**Acknowledgements**

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. 0910.

## **Author details**

Jessica Hagman Department of Mathematics, Colorado State University, United States

\*Address all correspondence to: jess.ellis@colostate.edu

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**149**

*Towards a Forward-Thinking College Calculus Program DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.87940*

> [10] Wu H. The mathematician and the mathematics education reform. Notices of the AMS. 1996;**43**(12):1531-1537

[11] Sonnert G, Ellis J. Appendix B: Survey Questions and Codebook D. In: Bressoud D, Mesa V, Rasmussen C, editors. Insights and Recommendations

from the MAA National Study of College Calculus. MAA Notes. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America; 2015.

[12] Ellis J, Fosdick BK, Rasmussen C. Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLoS

[13] Rasmussen C, Ellis J, Zazkis D, Bressoud D. Features of successful calculus programs at five doctoral degree granting institutions. In: Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME38 and PME-NA36. Vol. 5. 2014. pp. 33-40

[14] Hagman JE. The 8th characteristic for successful calculus programs: Diversity, equity, & inclusion practices.

[15] Valencia RR. Conceptualizing the notion of deficit thinking. The Evolution

of Deficit Thinking: Educational Thought and Practice. 1997;**19**(1):1-12

[16] Harper SR. An anti-deficit achievement framework for research on students of color in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research.

[17] Esmonde I. Ideas and identities: Supporting equity in cooperative mathematics learning. Review of Educational Research. 2009;**79**(2):1008-

2010;**148**(148):63-74

1043. Chicago

One. 2016;**11**(7):e0157447

pp. 139-169

PRIMUS. 2019

[1] Rasmussen C, Marrongelle K, Borba MC. Research on calculus: What do we know and where do we need to

go? ZDM. 2014;**46**(4):507-515

University Press. 2019

Journal. 1970;**1**(1):60-86

Enthusiast. 2014;**11**(3):495

[5] Tucker A. The history of the undergraduate program in

[6] Conference Board of the Mathematics Sciences (CBMS). Statement on Active Learning in Post-Secondary Mathematics Education. 2016. Available from: http://www. cbmsweb.org/Statements/Active\_

Learning\_Statement.pdf

participation/ap-2018

2013;**44**(5):685-698

Education. 1995;**6**(6):3-5

2013;**120**(8):689-705

[2] Bressoud DM. Calculus Reordered: A History of the Big Ideas. Princeton

[3] Boyer CB. The history of the calculus. The Two-Year College Mathematics

[4] Webb P. The development of calculus in the Kerala school. The Mathematics

mathematics in the United States. The American Mathematical Monthly.

[7] College Board. Advanced Placement Program National Summary Reports. 2018. Available from: https://research. collegeboard.org/programs/ap/data/

[8] Bressoud DM, Carlson MP, Mesa V, Rasmussen C. The calculus student: Insights from the Mathematical Association of America national study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology.

[9] Schoenfeld AH. A brief biography of calculus reform. UME Trends: News and Reports on Undergraduate Mathematics

**References**

*Towards a Forward-Thinking College Calculus Program DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.87940*
