**11. Review results and comments**

The median estimate of residual drift obtained from the simplified analysis

The median demand estimates for peak transient drift ratio, peak floor acceleration, and residual drift ratio are input to PACT for direction 1 and direction 2 in the Structural Analysis Results tab (see **Figures 30** and **31**). Then, PACT uses this information to make damage state assessments for all building components

method is assigned a dispersion of 0.8.

*Natural Hazards - Impacts, Adjustments and Resilience*

**Figure 30.**

**Figure 31.**

**250**

*PACT residual drift tab.*

*PACT peak transient drift ratio input tab.*

**10. Input response and calculate performance**

As showed in the **Figure 32**, the estimated median repair cost is shown as \$2.710.445, which corresponds to 8.37% of the building's total replacement cost. From the isograph on the **Figure 32**, it is seen that the yellow stick representing the performance group B2022.001 (Curtain Walls - Generic Midrise Stick-Built Curtain wall, Config: Monolithic, Lamination: Unknown, Glass Type: Unknown,

**Figure 32.** *PACT repair cost tab.*

**Figure 33.** *PACT repair cost graph.*

**Figure 34***.* PACT Casualties/ Deaths Results*.*

**Figure 35.** *PACT casualties / injuries.*

Details: Aspect ratio = 6:5), explain its contribution to the most of the building total

**Figures 33, 34**, and **35** explain that 50% probability that repair cost will not

The performance results of the PACT can be examined in numerous ways. Viewing results by realization reveals that collapse plays a more significant role than residual drift (see **Figure 36**). For approximately 56 of the 200 realizations of the collapse of the component B1049.031 Post-tensioned concrete flat slabs-columns with shear reinforcing and, 40 of the 200 realization for the performance group B3011.011 Concrete tile roof tile secured and compliant for damage being judged

Performance assessment can provide useful information for many decisions associated with real property. These include: demonstrating equivalence of alternative design approaches, selecting appropriate design criteria for new buildings, determining if an existing building constitutes an acceptable risk for a particular planned use, whether or not it should be upgraded, and if so, to what level,

performing benefit–cost studies to determine a reasonable investment for improved seismic resistance in a building, determining whether or not insurance is a cost-

In this study, a case study of a typical hospital building has been analyzed. The non-linear static pushover analysis results have showed that the collapse occurs at the building base in Mode-8. The linear static analysis results have demonstrated a maximum roof displacement of 7.69 cm. Consequently, the performance assessment that used the data from these analyses have shown a low repair cost of 8.37% (less than 40%). Thus, based on the past knowledge and recommendations that suggests 40% of the total building replacement cost can be a reasonable threshold for total loss of several buildings, the decision of retrofitting can be given for this

The adaptation of the current study to the typical health-care facilities in many countries as Turkey is still on-going. It is believed that the results of this study will be valuable for the building owners, managers, insurance firms and for the process

Wilfrid Gbenankpon Djima, Abdullah Can Zulfikar and Cüneyt Tüzün

Department of Civil Engineering, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli, Turkey

© 2020 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,

repair cost with approximately \$1.700.000.

*Performance-Based Design for Healthcare Facilities DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95320*

exceed \$2.710.445, 145 injuries, 105 deaths.

effective risk management technique.

case study since the repair cost is less than 40%.

of benefit–cost performance and risk management.

\*Address all correspondence to: aczulfikar@gtu.edu.tr

provided the original work is properly cited.

irreparable.

**12. Conclusion**

**Author details**

**253**

**Figure 36.** *PACT repair cost tab with realizations.*

Details: Aspect ratio = 6:5), explain its contribution to the most of the building total repair cost with approximately \$1.700.000.

**Figures 33, 34**, and **35** explain that 50% probability that repair cost will not exceed \$2.710.445, 145 injuries, 105 deaths.

The performance results of the PACT can be examined in numerous ways. Viewing results by realization reveals that collapse plays a more significant role than residual drift (see **Figure 36**). For approximately 56 of the 200 realizations of the collapse of the component B1049.031 Post-tensioned concrete flat slabs-columns with shear reinforcing and, 40 of the 200 realization for the performance group B3011.011 Concrete tile roof tile secured and compliant for damage being judged irreparable.
