**Author details**

Oytun Sözüdoğru1 \* and Nazime Tuncay2

1 University of City Island, Famagusta, Northern Cyprus

2 Cyprus Science University, Kyrenia, Northern Cyprus

\*Address all correspondence to: oytun.sozudogru@adakent.edu.tr

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**109**

*Using Wearable Devices in Educational Assessment: Smartphone Exams*

[9] Robbins SP. Organisational

thehindu.in

pp. 587-596

University; 2007

2009;**12**(3):82-97

2005

Behaviour: Concepts, Controversies and Applications. NJ: Prentice Hall; 1998

[10] George SB. Towards Innovative Pedagogy. The Hindu: Education Plus; 2014. Available from: http://www.

[11] Litchfield AJ, Dyson LE, Lawrence

E, Zmijewska A. Directions for m-learning research to enhance active learning. In: ICT: Providing Choices for Learners and Learning: Proceedings

Ascilite Singapore 2007. 2007.

[12] Oran KM, Karadeniz Ş. İnternet tabanlı uzaktan eğitimde mobil öğrenmenin rolü. In: Academic Bilişim'07—IX. Academic Computing Conference Proceedings; 31 January-2 February 2007. Kütahya: Dumlupınar

[13] Vavoula G, Sharples M. Lifelong learning organisers: Requirements for tools for supporting episodic and semantic learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society.

[14] Sharples M, Taylor J, Vavoula G. Towards a theory of mobile learning. In: Proceedings of m Learn 2005 Conference; Cape Town, South Africa.

[15] Hoven D. Designing for disruption: Remodelling a blended course in technology in (language) teacher education. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education "Who's Learning? Whose Technology?". Sydney: Sydney University Press; 2006. pp. 339-349

[16] Aker JC, Ksoll C, Lybbert TJ. Can mobile phones improve learning? Evidence from a field experiment in

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84324*

[1] Noah A, Spierer DK, Gu J, Bronner S. Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology. 2013;**7**(7):456-462. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

**References**

pubmed/24007317

2018]

[2] Shantz JAS, Veillette C. The application of wearable technology in surgery: Ensuring the positive impact of the wearable revolution on surgical patients. Frontiers in Surgery. 2014;**1**(39):1-4. Available from: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC4286964/pdf/fsurg-01-00039.pdf

[3] Walker S, Roashan R. Wearable Technology: The Small Revolution is Making Big Waves. 2018. Available from: https://technology.ihs.com/api/ binary/526640 [Accessed: December 15,

[4] Puri A. Acceptance and usage of smart wearable devices in Canadian older adults, a thesis presented to the Public Health and Health Systems. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: University of Waterloo; 2017

[5] Goulimaris D. The relation between distance education Students' motivation and satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 2015;**16**(2)

[6] Harrison JM, Blakemore CL, Buck MM, Pellett TL. Instructional Strategies for Secondary School Physical Education. 4th ed. Dubuque, IA: Brown

[7] Hoy WK, Miskel CG. Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd ed. New York: Random

[8] Weinberg RS, Gould D. Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2003

& Benchmark; 1996

House; 1982

*Using Wearable Devices in Educational Assessment: Smartphone Exams DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84324*
