*Performance-Based Design for Healthcare Facilities DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95320*

**Table 3.**

*Lumped weight distribution + lateral forces and story drift ratio.*

**5. Non-structural components**

cies as shown in **Figure 13**.

building.

**238**

**Figure 12.**

**Table 2.**

**Figure 11.**

*PACT entries for 1st floor.*

The process of identifying and selecting the type and distribution of the nonstructural components can be greatly simplified using the *Normative Quantity Estimation Tool*, provided in Volume 3 of PACT. This tool can be used to generate a floor-by-floor listing of non-structural components with estimates of their performance group quantities with the simple input of building floor areas and occupan-

*PACT entries for 1st floor structural performance, direction1.Performance groups, direction 2.*

**Fragility Classification Number Direction Number Per Floor**

B1041.002a 1 4 B1041.002a 2 4 B1041.003b 1 6 B1041.003b 2 6

*Performance group quantities for reinforced concrete elements.*

*Natural Hazards - Impacts, Adjustments and Resilience*

To use the Normative Quantity Estimation Tool, the building floors and occupancies are entered into the Building Definition Table in the Normative Quantity Estimation Tab. **Figure 14** illustrates input of this information for the example

**Figure 15** [1] is an example of fragilities curves of reinforced concrete Special Moment Frame at different damage state details in [1] and **Figure 16 is** an example of fragility curves of different types of hospital non-structural equipment from [15]. The **Figures 17** and **18** show the overview of the in-site fragility description for

Special Moment Frame (SMF) and Electrical Equipment [1].


#### **Figure 13.**

*Normative quantity estimation tool, component summary matrix showing non-structural inventories.*


**Figure 14.** *Normative quantity estimation tool, building definition table.*

(**Figures 19** and **20**) and the SPO2IDA Tool in [1]. The building was modeled according to the Turkish Building Code 2018 for pushover static analysis in each building direction and the effective stiffness of reinforced concrete columns, beams

**Figure 21** illustrates the results of the pushover analysis for both building

Tool provided in [1] along with the building height (24.6 m or 80.71 feet), building weight (199235.85 kN or 44790.02 kips) and fundamental building period (1.96 seconds). Four control points are used to approximate the pushover

**Figure 23** present the results of the SPO2IDA evaluation. The value of ^

*Sa*(*T)* is

After then, the coordinates of the pushover curves are input to the SPO2IDA

and shear walls as defined in [6] Section 5 were applied.

direction 1 and direction 2, which are identical.

*B1041.002a SMF Beam-to-Column join fragility.*

curve as illustrated in **Figure 22**.

estimated as 1.16 g.

**241**

**Figure 16.**

**Figure 17.**

*Fragility curves as a function of earthquake PGA.*

*Performance-Based Design for Healthcare Facilities DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95320*

**Figure 15.** *Example fragility of SMF.*
