**Author details**

Marta Silvera-Roig Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Madrid, Spain

\*Address all correspondence to: msilvera@ucm.es

© 2020 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**11**

Press; 1996

*Cognitive Semiotics and Conceptual Blend: A Case Study from* The Crying of Lot 49

approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics.

[12] Geeraerts D, editor. Cognitive Linguistics. Basic Readings. Berlin:

[13] Croft W, Cruse DA. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge

[15] Grady J, Oakley T, Coulson S. Blending and metaphor. In: Gibbs R, Steen G, editors. Metaphor in

Ámsterdam; 1999. pp. 101-124

Press/John Benjamins; 1992

[17] Grodal T. Embodied Visions: Evolution, Emotion, Culture, and Film. New York: Oxford University Press;

[18] Wheeler W. The Whole Creature: Complexity, Biosemiotics and the Evolution of Culture. London: Lawrence

[19] Jiménez-Ortega L et al. Effects of reader's facial expression on syntactic processing: A brain potential study.

[20] Gregersen NH. From Complexity to Life: On the Emergence of Life and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University

Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins:

[16] Brandt PA. La Charpente modale du sens. In: Pour une sémio-linguistique morphogénétique et dynamique. Aarhus/Ámsterdam: Aarhus University

[14] Fauconnier G, Turner M. Blending as a central process of grammar. In: Goldberg A, editor. Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information; 1996.

Mouton de Gruyter; 2006

University Press; 2004

pp. 113-129

2009

and Wishart; 2006

Press; 2003

Brain Research. 2020:1736

2005;**3**(1):216-249

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92606*

[1] Zlatev J. Cognitive semiotics: An emerging field for the transdisciplinary study of meaning. Public Journal of

Semiotics. 2012;**4**(1):2-24

**References**

pp. 202-251

Chicago Press; 1980

Chicago Press; 1989

Chicago Press; 1987

York: Basic Books; 1999

[8] Lakoff G, Núñez R. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. Nueva York: Basic Books; 2000

[9] Lakoff G. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don't. Chicago: University of Chicago

[10] Langacker RW. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1987

[11] Brandt L, Brandt PA. Making sense of a blend: A cognitive-semiotic

[2] Lakoff G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1987

[3] Lakoff G. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: Ortony A, editor. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.

[4] Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of

[5] Lakoff G, Turner M. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: The University of

[6] Johnson M. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Reason and Imagination. Chicago: University of

[7] Lakoff G, Johnson M. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. Nueva

*Cognitive Semiotics and Conceptual Blend: A Case Study from* The Crying of Lot 49 *DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92606*
