Forest Degradation and its Issues in the Tropics

*Forest Degradation Around the World*

function of the temperate forest ecosystem. Environmental Pollution (1970). 1974;**6**(2):111-129. DOI: 10.1016/0013-9327(74)90027-5

by air pollution. Korean Journal of Ecology. 1993;**16**(3):305-316

[106] Freedman B. Environmental Ecology: The Ecological Effects of Pollution, Disturbance, and Other Stresses. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic

[107] Gunn JM. Restoration and Recovery of an Industrial Region. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995. 345 p

[108] Korea Ministry of Environment. A White Book on Environment. Korea Ministry of Environment; 2005. 720 p

[109] Olson RL Jr, Sharpe PJH. Toward a mechanistic understanding of plant responses to SO2. In: Winner WE, Mooney HA, Goldstein RA, editors. Sulfur Dioxide and Vegetation. Stanford:

[110] Whittaker RH. Communities and Ecosystems. New York: Macmillan;

[111] Ricklefs RE. The Economy of Nature. New York: W.H. Freeman and

Stanford University Press; 1985.

pp. 507-520

1975. 162 p

Co.; 2010. 620 p

Press; 1995. 619 p

[105] Moravčík P. Development of new forest stands after a large scale forest decline in the Krušné hory Mountains. Ecological Engineering. 1994;**3**(1):57-69. DOI: 10.1016/0925-8574(94)90012-4

[97] McClenahen JR. Community changes in a deciduous forest exposed to air pollution. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 1978;**8**(4):432-438. DOI:

[98] Scale PR. Changes in plant communities with distance from an SO2 source. Effects of air pollutants on Mediterranean and temperate forest ecosystems. General Technical Report

[99] Lee CS, Hong SK, You YH, Kim JE, Moon JS, editors. Landscape structure in the green belt around the metropolitan area of Seoul, Korea. In: Proceedings of the International Association of Vegetation Science Symposium. 2000.

[100] Runkle JR. Disturbance regimes in temperate forests. In: Pickett STA, White PS, editors. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. New York: Academic press,

[101] Walker LR, Walker J, Hobbs RJ. Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession. New York, NY: Springer;

[102] Kozlowski TT. Measurement of effects of environmental and industrial chemicals on terrestrial plants. Methods for Estimating Risk of Chemical Injury: Human and Non-Human Biota and Ecosystems, Scope. 1985;**35**:573-609

[103] Shugart HH, McLaughlin SB Jr. Modeling SO2 Effects on Forest Growth and Community Dynamics. California: Stanford University Press; 1985. 494 p

[104] Lee CS. Regeneration of *Pinus densiflora* community around the Yeocheon industrial complex disturbed

10.1139/x78-063

PSW-43. 1980. p. 248

pp. 230-233

Inc.; 1985. p. 17-33

2007. 190 p

**94**

**97**

generations.

**Chapter 6**

Prologue: Sustainable

*Gabriel de Oliveira, Nathaniel A. Brunsell,* 

**1. Tropical deforestation and its actors**

*Yosio E. Shimabukuro and Carlos A.C. dos Santos*

ing countries and their need to make economic growth at all costs.

Most of the funding to protect the tropical forests against deforestation in developing countries comes from developed countries that need to achieve their own goals on reducing emissions of carbon to the atmosphere, thus mitigating the impacts caused by climate change. This started in the mid-1990s with the Kyoto Protocol and has been ratified more recently, in 2015, with the Paris Agreement. There has been a considerable scepticism, especially in the population of third world countries, about the fact that developed countries feel entitled to the areas covered by tropical forests, especially the Amazon, because they fund programs to protect and study these regions, and they are neither completely wrong nor completely right. There are two things to be highlighted here. The first is that no country should feel entitled to the vast and luxurious Amazon forest just because they send funds for protection and research. The second is that yet the majority of the Amazon forest belongs to Brazil, and for the indigenous people who live there, this ecosystem acts as a large carbon sink and an enormous source of water to the atmosphere and is of fundamental importance to the survival of future

Development, Economic Growth

We are experiencing, especially in the past few years, critical discussions, both in science and in the general public, about the role of tropical forests to support a more sustainable world, and how we can act to protect these ecosystems [1, 2]. There is a significant concern, especially in developing countries, on how to obtain economic growth using the natural resources within the areas covered by pristine forests without compromising future generations to meet their own needs. The sustainable development is based on the balance or trade-offs between economic, environmental and social sustainability. It seems to be a simple equation; however, it is important to consider that many actors are included in these three pillars, and to find a common point between them is often complicated. So, how to convince a farmer that it is not possible to extend the area used for agriculture because there is a natural preserved area nearby? Or how to convince mining companies that it is not possible to clear-cut the forest for oil/natural gas exploration since the land is located within an indigenous reserve? And how to convince the urban population that is better to preserve the forest standing instead of producing meat or corn for their food needs or oil/natural gas for their transportation? As we can see, this balancing is not easy to achieve, especially when we talk about develop-

and the Fate of Tropical Forests
