the Wildfires of 2000. Washington, DC:

[10] United States Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Department of the Interior. (2009) Quadrennial Fire Review 2009: Final Report. www.iafc. org/files/wild\_QFR2009Report.pdf [Accessed: December 4, 2013]

[11] Bright AD, Newman P. How forest context influences the acceptability of prescribed burning and mechanical thinning. In: McCaffrey SM, editor. The Public and Wildland Fire Management: Social Science Findings for Managers. USDA Forest Service, Northern

Research Station Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-1. Newtown Square, PA; 2006. pp. 47-52

[13] McCaffrey S, Kumagai Y. No need to reinvent the wheel: Applying existing social science theories to wildfire. In: Daniel TC, Carroll MS, Moseley C, Raish C, editors. People, Fire, and Forests: A Synthesis of Wildfire Social Science. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press; 2007. pp. 12-36

[14] Monroe MC, Long AJ,

2003;**101**:14-19

Marynowski S. Wildland fire in the southeast: Negotiating guidelines for defensible space. Journal of Forestry.

[15] Ryan RL, Wamsley MB. Public perceptions of wildfire risk and forest management in the central pine barrens of Long Island (USA). The Australasian

[12] Brunson MW, Shindler BA. Geographic variation in social acceptability of wildland fuels management in the western United States. Society & Natural Resources.

2004;**17**:661-678

USDA & USDI; 2001

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82171*

[2] Stein SM, Menakis J, Carr MA, Comas

Interface—A Forests on the Edge Report. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-

et al. Wildfire, Wildlands, and People: Understanding and Preparing for Wildfire in the Wildland-Urban

[1] Finney MA. The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire. Forest Ecology and Management.

SJ, Stewart SI, Cleveland H,

GTR-299. Fort Collins, CO; 2013

[3] Toman E, Stidham M, McCaffrey S, Shindler B. Social Science at the Wildland-Urban Interface: A Compendium of Research Results to Create Fire-Adapted Communities. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-111. Newtown Square, PA; 2013

[4] Brenkert-Smith H. The place of fire. Natural Hazards Review. 2006;**7**:105-113

[5] Collins T, Bolin B. Situating hazard vulnerability: people's negotiations with wildfire environments in the US Southwest. Environmental Management. 2009;**44**:441-455

[6] Gunderson K. Understanding place meanings for wilderness: Personal and community values at risk. International Journal of Wilderness. 2006;**12**:27-31

[7] Nelson KC, Monroe MC, Johnson JF, Bowers A. Living with fire: Homeowner assessment of landscape values and defensible space in Minnesota and Florida, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 2004;**13**:413-425

[8] Eriksen C, Prior T. The art of learning: Wildfire, amenity migration and local environmental knowledge. International Journal of Wildland Fire.

2005;**21**:97-108

**References**

*Public Perceptions of Values Associated with Wildfire Protection at the Wildland-Urban… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82171*
