**Author details**

Francisco Javier Lara-Medina1,2\*, Olivia Esteban1,2, Isabel Bartolomé1,2, C. Ispa1,2, Javier Mateo1,2 and Francisco Javier Ascaso1,2,3

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínico Universitario "Lozano Blesa", Zaragoza, Spain

2 Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragon), Zaragoza, Spain

3 School of Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

\*Address all correspondence to: javierlara@me.com

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**79**

*New Landmarks, Signs, and Findings in Optical Coherence Tomography*

and visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: Autofluorescence in retinitis pigmentosa. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology.

[9] Wakabayashi T, Oshima Y, Fujimoto H, Murakami Y, Sakaguchi H, Kusaka S, et al. Foveal microstructure and visual acuity after retinal detachment repair. Ophthalmology. 2009;**116**(3):519-528

[10] Bottoni F, De Angelis S, Luccarelli S, Cigada M, Staurenghi G. The dynamic healing process of idiopathic macular holes after surgical repair: A spectraldomain optical coherence tomography study. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;**52**(7):4439

[11] Ooka E, Mitamura Y, Baba T, Kitahashi M, Oshitari T, Yamamoto S. Foveal microstructure on spectraldomain optical coherence tomographic images and visual function after

of Ophthalmology. 2011;**152**(2):

[12] Shimozono M, Oishi A, Hata M, Kurimoto Y. Restoration of the photoreceptor outer segment and visual outcomes after macular hole closure: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography analysis. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2011;**249**(10):1469-1476

[13] Wakabayashi T, Fujiwara M, Sakaguchi H, Kusaka S, Oshima Y. Foveal microstructure and visual acuity in surgically closed macular holes: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic analysis. Ophthalmology.

[14] Oishi A, Shimozono M, Mandai M, Hata M, Nishida A, Kurimoto Y. Recovery of photoreceptor outer segments after anti-VEGF therapy for

2010;**117**(9):1815-1824

283-290.e1

macular hole surgery. American Journal

2010;**38**(6):597-604

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84242*

[1] Arevalo JF, Lasave AF, Arias J, Serrano M, Arevalo F. Clinical applications of optical coherence tomography in the posterior pole: The 2011 José Manuel Espino lecture part I. Clinical Ophthalmology.

[2] Chauhan DS, Antcliff RJ, Rai PA, Williamson TH, Marshall J. Papillofoveal traction in macular hole formation: The role of optical coherence tomography. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2000;**118**(1):32-38

[3] Turgut B, Demir T. The new

landmarks, findings and signs in optical coherence tomography. New Frontiers in Ophthalmology. 2016;**2**(3):131-136

[4] Staurenghi G, Sadda S, Chakravarthy U, Spaide RF. Proposed lexicon for anatomic landmarks in normal posterior

[5] Saxena S, Srivastav K, Cheung CM, Ng JY, Lai TY. Photoreceptor inner segment ellipsoid band integrity on spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Clinical Ophthalmology.

[6] Spaide RF, Curcio CA. Anatomical correlates to the bands seen in the outer retina by optical coherence tomography: Literature review and model. Retina.

[7] Mitamura Y, Mitamura-Aizawa S, Katome T, Naito T, Hagiwara A, Kumagai K, et al. Photoreceptor impairment and restoration on optical coherence tomographic image. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013;**2013**:1-7

[8] Aizawa S, Mitamura Y, Hagiwara A, Sugawara T, Yamamoto S. Changes of fundus autofluorescence, photoreceptor inner and outer segment junction line,

segment spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology.

2014;**121**(8):1572-1578

2014;**8**:2507-2522

2011;**31**(8):1609-1619

**References**

2013;**7**:2165-2179

*New Landmarks, Signs, and Findings in Optical Coherence Tomography DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84242*
