*3.2.1 Microhardness*

The microhardness of both the weld metals (without and with Ce containing) after austempering at 300 and 350°C for 1.5, 2 and 2.5 h holding time were taken at six different positions of the weld metal and the average of six considered final value. The average microhardness of the weld metals at both 300 and 350°C austempering temperature are plotted in **Figure 10** with respect to the holding time. **Figure 10** demonstrates that at 300°C both the weld metal shows higher hardness value than 350°C due to the variation of the amount of carbon enriched austenite. However, the hardness values are changed with changing the austempering holding time. In both the weld metals at both 300 and 350°C holding time changed from 1.5 to 2 h, the hardness values are decreased with increasing the amount of retained austenite. With increasing holding time from 2 to 2.5 h the hardness values are increased, with decreasing the amount of carbon enriched retained austenite in weld metals. At higher holding time the stage II reaction was started and the carbon enriched retained was diffused to bainitic ferrite and carbide, as a results the amount of retained austenite was decreased and the hardness value increased [41]. At both the austempering temperature of both weld metals at 2 h holding time attributed lower hardness value, the presence of higher amount of retained austenite.

Further, at each austempering conditions Ce containing weld metal shows lower hardness value due to higher amount of carbon enriched retained austenite in weld


**139**

*Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Austempered Ductile Iron Weld Joints Using Developed…*

metal and attributed minimum hardness (273Hv) at 350°C for 2 h holding time presence of higher amount of retained austenite (46.7%) compared to without Ce

*Variation of microhardness of weld metals at different holding time austempering at (a) 300°C and (b) 350°C* 

The transverse tensile tests of Trial 4 and Trial 7 weld joints after austempering at 300 and 350°C for 2 h holding time were carried out. For both the austempering conditions of both the weld metals failure of the test samples took place from the base metal as shown in **Figure 11**, indicating that weld metal is stronger than base metal. Thus the transverse tensile results show 100% joint efficiency of ADI weld metals (at 300 and 350°C for 2 h holding time) indicating successfully development of coated electrode and establishment of a weld procedure which could be

The tensile properties of ADI is strongly depends on the amount of retained austenite and its carbon content, the shape and size of bainitic ferrite and the

350°C austempering temperature for 2 h holding time.

numbers of graphite nodules presence in per unit area [42, 43]. At each austempering conditions both the weld metal attributed more amount of retained austenite and finer bainitic ferrite and smaller size of graphite nodules compare to base metal and HAZ. During tensile testing weld metal is possibly more strain hardened compare to base metal and HAZ due to presence of higher amount of retained austenite [43, 44]. It is well known that austenite having FCC structure possesses higher strain hardening rate than BCC ferrite (bainitic ferrite) and the strain hardening rate of austenite also increases with presence of carbon content [45]. Thus, one would expect, due to more amount of retained austenite along with higher carbon, that tensile strength of Ce containing weld metal would be higher than weld metal having without Ce at

The average sub-size Charpy impact values of without and with Ce containing weld metals after austempering at 300 and 350°C for 2 h holding time are given in **Table 4**. The result states that the Charpy impact values are increased with increasing the austempering temperature from 300 to 350°C. The Charpy impact values are strongly depends on the amount of retained austenite, shape and size of bainitic

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84763*

content weld metal.

*using Trial 4 and Trial 7 electrodes.*

applied commercially.

*3.2.3 Charpy impact test*

*3.2.2 Tensile test*

**Figure 10.**

#### **Table 4.**

*Mechanical properties of ADI weld metals.*

*Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Austempered Ductile Iron Weld Joints Using Developed… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84763*

**Figure 10.**

*Recent Advancements in the Metallurgical Engineering and Electrodeposition*

nodularity and numbers of nodule presence in per mm2

the weld metals.

*3.2.1 Microhardness*

retained austenite.

**Electrode Austempering** 

*Mechanical properties of ADI weld metals.*

**temperature (°C)**

**3.2 Mechanical properties**

and austenite become stabilized. Thus, maximum stability of retained austenite should possess at 2 h holding time, irrespective of austempering temperature of both

The mechanical properties of ADI welded joints depends on the amount of retained austenite and its carbon content presence in microstructure [1, 2, 40]. Mechanical properties were varied with varying the austempering temperature and it's holding time due to the variation of microstructural constitutes, shape and size,

temperature microstructure consists of needle shaped bainitic ferrite with small amount of retained austenite indicates higher tensile strength and hardness with lower the toughness. However, at 350°C austempering temperature structure shows feathery shaped bainitic ferrite with higher amount of retained austenite indicated lower tensile strength and hardness with higher toughness and fatigue strength. The average mechanical properties of both the weld metals (Trial 4 and Trial 7) after

The microhardness of both the weld metals (without and with Ce containing) after austempering at 300 and 350°C for 1.5, 2 and 2.5 h holding time were taken at six different positions of the weld metal and the average of six considered final value. The average microhardness of the weld metals at both 300 and 350°C austempering temperature are plotted in **Figure 10** with respect to the holding time. **Figure 10** demonstrates that at 300°C both the weld metal shows higher hardness value than 350°C due to the variation of the amount of carbon enriched austenite. However, the hardness values are changed with changing the austempering holding time. In both the weld metals at both 300 and 350°C holding time changed from 1.5 to 2 h, the hardness values are decreased with increasing the amount of retained austenite. With increasing holding time from 2 to 2.5 h the hardness values are increased, with decreasing the amount of carbon enriched retained austenite in weld metals. At higher holding time the stage II reaction was started and the carbon enriched retained was diffused to bainitic ferrite and carbide, as a results the amount of retained austenite was decreased and the hardness value increased [41]. At both the austempering temperature of both weld metals at 2 h holding time attributed lower hardness value, the presence of higher amount of

Further, at each austempering conditions Ce containing weld metal shows lower hardness value due to higher amount of carbon enriched retained austenite in weld

> **Holding time (h)**

Trial 4 (without Ce) 300 2 20 211 327

Trial 7 (with Ce) 300 22 241 290

**Charpy impact (J)**

350 26 241 280

350 31 302 273

**Fatigue strength (MPa)**

**Microhardness (Hv)**

austempering at 300 and 350°C for 2 h holding time are given in **Table 4**.

. At 300°C austempering

**138**

**Table 4.**

*Variation of microhardness of weld metals at different holding time austempering at (a) 300°C and (b) 350°C using Trial 4 and Trial 7 electrodes.*

metal and attributed minimum hardness (273Hv) at 350°C for 2 h holding time presence of higher amount of retained austenite (46.7%) compared to without Ce content weld metal.

#### *3.2.2 Tensile test*

The transverse tensile tests of Trial 4 and Trial 7 weld joints after austempering at 300 and 350°C for 2 h holding time were carried out. For both the austempering conditions of both the weld metals failure of the test samples took place from the base metal as shown in **Figure 11**, indicating that weld metal is stronger than base metal. Thus the transverse tensile results show 100% joint efficiency of ADI weld metals (at 300 and 350°C for 2 h holding time) indicating successfully development of coated electrode and establishment of a weld procedure which could be applied commercially.

The tensile properties of ADI is strongly depends on the amount of retained austenite and its carbon content, the shape and size of bainitic ferrite and the numbers of graphite nodules presence in per unit area [42, 43]. At each austempering conditions both the weld metal attributed more amount of retained austenite and finer bainitic ferrite and smaller size of graphite nodules compare to base metal and HAZ. During tensile testing weld metal is possibly more strain hardened compare to base metal and HAZ due to presence of higher amount of retained austenite [43, 44]. It is well known that austenite having FCC structure possesses higher strain hardening rate than BCC ferrite (bainitic ferrite) and the strain hardening rate of austenite also increases with presence of carbon content [45]. Thus, one would expect, due to more amount of retained austenite along with higher carbon, that tensile strength of Ce containing weld metal would be higher than weld metal having without Ce at 350°C austempering temperature for 2 h holding time.

#### *3.2.3 Charpy impact test*

The average sub-size Charpy impact values of without and with Ce containing weld metals after austempering at 300 and 350°C for 2 h holding time are given in **Table 4**. The result states that the Charpy impact values are increased with increasing the austempering temperature from 300 to 350°C. The Charpy impact values are strongly depends on the amount of retained austenite, shape and size of bainitic

#### **Figure 11.**

*Transverse tensile samples after testing, austempering at (a1) 300°C, (a2) 350°C for 2 h using Trial 4 and (b1) 300°C, (b2) 350°C for 2 h using trial electrode.*

ferrite, graphite nodularity, size of the nodules and numbers of nodules presence in per unit area. Presence of higher carbon content in austenite the strain hardening rate of austenite is high and consequently more energy is being absorbed leading to increase in impact toughness [42, 43]. The higher nodularity could suppress the crack initiation due to lower stress concentration and increase in amount of graphite nodules could act as crack arrester during impact testing. Therefore, increasing the graphite nodularity of ADI can improved the high cycle fatigue strength. In both the weld metals at 350°C to attributed higher carbon enriched retained austenite to signify the higher impact values.

Furthermore Ce containing weld metal shows higher Charpy impact values at both the austempering temperature. Ce content in weld metal to refine the bainitic ferrite and retained austenite shape with increased the amount of retained austenite content, smaller the graphite nodules with higher nodularity indicates higher impact values. The highest impact value (31 J) was obtained at 350°C at Ce content weld metal presence of maximum amount (46%) of carbon enriched retained austenite.

The fracture surfaces of the freshly broken Charpy impact test specimens of both Trial 4 and Trial 7 after austempering at 300 and 350°C for 2 h holding time were examined under SEM in order to relate impact properties to operative fracture mechanism and are given in **Figure 12**. At 300°C both the weld metal (**Figure 12a** and **c**) fracture surface exhibits predominantly dimple and quasi-cleavage types fracture. However, at 350°C (**Figure 12b** and **d**) the fracture surface exhibits predominantly

#### **Figure 12.**

*Fracture surface of ADI weld metal austempering at (a) 300°C and (b) 350°C for 2 h using Trial 4 and (c) 300°C and (d) 350°C for 2 h using Trial 7 developed electrode.*

**141**

**Figure 13.**

*Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Austempered Ductile Iron Weld Joints Using Developed…*

dimple in nature ductile fracture of both the weld metals. The presence of Ce content in weld metal the sizes of the dimple are more fine and with changing the austempering temperature (300–350°C) the shape and size of dimple are more finer to indicate the higher impact value. It appears that extensive plastic flow around the graphite nodules results in stress concentration at graphite-matrix interface which leads to a decohesion between graphite nodules and the matrix. **Figure 12** illustrates the small graphite nodules within cavities or dimples that initiated the microvoids. Subsequent growth and coalescence of these microvoids produced dimple rupture network. The crack, which is likely to initiate near the graphite nodule, propagates through the matrix to reach the adjoining nodules. It is anticipated that plastic deformation in the matrix ahead of the regions of decohesion will thus be confined essentially to the soft ferrite regions [42] and the crack propagation becomes difficult across the tough austenite to join up with similar micro cracks in the neighboring ferrite needles. Therefore, one can expect improved toughness with increasing the volume fraction

The fatigue life of weld joints after austempering at 300 and 350°C using without and with Ce containing coated electrodes are represented through S-N curve in **Figure 13**. The S-N curve is drawn through the data point as best fit line and the

At lower (300°C) austempering temperature microstructure shows needle shape bainitic ferrite with lower amount of retained austenite to indicate higher tensile strength and hardness with lower impact toughness. However, at higher (350°C) austempering temperature microstructure shows coarser bainitic ferrite with higher amount of retained austenite to indicates lower tensile value and hardness with

stress cycle to called the endurance limit. The maximum strength obtained at 107 cycles is called the fatigue strength. In **Figure 13** illustrate that the fatigue strength of the weld joints were varied with varying the austempering temperature and respective weld metal composition. The maximum fatigue strength (302 MPa) was obtained at 350°C for with Ce weld metals due to higher toughness and lower tensile

cycle or more

arrows are indicates the samples did not fail before an excess of 107

strength and hardness of weld metal (**Table 4**).

higher impact toughness indicates higher fatigue strength.

*Comparison of S-N curve of high cycle fatigue test for Trial 4 and Trial 7 weld metals at different* 

*austempering conditions (arrow indicating the endurance limit of the each condition).*

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84763*

of retained austenite.

*3.2.4 High cycle fatigue analysis*

#### *Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Austempered Ductile Iron Weld Joints Using Developed… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84763*

dimple in nature ductile fracture of both the weld metals. The presence of Ce content in weld metal the sizes of the dimple are more fine and with changing the austempering temperature (300–350°C) the shape and size of dimple are more finer to indicate the higher impact value. It appears that extensive plastic flow around the graphite nodules results in stress concentration at graphite-matrix interface which leads to a decohesion between graphite nodules and the matrix. **Figure 12** illustrates the small graphite nodules within cavities or dimples that initiated the microvoids. Subsequent growth and coalescence of these microvoids produced dimple rupture network. The crack, which is likely to initiate near the graphite nodule, propagates through the matrix to reach the adjoining nodules. It is anticipated that plastic deformation in the matrix ahead of the regions of decohesion will thus be confined essentially to the soft ferrite regions [42] and the crack propagation becomes difficult across the tough austenite to join up with similar micro cracks in the neighboring ferrite needles. Therefore, one can expect improved toughness with increasing the volume fraction of retained austenite.

#### *3.2.4 High cycle fatigue analysis*

*Recent Advancements in the Metallurgical Engineering and Electrodeposition*

ferrite, graphite nodularity, size of the nodules and numbers of nodules presence in per unit area. Presence of higher carbon content in austenite the strain hardening rate of austenite is high and consequently more energy is being absorbed leading to increase in impact toughness [42, 43]. The higher nodularity could suppress the crack initiation due to lower stress concentration and increase in amount of graphite nodules could act as crack arrester during impact testing. Therefore, increasing the graphite nodularity of ADI can improved the high cycle fatigue strength. In both the weld metals at 350°C to attributed higher carbon enriched retained austenite to

*Transverse tensile samples after testing, austempering at (a1) 300°C, (a2) 350°C for 2 h using Trial 4 and* 

Furthermore Ce containing weld metal shows higher Charpy impact values at both the austempering temperature. Ce content in weld metal to refine the bainitic ferrite and retained austenite shape with increased the amount of retained austenite content, smaller the graphite nodules with higher nodularity indicates higher impact values. The highest impact value (31 J) was obtained at 350°C at Ce content weld metal presence of maximum amount (46%) of carbon enriched retained austenite. The fracture surfaces of the freshly broken Charpy impact test specimens of both Trial 4 and Trial 7 after austempering at 300 and 350°C for 2 h holding time were examined under SEM in order to relate impact properties to operative fracture mechanism and are given in **Figure 12**. At 300°C both the weld metal (**Figure 12a** and **c**) fracture surface exhibits predominantly dimple and quasi-cleavage types fracture. However, at 350°C (**Figure 12b** and **d**) the fracture surface exhibits predominantly

**140**

**Figure 12.**

*Fracture surface of ADI weld metal austempering at (a) 300°C and (b) 350°C for 2 h using Trial 4 and* 

*(c) 300°C and (d) 350°C for 2 h using Trial 7 developed electrode.*

signify the higher impact values.

*(b1) 300°C, (b2) 350°C for 2 h using trial electrode.*

**Figure 11.**

The fatigue life of weld joints after austempering at 300 and 350°C using without and with Ce containing coated electrodes are represented through S-N curve in **Figure 13**. The S-N curve is drawn through the data point as best fit line and the arrows are indicates the samples did not fail before an excess of 107 cycle or more stress cycle to called the endurance limit. The maximum strength obtained at 107 cycles is called the fatigue strength. In **Figure 13** illustrate that the fatigue strength of the weld joints were varied with varying the austempering temperature and respective weld metal composition. The maximum fatigue strength (302 MPa) was obtained at 350°C for with Ce weld metals due to higher toughness and lower tensile strength and hardness of weld metal (**Table 4**).

At lower (300°C) austempering temperature microstructure shows needle shape bainitic ferrite with lower amount of retained austenite to indicate higher tensile strength and hardness with lower impact toughness. However, at higher (350°C) austempering temperature microstructure shows coarser bainitic ferrite with higher amount of retained austenite to indicates lower tensile value and hardness with higher impact toughness indicates higher fatigue strength.

#### **Figure 13.**

*Comparison of S-N curve of high cycle fatigue test for Trial 4 and Trial 7 weld metals at different austempering conditions (arrow indicating the endurance limit of the each condition).*

The fatigue strength of ADI joints depended on the amount of retained austenite and its carbon content presence in ADI weld metals and the values are increased with increasing the amount of retained austenite content due to the higher strain hardening behavior of austenite [46]. Owing to the higher strain hardening behavior of austenite to delay the formation of persistent slip bands and reduces the nucleating of fatigue crack growth. However higher amount of retained austenite transformed to plastic induced martensite during high cycle fatigue test [26, 46, 47]. Such types of transformation was occurred at the plastic zones to ahead the fatigue crack and relax the stress concentration at the crack tip, as a result to reduce the fatigue crack growth rate and increase the fracture toughness.

However, the fatigue strength also depends on the shape and size of the bainitic ferrite, retained austenite and graphite nodules. The fatigue strength of ADI was improved when the nodule count was increased, in particular at austempered temperatures for higher toughness [26]. Therefore, ADI with a higher nodule count with the smaller size exhibits a better fatigue life [26]. The more pronounced graphite nodule size with higher optimum toughness to exhibits higher amount of retained austenite indicates maximum fatigue strength.

Presence of Ce content in weld metal illustrates higher fatigue strength than without Ce content weld metal. Ce content to refine the austenitic grain size also increasing the amount of retained austenite and its carbon content to illustrate the higher fatigue life. The smaller retained austenite grain size apparently creates more dislocation barrier; as a result the formation of precipitate slip band is more difficult and required more number of cycles to initiate the fatigue crack [14]. The maximum fatigue strength was obtained at 350°C at Ce containing weld metal, presence of maximum amount of retained austenite content (46.7%).

The fracture surface of welded fatigue test specimen after austempering at 300 and 350°C for 2 h holding time are analyzed by SEM studies and the fractographs are shown in **Figure 14**. In **Figure 14**, the fracture surface reveals ductile fracture with dimple formation also some cleavage fracture which is mostly

#### **Figure 14.**

*Fatigue fracture surface austempered ADI weld metals at (a) lower strength and (b) higher strength using Trial 4 electrode and (c) lower strength and (b) higher strength using Trial 7 electrode.*

**143**

grain boundary.

fatigue strength.

**Figure 15.**

the graphite nodules.

average growth of crack [49].

*Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Austempered Ductile Iron Weld Joints Using Developed…*

occurs in the vicinity of graphite nodules. The combination of ductile striation and cleavage plane whose river patterns go in to tear rivers is named as quasi cleavage [47]. At 300°C (**Figure 14a** and **c**) austempering temperature shoes mixture of dimple and quasi-cleavage fracture, however at 350°C shows (**Figure 14b** and **d**) fully dimple in nature feature is the dominant fracture mechanism to indicate ductile or transgranular in nature. Presence of Ce to refined the fracture surface and shows smaller size dimple in fracture surface and improved the

*Fatigue fracture at ADI weld metals indicating the crack initiation and crack propagation path.*

The fatigue crack (**Figure 15**) was initiated from the interface between the matrix and graphite nodules and crack path through the least resistance matrix phase due to the week interface bond between graphite and matrix also the lower elastic modulus of graphite. The crack path preferentially intersects with graphite nodules and there is an apparent crack branching mechanism to relate the cracknodule interactions. This mechanism is responsible for decreasing the fracture energy and reduce the crack propagation rate [48]. **Figure 15** shows, the fatigue crack was initiated comparatively larger size graphite nodules and propagates to the nearest graphite through the matrix surface. The graphite nodules are not perfectly spheroid and the interface between the matrix and graphite are irregulars with multiple sharp corner and high stress concentration to constitute crack that emanate from the graphite nodules [48]. However, the fatigue crack propagation path depends on the next graphite nodules ahead of the crack tip [48] and the crack front connect to the graphite nodules along to the crack path. At higher austempering temperature (350°C), decohesion of nodules and microcracks was observed around

It is important to note that several graphite nodules are involved with the growth of crack front, the shape size and distribution of the graphite nodules affects the

Previous investigators [17, 26, 50, 51] states the crack was initiated at the interface between the graphite nodules, and a matrix. However crack also may initiate defects presence in metal such as inclusion, shrinkage and irregular shaped of graphite nodules [52, 53]. The nucleation of the crack grows very rapidly after initiation of crack and decelerates due to the interaction of the matrix structure. The crack is strongly influenced by the microstructure in the crack path region and propagated through discontinuous manner due to the retardation of the matrix

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84763*

*Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Austempered Ductile Iron Weld Joints Using Developed… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84763*

**Figure 15.** *Fatigue fracture at ADI weld metals indicating the crack initiation and crack propagation path.*

occurs in the vicinity of graphite nodules. The combination of ductile striation and cleavage plane whose river patterns go in to tear rivers is named as quasi cleavage [47]. At 300°C (**Figure 14a** and **c**) austempering temperature shoes mixture of dimple and quasi-cleavage fracture, however at 350°C shows (**Figure 14b** and **d**) fully dimple in nature feature is the dominant fracture mechanism to indicate ductile or transgranular in nature. Presence of Ce to refined the fracture surface and shows smaller size dimple in fracture surface and improved the fatigue strength.

The fatigue crack (**Figure 15**) was initiated from the interface between the matrix and graphite nodules and crack path through the least resistance matrix phase due to the week interface bond between graphite and matrix also the lower elastic modulus of graphite. The crack path preferentially intersects with graphite nodules and there is an apparent crack branching mechanism to relate the cracknodule interactions. This mechanism is responsible for decreasing the fracture energy and reduce the crack propagation rate [48]. **Figure 15** shows, the fatigue crack was initiated comparatively larger size graphite nodules and propagates to the nearest graphite through the matrix surface. The graphite nodules are not perfectly spheroid and the interface between the matrix and graphite are irregulars with multiple sharp corner and high stress concentration to constitute crack that emanate from the graphite nodules [48]. However, the fatigue crack propagation path depends on the next graphite nodules ahead of the crack tip [48] and the crack front connect to the graphite nodules along to the crack path. At higher austempering temperature (350°C), decohesion of nodules and microcracks was observed around the graphite nodules.

It is important to note that several graphite nodules are involved with the growth of crack front, the shape size and distribution of the graphite nodules affects the average growth of crack [49].

Previous investigators [17, 26, 50, 51] states the crack was initiated at the interface between the graphite nodules, and a matrix. However crack also may initiate defects presence in metal such as inclusion, shrinkage and irregular shaped of graphite nodules [52, 53]. The nucleation of the crack grows very rapidly after initiation of crack and decelerates due to the interaction of the matrix structure. The crack is strongly influenced by the microstructure in the crack path region and propagated through discontinuous manner due to the retardation of the matrix grain boundary.

*Recent Advancements in the Metallurgical Engineering and Electrodeposition*

reduce the fatigue crack growth rate and increase the fracture toughness.

presence of maximum amount of retained austenite content (46.7%).

retained austenite indicates maximum fatigue strength.

The fatigue strength of ADI joints depended on the amount of retained austenite and its carbon content presence in ADI weld metals and the values are increased with increasing the amount of retained austenite content due to the higher strain hardening behavior of austenite [46]. Owing to the higher strain hardening behavior of austenite to delay the formation of persistent slip bands and reduces the nucleating of fatigue crack growth. However higher amount of retained austenite transformed to plastic induced martensite during high cycle fatigue test [26, 46, 47]. Such types of transformation was occurred at the plastic zones to ahead the fatigue crack and relax the stress concentration at the crack tip, as a result to

However, the fatigue strength also depends on the shape and size of the bainitic ferrite, retained austenite and graphite nodules. The fatigue strength of ADI was improved when the nodule count was increased, in particular at austempered temperatures for higher toughness [26]. Therefore, ADI with a higher nodule count with the smaller size exhibits a better fatigue life [26]. The more pronounced graphite nodule size with higher optimum toughness to exhibits higher amount of

Presence of Ce content in weld metal illustrates higher fatigue strength than without Ce content weld metal. Ce content to refine the austenitic grain size also increasing the amount of retained austenite and its carbon content to illustrate the higher fatigue life. The smaller retained austenite grain size apparently creates more dislocation barrier; as a result the formation of precipitate slip band is more difficult and required more number of cycles to initiate the fatigue crack [14]. The maximum fatigue strength was obtained at 350°C at Ce containing weld metal,

The fracture surface of welded fatigue test specimen after austempering at 300 and 350°C for 2 h holding time are analyzed by SEM studies and the fractographs are shown in **Figure 14**. In **Figure 14**, the fracture surface reveals ductile fracture with dimple formation also some cleavage fracture which is mostly

**142**

**Figure 14.**

*Fatigue fracture surface austempered ADI weld metals at (a) lower strength and (b) higher strength using* 

*Trial 4 electrode and (c) lower strength and (b) higher strength using Trial 7 electrode.*
