**Author details**

Carine J. Yi1 \* and Tim Park<sup>2</sup>

1 R. Park and Associates Inc., Toronto, Canada

2 PR Immigration and TR Consulting Canada, Toronto, Canada

\*Address all correspondence to: cyi.rpa@gmail.com

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**53**

*Functional and Technical Methods of Information and Risk Communication*

acase.co.kr/2015/06/02/mers2/ comment-page-1/#comment-11727

[10] Lloyds. Lloyd's City Risk Index 2015-2025. 2015. Available from: https://

[11] Seoul Metropolitan Government. City Overview. Available from: http://english.seoul.go.kr/ get-to-know-us/seoul-views/ meaning-of-seoul/4-population/

[12] The Seoul Institute. Seoul Research Data Service. Available from: http://

[13] Seoul Metropolitan Government. Opened Data Plaza. Available from:

[14] Timmons H. The World's Largest City Economies. 2018. Available from: https://www.theatlas.com/charts/ ryc\_Xtn\_ [Accessed: November 9, 2018]

[15] Trujillo JL, Parilla J. Redefining Global Cities—The Seven Types of Global Metro Economies. The Brookings

Institution, Metropolitan Policy

[17] Coburn A. The Lloyd's City Risk Index 2015-2025—Special Methodology Seminar Lloyd's City Risk Index—Methodology and Usage of City Economy Risk Analysis. 2015. Available from: https://www.jbs.cam. ac.uk/fileadmin/user\_upload/research/ centres/risk/downloads/150903\_

[16] Statistics Korea, Social Research Results for 2018 (Family, Education, Health, Safety, Environment). 2018. Available from: http://kostat.go.kr/ assist/synap/preview/skin/doc. html?fn=synapview371501\_1&rs=/ assist/synap/preview [Accessed:

Program; 2016

November 5, 2018]

understandrisk.org/publication/ lloyds-city-risk-index-2015-2025/

[Accessed: July 6, 2015]

data.si.re.kr/node/337

http://data.seoul.go.kr/

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84488*

[1] United Nations. The World's Cities in

[2] Renn O. Risk Governance—Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World, London. Sterling, VA: Earthscan in the

2016. United Nations; 2017

**References**

UK and USA; 2008. 476 p

[3] Renn O. Risk communication: Insight and requirement for designing succesfull communication programs on health and environmental hazards. In: Heath RL, Dan O'Hair H, editors. Strategies for Overcoming Challenges to Effective Risk Communication. New York: Routledge; 2009

[4] Sjöberg L. Factors in risk perception.

[5] Baram M. The right to know and the duty to disclose hazard information. American Journal of Public Health.

[6] Yi C, Kuri M, Imamura F, Murao O, Iuchi K, Izumi T, et al. HFA IRIDeS Review Preliminary Report—Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters. Japan: International Research Institute of Disaster Science (IRIDeS), Tohoku

[7] Yi C, Kuri M. The prospect of online communication in the event of a disaster. Journal of Risk Research.

[8] Wachinger G, Renn O, Begg C, Kuhlicke C. The risk perception paradox—Implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis.

Risk Analysis. 2000;**20**(1):1-12

1984;**74**(4):385-390

University; 2013

2016;**19**(7):951-963

2013;**33**(6):1049-1065

[9] Lim S. Acase—[MERS

Correspondence 2] Tell the Truth Which We Knew Through Confirmation Process. 2015. Available from: https://

*Functional and Technical Methods of Information and Risk Communication DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84488*
