**Author details**

Otávio José de Oliveira1 \*, Fabio Francisco da Silva2 , Fernando Juliani1 , Luis César Ferreira Motta Barbosa1 and Thaís Vieira Nunhes1

1 São Paulo State University, Guaratinguetá, Brazil

2 Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Goiás, Valparaíso de Goiás, Brazil

\*Address all correspondence to: otaviodeoliveira@uol.com.br

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**65**

*Bibliometric Method for Mapping the State-of-the-Art and Identifying Research Gaps…*

Measuring the impact of methodological

[9] Abrizah A, Zainab AN, Kiran K, Raj RG. LIS journals scientific impact

Science and Scopus. Scientometrics.

[10] Bartol T, Budimir G, Dekleva-Smrekar D, Pusnik M, Juznic P.

and Web of Science in the view ofnational research evaluation in Slovenia. Scientometrics. 2014;**98**:1491- 1504. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1148-8

[11] Juliani F, Oliveira OJ. State of research on public service management: Identifying scientific gaps from a bibliometric study. International Journal of Information Management. 2016;**36**:1033-1041. DOI: 10.1016/j.

[12] Filser L, Silva FF, Oliveira OJ. State

of research and future research tendencies in lean healthcare: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics.

[13] Nunhes TV, Motta LCF,

Oliveira OJ. Evolution of integrated management systems research on the Journal of Cleaner Production: Identification of contributions and gaps in the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;**139**:1234-1244

[14] Garza-reys JA. Lean and green—A systematic review of the state of the art literature. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015;**102**:18-29

[15] Scopus [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.scopus.com

[Accessed: 2018-01-02]

ijinfomgt.2016.07.003

2017;**112**:799-816

Assessment of research fields in Scopus

and subject categorization: A comparison between Web of

2013;**94**:721-740

research: A framework and methods to identify evidence of impact. Trials. 2014;**15**:1-7. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-464

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85856*

[1] Dragos CM, Dragos SL. Bibliometric approach of factors affecting scientific productivity in environmental sciences and ecology. Science of the Total Environment. 2013;**449**:184-188. DOI:

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.057

**References**

[2] Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L. Scientometrics in a changing research landscape. Science & Society. 2014;**15**:1228-1231. DOI: https://10.15252/embr.201439608

[3] Gumpenberger C, Wieland M, Gorraiz J. Bibliometric practices and activities at the University of Vienna. Library Management. 2012;**33**:74-183. DOI: 10.1108/01435121211217199

[4] Campbell D, Picard-Aitken M, Côté G, Caruso J, Valentim R, Edmonds S, et al. Bibliometrics as a performance measurement tool for research evaluation: The case of research funded by the national cancer institute of Canada. American Journal of Evaluation. 2010;**31**:66-83. DOI: 10.1177/1098214009354774

[5] Vogel R. What happened to the public organization? A Bibliometric Analysis of public administration and organization studies. American Review of Public Administration. 2014;**44**:383- 408. DOI: 10.1177/0275074012470867

[6] Gläser J, Laudel G. A bibliometric reconstruction of research trails for qualitative investigations of scientific innovations. Historical Social Research. 2015;**40**:299-330. DOI: 10.12759/

[7] Bornmann L. How are excellent (highly cited) papers defined in bibliometrics? A quantitative analysis of the literature. Research Evaluation. 2014;**23**:166-173.

hsr.40.2015.3.299-330

DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvu002

[8] Brueton VC, Vale CL, Choodari-Oskooei B, Jinks R, Tierney JF.

*Bibliometric Method for Mapping the State-of-the-Art and Identifying Research Gaps… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85856*
