**Author details**

Rayhan SK\* and Somdutta Barua Centre for the Study of Regional Development, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India

\*Address all correspondence to: rayhangog@gmail.com

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**69**

*Correlates of Caesarean Section Delivery in West Bengal, India: An Analysis Based on DLHS-3*

[10] WHO. WHO Statement on

Available from: www.Who.Int/

[11] International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007-08. Mumbai, India:

[12] International Institute for Population Science (IIPS) and Macro International. District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-2), 2002-04.

Mumbai, India: IIPS; 2007

[13] International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-4), 2012-13, Factsheets. Mumbai, India: IIPS; 2014

[14] Leone T, Padmadas SS, Matthews Z. Community factors affecting rising caesarean section rates in developing countries: An analysis of six countries. Social Science and Medicine. 2008;**67**:

[15] Chacham AS, Perpetuo IHO. The incidence of caesarean deliveries in Belo Horizonte, Brazil: Social and economic determinants. Reproductive Health

[16] Henke RM, Wier LM, Marder WD, Friedman BS, Wong HS. Geographic variation in cesarean delivery in the United States by payer. BMC Pregnancy

[17] Hopkins K, Amaral E. The role of nonclinical factors in cesarean section rates in Brazil. In: Conference Population Association of America, Philadelphia, UAS; 2005. Available from: http:// paa2005.princeton.edu/papers/50741

[18] Stewart-Hall K. An analysis of risk factors associated with high rates

Matters. 1998;**6**:115-121

and Childbirth. 2014;**14**:387

Reproductivehealth/

IIPS; 2010

1236-1246

Caesarean Section Rates. 2014. pp. 1-8.

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88838*

[1] Belizan JM, Althabe F, Cafferatat ML. Health consequences of the increasing caesarean section rates. Epidemiology.

[2] Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-shun W, Thomas J, Look PV, et al. Rates of caesarean section: Analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology.

[3] Shah A, Fawole B, M'Imunya JM, Amokrane F, Nafiou I, Wolomby J, et al. Cesarean delivery outcomes 97 from the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Africa. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[4] Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, Donner A, Wojdyla D, Faundes A, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: Multicentre prospective study. British Medical Journal.

[5] Hemminki E. Long term maternal health effects of caesarean section. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1997;**45**:24-28

[6] Perez-Escamilla R, Maulen-Radovan I, Dewey KG. The association between cesarean delivery and breast-feeding outcomes among Mexican women. American Journal of Public Health.

[7] Lobel M, DeLuca RS. Psychosocial sequelae of caesarean delivery: Review and analysis of their causes and implications. Social Science and Medicine. 2007;**64**:2272-2284

[8] Shearer EL. Cesarean section: Medical benefits and costs. Social Science and Medicine. 1993;**37**(10):1223-1231

[9] WHO. Appropriate technology for

birth. Lancet. 1985;**2**:436-437

**References**

2007;**18**:485-486

2007;**21**:98-113

2009;**107**(3):191-197

2007;**335**:1025-1029

1996;**86**(6):832-836

*Correlates of Caesarean Section Delivery in West Bengal, India: An Analysis Based on DLHS-3 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88838*
