• **the gestural sub-segmental organization is a topological-neurobiological model of instantiation**

We already know the evidence of construction grammars and verb argument on

Neural schematization has been posited as a theoretical model called Schema

Copying a phonological—prosodic form onto gestural levels require specific schemas for sequencing, neural maps for copying/deleting or copying/binding enabling both the gestural-phonological interface, the gestural-lexical interface for a

The representation of hierarchical language schemas (trees, skeletal events, semantic arborescence, featural arborescence, etc.) is a computational model supported by both computation vs algorithm distribution of minimalist syntax theory and many recent theories of language [108]. Motor hierarchy and abstraction hierarchy ground in mirror neurons frame or adopt other neurocognitive approaches. Links have been advocated between Mirror neuron system and the motor theory of speech perception within the consideration that hierarchy in instantiation relates always on the role of abstract higher levels. This model of consciousness and abstraction [109] includes motor control hierarchy and representation (derivation) into one framework. Moreover, a strict distinction is needed between anatomical location and hierarchy principles. Beyond actual dual models of speech (DIVA model [110]). We will thus refer to the hierarchical model

determined sequence. It has been proven that mirror neurons form hidden

of Dana Ballard suggesting a specification of speech sensory-motor brain

**Sensory-motor representation Analytical-computation** Selection Gestures probabilities/scores Segmental/auto-segmental analysis/events Runtime Phasing sequences/co-articulation Prosodic derivation (accent/weight)

Routines Acoustic spectral modulation Acoustic formant/harmony analysis Calibration Motor control circuitry Feed-forward/feedback systems

Neural level Mapping/mirror neuron system Neural scheme

Morpho-lexical distinctiveness/conceptual-

semantic frames

sequences [107] of sensory-motor observed/enacted actions.

theory by Arbib's et al. [106], arguing that this last is the basis for cognitive knowledge or a system of schemata enabling the relation between action and interpretation. Production/perception neural maps are responsible of translating cognitive schemata (or their assemblage) of speech components into sensory-motor

the link between action verb semantics and mirror neuron system [33, 104]. It implies graphs for visual/linguistic mapping, both universal and typologically determined [105]. Activation and inhibition relate event structure thank either neural group connections (mental inhibitors) or allow a flow of ions (synaptic frame).

*The Biolinguistic Instantiation: Form to Meaning in Brain/Syllable Interactions*

**4.3 Instantiation as schematization**

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89943*

*4.3.1 Neural maps for sequencing*

*4.3.2 Hierarchization*

abstraction.

**127**

**Operating system**

Behavior Framing the gestural model of the

lexicon

images.

Represented representation is this complex schematization of a mapping model suggesting first the topological mathematical organization of the articulatory/vocal tract organic principle. Beyond the formant principle and its acoustic physical implication, the gestural mode of speech, on the syllable-lexicon level is a topological model of dynamics (morpho-dynamics) that articulates formal representations of speech production/perception in a bidirectional way: what would be the implication of the permutation in a topological space represented by vocal tract/articulatory systems on form and selection events? It supposes a biological/topological interface of both semio/morphogenesis [102]. On the other hand, mental lexicon/mental syllable have been suggested as models of both generative syntax and phonological specification of the syntactic device. From the psycholinguistic point of view [103], both encoding/computing may enhance the acoustic realization of words.

It entails the activation of a neural image of structure imitating structure and structure imitating the world (anamorphosis and morphosis). Iconicity would then be a specific module for internal lexicon and syntactic structures.

We would henceforth expose a threefold model of instantiation:

