**Author details**

Jorge Luis Pérez Medina\*, Patricia Acosta-Vargas and Yves Rybarczyk Intelligent and Interactive Systems Lab (SI2 Lab), Universidad de Las Américas (UDLA), Quito, Ecuador

\*Address all correspondence to: jorge.perez.medina@udla.edu.ec

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**45**

*A Systematic Review of Usability and Accessibility in Tele-Rehabilitation Systems*

use. Telemedicine and e-Health.

[10] Barriga A, Conejero J, Hernández J, Jurado E, Moguel E, Sánchez-Figueroa F. A vision-based approach for building telecare and telerehabilitation services.

[11] Lathan CE, Kinsella A, Rosen MJ, Winters J, Trepagnier C. Aspects of human factors engineering in home telemedicine and telerehabilitation systems. Telemedicine Journal.

[12] Brennan DM, Barker LM. Human factors in the development and implementation of telerehabilitation systems. Journal of Telemedicine and

[13] Pérez-Medina JL, Vanderdonckt J. A tool for multi-surface collaborative sketching. In: WorkShop Cross-Surface 2016: Third International Workshop on Interacting with Multi-Device Ecologies

[14] Pérez-Medina JL, Vanderdonckt

collaboration. In: Rocha Á. PM, Ferrás C, editors. Information Technology and Systems., Advances. Cham: Springer;

[15] Kieffer S, Ghouti A, Macq B. The agile ux development lifecycle:

Combining formative usability and agile

J. Sketching by cross-surface

[16] Whitworth E, Lewis JA, Boian R, Tremaine M, Burdea G, Deutsch JE. Formative evaluation of a virtual reality telerehabilitation system for the lower extremity. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation (IWVR2003); Piscataway, NJ, USA.

2015;**21**(10):808-813

Sensors. 2016;**16**(10):1724

Telecare. 2008;**14**(2):55-58

1999;**5**(2):169-175

"in the wild". 2016

2019. pp. 386-397

methods. 2017

2003. pp. 21-22

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85869*

[1] Flodgren G, Rachas A, Farmer A, Inzitari M, Shepperd S. Interactive telemedicine: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. 2015

[2] Parmanto B, Saptono A. Telerehabilitation: State-of-the-art from an informatics perspective. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 2009;**1**(1):

[3] Peretti A, Amenta F, Tayebati SK, Nittari G, Mahdi SS. Telerehabilitation: Review of the state-of-the-art and areas of application. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies. 2017;**4**(2):e7

[4] Rogante M, Grigioni M, Cordella D, Giacomozzi C. Ten years of telerehabilitation: A literature overview of technologies and clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation.

[5] Rybarczyk Y, Kleine Deters J, Cointe C, Esparza D. Smart webbased platform to support physical rehabilitation. Sensors. 2018;**18**(5):1344

[6] Rybarczyk Y et al. Implementation and assessment of an intelligent motor tele-rehabilitation platform. Electronics.

[7] McCue M, Fairman A, Pramuka M. Enhancing quality of life through telerehabilitation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 2010;**21**(1):195-205

[8] Rollnik JD, Pohl M, Mokrusch T, Wallesch CW. Telerehabilitation kann die klassische neurologische rehabilitation nicht ersetzen. Nervenarzt. 2017;**88**(10):1192-1193

[9] Jansen-Kosterink S, in't Veld RH, Hermens H, Vollenbroek-Hutten M. A telemedicine service as partial replacement of face-to-face physical rehabilitation: The relevance of

2010;**27**(4):287-304

2019;**8**(1):58

**References**

73-84

*A Systematic Review of Usability and Accessibility in Tele-Rehabilitation Systems DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85869*
