2.5.1.1 Calibration

The calibration is done by comparing the average of response time to questionnaires by presenting sound voice or letters obtained in prototype experiments in the first and the second time, divided by the number of words.

2.5.2 Qualitative analyses

Comparison of elements between emotion and non-emotion.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89681

collaborative learning.

3.1 Prototype experiment

3. Results

Figure 7.

59

presented by letters).

Table 3.

After processing parallel distributions of individual traits of information processing (Tables 1 and 2), descriptions of answering questionnaires about psychological testing will be compared between two types of presentation and interpersonal communication in class or practical training (Team B and Team C).

Dual Loop Theory: Eidetic Feedback Control and Predictive Feedback Control

Then, their differences will be discussed in order to clarify the effectiveness of

Twenty-eight participants were the same members as the first and the second implementation on the same seat and the same display for each person. The experiments were conducted by representing counter-balanced by order. The results were obtained by analyzing the average of reaction time divided by number of words in a short sentence (Figure 7); both sound voice and letters were not significantly different between the first and the second experiments. The total average (first, second) of sound voice was (=2.69, =2.58) and letters (=2.32, =2.20). The correlation coefficients between response time and the number of words were not

From these results, it has been proved with reliability that the level of calibration

Comparison of response time between the first and the second experiments (left: presented by sound voice; right:

significantly different between the first and the second experiments, both

was high enough to reproduce scientifically, regarding our measuring system. Concerning standard deviation, however, letters (SD = 0.93, SD = 0.85) was larger than sound voice (SD = 0.64, SD = 0.64) (Figure 5). Specifically, when the number of words was higher, the standard deviation of reaction time to letters became

representing questionnaires by sound voice and letters (Table 4).
