Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases

Palaniappan Ramasamy

#### Abstract

Phage therapy is one of the most important control strategies envisaged for the management of bacterial diseases in the aquatic environment. There are no other effective alternative approaches for the natural control of bacterial diseases, while phage therapy remains the best method which has not yet been exploited. The occurrence, infectivity, lytic activities, therapeutic potentials, and efficacy of the bacteriophages of Bacillus spp./Vibrio spp. for control of pathogenic bacteria diseases such as Vibrio vulnificus, V. damsela, and V. furnissii in the cultures of crustaceans are presented. An ideal method for long-term storage and recovery of the lytic bacteriophages, agar bioassay method and one-step growth experiments, in vivo and in vitro experiments, and validation of the usefulness of phage therapy are described. The review highlights the occurrences of plagues of lytic phages of Vibrio sp. and Bacillus spp. and their control effects of vibriosis both in vivo and in vitro in the crustaceans, thus establishing the application and efficacy of the phages of Vibrio/Bacillus against the pathogenic Vibrio spp. Development of specific phage therapy or a cocktail of phages to a wide variety of systems is considered to represent an interesting emerging alternative to antibiotic therapy and vaccination.

Keywords: phage therapy, bacterial diseases, vibriosis, probiotics, bacteriophages, antimicrobials, antibiotic resistance, crustaceans, shrimp, lobster, crab, Artemia

#### 1. Introduction

#### 1.1 Global crustacean production and losses due to diseases

Global fish production was 171 million tons estimated at USD 362 billion in 2016, while aquaculture production was 80.37 million tons estimated at USD 232 billion [1–3] consisting of 54.1 million tons of finfish production, 17.1 million tons of molluscs, 7.9 million tons of crustaceans, and 938,500 tons of other aquatic animals such as turtles, sea cucumbers, sea urchins, frogs, and edible jellyfish [3]. Freshwater finfish represents half of the global aquaculture production (54%), molluscs being the second more produced aquaculture item in the world (24%) [2]. Crustaceans come next in production relevance, represented mostly by penaeid shrimps and grapsid crabs [2, 3]. Aquaculture is the world's fastest growing segment with a global increase of 5.7% per annum in shrimp production resulting in an increase of 18% by 2020, and the estimated world production of farmed shrimp is 3.5 million metric tons though the diseases, international market prices, and production costs

are the main challenges and constrains to the growth and productivity of the shrimp industry on a global level [4]. However, disease outbreaks have caused serious economic losses in several countries, and the estimated global losses due to shrimp diseases are around US\$ 6 billion per annum [5, 6]. Such concerns confirm that the bacterial diseases are the most important contracting factors for development of the global aquaculture industry [7].

causative organisms, and their crustacean hosts are listed in Table 1. Gaffkemia of lobsters is caused by Aerococcus viridans var. homari and is the root cause of mass mortalities of lobsters, while crabs, viz. Cancer borealis and C. irroratus, serve as reservoir hosts of Aerococcus viridans [8–13]. Vibriosis causes mass mortalities in several crustaceans such as penaeid shrimp Penaeus monodon and P. japonicus, fresh water prawn Macrobrachium, lobster Homarus americanus, blue crabs Callinectes sapidus, rock crabs Cancer irroratus, and shore crab Carcinus maenas. Shell diseases are caused by chitinolytic bacteria which were encountered in English prawn Palaemon serratus; American lobsters Homarus americanus; penaeid shrimp; king crabs, Paralithodes camtschaticus and Paralithodes platypus; and tanner crabs Chionoecetes tanneri, and these crustaceans are affected by rust diseases which are caused by chitin-destroying bacteria [8–22]. Significant mortalities of larval, postlarval, and adult crustaceans, viz. shrimp Penaeus monodon, Litopenaeus vannamei, and Macrobrachium, lobster Homarus americanus, and crab Portunus trituberculatus,

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

are caused by common pathogens such as Vibrio harveyi, V. alginolyticus, V.

2. Phage therapy

125

parahaemolyticus, V. anguillarum, V. furnissii, V. mimicus, V. damsela, Pseudomonas, and Aeromonas [9–22]. Infectious diseases caused by Vibrio species represent the greatest challenges that cause vibriosis with considerable economic losses, and that is the most overwhelming problem in aquaculture, shrimp, and crustaceans [7–101].

Phage therapy is a prospective ideal therapy for vibriosis in aquaculture of crustaceans. Bacteriophages are defined as bacterial viruses that can infect cells, multiply in, cytolyse, and destroy susceptible bacteria. Bacteriophages are viruses of bacteria which have a natural ability to target, infect, and destroy their host cells of a particular bacterial species or groups or even unrelated bacteria, and thus they play a major role in controlling their target bacterial population density in nature [23–60]. They are both omnipresent and copious in the aquaculture environment, especially in seawater, in which the total numbers of viruses normally surpass the bacterial cell concentration by a factor of 10 [25]. "Most phages reproduce upon entering a cell and in that process kill their host. They encode two families of proteins, holins, and lysins, which allow the phage progeny to burst through the bacterial cell wall and go off in search of new hosts. But the cell is already dead by the time that happens in terms of lethality; the lysis is just a matter of burning down the house for good measure." An estimated 10<sup>8</sup> strains of phage with approximately 1031–10<sup>32</sup> phages are known to occur in the biosphere at any given time [23]. Bacteriophages are used for the isolation and identification of specific bacteria to help in the diagnosis of the bacterial diseases, to kill antibiotic-resistant, virulent bacteria through a natural phenomenon called lysogeny, whereby one of the phageinfected bacteria in a colony kills another uninfected bacterium through phage

Due to their specific antibacterial activities and significance of the phage therapy as an alternative to antibiotics, bacteriophage therapy is re-emerging, and consequently this has become a potentially novel and useful concept to kill even intracellular pathogenic bacteria and warrant future development. Bacteriophage therapy has been extended from medical applications into the fields of agriculture, aquaculture, and the food industry [28–30, 39]. Bacteriophages specific for Vibrio spp. have been described [36–41]. Bacteriophages are known to infect >140 bacterial

missiles or antibacterial peptides [24, 25, 36–39, 41].

2.1 Phage therapy, an alternative to antibiotics

#### 1.2 Bacterial diseases in crustaceans

Bacteria in the aquatic environment and the bacterial diseases, viz. vibriosis, shell diseases (chitinolytic bacteria), and gaffkemia of lobsters, are ubiquitous and are significant for the survival of crustaceans in confined habitats [8–22]. Diseases,


#### Table 1.

Bacterial diseases, causative organisms, and their crustacean hosts.

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

causative organisms, and their crustacean hosts are listed in Table 1. Gaffkemia of lobsters is caused by Aerococcus viridans var. homari and is the root cause of mass mortalities of lobsters, while crabs, viz. Cancer borealis and C. irroratus, serve as reservoir hosts of Aerococcus viridans [8–13]. Vibriosis causes mass mortalities in several crustaceans such as penaeid shrimp Penaeus monodon and P. japonicus, fresh water prawn Macrobrachium, lobster Homarus americanus, blue crabs Callinectes sapidus, rock crabs Cancer irroratus, and shore crab Carcinus maenas. Shell diseases are caused by chitinolytic bacteria which were encountered in English prawn Palaemon serratus; American lobsters Homarus americanus; penaeid shrimp; king crabs, Paralithodes camtschaticus and Paralithodes platypus; and tanner crabs Chionoecetes tanneri, and these crustaceans are affected by rust diseases which are caused by chitin-destroying bacteria [8–22]. Significant mortalities of larval, postlarval, and adult crustaceans, viz. shrimp Penaeus monodon, Litopenaeus vannamei, and Macrobrachium, lobster Homarus americanus, and crab Portunus trituberculatus, are caused by common pathogens such as Vibrio harveyi, V. alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. anguillarum, V. furnissii, V. mimicus, V. damsela, Pseudomonas, and Aeromonas [9–22]. Infectious diseases caused by Vibrio species represent the greatest challenges that cause vibriosis with considerable economic losses, and that is the most overwhelming problem in aquaculture, shrimp, and crustaceans [7–101].

#### 2. Phage therapy

are the main challenges and constrains to the growth and productivity of the shrimp industry on a global level [4]. However, disease outbreaks have caused serious economic losses in several countries, and the estimated global losses due to shrimp diseases are around US\$ 6 billion per annum [5, 6]. Such concerns confirm that the bacterial diseases are the most important contracting factors for development of

Bacteria in the aquatic environment and the bacterial diseases, viz. vibriosis, shell diseases (chitinolytic bacteria), and gaffkemia of lobsters, are ubiquitous and are significant for the survival of crustaceans in confined habitats [8–22]. Diseases,

> Vibrio harveyi, V. splendidus; Vibrio harveyi, V. alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. anguillarum, V. furnissii, V. mimicus, V. damsela

Leucothrix sp.,Thiothrix sp., Flexibacter sp., Cytophaga sp., Flavobacterium sp. [7]

Chitonoclastic bacteria Vibrio spp. infections Vibrio, Aeromonas, Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium [7, 8, 11]

Chitinolytic or chitinoclastic bacteria (Gram-negative), viz. Vibrio spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Aeromonas spp.

like organism, Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio vulnificus, chitinoclastic bacteria, Rickettsia intracellular organisms, chlamydia-like organism, Spiroplasma, chitinoclastic bacteria, Rickettsia intracellular organisms, chlamydia-like organism, and

[7, 9–11, 13, 17, 20–22]

[7, 10–12]

Spiroplasma [7]

Lagenidium callinectes [16, 17]

Rickettsia-like bacterium, a-Proteobacteria, Streptococcus sp.,

[7, 13–22]

Diseases Hosts Causative bacterial species

Penaeus monodon, P. merguiensis,

Crabs and shrimp, white and brown shrimp Penaeus monodon, P. merguiensis, P. indicus

Cancer spp., Callinectes sapidus, other crabs; lobsters, shrimps,

Spiny lobster Panulirus spp., Panulirus ornatus, P. homarus, and P. stimpsoni; Litopenaeus vannamei (Penaeus monodon,

Gaffkemia, septicemia Lobsters Homarus americanus Gaffkya homari [7, 9–11]

(nauplii, zoea, and mysis) Indian tiger prawn] Macrobrachium rosenbergii

Bacteremias Bacterial diseases of crabs Vibrio, Aeromonas, Rhodobacteriales-

and P. indicus (eggs, larvae, postlarvae, juveniles, and adults); Litopenaeus vannamei, Macrobrachium, lobster Homarus americanus, crab Portunus trituberculatus

the global aquaculture industry [7].

1.2 Bacterial diseases in crustaceans

Bacterial fouling of surfaces with filamentous bacterial

Shell disease, brown/black spot, black gill, black rot/ erosion, blisters, necrosis of

Chitinolytic bacterial disease, shell disease, box burnt disease, bacterial shell

Milky hemolymph disease (milky hemolymph syndrome [MHS])

disease

Crustacea

appendages

disease

Table 1.

124

Vibriosis Penaeus monodon, P. merguiensis,

P. indicus

and crayfish

Carcinus maenas)

Fungal diseases Penaeus monodon, [larval

Bacterial diseases, causative organisms, and their crustacean hosts.

Phage therapy is a prospective ideal therapy for vibriosis in aquaculture of crustaceans. Bacteriophages are defined as bacterial viruses that can infect cells, multiply in, cytolyse, and destroy susceptible bacteria. Bacteriophages are viruses of bacteria which have a natural ability to target, infect, and destroy their host cells of a particular bacterial species or groups or even unrelated bacteria, and thus they play a major role in controlling their target bacterial population density in nature [23–60]. They are both omnipresent and copious in the aquaculture environment, especially in seawater, in which the total numbers of viruses normally surpass the bacterial cell concentration by a factor of 10 [25]. "Most phages reproduce upon entering a cell and in that process kill their host. They encode two families of proteins, holins, and lysins, which allow the phage progeny to burst through the bacterial cell wall and go off in search of new hosts. But the cell is already dead by the time that happens in terms of lethality; the lysis is just a matter of burning down the house for good measure." An estimated 10<sup>8</sup> strains of phage with approximately 1031–10<sup>32</sup> phages are known to occur in the biosphere at any given time [23]. Bacteriophages are used for the isolation and identification of specific bacteria to help in the diagnosis of the bacterial diseases, to kill antibiotic-resistant, virulent bacteria through a natural phenomenon called lysogeny, whereby one of the phageinfected bacteria in a colony kills another uninfected bacterium through phage missiles or antibacterial peptides [24, 25, 36–39, 41].

#### 2.1 Phage therapy, an alternative to antibiotics

Due to their specific antibacterial activities and significance of the phage therapy as an alternative to antibiotics, bacteriophage therapy is re-emerging, and consequently this has become a potentially novel and useful concept to kill even intracellular pathogenic bacteria and warrant future development. Bacteriophage therapy has been extended from medical applications into the fields of agriculture, aquaculture, and the food industry [28–30, 39]. Bacteriophages specific for Vibrio spp. have been described [36–41]. Bacteriophages are known to infect >140 bacterial

genera, and they are the most valuable and ubiquitous (1031) phage organisms in the world [26–35, 40–45]. Earliest description of phages and their antibacterial activity has been independently demonstrated [62]. D'Herelle [33] published a comprehensive account of phages, and hence the International Bacteriophage Institute was established in Tbilisi, Georgia, in 1923, now called as "the George Eliava Institute of Bacteriophages, Microbiology and Virology" [32, 34], which is still involved in researching phage therapy applications and supplies phage for the treatment of various bacterial infections. D'Herelle's first phage therapy experiments against bacterial dysentery were exceptionally successful and were very promising in the removal of the infectious organisms [32, 34]. However some of the results of the early phage therapy experiments of infectious host organisms were known to be contradictory with reports of both success and failure. Whenever failures occurred in phage therapy, they were attributed to a range of factors. They include unsatisfactory understanding of phage biology, inadequate experimental technical knowledge, poor quality of phage preparations, and a lack of understanding of the causes of illness being treated. The discovery of such specific bacteriophages were at first considered to become powerful beneficial therapeutic agents against pathogenic microorganisms but could not be put into practice because of the dawn of antibiotic era experiencing overuse/misuse of antibacterial medication that resulted in the development of untreatable antibiotic resistance [32, 36]. Commercialization of antibiotics in the Western countries in the 1940s had led to a simultaneous decline in the use of phages as human therapeutics, while in some of the Eastern European countries, exploitation of phage therapy was continued either alone or in combination with antibiotics [19, 34, 61–73]. The experimental phage therapy could be an alternative to antibiotics and replace them when they fail for the treatment of chronic infections, and such a successful eradication of drugresistant bacteria was documented [19, 42, 61–73]. Moreover, the significantly decline costs of phage therapy constitute an important additional battle for its wider application in the current era of a worldwide circumstance in antibiotic resistance. The efficacy of phage therapy is well recognized and demonstrated in a few cases [32, 64–66]. Even a single dose of phage was reported to be much more effective than multiple doses of antibiotics such as ampicillin, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol [66]. The use of phage therapy to control fish pathogens has also been reported [23, 24, 42, 43]. Phage lysins have been used as potential therapeutics for treatment of bacterial infections [44]. Furthermore, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved commercial phage preparations to prevent bacterial contaminations. Such developments have prompted to explore the possibilities of using bacteriophages to control bacterial infections in crustacean aquaculture [36–41]. Further cautious phage collection and perfect experimental conditions for phage propagation and purification, route and timing of phage administration, and environmental monitoring of phage for use are needed. Such a focus may help in further development of probiotics, phage therapy applicable to a wide variety of systems, which is considered to signify an emerging alternative to antibiotic therapy and vaccination.

animal by improving its intestinal microbial balance [82]. Lactic acid bacterium Bacillus S11 was tested as probiotics and has been proven as antagonists of shrimp pathogens [75]. Bacillus spores were used as biocontrol agents to reduce Vibrio species in shrimp culture facilities [83]. The inhibitory activity of Bacillus subtilis BT23, isolated from shrimp culture ponds, is against pathogenic Vibrio harveyi under in vitro and in vivo conditions [39, 73]. The concept of probiotics is exploited to "augment" naturally occurring pathogenic bacterial population to increase the growth rate and control diseases of organisms in aquaculture such as fish/shellfish [84, 85]. Several microorganisms have been evaluated as probiotics which have been shown to be successful in the larval stages of the aquatic organisms in preventing the diseases, improving digestion and growth [82, 84, 87]. Some of the proposed mechanisms that provide protection against pathogens involve the production of inhibitory compounds, competition for essential nutrients and adhesion sites, enhancement of disease resistance, and modulation of host immune responses [82, 87]. A probiotic containing a combination of several different bacteria has been shown to be more efficient at controlling bacterial pathogens [82, 90, 91]. Probiotics are known to act and inhibit the growth and proliferation of bacterial pathogens both in vivo and in vitro by generating antibacterial compounds such as bacteriocin, siderophores, lysozymes, proteases, hydrogen peroxide, antibiotics, and organic acids [91]. In aquaculture, some microorganisms are more beneficial to host organisms in reducing the incidence of diseases though the factors and mechanisms which mediate the benefits to the host are poorly understood. Future studies should be focused on evaluating the mechanisms by which the probiotics interact

Proprobiotic is defined as a synbiotic comprising pre- and probiotics involving a combination of strains of nonpathogenic bacteria and yeast so as to provide supplementary nutrients and to protect against invading pathogens. Commercially available proprobiotics are known to competitively exclude the potential pathogen through the use of proprobiotics in aquaculture. Effects of Ergosan and Vibromax are used to prevent vibriosis in Litopenaeus vannamei [42, 43]. Probiotics (e.g., Arda-Tek, Australia, viz. DMS1000, S-1100, DMS-2001, DMS-2002, DMS-2004, etc., Wunapuo-15 of Team Aqua Corporation) are used to reduce the number of Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria including Vibrio in the water and to maintain stable water quality, to stabilize plankton, to reduce rate of sludge buildup on the pond bottom, and to digest microbial slime [73, 82, 84–91]. To assess the actual impact of these probiotic products in the field, it is fundamental to determine the efficacy of the probiotics and the continuance of their application. The potency of the probiotic products against selected pathogenic bacteria (and viruses) also needs to be critically evaluated. The application of some beneficial bacteria has been an option in aquaculture to achieve a number of benefits, viz. to reduce mortality in shrimp, to enhance production and increase harvest yield and eliminate antibiotic use, and to enhance immunity and disease resistance in black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon by a probiont bacterium (Bacillus S11) [84–91]. Immunity enhancement occurs in black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon by a probiont bacterium (Bacillus S11), and the immune stimulator capacity of probiotics may be affected by factors such as source, type, dose, and duration of supplementation [80, 85]. The use of probiotic mixtures consisting of Bacillus tequilensis and B. endophyticus along with commercial probiotics was shown to be beneficial in altering the bacterial community of larval shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei when the hosts were challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Similarly application of Bacillus sp. promoted cellular and

with the host and pathogens and their biology.

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

2.3 Proprobiotics

127

#### 2.2 Probiotics in crustacean cultures

Probiotics are defined as applications of whole or components of microorganisms or "a live microbial adjunct which has a beneficial effect on the host by modifying the host-associated or ambient microbial community, by ensuring improved use of the feed or enhancing its nutritional value, by enhancing the host response towards disease, or by improving the quality of its ambient environment" [74–93]. A probiotic is a live microbial feed supplement which benefits the host

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

genera, and they are the most valuable and ubiquitous (1031) phage organisms in the world [26–35, 40–45]. Earliest description of phages and their antibacterial activity has been independently demonstrated [62]. D'Herelle [33] published a comprehensive account of phages, and hence the International Bacteriophage Institute was established in Tbilisi, Georgia, in 1923, now called as "the George Eliava Institute of Bacteriophages, Microbiology and Virology" [32, 34], which is still involved in researching phage therapy applications and supplies phage for the treatment of various bacterial infections. D'Herelle's first phage therapy experiments against bacterial dysentery were exceptionally successful and were very promising in the removal of the infectious organisms [32, 34]. However some of the results of the early phage therapy experiments of infectious host organisms were known to be contradictory with reports of both success and failure. Whenever failures occurred in phage therapy, they were attributed to a range of factors. They include unsatisfactory understanding of phage biology, inadequate experimental technical knowledge, poor quality of phage preparations, and a lack of understanding of the causes of illness being treated. The discovery of such specific bacteriophages were at first considered to become powerful beneficial therapeutic agents against pathogenic microorganisms but could not be put into practice because of the dawn of antibiotic era experiencing overuse/misuse of antibacterial medication that resulted in the development of untreatable antibiotic resistance [32, 36]. Commercialization of antibiotics in the Western countries in the 1940s had led to a simultaneous decline in the use of phages as human therapeutics, while in some of the Eastern European countries, exploitation of phage therapy was continued either alone or in combination with antibiotics [19, 34, 61–73]. The experimental phage therapy could be an alternative to antibiotics and replace them when they fail for the treatment of chronic infections, and such a successful eradication of drugresistant bacteria was documented [19, 42, 61–73]. Moreover, the significantly decline costs of phage therapy constitute an important additional battle for its wider application in the current era of a worldwide circumstance in antibiotic resistance. The efficacy of phage therapy is well recognized and demonstrated in a few cases [32, 64–66]. Even a single dose of phage was reported to be much more effective than multiple doses of antibiotics such as ampicillin, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol [66]. The use of phage therapy to control fish pathogens has also been reported [23, 24, 42, 43]. Phage lysins have been used as potential therapeutics for treatment of bacterial infections [44]. Furthermore, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved commercial phage preparations to prevent bacterial contaminations. Such developments have prompted to explore the possibilities of using bacteriophages to control bacterial infections in crustacean aquaculture [36–41]. Further cautious phage collection and perfect experimental conditions for phage propagation and purification, route and timing of phage administration, and environmental monitoring of phage for use are needed. Such a focus may help in further development of probiotics, phage therapy applicable to a wide variety of systems, which is considered to signify an emerging alternative to antibiotic therapy and

vaccination.

Crustacea

126

2.2 Probiotics in crustacean cultures

Probiotics are defined as applications of whole or components of microorgan-

isms or "a live microbial adjunct which has a beneficial effect on the host by modifying the host-associated or ambient microbial community, by ensuring improved use of the feed or enhancing its nutritional value, by enhancing the host response towards disease, or by improving the quality of its ambient environment" [74–93]. A probiotic is a live microbial feed supplement which benefits the host

animal by improving its intestinal microbial balance [82]. Lactic acid bacterium Bacillus S11 was tested as probiotics and has been proven as antagonists of shrimp pathogens [75]. Bacillus spores were used as biocontrol agents to reduce Vibrio species in shrimp culture facilities [83]. The inhibitory activity of Bacillus subtilis BT23, isolated from shrimp culture ponds, is against pathogenic Vibrio harveyi under in vitro and in vivo conditions [39, 73]. The concept of probiotics is exploited to "augment" naturally occurring pathogenic bacterial population to increase the growth rate and control diseases of organisms in aquaculture such as fish/shellfish [84, 85]. Several microorganisms have been evaluated as probiotics which have been shown to be successful in the larval stages of the aquatic organisms in preventing the diseases, improving digestion and growth [82, 84, 87]. Some of the proposed mechanisms that provide protection against pathogens involve the production of inhibitory compounds, competition for essential nutrients and adhesion sites, enhancement of disease resistance, and modulation of host immune responses [82, 87]. A probiotic containing a combination of several different bacteria has been shown to be more efficient at controlling bacterial pathogens [82, 90, 91]. Probiotics are known to act and inhibit the growth and proliferation of bacterial pathogens both in vivo and in vitro by generating antibacterial compounds such as bacteriocin, siderophores, lysozymes, proteases, hydrogen peroxide, antibiotics, and organic acids [91]. In aquaculture, some microorganisms are more beneficial to host organisms in reducing the incidence of diseases though the factors and mechanisms which mediate the benefits to the host are poorly understood. Future studies should be focused on evaluating the mechanisms by which the probiotics interact with the host and pathogens and their biology.

#### 2.3 Proprobiotics

Proprobiotic is defined as a synbiotic comprising pre- and probiotics involving a combination of strains of nonpathogenic bacteria and yeast so as to provide supplementary nutrients and to protect against invading pathogens. Commercially available proprobiotics are known to competitively exclude the potential pathogen through the use of proprobiotics in aquaculture. Effects of Ergosan and Vibromax are used to prevent vibriosis in Litopenaeus vannamei [42, 43]. Probiotics (e.g., Arda-Tek, Australia, viz. DMS1000, S-1100, DMS-2001, DMS-2002, DMS-2004, etc., Wunapuo-15 of Team Aqua Corporation) are used to reduce the number of Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria including Vibrio in the water and to maintain stable water quality, to stabilize plankton, to reduce rate of sludge buildup on the pond bottom, and to digest microbial slime [73, 82, 84–91]. To assess the actual impact of these probiotic products in the field, it is fundamental to determine the efficacy of the probiotics and the continuance of their application. The potency of the probiotic products against selected pathogenic bacteria (and viruses) also needs to be critically evaluated. The application of some beneficial bacteria has been an option in aquaculture to achieve a number of benefits, viz. to reduce mortality in shrimp, to enhance production and increase harvest yield and eliminate antibiotic use, and to enhance immunity and disease resistance in black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon by a probiont bacterium (Bacillus S11) [84–91]. Immunity enhancement occurs in black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon by a probiont bacterium (Bacillus S11), and the immune stimulator capacity of probiotics may be affected by factors such as source, type, dose, and duration of supplementation [80, 85]. The use of probiotic mixtures consisting of Bacillus tequilensis and B. endophyticus along with commercial probiotics was shown to be beneficial in altering the bacterial community of larval shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei when the hosts were challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Similarly application of Bacillus sp. promoted cellular and

humoral immune resistances and provided disease protection in tiger shrimp P. monodon. The effects of probiotics such as Bacillus cereus, Paenibacillus polymyxa, and Pseudomonas sp. PS-102 as biocontrol agents against pathogens of various Vibrio species in shrimp were evaluated. Growth promoter probiotics have been used in aquaculture to enhance the growth of cultivated species, whereas their side effects if any on the host need to be investigated. The probiotics was shown to increase the survival and growth of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei), and the production increased by 35%, whereas with the use of antimicrobials, it decreased by 94% and thus demonstrated the significance of endemic Bacillus probiotics on the improvement of the health of larval shrimp [71, 73]. The efficacy of the non-hemolytic probiotic Bacillus strains against pathogenic Vibrio species, viz. Vibrio campbellii, V. vulnificus, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. alginolyticus on the growth of the larval shrimp was tested by using a daily concentration of 1 105 cfu ml<sup>1</sup> with initial bioassay density of 225 nauplii L<sup>1</sup> , and the treatments promoted a considerable increase in survival and growth of the larval shrimp compared to the control, and thus the study has established a significant antagonistic activity of the probiotic Bacillus strains against the Vibrio species [48]. Various strains of Bacillus, or a commercial product made from Bacillus sp., Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Nitrosomonas sp., and Nitrobacter sp., used as probiotics show prevention of infection and promotion of growth rate of all the stages of the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei Boone and Fenneropenaeus indicus when the diet was supplemented with 50 g of probiotic kg<sup>1</sup> of food. The use of probiotic Shewanella algae in shrimp farms is found to be safe for the consumer of shrimp [92]. A scientific rational approach for the evaluation of aquaculture probiotics and guidelines is needed for their use and safety.

for large-scale losses in the aquaculture industry, leading to prophylactic as well as therapeutic use of antimicrobials [18–22, 70–73]. Antibiotics are used in shrimp farming to control or treat bacterial disease outbreaks with an expected 100,000– 200,000 tons of antibiotics being consumed in the world every year [57]. Oxytetracycline, tetracycline, quinolones, sulfonamides, and trimethoprim are among the antimicrobials utilized to control bacterial infections in the aquaculture industry. Indiscriminate prophylactic uses of diverse antibiotics in the shrimp hatcheries/ farms have resulted in antibiotic resistance of the bacteria causing mass mortalities of the hosts [73–75]. The potential negative consequences are the development of drug-resistant bacteria and reduced efficacy of antibiotic treatment. Shrimp farmers are exceedingly dependent on various antibiotics as a preventive measure against shrimp bacterial infections with 14% of farmers using antibiotics on a daily

All of the 121 isolates of Vibrio spp. were found to be 100% resistant to ampicillin, cloxacillin, oxacillin, erythromycin, vancomycin, penicillin G, and furazolidone and partially resistant to cefaclor, streptomycin, rifampicin, oxytetracycline, nalidixic acid, cefotaxime, and chlorotetracycline [14, 16]. Molitoris et al. [14] reported a high degree of resistance to ampicillin and furazolidone, and incidence of resistance to chloramphenicol, neomycin, and gentamycin has also been detected [16, 18–20, 22, 46, 69]. Multidrug-resistant Vibrio harveyi isolated from black gilldiseased Fenneropenaeus indicus and antibacterial activity against pathogenic Vibrio harveyi and its protective efficacy on juvenile F. indicus were reported. In vitro susceptibility of antibiotics against Vibrio spp. and Aeromonas spp. isolated from Penaeus monodon hatcheries and ponds and the effect of probiotics, antibiotics, and pathogenicity of Listonella anguillarum-like bacteria isolated from Penaeus monodon culture systems and antibiotic-resistant Vibrio spp. were commonly isolated from hatchery-reared postlarvae compared to farm-reared P. monodon [61, 62, 72, 73, 79, 85]. The unrelenting use of antibiotics against diseases in human beings and other life forms may pollute the aquatic system, and their impact on developing antibiotic-resistant Vibrio sp. may be a serious threat in addition to the use of antibiotics in aquaculture farms [63, 70]. Control of the bacterial diseases depends on improvement of management practices to minimize the risk of introduction of infectious agents into aquaculture systems and to reduce predisposing factors such

A study assessed a variety of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and detected the presence of their resistance genes from mariculture environments. A variety of antibiotics that were used in aquaculture have led to the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant genes in bacteria, and in these bacteria many different ARGs can be found, and they are β-lactam- and penicillin-resistant genes penA and blaTEM-1; chloramphenicolresistant genes catI, catII, catIII, catIV, and floR; tetracycline-resistant genes tatA, tatB, tatC, tatD, tatE, tatG, tatH, tatJ, tatY, and tatZ; and many more [65, 68]. ARGs can be transferred among bacteria via conjugation, transduction, or transformation. The widespread emergence of antimicrobial resistant bacteria worldwide has become a major therapeutic challenge. Therefore there is a need for development of novel non-antibiotic approach such as phage therapy biocontrol agents to fight against resistant bacterial infections due to the shortage of new antibiotics in developmental pipeline [19, 61–73]. Thiel [25] stated that phage therapy is "a nearly

2.6 Antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections in crustaceans

basis in their farms [22].

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

as overcrowding and overfeeding.

129

2.7 Antibiotic-resistant genes (ARGs)

#### 2.4 Bacillus for the control of vibriosis

Pathogenic Vibrio spp. were controlled by cell-free extracts of Bacillus under in vitro and in vivo conditions indicating that probiotic treatment offers a promising alternative to the use of antibiotics in shrimp aquaculture [41, 63, 70, 85]. Though probiotic bacteria are currently used to improve the health of the shrimp ponds and increase productivity and reduce mortality of prawns, little attention has been paid to bacteriophages preying on the probiotic bacteria of crustacean culture such as Vibrio/Bacillus spp. from aquaculture systems. A special focus needs to be given to bacteriophages infecting probiotic bacteria to explore the antibacterial potential of bacteriophages of Bacillus spp., Vibrio spp., and other bacteria. The existence of bacteriophages in the probiotic Bacillus sp. and Vibrio spp. controlling the infectivity of the Vibrio spp. with a significant reduction in the mortality of infected shrimp was demonstrated [37, 41]. Anti-Vibrio activities of Bacillus spp. mainly due to the production of bacteriocin or bacteriocin-like substances have been reported from B. subtilis, B. megaterium, B. stearothermophilus, B. licheniformis, B. thuringiensis, B. thermovorans, and B. cereus [16, 22, 45, 47, 68, 69, 83]. P. monodon larvae fed with Bacillus S11 showed 100% survival after challenge with pathogenic V. harveyi, whereas only 26% control animals survived.

#### 2.5 Antimicrobials

Vibrio species are Gram-negative curved rod-shaped bacteria that belong to the Vibrionaceae family, and they naturally inhabit the estuarine, coastal, and marine environment worldwide. Vibrio species occur as the dominant flora in all developmental stages of Penaeus monodon, and they have been described as the causal pathogens. Vibriosis is a severe bacterial disease in penaeid shrimp and is responsible Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

humoral immune resistances and provided disease protection in tiger shrimp P. monodon. The effects of probiotics such as Bacillus cereus, Paenibacillus polymyxa, and Pseudomonas sp. PS-102 as biocontrol agents against pathogens of various Vibrio species in shrimp were evaluated. Growth promoter probiotics have been used in aquaculture to enhance the growth of cultivated species, whereas their side effects if any on the host need to be investigated. The probiotics was shown to increase the survival and growth of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei), and the production increased by 35%, whereas with the use of antimicrobials, it decreased by 94% and thus demonstrated the significance of endemic Bacillus probiotics on the improvement of the health of larval shrimp [71, 73]. The efficacy of the non-hemolytic probiotic Bacillus strains against pathogenic Vibrio species, viz. Vibrio campbellii, V. vulnificus, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. alginolyticus on the growth of the larval shrimp was tested by using a daily concentration of 1 105 cfu ml<sup>1</sup> with initial

increase in survival and growth of the larval shrimp compared to the control, and thus the study has established a significant antagonistic activity of the probiotic Bacillus strains against the Vibrio species [48]. Various strains of Bacillus, or a commercial product made from Bacillus sp., Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Nitrosomonas sp., and Nitrobacter sp., used as probiotics show prevention of infection and promotion of growth rate of all the stages of the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei Boone and Fenneropenaeus indicus when the diet was supplemented with 50 g of probiotic kg<sup>1</sup> of food. The use of probiotic Shewanella algae in shrimp farms is found to be safe for the consumer of shrimp [92]. A scientific rational approach for the evaluation of aquaculture probiotics and guidelines is needed for their use and

Pathogenic Vibrio spp. were controlled by cell-free extracts of Bacillus under in vitro and in vivo conditions indicating that probiotic treatment offers a promising alternative to the use of antibiotics in shrimp aquaculture [41, 63, 70, 85]. Though probiotic bacteria are currently used to improve the health of the shrimp ponds and increase productivity and reduce mortality of prawns, little attention has been paid to bacteriophages preying on the probiotic bacteria of crustacean culture such as Vibrio/Bacillus spp. from aquaculture systems. A special focus needs to be given to bacteriophages infecting probiotic bacteria to explore the antibacterial potential of bacteriophages of Bacillus spp., Vibrio spp., and other bacteria. The existence of bacteriophages in the probiotic Bacillus sp. and Vibrio spp. controlling the infectivity of the Vibrio spp. with a significant reduction in the mortality of infected shrimp was demonstrated [37, 41]. Anti-Vibrio activities of Bacillus spp. mainly due to the production of bacteriocin or bacteriocin-like substances have been reported from B. subtilis, B. megaterium, B. stearothermophilus, B. licheniformis, B. thuringiensis, B. thermovorans, and B. cereus [16, 22, 45, 47, 68, 69, 83]. P. monodon larvae fed with Bacillus S11 showed 100% survival after challenge with pathogenic V. harveyi,

Vibrio species are Gram-negative curved rod-shaped bacteria that belong to the Vibrionaceae family, and they naturally inhabit the estuarine, coastal, and marine environment worldwide. Vibrio species occur as the dominant flora in all developmental stages of Penaeus monodon, and they have been described as the causal pathogens. Vibriosis is a severe bacterial disease in penaeid shrimp and is responsible

, and the treatments promoted a considerable

bioassay density of 225 nauplii L<sup>1</sup>

2.4 Bacillus for the control of vibriosis

whereas only 26% control animals survived.

2.5 Antimicrobials

128

safety.

Crustacea

for large-scale losses in the aquaculture industry, leading to prophylactic as well as therapeutic use of antimicrobials [18–22, 70–73]. Antibiotics are used in shrimp farming to control or treat bacterial disease outbreaks with an expected 100,000– 200,000 tons of antibiotics being consumed in the world every year [57]. Oxytetracycline, tetracycline, quinolones, sulfonamides, and trimethoprim are among the antimicrobials utilized to control bacterial infections in the aquaculture industry. Indiscriminate prophylactic uses of diverse antibiotics in the shrimp hatcheries/ farms have resulted in antibiotic resistance of the bacteria causing mass mortalities of the hosts [73–75]. The potential negative consequences are the development of drug-resistant bacteria and reduced efficacy of antibiotic treatment. Shrimp farmers are exceedingly dependent on various antibiotics as a preventive measure against shrimp bacterial infections with 14% of farmers using antibiotics on a daily basis in their farms [22].

#### 2.6 Antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections in crustaceans

All of the 121 isolates of Vibrio spp. were found to be 100% resistant to ampicillin, cloxacillin, oxacillin, erythromycin, vancomycin, penicillin G, and furazolidone and partially resistant to cefaclor, streptomycin, rifampicin, oxytetracycline, nalidixic acid, cefotaxime, and chlorotetracycline [14, 16]. Molitoris et al. [14] reported a high degree of resistance to ampicillin and furazolidone, and incidence of resistance to chloramphenicol, neomycin, and gentamycin has also been detected [16, 18–20, 22, 46, 69]. Multidrug-resistant Vibrio harveyi isolated from black gilldiseased Fenneropenaeus indicus and antibacterial activity against pathogenic Vibrio harveyi and its protective efficacy on juvenile F. indicus were reported. In vitro susceptibility of antibiotics against Vibrio spp. and Aeromonas spp. isolated from Penaeus monodon hatcheries and ponds and the effect of probiotics, antibiotics, and pathogenicity of Listonella anguillarum-like bacteria isolated from Penaeus monodon culture systems and antibiotic-resistant Vibrio spp. were commonly isolated from hatchery-reared postlarvae compared to farm-reared P. monodon [61, 62, 72, 73, 79, 85]. The unrelenting use of antibiotics against diseases in human beings and other life forms may pollute the aquatic system, and their impact on developing antibiotic-resistant Vibrio sp. may be a serious threat in addition to the use of antibiotics in aquaculture farms [63, 70]. Control of the bacterial diseases depends on improvement of management practices to minimize the risk of introduction of infectious agents into aquaculture systems and to reduce predisposing factors such as overcrowding and overfeeding.

#### 2.7 Antibiotic-resistant genes (ARGs)

A study assessed a variety of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and detected the presence of their resistance genes from mariculture environments. A variety of antibiotics that were used in aquaculture have led to the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant genes in bacteria, and in these bacteria many different ARGs can be found, and they are β-lactam- and penicillin-resistant genes penA and blaTEM-1; chloramphenicolresistant genes catI, catII, catIII, catIV, and floR; tetracycline-resistant genes tatA, tatB, tatC, tatD, tatE, tatG, tatH, tatJ, tatY, and tatZ; and many more [65, 68]. ARGs can be transferred among bacteria via conjugation, transduction, or transformation. The widespread emergence of antimicrobial resistant bacteria worldwide has become a major therapeutic challenge. Therefore there is a need for development of novel non-antibiotic approach such as phage therapy biocontrol agents to fight against resistant bacterial infections due to the shortage of new antibiotics in developmental pipeline [19, 61–73]. Thiel [25] stated that phage therapy is "a nearly

forgotten therapy that may yet re-emerge as a savior to this accelerating crisis of antibiotic resistance. For every bacterium known on this planet, there are legions of bacteriophages—tiny viruses that seek out bacteria and use them as a breeding ground, almost invariably destroying their prokaryotic host in the process. That makes them harmless to even to nontarget bacteria—distinguishing them from broadspectrum antibiotics, which, when they work, can wipe out beneficial flora along with a troublesome infection." The phage specificity has its drawbacks as there is a requirement of the right match between phage and bacteria which needs to be determined for the phage therapy to work. There has been renewed concern in the application of bacteriophage as a non-antibiotic approach to control bacterial infections in various fields including human infections, food safety, agriculture, and veterinary applications. However the guideline data on the use of phage therapy applied to invertebrates, like shrimp and other crustaceans, are nonexistent [64, 68, 92, 93].

#### 2.8 Bacteriophage therapy for biocontrol of vibriosis in crustaceans

A bacteriophage isolated from a shrimp hatchery was shown to infect V. harveyi, signifying its potential as a biocontrol agent of luminous vibriosis. In vitro treatments of bacteriophages were shown to exhibit a significant reduction (2–3 log units) in the number of V. harveyi host cells [41, 46, 48, 49]. These studies showed that bacteriophages could be used for biocontrol of V. harveyi and that bacteriophage therapy could be effective as an alternative to antibiotics in the control of luminous vibriosis in shrimp hatchery systems [23–69]. In vitro experiments confirmed that bacteriophages could be effectively used in vivo as biological agents to control Vibrio sp. in aquaculture systems [36–39, 41, 46, 48, 49]. Investigation on the occurrences of luminescent V. harveyi and their bacteriophages in shrimp showed that the presence of low concentrations of bacteriophages in the larval rearing tank waters could not prevent the development of luminous vibriosis [46–49], and this study showed that the presence of optimal concentration of phages is required for effective reduction of the pathogenic bacteria. A lytic spectrum of bacteriophages (Viha1, Viha2, Viha3, Viha4, Viha6, Viha7) occurring in nature exhibited a wide spectrum of activity against V. harveyi, suggesting their potential as agents for biocontrol of vibriosis in aquaculture environments [51]. A lytic phage (PW2) was isolated and characterized under controlled conditions in the laboratory from the host bacterium V. harveyi CS101 [49], and the useful bacteriophages for the biocontrol of vibriosis have been explored. A probiotic strain V. alginolyticus reduced the diseases and mortality of infected P. monodon with A. salmonicida, V. anguillarum, and V. ordalli [49]. A soil bacterial strain, PM-4, was shown to exhibit in vitro inhibitory effect against V. anguillarum and to promote the growth of P. monodon nauplius [53]. Inoculation of Bacillus S11, a saprophytic strain, resulted in greater survival of the post-larval P. monodon that were challenged with pathogenic luminescent bacterial culture [51]. These works strongly suggest an effective control of microflora in crustaceans can be achieved in aquaculture environments by bacteriophage-producing bacteria. The crustacean host, causative agent, diseases, and source of bacteriophages/bacteria are listed in Table 2.

#### 2.9 In vitro and in vivo effects of Bacillus against vibriosis in shrimp

In vitro and in vivo antagonistic effects of Bacillus against the pathogenic Vibrio species were evaluated [40]. Cell-free extracts of Bacillus subtilis BT23 were shown to exhibit inhibitory effects against the growth and proliferation of Vibrio harveyi isolated from black gill-diseased Penaeus monodon. The probiotic effect of Bacillus

Crustacean

131

Bacterial agent

 Infection/

Bacteriophage

 Source of the

Efficacy of

bacteriophage

 Outcome of the phage therapy

 References

bacteriophage

disease

host

Shrimp larvae

Vibrio harveyi

Luminous

Myoviridae (VHLM)

 Extracted from a

Vibriolysis

VHML showed a narrow host

[100]

range with a preference for

V. harveyi rather than 63 other

Vibrio isolates and 10 other

genera

Enhanced survival (80%) of

[48]

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

> P. monodon larvae on treatment

with two doses of when compared with the control

(25%). Hatchery trial: survival in

the control tank was only 17%,

while in survival was 40%; in the

bacteriophage-treated

survival was 86%. therapy has an excellent potential

in

management

vibriosis in aquaculture

 of luminous

 systems

 tank, Bacteriophage

antibiotic-treated

 tanks,

bacteriophage

toxin-producing

strain of V. harveyi

isolated from moribund prawn

vibriosis

Penaeus

monodon

Shrimp larvae

Vibrio harveyi

Luminous

Siphoviridae

Shrimp farm waters

18-day-old PL shrimp were

challenged with the bacteria (105

cells ml1, laboratory trial: (1)

bacteriophage

(109 pfu ml1) was added

initially; after 24 h (another

0.1 ml), (2) only once initially

with 0.1 ml of the phage

suspension;

Hatchery trial (1) treatment with

bacteriophage

the rate of 200 ppm daily so that

phage

was 29

treatment with antibiotics

(oxytetracycline

kanamycin

treatment

Hatchery tanks, with post-larval

Bacteriophage

in over 85% survival of Penaeus

monodon larvae. The normal hatchery practice of antibiotic

treatment resulted in a survival

range from 65 to 68%.

This study shows that

bacteriophages

biocontrol of V. harveyi

 could be used for

 treatment resulted

[46]

five-stage larvae, presenting

luminescence

were used.

treatment (two tanks): one

suspension (29 106 pfu ml1) was

added by day following the

order: Viha10, Viha8, Viha10,

and Viha8

chemotherapy

 (two

Bacteriophage

 and mortality,

Larval shrimp

Vibrio harveyi

Luminous

Siphoviridae

Three from oyster

tissue and one from

shrimp hatchery

water

vibriosis

Penaeus

monodon

 10 ppm daily); (3) no

 5 ppm,

–105 pfu ml1; (2)

concentration

 in the water

 (109 pfu ml1) at

 (3) no addition.

 suspension

from the West coast

of India

vibriosis

Penaeus

monodon


Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

forgotten therapy that may yet re-emerge as a savior to this accelerating crisis of antibiotic resistance. For every bacterium known on this planet, there are legions of bacteriophages—tiny viruses that seek out bacteria and use them as a breeding ground, almost invariably destroying their prokaryotic host in the process. That makes them harmless to even to nontarget bacteria—distinguishing them from broadspectrum antibiotics, which, when they work, can wipe out beneficial flora along with a troublesome infection." The phage specificity has its drawbacks as there is a requirement of the right match between phage and bacteria which needs to be determined for the phage therapy to work. There has been renewed concern in the application of bacteriophage as a non-antibiotic approach to control bacterial infections in various fields including human infections, food safety, agriculture, and veterinary applications. However the guideline data on the use of phage therapy applied to invertebrates, like shrimp and other crustaceans, are nonexistent

2.8 Bacteriophage therapy for biocontrol of vibriosis in crustaceans

agent, diseases, and source of bacteriophages/bacteria are listed in Table 2.

In vitro and in vivo antagonistic effects of Bacillus against the pathogenic Vibrio species were evaluated [40]. Cell-free extracts of Bacillus subtilis BT23 were shown to exhibit inhibitory effects against the growth and proliferation of Vibrio harveyi isolated from black gill-diseased Penaeus monodon. The probiotic effect of Bacillus

2.9 In vitro and in vivo effects of Bacillus against vibriosis in shrimp

A bacteriophage isolated from a shrimp hatchery was shown to infect V. harveyi, signifying its potential as a biocontrol agent of luminous vibriosis. In vitro treatments of bacteriophages were shown to exhibit a significant reduction (2–3 log units) in the number of V. harveyi host cells [41, 46, 48, 49]. These studies showed that bacteriophages could be used for biocontrol of V. harveyi and that bacteriophage therapy could be effective as an alternative to antibiotics in the control of luminous vibriosis in shrimp hatchery systems [23–69]. In vitro experiments confirmed that bacteriophages could be effectively used in vivo as biological agents to control Vibrio sp. in aquaculture systems [36–39, 41, 46, 48, 49]. Investigation on the occurrences of luminescent V. harveyi and their bacteriophages in shrimp showed that the presence of low concentrations of bacteriophages in the larval rearing tank waters could not prevent the development of luminous vibriosis [46–49], and this study showed that the presence of optimal concentration of phages is required for effective reduction of the pathogenic bacteria. A lytic spectrum of bacteriophages (Viha1, Viha2, Viha3, Viha4, Viha6, Viha7) occurring in nature exhibited a wide spectrum of activity against V. harveyi, suggesting their potential as agents for biocontrol of vibriosis in aquaculture environments [51]. A lytic phage (PW2) was isolated and characterized under controlled conditions in the laboratory from the host bacterium V. harveyi CS101 [49], and the useful bacteriophages for the biocontrol of vibriosis have been explored. A probiotic strain V. alginolyticus reduced the diseases and mortality of infected P. monodon with A. salmonicida, V. anguillarum, and V. ordalli [49]. A soil bacterial strain, PM-4, was shown to exhibit in vitro inhibitory effect against V. anguillarum and to promote the growth of P. monodon nauplius [53]. Inoculation of Bacillus S11, a saprophytic strain, resulted in greater survival of the post-larval P. monodon that were challenged with pathogenic luminescent bacterial culture [51]. These works strongly suggest an effective control of microflora in crustaceans can be achieved in aquaculture environments by bacteriophage-producing bacteria. The crustacean host, causative

[64, 68, 92, 93].

Crustacea

130


Crustacean

133

Bacterial agent

 Infection/

Bacteriophage

 Source of the

Efficacy of

bacteriophage

 Outcome of the phage therapy

infection to 80% and continued

to increase to 90% within 30 min

of infection. The stability of

phage PW2 was dependent on

temperature

inactivated

for 30 min and by treating at pH

2, 3, 11, and 12. One-step growth

curve and latent and burst periods were 30 and 120 min,

respectively,

78 pfu per infected center. Six

structural proteins were detected

In the antibiotic

5 ppm, kanamycin

day)-treated

initial reduction of luminous bacterial counts were shown, and

after 48 h the bacterial count

increased to 106 ml1 showing

the luminous vibriosis and mortality of the nauplii of

Penaeus monodon with 40% larval

survival. In contrast, in the

bacteriophage-treated

larval survival was 86%, and the

survival rate in the control tank

was only 17%

Shrimp,

V. vulnificus

Vibriosis

 Phages VV1, VV2,

VV1, VV2, VV3, and

In vitro experiments successful potential phage therapy; lytic V. vulnificus phages

 show

V. vulnificus phages exhibited a

[36–39]

broad lytic spectrum and

potential biocontrol of luminous

VV4 phages were

detected from

VV3, and VV4 from

V. vulnificus

P. monodon

 tank, the

 hatchery tanks, an

 100 ppm/

(oxytetracycline

[48, 49]

Larval shrimp

V. harveyi

Luminous

ϕH17-5c, ϕH17-7b,

Secluded from

In a set of laboratory

experiments,

monodon was exposed to

106 cfu ml1 cells of Vibrio

 post-larval Penaeus

shrimp farm water

from the West coast

of India and demonstrated

exhibit a broad lytic

activity against

V. harveyi isolates

 to

harveyi and was treated with

100 ppm phage which has led to

a drastic reduction of Vibrio harveyi counts with 86% survival

of the infected larvae, while the

survival of the larvae was 25%

phage-untreated

ϕH17-8b, and

ϕH17-9b

vibriosis

P. monodon

 with a burst size of

 by heating at 90°C

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

> and pH. It was

 References

bacteriophage

disease

host


Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

Crustacean

132

Bacterial agent

 Infection/

Bacteriophage

 Source of the

Efficacy of

tanks):

(5 mg L1), kanamycin

(10 mg L1

)

All the phages were found to be

[51]

highly lytic for V. harveyi. The

phages exhibited a different lytic

spectrum for a large number of

bacterial isolates tested. Three of

the phages (Viha1, Viha3, and

Viha7) caused 65% of the strains

to lyse, while Viha2, Viha4, and

Viha6 caused 40% of the host strains to lyse. Only Viha5 had a

narrow spectrum (14%). Six of

the seven phages isolated had a

broad lytic spectrum and could

be potential candidates for

biocontrol of V. harveyi in

aquaculture

Shrimp

Vibrio harveyi

Luminous

Siphoviridae (VH1

Shrimp farm

In vitro

experiment

All the isolates of

(VH1–VH8)

host bacterial cells within 2 h.

The propagation phage showed a burst time from

1 to 10 h. Vibrio sp. shall be effectively used in vivo as biological agents

to control these pathogenic

bacteria in aquaculture Phage adsorption rate increased

rapidly in the first 15 min of

 systems [52]

Bacteriophages

 of

 curve for each

 caused lysis of the

bacteriophage

[39]

vibriosis

to VH8)

P. monodon

Shrimp

Vibrio harveyi

Luminous

Siphoviridae (phage

Shrimp pond water

PW2)

vibriosis

CS101

P. monodon

oxytetracycline

bacteriophage

 Outcome of the phage therapy

 References

Crustacea

bacteriophage

disease

host

Penaeid shrimp

Vibrio harveyi

Luminous

Seven

Coastal aquaculture

systems like shrimp

farms, hatcheries,

and tidal creeks along the East and

West coast of India

bacteriophages

specific to Vibrio

harveyi (Viha1 to

Viha7), six from

Siphoviridae and

one (Viha4)

Myoviridae

vibriosis

P. monodon


Crustacean

135

Bacterial agent

 Infection/

Bacteriophage

 Source of the

Efficacy of

bacteriophage

 Outcome of the phage therapy

system of phyllosoma tropical rock lobster, P. ornatus

In vivo phage cocktail consisting of φSt2

and φGrn1, directly on live prey

A. salina 93% decrease of Vibrio

population,

V. harveyi, V.

V. ordalii, V.

 viz. V. alginolyticus,

parahaemolyticus,

anguillarum,

cultures, has led to a

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

administration

 of the

[98, 99]

 of the

 References

bacteriophage

disease

host

Live prey

V. alginolyticus

Vibriosis

 Two novel

Vibrio alginolyticus

In vitro cell lysis experiments

against the bacterial host V.

alginolyticus strain V1 and also

against 12 Vibrio strains

originating from live prey

Artemia salina anguillarum, V. harveyi, V.

alginolyticus, V. ordalii, V.

parahaemolyticus,

and V. owensii). It indicated a

strong lytic efficacy of the 2

phages

V. brine shrimp nauplii were treated

with a single dosage of VPMS1

phage, which was effective

enough to eliminate the adverse

effects of V. brine shrimp. Efficacy was not

affected by the reduction in the

dosage

parahaemolyticus

 in

parahaemolyticus-infected

The phage therapy was

[97]

successful in preventing

vibriosis; a single dosage of

VPMS1 phage was effective

enough to get rid of the adverse

effects of V. brine shrimp; the beneficial

effects of the therapy were

compromised

of phages was delayed

 if the application

parahaemolyticus

 in

Brine shrimp

V.

parahaemolyticus

Vibriosis of

VPMS1 phage

 VPMS1 is a lytic

phage of Vibrio

parahaemolyticus,

isolated from a

marine clam

Artemia

franciscana

nauplii Artemia

franciscana

Penaeus

Vibrio

Vibrio

Lytic phage (VVP1)

Lytic phage (VVP1)

One-step growth

multiplication

and pH and temperature

 and host range,

 stability

experiments,

P. monodon larvae infected with

[101]

V. enhanced survival of the larvae

in the presence of phage

treatment at lytic phage (VVP1),

2.3 1010 PFU ml1, when

compared with the control and

parahaemolyticus

 showed

able to infect strains

of N1A and N7A,

V. and strains of N3B

and N13B Vibrio

alginolyticus

parahaemolyticus,

of the lytic phage (VVP1) were

shown; the phage showed

protective biocontrol effects in

reducing the pathogenic V.

parahaemolyticus

parahaemolyticus

belongs to the

Myoviridae family

and its potential lytic phage from

Penaeus monodon

monodon rearing

waters in shrimp ponds in

Palk Strait, South East coast

of India

 V.

splendidus,

V. after 4 h of treatment

splendidus, and V. owensii,

cultures, viz. V.

strain V1, isolated

during a vibriosis

outbreak in cultured

seabream

bacteriophages

and φGrn1

 φSt2

strain V1

Artemia salina


Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

Crustacean

134

Bacterial agent

 Infection/

Bacteriophage

 Source of the

Efficacy of

bacteriophage

 Outcome of the phage therapy

 References

Crustacea

bacteriophage

shrimp aquaculture

infect a wide variety of other

vibriosis in the shrimp

aquaculture

Exhibited a clear lytic activity

[55]

against V. harveyi with no

apparent transducing

 properties.

 system

Vibrio

spp./isolates

system

disease

host

Phyllosoma

V. harveyi

Luminous

Six from (VhCCS-01,

VhCCS-02,

04, VhCCS-06,

VhCCS-17,

VhCCS-20)

from (VhCCS-19

VhCCS-21)

 and

Myoviridae

samples from

discharge channels

and grow-out ponds

of a prawn farm

 and two

 and

 VhCCS-

larval phyllosomas of the ornate spiny

lobster ornatus water

Panulirus

(1 ml) 6 h after

Bacteria-free

obtained by 10,000 g for 15 min and by filtration of the aliquots of the

enriched water samples;

supernatants

inoculated onto NAMS plates,

grown at 28°C for 24 h, and the

bacteria-free

stored at 4°C

supernatants

 were

 (10 ll) were

supernatants

centrifugation

 at

in the host bacteria (V. harveyi

strain 12); (VhCCS-06)

a broth culture of V. harveyi

strain 12 into exponential growth, though it could not

prevent the overall growth of the

bacterial strain. This effect was

due to the phage-resistant

V. harveyi. Phage resistance is an

obstacle to the use of phage as

therapeutic

phages exhibited lytic activity

against strains of V. harveyi, a

primary pathogen of phyllosoma

of the tropical rock lobster,

P. ornatus. These phages can be

used as a biocontrol agent to

combat vibriosis in the rearing

 agents. The isolated

 cells of

multiplication

 of

 delayed the entry of

Siphoviridae phage

 were

induce

bacteriocin

 production

Siphoviridae

epizootic in

aquaculture-reared

(1) Addition of phage VhCCS-06

(1 ml) 2 h after inoculation; addition of phage VhCCS-06

 (2)

Phages of VhCCS-19 and VhCCS-

21 are

Myoviridae

bacteriophages

 and lysogenic and

bacteriophages

Isolated from an

Exhibited a clear lytic activity

against V. harveyi

vibriosis

larvae of the tropical rock

lobster

Panulirus

ornatus


Table 2. Crustacean host, bacteria, disease, and source of bacteriophages/bacteria for bacteriotherapy. was tested by exposing shrimp to B. subtilis BT23 at a density of 10

3 /10

(Figure 1a-f). Probiotic treatment of B. subtilis BT23 showed a 90% reduction in accumulated mortality of P. monodon. Pathogenic Vibrio species were controlled by Bacillus under in vitro and in vivo conditions, and the results indicated that probiotic treatment offers a promising alternative to the use of antibiotics in shrimp aquacul-

(a) Light micrograph of uninfected Bacillus sp.; (b) TEM micrograph showing phages on the surface of the infected Bacillus. (c) TEM micrograph of phage-lysed bacterial cell. (d) TEM micrograph of uninfected Vibrio cells. (e) TEM micrograph of phage-infected Vibrio cell. (f) TEM micrograph of phage-lysed Vibrio cell.

The occurrence of phages in infected cells of Bacillus sp. is illustrated

(Figure 1a-c). Each bacteriophage particle of the bacterium Bacillus sp. presented as electron-dense objects comprising a distinctive head with a flexible noncontractile

phage infection, and the TEM of such experimentally phage-infected cells showed actively adsorbing and infecting phages onto the surface of bacterial cell membrane (Figure 1b), while phage particles occurred within the completely lysed cells in

phages with a double-layer membrane covering the icosahedral head. Phageuninfected, phage-infected, and completely lysed Vibrio cells are shown

TEM analysis of the phages of Vibrio host cells showed the occurrence of tailless

An antagonism assay consisting of cell-free extract of Bacillus BT21, Bacillus BT22, and B. subtilis BT23 showed inhibitory activity against several pathogenic species of Vibrio [40]. They reported that B. subtilis BT23 exhibits a relatively higher inhibitory activity than the other two Bacillus BT21 and Bacillus BT22. Moreover B. subtilis BT23 was shown to inhibit the growth and proliferation of 112 isolates of Vibrio spp. consisting of V. harveyi (39 isolates), V. anguillarum (24 isolates), V. vulnificus (30 isolates), and V. damsela (19 isolates) which were obtained from P. monodon culture hatcheries and ponds. The growth and proliferation of pathogenic V. harveyi was inhibited by B. subtilis BT23 culture inoculated at a preliminary level

total viable counts of V. harveyi. Co-culture experiments demonstrated that the growth and proliferation of V. harveyi was controlled under in vitro conditions when the concentrations of B. subtilis BT23 were increased. Experiments of cell-free

, whereas lower concentrations of B. subtilis BT23 (10

) allowed early growth and proliferation followed by a decrease in the

<sup>4</sup> cfu ml

–2 h exposures of Bacillus cells to in vitro

6 days before a challenge with V. harveyi at 10

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

tail. The preparations consisted of 30 min

2.10 Antagonism of Bacillus against Vibrio spp.

ture.

Figure 1.

8–24 h (Figure 1c).

(Figure 1d–f).

of 10 5 –10

<sup>7</sup> cfu ml 1

10

137

<sup>9</sup> cfu ml 1 6 /10

<sup>1</sup> for 1 h infection

<sup>8</sup> cfu ml <sup>1</sup> for

<sup>5</sup> and

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

Figure 1.

(a) Light micrograph of uninfected Bacillus sp.; (b) TEM micrograph showing phages on the surface of the infected Bacillus. (c) TEM micrograph of phage-lysed bacterial cell. (d) TEM micrograph of uninfected Vibrio cells. (e) TEM micrograph of phage-infected Vibrio cell. (f) TEM micrograph of phage-lysed Vibrio cell.

was tested by exposing shrimp to B. subtilis BT23 at a density of 10<sup>6</sup> /10<sup>8</sup> cfu ml<sup>1</sup> for 6 days before a challenge with V. harveyi at 10<sup>3</sup> /10<sup>4</sup> cfu ml<sup>1</sup> for 1 h infection (Figure 1a-f). Probiotic treatment of B. subtilis BT23 showed a 90% reduction in accumulated mortality of P. monodon. Pathogenic Vibrio species were controlled by Bacillus under in vitro and in vivo conditions, and the results indicated that probiotic treatment offers a promising alternative to the use of antibiotics in shrimp aquaculture.

The occurrence of phages in infected cells of Bacillus sp. is illustrated (Figure 1a-c). Each bacteriophage particle of the bacterium Bacillus sp. presented as electron-dense objects comprising a distinctive head with a flexible noncontractile tail. The preparations consisted of 30 min–2 h exposures of Bacillus cells to in vitro phage infection, and the TEM of such experimentally phage-infected cells showed actively adsorbing and infecting phages onto the surface of bacterial cell membrane (Figure 1b), while phage particles occurred within the completely lysed cells in 8–24 h (Figure 1c).

TEM analysis of the phages of Vibrio host cells showed the occurrence of tailless phages with a double-layer membrane covering the icosahedral head. Phageuninfected, phage-infected, and completely lysed Vibrio cells are shown (Figure 1d–f).

#### 2.10 Antagonism of Bacillus against Vibrio spp.

An antagonism assay consisting of cell-free extract of Bacillus BT21, Bacillus BT22, and B. subtilis BT23 showed inhibitory activity against several pathogenic species of Vibrio [40]. They reported that B. subtilis BT23 exhibits a relatively higher inhibitory activity than the other two Bacillus BT21 and Bacillus BT22. Moreover B. subtilis BT23 was shown to inhibit the growth and proliferation of 112 isolates of Vibrio spp. consisting of V. harveyi (39 isolates), V. anguillarum (24 isolates), V. vulnificus (30 isolates), and V. damsela (19 isolates) which were obtained from P. monodon culture hatcheries and ponds. The growth and proliferation of pathogenic V. harveyi was inhibited by B. subtilis BT23 culture inoculated at a preliminary level of 10<sup>5</sup> –10<sup>9</sup> cfu ml<sup>1</sup> , whereas lower concentrations of B. subtilis BT23 (105 and 10<sup>7</sup> cfu ml<sup>1</sup> ) allowed early growth and proliferation followed by a decrease in the total viable counts of V. harveyi. Co-culture experiments demonstrated that the growth and proliferation of V. harveyi was controlled under in vitro conditions when the concentrations of B. subtilis BT23 were increased. Experiments of cell-free

Crustacean

136

Bacterial agent

 Infection/

Bacteriophage

 Source of the

Efficacy of

parahaemolyticus

shrimp larvae

 in infected

showed that the application phage therapy is a useful strategy

to prevent and eliminate or

reduce shrimp pathogenic

V.

parahaemolyticus

aquaculture

Infect bacteria, viz. V.

[101]

 system

 in the

 of

bacteriophage

 Outcome of the phage therapy

 References

Crustacea

bacteriophage

disease

host

V. alginolyticus

V. alginolyticus,

Vibriosis, a

Phage pVa-21,

Phage pVa-21 infects

Bacteriophage

Myoviridae,

candidate biocontrol agent

against V. alginolyticus. planktonic or biofilm lytic activity and showed stability

under various conditions. latent period and burst size

approximately

plaque-forming

respectively.

inhibit bacterial growth in both

the planktonic and biofilm states.

The phage is related to the giant phiKZ-like phages, classified as a

new member of the phiKZ-like

bacteriophages

bacteria belonging to the family

Vibrionaceae

Table 2. Crustacean

 host, bacteria, disease, and source of

bacteriophages/bacteria

 for

bacteriotherapy.

 that infect

 Phage pVa-21 can

 units/cell,

 70 min and 58

 It has

 It exhibits

characterized

 as a

alginolyticus and V. harveyi in

both the planktonic and biofilm

states

 pVa-21 belongs to

> bacteria belonging

to the family Vibrionaceae, viz. V.

alginolyticus and V.

harveyi, and could

not infect

V. V. anguillarum, V. campbellii, and

V. vulnificus

parahaemolyticus,

Myoviridae

zoonotic

pathogen causing

mass mortality in

aquatic animals

and infecting

humans

Vibrio alginolyticus,

phages were

isolated from

a zoonotic

seawater

pathogen that

causes mass mortality in

aquatic animals

and infects humans

samples after

enrichment

extracts of Bacillus subtilis BT23 established the inhibitory effects on the growth and proliferation of V. harveyi in liquid culture under aerobic conditions. The inhibitory efficacy was higher in B. subtilis BT23 cell-free extracts of 10<sup>8</sup> cfu ml<sup>1</sup> and low in 10<sup>4</sup> cfu ml<sup>1</sup> . Cell-free extracts of Bacillus subtilis BT23 initially could not limit the growth and proliferation of V. harveyi for 2 days, and afterward the growth and proliferation of V. harveyi was extremely inhibited when compared with the growth of V. harveyi without B. subtilis BT23. The studies on the probiotic treatment V. harveyi-infected P. monodon revealed a substantial reduction in the mortality of shrimp which were treated with B. subtilis BT23 strains under in vivo conditions. The cumulative mortality of V. harveyi post-infection and probiotic B. subtilis BT23 untreated P. monodon was 50% on the ninth day and 100% on the seventeenth day of post-infection. In contrast, in the probiotic treatment groups, the cumulative mortality of shrimp was 10% in the combined treatment after 5 days post-infection. Long-term and short-term treatments of V. harveyi-infected P. monodon with B. subtilis BT23 showed a decrease in cumulative mortality of 32 and 60%, respectively. In control groups of V. harveyi-uninfected P. monodon, there was no mortality. The growth of pathogenic V. harveyi was inhibited by nonpathogenic B. subtilis BT23 under in vivo and in vitro conditions. Co-culture experiments showed that the inhibitory activity of B. subtilis BT23 increased with increasing density of the antagonist. A high concentration of B. subtilis BT23 (antagonist) was essential to obstruct the growth and multiplication of V. harveyi in the co-culture experiments. The antagonist required being present at significantly higher levels than the pathogen, and the degree of inhibition increased with the level of antagonist. During the co-culture, 10<sup>7</sup> /10<sup>8</sup> cfu ml<sup>1</sup> was required to inhibit the growth of the pathogen V. harveyi. Therefore, a potential probiotic co-culture must either be supplied on a regular basis or be able to colonize and multiply on or in the host. A similar control of pathogenic Vibrio in fish and shellfish, by the use of nonpathogenic bacterial strains and disease prevention, has received much attention during the last decade [42, 43, 56, 81]. Purification and characterization of the antibacterial substances from the host bacteria and the phages could help to understand the mechanism of antibacterial activity of Bacillus and other strains. Probiotic treatment offers a very promising alternative to the use of antibiotics in fish and shrimp aquaculture. Further study is needed to elucidate the exact mode of action of the observed beneficial effects of the probiotics and to understand the possibilities and limitations of microbial control in aquaculture.

infectivity of several phages were reported. Proteinase K treatment could not alter the adsorption ability of phage particles. These studies show that binding of the phages to its host cell membrane is the first step of lytic cycle and this can be an irreversible mechanism, and a similar mechanism may exist in the infection of vibriophages as the infectivity of the phages were inhibited by lysozyme and SDS treatments. Treatment with 1% SDS did not affect the adsorption ability of phage particles. Similarly Mycoplasma arthritidis virulent 1 (MAV1) phage infectivity was reported to be unaffected by treatment with Triton X-100 and was resistant to nonionic detergents. Vibrio phages were found to be fairly resistant to chloroform [46, 101]. Further studies on the proteins and lipids of V. vulnificus phages may help us to understand their role in the life cycle and infectivity of phages. V. vulnificus phages survived 100% at pH 7 and exhibited infectivity, while none of the phages survived at extreme pH conditions (pH 3 and pH 12) [41]. V. harveyi phages were inactivated at pH 3 or less and at pH 12 or greater. In contrast, VPP97 phage was totally inactivated at pH below 5 or over 10. All V. vulnificus phages from the shrimp Penaeus monodon exhibited optimal survival at 37°C, but infectivity occurred, and plaques were observed up to a maximum temperature of 50°C [41]. JSF9 phage was shown to be stable at a temperature below 37°C, and the phages were rapidly inactivated above 50°C temperature. V. parahaemolyticus phage (VPP97) has been shown to be stable up to a temperature of 65°C and was totally inactivated at 70°C [41, 54, 58, 77, 101]. Phages were reported to survive extremes of temperature up to 95°C [54]. Phages, viz. T-ϕD0, T-ϕD2S, T-ϕHSIC, and T-ϕD1B, exhibited a latent period ranging from 90 to 180 min [77]. The results have clearly shown the physicochemical parameters are very important for the survival and infectivity of phages [37, 38, 46, 49]. Additional studies related to infectivity, stage specific expression of proteins, and specific effects of the purified phage proteins are needed to better understand their functions and applications in the control and process of infectivity

Phage therapy is a re-emerging field, and the bacteriophages represent potential biocontrol agents for the control of virulent and drug-resistant bacteria [19, 23–73]. However the use of phage therapy in shrimp is still in its early years, and these are highlighted especially the need for using more than one kind of bacteriophage in aquaculture to evade development of bacterial resistance [47–49, 58–60]. Phage therapy has been effectively used to protect against Vibrio diseases in a shrimp and prawn hatchery. Inhibitory effects of bacteriophages against shrimp pathogenic Vibrio spp., efficacy of potential phage cocktails against Vibrio harveyi and closely related Vibrio species isolated from shrimp, morphological characterization and biocontrol effects of Vibrio vulnificus phages against vibriosis in the shrimp, and a phage therapy in aquaculture system have been described [37–39, 41]. Four new V. vulnificus phages were detected from shrimp aquaculture system, named VV1, VV2, VV3, and VV4 [39]. All lytic V. vulnificus phages belonged to Tectiviridae family with typical double-layered elongated icosahedral head and tailless morphology [39, 101]. Lytic V. vulnificus phages which infect other Vibrio isolates were further characterized for long-term storage by enzyme treatment, organic solvent treatment, detergent treatment, pH stability, temperature stability, and agar bioassay method and one-step growth experiment. The infectivity, growth, and multiplication of VV1, VV2, VV3, and VV4 phages were unaffected by the treatment effects of chloroform, acetone, ethyl alcohol, methyl alcohol, ribonuclease (RNase), tryp-

sin, protease, and Triton-X100. The phages (VV1–VV4) were inactivated completely with temperature (over 60°C), pH (below 3 and above 12), and

of V. vulnificus phages.

139

2.10.2 Phage therapy for vibriosis in shrimp

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

#### 2.10.1 Long-term storage of phages

The usefulness of a phage lysate preparation and treatment method adopted for long-term storage of phages was elucidated in a study that demonstrated the infectivity of the phages of Vibrio spp. that remained unaffected with chloroform and DMSO treatments and storage at 40°C for 30 days [37–39, 41]. Similarly, phages were shown to be highly stable under normal storage conditions and also stable in NaCl and MgSO4 due to its stabilizing effect. Substantial amounts of viable phages were reported to occur even after storage even in distilled water. Phage isolates were found to be stable upon storage at 4°C, and a rapid loss of phage infectivity was encountered with repeated freezing and thawing at 70°C. Bacillus phage was stable to a 1-hour exposure to chloroform, indicating that it probably does not contain chloroform-soluble lipids and lipoproteins. V. vulnificus phage infectivity could not be inhibited with trypsin, protease, and ribonuclease treatments, while the infectivity of the Vibrio phages was inhibited with lysozyme and SDS treatments, perhaps demonstrating that the enzyme has interfered with the adsorbing of the phages [38, 39, 41]. The enzymatic treatments and inhibition of phage

#### Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

extracts of Bacillus subtilis BT23 established the inhibitory effects on the growth and proliferation of V. harveyi in liquid culture under aerobic conditions. The inhibitory efficacy was higher in B. subtilis BT23 cell-free extracts of 10<sup>8</sup> cfu ml<sup>1</sup> and low in

growth and proliferation of V. harveyi for 2 days, and afterward the growth and proliferation of V. harveyi was extremely inhibited when compared with the growth of V. harveyi without B. subtilis BT23. The studies on the probiotic treatment V. harveyi-infected P. monodon revealed a substantial reduction in the mortality of shrimp which were treated with B. subtilis BT23 strains under in vivo conditions. The cumulative mortality of V. harveyi post-infection and probiotic B. subtilis BT23 untreated P. monodon was 50% on the ninth day and 100% on the seventeenth day of post-infection. In contrast, in the probiotic treatment groups, the cumulative mortality of shrimp was 10% in the combined treatment after 5 days post-infection. Long-term and short-term treatments of V. harveyi-infected P. monodon with B. subtilis BT23 showed a decrease in cumulative mortality of 32 and 60%, respectively. In control groups of V. harveyi-uninfected P. monodon, there was no mortality. The growth of pathogenic V. harveyi was inhibited by nonpathogenic B. subtilis BT23 under in vivo and in vitro conditions. Co-culture experiments showed that the inhibitory activity of B. subtilis BT23 increased with increasing density of the antagonist. A high concentration of B. subtilis BT23 (antagonist) was essential to obstruct the growth and multiplication of V. harveyi in the co-culture experiments. The antagonist required being present at significantly higher levels than the pathogen, and the degree of inhibition increased with the level of antagonist. During the

. Cell-free extracts of Bacillus subtilis BT23 initially could not limit the

/10<sup>8</sup> cfu ml<sup>1</sup> was required to inhibit the growth of the pathogen

V. harveyi. Therefore, a potential probiotic co-culture must either be supplied on a regular basis or be able to colonize and multiply on or in the host. A similar control of pathogenic Vibrio in fish and shellfish, by the use of nonpathogenic bacterial strains and disease prevention, has received much attention during the last decade [42, 43, 56, 81]. Purification and characterization of the antibacterial substances from the host bacteria and the phages could help to understand the mechanism of antibacterial activity of Bacillus and other strains. Probiotic treatment offers a very promising alternative to the use of antibiotics in fish and shrimp aquaculture. Further study is needed to elucidate the exact mode of action of the observed beneficial effects of the probiotics and to understand the possibilities and limita-

The usefulness of a phage lysate preparation and treatment method adopted for long-term storage of phages was elucidated in a study that demonstrated the infectivity of the phages of Vibrio spp. that remained unaffected with chloroform and DMSO treatments and storage at 40°C for 30 days [37–39, 41]. Similarly, phages were shown to be highly stable under normal storage conditions and also stable in NaCl and MgSO4 due to its stabilizing effect. Substantial amounts of viable phages were reported to occur even after storage even in distilled water. Phage isolates were found to be stable upon storage at 4°C, and a rapid loss of phage infectivity was encountered with repeated freezing and thawing at 70°C. Bacillus phage was stable to a 1-hour exposure to chloroform, indicating that it probably does not contain chloroform-soluble lipids and lipoproteins. V. vulnificus phage infectivity could not be inhibited with trypsin, protease, and ribonuclease treatments, while the infectivity of the Vibrio phages was inhibited with lysozyme and SDS treatments, perhaps demonstrating that the enzyme has interfered with the adsorbing of

the phages [38, 39, 41]. The enzymatic treatments and inhibition of phage

10<sup>4</sup> cfu ml<sup>1</sup>

Crustacea

co-culture, 10<sup>7</sup>

138

tions of microbial control in aquaculture.

2.10.1 Long-term storage of phages

infectivity of several phages were reported. Proteinase K treatment could not alter the adsorption ability of phage particles. These studies show that binding of the phages to its host cell membrane is the first step of lytic cycle and this can be an irreversible mechanism, and a similar mechanism may exist in the infection of vibriophages as the infectivity of the phages were inhibited by lysozyme and SDS treatments. Treatment with 1% SDS did not affect the adsorption ability of phage particles. Similarly Mycoplasma arthritidis virulent 1 (MAV1) phage infectivity was reported to be unaffected by treatment with Triton X-100 and was resistant to nonionic detergents. Vibrio phages were found to be fairly resistant to chloroform [46, 101]. Further studies on the proteins and lipids of V. vulnificus phages may help us to understand their role in the life cycle and infectivity of phages. V. vulnificus phages survived 100% at pH 7 and exhibited infectivity, while none of the phages survived at extreme pH conditions (pH 3 and pH 12) [41]. V. harveyi phages were inactivated at pH 3 or less and at pH 12 or greater. In contrast, VPP97 phage was totally inactivated at pH below 5 or over 10. All V. vulnificus phages from the shrimp Penaeus monodon exhibited optimal survival at 37°C, but infectivity occurred, and plaques were observed up to a maximum temperature of 50°C [41]. JSF9 phage was shown to be stable at a temperature below 37°C, and the phages were rapidly inactivated above 50°C temperature. V. parahaemolyticus phage (VPP97) has been shown to be stable up to a temperature of 65°C and was totally inactivated at 70°C [41, 54, 58, 77, 101]. Phages were reported to survive extremes of temperature up to 95°C [54]. Phages, viz. T-ϕD0, T-ϕD2S, T-ϕHSIC, and T-ϕD1B, exhibited a latent period ranging from 90 to 180 min [77]. The results have clearly shown the physicochemical parameters are very important for the survival and infectivity of phages [37, 38, 46, 49]. Additional studies related to infectivity, stage specific expression of proteins, and specific effects of the purified phage proteins are needed to better understand their functions and applications in the control and process of infectivity of V. vulnificus phages.

#### 2.10.2 Phage therapy for vibriosis in shrimp

Phage therapy is a re-emerging field, and the bacteriophages represent potential biocontrol agents for the control of virulent and drug-resistant bacteria [19, 23–73]. However the use of phage therapy in shrimp is still in its early years, and these are highlighted especially the need for using more than one kind of bacteriophage in aquaculture to evade development of bacterial resistance [47–49, 58–60]. Phage therapy has been effectively used to protect against Vibrio diseases in a shrimp and prawn hatchery. Inhibitory effects of bacteriophages against shrimp pathogenic Vibrio spp., efficacy of potential phage cocktails against Vibrio harveyi and closely related Vibrio species isolated from shrimp, morphological characterization and biocontrol effects of Vibrio vulnificus phages against vibriosis in the shrimp, and a phage therapy in aquaculture system have been described [37–39, 41]. Four new V. vulnificus phages were detected from shrimp aquaculture system, named VV1, VV2, VV3, and VV4 [39]. All lytic V. vulnificus phages belonged to Tectiviridae family with typical double-layered elongated icosahedral head and tailless morphology [39, 101]. Lytic V. vulnificus phages which infect other Vibrio isolates were further characterized for long-term storage by enzyme treatment, organic solvent treatment, detergent treatment, pH stability, temperature stability, and agar bioassay method and one-step growth experiment. The infectivity, growth, and multiplication of VV1, VV2, VV3, and VV4 phages were unaffected by the treatment effects of chloroform, acetone, ethyl alcohol, methyl alcohol, ribonuclease (RNase), trypsin, protease, and Triton-X100. The phages (VV1–VV4) were inactivated completely with temperature (over 60°C), pH (below 3 and above 12), and

lysozyme and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) treatment. One-step growth experiments indicated a latent period of 3 h and a burst size at 37°C. Agar bioassay method indicated that the percentage inhibition of the bacteria Vibrio was 75 (VV1) and 70 (VV2, VV3, and VV4), respectively. V. vulnificus phages had a broad lytic spectrum and potential biocontrol of luminous vibriosis in the shrimp aquaculture system [39, 41, 101]. The lytic Vibrio vulnificus phages may provide a better understanding of phage-host interactions and development of phage therapy in the aquaculture system. Besides, 12 V. harveyi phages showing broad host ranges were recovered from seawater samples. Further, some of the phages of ϕH17-5c, ϕH17-7b, ϕH17-8b, and ϕH17-9b were reported to show inhibitory activity against V. harveyi based on various tests, viz. heat stability, chloroform stability, adsorption rate, and one-step growth experiment [58]. A bacteriophage of Vibrio harveyi was secluded from shrimp farm water from the West coast of India and demonstrated to exhibit a broad lytic activity against V. harveyi isolates [48, 49]. V. harveyi-infected larval shrimp exhibited a higher rate of survival in the presence of the bacteriophage than the uninfected control larval shrimp. Bacteriophage treatment of the vibriosis of shrimp in hatchery tanks enhanced the survival of the V. harveyi-infected shrimp larvae and reduced the bacterial counts [50–55, 57, 58]. Bacteriophages secluded from a shrimp hatchery and farmed P. monodon samples exhibited lytic activity against V. harveyi and also controlled the population of V. harveyi and improved the survival of Penaeus monodon larvae [41, 48–52, 58]. Purified bacteriophages exhibited lytic activity, indicating they are appropriate for phage therapy application [29, 53]. A few bacteriophages that infected V. harveyi in a shrimp hatchery were unable to control the outbreak of luminescent vibriosis disease in a shrimp culture system [75]. The potential of the bacteriophages of Vibrio harveyi was reported to control population of pathogenic Vibrio harveyi in a hatchery setting [48]. In a set of laboratory experiments, post-larval Penaeus monodon was exposed to 10<sup>6</sup> cfu ml<sup>1</sup> cells of Vibrio harveyi and was treated with 100 ppm phage which has led to a drastic reduction of Vibrio harveyi counts with 86% survival of the infected larvae, while the survival of the phage-untreated larvae was 25%. In the antibiotic (oxytetracycline 5 ppm, kanamycin 100 ppm/day)-treated hatchery tanks, an initial reduction of luminous bacterial counts was shown, and after 48 h the bacterial count increased to 10<sup>6</sup> ml<sup>1</sup> , showing the luminous vibriosis and mortality of the nauplii of Penaeus monodon with 40% larval survival. In contrast, in the bacteriophage-treated tank, the larval survival was 86%, and the survival rate in the control tank was only 17% [48]. The presence of V. mimicus (15 isolates), exhibiting a typica profile of Vibrio [49] (two isolates), was obtained from diseased tissues of penaeid shrimp. A prominent occurrence of V. harveyi, V. furnissii, V. mimicus, V. damsela, and V. anguillarum in the hatchery tank water besides MBV- and WSSVuninfected P. monodon, sea sediment, seawater, and shrimp culture pond sediment and shrimp culture pond water has been recorded [30, 53]. Vibriosis (V. alginolyticus)-associated mortality has been recorded in several invertebrates such as Penaeus monodon and Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Phage therapy has been shown to inhibit the growth and multiplication of V. harveyi, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. anguillarum. Bacteriophages belonging to Siphoviridae family are positive to control Vibrio species as the Siphoviridae phages are considered to have a specific host range consisting of species of Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Vibrio campbellii [41, 44, 46, 48–53, 58, 60, 69]. A lytic phage PW2 was obtained from shrimp pond water in Songkhla Province, Thailand, and the morphological characteristics of the phage consisted of an icosahedral head and a long noncontractile tail categorized under the order Caudovirales and family of Siphoviridae. The phage PW2 showed lytic properties against Vibrio harveyi [52]. Most of the Vibrio harveyi phages were found to be siphophages [25, 26, 29, 41, 51]. However, Vibrio harveyi

phages which were from other families such as Myoviridae and Podoviridae were also reported [41, 51]. Selection of a suitable bacteriophage or a cocktail of phages is the key issue in the success of phage therapy of Vibrio species. Moreover phage cocktails have been demonstrated to be more effective than individual phages in treatment of Vibrio infection. By making a phage cocktail, it would become easier to treat a wide range of drug-resistant bacterial infections [58, 68]. Moreover phageresistant mutants are exceptional, and hence the use of a multiphage therapy might decrease the resistance mechanism [61–65, 81, 82]. The limitations of the use of bacteriophages have been recognized, and the phages cannot be used if they (1) have toxin gene insertion; (2) have endotoxin release due to their lytic effect on the host bacterial cells; (3) have a risk of genetic material exchange, i.e., transduction or phage conversion; (4) have propagation and continuous maintenance; (5) have development of anti-bacteriophage bodies against them; (6) have the cost temperate phages contributing to bacterial virulence; (7) have emergence of phageresistant bacteria; (8) have disease outbreak of unknown bacteria when phage specificity is a problem; and (9) are continuously removed by the immune system [80–82]. Vibriophages themselves may have some protective effects though they can be candidates as therapeutic agents in bacterial infections in the aquaculture system, and therefore there is a need to be further investigating them in their natural environment. Future work may involve obtaining consistent credible results which can substantiate the application of bacteriophages to control vibriosis in shrimp and extending such research to other organisms. The usefulness of phage therapy to control microbial infections that occur in dissimilar organisms at various stages of from eggs to brood stock, as well as in laboratory, tanks, or field applications, was shown in experiments made with shrimp larvae, showing a promising potential for phage therapy [46]. The life-saving antibiotics and the new-generation antibiotics cannot be used in aquaculture, and therefore the bacteriophages have the natural advantages and potential to be used in management of the vibriosis in aquaculture.

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

Significant (71%) mortalities of larval, post-larval, and adult lobsters were caused by shell diseases where Vibrio spp., besides Pseudomonas, and Aeromonas have also been isolated. A strain of Vibrio owensii (DY05) was isolated from an epizootic in aquaculture-reared larval phyllosomas of the ornate spiny lobster Panulirus ornatus [10–12, 55]. Bacteriophage therapy was one of the techniques that controlled and removed the pathogenic Vibrio spp. from the larval cultures of the tropical rock lobster, Panulirus ornatus. V. harveyi has been found to be associated

Crothers-Stomps and colleagues [55] demonstrated that from eight bacteriophages (six phages belonged to the family Siphoviridae, and two belonged to the family Myoviridae), only one bacteriophage from the family Siphoviridae was shown to exhibit a clear lytic activity against V. harveyi with no apparent transducing properties. They have identified the occurrence of phage resistance as a major constraint to the use of phage therapy in aquacultures as the pathogenic bacteria were not completely eliminated [29, 41], and a similar approach on other phages is essential for understanding of the mechanism of development of phage resistance.

Bacterial and fungal diseases are accountable for the high mortality and profound economic loss encountered in the giant freshwater prawn M. rosenbergii aquaculture industry [19–21]. Vibriosis (V. alginolyticus)-associated mortality was

2.10.3 Phage therapy in lobsters

with diseases in spiny lobster [55].

141

2.10.4 Diseases of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (DeMan)

#### Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

lysozyme and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) treatment. One-step growth experiments indicated a latent period of 3 h and a burst size at 37°C. Agar bioassay method indicated that the percentage inhibition of the bacteria Vibrio was 75 (VV1) and 70 (VV2, VV3, and VV4), respectively. V. vulnificus phages had a broad lytic spectrum and potential biocontrol of luminous vibriosis in the shrimp aquaculture system [39, 41, 101]. The lytic Vibrio vulnificus phages may provide a better understanding of phage-host interactions and development of phage therapy in the aquaculture system. Besides, 12 V. harveyi phages showing broad host ranges were recovered from seawater samples. Further, some of the phages of ϕH17-5c, ϕH17-7b, ϕH17-8b, and ϕH17-9b were reported to show inhibitory activity against V. harveyi based on various tests, viz. heat stability, chloroform stability, adsorption rate, and one-step growth experiment [58]. A bacteriophage of Vibrio harveyi was secluded from shrimp farm water from the West coast of India and demonstrated to exhibit a broad lytic activity against V. harveyi isolates [48, 49]. V. harveyi-infected larval shrimp exhibited a higher rate of survival in the presence of the bacteriophage than the uninfected control larval shrimp. Bacteriophage treatment of the vibriosis of shrimp in hatchery tanks enhanced the survival of the V. harveyi-infected shrimp larvae and reduced the bacterial counts [50–55, 57, 58]. Bacteriophages secluded from a shrimp hatchery and farmed P. monodon samples exhibited lytic activity against V. harveyi and also controlled the population of V. harveyi and improved the

survival of Penaeus monodon larvae [41, 48–52, 58]. Purified bacteriophages exhibited lytic activity, indicating they are appropriate for phage therapy application [29, 53]. A few bacteriophages that infected V. harveyi in a shrimp hatchery were unable to control the outbreak of luminescent vibriosis disease in a shrimp culture system [75]. The potential of the bacteriophages of Vibrio harveyi was reported to control population of pathogenic Vibrio harveyi in a hatchery setting [48]. In a set of laboratory experiments, post-larval Penaeus monodon was exposed to 10<sup>6</sup> cfu ml<sup>1</sup> cells of Vibrio harveyi and was treated with 100 ppm phage which has led to a drastic reduction of Vibrio harveyi counts with 86% survival of the infected larvae, while the survival of the phage-untreated larvae was 25%. In the antibiotic (oxytetracycline 5 ppm, kanamycin 100 ppm/day)-treated hatchery tanks, an initial reduction of luminous bacterial counts was shown, and after 48 h the bacterial

nauplii of Penaeus monodon with 40% larval survival. In contrast, in the

and shrimp culture pond water has been recorded [30, 53]. Vibriosis (V.

consisting of species of Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Vibrio campbellii [41, 44, 46, 48–53, 58, 60, 69]. A lytic phage PW2 was obtained from shrimp pond water in Songkhla Province, Thailand, and the morphological characteristics of the phage consisted of an icosahedral head and a long noncontractile tail categorized under the order Caudovirales and family of Siphoviridae. The phage PW2 showed lytic properties against Vibrio harveyi [52]. Most of the Vibrio harveyi phages were found to be siphophages [25, 26, 29, 41, 51]. However, Vibrio harveyi

bacteriophage-treated tank, the larval survival was 86%, and the survival rate in the control tank was only 17% [48]. The presence of V. mimicus (15 isolates), exhibiting a typica profile of Vibrio [49] (two isolates), was obtained from diseased tissues of penaeid shrimp. A prominent occurrence of V. harveyi, V. furnissii, V. mimicus, V. damsela, and V. anguillarum in the hatchery tank water besides MBV- and WSSVuninfected P. monodon, sea sediment, seawater, and shrimp culture pond sediment

alginolyticus)-associated mortality has been recorded in several invertebrates such as Penaeus monodon and Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Phage therapy has been shown to inhibit the growth and multiplication of V. harveyi, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. anguillarum. Bacteriophages belonging to Siphoviridae family are positive to control Vibrio species as the Siphoviridae phages are considered to have a specific host range

, showing the luminous vibriosis and mortality of the

count increased to 10<sup>6</sup> ml<sup>1</sup>

Crustacea

140

phages which were from other families such as Myoviridae and Podoviridae were also reported [41, 51]. Selection of a suitable bacteriophage or a cocktail of phages is the key issue in the success of phage therapy of Vibrio species. Moreover phage cocktails have been demonstrated to be more effective than individual phages in treatment of Vibrio infection. By making a phage cocktail, it would become easier to treat a wide range of drug-resistant bacterial infections [58, 68]. Moreover phageresistant mutants are exceptional, and hence the use of a multiphage therapy might decrease the resistance mechanism [61–65, 81, 82]. The limitations of the use of bacteriophages have been recognized, and the phages cannot be used if they (1) have toxin gene insertion; (2) have endotoxin release due to their lytic effect on the host bacterial cells; (3) have a risk of genetic material exchange, i.e., transduction or phage conversion; (4) have propagation and continuous maintenance; (5) have development of anti-bacteriophage bodies against them; (6) have the cost temperate phages contributing to bacterial virulence; (7) have emergence of phageresistant bacteria; (8) have disease outbreak of unknown bacteria when phage specificity is a problem; and (9) are continuously removed by the immune system [80–82]. Vibriophages themselves may have some protective effects though they can be candidates as therapeutic agents in bacterial infections in the aquaculture system, and therefore there is a need to be further investigating them in their natural environment. Future work may involve obtaining consistent credible results which can substantiate the application of bacteriophages to control vibriosis in shrimp and extending such research to other organisms. The usefulness of phage therapy to control microbial infections that occur in dissimilar organisms at various stages of from eggs to brood stock, as well as in laboratory, tanks, or field applications, was shown in experiments made with shrimp larvae, showing a promising potential for phage therapy [46]. The life-saving antibiotics and the new-generation antibiotics cannot be used in aquaculture, and therefore the bacteriophages have the natural advantages and potential to be used in management of the vibriosis in aquaculture.

#### 2.10.3 Phage therapy in lobsters

Significant (71%) mortalities of larval, post-larval, and adult lobsters were caused by shell diseases where Vibrio spp., besides Pseudomonas, and Aeromonas have also been isolated. A strain of Vibrio owensii (DY05) was isolated from an epizootic in aquaculture-reared larval phyllosomas of the ornate spiny lobster Panulirus ornatus [10–12, 55]. Bacteriophage therapy was one of the techniques that controlled and removed the pathogenic Vibrio spp. from the larval cultures of the tropical rock lobster, Panulirus ornatus. V. harveyi has been found to be associated with diseases in spiny lobster [55].

Crothers-Stomps and colleagues [55] demonstrated that from eight bacteriophages (six phages belonged to the family Siphoviridae, and two belonged to the family Myoviridae), only one bacteriophage from the family Siphoviridae was shown to exhibit a clear lytic activity against V. harveyi with no apparent transducing properties. They have identified the occurrence of phage resistance as a major constraint to the use of phage therapy in aquacultures as the pathogenic bacteria were not completely eliminated [29, 41], and a similar approach on other phages is essential for understanding of the mechanism of development of phage resistance.

#### 2.10.4 Diseases of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (DeMan)

Bacterial and fungal diseases are accountable for the high mortality and profound economic loss encountered in the giant freshwater prawn M. rosenbergii aquaculture industry [19–21]. Vibriosis (V. alginolyticus)-associated mortality was recorded in M. rosenbergii [19–21]. They have shown the occurrence of a very high load of total heterotrophic bacterial count and a total presumptive Vibrio count in the 11 different larval stages of M. rosenbergii, whereas the total heterotrophic bacterial count was higher in the larval tank water throughout the cycle of the M. rosenbergii larval culture. The control treatment methods for the vibriosis consisted of chlorination, application of antibiotics, UV radiation alone, and a combination of sequential treatments starting from chlorination (2 ppm) followed by sand filtration, dechlorination, UV radiation (10 s) and microfiltration (5 μm size), and the sequential treatments in M. rosenbergii, and these had resulted in the gradual reduction of V. alginolyticus counts, and these were shown to be the best methods to control the pathogenic bacterial population in hatcheries of freshwater prawn M. rosenbergii. Antimicrobial resistance profile of Vibrio species isolated from the hatchery system of M. rosenbergii has been reported [19–21]. Vibriosis of M. rosenbergii can be controlled through phages φSt2 and φGrn1 of V. alginolyticus from live feed A. salina [97–99].

prevailing member of the cultivable bacterial community of Artemia. There are a number of studies indicative that Artemia nauplii are vectors of potentially harmful bacteria such as Vibrio spp. Goulden et al. [12] reported that Vibrio owensii (DY05) infected Artemia (brine shrimp) was responsible for 84–89% mortality of the aquacultured larval phyllosomas of the ornate spiny lobster Panulirus ornatus, and an understanding of the infection processes can help to improve targeted biocontrol strategies. The existing disinfection techniques such as filters, chlorination, ozone, UV, etc. could not prevent the occurrence of bacterial pathogens in the hatcheries and may perhaps help in the growth, proliferation, and multiplication of the opportunistic pathogen application of broad-spectrum antibiotics in the feed and hatchery water which has been the most natural strategy to control bacterial infections. The practice of applying antibiotics in aquaculture has become unattractive as many important bacterial pathogens belonging to the genera Aeromonas and Vibrio evolve antibiotic resistance. The excessive and indiscriminate use of antibiotics has resulted in the development of multidrug-resistant bacterial strains and public health problems. In shrimp hatcheries, the use of bacteriophages that infect bacteria is an alternative method to selectively eliminate their bacterial hosts while leaving normal microbiome unaltered. Phage therapy has been shown to inhibit the growth and multiplication of V. harveyi, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. anguillarum

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

2.10.7 In vitro lytic effect of phages φSt2 and φGrn1 on Vibrio strains of Artemia salina

In vitro cell lysis experiment of phage (a) φSt2 and (b) φGrn1 was carried by infecting the fresh cultures of the host bacteria V. alginolyticus strain V1 which was collected from live feed A. salina culture [97–99]. The lysis of the host bacteria V. alginolyticus strain V1 grown in TCBS was proportional to the multiplicity of infection (MOI) (which is defined as the ratio between the number of viruses in an infection and the number of the host cells which can be resolved by correcting the relative concentration of virus and host) used. The lowest (MOI = 1) showed no effect, while the highest (MOI = 100) showed a complete inhibition of bacterial growth. The phages were also tested in vitro against 12 different bacterial isolates grown in TCBS which originated from live feed A. salina culture. A phage mixture of φSt2 and φGrn1 at MOI = 100 was shown to affect the growth of all 12 bacterial strains tested, and the study showed that in all cases, there was a delay in the exponential phase, and even when the cultures reached a plateau of growth, the density of phage-treated bacteria was lower than their corresponding controls.

The effect of the phage mixture (φSt2 and φGrn1 at MOI = 100) was examined by administrating the phages in vivo in the live prey cultures of A. salina. After 4 h of administration of the phage mixture, Vibrio count was not altered in the phageuntreated control cultures, while the Vibrio count drastically reduced in the phagetreated cultures of A. salina [97]. The total Vibrio counts in the phage-treated

that of the initial total Vibrio counts. The φSt2 and φGrn1 phages affected the growth of a range of Vibrio spp. and exhibited lytic activity in eight different V. alginolyticus strains [97]. The phages also exhibited infection in 10 out of the 25 Vibrio strains (40%) tested and lysis in bacterial strains such as V. harveyi and V. parahaemolyticus species and were known to affect the growth of several strains of bacteria V. harveyi strains isolated from an Artemia live feed organism. A broad host range of φSt2 and φGrn1 phages indicated the occurrences of a very similar host

, which was 93% lesser than

2.10.8 In vivo efficacy of phages on the vibriosis of A. salina culture

cultures of A. salina was 5.3 103 3.1 <sup>10</sup><sup>3</sup> cfu ml<sup>1</sup>

[39, 97–99].

143

#### 2.10.5 Diseases of crabs

Shell diseases are caused by chitinolytic bacteria which were encountered in English prawn Palaemon serratus; American lobsters Homarus americanus; penaeid shrimp; and king crabs, Paralithodes camtschaticus and Paralithodes platypus; and the tanner crabs Chionoecetes tanneri are affected by rust diseases caused by chitindestroying bacteria [7]. Biocontrol method against the infection of V. anguillarum for rearing the swimming crab larvae Portunus trituberculatus in the aquaculture water has been described [94–96]. A bacterial strain PM-4 Thalassobacter utilis isolated from a crustacean culturing pond was shown to inhibit the growth of pathogenic Vibrio anguillarum in seawater and to improve the growth of larval crab. The cells of the bacterial strain PM-4 T. utilis were cultured in a large quantity and were added daily for 6<sup>3</sup> of seawater used for culturing larval crab Portunus trituberculatus. Initial V. anguillarum bacterial density in the crustacean culture water was 106 cells ml<sup>1</sup> , while at the crab larval growth stage zoea II, the bacterial density was found to increase to more than 10<sup>7</sup> cells ml<sup>1</sup> and reduced the pathogenic V. anguillarum bacteria to 10<sup>6</sup> cells ml<sup>1</sup> . When the bacterial strain PM-4 Thalassobacter utilis dominated the bacterial populations, the numbers of pathogenic bacteria Vibrio spp. were reduced or could not be detectable in seawater. The growth and production of the larval crab P. trituberculatus were found to be increased by the addition of the bacterial strain PM-4 to the culture water. Investigations on the bacteriophages and phage therapy specific for aquaculture of crabs are desirable.

#### 2.10.6 Phage therapy for vibriosis of Artemia salina

The occurrences of V. harveyi, V. furnissii, V. mimicus, V. damsela, and V. anguillarum in the nauplii of Artemia and the presence of V. harveyi and V. mimicus in the Artemia-reared water have been recorded [12, 18, 22, 39]. A prominent occurrence of Vibrio in the Artemia nauplii, Artemia-reared water, egg samples, hatchery tank water besides MBV- and WSSV-uninfected P. monodon, sea sediment, seawater, and shrimp culture pond sediment and shrimp culture pond water was recorded. Vibriosis (V. alginolyticus)-associated mortality has been recorded in several invertebrates such as Penaeus monodon and Macrobrachium rosenbergii [18–21, 34, 97–99]. Vibrio species normally reside in the live feed organism such as Artemia salina which serves as means of carrying and establishing the bacteria into the hatchery and aquaculture system where V. alginolyticus has been reported as the

#### Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

recorded in M. rosenbergii [19–21]. They have shown the occurrence of a very high load of total heterotrophic bacterial count and a total presumptive Vibrio count in the 11 different larval stages of M. rosenbergii, whereas the total heterotrophic bacterial count was higher in the larval tank water throughout the cycle of the M. rosenbergii larval culture. The control treatment methods for the vibriosis consisted of chlorination, application of antibiotics, UV radiation alone, and a combination of sequential treatments starting from chlorination (2 ppm) followed by sand filtration, dechlorination, UV radiation (10 s) and microfiltration (5 μm size), and the sequential treatments in M. rosenbergii, and these had resulted in the gradual reduction of V. alginolyticus counts, and these were shown to be the best methods to control the pathogenic bacterial population in hatcheries of freshwater prawn M. rosenbergii. Antimicrobial resistance profile of Vibrio species isolated from the hatchery system of M. rosenbergii has been reported [19–21]. Vibriosis of M.

rosenbergii can be controlled through phages φSt2 and φGrn1 of V. alginolyticus from

Shell diseases are caused by chitinolytic bacteria which were encountered in English prawn Palaemon serratus; American lobsters Homarus americanus; penaeid shrimp; and king crabs, Paralithodes camtschaticus and Paralithodes platypus; and the tanner crabs Chionoecetes tanneri are affected by rust diseases caused by chitindestroying bacteria [7]. Biocontrol method against the infection of V. anguillarum for rearing the swimming crab larvae Portunus trituberculatus in the aquaculture water has been described [94–96]. A bacterial strain PM-4 Thalassobacter utilis isolated from a crustacean culturing pond was shown to inhibit the growth of pathogenic Vibrio anguillarum in seawater and to improve the growth of larval crab. The cells of the bacterial strain PM-4 T. utilis were cultured in a large quantity and

were added daily for 6<sup>3</sup> of seawater used for culturing larval crab Portunus trituberculatus. Initial V. anguillarum bacterial density in the crustacean culture

density was found to increase to more than 10<sup>7</sup> cells ml<sup>1</sup> and reduced the patho-

Thalassobacter utilis dominated the bacterial populations, the numbers of pathogenic bacteria Vibrio spp. were reduced or could not be detectable in seawater. The growth and production of the larval crab P. trituberculatus were found to be increased by the addition of the bacterial strain PM-4 to the culture water. Investigations on the bacteriophages and phage therapy specific for aquaculture of crabs

The occurrences of V. harveyi, V. furnissii, V. mimicus, V. damsela, and V. anguillarum in the nauplii of Artemia and the presence of V. harveyi and V. mimicus in the Artemia-reared water have been recorded [12, 18, 22, 39]. A prominent occurrence of Vibrio in the Artemia nauplii, Artemia-reared water, egg samples, hatchery tank water besides MBV- and WSSV-uninfected P. monodon, sea sediment, seawater, and shrimp culture pond sediment and shrimp culture pond water was recorded. Vibriosis (V. alginolyticus)-associated mortality has been recorded in several invertebrates such as Penaeus monodon and Macrobrachium rosenbergii [18–21, 34, 97–99]. Vibrio species normally reside in the live feed organism such as Artemia salina which serves as means of carrying and establishing the bacteria into the hatchery and aquaculture system where V. alginolyticus has been reported as the

, while at the crab larval growth stage zoea II, the bacterial

. When the bacterial strain PM-4

live feed A. salina [97–99].

2.10.5 Diseases of crabs

Crustacea

water was 106 cells ml<sup>1</sup>

are desirable.

142

genic V. anguillarum bacteria to 10<sup>6</sup> cells ml<sup>1</sup>

2.10.6 Phage therapy for vibriosis of Artemia salina

prevailing member of the cultivable bacterial community of Artemia. There are a number of studies indicative that Artemia nauplii are vectors of potentially harmful bacteria such as Vibrio spp. Goulden et al. [12] reported that Vibrio owensii (DY05) infected Artemia (brine shrimp) was responsible for 84–89% mortality of the aquacultured larval phyllosomas of the ornate spiny lobster Panulirus ornatus, and an understanding of the infection processes can help to improve targeted biocontrol strategies. The existing disinfection techniques such as filters, chlorination, ozone, UV, etc. could not prevent the occurrence of bacterial pathogens in the hatcheries and may perhaps help in the growth, proliferation, and multiplication of the opportunistic pathogen application of broad-spectrum antibiotics in the feed and hatchery water which has been the most natural strategy to control bacterial infections. The practice of applying antibiotics in aquaculture has become unattractive as many important bacterial pathogens belonging to the genera Aeromonas and Vibrio evolve antibiotic resistance. The excessive and indiscriminate use of antibiotics has resulted in the development of multidrug-resistant bacterial strains and public health problems. In shrimp hatcheries, the use of bacteriophages that infect bacteria is an alternative method to selectively eliminate their bacterial hosts while leaving normal microbiome unaltered. Phage therapy has been shown to inhibit the growth and multiplication of V. harveyi, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. anguillarum [39, 97–99].

#### 2.10.7 In vitro lytic effect of phages φSt2 and φGrn1 on Vibrio strains of Artemia salina

In vitro cell lysis experiment of phage (a) φSt2 and (b) φGrn1 was carried by infecting the fresh cultures of the host bacteria V. alginolyticus strain V1 which was collected from live feed A. salina culture [97–99]. The lysis of the host bacteria V. alginolyticus strain V1 grown in TCBS was proportional to the multiplicity of infection (MOI) (which is defined as the ratio between the number of viruses in an infection and the number of the host cells which can be resolved by correcting the relative concentration of virus and host) used. The lowest (MOI = 1) showed no effect, while the highest (MOI = 100) showed a complete inhibition of bacterial growth. The phages were also tested in vitro against 12 different bacterial isolates grown in TCBS which originated from live feed A. salina culture. A phage mixture of φSt2 and φGrn1 at MOI = 100 was shown to affect the growth of all 12 bacterial strains tested, and the study showed that in all cases, there was a delay in the exponential phase, and even when the cultures reached a plateau of growth, the density of phage-treated bacteria was lower than their corresponding controls.

#### 2.10.8 In vivo efficacy of phages on the vibriosis of A. salina culture

The effect of the phage mixture (φSt2 and φGrn1 at MOI = 100) was examined by administrating the phages in vivo in the live prey cultures of A. salina. After 4 h of administration of the phage mixture, Vibrio count was not altered in the phageuntreated control cultures, while the Vibrio count drastically reduced in the phagetreated cultures of A. salina [97]. The total Vibrio counts in the phage-treated cultures of A. salina was 5.3 103 3.1 <sup>10</sup><sup>3</sup> cfu ml<sup>1</sup> , which was 93% lesser than that of the initial total Vibrio counts. The φSt2 and φGrn1 phages affected the growth of a range of Vibrio spp. and exhibited lytic activity in eight different V. alginolyticus strains [97]. The phages also exhibited infection in 10 out of the 25 Vibrio strains (40%) tested and lysis in bacterial strains such as V. harveyi and V. parahaemolyticus species and were known to affect the growth of several strains of bacteria V. harveyi strains isolated from an Artemia live feed organism. A broad host range of φSt2 and φGrn1 phages indicated the occurrences of a very similar host

structures as receptors, viz. LPS phage receptors on the outer membrane of many of Gram-negative bacteria and the genetic similarity contributing to this broad lytic spectrum of the phages φSt2 and φGrn1 phages which exhibited a strong lytic effect against V. alginolyticus-type strain DSM 2171 [98]. The bacteriophages, φSt2 and φGrn1, are having a broad host range, and such biological attributes make them the potential candidates for phage therapy application, and these advocate that phage therapy can be an alternative to antibiotics in aquaculture. The phages, viz. φSt2 and φGrn1 and a giant bacteriophage pVa-21, can effectively be used in the biological control of pathogenic Vibrio species in marine hatcheries [97–99]. These studies indicate the potential applications of the phages for various purposes outside aquaculture, and further research on the specificity, phage-host interactions, proteomics, and genomics of phages are needed to establish their usefulness and utilization. Efficacy of phage therapy was shown to prevent mortality of the vibriosis-infected brine shrimp Artemia franciscana [97–99]. Application of single-type/ cocktails of phages against V. parahaemolyticus- and V. harveyi-infected cysts and nauplii Artemia franciscana showed a drastic improvement in the survival rate (from 85 to 89%) and hatching success (100% in both cases) in groups treated with phages, whereas the control groups exhibited a survival rate of 40–50% and hatching success (50%). These studies indicate that the phage cocktails offer an alternative to chemotherapeutic agents and can be used in brine shrimp production.

carried out on the intricacies of phage lifestyles and their dynamics in natural systems, genome and viriomes, proteome analysis, genes coding for their proteins, and DNA polymerase phylogeny, which can help us in identifying novel methods of phage-host interaction and in understanding the way in which phages control their hosts. The use of probiotic organisms and phage therapy in crustacean aquaculture is found to be safe for the consumer of shrimp, and therefore a scientific rational approach is needed to evolve guidelines for phage therapy/probiotic applications in

The author (PR) is thankful to Ms. Keerthana and Mrs. Rekha for their assistance and help in the work. The author acknowledges support from Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital for providing research facilities and encouragement for tech-

The author declares that there is no financial or conflict of interests.

Research and Development Wing, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital,

\*Address all correspondence to: researchsbmch@gmail.com;

Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research (BIHER), Chennai, Tamilnadu,

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,

The author (Dr P. Ramasamy) has made a significant contribution to the conception, design, and execution of the reported study and drafted the manuscript

aquaculture and for their use and safety.

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

nical assistance to complete the work.

Acknowledgements

Conflict of interest

Author's contribution

writing and discussion.

Author details

India

145

Palaniappan Ramasamy

ramasamypalaniappan@hotmail.com

provided the original work is properly cited.

#### 3. Conclusions

The callous use of antibiotics against bacterial diseases in the culture of crustaceans in the aquatic system has led to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections which can be a serious threat to all life forms and public health, and the phage therapy may help to overcome such complex problems. Control of bacterial diseases in the future may depend on development of novel drugs, innovative approaches, and management practices to minimize the risk of introduction of infectious agents into aquaculture systems and to reduce predisposing factors. The occurrences of lytic bacteriophages of Bacillus spp./Vibrio spp. as well as their efficacy were established. Phage therapy has been shown to inhibit the growth and multiplication of many different pathogenic bacteria, viz. V. harveyi, V. parahaemolyticus, V. alginolyticus, V. furnissii, V. mimicus, V. damsel, and V. anguillarum, and promote better survival and production of the crustaceans in aquaculture. Infected live feed Artemia is responsible for the establishment of the bacterial infections in the hatchery and aquaculture system causing mass mortality of the larval crustaceans in culture, and such bacterial infections can be controlled through lytic phages, viz. ϕH17-5c, ϕH17-7b, ϕH17-8b, and ϕH17-9b from V. harveyi; phages VV1, VV2, VV3, and VV4 from V. vulnificus; and φSt2 and φGrn1 of V. alginolyticus of A. salina. However development of specific cocktails of phage therapy for aquaculture of crabs, prawns, lobsters, and crabs is desirable. The phage therapy is an ideal method for the control of microbial infections that occur in dissimilar organisms at various stages from eggs to brood stock as well as in laboratory, tanks, or field applications, and extending such research to other organisms could be one of the valuable strategies, to provide evidences and validate the usefulness and therapeutic potential of the phage therapy. An understanding of the infection processes, phage resistance, the efficacy of phage therapy on the targeted pathogens, and their impact on the normal microbiome can help to improve biocontrol strategies. The potential applications of the phages for various purposes outside aquaculture and further research on the specificity and phage-host interactions are needed to establish their usefulness and exploitation. Future work may be

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

carried out on the intricacies of phage lifestyles and their dynamics in natural systems, genome and viriomes, proteome analysis, genes coding for their proteins, and DNA polymerase phylogeny, which can help us in identifying novel methods of phage-host interaction and in understanding the way in which phages control their hosts. The use of probiotic organisms and phage therapy in crustacean aquaculture is found to be safe for the consumer of shrimp, and therefore a scientific rational approach is needed to evolve guidelines for phage therapy/probiotic applications in aquaculture and for their use and safety.

#### Acknowledgements

structures as receptors, viz. LPS phage receptors on the outer membrane of many of Gram-negative bacteria and the genetic similarity contributing to this broad lytic spectrum of the phages φSt2 and φGrn1 phages which exhibited a strong lytic effect against V. alginolyticus-type strain DSM 2171 [98]. The bacteriophages, φSt2 and φGrn1, are having a broad host range, and such biological attributes make them the potential candidates for phage therapy application, and these advocate that phage therapy can be an alternative to antibiotics in aquaculture. The phages, viz. φSt2 and φGrn1 and a giant bacteriophage pVa-21, can effectively be used in the biological control of pathogenic Vibrio species in marine hatcheries [97–99]. These studies indicate the potential applications of the phages for various purposes outside aquaculture, and further research on the specificity, phage-host interactions, proteomics, and genomics of phages are needed to establish their usefulness and

utilization. Efficacy of phage therapy was shown to prevent mortality of the vibriosis-infected brine shrimp Artemia franciscana [97–99]. Application of single-type/ cocktails of phages against V. parahaemolyticus- and V. harveyi-infected cysts and nauplii Artemia franciscana showed a drastic improvement in the survival rate (from 85 to 89%) and hatching success (100% in both cases) in groups treated with phages, whereas the control groups exhibited a survival rate of 40–50% and hatching success (50%). These studies indicate that the phage cocktails offer an alternative to chemotherapeutic agents and can be used in brine shrimp production.

The callous use of antibiotics against bacterial diseases in the culture of crustaceans in the aquatic system has led to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections which can be a serious threat to all life forms and public health, and the phage therapy may help to overcome such complex problems. Control of bacterial diseases in the future may depend on development of novel drugs, innovative approaches, and management practices to minimize the risk of introduction of infectious agents into aquaculture systems and to reduce predisposing factors. The occurrences of lytic bacteriophages of Bacillus spp./Vibrio spp. as well as their efficacy were established. Phage therapy has been shown to inhibit the growth and

multiplication of many different pathogenic bacteria, viz. V. harveyi, V. parahaemolyticus, V. alginolyticus, V. furnissii, V. mimicus, V. damsel, and V. anguillarum, and promote better survival and production of the crustaceans in aquaculture. Infected live feed Artemia is responsible for the establishment of the bacterial infections in the hatchery and aquaculture system causing mass mortality of the larval crustaceans in culture, and such bacterial infections can be controlled through lytic phages, viz. ϕH17-5c, ϕH17-7b, ϕH17-8b, and ϕH17-9b from V. harveyi; phages VV1, VV2, VV3, and VV4 from V. vulnificus; and φSt2 and φGrn1 of V. alginolyticus of A. salina. However development of specific cocktails of phage therapy for aquaculture of crabs, prawns, lobsters, and crabs is desirable. The phage therapy is an ideal method for the control of microbial infections that occur in dissimilar organisms at various stages from eggs to brood stock as well as in laboratory, tanks, or field applications, and extending such research to other organisms could be one of the valuable strategies, to provide evidences and validate the usefulness and therapeutic potential of the phage therapy. An understanding of the infection processes, phage resistance, the efficacy of phage therapy on the targeted pathogens, and their impact on the normal microbiome can help to improve biocontrol strategies. The potential applications of the phages for various purposes outside aquaculture and further research on the specificity and phage-host interactions are needed to establish their usefulness and exploitation. Future work may be

3. Conclusions

Crustacea

144

The author (PR) is thankful to Ms. Keerthana and Mrs. Rekha for their assistance and help in the work. The author acknowledges support from Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital for providing research facilities and encouragement for technical assistance to complete the work.

#### Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no financial or conflict of interests.

#### Author's contribution

The author (Dr P. Ramasamy) has made a significant contribution to the conception, design, and execution of the reported study and drafted the manuscript writing and discussion.

#### Author details

Palaniappan Ramasamy Research and Development Wing, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research (BIHER), Chennai, Tamilnadu, India

\*Address all correspondence to: researchsbmch@gmail.com; ramasamypalaniappan@hotmail.com

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### References

[1] FAO. The state of world aquaculture. Fisheries Technical Paper; 500, 2006

[2] FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture—2008; 2009

[3] The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. FAO's Official World Fishery and Aquaculture; 2018

[4] The shrimp panel at the National Fishery Institute's. In: Global Seafood Market Conference (GSMC); Miami, Florida, USA; 21-25 January 2018. 2018

[5] Lundin GG. Fish health quarantine. In: The World Bank Report. Global Attempts to Address Shrimp Disease. Marine/Environmental Paper 4. 1996. p. 45

[6] Stentiford G, Sritunyalucksana K, Flegel TW, Williams BAP. New paradigms to help solve the global aquaculture disease crisis. PLoS Pathogens. 2017;13:2

[7] Sindermann CJ. Principal Diseases of Marine Fish and Shellfish. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. United Kingdom, London: Academic Press; 1990

[8] Baross JA, Tester PA, Morita RY. Incidence, microscopy, and etiology of exoskeleton lesions in the tanner crab, Chionoecetes tanneri. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. 1978;35:1141-1149

[9] Taylor CC. Shell disease as a mortality factor in the lobster (Homarus americanus). Fish Circ. Maine, Dep. Sea Shore Fish; 1948. pp. 41-48

[10] Malloy SC. Bacteria induced shell disease of lobsters (Homarus americanus). Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 1978;14:2-10

[11] Roald SO, Aursjø J, Hästein T. Occurrence of shell disease in lobsters, Homarus gammarus in the southern part of the OsloFjord. Norway: FiskeriDirektoratets Skrifter Serie HavUndersokelser; 1981;17:153-160 during the naupliar development of Artemiafranciscana. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 2012;

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

> [27] Heldal M, Bratbak G. Production and decay of viruses in aquatic

Series. 1991;72:205-212

2002;153(1):13-18

2004;2(2):166-173

marine planktonic systems. Oceanography. 1993;6:51-63

environments. Marine Ecology Progress

[28] Fuhrman JA, Suttle CA. Viruses in

[29] Nakai T, Park SC. Bacteriophage therapy of infectious diseases in aquaculture. Research in Microbiology.

[30] Withey S, Cartmell E, Avery LM, et al. Bacteriophages—Potential for application in wastewater treatment processes. Science of the Total Environment. 2005;339(1-3):1-18

[31] Levin BR, Bull JJ. Population and evolutionary dynamics of phage

[32] Chanishvili N. Phage therapy— History from twort and D'Herelle through soviet experience to current approaches. Advances in Virus

Research. 2012;83:4-40. DOI: 10.1016/

[33] D'Hérelle F. Surun microbe invisible antagoniste des Bacillus dysentérique. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences-Series D. 1917;165:373-375

B978-0-12-394438-2.00001-3

[34] Sulakvelidze A, Kutter E.

2005. pp. 381-436

6578-6583

Bacteriophage therapy in humans. In: Kutter E, Sulakvelidze A, editors. Bacteriophages: Biology and

Application. Boca Raton: CRC Press;

[35] Whitman WB et al. Prokaryotes: The unseen majority. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1998;95:

[36] Ramasamy P, Brennan GP. Phage therapy in aquaculture system. In: Trends in Biotechnology. India: University of Madras, Publication

Division; 2002. pp. 53-60

therapy. Nature Reviews. Microbiology.

[19] Krishnika A, Ramasamy P. Antimicrobial resistance profile of Vibrio species isolated from the hatchery system of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Deman). Indian Journal of

Fisheries. 2014;60(4):147-152

[21] Krishnika A, Ramasamy P. Lagenidium sp infection in the larval stages of the fresh water prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (DeMan). Indian Journal of Fisheries. 2014;61(2):

[22] Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I, Umesha RK. Microbial diseases in shrimp aquaculture. In: Ramaiah N, editor. Marine Microbiology: Facets and Opportunities. Goa: National Institute of Oceanography; 2000. pp. 121-134

[23] Nakai T, Sugimoto R, Park K-H, et al. Protective effects of bacteriophage on experimental Lactococcus garvieae infection in yellowtail. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 1999;37:33-41

[24] Børsheim KY. Native marine bacteriophages. FEMS Microbiology

[26] Marks T, Sharp R. Review: Bacteriophages and biotechnology: A review. Journal of Chemical Technology

and Biotechnology. 2000;75:6-17

147

[25] Thiel K. Old dogma, new tricks— 21st century phage therapy. Nature Biotechnology. 2004;1:31-36

Ecology. 1993;102:141-159

[20] Krishnika A, Ramasamy P. Effect of chlorination, antibiotics, and UV radiation of Vibrio population in the hatchery system of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (DeMan). Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology & Environmental Sciences. 2013;15(1):

7(3):205-214

105-112

90-96

[12] Goulden EF, Hall MR, Bourne DG, Pereg LL, Høj L. Pathogenicity and infection cycle of Vibrio owensii in larviculture of the ornate spiny lobster (Panulirus ornatus). Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2012; 78(8):2841-2849. DOI: 10.1128/ AEM.07274-11 Epub 2012 Feb 3

[13] Austin B, Zhang XH. Vibrio harveyi: A significant pathogen of marine vertebrates and invertebrates. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2006;43(2): 119-124

[14] Molitoris E, Joseph SW, Krichevsky MI, Sindhuhardja W, Colwell RR. Characterization and distribution of Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated in Indonesia. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1985;50(6):1388-1394. 0099-2240/85/121388-07\$02.00/0

[15] Vaseeharan B, Ramasamy P. Abundance of potentially pathogenic micro-organisms in India. Penaeus monodon larval rearing hatcheries in India. Microbiological Research. 2003; 158(4):299-308

[16] Ramasamy P, Rajan PR, Jayakumar R, Rani S, Brennan GP. Lagenidium callinectus (Couch, 1942) infections and its control in aquacultured larval (nauplii, zoea and mysis) Indian tiger prawn Penaeus monodon. Journal of Fish Diseases. 1996; 19:75-82

[17] Jayakumar R, Ramasamy P. Bacterial and protozoan (ciliate) diseases of prawn Penaeus indicus (Crustacea). Indian Journal of Marine Sciences. 1999;28:285-296

[18] Krishnika A, Ramasamy P. Effect of water exchange to eliminate Vibrio sp.

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

during the naupliar development of Artemiafranciscana. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 2012; 7(3):205-214

References

Crustacea

p. 45

[1] FAO. The state of world aquaculture. Fisheries Technical Paper; 500, 2006

of the OsloFjord. Norway:

FiskeriDirektoratets Skrifter Serie HavUndersokelser; 1981;17:153-160

[12] Goulden EF, Hall MR, Bourne DG, Pereg LL, Høj L. Pathogenicity and infection cycle of Vibrio owensii in larviculture of the ornate spiny lobster (Panulirus ornatus). Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2012; 78(8):2841-2849. DOI: 10.1128/ AEM.07274-11 Epub 2012 Feb 3

[13] Austin B, Zhang XH. Vibrio harveyi: A significant pathogen of marine vertebrates and invertebrates. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2006;43(2):

[14] Molitoris E, Joseph SW, Krichevsky MI, Sindhuhardja W, Colwell RR. Characterization and distribution of Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated in Indonesia. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1985;50(6):1388-1394. 0099-2240/85/121388-07\$02.00/0

[15] Vaseeharan B, Ramasamy P. Abundance of potentially pathogenic micro-organisms in India. Penaeus monodon larval rearing hatcheries in India. Microbiological Research. 2003;

[16] Ramasamy P, Rajan PR, Jayakumar R, Rani S, Brennan GP. Lagenidium callinectus (Couch, 1942)

infections and its control in

[17] Jayakumar R, Ramasamy P. Bacterial and protozoan (ciliate) diseases of prawn Penaeus indicus (Crustacea). Indian Journal of Marine

Sciences. 1999;28:285-296

aquacultured larval (nauplii, zoea and mysis) Indian tiger prawn Penaeus monodon. Journal of Fish Diseases. 1996;

[18] Krishnika A, Ramasamy P. Effect of water exchange to eliminate Vibrio sp.

158(4):299-308

19:75-82

119-124

[2] FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture—2008; 2009

[3] The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. FAO's Official World Fishery and Aquaculture; 2018

[4] The shrimp panel at the National Fishery Institute's. In: Global Seafood Market Conference (GSMC); Miami, Florida, USA; 21-25 January 2018. 2018

[5] Lundin GG. Fish health quarantine. In: The World Bank Report. Global Attempts to Address Shrimp Disease. Marine/Environmental Paper 4. 1996.

[6] Stentiford G, Sritunyalucksana K, Flegel TW, Williams BAP. New paradigms to help solve the global aquaculture disease crisis. PLoS

[7] Sindermann CJ. Principal Diseases of Marine Fish and Shellfish. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. United Kingdom, London:

[8] Baross JA, Tester PA, Morita RY. Incidence, microscopy, and etiology of exoskeleton lesions in the tanner crab, Chionoecetes tanneri. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada.

[9] Taylor CC. Shell disease as a

Shore Fish; 1948. pp. 41-48

disease of lobsters (Homarus americanus). Journal of Wildlife

Diseases. 1978;14:2-10

146

mortality factor in the lobster (Homarus americanus). Fish Circ. Maine, Dep. Sea

[10] Malloy SC. Bacteria induced shell

[11] Roald SO, Aursjø J, Hästein T. Occurrence of shell disease in lobsters, Homarus gammarus in the southern part

Pathogens. 2017;13:2

Academic Press; 1990

1978;35:1141-1149

[19] Krishnika A, Ramasamy P. Antimicrobial resistance profile of Vibrio species isolated from the hatchery system of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Deman). Indian Journal of Fisheries. 2014;60(4):147-152

[20] Krishnika A, Ramasamy P. Effect of chlorination, antibiotics, and UV radiation of Vibrio population in the hatchery system of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (DeMan). Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology & Environmental Sciences. 2013;15(1): 105-112

[21] Krishnika A, Ramasamy P. Lagenidium sp infection in the larval stages of the fresh water prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (DeMan). Indian Journal of Fisheries. 2014;61(2): 90-96

[22] Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I, Umesha RK. Microbial diseases in shrimp aquaculture. In: Ramaiah N, editor. Marine Microbiology: Facets and Opportunities. Goa: National Institute of Oceanography; 2000. pp. 121-134

[23] Nakai T, Sugimoto R, Park K-H, et al. Protective effects of bacteriophage on experimental Lactococcus garvieae infection in yellowtail. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 1999;37:33-41

[24] Børsheim KY. Native marine bacteriophages. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 1993;102:141-159

[25] Thiel K. Old dogma, new tricks— 21st century phage therapy. Nature Biotechnology. 2004;1:31-36

[26] Marks T, Sharp R. Review: Bacteriophages and biotechnology: A review. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 2000;75:6-17

[27] Heldal M, Bratbak G. Production and decay of viruses in aquatic environments. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 1991;72:205-212

[28] Fuhrman JA, Suttle CA. Viruses in marine planktonic systems. Oceanography. 1993;6:51-63

[29] Nakai T, Park SC. Bacteriophage therapy of infectious diseases in aquaculture. Research in Microbiology. 2002;153(1):13-18

[30] Withey S, Cartmell E, Avery LM, et al. Bacteriophages—Potential for application in wastewater treatment processes. Science of the Total Environment. 2005;339(1-3):1-18

[31] Levin BR, Bull JJ. Population and evolutionary dynamics of phage therapy. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2004;2(2):166-173

[32] Chanishvili N. Phage therapy— History from twort and D'Herelle through soviet experience to current approaches. Advances in Virus Research. 2012;83:4-40. DOI: 10.1016/ B978-0-12-394438-2.00001-3

[33] D'Hérelle F. Surun microbe invisible antagoniste des Bacillus dysentérique. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences-Series D. 1917;165:373-375

[34] Sulakvelidze A, Kutter E. Bacteriophage therapy in humans. In: Kutter E, Sulakvelidze A, editors. Bacteriophages: Biology and Application. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2005. pp. 381-436

[35] Whitman WB et al. Prokaryotes: The unseen majority. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1998;95: 6578-6583

[36] Ramasamy P, Brennan GP. Phage therapy in aquaculture system. In: Trends in Biotechnology. India: University of Madras, Publication Division; 2002. pp. 53-60

[37] Srinivasan P, Vaseeharan B, Ramasamy P. Vibrio bacteriophages control the growth of bacterial populations in the aquatic environment. In: The Sixth Indian Fisheries Forum organized by Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Versova, Mumbai —400 061, India; during 17–20 December 2002; 16

[38] Srinivasan P, Ramasamy P. Effect of pH, temperature, enzymes, organic solvents and detergents in the survival and infectivity of Vibrio bacteriophages. In: Conference on Microbiology of the Tropical Seas (COMITS) National Institute of Oceanography; Goa, India during 13–15 December 2004

[39] Srinivasan P, Ramasamy P, Brennan GP, et al. Inhibitory effects of bacteriophages on the growth of Vibrio sp. pathogens of shrimp in the Indian aquaculture environment. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary. 2007;2(4): 166-183

[40] Vaseeharan B, Ramasamy P. Control of pathogenic Vibrio spp. Bacillus ubtilis BT23, a possible probiotic treatment for black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2003;36(2):83-87

[41] Srinivasan P, Ramasamy P. Morphological characterization and biocontrol effects of Vibrio vulnificus phages against Vibriosis in the shrimp aquaculture environment. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2017;111:472-480

[42] Park SC, Shimamura I, Fukunaga M, et al. Isolation of bacteriophages specific to a fish pathogen, Pseudomonas plecoglossicida, as a candidate for disease control. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000;66(4):1416-1422

[43] Park SC, Nakai T. Bacteriophage control of Pseudomonas plecoglossicida infection in ayu Plecoglossus altivelis. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 2003;53: 33-39

[44] O'Flaherty S, Ross RP, Coffey A. Bacteriophage and their lysins for elimination of infectious bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2009;33(4): 801-819

the coast of India. Environmental Microbiology. 2007;9(2):322-331

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

[59] Plaza N, Castillo D, Pérez Reytor D,

pathogenic vibrios. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 2018;31:24-33. DOI:

[60] Kim SG, Jun JW, Giri SS, Yun S, Kim HJ, Kim SW, et al. Isolation and

giant bacteriophage with anti-biofilm potential against Vibrio alginolyticus. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:6284

[61] Reardon S. Phage therapy gets revitalized. The rise of antibiotic resistance rekindles interest in a century-old virus treatment. Nature.

[62] Sulakvelidze A, Alavidze Z, Morris JG Jr. Bacteriophage therapy.

[63] Srinivasan P, Ramasamy P.

Chemotherapy. 2001;45(3):649-659

Occurrence, distribution and antibiotic resistance patterns of Vibrio species associated with viral diseased shrimp of south Indian aquaculture environment. International Journal of Agriculture

[65] Lodise TP, McKinnon PS. Burden of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Focus on clinical and economic outcomes. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27:

[66] Międzybrodzki R, Fortuna W, Weber-Dąbrowska B, Górski A. Phage therapy of staphylococcal infections (including MRSA) may be less expensive than antibiotic treatment.

Antimicrobial Agents and

Sciences. 2009;1(2):1-10

2006;57(4):589-608

1001-1012

[64] Gemmell CG, Edwards DI, Fraise AP, Gould FK, Ridgway GL, Warren RE, et al. Guidelines for the prophylaxis and treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in the UK. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Higuera G, García K, Bastías R. Bacteriophages in the control of

10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.10.012

characterisation of pVa-21, a

2014;510:15-16

Rattanachaikunsopon P. Isolation and

bacteriophage infecting the shrimp pathogen Vibrio harveyi. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2010;4:

[53] Maeda M, Liao IC. Effect of bacterial population on the growth of a shrimp larva, Penaeus monodon. Bulletin of National Research Institute of Aquaculture (Japan). 1992;21:25-29

[54] Jiang SC, Kellogg CA, Paul JH. Characterization of marine temperate phage-host systems isolated from Mamala Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1998;

[55] Crothers-Stomps C, Høj L, Bourne DG, et al. Isolation of lytic bacteriophage against Vibrio harveyi. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2010;

[56] Wu JL, Lin HM, Jan L, Hsu YL, Chang LH. Biological control of fish bacterial pathogen, Aeromonas

Pathology. 1981;15:271-276

Li M. Reductions of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters after bacteriophage application

Katharios P. Isolation and characterization of two lytic

418-419:171-176

eCollection 2016

149

hydrophila by bacteriophage AH 1. Fish

[57] Rong R, Lin H, Wang J, Khan MN,

during depuration. Aquaculture. 2014;

[58] Kalatzis PG, Bastías R, Kokkari C,

bacteriophages, φSt2 and φGrn1; phage therapy application for biological control of Vibrio alginolyticus in aquaculture live feeds. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0151101. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151101.

[52] Phumkhachorn P,

1794-1800

64:535-542

108(5):1744-1750

partial characterization of a

[45] Kim JH, Gomez DK, Nakai T, et al. Isolation and identification of bacteriophages infecting ayu Plecoglossus altivelisaltivelis specific Flavobacterium psychrophilum. Veterinary Microbiology. 2010;140(1-2):109-115

[46] Karunasagar I, Vinod MG, Kennedy B, et al. Biocontrol of bacterial pathogens in aquaculture with emphasis on phage therapy. In: Walker PJ, Lester RG, Bondad-Reantaso MG, editors. Diseases in Asian Aquaculture V. Fish Health Section. Manila: Asian Fisheries Society; 2005. pp. 535-542

[47] Austin B, Stuckey LF, Robertson PAW, Effendi I, DRW G. A control agents in aquaculture. Journal of Ocean University of China. 1995;6(1): 76-79

[48] Vinod MG, Shivu MM, Umesha KR, et al. Isolation of Vibrio harveyi bacteriophage with a potential for biocontrol of luminous vibriosis in hatchery environments. Aquaculture. 2006;255(1-4):117-124

[49] Karunasagar I, Shivu MM, Girisha SK, et al. Biocontrol of pathogens in shrimp Hatcheries using bacteriophages. Aquaculture. 2007;268 (1-4):288-292

[50] Chrisolite B, Thiyagarajan S, Alavandi SV, et al. Distribution of luminescent Vibrio harveyi and their bacteriophages in a commercial shrimp hatchery in SouthIndia. Aquaculture. 2008;275(1-4):13-19

[51] Shivu MM, Rajeeva BC, Girisha SK, et al. Molecular characterization of Vibrio harveyi bacterio-phages isolated from aquaculture environments along

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

the coast of India. Environmental Microbiology. 2007;9(2):322-331

[37] Srinivasan P, Vaseeharan B, Ramasamy P. Vibrio bacteriophages control the growth of bacterial

December 2002; 16

Crustacea

populations in the aquatic environment. In: The Sixth Indian Fisheries Forum organized by Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Versova, Mumbai —400 061, India; during 17–20

[44] O'Flaherty S, Ross RP, Coffey A. Bacteriophage and their lysins for elimination of infectious bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2009;33(4):

[45] Kim JH, Gomez DK, Nakai T, et al.

bacteriophages infecting ayu Plecoglossus altivelisaltivelis specific Flavobacterium psychrophilum. Veterinary Microbiology.

Kennedy B, et al. Biocontrol of bacterial pathogens in aquaculture with emphasis

Isolation and identification of

[46] Karunasagar I, Vinod MG,

on phage therapy. In: Walker PJ, Lester RG, Bondad-Reantaso MG,

Aquaculture V. Fish Health Section. Manila: Asian Fisheries Society; 2005.

Robertson PAW, Effendi I, DRW G. A control agents in aquaculture. Journal of Ocean University of China. 1995;6(1):

[48] Vinod MG, Shivu MM, Umesha KR,

et al. Isolation of Vibrio harveyi bacteriophage with a potential for biocontrol of luminous vibriosis in hatchery environments. Aquaculture.

[49] Karunasagar I, Shivu MM, Girisha SK, et al. Biocontrol of pathogens in shrimp Hatcheries using bacteriophages. Aquaculture. 2007;268

[50] Chrisolite B, Thiyagarajan S, Alavandi SV, et al. Distribution of luminescent Vibrio harveyi and their bacteriophages in a commercial shrimp hatchery in SouthIndia. Aquaculture.

[51] Shivu MM, Rajeeva BC, Girisha SK, et al. Molecular characterization of Vibrio harveyi bacterio-phages isolated from aquaculture environments along

2006;255(1-4):117-124

(1-4):288-292

2008;275(1-4):13-19

editors. Diseases in Asian

[47] Austin B, Stuckey LF,

pp. 535-542

76-79

2010;140(1-2):109-115

801-819

[38] Srinivasan P, Ramasamy P. Effect of pH, temperature, enzymes, organic solvents and detergents in the survival and infectivity of Vibrio bacteriophages. In: Conference on Microbiology of the Tropical Seas (COMITS) National Institute of Oceanography; Goa, India

during 13–15 December 2004

[39] Srinivasan P, Ramasamy P,

[40] Vaseeharan B, Ramasamy P. Control of pathogenic Vibrio spp. Bacillus ubtilis BT23, a possible probiotic treatment for black tiger shrimp Penaeus

monodon. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2003;36(2):83-87

[41] Srinivasan P, Ramasamy P. Morphological characterization and biocontrol effects of Vibrio vulnificus phages against Vibriosis in the shrimp aquaculture environment. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2017;111:472-480

to a fish pathogen, Pseudomonas

[42] Park SC, Shimamura I, Fukunaga M, et al. Isolation of bacteriophages specific

plecoglossicida, as a candidate for disease control. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000;66(4):1416-1422

[43] Park SC, Nakai T. Bacteriophage control of Pseudomonas plecoglossicida infection in ayu Plecoglossus altivelis. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 2003;53:

166-183

33-39

148

Brennan GP, et al. Inhibitory effects of bacteriophages on the growth of Vibrio sp. pathogens of shrimp in the Indian aquaculture environment. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary. 2007;2(4):

[52] Phumkhachorn P, Rattanachaikunsopon P. Isolation and partial characterization of a bacteriophage infecting the shrimp pathogen Vibrio harveyi. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2010;4: 1794-1800

[53] Maeda M, Liao IC. Effect of bacterial population on the growth of a shrimp larva, Penaeus monodon. Bulletin of National Research Institute of Aquaculture (Japan). 1992;21:25-29

[54] Jiang SC, Kellogg CA, Paul JH. Characterization of marine temperate phage-host systems isolated from Mamala Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1998; 64:535-542

[55] Crothers-Stomps C, Høj L, Bourne DG, et al. Isolation of lytic bacteriophage against Vibrio harveyi. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2010; 108(5):1744-1750

[56] Wu JL, Lin HM, Jan L, Hsu YL, Chang LH. Biological control of fish bacterial pathogen, Aeromonas hydrophila by bacteriophage AH 1. Fish Pathology. 1981;15:271-276

[57] Rong R, Lin H, Wang J, Khan MN, Li M. Reductions of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters after bacteriophage application during depuration. Aquaculture. 2014; 418-419:171-176

[58] Kalatzis PG, Bastías R, Kokkari C, Katharios P. Isolation and characterization of two lytic bacteriophages, φSt2 and φGrn1; phage therapy application for biological control of Vibrio alginolyticus in aquaculture live feeds. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0151101. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151101. eCollection 2016

[59] Plaza N, Castillo D, Pérez Reytor D, Higuera G, García K, Bastías R. Bacteriophages in the control of pathogenic vibrios. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 2018;31:24-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.10.012

[60] Kim SG, Jun JW, Giri SS, Yun S, Kim HJ, Kim SW, et al. Isolation and characterisation of pVa-21, a giant bacteriophage with anti-biofilm potential against Vibrio alginolyticus. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:6284

[61] Reardon S. Phage therapy gets revitalized. The rise of antibiotic resistance rekindles interest in a century-old virus treatment. Nature. 2014;510:15-16

[62] Sulakvelidze A, Alavidze Z, Morris JG Jr. Bacteriophage therapy. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2001;45(3):649-659

[63] Srinivasan P, Ramasamy P. Occurrence, distribution and antibiotic resistance patterns of Vibrio species associated with viral diseased shrimp of south Indian aquaculture environment. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences. 2009;1(2):1-10

[64] Gemmell CG, Edwards DI, Fraise AP, Gould FK, Ridgway GL, Warren RE, et al. Guidelines for the prophylaxis and treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in the UK. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2006;57(4):589-608

[65] Lodise TP, McKinnon PS. Burden of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Focus on clinical and economic outcomes. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27: 1001-1012

[66] Międzybrodzki R, Fortuna W, Weber-Dąbrowska B, Górski A. Phage therapy of staphylococcal infections (including MRSA) may be less expensive than antibiotic treatment.

Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2007;61: 461-465

[67] Smith HW, Huggins MB. Successful treatment of experimental Escherichia coli infections in mice using phage: Its general superiority over antibiotics. Journal of General Microbiology. 1982;128: 307-318

[68] Holmström K, Gräslund S, Wahlström A, et al. Antibiotic use in shrimp farming and implications for environmental impacts and human health. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2003;38(3): 255-266

[69] Karunasagar I, Pai R, Malathi GR, et al. Mass mortality of Penaeus monodon larvae due to antibiotic-resistant Vibrio harveyi infection. Aquaculture. 1994;128 (3-4):203-209

[70] Jayakumar R, Ramasamy P. Prevalence, biotyping and resistotyping of Pseudomonas spp. and Vibrio sp isolated from Penaeus indicus of Ennore Estuary, Madras, India. In: Chou LM, Munro AD, Lam TJ, Chen TW, Cheong LKK, Ding JK, et al. editors. Proceedings of Third Asian Fisheries Forum, Singapore. 1994. pp. 335-338

[71] Vaseeharan B, Ramasamy P, Murugan T, Chen JC. In vitro susceptibility of antibiotics against Vibrio spp. and Aeromonas spp. isolated from Penaeus monodon hatcheries and ponds. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2005; 26:285-291

[72] Ramasamy P, Sujatha Rani J, Gunasekaran DR. Assessment of antibiotic sensitivity and pathogenicity of Vibrio spp. and Aeromonas spp. from aquaculture environment. MOJ Ecology & Environmental Sciences. 2018;3(3): 128-136

[73] Vaseeharana B, Lin J, Ramasamy P. Effect of probiotics, antibiotic sensitivity, pathogenicity, and plasmid profiles of Listonella anguillarum-like bacteria isolated from Penaeus monodon culture systems. Aquaculture. 2004;241: 77-91

Biotechnology (New York, N.Y.). 2010;

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

> [91] Jameson JD. Role of probiotics in aquaculture practices. Fishing Chimes.

Christianus A, Kamarudin MS, Sijam K, Sinaian P. Assessment of possible human risk of probiotic application in shrimp farming. International Food Research Journal. 2011;18:433-437

[92] Shakibazadeh S, Saad CR,

[93] Kumar V, Roy S, Meena DK, Sarkar UK. Application of probiotics in shrimp aquaculture: Importance, mechanisms of action, and methods of administration. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture. 2016;24(4):

[94] Nogami K, Maeda M. Bacteria as biocontrol agents for rearing larvae of the crab Portunus trituberculatus. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2011;49(11): 2373-2376. DOI: 10.1139/f92-261

[95] Nogami K, Hamasaki K, Maeda M, Hirayama K. Biocontrol method in aquaculture for rearing the swimming crab larvae Portunus trituberculatus. Hydrobiologia. 1997;358:291-295

[96] Nogami K, Hamasaki K, Maeda M, Hirayama K. Biocontrol method in aquaculture for rearing the swimming crab larvae Portunus trituberculatus. In: Hagiwara A, Snell TW, Lubzens E, Tamaru CS, editors. Live Food in Aquaculture. Developments in Hydrobiology. Vol. 124. Dordrecht:

[97] Martínez-Díaz SF, Hipólito-Morales A. Efficacy of phage therapy to prevent mortality during the vibriosis of brine shrimp. Aquaculture. 2013;400-401:

[98] Quiroz-Guzmán E, Peña-Rodriguez A, Vázquez-Juárez R, Barajas-Sandoval DR, Balcázar JL, Martínez-Díaz SF.

Springer; 1997

120-124. DOI: 10.1016/j. aquaculture.2013.03.007

342-368. DOI: 10.1080/ 23308249.2016.1193841

2003;23:9

Rowland I. Health benefits of probiotics: Are mixtures more effective than single strains? European Journal of Nutrition.

[82] Chapman CM, Gibson GR,

[83] Fjellheim AJ, Klinkenberg G, Skjermo J, Aasen IM, Vadstein O. Selection of candidate probionts by two different screening strategies from Atlantic cod (Gadusmorhua L.) larvae. Veterinary Microbiology. 2010;144:

[84] Heidarieh M, Afsharnasab M, Soltani M, Dashtyannasab A,

of ergosan and vibromax to prevent vibriosis and WSSV in Litopenaeus vannamei. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 2010;5:

of probiotics. In: Probiotics.

[86] Robles R, Sorgeloos P, Van Duffel H, Nelis H. Progress in biomedication using live foods.

Rajabifar S, Sheikhzadeh N, et al. Effects

[85] Fuller R. History and development

Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 1998;14:

[87] Green A, Green M. Probiotics in Asian shrimp aquaculture. MPEDA

[88] Haung HJ. Important tools to the success of shrimp aquaculture—

Aeration and the applications of tea seed cake and probiotics. Aquaculture

[89] Ahilan B. Probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture International. 2003:39-40

[90] Mishra S, Mohanty S, Pattnaik P, Ayyappan S. Probiotics—Possible role in aquaculture. Fishing Chimes. 2001;

Netherlands: Springer; 1992. pp. 1-8

12(4):361-379

2011;50(1):1-17

153-159

120-125

207-212

Newsletter; 2003

21(1):31-36

151

International. 2003:13-16

[74] Verschuere L, Rombaut G, Sorgeloos P, et al. Probiotic bacteria as biological control agents in aquaculture. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2000; 64(4):655-671

[75] Rengipipat S, Rukpratanporn S, Piyatiratitivorakul S, Menasaveta P. Immunity enhancement in black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) by a probiont bacterium (Bacillus S11). Aquaculture. 2000;191:271-288

[76] Gatesoupe FJ. The use of probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture. 1999;180 (1-2):147-165

[77] Adamek Z. Effect of ascogen probiotics supplementation on the growth rate of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss under conditions of intensive culture. Zivocisna Vyroba. 1994;39(3):247-253

[78] Balcázar JL, De Blas I, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, Cunningham D, Vendrell D, Múzquiz JL. The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Veterinary Microbiology. 2006;114:173-186. DOI: 10.1016/j. vetmic.2006.01.009

[79] Van Hai N, Buller N, Fotedar R. The use of customised probiotics in the cultivation of western king prawns (Penaeus latisulcatus Kishinouye, 1896). Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2009;27: 100-104

[80] Nayak SK. Probiotics and immunity: A fish perspective. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2010;29(1):2-14

[81] Magnadottir B. Immunological control of fish diseases. Marine

Phage Therapy for Control of Bacterial Diseases DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88043

Biotechnology (New York, N.Y.). 2010; 12(4):361-379

Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2007;61:

[73] Vaseeharana B, Lin J, Ramasamy P.

sensitivity, pathogenicity, and plasmid profiles of Listonella anguillarum-like bacteria isolated from Penaeus monodon culture systems. Aquaculture. 2004;241:

Effect of probiotics, antibiotic

[74] Verschuere L, Rombaut G, Sorgeloos P, et al. Probiotic bacteria as biological control agents in aquaculture. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2000;

[75] Rengipipat S, Rukpratanporn S, Piyatiratitivorakul S, Menasaveta P. Immunity enhancement in black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) by a probiont bacterium (Bacillus S11). Aquaculture.

[76] Gatesoupe FJ. The use of probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture. 1999;180

Oncorhynchus mykiss under conditions of intensive culture. Zivocisna Vyroba.

[78] Balcázar JL, De Blas I, Ruiz-Zarzuela

[79] Van Hai N, Buller N, Fotedar R. The use of customised probiotics in the cultivation of western king prawns (Penaeus latisulcatus Kishinouye, 1896). Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2009;27:

[80] Nayak SK. Probiotics and immunity: A fish perspective. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2010;29(1):2-14

[81] Magnadottir B. Immunological control of fish diseases. Marine

I, Cunningham D, Vendrell D, Múzquiz JL. The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Veterinary Microbiology. 2006;114:173-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.

[77] Adamek Z. Effect of ascogen probiotics supplementation on the growth rate of rainbow trout

77-91

64(4):655-671

2000;191:271-288

(1-2):147-165

1994;39(3):247-253

vetmic.2006.01.009

100-104

Successful treatment of experimental Escherichia coli infections in mice using phage: Its general superiority

of General Microbiology. 1982;128:

[69] Karunasagar I, Pai R, Malathi GR, et al. Mass mortality of Penaeus monodon larvae due to antibiotic-resistant Vibrio harveyi infection. Aquaculture. 1994;128

[70] Jayakumar R, Ramasamy P.

Proceedings of Third Asian Fisheries Forum, Singapore. 1994.

[71] Vaseeharan B, Ramasamy P, Murugan T, Chen JC. In vitro susceptibility of antibiotics against Vibrio spp. and Aeromonas spp. isolated from Penaeus monodon hatcheries and ponds. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2005;

[72] Ramasamy P, Sujatha Rani J, Gunasekaran DR. Assessment of

antibiotic sensitivity and pathogenicity of Vibrio spp. and Aeromonas spp. from aquaculture environment. MOJ Ecology & Environmental Sciences. 2018;3(3):

Prevalence, biotyping and resistotyping of Pseudomonas spp. and Vibrio sp isolated from Penaeus indicus of Ennore Estuary, Madras, India. In: Chou LM, Munro AD, Lam TJ, Chen TW, Cheong LKK, Ding JK, et al. editors.

[68] Holmström K, Gräslund S, Wahlström A, et al. Antibiotic use in shrimp farming and implications for environmental impacts and human health. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2003;38(3):

[67] Smith HW, Huggins MB.

over antibiotics. Journal

461-465

Crustacea

307-318

255-266

(3-4):203-209

pp. 335-338

26:285-291

128-136

150

[82] Chapman CM, Gibson GR, Rowland I. Health benefits of probiotics: Are mixtures more effective than single strains? European Journal of Nutrition. 2011;50(1):1-17

[83] Fjellheim AJ, Klinkenberg G, Skjermo J, Aasen IM, Vadstein O. Selection of candidate probionts by two different screening strategies from Atlantic cod (Gadusmorhua L.) larvae. Veterinary Microbiology. 2010;144: 153-159

[84] Heidarieh M, Afsharnasab M, Soltani M, Dashtyannasab A, Rajabifar S, Sheikhzadeh N, et al. Effects of ergosan and vibromax to prevent vibriosis and WSSV in Litopenaeus vannamei. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 2010;5: 120-125

[85] Fuller R. History and development of probiotics. In: Probiotics. Netherlands: Springer; 1992. pp. 1-8

[86] Robles R, Sorgeloos P, Van Duffel H, Nelis H. Progress in biomedication using live foods. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 1998;14: 207-212

[87] Green A, Green M. Probiotics in Asian shrimp aquaculture. MPEDA Newsletter; 2003

[88] Haung HJ. Important tools to the success of shrimp aquaculture— Aeration and the applications of tea seed cake and probiotics. Aquaculture International. 2003:13-16

[89] Ahilan B. Probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture International. 2003:39-40

[90] Mishra S, Mohanty S, Pattnaik P, Ayyappan S. Probiotics—Possible role in aquaculture. Fishing Chimes. 2001; 21(1):31-36

[91] Jameson JD. Role of probiotics in aquaculture practices. Fishing Chimes. 2003;23:9

[92] Shakibazadeh S, Saad CR, Christianus A, Kamarudin MS, Sijam K, Sinaian P. Assessment of possible human risk of probiotic application in shrimp farming. International Food Research Journal. 2011;18:433-437

[93] Kumar V, Roy S, Meena DK, Sarkar UK. Application of probiotics in shrimp aquaculture: Importance, mechanisms of action, and methods of administration. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture. 2016;24(4): 342-368. DOI: 10.1080/ 23308249.2016.1193841

[94] Nogami K, Maeda M. Bacteria as biocontrol agents for rearing larvae of the crab Portunus trituberculatus. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2011;49(11): 2373-2376. DOI: 10.1139/f92-261

[95] Nogami K, Hamasaki K, Maeda M, Hirayama K. Biocontrol method in aquaculture for rearing the swimming crab larvae Portunus trituberculatus. Hydrobiologia. 1997;358:291-295

[96] Nogami K, Hamasaki K, Maeda M, Hirayama K. Biocontrol method in aquaculture for rearing the swimming crab larvae Portunus trituberculatus. In: Hagiwara A, Snell TW, Lubzens E, Tamaru CS, editors. Live Food in Aquaculture. Developments in Hydrobiology. Vol. 124. Dordrecht: Springer; 1997

[97] Martínez-Díaz SF, Hipólito-Morales A. Efficacy of phage therapy to prevent mortality during the vibriosis of brine shrimp. Aquaculture. 2013;400-401: 120-124. DOI: 10.1016/j. aquaculture.2013.03.007

[98] Quiroz-Guzmán E, Peña-Rodriguez A, Vázquez-Juárez R, Barajas-Sandoval DR, Balcázar JL, Martínez-Díaz SF.

Bacteriophage cocktails as an environmentally-friendly approach to prevent Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio harveyi infections in brine shrimp (Artemia franciscana) production. Aquaculture. 2018:273-279. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.04.025

[99] Quiroz Guzman E, Peña A, Vázquez-Juárez R, Martínez-Díaz SF. Bacteriophage cocktails as an environmentally-friendly approach to prevent Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio harveyi infections in brine shrimp (Artemia franciscana) production. Aquaculture. 2018;492:273-279

[100] Oakey HJ, Cullen BR, Owens L. The complete nucleotide sequence of the Vibrio harveyi bacteriophage VHML. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2002; 93(6):1089-1098

[101] Stalin N, Srinivasan P. Characterization of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and its specific phage from shrimp pond in Palk Strait, South East coast of India. Biologicals. 2016; 44(6):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j. biologicals.2016.08.003

**153**

Section 5

Bioaccumulation
