6. The final comparisons

We can constant that each of the objects (train and bus stations) has a different exterior security coefficient in contrast with the shopping centers. We can see this contrast in Figure 9.

As we can see in Figure 10, the difference between the average values is significant. The average value of the exterior coefficient in the shopping centers is 4.49. The average value of the exterior coefficient in the train and bus station is 1.75. As we can see on the right side of the figure, the train and bus station has significant differences in the two cases. Object 21 and object 14 are the objects that have not been analyzed correctly. The analyst analyzes only one part of the station. In these two cases, we do not use the average value. We can constant that each of the objects (train and bus stations) has the different exterior security coefficient in contrast with the shopping centers. We can see this contrast in Figure 10.

As we can see in the right side of Figure 11, object 14 (train and bus station in Frýdek-Místek) is not correctly analyzed. We cannot use these results as the correct

Figure 11.

The final comparison between the train and bus stations and shopping centers.

data. On the other hand, object 8 is the second best security coefficient. This object is correctly analyzed. We can see that the average value of this analysis is 3.73. On the other hand, the average value of the analysis of the shopping center is 5.04. We can say that the analysis corresponds to the reality because open-space objects will have a significant difference in security situations.
