• Sonority principles/stress

From onset cyclic permutations (3, 1, 5), (3,5), (1,5), (3,1), (3,4) we can notice the important role of prevocalic approximants (r, j, w, l) matching both gestural C-center phasing and SSP principle (increasing sonority at the contact with the nucleus). Only one cluster cycle is violating SSP (3, 1/fricative stops), it relies on the laryngeal feature (voicing) harmony on onset, lexical onset/coda unvoiced/voiced co-occurrences seem to be the rule of a harmony balance.

*3.2.3 Onset semantic structure for iconicity*

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89943*

Beyond the debate between lexicon (defining the dictionary) and encyclopedia that opposes structuralists, cognitive semanticists and semioticians [80–83] as to what distinguishes the cognitive frame from proper semic/sememic or semantemic/ classematic poles of morpheme/lexeme boundaries [84, 85], recent analytical accounts in minimalism/syntax and biolinguistics focus on the biosemiotic nature of meaning and action merge specification [86] within the debate of C-I interface (conceptual-intentional interface) [87, 88]. Since foundational Millikan's notion of

**The semantic-conceptual structure of Spread /spr/ (multilayer frame): "he** *spread* **a tomato bowl on the floor then** *stared* **at his friend mopping reddish**

*Semic classemes***:** [+action], [+source], [+predicate], [+manner], [+ process],

*Sememic configuration (specific taxemes)***:** //external//, //release//, //target//,

*Frame name:* Dispersal, *Core elements: agent, cause, individuals, result, ---,*

**vegetables" (from an experiment: Bakrim 2019 in progress).**

• **Dictionary:**

*Peripheral:* place

• **Encyclopedia (Frame):**

[+target]

//topic//

**119**

Biosemantics, we gained more interest in the way teleological/Intentional categories are mapped on both biological/structural forms to shape meaning. Moreover, recent studies [89] based on neuro-imaging integration, attempt to link non-linguistic and linguistic information to syntax levels or Syntax Driven Semantics. We would like to propose a frame of the semantic mapping based on permutative computation on the intersection of multilayer semantics [90] on lexeme/morpheme interactions. These permutations select iconic cues on the lexicon encoded on both

*The Biolinguistic Instantiation: Form to Meaning in Brain/Syllable Interactions*

bio-schemes "instantiation" and the structure in a modular way:

*3.2.3.1 2/3 clustering permutations*

Stress considerations are more sensitive to the hypothesis of stress-sonority interactions and the so called *sonority driven stress* which integrates stress information in a supra-segmental-prosodic level [76]. Stress Encapsulation Universals seems to be violated in sonorant clusters and feature [+/ sonorant] can be derived in stress. Onset structures are then supposed to influence vowel stress of the syllable.

What is the iconicity principle from this phonological/prosodic information on both computation of the lexicon based on the hypothesis of the bio-syllable and mental syllabary. Instructions implying both conceptual frames (verb frames: language/world segmentation) and semic structures (language semantic structure) seem to map (onto) and distribute lexical semantic meaning on the phonological prosodic structure based on these previous hypotheses:

### *3.2.2.6 First hypotheses*


#### *3.2.2.7 Second hypotheses*


To describe the semantic articulation of both general/specifying, lexeme/encyclopedia frames we will define some patterns on onset position. We first postulate that these distinctions relate to the nature of syllable/gesture interaction as encoding both concepts and semantic structure of the lexicon relying on bioschematic principles to be discussed more accurately in the next section. Secondly, encyclopedic instruction integrates both taxemic (sememic taxemes) organization of the verb or its sememic segmentation of the action continuum specifying its semantic organization and its distribution nuclei as a cognitive frame—this specificity distinguishes verb sememes from other sememes—[77–79].

*The Biolinguistic Instantiation: Form to Meaning in Brain/Syllable Interactions DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89943*

#### *3.2.3 Onset semantic structure for iconicity*

#### *3.2.3.1 2/3 clustering permutations*

• Sonority principles/stress

*Cognitive and Intermedial Semiotics*

syllable.

*3.2.2.6 First hypotheses*

*3.2.2.7 Second hypotheses*

• Clusters can specify the aspect

iconic markers on coda position

and opts for catalysis.

**118**

co-occurrences seem to be the rule of a harmony balance.

prosodic structure based on these previous hypotheses:

sublogic principles of the semantic structure

• Clusters indicate the diathesis distribution of the process

From onset cyclic permutations (3, 1, 5), (3,5), (1,5), (3,1), (3,4) we can notice the important role of prevocalic approximants (r, j, w, l) matching both gestural C-center phasing and SSP principle (increasing sonority at the contact with the nucleus). Only one cluster cycle is violating SSP (3, 1/fricative stops), it relies on the laryngeal feature (voicing) harmony on onset, lexical onset/coda unvoiced/voiced

Stress considerations are more sensitive to the hypothesis of stress-sonority interactions and the so called *sonority driven stress* which integrates stress information in a supra-segmental-prosodic level [76]. Stress Encapsulation Universals seems to be violated in sonorant clusters and feature [+/ sonorant] can be derived in stress. Onset structures are then supposed to influence vowel stress of the

What is the iconicity principle from this phonological/prosodic information on both computation of the lexicon based on the hypothesis of the bio-syllable and mental syllabary. Instructions implying both conceptual frames (verb frames: language/world segmentation) and semic structures (language semantic structure) seem to map (onto) and distribute lexical semantic meaning on the phonological

• Clusters are valence—case determining which derive the verb argument

• Position specifies classematic categories integrating both encyclopedic and

• Position could be articulated (onset/coda) in resultative processes adding

• Recognition in acquisition is sensitive to both encyclopedic/lexeme instructions

To describe the semantic articulation of both general/specifying, lexeme/encyclopedia frames we will define some patterns on onset position. We first postulate that these distinctions relate to the nature of syllable/gesture interaction as encoding both concepts and semantic structure of the lexicon relying on bioschematic principles to be discussed more accurately in the next section. Secondly, encyclopedic instruction integrates both taxemic (sememic taxemes) organization of the verb or its sememic segmentation of the action continuum specifying its semantic organization and its distribution nuclei as a cognitive frame—this speci-

• Position can specify the case and actant roles within the process

ficity distinguishes verb sememes from other sememes—[77–79].

Beyond the debate between lexicon (defining the dictionary) and encyclopedia that opposes structuralists, cognitive semanticists and semioticians [80–83] as to what distinguishes the cognitive frame from proper semic/sememic or semantemic/ classematic poles of morpheme/lexeme boundaries [84, 85], recent analytical accounts in minimalism/syntax and biolinguistics focus on the biosemiotic nature of meaning and action merge specification [86] within the debate of C-I interface (conceptual-intentional interface) [87, 88]. Since foundational Millikan's notion of Biosemantics, we gained more interest in the way teleological/Intentional categories are mapped on both biological/structural forms to shape meaning. Moreover, recent studies [89] based on neuro-imaging integration, attempt to link non-linguistic and linguistic information to syntax levels or Syntax Driven Semantics.

We would like to propose a frame of the semantic mapping based on permutative computation on the intersection of multilayer semantics [90] on lexeme/morpheme interactions. These permutations select iconic cues on the lexicon encoded on both bio-schemes "instantiation" and the structure in a modular way:

**The semantic-conceptual structure of Spread /spr/ (multilayer frame): "he** *spread* **a tomato bowl on the floor then** *stared* **at his friend mopping reddish vegetables" (from an experiment: Bakrim 2019 in progress).**

• **Dictionary:**

*Semic classemes***:** [+action], [+source], [+predicate], [+manner], [+ process], [+target]

*Sememic configuration (specific taxemes)***:** //external//, //release//, //target//, //topic//

#### • **Encyclopedia (Frame):**

*Frame name:* Dispersal, *Core elements: agent, cause, individuals, result, ---, Peripheral:* place
