**Author details**

Francisco Plaza1,2, Rodrigo Salas1,3 and Orietta Nicolis4,5\*

1 University of Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile

2 Institute for Fisheries Development (IFOP), Valparaíso, Chile

3 Center for Research and Development for Health Engineering, CINGS-UV, Chile

4 University of Andres Bello, Viña del Mar, Chile

5 National Research Center for Integrated National Disaster Management (CIGIDEN), Chile

\*Address all correspondence to: orietta.nicolis@unab.cl

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**13**

*Assessing Seismic Hazard in Chile Using Deep Neural Networks*

Journal of Geophysical Research - Solid

Earth. 2013;**118**(2013):616-629

[9] Kumazawa T, Ogata Y, et al. Nonstationary ETAS models for nonstandard earthquakes. Annals of Applied Statistics.

[10] Guo Y, Zhuang J, Zhou S. An improved space-time ETAS model for inverting the rupture geometry from seismicity triggering. Journal of Geophysical Research - Solid Earth.

[11] Nicolis O, Chiodi M, Adelfio G. Windowed ETAS models with application to the Chilean seismic catalogs. Spatial Statistics.

[12] Utsu T. A statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks. Geophysical

Magazine. 1961;**30**:521-605

[13] Daley DJ, Vere-Jones D. An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes. New York, USA: Springer;

[14] Nicolis O, Chiodi M, Adelfio G. Space-time forecasting of seismic events in Chile. In: Earthquakes-Tectonics, Hazard and Risk Mitigation.

[15] Joffe H, Rossetto T, Bradley C, O'Connor C. Stigma in science: The case of earthquake prediction. Disasters.

[16] Liu W, Wang Z, Liu X, Zeng N, Liu Y, Alsaadi FE. A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications. Neurocomputing.

[17] Rasmussen JG. Temporal point processes: The conditional intensity function. Lecture Notes; 2011

2014;**8**(3):1825-1852

2015;**120**(5):3309-3323

2015;**14**:151-165

2003. 469p

Rijeka: InTech; 2017

2018;**42**(1):81-100

2017;**234**:11-26

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.83403*

[1] Lomnitz C. Major earthquakes of Chile: A historical survey, 1535- 1960. Seismological Research Letters. 2004;**75**(3):368. Available from: http://dx.

[2] Norio O, Ye T, Kajitani Y, Shi P, Tatano H. The 2011 eastern Japan great earthquake disaster: Overview and comments. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. 2011;**2**(1):34-42

doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.75.3.368

[3] Sobolev GA. Methodology, results, and problems of forecasting

prediction. In: Introduction to

[5] Ogata Y. Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[6] Lombardi AM, Cocco M, Marzocchi W. On the increase of background seismicity rate during the 1997- 1998 Umbria-Marche, Central Italy, sequence: Apparent variation or fluid-driven triggering? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7] Ogata Y. Significant improvements of the space-time ETAS model for forecasting of accurate baseline seismicity. Earth, Planets and Space.

[8] Bansal A, Ogata Y. A non-stationary epidemic type aftershock sequence model for seismicity prior to the December 26, 2004 m 9.1 Sumatra-Andaman islands mega-earthquake.

[4] Cimellaro GP, Marasco S. Earthquake

Dynamics of Structures and Earthquake Engineering. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG a part of Springer Nature; 2018. pp. 263-280

earthquakes. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

2015;**85**(2):107-111

1988;**83**(401):9-27

2010;**100**(3):1138-1152

2011;**63**:217-229

**References**

*Assessing Seismic Hazard in Chile Using Deep Neural Networks DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.83403*
