*3.2.2.2 3/2 deletion principle: English onsets*

/skr/ ! /kr/

• T2 (C): gestural /feature prosodic structures: <puzzle>

*Cognitive and Intermedial Semiotics*

Based on both gestural and phonological/prosodic structures, we would first pinpoint that the phasing rules of prevocalic/postvolcalic consonants (see Browman et al.) in clusters are restricted by the vowel (the so called C-center effect) which makes both coda-onset consonants dependent on vowel (nucleus) timing. We then hypothesize a lexical timing process related to sensitiveness. This would bring us to analyze both mirroring effect of 2/3 rules and their permutations within the

We hypothesize that 2/3 onset rules in English are gestural/featural deletion modes adding/deleting rules from both lexicon/syllable analysis oriented toward semantic clustering and conceptual framing of the verbs. We first, would like to underline that seen from the segmental point of view, addition/deletion rules of SSP

phonotactic frame.

**114**

*3.2.2 Phonotactic and lexical-semantic iconicity*

*3.2.2.1 Onset deletion-adding rules: 2/3 clusters*

	- a. Only 2 (OF) > 3 (OS) <1 (A)
	- b. And 3 (OS) <1 (A)

Are elicited adopting the frame of both optimality theory [69] and the sonority/ weight derivation hierarchy, (a) and (b) optimal rules we emphasize in the following:


Where: weight is ruled by head/constituents and hierarchy levels on the syllable. It also emphasizes the lexical basis of deletion/adding principle.

*3.2.2.3 2/3 deletion principle: English codas*

**/mbl/** ! **/bl/** Gestural principle:

• Closing/opening the glottis

SSP principle

• Preserving the SSP postvolcalic coda

Sequencing deletion: from the rule 3 2 1 Obstruent Stop OS (3) ------ A (2) ----- nasals (1) Only: N (1) > OS (3) <A (2) And OS 3 < A 2 Are elicited.

Possible universal clustering on onset/coda positions could be calculated

value or deriving algebraically the orbit and the cycles from a set of 1 to n ele-

Furthermore, this universal principle grounding in both SSP and categorical perception [75]—nonetheless, the last study brings another evidence of variable categorical behavior in perception for clusters. It relies on a more biological robust basis for neural processing of categories, along with the gestural combinatory basis allowing us to predict from what we term SQP (sequencing permutation model) a

> **Cluster inventory for selecting iconicity clusters**

• (3,1,5): /spl/, /spr/ /skr/,/

• (1,5): /gl/, /gr/ /kl/, /tw/, / br/, /kw/, /pl/, /bl/, /dr/, /

• (4,1,5): /mpl/, /ndl/, /mbl/

• (1,5): /kl/, /gl/, /bl/, /dl/, /

• (4,1): /mp/, /mb/, /nd/, /

str/, /skw/

,/ᵑgl/, /ᵑkl/

pl/

nt/

*(1, 2, 3, 4, 5) stand for these universal articulatory classes: 1—Aos, 2—Boa, 3—Cof, 4—Dn, 5—Ea.*

Moreover, we only focus in this article on onset/coda processes of clustering knowing that coda.onset structures of iconicity bear an important dimension in both lexical distinctiveness/statistics but also in argument and semantic structure. We also exclude singletons from our clustering perspective; the frame would be

Beyond any statistical account of onset (English), we notice other permutation processes between T2–T3 forms already discussed in the abovementioned addition/ deletion frames. Without, any symmetrical or mirroring effect, do these forms

θr/

**Lexical inventory samples**

• Splay, spread, scream, stray, squeeze

• Gleam, grab, clap, twine, breath, quell, plug, blur,

• Rumple, bundle, rumble, mingle, rankle

• Tackle, juggle, wobble, saddle, ripple

• Bump, comb, send, hint

draw, throw

• (3,5): /fl/, /sl/, /ʃr/, /sw/ • Flee, slide, shrink, sway

• (3,4): /sm/, /sn/ • Smack, sneeze

• (3,1): /sp/, /st/, /sk/ • Spare, stare, skip • (5,5): /wr/ • Wrap, write

• (3,5): /zl/, /fl/ • Dazzle, shuffle

• (5,3) /lv/ • Delve, halve, shelve • 3 singl.: /ʃ/ • Dash, mash, lash • 2 singl. /tʃ/ • Pitch, patch, catch

• (3,1): /ft/ • Shift, lift

• (3,1,5): /stl/ • Whistle

within these forms either using a schematic rotation with a selection

*The Biolinguistic Instantiation: Form to Meaning in Brain/Syllable Interactions*

specific language selection on the binary computation level:

**English permutation—class clusters for the syllable-**

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89943*

, (3,1,5), (3,4), (1,5),

ments (1–5).

**Positions/ clustering**

*1*

**117**

ONSET (3,5)<sup>1</sup>

(3,1), (5,5)

CODA (3,1,5), (4,1,5), (3,5), (1,5), (3,1), (4,1), (5,3) and 3,2

different on both onset/coda positions.

specify any phonological/prosodic or semantic processes?

*3.2.2.5 Onset structure*

singletons

After defining the deletion/adding rules from gestural to computational levels and instructions, we address in the following section the sequencing permutation models.

*3.2.2.4 Inversion rules framework and Sequencing Permutations (SQP)*

• T 1 (O) / T2 (O): T1 (C) and inventories:

Many inversion rules have been suggested as universal rules of onset/coda positions [72]. On the other hand, we have adopted a mathematical permutation model to address the phonotactic gestural/featural components and their class selections.

If the set ECO is the set of natural articulatory classes defined by its sonority scale for the syllable, then the group of possible permutation in E is a bijection of E on E and Ide is the identity of the set Eco

Eco{Aos, Boa, Cof, Dn, Ea} respectively stops, affricates, fricatives, nasals, approximants

For instance, we can multiply cycles considering the rightmost cycle first:

Representing a universal set of articulation (evidence has been shown elsewhere that the universal SSP is retrieved to recognize words in segmentation [73]. Thus the basic relation could be patterns permitted, geometrically and algebraically, and schematized in the Cayley table for pentagon and cyclic notations (rotations and reflections for D5) [74].

*The Biolinguistic Instantiation: Form to Meaning in Brain/Syllable Interactions DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89943*

Possible universal clustering on onset/coda positions could be calculated within these forms either using a schematic rotation with a selection value or deriving algebraically the orbit and the cycles from a set of 1 to n elements (1–5).

Furthermore, this universal principle grounding in both SSP and categorical perception [75]—nonetheless, the last study brings another evidence of variable categorical behavior in perception for clusters. It relies on a more biological robust basis for neural processing of categories, along with the gestural combinatory basis allowing us to predict from what we term SQP (sequencing permutation model) a specific language selection on the binary computation level:


Moreover, we only focus in this article on onset/coda processes of clustering knowing that coda.onset structures of iconicity bear an important dimension in both lexical distinctiveness/statistics but also in argument and semantic structure. We also exclude singletons from our clustering perspective; the frame would be different on both onset/coda positions.

#### *3.2.2.5 Onset structure*

Beyond any statistical account of onset (English), we notice other permutation processes between T2–T3 forms already discussed in the abovementioned addition/ deletion frames. Without, any symmetrical or mirroring effect, do these forms specify any phonological/prosodic or semantic processes?

SSP principle

And OS 3 < A 2 Are elicited.

• Preserving the SSP postvolcalic coda

Only: N (1) > OS (3) <A (2)

*Cognitive and Intermedial Semiotics*

Sequencing deletion: from the rule 3 2 1

Obstruent Stop OS (3) ------ A (2) ----- nasals (1)

After defining the deletion/adding rules from gestural to computational levels and instructions, we address in the following section the sequencing permutation models.

Many inversion rules have been suggested as universal rules of onset/coda positions [72]. On the other hand, we have adopted a mathematical permutation model to address the phonotactic gestural/featural components and their class selections. If the set ECO is the set of natural articulatory classes defined by its sonority scale for the syllable, then the group of possible permutation in E is a bijection of E on E

Eco{Aos, Boa, Cof, Dn, Ea} respectively stops, affricates, fricatives, nasals,

For instance, we can multiply cycles considering the rightmost cycle first:

Representing a universal set of articulation (evidence has been shown elsewhere that the universal SSP is retrieved to recognize words in segmentation [73]. Thus the basic relation could be patterns permitted, geometrically and algebraically, and schematized in the Cayley table for pentagon and cyclic notations (rotations and

*3.2.2.4 Inversion rules framework and Sequencing Permutations (SQP)*

• T 1 (O) / T2 (O): T1 (C) and inventories:

and Ide is the identity of the set Eco

approximants

reflections for D5) [74].

**116**
