**Chapter 5**

*Innovations in Assisted Reproduction Technology*

AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive

during *in vitro* fertilization. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003;**102**:816-822

Bhattacharya S, Johnson NP. Ultrasound tests of ovarian reserve; a systematic review of accuracy in predicting fertility outcomes. Human Fertility.

[36] Gibreel A, Maheshwari A,

2009;**12**(2):95-106

[30] Kahraman S, Vicdan K, Işik AZ, Ozgün OD, Alaybeyoğlu L, Polat G, et al. Clomiphene citrate challenge test in the assessment of ovarian reserve before controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 1997;**73**:177-182

[31] Chuang CC, Chen CD, Chao KH, Chen SU, Ho HN, Yang Y. Age is a better predictor of pregnancy potential than basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels in women undergoing *in vitro* fertilization. Fertility and Sterility.

[32] de Bruin JP, te Velde ER. Female reproductive ageing: Concepts and consequences. In: Tulandi T, Gosden RG, editors. Preservation of Fertility. London UK: Taylor and

[33] Fanchin R, Taieb J, Lozano DH, Ducot B, Frydman R, Bouyer J. High reproducibility of serum anti-Mullerian hormone measurements suggests a multi-staged follicular secretion and strengthens its role in the assessment of ovarian follicular status. Human Reproduction. 2005;**20**:923-927

[34] Higgins RV, van Nagell JR,

[35] Järvelä IY, Sladkevicius P,

signal with three-dimensional ultrasonography to predict response

Woods CH, Thompson EA, Kryscio RJ. Interobserver variation in ovarian measurements using transvaginal sonography. Gynecologic Oncology.

Kelly S, Ojha K, Campbell S, Nargund G. Quantification of ovarian power doppler

response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: A meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update.

2011;**17**:46-54

2003;**79**:63-68

Francis; 2004

1990;**39**:69-71

**74**
