Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes

*Vladimir Samuilov, Jean Galibert and Nikolai Poklonski*

## **Abstract**

The assemblies (films) of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) possess very stable, reproducible, and extraordinary electronic properties. These films have been considered as attractive materials for various nanosensors and as electrodes of electrochemical energy storage devices, like supercapacitors, with low equivalent series resistance and highly developed internal surface. In order to develop CNT devices operating at the room temperature, it was necessary to determine the assembled films' properties, such as the mechanism of conductivity, carrier concentration, and mobility. In this study, we are focused on the assemblies (monolayers, arrays, and films) of multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT). We applied a wide temperature range resistance and magnetoresistance as a tool to determine the transport characteristics of MWCNT films. The measurements of the electrical transport (temperature dependence of the resistance) in the assemblies of nanotubes were tested in the temperature range T = 1.5–300 K, and the magnetoresistance measurements were carried out in pulsed magnetic fields up to 35 tesla in the temperature range 1.5–300 K. The mechanisms responsible for the transport in these systems, including weak localization, antilocalization, Luttinger liquid, Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations, and intertube coupling, were observed.

**Keywords:** films of carbon nanotubes, MWCNT, temperature dependence of resistance, magnetoresistance, localization

## **1. Introduction**

Since their discovery [1], carbon nanotubes revealed remarkable properties, which made them as an attractive material in broad domain of applications [2–4]. In carbon nanotube electronics [5, 6], they were expected to be used as the components of nanostructured field effect transistors [5, 7–9]. Their high anisotropic shape is considered to be useful for low field emission displays. Carbon nanotubes exhibited unique mechanical properties. Their huge elastic modulus (~1 TPa) [10, 11] and their large surface area per volume made them good candidates, respectively, for composite materials [12] and lithium ion storage [13], for sustainable energy supplies, and for gas [14], chemical [15, 16], and bio [17–21] sensors.

The electrical transport properties are the most important for a number of applications of carbon nanotubes. Usually, singletube samples are used for electrical transport studies. The kinetic inductance of individual nanotubes contributes to the lowfrequency impedance of fibers composed of SWCNTs (at cryogenic temperatures and a constant electric bias) [22, 23]. Quantum transport properties have been observed both in singlewall (SWCNT) [5, 9, 24–29] and multiwall nanotubes (MWCNT) [3, 30–35].

Quantum interference effects, such as weak localization (WL), the Aharonov– Bohm (AB) effect, the Al'tshuler–Aronov–Spivak (AAS) effect, and universal conductance fluctuations (UCF), have previously been observed in multiwalled carbon nanotubes [32]. Knowledge of phasebreaking effects in coherent transport is very important for the study of these quantum interference phenomena. The temperature (*T*) dependence of the phase coherence length, *L*φ, of MWCNTs has been reported to follow a power law dependence of *T*<sup>−</sup>1/3, a characteristic of onedimensional interference [36]. In the case of singlewalled CNTs, the power law dependence also shows a *T*<sup>−</sup>1/3 dependence [28]. In addition, as further evidence of lowdimensional transport, there are some experimental reports of Tomonaga– Luttinger liquid behavior in CNTs [37].

From one point of view, for the array (assemblies) of nanotube samples, the synergetic properties were expected only [38]. But, the transport in the arrays of nanotubes was found to show single nanotube properties at low temperatures due to the mostly conductive nanotubes responsible for the transport [25]. On the other hand, for specific new applications, like chemical [15, 16] and bio [17–21] sensors, the synergetic properties of the arrays of nanotube samples are important [39]. They are based on their large surface area per volume and intertube coupling in electrical transport in the arrays of nanotubes [40].

The examples of different morphologies of the samples of arrays of nanotubes involve definitions of bundles (ropes) [32, 38, 41–43], mats [44, 45], networks [46, 47], and films [48]. Some of them were manufactured using hardly controlled deposition from an organic solvent dispersion of pristine nanotubes [49].

The Langmuir–Blodgett (LB) technique was found to be a method for depositing defectfree, molecularly ordered ultrathin films with controlled thickness and orientation. Since pristine nanotubes are nonsoluble in many kinds of organic solvents, it is impossible to form LB films directly from nanotubes. The LB monolayer of SWCNTs by dispersing them in a surfactant was obtained on a solid substrate in [50–52]. However, due to their limited dispersibility, the concentration of nanotubes in the layer was quite low (<7%), and the control of the tube orientation was not achieved by this method. The LB film of SWCNTs grafted by polyethylene oxide (PEO) was realized [53]. However, due to the soft PEO film covering the top surface of SWCNT cores, the low collapse pressure (~15 mN/m) was achieved. It became clear that, for the formation of a monolayer of carbon nanotubes using the LB technique, chemical modification of nanotubes is required.

The organic functionalization of carbon nanotubes has been realized [54–56]. But, to our knowledge, there was no experimental data on electrical and magnetotransport properties' characterization of dense monolayers manufactured using LB assembling of functionalized nanotubes. This method is expected to be used for obtaining the layers of very dense arrays of nanotubes for using them for new applications in chemical and biosensors, controlled by electrical transport.

**145**

**Figure 1.**

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes*

**2. Pristine MWCNT (no modification/functionalization)**

We describe the methods of modification and assembly of CNTs and the specificity of the electrical transport in the layers in respect to the technological

The purified MWCNTs were dissolved in chloroform/chlorobenzene mixture

Between 4.2 and 70 K, the zero magnetic field resistance (**Figure 1**) exhibited a behavior as *R* ∝ *R*0 + *AT*−α, where α = 0.38, while in the range 60–300 K, the resis-

As a power law can fit the temperature dependence of the resistance, the formation of a Luttinger liquid in which the transport is managed by coherent backscattering effects could be suggested [35]. Similar power law temperature dependence

With the magnetic field B perpendicular to the plane of our sample, a negative magnetoresistance (NMR) is observed in the whole range of magnetic fields and in the temperatures between 1.8 and 80 K, with a tendency to a saturation at high

Also, the magnetoresistance shows some oscillations in the magnetic field up to 30 T, at 1.8 K, as it can be seen in **Figure 2**. At higher temperatures these oscillations tend to vanish. The oscillations can be attributed to the Shubnikov–de Haas (SdH)

A maximum occurs in the resistance at magnetic field *Bn* when the Fermi energy *E*F crosses a quantized energy level *En* in the field. In graphene [57],

*Temperature dependence of the resistance of an array of pristine MWCNT sample. In the insets, the* 

*dependence R(T) is shown in the low and high temperature range.*

with the same exponent was found earlier in SWCNT samples [25, 26].

oscillations. They are clearly seen without background subtraction.

sonication. A droplet of this solution was spread on the water surface, and after evaporation of the solvent, an array of MWCNT was collected on the substrate with inplane macroscopic fingershaped electrodes. The resistance was measured as a function of temperature and magnetic field in the Laboratoire National des Champs Magnetiques Intenses de Toulouse in the range 1.8–300 K and up to 35 T. We review here the most typical features of our results obtained on these nonfunctionalized

mg/ml of visually nonscattered solution after

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

with the concentration up to 10<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>

selfassembled arrays of MWCNT.

tance behaved like *R* ∝ *R*0*′* + *BT*<sup>−</sup>1/3.

magnetic fields.

approach utilized.

We utilized assembly of different carbon nanotubes in the layers:


*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

*Perspective of Carbon Nanotubes*

(MWCNT) [3, 30–35].

Luttinger liquid behavior in CNTs [37].

electrical transport in the arrays of nanotubes [40].

the lowfrequency impedance of fibers composed of SWCNTs (at cryogenic temperatures and a constant electric bias) [22, 23]. Quantum transport properties have been observed both in singlewall (SWCNT) [5, 9, 24–29] and multiwall nanotubes

Quantum interference effects, such as weak localization (WL), the Aharonov– Bohm (AB) effect, the Al'tshuler–Aronov–Spivak (AAS) effect, and universal conductance fluctuations (UCF), have previously been observed in multiwalled carbon nanotubes [32]. Knowledge of phasebreaking effects in coherent transport is very important for the study of these quantum interference phenomena. The temperature (*T*) dependence of the phase coherence length, *L*φ, of MWCNTs has been reported to follow a power law dependence of *T*<sup>−</sup>1/3, a characteristic of onedimensional interference [36]. In the case of singlewalled CNTs, the power law dependence also shows a *T*<sup>−</sup>1/3 dependence [28]. In addition, as further evidence of lowdimensional transport, there are some experimental reports of Tomonaga–

From one point of view, for the array (assemblies) of nanotube samples, the synergetic properties were expected only [38]. But, the transport in the arrays of nanotubes was found to show single nanotube properties at low temperatures due to the mostly conductive nanotubes responsible for the transport [25]. On the other hand, for specific new applications, like chemical [15, 16] and bio [17–21] sensors, the synergetic properties of the arrays of nanotube samples are important [39]. They are based on their large surface area per volume and intertube coupling in

The examples of different morphologies of the samples of arrays of nanotubes involve definitions of bundles (ropes) [32, 38, 41–43], mats [44, 45], networks [46, 47], and films [48]. Some of them were manufactured using hardly controlled

The Langmuir–Blodgett (LB) technique was found to be a method for depositing defectfree, molecularly ordered ultrathin films with controlled thickness and orientation. Since pristine nanotubes are nonsoluble in many kinds of organic solvents, it is impossible to form LB films directly from nanotubes. The LB monolayer of SWCNTs by dispersing them in a surfactant was obtained on a solid substrate in [50–52]. However, due to their limited dispersibility, the concentration of nanotubes in the layer was quite low (<7%), and the control of the tube orientation was not achieved by this method. The LB film of SWCNTs grafted by polyethylene oxide (PEO) was realized [53]. However, due to the soft PEO film covering the top surface of SWCNT cores, the low collapse pressure (~15 mN/m) was achieved. It became clear that, for the formation of a monolayer of carbon nanotubes using the

The organic functionalization of carbon nanotubes has been realized [54–56]. But, to our knowledge, there was no experimental data on electrical and magnetotransport properties' characterization of dense monolayers manufactured using LB assembling of functionalized nanotubes. This method is expected to be used for obtaining the layers of very dense arrays of nanotubes for using them for new applications in chemical and biosensors, controlled by electrical transport. We utilized assembly of different carbon nanotubes in the layers:

deposition from an organic solvent dispersion of pristine nanotubes [49].

LB technique, chemical modification of nanotubes is required.

• Pristine (nonmodified) CNTs.

• Modified by organic chemical functionalization.

• Oxidized CNTs in the solution of sulfuric and nitric acids.

**144**

We describe the methods of modification and assembly of CNTs and the specificity of the electrical transport in the layers in respect to the technological approach utilized.

## **2. Pristine MWCNT (no modification/functionalization)**

The purified MWCNTs were dissolved in chloroform/chlorobenzene mixture with the concentration up to 10<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup> mg/ml of visually nonscattered solution after sonication. A droplet of this solution was spread on the water surface, and after evaporation of the solvent, an array of MWCNT was collected on the substrate with inplane macroscopic fingershaped electrodes. The resistance was measured as a function of temperature and magnetic field in the Laboratoire National des Champs Magnetiques Intenses de Toulouse in the range 1.8–300 K and up to 35 T. We review here the most typical features of our results obtained on these nonfunctionalized selfassembled arrays of MWCNT.

Between 4.2 and 70 K, the zero magnetic field resistance (**Figure 1**) exhibited a behavior as *R* ∝ *R*0 + *AT*−α, where α = 0.38, while in the range 60–300 K, the resistance behaved like *R* ∝ *R*0*′* + *BT*<sup>−</sup>1/3.

As a power law can fit the temperature dependence of the resistance, the formation of a Luttinger liquid in which the transport is managed by coherent backscattering effects could be suggested [35]. Similar power law temperature dependence with the same exponent was found earlier in SWCNT samples [25, 26].

With the magnetic field B perpendicular to the plane of our sample, a negative magnetoresistance (NMR) is observed in the whole range of magnetic fields and in the temperatures between 1.8 and 80 K, with a tendency to a saturation at high magnetic fields.

Also, the magnetoresistance shows some oscillations in the magnetic field up to 30 T, at 1.8 K, as it can be seen in **Figure 2**. At higher temperatures these oscillations tend to vanish. The oscillations can be attributed to the Shubnikov–de Haas (SdH) oscillations. They are clearly seen without background subtraction.

A maximum occurs in the resistance at magnetic field *Bn* when the Fermi energy *E*F crosses a quantized energy level *En* in the field. In graphene [57],

**Figure 1.**

*Temperature dependence of the resistance of an array of pristine MWCNT sample. In the insets, the dependence R(T) is shown in the low and high temperature range.*

**Figure 2.**

*Transverse magnetoresistance at 1.8 K shows some oscillations in the magnetic field up to 30 T. In the inset the magnetoresistance dependences at T = 4.2 K and at T = 77 K show no significant oscillations. The maxima of resistance oscillations are labeled with n and plotted as a function of 1/Bn in a Landau plot in the second inset.*

*En*(*B*) = √(2*neBv*<sup>0</sup> 2 ) [58] and *Bn* = *B*0/*n*, where *B*0 = *E*<sup>F</sup> 2 /(2*ev*0*ħ*<sup>2</sup> ) = *ħk*<sup>F</sup> 2 /2*e*. Each maximum is labeled with *n* and plotted as a function of 1/*Bn* in a Landau plot (inset of **Figure 2**). The wellidentified peaks (*n* = 1–6) define a straight line. From the slope we determine *k*F and *ns* = 4*k*<sup>F</sup> 2 /4*π* ≈ 1.9 × 1012 cm−<sup>2</sup> , which is consistent with the experiment [59].

At this stage of our investigation in these samples, we intend to suggest some explanation of the behavior of the NMR. The transverse NMR has been observed at low magnetic field with a superposition of some aperiodic oscillations consistent with the universal conductance fluctuations (UCF) [3, 30]. From a classical point of view, the interference term leading to UCF originates from adding the probability amplitudes of all paths that connect the source and drain. The NMR at low field is caused by interference contributions due to closed electron trajectories, which add up constructively at zero magnetic field; that could be considered as the definition of WL [60]. A correct treatment would need the use of the digamma functions [61, 62].

While WL is expected to decay slower with the temperature than UCF, a study of the NMR at different temperatures will allow us to discriminate from these two processes. If not, it will signify that the fluctuations could be due to the band structure of the ensemble of nanotubes and might be caused by magnetic depopulation of a onedimensional subband, a phenomenon which, in extended thin films, gives rise to SdH oscillations [60].

It must be noticed that the MWCNT in our samples were not arranged as a film but rather form a "carpet" which, under some conditions, should be considered as a 2DEG. In the MWCNT films, the NMR was observed also at low magnetic fields [48], followed by a positive magnetoresistance (PMR), till 12 T. It was argued that the NMR may come from (i) quantum interference [63, 64], (ii) thermal fluctuationinduced tunneling [65], or (iii) Landau levels in disordered graphite [66]. In our case, as the NMR was observed till 25 T and at low temperature, the hypotheses (i) and (ii) can be rejected. As far as the Landau levels, or SdH oscillations [3], could be considered, we notice that the oscillations observed in our experiments appear to be mainly periodic in 1/*B* (in contradiction with which was observed in [3, 30]) and might be related to the SdH oscillations.

As a result, in this section, we report the experiments on temperature and magnetic field dependence of the resistance of selfassembled assemblies of pristine

**147**

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes*

**3. Chemically functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes**

with inplane electrodes for electrical and magnetotransport testing.

MWCNT, in which we attribute the NMR in terms of WL and interpreted the oscil-

The electrical transport properties are the most important for a number of applications of carbon nanotubes. Usually, singletube samples are used for electrical transport studies. Quantum transport properties have been obtained both in singlewall (SWCNT) [5, 9, 24–28] and multiwall nanotubes (MWCNT) [3, 30–35]. For the nanotube array samples, only mean values of the characteristic parameters were expected [38]. But, in some cases, the transport in the arrays of nanotubes was found to show single nanotube properties at low temperatures due to the mostly conductive nanotubes responsible for the transport [25]. On the other hand, for the specific applications, like chemical [15, 16] and bio [17–21] sensors, the synergetic properties of the arrays of nanotube samples are important. They are based on their large surface area per volume and intertube coupling in electrical transport in the

We have shown experimentally that chemically functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes could be assembled into 2D layers (dense arrays) covering large surfaces

In contrast to the standard morphologies of the samples of arrays of nanotubes involving definitions of bundles (ropes), mats, networks, etc., based on hardly controlled deposition from an organic solvent dispersion of pristine nanotubes, we use the LB technique for chemically functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes. The method we propose offers a radical departure from the existing methodology due to the possibility of covering large surfaces with dense and defectfree, molecularly

The electrical and magnetotransport properties in the assembled monolayers of

The MWCNTs produced by chemical vapor decomposition (CVD) with catalyst

Organic functionalization of MWCNTs was based on the scheme described in [69]. The purified MWCNTs were suspended in N,Ndimethylformamide [DMF] HCON(CH3)2 together with excess *p*anisaldehyde (4methoxybenzaldehyde) CH3OC6H4CHO and 3methylhippuric acid [mtoluric acid, N(3methylbenzoyl)

on FTIR spectra (**Figures 5** and **6**), we conclude that the

Heterogeneous mixture was heated at 130°C for 3 days. The scheme of the reaction is described in **Figure 3**. After the reaction was stopped, the organic phase was separated from unreacted material by centrifugation and washing five times with chloroform (CHCl3) and vacuum drying. The obtained dark solid phase was easily soluble in CHCl3 up to a few mg/ml without sonication. The functionalized nanotubes were tested by HRTEM (**Figure 4**) and FTIR (**Figure 5**) methods. Due to the distinct layer on the surface of the nanotubes, observed by HRTEM (**Figure 4**), which is responsible for the absorption peaks in 1400–1500 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>

The organic functionalization of carbon nanotubes had been realized [54–56, 67–69]. But, to our knowledge, up to now, the experimental data on electrical and magnetotransport properties' characterization of dense monolayers manufactured using LB assembling of functionalized nanotubes is very limited. This method is expected to be used for obtaining the layers of very dense arrays of nanotubes for utilizing them for new applications in chemical and biosensors, controlled by

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

lations in terms of SdH behavior.

arrays of nanotubes [40].

thin films of carbon nanotubes.

5% FeCo/CaCO3 were utilized.

glycine] CH3C6H4CONHCH2CO2H.

electrical transport.

and 1800–1900 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>

carbon nanotubes have been tested.

*En*(*B*) = √(2*neBv*<sup>0</sup>

**Figure 2.**

functions [61, 62].

rise to SdH oscillations [60].

might be related to the SdH oscillations.

2

consistent with the experiment [59].

From the slope we determine *k*F and *ns* = 4*k*<sup>F</sup>

) [58] and *Bn* = *B*0/*n*, where *B*0 = *E*<sup>F</sup>

maximum is labeled with *n* and plotted as a function of 1/*Bn* in a Landau plot (inset of **Figure 2**). The wellidentified peaks (*n* = 1–6) define a straight line.

*Transverse magnetoresistance at 1.8 K shows some oscillations in the magnetic field up to 30 T. In the inset the magnetoresistance dependences at T = 4.2 K and at T = 77 K show no significant oscillations. The maxima of resistance oscillations are labeled with n and plotted as a function of 1/Bn in a Landau plot in the second inset.*

At this stage of our investigation in these samples, we intend to suggest some explanation of the behavior of the NMR. The transverse NMR has been observed at low magnetic field with a superposition of some aperiodic oscillations consistent with the universal conductance fluctuations (UCF) [3, 30]. From a classical point of view, the interference term leading to UCF originates from adding the probability amplitudes of all paths that connect the source and drain. The NMR at low field is caused by interference contributions due to closed electron trajectories, which add up constructively at zero magnetic field; that could be considered as the definition of WL [60]. A correct treatment would need the use of the digamma

While WL is expected to decay slower with the temperature than UCF, a study of the NMR at different temperatures will allow us to discriminate from these two processes. If not, it will signify that the fluctuations could be due to the band structure of the ensemble of nanotubes and might be caused by magnetic depopulation of a onedimensional subband, a phenomenon which, in extended thin films, gives

It must be noticed that the MWCNT in our samples were not arranged as a film but rather form a "carpet" which, under some conditions, should be considered as a 2DEG. In the MWCNT films, the NMR was observed also at low magnetic fields [48], followed by a positive magnetoresistance (PMR), till 12 T. It was argued that the NMR may come from (i) quantum interference [63, 64], (ii) thermal fluctuationinduced tunneling [65], or (iii) Landau levels in disordered graphite [66]. In our case, as the NMR was observed till 25 T and at low temperature, the hypotheses (i) and (ii) can be rejected. As far as the Landau levels, or SdH oscillations [3], could be considered, we notice that the oscillations observed in our experiments appear to be mainly periodic in 1/*B* (in contradiction with which was observed in [3, 30]) and

As a result, in this section, we report the experiments on temperature and magnetic field dependence of the resistance of selfassembled assemblies of pristine

2

2 /(2*ev*0*ħ*<sup>2</sup>

/4*π* ≈ 1.9 × 1012 cm−<sup>2</sup>

) = *ħk*<sup>F</sup> 2

/2*e*. Each

, which is

**146**

MWCNT, in which we attribute the NMR in terms of WL and interpreted the oscillations in terms of SdH behavior.

## **3. Chemically functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes**

The electrical transport properties are the most important for a number of applications of carbon nanotubes. Usually, singletube samples are used for electrical transport studies. Quantum transport properties have been obtained both in singlewall (SWCNT) [5, 9, 24–28] and multiwall nanotubes (MWCNT) [3, 30–35]. For the nanotube array samples, only mean values of the characteristic parameters were expected [38]. But, in some cases, the transport in the arrays of nanotubes was found to show single nanotube properties at low temperatures due to the mostly conductive nanotubes responsible for the transport [25]. On the other hand, for the specific applications, like chemical [15, 16] and bio [17–21] sensors, the synergetic properties of the arrays of nanotube samples are important. They are based on their large surface area per volume and intertube coupling in electrical transport in the arrays of nanotubes [40].

We have shown experimentally that chemically functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes could be assembled into 2D layers (dense arrays) covering large surfaces with inplane electrodes for electrical and magnetotransport testing.

In contrast to the standard morphologies of the samples of arrays of nanotubes involving definitions of bundles (ropes), mats, networks, etc., based on hardly controlled deposition from an organic solvent dispersion of pristine nanotubes, we use the LB technique for chemically functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes. The method we propose offers a radical departure from the existing methodology due to the possibility of covering large surfaces with dense and defectfree, molecularly thin films of carbon nanotubes.

The electrical and magnetotransport properties in the assembled monolayers of carbon nanotubes have been tested.

The organic functionalization of carbon nanotubes had been realized [54–56, 67–69]. But, to our knowledge, up to now, the experimental data on electrical and magnetotransport properties' characterization of dense monolayers manufactured using LB assembling of functionalized nanotubes is very limited. This method is expected to be used for obtaining the layers of very dense arrays of nanotubes for utilizing them for new applications in chemical and biosensors, controlled by electrical transport.

The MWCNTs produced by chemical vapor decomposition (CVD) with catalyst 5% FeCo/CaCO3 were utilized.

Organic functionalization of MWCNTs was based on the scheme described in [69].

The purified MWCNTs were suspended in N,Ndimethylformamide [DMF] HCON(CH3)2 together with excess *p*anisaldehyde (4methoxybenzaldehyde) CH3OC6H4CHO and 3methylhippuric acid [mtoluric acid, N(3methylbenzoyl) glycine] CH3C6H4CONHCH2CO2H.

Heterogeneous mixture was heated at 130°C for 3 days. The scheme of the reaction is described in **Figure 3**. After the reaction was stopped, the organic phase was separated from unreacted material by centrifugation and washing five times with chloroform (CHCl3) and vacuum drying. The obtained dark solid phase was easily soluble in CHCl3 up to a few mg/ml without sonication. The functionalized nanotubes were tested by HRTEM (**Figure 4**) and FTIR (**Figure 5**) methods. Due to the distinct layer on the surface of the nanotubes, observed by HRTEM (**Figure 4**), which is responsible for the absorption peaks in 1400–1500 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> and 1800–1900 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> on FTIR spectra (**Figures 5** and **6**), we conclude that the

#### **Figure 3.**

*The scheme of the reaction of organic functionalization of MWCNTs. The purified MWCNTs were suspended in N,N-dimethylformamide [DMF] HCON(CH3)2 together with excess p-anisaldehyde (4-methoxybenzaldehyde) CH3OC6H4CHO and 3-methylhippuric acid [m-toluric acid, N-(3-methyl-benzoyl) glycine] CH3C6H4CONHCH2CO2H. Heterogeneous mixture was heated at 130°C for 3 days.*

#### **Figure 4.**

**149**

**Figure 6.**

**Figure 7.**

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes*

functionalization procedure described in [69] for singlewall carbon nanotubes works for MWCNTs. An important feature of FTIR spectrum of MWCNT is the

*FTIR spectrum 3-methylhippuric acid, condensed phase. Adapted from the Sigma-Aldrich catalog: https://*

bonding of 3methylhippuric acid and *p*anisaldehyde with MWCNTs, and not just

*Functionalized nanotubes self-assembled in dense arrays (monolayers), covering without empty space the whole* 

The deposition of the layers (arrays) of nanotubes on the surface of the devices with the electrodes was done by using the cell, imitating the LB trough. Once a droplet of the solution of functionalized nanotubes in chloroform was spread on the water surface, a droplet of diblock copolymer PSPMMA solution was added in order to create surface pressure of ~9 mN/m. Functionalized nanotubes were selfassembled in dense arrays (monolayers), covering without empty space the whole surfaces of the fingershaped electrode devices, when the monolayer was picked up from the water surface (**Figure 7**). The same layer of MWCNTs on the substrate at

Utilizing LB method for functionalized nanotubes has shown reliable and reproducible pA isotherms. Based on this, we expect to use LB method for covering large surfaces with dense and defectfree, molecularly ordered ultrathin films of carbon

. This fact has proven covalent

absence of COOH group peak near 3350 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>

higher magnification with SEM is shown in **Figure 8**.

nanotubes with controlled thickness and orientation.

physical adsorption of the surfactant.

*surfaces of the finger-shaped electrode device.*

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

*www.sigmaaldrich.com/spectra/ftir/FTIR005396.PDF.*

**Figure 5.** *FTIR spectra of MWCNTs: no functionalization (a); with functionalization (b).*

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

#### **Figure 6.**

*Perspective of Carbon Nanotubes*

**148**

**Figure 5.**

**Figure 4.**

**Figure 3.**

*organic layer (shown with the arrows).*

*FTIR spectra of MWCNTs: no functionalization (a); with functionalization (b).*

*High-resolution TEM image of organically functionalized MWCNT. The nanotubes are covered with the thin* 

*The scheme of the reaction of organic functionalization of MWCNTs. The purified MWCNTs were suspended in N,N-dimethylformamide [DMF] HCON(CH3)2 together with excess p-anisaldehyde* 

*glycine] CH3C6H4CONHCH2CO2H. Heterogeneous mixture was heated at 130°C for 3 days.*

*(4-methoxybenzaldehyde) CH3OC6H4CHO and 3-methylhippuric acid [m-toluric acid, N-(3-methyl-benzoyl)*

*FTIR spectrum 3-methylhippuric acid, condensed phase. Adapted from the Sigma-Aldrich catalog: https:// www.sigmaaldrich.com/spectra/ftir/FTIR005396.PDF.*

#### **Figure 7.**

*Functionalized nanotubes self-assembled in dense arrays (monolayers), covering without empty space the whole surfaces of the finger-shaped electrode device.*

functionalization procedure described in [69] for singlewall carbon nanotubes works for MWCNTs. An important feature of FTIR spectrum of MWCNT is the absence of COOH group peak near 3350 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> . This fact has proven covalent bonding of 3methylhippuric acid and *p*anisaldehyde with MWCNTs, and not just physical adsorption of the surfactant.

The deposition of the layers (arrays) of nanotubes on the surface of the devices with the electrodes was done by using the cell, imitating the LB trough. Once a droplet of the solution of functionalized nanotubes in chloroform was spread on the water surface, a droplet of diblock copolymer PSPMMA solution was added in order to create surface pressure of ~9 mN/m. Functionalized nanotubes were selfassembled in dense arrays (monolayers), covering without empty space the whole surfaces of the fingershaped electrode devices, when the monolayer was picked up from the water surface (**Figure 7**). The same layer of MWCNTs on the substrate at higher magnification with SEM is shown in **Figure 8**.

Utilizing LB method for functionalized nanotubes has shown reliable and reproducible pA isotherms. Based on this, we expect to use LB method for covering large surfaces with dense and defectfree, molecularly ordered ultrathin films of carbon nanotubes with controlled thickness and orientation.

**Figure 8.** *SEM images of the dense arrays (monolayers) of functionalized MWCNTs, covering surfaces of the substrate.*

#### **Figure 9.**

*The temperature dependence of the resistance of the functionalized MWCNT sample. In the inset, dependence is the same in the logR vs. logT scale. The linear dependence in the double log scale in the range 10–300 K gives a power law with an exponent −0.22 for the temperature dependence.*

The electrical and magnetotransport properties of the layers (arrays) of multiwall carbon nanotubes have been tested in the temperature range 1.8–300 K and in magnetic fields up to 35 T.

The nanotube samples on the electrodes with "fingershape" geometry (**Figure 7**) have shown low resistance (<1 kOhm at room temperature) and a "weak" temperature dependence of the resistance in the shape of power law in the temperature range *T* = 4.2–300 K.

The temperature dependences of the resistance in linear and log–log scales for arrays of the functionalized nanotubes are presented in **Figure 9**. It is interesting to point out that the temperature dependences of the resistance are represented by the power law with the exponent −0.22. While a power law can fit the temperature dependence of the resistance in MWCNT, a behavior suggestive of the formation of a Luttinger liquid, in which the transport is managed by coherent backscattering effects, can be considered [35]. Similar power law temperature dependence with the same value of the exponent was found earlier in SWCNT "bundle" samples deposited on the top of the contacting electrodes [25, 26].

The saturation at low temperatures is noticeable on *R*(*T*) dependence of functionalized nanotubes. This could be explained in the framework of Coulomb blockade and tunneling between tubes through thin organic layers, covering MWCNT surfaces.

The magnetoresistance measurements were carried out in pulsed magnetic fields up to 35 T in the temperature range 1.8–80 K (**Figure 10**). The magnetic field

**151**

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes*

orientation in relation to the current direction was considered "normal" to the

*The magnetoresistance of the functionalized MWCNT sample is carried out in pulsed magnetic fields up to* 

based on the use of the digamma function [61, 62].

With the magnetic field *B* perpendicular to the plane of the sample, NMR was observed in the whole range of available magnetic fields between 1.8 and 80 K in the arrays of functionalized nanotubes (**Figure 10**). As already reported in section 2, the NMR was believed to be observed due to the interference contributions of the closed electron trajectories, which add up constructively at zero magnetic field; that could be considered as the definition of WL [60]. A correct treatment should be

In addition to the NMR at high fields for functionalized nanotubes, we can see a positive magnetoresistance at low fields (inset in **Figure 10**). The positive magnetoresistance increases quadratically and saturates at fields above *B* = 2 T. The weak antilocalization effect [70–72] in multiwall carbon nanotubes [73] appears to be responsible for the positive magnetoresistance. It is attributed to the spindephasing process, arising from the local interfacial fields as a genuine property of the curved

We have reported the experimental observation of the electrical transport properties of assembled (layers) arrays of nonfunctionalized and functionalized MWCNTs. The negative magnetoresistance as a characteristic of weak localization state was observed. In addition to the negative magnetoresistance at high fields for functionalized nanotubes, we observed positive magnetoresistance at

This technology introduces the formation of oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Oxidized MWCNTs become hydrophilic and soluble in water. In order to assemble uniform monolayers of MWCNTs on large surfaces we have developed, the socalled "inverted" Langmuir–Blodgett technique, the essence of which is clear from **Figure 11**. The method consists of the following major technology steps. MWCNT oxidation can be carried out by means of oxidizing liquids such as sulfuric

MWCNT is dispersed in acid solution (3:1 = H2SO4:HNO3) and ultrasonicated for a few hours in a water bath at the elevated temperatures. The solution was stirred

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

current direction.

*35 T in the temperature range 1.8–80 K.*

**Figure 10.**

multiwall tubes [73].

**4. Oxidized carbon nanotubes**

low fields.

and nitric acids.

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

#### **Figure 10.**

*Perspective of Carbon Nanotubes*

**Figure 8.**

**Figure 9.**

magnetic fields up to 35 T.

temperature range *T* = 4.2–300 K.

ited on the top of the contacting electrodes [25, 26].

*power law with an exponent −0.22 for the temperature dependence.*

The electrical and magnetotransport properties of the layers (arrays) of multiwall carbon nanotubes have been tested in the temperature range 1.8–300 K and in

*The temperature dependence of the resistance of the functionalized MWCNT sample. In the inset, dependence is the same in the logR vs. logT scale. The linear dependence in the double log scale in the range 10–300 K gives a* 

*SEM images of the dense arrays (monolayers) of functionalized MWCNTs, covering surfaces of the substrate.*

The temperature dependences of the resistance in linear and log–log scales for arrays of the functionalized nanotubes are presented in **Figure 9**. It is interesting to point out that the temperature dependences of the resistance are represented by the power law with the exponent −0.22. While a power law can fit the temperature dependence of the resistance in MWCNT, a behavior suggestive of the formation of a Luttinger liquid, in which the transport is managed by coherent backscattering effects, can be considered [35]. Similar power law temperature dependence with the same value of the exponent was found earlier in SWCNT "bundle" samples depos-

The saturation at low temperatures is noticeable on *R*(*T*) dependence of functionalized nanotubes. This could be explained in the framework of Coulomb blockade and tunneling between tubes through thin organic layers, covering MWCNT surfaces. The magnetoresistance measurements were carried out in pulsed magnetic fields up to 35 T in the temperature range 1.8–80 K (**Figure 10**). The magnetic field

The nanotube samples on the electrodes with "fingershape" geometry (**Figure 7**) have shown low resistance (<1 kOhm at room temperature) and a "weak" temperature dependence of the resistance in the shape of power law in the

**150**

*The magnetoresistance of the functionalized MWCNT sample is carried out in pulsed magnetic fields up to 35 T in the temperature range 1.8–80 K.*

orientation in relation to the current direction was considered "normal" to the current direction.

With the magnetic field *B* perpendicular to the plane of the sample, NMR was observed in the whole range of available magnetic fields between 1.8 and 80 K in the arrays of functionalized nanotubes (**Figure 10**). As already reported in section 2, the NMR was believed to be observed due to the interference contributions of the closed electron trajectories, which add up constructively at zero magnetic field; that could be considered as the definition of WL [60]. A correct treatment should be based on the use of the digamma function [61, 62].

In addition to the NMR at high fields for functionalized nanotubes, we can see a positive magnetoresistance at low fields (inset in **Figure 10**). The positive magnetoresistance increases quadratically and saturates at fields above *B* = 2 T. The weak antilocalization effect [70–72] in multiwall carbon nanotubes [73] appears to be responsible for the positive magnetoresistance. It is attributed to the spindephasing process, arising from the local interfacial fields as a genuine property of the curved multiwall tubes [73].

We have reported the experimental observation of the electrical transport properties of assembled (layers) arrays of nonfunctionalized and functionalized MWCNTs. The negative magnetoresistance as a characteristic of weak localization state was observed. In addition to the negative magnetoresistance at high fields for functionalized nanotubes, we observed positive magnetoresistance at low fields.

#### **4. Oxidized carbon nanotubes**

This technology introduces the formation of oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Oxidized MWCNTs become hydrophilic and soluble in water. In order to assemble uniform monolayers of MWCNTs on large surfaces we have developed, the socalled "inverted" Langmuir–Blodgett technique, the essence of which is clear from **Figure 11**. The method consists of the following major technology steps. MWCNT oxidation can be carried out by means of oxidizing liquids such as sulfuric and nitric acids.

MWCNT is dispersed in acid solution (3:1 = H2SO4:HNO3) and ultrasonicated for a few hours in a water bath at the elevated temperatures. The solution was stirred

#### **Figure 11.**

*Schematics of the inverted Langmuir–Blodgett technique for the monolayers of MWCNT assembly.*

very well simultaneously. The mixture is filtered by using 0.1micron polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) filter. The filtered oxidized MWCNT is extensively washed with distilled water until pH became neutral. The powder was dried in the oven.

This method generates oxygenated functional groups (OH, C=O, and COOH). Hydroxyl (OH) groups are not highly reactive, but they readily form hydrogen bonds and contribute to making molecules soluble in water.

Carbonyl (C=O) groups have one oxygen atom doublebonded to a carbon atom (symbolized as C=O). Like hydroxyl groups, carbonyl groups contribute to making CNTs watersoluble.

The carboxyl group (symbolized as COOH) has both a carbonyl and a hydroxyl group attached to the same carbon atom, resulting in new properties— it can be ionized—releasing the H from the hydroxyl group as a free proton (H+ ), with the remaining O carrying a negative charge.

MWCNT monolayers were prepared by dispersion in deionized water at the concentration of 0.04–0.05 mg/ml. The surfactant hexadecylamine is dissolved in chloroform to prepare the spreading solution at the concentration of 1 mg/ml and spread onto the surface of the oxidized MWCNT solution in the LB trough. The floating monolayer of highly polarized surfactant molecule, having positively charged hydrophilic ends, makes monolayers with negatively charged oxidized carbon nanotubes through electrostatic interaction. The hybrid monolayer compressed in the LB trough at a rate of a few mm/min. Surface pressurearea (pA) isotherm

#### **Figure 12.**

*The temperature dependence of the resistance of the oxidized MWCNT sample. In the insets, low temperature range dependence in the lnR vs. T<sup>−</sup>1/4 scale shows localization regime of conductivity. The linear dependence in the double ln scale high temperature range gives a power law temperature dependence.*

**153**

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes*

*SEM image of a few micrometer-thick oxidized MWCNT membrane.*

curves of the hybrid monolayers are recorded during the compression. The hybrid monolayers were deposited by vertical dipping on a clean hydrophilic surface. After

The electrical transport properties of the monolayers (arrays) of the oxidized multiwall carbon nanotubes have been tested in the temperature range 4.2–300 K

The oxidized MWCNTs can be assembled in the freestanding layers of arbitrary thickness, utilizing vacuum filtering technique. The resulting MWCNT membranes are very stable and can be further utilized for sensor and energy storage applications. **Figure 13** shows the SEM image of a few micrometerthick membrane.

The common catalysisoriented goals are to understand and predict the proper-

We have shown a very strong catalytic activity of an outer surface of MWCNT, modified by acid oxidation. Nanocrystals of NaF were formed on the surface of MWCNT (**Figure 14**). We have also observed metal nanocrystal "decoration" on the

For example, electrolytic water splitting represents the most environmentally friendly alternative to generate hydrogen gas. However, the kinetics of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) are slow and require a catalyst. Most catalysts to date have been limited to transition metal oxides or noble metals—both of which are expensive and unsustainable. The OER activity rationalized by the oxygencontaining functional groups on the surface of oxidized MWCNTs alters the electronic distribution of the surrounding carbon atoms at the MWCNT surfaces, thereby facilitating the adsorption of water oxidation intermediates. This opens the door to new applications of surfaceoxidized MWCNTs for catalyzing a class of important anodic reactions in water splitting and fuel cells. Further improvements of the activity of the surfaceoxidized carbon nanomaterials may enable the finetuning of the structure and compositions of hybrid carbon materials for

ties of nanosized materials and control how they facilitate chemical reactivity. Another critically important issue deals with the manufacture of nanoscale components from the bottom up and finally to integrate nanoscale components into

macroscopic scale objects and catalysts for realworld uses.

deposition, the surface of the transferred film was dried in a flow of N2 gas.

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

and represented in **Figure 12**.

**5. Nano-catalysis**

**Figure 13.**

surface of MWCNTs.

specific applications.

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

**Figure 13.** *SEM image of a few micrometer-thick oxidized MWCNT membrane.*

curves of the hybrid monolayers are recorded during the compression. The hybrid monolayers were deposited by vertical dipping on a clean hydrophilic surface. After deposition, the surface of the transferred film was dried in a flow of N2 gas.

The electrical transport properties of the monolayers (arrays) of the oxidized multiwall carbon nanotubes have been tested in the temperature range 4.2–300 K and represented in **Figure 12**.

The oxidized MWCNTs can be assembled in the freestanding layers of arbitrary thickness, utilizing vacuum filtering technique. The resulting MWCNT membranes are very stable and can be further utilized for sensor and energy storage applications. **Figure 13** shows the SEM image of a few micrometerthick membrane.

## **5. Nano-catalysis**

*Perspective of Carbon Nanotubes*

CNTs watersoluble.

**Figure 11.**

remaining O carrying a negative charge.

very well simultaneously. The mixture is filtered by using 0.1micron polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) filter. The filtered oxidized MWCNT is extensively washed with distilled water until pH became neutral. The powder was dried in the oven. This method generates oxygenated functional groups (OH, C=O, and COOH). Hydroxyl (OH) groups are not highly reactive, but they readily form hydrogen

*Schematics of the inverted Langmuir–Blodgett technique for the monolayers of MWCNT assembly.*

Carbonyl (C=O) groups have one oxygen atom doublebonded to a carbon atom (symbolized as C=O). Like hydroxyl groups, carbonyl groups contribute to making

The carboxyl group (symbolized as COOH) has both a carbonyl and a hydroxyl group attached to the same carbon atom, resulting in new properties— it can be

MWCNT monolayers were prepared by dispersion in deionized water at the concentration of 0.04–0.05 mg/ml. The surfactant hexadecylamine is dissolved in chloroform to prepare the spreading solution at the concentration of 1 mg/ml and spread onto the surface of the oxidized MWCNT solution in the LB trough. The floating monolayer of highly polarized surfactant molecule, having positively charged hydrophilic ends, makes monolayers with negatively charged oxidized carbon nanotubes through electrostatic interaction. The hybrid monolayer compressed in the LB trough at a rate of a few mm/min. Surface pressurearea (pA) isotherm

*The temperature dependence of the resistance of the oxidized MWCNT sample. In the insets, low temperature range dependence in the lnR vs. T<sup>−</sup>1/4 scale shows localization regime of conductivity. The linear dependence in* 

*the double ln scale high temperature range gives a power law temperature dependence.*

), with the

bonds and contribute to making molecules soluble in water.

ionized—releasing the H from the hydroxyl group as a free proton (H+

**152**

**Figure 12.**

The common catalysisoriented goals are to understand and predict the properties of nanosized materials and control how they facilitate chemical reactivity. Another critically important issue deals with the manufacture of nanoscale components from the bottom up and finally to integrate nanoscale components into macroscopic scale objects and catalysts for realworld uses.

We have shown a very strong catalytic activity of an outer surface of MWCNT, modified by acid oxidation. Nanocrystals of NaF were formed on the surface of MWCNT (**Figure 14**). We have also observed metal nanocrystal "decoration" on the surface of MWCNTs.

For example, electrolytic water splitting represents the most environmentally friendly alternative to generate hydrogen gas. However, the kinetics of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) are slow and require a catalyst. Most catalysts to date have been limited to transition metal oxides or noble metals—both of which are expensive and unsustainable. The OER activity rationalized by the oxygencontaining functional groups on the surface of oxidized MWCNTs alters the electronic distribution of the surrounding carbon atoms at the MWCNT surfaces, thereby facilitating the adsorption of water oxidation intermediates. This opens the door to new applications of surfaceoxidized MWCNTs for catalyzing a class of important anodic reactions in water splitting and fuel cells. Further improvements of the activity of the surfaceoxidized carbon nanomaterials may enable the finetuning of the structure and compositions of hybrid carbon materials for specific applications.

**Figure 14.**

*Nanocrystals of NaF formed on the surface of oxidized MWCNT (top panel). Mass spectrum of NaF nanocrystals "decorated" MWCNTs (bottom panel); M/Z is the ratio of ion mass to its charge.*

## **6. Carbon nanotube assembling and physical cross-linking**

We have developed a novel physical method of stable linkage between neighboring carbon nanotubes in 2D layers (dense arrays), by intertube bridging using Ar+ ion beam (**Figure 15**).

The carbon nanotube layer has modified using ion beam irradiation. It introduces stable link formation between neighboring carbon nanotubes, in other words, bridging or physical crosslinking.

The intertube bridging (crosslinking) of MWCNTs and SWCNTs in the arrays was observed under the Ar+ ion irradiation. This method can be utilized for the improvement of the electrical and thermal conductivity properties of carbon nanotube layers for electron transport heat transfer applications.

#### **Figure 15.**

*(a) The image of the initial (unprocessed) array of multiwall carbon nanotubes. (b) The image of a "shorttime" processing regime: 6 kV, 60 s. Just the ends of the tubes attacked by Ar+ -ion irradiation. (c) The image of a "long-time" processing regime: 6 kV, 10 min. The continuous cross-linked network of the MW carbon after the Ar<sup>+</sup> -ion irradiation is observed.*

**155**

**Figure 16.**

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes*

**7. Nanosensor applications of carbon nanotube films**

be extremely sensitive to the adsorption of polar H2O molecules.

formation is too late for the safety of the aircrafts.

were developed earlier [75, 76].

resistance of the sensor vs. temperature.

resistance of the carbon nanotubes decreases again.

*SEM image of the morphology of multiwall carbon nanotube film.*

In this chapter we would like to point out an example of application of films of MWCNT as a new icing condition resistive sensor that we have developed. These sensors are based on the adsorption of a molecular thin layer of water on the surface of carbon nanotubes and on the detection of the firstorder phase transition of water molecules into ice. This transition is very well detected as a result of nonmonotonous dependence of the resistance of the sensor vs. temperature in the vicinity of the freezing point due to a virtual "field effect transistor." Electronic transport in carbon nanotube films, assembled into the resistive films, was found to

Modern sensors of icing conditions (optical or piezo devices) are based on the detection of the actual (significantly thick) layers of ice formed on the surfaces. The accumulation of the ice layer is a fast process, and detection of the massive ice

We have developed a method of assembling MWCNT films of arbitrary thickness for sensor applications. This method involves oxidation of carbon nanotubes and does have several major advantages over the conventional methods of carbon nanotube assembling via their functionalization. The assembled carbon nanotube films are dense, homogeneous, and strong on the macro level, but internally they consist of disordered structure of selfassembled carbon nanotubes, forming conductive medium, as it is seen in **Figure 16**. Besides they are hydrophilic and adsorb water molecules strongly. Based on our experience of multiwall CNT characterization [22, 74], we were able to study them at fixed values of humidity and temperature variation. Standard sensors of relative humidity based on multiwall carbon nanotubes

We have found that the adsorption of the water vapor at the temperatures close to freezing conditions generates a specific nonmonotonous dependence of the

The intensive precipitation of the water vapor, when the temperature is decreas-

ing, results in the increase of the resistance of the nanosensor, due to the "field effect" created by the adsorbed polar water molecules on the surface of slightly charged CNT tubes. A further decrease of the temperature passing the freezing point results in the sudden drop of the resistance ("lambdapoint"type curve at the phase transitions of the first order) (see the insert in **Figure 17**) due to the water transition to nonpolar ice crystal. As a result, the "field effect" disappears, and the

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

**6. Carbon nanotube assembling and physical cross-linking**

We have developed a novel physical method of stable linkage between neighboring carbon nanotubes in 2D layers (dense arrays), by intertube bridging using

*Nanocrystals of NaF formed on the surface of oxidized MWCNT (top panel). Mass spectrum of NaF nanocrystals "decorated" MWCNTs (bottom panel); M/Z is the ratio of ion mass to its charge.*

The carbon nanotube layer has modified using ion beam irradiation. It introduces stable link formation between neighboring carbon nanotubes, in other words,

The intertube bridging (crosslinking) of MWCNTs and SWCNTs in the arrays

improvement of the electrical and thermal conductivity properties of carbon

*(a) The image of the initial (unprocessed) array of multiwall carbon nanotubes. (b) The image of a "short-*

*a "long-time" processing regime: 6 kV, 10 min. The continuous cross-linked network of the MW carbon after the* 

nanotube layers for electron transport heat transfer applications.

*time" processing regime: 6 kV, 60 s. Just the ends of the tubes attacked by Ar+*

ion irradiation. This method can be utilized for the

*-ion irradiation. (c) The image of* 

**154**

*Ar<sup>+</sup>*

**Figure 15.**

Ar+

**Figure 14.**

ion beam (**Figure 15**).

was observed under the Ar+

*-ion irradiation is observed.*

bridging or physical crosslinking.

## **7. Nanosensor applications of carbon nanotube films**

In this chapter we would like to point out an example of application of films of MWCNT as a new icing condition resistive sensor that we have developed. These sensors are based on the adsorption of a molecular thin layer of water on the surface of carbon nanotubes and on the detection of the firstorder phase transition of water molecules into ice. This transition is very well detected as a result of nonmonotonous dependence of the resistance of the sensor vs. temperature in the vicinity of the freezing point due to a virtual "field effect transistor." Electronic transport in carbon nanotube films, assembled into the resistive films, was found to be extremely sensitive to the adsorption of polar H2O molecules.

Modern sensors of icing conditions (optical or piezo devices) are based on the detection of the actual (significantly thick) layers of ice formed on the surfaces. The accumulation of the ice layer is a fast process, and detection of the massive ice formation is too late for the safety of the aircrafts.

We have developed a method of assembling MWCNT films of arbitrary thickness for sensor applications. This method involves oxidation of carbon nanotubes and does have several major advantages over the conventional methods of carbon nanotube assembling via their functionalization. The assembled carbon nanotube films are dense, homogeneous, and strong on the macro level, but internally they consist of disordered structure of selfassembled carbon nanotubes, forming conductive medium, as it is seen in **Figure 16**. Besides they are hydrophilic and adsorb water molecules strongly. Based on our experience of multiwall CNT characterization [22, 74], we were able to study them at fixed values of humidity and temperature variation.

Standard sensors of relative humidity based on multiwall carbon nanotubes were developed earlier [75, 76].

We have found that the adsorption of the water vapor at the temperatures close to freezing conditions generates a specific nonmonotonous dependence of the resistance of the sensor vs. temperature.

The intensive precipitation of the water vapor, when the temperature is decreasing, results in the increase of the resistance of the nanosensor, due to the "field effect" created by the adsorbed polar water molecules on the surface of slightly charged CNT tubes. A further decrease of the temperature passing the freezing point results in the sudden drop of the resistance ("lambdapoint"type curve at the phase transitions of the first order) (see the insert in **Figure 17**) due to the water transition to nonpolar ice crystal. As a result, the "field effect" disappears, and the resistance of the carbon nanotubes decreases again.

**Figure 16.** *SEM image of the morphology of multiwall carbon nanotube film.*

**Figure 17.** *Temperature dependence of the resistance of the MWCNT layer in the presence of water vapors. Note, the maximum of the resistance was found to be located in the nearest proximity of the water freezing point at T = 0°C.*

In order to verify, if the positions of the peaks correspond to the humidity (dew point or frost point), we did temperature scans at different controllable values of the humidity. The dependences of the resistance of the CNT sensor measured at fast temperature scan at different humidity levels and temperature variations from approx +50°C down to −50°C are plotted in **Figure 18**. The temperature dependences of the resistance of the CNT sensors measured at the slow temperature scan (≤0.01°C/s in the cryocell of our own design) are shown in **Figure 19**. As can be seen in **Figures 18** and **19**, if the temperature drops down, a significant resistance increase takes place, followed by the maximum point of the resistance and sudden resistance drop due to the ice formation.

There is a significant difference in the observation of the dew points and the frost points using CNT sensors. If we observe *T*dew, which is higher than the freezing point, we observe significant resistance increase due to condensation. Then the saturation occurs and, at the freezing point, is characterized by a sudden resistance decrease. In the meantime, if we observe frost points instead, while the temperature decreases, the condensation corresponds to the frost point.

**Figure 18.**

*The resistance of the CNT sensor vs. temperature at different humidity levels at the fast temperature scan of ~1°C/s.*

**157**

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes*

**8. Coating carbon nanotubes with diamond-like carbon films**

mined that it is adding significant reinforcement to the MWCNT matrix.

(DLC) film over the CNT matrix (**Figure 20**).

films of arbitrary thickness have been developed.

*SEM pictures of the DLC film deposited on the top of the MWCNT layer.*

by organic chemical functionalization, and the oxidized CNTs.

mechanical properties.

*in the cryo-cell of our own design.*

**Figure 19.**

**9. Conclusions**

**Figure 20.**

for further applications.

A commercial plasma CVD setup was used to deposit a diamondlike carbon

*Temperature dependences of the resistance of the CNT sensors measured at the slow temperature scan* ≤*0.01°C/s* 

We found out that thin (~50 nm thick) DLC films have significantly improved

DLC coating on the CNT layers has a high degree of wettability. We also deter-

Several methods of assembling MWCNTs into monolayers and freestanding

We have studied assemblies of pristine (nonmodified) CNTs, CNTs modified

We have experimentally tested the electrical transport properties of assembled

layers (films) of nonfunctionalized, functionalized, and oxidized MWCNTs. The temperature dependence of the resistance and magnetoresistance of the selfassembled arrays of MWCNT, tested in the wide temperature range, were considered as a tool to determine the transport characteristics of the films, important

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

#### **Figure 19.**

*Perspective of Carbon Nanotubes*

**Figure 17.**

resistance drop due to the ice formation.

decreases, the condensation corresponds to the frost point.

In order to verify, if the positions of the peaks correspond to the humidity (dew point or frost point), we did temperature scans at different controllable values of the humidity. The dependences of the resistance of the CNT sensor measured at fast temperature scan at different humidity levels and temperature variations from approx +50°C down to −50°C are plotted in **Figure 18**. The temperature dependences of the resistance of the CNT sensors measured at the slow temperature scan (≤0.01°C/s in the cryocell of our own design) are shown in **Figure 19**. As can be seen in **Figures 18** and **19**, if the temperature drops down, a significant resistance increase takes place, followed by the maximum point of the resistance and sudden

*Temperature dependence of the resistance of the MWCNT layer in the presence of water vapors. Note, the maximum of the resistance was found to be located in the nearest proximity of the water freezing point at T = 0°C.*

There is a significant difference in the observation of the dew points and the frost points using CNT sensors. If we observe *T*dew, which is higher than the freezing point, we observe significant resistance increase due to condensation. Then the saturation occurs and, at the freezing point, is characterized by a sudden resistance decrease. In the meantime, if we observe frost points instead, while the temperature

*The resistance of the CNT sensor vs. temperature at different humidity levels at the fast temperature scan of ~1°C/s.*

**156**

**Figure 18.**

*Temperature dependences of the resistance of the CNT sensors measured at the slow temperature scan* ≤*0.01°C/s in the cryo-cell of our own design.*

### **8. Coating carbon nanotubes with diamond-like carbon films**

A commercial plasma CVD setup was used to deposit a diamondlike carbon (DLC) film over the CNT matrix (**Figure 20**).

We found out that thin (~50 nm thick) DLC films have significantly improved mechanical properties.

DLC coating on the CNT layers has a high degree of wettability. We also determined that it is adding significant reinforcement to the MWCNT matrix.

**Figure 20.** *SEM pictures of the DLC film deposited on the top of the MWCNT layer.*

#### **9. Conclusions**

Several methods of assembling MWCNTs into monolayers and freestanding films of arbitrary thickness have been developed.

We have studied assemblies of pristine (nonmodified) CNTs, CNTs modified by organic chemical functionalization, and the oxidized CNTs.

We have experimentally tested the electrical transport properties of assembled layers (films) of nonfunctionalized, functionalized, and oxidized MWCNTs.

The temperature dependence of the resistance and magnetoresistance of the selfassembled arrays of MWCNT, tested in the wide temperature range, were considered as a tool to determine the transport characteristics of the films, important for further applications.

The negative magnetoresistance as a characteristic of weak localization state was observed. In addition to the negative magnetoresistance at high fields for functionalized nanotubes, we observed positive magnetoresistance at low fields.

The layers of MWCNTs have been considered as attractive materials for various nanosensors and as the electrodes of electrochemical energy storage devices. We have shown an example of application of films of MWCNT as an icing condition resistive sensor. A very strong catalytic activity of an outer surface of MWCNT, modified by oxidation, has been pointed out as well.

We have developed a novel method of stable physical linkage between the neighboring carbon nanotubes in 2D layers (dense arrays) by intertube bridging using Ar+ ion beam and the method of MWCNT coating with diamondlike carbon films as well.

## **Acknowledgements**

V.S. is very grateful to the Ministry of Education of France for the fellowship, the National Science Foundation of Switzerland, Award #7BYPJ065694 for support, the Laboratoire National des Champs Magnetiques Intenses de Toulouse, Dr. Jean Galibert and Prof. Laszlo Forró for hospitality. He would like to express his sincere gratitude to Dr. J. Quinn for the help with SEM imaging, Dr. M. Seo for the help with TEM, Dr. Y. Seo and Dr. J. Koo for the help with MWCNT oxidation, and Dr. V. Zaitsev for the help with the organic functionalization of MWCNT. Finally, V.S. acknowledges support of the Sensor CAT and the Research Foundation of SUNY. N.P. acknowledges support of the Belarusian Research Program "Convergence2020" and the Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research (Grant No. F18R253).

## **Author details**

Vladimir Samuilov1,2\*, Jean Galibert2 and Nikolai Poklonski3

1 Department of Materials Science, SUNY at SB, Stony Brook, NY, USA

2 Laboratoire National des Champs Magnetiques Intenses, LNCMIEMFL, CNRS/ INSA/UGA/UPS, Toulouse and Grenoble, France

3 Department of Physics, Belarusian State University, Minsk, Belarus

\*Address all correspondence to: vladimir.samuilov@stonybrook.edu

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**159**

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes*

in semiconducting singlewall carbon nanotubes. Physical Review Letters. 2001;**87**:256805. DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.87.256805

[10] Goze C, Vaccarini L, Henrard L, Bernier P, Hernandez E, Rubio A. Elastic

[11] Fraysse J, Minett AI, Jaschinski O, Duesberg GS, Roth S. Carbon nanotubes

[12] Vigolo B, Pénicaud A, Coulon C, Sauder C, Pailler R, Journet C, et al. Macroscopic fibers and ribbons of oriented carbon nanotubes. Science. 2000;**290**:13311334. DOI: 10.1126/

[13] Frackowiak E, Gautier S, Gaucher H, Bonnamy S, Beguin F. Electrochemical storage of lithium multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Carbon. 1999;**37**:6169. DOI:

[14] Collins PG, Bradley K, Ishigami M, Zettl A. Extreme oxygen sensitivity

10.1016/S00086223(98)001870

[15] Varghese OK, Kichambre PD, Gong D, Ong KG, Dickey EC,

[16] Kong J, Franklin NR, Zhou C, Chaplin MG, Peng S, Cho K, et al. Nanotube molecular wires as chemical sensors. Science. 2000;**287**:622625. DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5453.622

Grimes CA. Gas sensing characteristics of multiwall carbon nanotubes. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2001;**81**:3241. DOI: 10.1016/ S09254005(01)009236

of electronic properties of carbon nanotubes. Science. 2000;**287**:18011804. DOI: 10.1126/

science.287.5459.1801

and mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes. Synthetic Metals. 1999;**103**:25002501. DOI: 10.1016/

acting like actuators. Carbon. 2002;**40**:17351739. DOI: 10.1016/

S00086223(02)000416

science.290.5495.1331

S03796779(98)010716

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

[1] Iijima S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature. 1991;**354**: 5658. DOI: 10.1038/354056a0

Opportunities and challenges. Surface Science. 2002;**500**:218241. DOI: 10.1016/S00396028(01)015588

[3] Forró L, Schönenberger C. Physical properties of multiwall nanotubes. In: Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Avouris P, editors. Carbon Nanotubes, Topics Applied Physics. Vol. 80. Berlin: Springer; 2001. pp. 329391. DOI: 10.1007/354039947X\_13

Ratkevich SV, Hieu NN, et al. Synergy

[2] Dai H. Carbon nanotubes:

[4] Poklonski NA, Vyrko SA, Siahlo AI, Poklonskaya ON,

of physical properties of lowdimensional carbonbased systems for nanoscale device design. Materials Research Express. 2019;**6**:042002. DOI:

10.1088/20531591/aafb1c

S03010104(02)003762

[6] Hartmann RR, Kono J,

Portnoi ME. Terahertz science and technology of carbon nanomaterials. Nanotechnology. 2014;**25**:322001. DOI: 10.1088/09574484/25/32/322001

[7] Martel R, Schmidt T, Shea HR,

2449. DOI: 10.1063/1.122477

Hertel T, Avouris P. Single and multiwall carbon nanotube fieldeffect transistors. Applied Physics Letters. 1998;**73**:2447

[8] Tans SJ, Verschueren ARM, Dekker C. Roomtemperature transistor based on a single carbon nanotube. Nature. 1998;**393**:4952. DOI: 10.1038/29954

[9] Martel R, Derycke V, Lavoie C, Appenzeller J, Chan KK, Tersoff J, et al. Ambipolar electrical transport

[5] Avouris P. Carbon nanotube electronics. Chemical Physics. 2002;**281**:429445. DOI: 10.1016/

**References**

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

## **References**

*Perspective of Carbon Nanotubes*

**Acknowledgements**

Research (Grant No. F18R253).

Vladimir Samuilov1,2\*, Jean Galibert2

INSA/UGA/UPS, Toulouse and Grenoble, France

provided the original work is properly cited.

**Author details**

The negative magnetoresistance as a characteristic of weak localization state was observed. In addition to the negative magnetoresistance at high fields for function-

The layers of MWCNTs have been considered as attractive materials for various nanosensors and as the electrodes of electrochemical energy storage devices. We have shown an example of application of films of MWCNT as an icing condition resistive sensor. A very strong catalytic activity of an outer surface of MWCNT,

We have developed a novel method of stable physical linkage between the neighbor-

ion

ing carbon nanotubes in 2D layers (dense arrays) by intertube bridging using Ar+

beam and the method of MWCNT coating with diamondlike carbon films as well.

V.S. is very grateful to the Ministry of Education of France for the fellowship, the National Science Foundation of Switzerland, Award #7BYPJ065694 for support, the Laboratoire National des Champs Magnetiques Intenses de Toulouse, Dr. Jean Galibert and Prof. Laszlo Forró for hospitality. He would like to express his sincere gratitude to Dr. J. Quinn for the help with SEM imaging, Dr. M. Seo for the help with TEM, Dr. Y. Seo and Dr. J. Koo for the help with MWCNT oxidation, and Dr. V. Zaitsev for the help with the organic functionalization of MWCNT. Finally, V.S. acknowledges support of the Sensor CAT and the Research Foundation of SUNY. N.P. acknowledges support of the Belarusian Research Program

"Convergence2020" and the Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental

1 Department of Materials Science, SUNY at SB, Stony Brook, NY, USA

3 Department of Physics, Belarusian State University, Minsk, Belarus

\*Address all correspondence to: vladimir.samuilov@stonybrook.edu

2 Laboratoire National des Champs Magnetiques Intenses, LNCMIEMFL, CNRS/

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,

and Nikolai Poklonski3

alized nanotubes, we observed positive magnetoresistance at low fields.

modified by oxidation, has been pointed out as well.

**158**

[1] Iijima S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature. 1991;**354**: 5658. DOI: 10.1038/354056a0

[2] Dai H. Carbon nanotubes: Opportunities and challenges. Surface Science. 2002;**500**:218241. DOI: 10.1016/S00396028(01)015588

[3] Forró L, Schönenberger C. Physical properties of multiwall nanotubes. In: Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Avouris P, editors. Carbon Nanotubes, Topics Applied Physics. Vol. 80. Berlin: Springer; 2001. pp. 329391. DOI: 10.1007/354039947X\_13

[4] Poklonski NA, Vyrko SA, Siahlo AI, Poklonskaya ON, Ratkevich SV, Hieu NN, et al. Synergy of physical properties of lowdimensional carbonbased systems for nanoscale device design. Materials Research Express. 2019;**6**:042002. DOI: 10.1088/20531591/aafb1c

[5] Avouris P. Carbon nanotube electronics. Chemical Physics. 2002;**281**:429445. DOI: 10.1016/ S03010104(02)003762

[6] Hartmann RR, Kono J, Portnoi ME. Terahertz science and technology of carbon nanomaterials. Nanotechnology. 2014;**25**:322001. DOI: 10.1088/09574484/25/32/322001

[7] Martel R, Schmidt T, Shea HR, Hertel T, Avouris P. Single and multiwall carbon nanotube fieldeffect transistors. Applied Physics Letters. 1998;**73**:2447 2449. DOI: 10.1063/1.122477

[8] Tans SJ, Verschueren ARM, Dekker C. Roomtemperature transistor based on a single carbon nanotube. Nature. 1998;**393**:4952. DOI: 10.1038/29954

[9] Martel R, Derycke V, Lavoie C, Appenzeller J, Chan KK, Tersoff J, et al. Ambipolar electrical transport in semiconducting singlewall carbon nanotubes. Physical Review Letters. 2001;**87**:256805. DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.87.256805

[10] Goze C, Vaccarini L, Henrard L, Bernier P, Hernandez E, Rubio A. Elastic and mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes. Synthetic Metals. 1999;**103**:25002501. DOI: 10.1016/ S03796779(98)010716

[11] Fraysse J, Minett AI, Jaschinski O, Duesberg GS, Roth S. Carbon nanotubes acting like actuators. Carbon. 2002;**40**:17351739. DOI: 10.1016/ S00086223(02)000416

[12] Vigolo B, Pénicaud A, Coulon C, Sauder C, Pailler R, Journet C, et al. Macroscopic fibers and ribbons of oriented carbon nanotubes. Science. 2000;**290**:13311334. DOI: 10.1126/ science.290.5495.1331

[13] Frackowiak E, Gautier S, Gaucher H, Bonnamy S, Beguin F. Electrochemical storage of lithium multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Carbon. 1999;**37**:6169. DOI: 10.1016/S00086223(98)001870

[14] Collins PG, Bradley K, Ishigami M, Zettl A. Extreme oxygen sensitivity of electronic properties of carbon nanotubes. Science. 2000;**287**:18011804. DOI: 10.1126/ science.287.5459.1801

[15] Varghese OK, Kichambre PD, Gong D, Ong KG, Dickey EC, Grimes CA. Gas sensing characteristics of multiwall carbon nanotubes. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2001;**81**:3241. DOI: 10.1016/ S09254005(01)009236

[16] Kong J, Franklin NR, Zhou C, Chaplin MG, Peng S, Cho K, et al. Nanotube molecular wires as chemical sensors. Science. 2000;**287**:622625. DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5453.622

[17] Guo Z, Sadler PJ, Tsang SC. Immobilization and visualization of DNA and proteins on carbon nanotubes. Advanced Materials. 1998;**10**:701 703. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521 4095(199806)10:9<701::AID-ADMA701>3.0.CO;24

[18] Davis JJ, Green MLH, Hill HAO, Leung YC, Sadler PJ, Sloan J, et al. The immobilization of proteins in carbon nanotubes. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 1998;**272**:261266. DOI: 10.1016/ S00201693(97)059264

[19] Balavoine F, Schultz P, Richard C, Mallouh V, Ebbesen TW, Mioskowski C. Helical crystallization of proteins on carbon nanotubes: A first step towards the developments of new biosensors. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 1999;**38**:1912 1915. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521 3773(19990712)38:13/14<1912::AID-ANIE1912>3.0.CO;22

[20] Chen RJ, Zhang Y, Wang D, Dai H. Noncovalent sidewall functionalization of singlewalled carbon nanotubes for protein immobilization. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2001;**123**:38383839. DOI: 10.1021/ ja010172b

[21] Xue HG, Sun WL, He BJ, Shen ZQ. A new application of carbon nanotubes constructing biosensor. Chinese Chemical Letters. 2002;**13**:799800

[22] Ksenevich V, Galibert J, Samuilov V. Charge transport in carbon nanotube films and fibers. In: Marulanda JM, editor. Carbon Nanotubes. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2010. pp. 123146. DOI: 10.5772/39422

[23] Ksenevich VK, Gorbachuk NI, Poklonski NA, Samuilov VA, Kozlov ME, Wieck AD. Impedance of singlewalled carbon nanotube fibers. Fullerenes, Nanotubes, and Carbon Nanostructures. 2012;**20**:434438. DOI: 10.1080/1536383X.2012.655562

[24] Frank S, Poncharal P, Wang ZL, de Heer WA. Carbon nanotube quantum resistors. Science. 1998;**280**:17441746. DOI: 10.1126/science.280.5370.1744

[25] Bockrath M, Cobden DH, Lu J, Rinzler AG, Smalley RE, Balents L, et al. Luttingerliquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes. Nature. 1999;**397**:598601. DOI: 10.1038/17569

[26] Nygard J, Cobden DH, Bockrath M, McEuen PL, Lindelof PE. Electrical transport measurements on singlewalled carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing. 1999;**69**:297304. DOI: 10.1007/ s003390051

[27] Zhou C, Kong J, Dai H. Electrical measurements of individual semiconducting singlewalled carbon nanotubes of various diameter. Applied Physics Letters. 2000;**76**:15971599. DOI: 10.1063/1.126107

[28] Shea HR, Martel R, Avouris P. Electrical transport in rings of singlewall nanotubes: Onedimensional localization. Physical Review Letters. 2000;**84**:44414444. DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.84.4441

[29] Laird EA, Kuemmeth F, Steele GA, GroveRasmussen K, Nygård J, Flensberg K, et al. Quantum transport in carbon nanotubes. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2015;**87**:703764. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.703

[30] Langer L, Bayot V, Grivei E, Issi JP, Heremans JP, Olk CH, et al. Quantum transport in a multiwalled carbon nanotube. Physical Review Letters. 1996;**76**:479482. DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.76.479

[31] Bachtold A, Henny M, Terrier C, Strunk C, Schönenberger C, Salvetat JP, et al. Contacting carbon nanotubes selectively with lowohmic contacts fourprobe electric measurement.

**161**

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes*

characteristics of carbon nanotube doped composites. PhysicsUspekhi. 2015;**58**:209251. DOI: 10.3367/ UFNe.0185.201503a.0225

[40] Stahl H, Appenzeller J, Martel R, Avouris P, Lengeler B. Intertube coupling in ropes of singlewall carbon nanotubes. Physical Review

Letters. 2000;**85**:51865189

PhysRevB.62.R16353

PhysRevB.55.R4921

[41] Krstić V, Roth S, Burghard M. Phase breaking in threeterminal contacted singlewalled carbon nanotube bundles. Physical Review B.

2000;**62**:R16352R16355. DOI: 10.1103/

[42] Park JG, Kim GT, Park JH, Yu HY, McIntosh G, Krstic V, et al. Quantum transport in lowdimensional organic nanostructures. Thin Solid Films. 2001;**393**:161167. DOI: 10.1016/ S00406090(01)010641

[43] Fischer JE, Dai H, Thess A, Lee R, Hanjani NM, Dehaas DL, et al. Metallic resistivity in crystalline ropes of singlewall carbon nanotubes. Physical Review B. 1997;**55**:R4921R4924. DOI: 10.1103/

[44] Kaiser AB, Park YW, Kim GT, Choi ES, Düsberg G, Roth S. Electronic

[45] Kaiser AB, Düsberg G, Roth S. Heterogeneous model for conduction in carbon nanotubes. Physical Review B. 1998;**57**:14181421. DOI:

transport in carbon nanotube ropes and mats. Synthetic Metals. 1999;**103**:25472550. DOI: 10.1016/

S03796779(98)002227

10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1418

[46] Kim GT, Jhang SH, Park JG, Park YW, Roth S. Nonohmic current–voltage characteristics in singlewall carbon nanotube network. Synthetic Metals. 2001;**117**:123126. DOI: 10.1016/ S03796779(00)005518

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

Applied Physics Letters. 1998;**73**:274

[32] Bachtold A, Strunk C, Salvetat JP, Bonard JM, Forró L, Nussbaumer T, et al. Aharonov–Bohm oscillations in carbon nanotubes. Nature.

1999;**397**:673675. DOI: 10.1038/17755

[34] Lee JO, Kim JR, Kim JJ, Kim JH, Kim N, Park JW, et al. Magnetoresistance

multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Physical Review B. 2000;**61**:R16362R16365. DOI:

Hsu WK. Electrical transport in doped multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Physical

and differential conductance in

10.1103/PhysRevB.61.R16362

[35] Liu K, Avouris P, Martel R,

Review B. 2001;**63**:161404. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.161404

[36] Stojetz B, Miko C, Forró L, Strunk C. Effect of band structure on quantum interference in multiwall carbon nanotubes. Physical Review Letters. 2005;**94**:186802. DOI: 10.1103/

[37] Ishikawa S, Enomoto R, Aoki N, Umishita K, Ishibashi K, Aoyagi Y, et al. Onedimensional conduction in multiwall carbon nanotubes. Springer Proceedings in Physics.

[38] Liu K, Roth S, Duesberg G, Wagenhals M, Journet C, Bernier P. Transport properties of singlewalled carbon nanotubes. Synthetic Metals. 1999;**103**:25132514. DOI: 10.1016/

S03796779(98)010819

[39] Eletskii AV, Knizhnik AA, Potapkin BV, Kenny JM. Electrical

PhysRevLett.94.186802

2001;**87**:16611662

[33] Schönenberger C, Bachtold A, Strunk C, Salvetat JP, Forró L. nterference and interaction in multiwall carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing. 1999;**69**:283295. DOI: 10.1007/

s003390051

276. DOI: 10.1063/1.121778

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

Applied Physics Letters. 1998;**73**:274 276. DOI: 10.1063/1.121778

*Perspective of Carbon Nanotubes*

[17] Guo Z, Sadler PJ, Tsang SC. Immobilization and visualization of DNA and proteins on carbon nanotubes. Advanced Materials. 1998;**10**:701 703. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521 4095(199806)10:9<701::AID-ADMA701>3.0.CO;24

[24] Frank S, Poncharal P, Wang ZL, de Heer WA. Carbon nanotube quantum resistors. Science. 1998;**280**:17441746. DOI: 10.1126/science.280.5370.1744

[25] Bockrath M, Cobden DH, Lu J, Rinzler AG, Smalley RE, Balents L, et al. Luttingerliquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes. Nature. 1999;**397**:598601.

DOI: 10.1038/17569

s003390051

[26] Nygard J, Cobden DH, Bockrath M, McEuen PL, Lindelof PE. Electrical transport measurements on singlewalled carbon

nanotubes. Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing. 1999;**69**:297304. DOI: 10.1007/

measurements of individual

DOI: 10.1063/1.126107

PhysRevLett.84.4441

[29] Laird EA, Kuemmeth F,

10.1103/RevModPhys.87.703

PhysRevLett.76.479

[30] Langer L, Bayot V, Grivei E, Issi JP, Heremans JP, Olk CH, et al. Quantum transport in a multiwalled carbon nanotube. Physical Review Letters. 1996;**76**:479482. DOI: 10.1103/

[31] Bachtold A, Henny M, Terrier C, Strunk C, Schönenberger C, Salvetat JP, et al. Contacting carbon nanotubes selectively with lowohmic contacts fourprobe electric measurement.

Steele GA, GroveRasmussen K, Nygård J, Flensberg K, et al. Quantum transport in carbon nanotubes. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2015;**87**:703764. DOI:

[27] Zhou C, Kong J, Dai H. Electrical

semiconducting singlewalled carbon nanotubes of various diameter. Applied Physics Letters. 2000;**76**:15971599.

[28] Shea HR, Martel R, Avouris P. Electrical transport in rings of singlewall nanotubes: Onedimensional localization. Physical Review Letters. 2000;**84**:44414444. DOI: 10.1103/

[18] Davis JJ, Green MLH, Hill HAO, Leung YC, Sadler PJ, Sloan J, et al. The immobilization of proteins in carbon nanotubes. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 1998;**272**:261266. DOI: 10.1016/

Richard C, Mallouh V, Ebbesen TW, Mioskowski C. Helical crystallization of proteins on carbon nanotubes: A first step towards the developments of new biosensors. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 1999;**38**:1912 1915. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521 3773(19990712)38:13/14<1912::AID-

[20] Chen RJ, Zhang Y, Wang D, Dai H. Noncovalent sidewall functionalization of singlewalled carbon nanotubes for protein immobilization. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2001;**123**:38383839. DOI: 10.1021/

[21] Xue HG, Sun WL, He BJ, Shen ZQ. A new application of carbon nanotubes constructing biosensor. Chinese Chemical Letters. 2002;**13**:799800

[22] Ksenevich V, Galibert J, Samuilov V. Charge transport in carbon nanotube films and fibers. In: Marulanda JM, editor. Carbon Nanotubes. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2010. pp. 123146. DOI:

[23] Ksenevich VK, Gorbachuk NI, Poklonski NA, Samuilov VA, Kozlov ME,

Wieck AD. Impedance of singlewalled carbon nanotube fibers. Fullerenes, Nanotubes, and Carbon Nanostructures. 2012;**20**:434438. DOI:

10.1080/1536383X.2012.655562

S00201693(97)059264

ANIE1912>3.0.CO;22

ja010172b

10.5772/39422

[19] Balavoine F, Schultz P,

**160**

[32] Bachtold A, Strunk C, Salvetat JP, Bonard JM, Forró L, Nussbaumer T, et al. Aharonov–Bohm oscillations in carbon nanotubes. Nature. 1999;**397**:673675. DOI: 10.1038/17755

[33] Schönenberger C, Bachtold A, Strunk C, Salvetat JP, Forró L. nterference and interaction in multiwall carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing. 1999;**69**:283295. DOI: 10.1007/ s003390051

[34] Lee JO, Kim JR, Kim JJ, Kim JH, Kim N, Park JW, et al. Magnetoresistance and differential conductance in multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Physical Review B. 2000;**61**:R16362R16365. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.R16362

[35] Liu K, Avouris P, Martel R, Hsu WK. Electrical transport in doped multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Physical Review B. 2001;**63**:161404. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.161404

[36] Stojetz B, Miko C, Forró L, Strunk C. Effect of band structure on quantum interference in multiwall carbon nanotubes. Physical Review Letters. 2005;**94**:186802. DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.94.186802

[37] Ishikawa S, Enomoto R, Aoki N, Umishita K, Ishibashi K, Aoyagi Y, et al. Onedimensional conduction in multiwall carbon nanotubes. Springer Proceedings in Physics. 2001;**87**:16611662

[38] Liu K, Roth S, Duesberg G, Wagenhals M, Journet C, Bernier P. Transport properties of singlewalled carbon nanotubes. Synthetic Metals. 1999;**103**:25132514. DOI: 10.1016/ S03796779(98)010819

[39] Eletskii AV, Knizhnik AA, Potapkin BV, Kenny JM. Electrical characteristics of carbon nanotube doped composites. PhysicsUspekhi. 2015;**58**:209251. DOI: 10.3367/ UFNe.0185.201503a.0225

[40] Stahl H, Appenzeller J, Martel R, Avouris P, Lengeler B. Intertube coupling in ropes of singlewall carbon nanotubes. Physical Review Letters. 2000;**85**:51865189

[41] Krstić V, Roth S, Burghard M. Phase breaking in threeterminal contacted singlewalled carbon nanotube bundles. Physical Review B. 2000;**62**:R16352R16355. DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevB.62.R16353

[42] Park JG, Kim GT, Park JH, Yu HY, McIntosh G, Krstic V, et al. Quantum transport in lowdimensional organic nanostructures. Thin Solid Films. 2001;**393**:161167. DOI: 10.1016/ S00406090(01)010641

[43] Fischer JE, Dai H, Thess A, Lee R, Hanjani NM, Dehaas DL, et al. Metallic resistivity in crystalline ropes of singlewall carbon nanotubes. Physical Review B. 1997;**55**:R4921R4924. DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevB.55.R4921

[44] Kaiser AB, Park YW, Kim GT, Choi ES, Düsberg G, Roth S. Electronic transport in carbon nanotube ropes and mats. Synthetic Metals. 1999;**103**:25472550. DOI: 10.1016/ S03796779(98)002227

[45] Kaiser AB, Düsberg G, Roth S. Heterogeneous model for conduction in carbon nanotubes. Physical Review B. 1998;**57**:14181421. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1418

[46] Kim GT, Jhang SH, Park JG, Park YW, Roth S. Nonohmic current–voltage characteristics in singlewall carbon nanotube network. Synthetic Metals. 2001;**117**:123126. DOI: 10.1016/ S03796779(00)005518

[47] Franklin NR, Dai H. An enhanced CVD approach to extensive nanotube networks with directionality. Advanced Materials. 2000;**12**:890894. DOI: 10.1002/15214095(200006)12:12 <890:AIDADMA890>3.0.CO;2K

[48] Baumgartner G, Carrard M, Zuppiroli L, Bacsa W, de Heer WA, Forró L. Hall effect and magnetoresistance of carbon nanotube films. Physical Review B. 1997;**55**:6704 6707. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.6704

[49] Ausman KD, Piner R, Lurie O, Ruoff RS, Korobov M. Organic solvent dispersions of singlewalled carbon nanotubes: Toward solutions of pristine nanotubes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2000;**104**:89118915. DOI: 10.1021/jp002555m

[50] Krstic V, Muster J, Duesberg GS, Philipp G, Burghard M, Roth S. Electrical transport in singlewalled carbon nanotube bundles embedded in Langmuir–Blodgett monolayers. Synthetic Metals. 2000;**110**:245249. DOI: 10.1016/S03796779(99)003021

[51] Krstic V, Duesberg GS, Muster J, Burghard M, Roth S. Langmuir–Blodgett films of matrixdiluted singlewalled carbon nanotubes. Chemistry of Materials. 1998;**10**:23382340. DOI: 10.1021/cm980207f

[52] Burghard M, Krstic V, Duesberg GS, Philipp G, Muster J, Roth S. Carbon SWNTs as wires and structural templates between nanoelectrodes. Synthetic Metals. 1999;**103**:25402542. DOI: 10.1016/S03796779(99)800058

[53] Sano M, Kamino A, Okamura J, Shinkai S. Selforganization of PEO*graft*singlewalled carbon nanotubes in solutions and Langmuir–Blodgett films. Langmuir. 2001;**17**:51255128. DOI: 10.1021/la010126p

[54] Holzinger M, Vostrovsky O, Hirsch A, Hennrich F, Kappes M, Weiss R, et al.

Sidewall functionalization of carbon nanotubes. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2001;**40**:4002 4005. DOI: 10.1002/15213773 (20011105)40:21<4002:AID-ANIE4002>3.0.CO;28

[55] Hirsch A. Functionalization of singlewalled carbon nanotubes. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2002;**41**:18531859. DOI: 10.1002/15213773(20020603) 41:11<1853::AIDANIE1853>3.0. CO;2N

[56] Huang W, Lin Y, Taylor S, Gaillard J, Rao AM, Sun YP. Sonicationassisted functionalization and solubilization of carbon nanotubes. Nano Letters. 2002;**2**:231234

[57] Berger C, Song Z, Li X, Wu X, Brown N, Maud D, et al. Magnetotransport in high mobility epitaxial graphene. Physica Status Solidi A: Applications and Materials Science. 2007;**204**:17461750. DOI: 10.1002/ pssa.200675352

[58] Sharapov SG, Gusynin VP, Beck H. Magnetic oscillations in planar systems with the Diraclike spectrum of quasiparticle excitations. Physical Review B. 2004;**69**:075104. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.075104

[59] Berger C, Song Z, Li X, Wu X, Brown N, Naud C, et al. Electronic confinement and coherence in patterned epitaxial graphene. Science. 2006;**312**:11911196. DOI: 10.1126/ science.1125925

[60] Kawabata A. Theory of negative magnetoresistance in threedimensional systems. Solid State Communications. 1980;**34**:431432. DOI: 10.1016/00381098(80)906444

[61] Ousset JC, Rakoto H, Broto JM, Dupuis VV, Askenazy S, Durand J, et al. Weaklocalization effects in V1−*<sup>x</sup>*Si*<sup>x</sup>* amorphous alloys with high Si content.

**163**

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes*

Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2002;**124**:760761. DOI: 10.1021/

[70] Dresselhaus PD, Papavassiliou CM, Wheeler RG, Sacks RN. Observation of spin precession in GaAs inversion layers using antilocalization. Physical Review Letters. 1992;**68**:106109. DOI: 10.1103/

[71] Chen GL, Han J, Huang TT, Datta S, Janes DB. Observation of the interfacialfieldinduced weak antilocalization in InAs quantum structures. Physical Review B. 1993;**47**:40844087. DOI:

Ohyama T, Ishida S, Satoh K, Kusaka T, et al. Comparison of magnetoconductance of the δdoped layer and bulk crystal of Si:Sb in the weak localization regime. Physica B: Condensed Matter. 2001;**302-303**:711. DOI: 10.1016/

ja016954m

PhysRevLett.68.106

10.1103/PhysRevB.47.4084

[72] Fujimoto A, Kobori H,

S09214526(01)003994

[73] Liu K, Roth S, Düsberg GS, Kim GT, Popa D, Mukhopadhyay K, et al. Antilocalization in multiwalled

Review B. 2000;**61**:23752379. DOI:

[74] Wang G, Tan Z, Liu X, Chawda S, Koo JS, Samuilov V, et al. Conducting MWNT/poly(vinyl acetate) composite

carbon nanotubes. Physical

10.1103/PhysRevB.61.2375

nanofibres by electrospinning. Nanotechnology. 2006;**17**:58295835. DOI: 10.1088/09574484/17/23/019

[75] Chen WP, Zhao ZG, Liu XW, Zhang ZX, Suo CG. A capacitive humidity sensor based on multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Sensors.

2009;**9**:74317444. DOI: 10.3390/

DOI: 10.1166/sl.2005.001

[76] Lee CY, Lee GB. Humidity sensors: A review. Sensor Letters. 2005;**3**:114.

s90907431

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

Physical Review B. 1987;**36**:54325436. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.5432

[62] Ulmet JP, Bachère L, Askenazy S, Ousset JC. Negative magnetoresistance

in some dimethyltrimethylenetetraselenafulvalenium salts: A signature of weak localization effects. Physical Review B. 1988;**38**:77827788. DOI: 10.1103/

PhysRevB.38.7782

1985;**62**:10211029

PhysRevLett.60.1566

[65] Sheng P. Fluctuationinduced tunneling conduction in disordered materials. Physical Review B. 1980;**21**:21802195. DOI:

10.1103/PhysRevB.21.2180

JPSJ.26.1407

10.1039/B201013P

[66] Yasawa K. Negative magnetoresistance in pyrolytic carbons. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. 1969;**26**:14071419. DOI: 10.1143/

[67] Bahr JL, Tour JM. Covalent chemistry of singlewall carbon nanotubes. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2002;**12**:19521958. DOI:

[68] Chiu PW, Duesberg GS, DettlaffWeglikowska U, Roth S. Interconnection of carbon nanotubes by chemical functionalization. Applied Physics Letters. 2002;**80**:38113813.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1480487

[69] Georgakilas V, Kordatos K, Prato M, Guldi DM, Holzinger M, Hirsch A. Organic functionalization of carbon nanotubes.

[63] Nguyen VI, Spivak BZ, Shklovskii BI. Tunnel hopping in disordered systems. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics.

[64] Sivan U, EntinWohlman O, Imry Y. Orbital magnetoconductance in the variablerange–hopping regime. Physical Review Letters. 1988;**60**:15661569. DOI: 10.1103/

*Electron Transport in the Assemblies of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89937*

Physical Review B. 1987;**36**:54325436. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.5432

*Perspective of Carbon Nanotubes*

[47] Franklin NR, Dai H. An enhanced CVD approach to extensive nanotube networks with directionality. Advanced Materials. 2000;**12**:890894. DOI: 10.1002/15214095(200006)12:12 <890:AIDADMA890>3.0.CO;2K

Sidewall functionalization of carbon nanotubes. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2001;**40**:4002 4005. DOI: 10.1002/15213773 (20011105)40:21<4002:AID-ANIE4002>3.0.CO;28

[55] Hirsch A. Functionalization of singlewalled carbon nanotubes. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2002;**41**:18531859. DOI: 10.1002/15213773(20020603) 41:11<1853::AIDANIE1853>3.0.

[56] Huang W, Lin Y, Taylor S, Gaillard J, Rao AM, Sun YP. Sonicationassisted functionalization and solubilization of carbon nanotubes. Nano Letters.

CO;2N

2002;**2**:231234

pssa.200675352

science.1125925

[57] Berger C, Song Z, Li X, Wu X, Brown N, Maud D, et al. Magnetotransport in high mobility epitaxial graphene. Physica Status Solidi A: Applications and Materials Science. 2007;**204**:17461750. DOI: 10.1002/

[58] Sharapov SG, Gusynin VP,

[59] Berger C, Song Z, Li X, Wu X, Brown N, Naud C, et al. Electronic confinement and coherence in

patterned epitaxial graphene. Science. 2006;**312**:11911196. DOI: 10.1126/

[60] Kawabata A. Theory of negative

[61] Ousset JC, Rakoto H, Broto JM, Dupuis VV, Askenazy S, Durand J, et al. Weaklocalization effects in V1−*<sup>x</sup>*Si*<sup>x</sup>* amorphous alloys with high Si content.

magnetoresistance in threedimensional systems. Solid State Communications. 1980;**34**:431432. DOI: 10.1016/00381098(80)906444

Beck H. Magnetic oscillations in planar systems with the Diraclike spectrum of quasiparticle excitations. Physical Review B. 2004;**69**:075104. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.075104

[48] Baumgartner G, Carrard M,

Heer WA, Forró L. Hall effect and magnetoresistance of carbon nanotube films. Physical Review B. 1997;**55**:6704 6707. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.6704

[49] Ausman KD, Piner R, Lurie O, Ruoff RS, Korobov M. Organic solvent dispersions of singlewalled carbon nanotubes: Toward solutions of pristine nanotubes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2000;**104**:89118915.

[50] Krstic V, Muster J, Duesberg GS, Philipp G, Burghard M, Roth S. Electrical transport in singlewalled carbon nanotube bundles embedded in Langmuir–Blodgett monolayers. Synthetic Metals. 2000;**110**:245249. DOI: 10.1016/S03796779(99)003021

[51] Krstic V, Duesberg GS, Muster J, Burghard M, Roth S. Langmuir–Blodgett films of matrixdiluted singlewalled carbon nanotubes. Chemistry of Materials. 1998;**10**:23382340. DOI:

[52] Burghard M, Krstic V, Duesberg GS, Philipp G, Muster J, Roth S. Carbon SWNTs as wires and structural templates between nanoelectrodes. Synthetic Metals. 1999;**103**:25402542. DOI: 10.1016/S03796779(99)800058

[53] Sano M, Kamino A, Okamura J, Shinkai S. Selforganization of PEO*graft*singlewalled carbon nanotubes in solutions and Langmuir–Blodgett films. Langmuir. 2001;**17**:51255128. DOI:

[54] Holzinger M, Vostrovsky O, Hirsch A, Hennrich F, Kappes M, Weiss R, et al.

Zuppiroli L, Bacsa W, de

DOI: 10.1021/jp002555m

10.1021/cm980207f

10.1021/la010126p

**162**

[62] Ulmet JP, Bachère L, Askenazy S, Ousset JC. Negative magnetoresistance in some dimethyltrimethylenetetraselenafulvalenium salts: A signature of weak localization effects. Physical Review B. 1988;**38**:77827788. DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevB.38.7782

[63] Nguyen VI, Spivak BZ, Shklovskii BI. Tunnel hopping in disordered systems. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics. 1985;**62**:10211029

[64] Sivan U, EntinWohlman O, Imry Y. Orbital magnetoconductance in the variablerange–hopping regime. Physical Review Letters. 1988;**60**:15661569. DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.60.1566

[65] Sheng P. Fluctuationinduced tunneling conduction in disordered materials. Physical Review B. 1980;**21**:21802195. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.21.2180

[66] Yasawa K. Negative magnetoresistance in pyrolytic carbons. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. 1969;**26**:14071419. DOI: 10.1143/ JPSJ.26.1407

[67] Bahr JL, Tour JM. Covalent chemistry of singlewall carbon nanotubes. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2002;**12**:19521958. DOI: 10.1039/B201013P

[68] Chiu PW, Duesberg GS, DettlaffWeglikowska U, Roth S. Interconnection of carbon nanotubes by chemical functionalization. Applied Physics Letters. 2002;**80**:38113813. DOI: 10.1063/1.1480487

[69] Georgakilas V, Kordatos K, Prato M, Guldi DM, Holzinger M, Hirsch A. Organic functionalization of carbon nanotubes.

Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2002;**124**:760761. DOI: 10.1021/ ja016954m

[70] Dresselhaus PD, Papavassiliou CM, Wheeler RG, Sacks RN. Observation of spin precession in GaAs inversion layers using antilocalization. Physical Review Letters. 1992;**68**:106109. DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.68.106

[71] Chen GL, Han J, Huang TT, Datta S, Janes DB. Observation of the interfacialfieldinduced weak antilocalization in InAs quantum structures. Physical Review B. 1993;**47**:40844087. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.4084

[72] Fujimoto A, Kobori H, Ohyama T, Ishida S, Satoh K, Kusaka T, et al. Comparison of magnetoconductance of the δdoped layer and bulk crystal of Si:Sb in the weak localization regime. Physica B: Condensed Matter. 2001;**302-303**:711. DOI: 10.1016/ S09214526(01)003994

[73] Liu K, Roth S, Düsberg GS, Kim GT, Popa D, Mukhopadhyay K, et al. Antilocalization in multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Physical Review B. 2000;**61**:23752379. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.2375

[74] Wang G, Tan Z, Liu X, Chawda S, Koo JS, Samuilov V, et al. Conducting MWNT/poly(vinyl acetate) composite nanofibres by electrospinning. Nanotechnology. 2006;**17**:58295835. DOI: 10.1088/09574484/17/23/019

[75] Chen WP, Zhao ZG, Liu XW, Zhang ZX, Suo CG. A capacitive humidity sensor based on multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Sensors. 2009;**9**:74317444. DOI: 10.3390/ s90907431

[76] Lee CY, Lee GB. Humidity sensors: A review. Sensor Letters. 2005;**3**:114. DOI: 10.1166/sl.2005.001

**165**

**Chapter 10**

**Abstract**

**1. Introduction**

Applications

Surface Functionalization of

Carbon Nanotubes for Energy

*Mohamed R. Berber, Inas H. Hafez and Mohamad Y. Mustafa*

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are receiving a great deal of attention as a catalyst support for different energy applications, due to their high surface area and high conductivity. Recent literature studies have shown that the application of CNTs mainly depends on their surface functionalization process. Typically, pristine CNTs (as produced) have no functional groups, which is usually considered as an obstacle to their widespread application. In this chapter, we highlight the different techniques used to functionalize the surface of CNTs, including physical and chemical functionalization processes. We show the advantages and the drawbacks of the different functionalization processes. Additionally, we explain in detail the different techniques used to characterize the CNTs before and after functionalization processes. Furthermore, we focus on polymer wrapping techniques of CNTs to create active nanocomposite materials for energy applications, in particular the applications in the agriculture field to fight pollution and make farming activity easier and more efficient.

**Keywords:** physical functionalization, chemical functionalization, carbon nanotubes, polymers, fuel cells, energy applications for agriculture engineering

The birth of nanoscience has emerged new pathways for developing new materials with new target properties for different energy applications. Among these

CNTs have been discovered by Ijima in 1991 [1]. They are made of graphene sheets which are rolled up to form nanostructured tubes (**Figure 1)**. CNTs are receiving a great deal of attention for energy applications due to their high electrical conductivity, low density, large specific surface area, high chemical and thermal stability, as well as their remarkable mechanical properties [2]. CNTs are synthesized by various techniques, including chemical vapor deposition [3] **(Figure 2a)** and arc-discharge method [4] (**Figure 2b)**. The as-produced (pristine) CNTs possess a hydrophobic nature due to the high interaction forces (van der Waals force and bundling) between the nanotubes (formation of aggregates). The presence of these aggregates in addition to the low solubility of CNTs shows major drawbacks for engineering useful materials based on CNTs. Thus, a functionalization process is required to overcome the CNT bundle structure which is usually

promising materials are the carbon nanotubes (CNTs).

obstacle their real world applications.

## **Chapter 10**
