Table2.

Values obtained in the application of the thermodynamic consistency-test to VLE data of benzene + hexane at different conditions.

4. Results and discussion

procedure described in Section

.

shown in Figure 7

Figure 7.

57

Efficient fronts for s(g<sup>E</sup>

/RT) = f(s(h

results on each of the fronts, using the models: (

E

▴) M2; (

Figure 6. Plot of h

(

Ref. [44], (+) Ref. [45], (

Ref. [57], Ref. [58].

◁) Ref. [50], (

4.1 Modeling: efficient front and models

<sup>E</sup> values for the binary benzene + hexane. (a) h

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85743

◊) Ref. [46], (

The VLE data series previously verified has been modeled according to the

) Ref. [47], (

A Practical Fitting Method Involving a Trade-Off Decision in the Parametrization Procedure

<sup>E</sup> vs x, (b) h

□) Ref. [51], Ref. [52], Ref. [53], Ref. [54], Ref. [55], Ref. [56],

△) Ref. [48], (

2. The efficient fronts obtained for each system are

)), obtained for acetone + ethanol. Arrows and labels indicate the chosen

▾) M4.

) M3; and (

<sup>E</sup> (at x = 0.5) vs T. (

▽) Ref. [36], (

○) Ref. [43], (

▷) Ref. [49],

□ )

…

A Practical Fitting Method Involving a Trade-Off Decision in the Parametrization Procedure… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85743

Figure 6.

Plot of hE values for the binary benzene + hexane. (a) hE vs x, (b) hE (at x = 0.5) vs T. (○) Ref. [43], (□) Ref. [44], (+) Ref. [45], (◊) Ref. [46], () Ref. [47], (△) Ref. [48], (▽) Ref. [36], (▷) Ref. [49], (◁) Ref. [50], (□) Ref. [51], Ref. [52], Ref. [53], Ref. [54], Ref. [55], Ref. [56], Ref. [57], Ref. [58].
