5. Conclusion

The impact of Aedes mosquitoes on human health and the prospect of losing the battle against this species requires urgent and scientifically sound strategies [6, 7]. Here, we propose an adaptation to existing recommendations to rationalize, catalyze and coordinate the capabilities of modern society. More responsible societal co-ordination and allocation of limited resources based on existing accountability and physical accessibility can more effectively eliminate these deadly foes, but as a fortuitous by-product presents an opportunity to additionally improve the quality of life by improving the livability, cleanliness and beauty of shared social spaces.

[3] Reiner RC Jr, Achee N, Barrera R, Burkot TR, Chadee DD, Devine GJ, et al. Quantifying the epidemiological impact of vector control on dengue. PLoS Neglected Tropical Dis-

Urban Ecology and the Effectiveness of *Aedes* Control http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.78688 89

[4] Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496:504-507. DOI: 10.1038/nature12060

[5] Paixão ES, Teixeira MG, Rodrigues LC. Zika, chikungunya and dengue: The causes and threats of new and re-emerging arboviral diseases. BMJ Global Health. 2018;3:e000530.

[6] Achee NL, Gould F, Perkins TA, RCR J, Morrison AC, Ritchie SA, et al. A critical assessment of vector control for dengue prevention. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2015;9:

[7] Erlanger TE, Keiser J, Utzinger J. Effect of dengue vector control interventions on entomological parameters in developing countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 2008;22:203-221. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2008.00740.x

[8] Morrison AC, Zielinski-Gutierrez E, Scott TW, Rosenberg R. Defining challenges and proposing solutions for control of the virus vector Aedes aegypti. PLoS Medicine. 2008;5:

[9] Wong J, Stoddard ST, Astete H, Morrison AC, Scott TW. Oviposition site selection by the dengue vector Aedes aegypti and its implications for dengue control. PLoS Neglected

[10] PAHO. Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever in the Americas: Guidelines for Prevention and Control. Washington, DC: Pan American health Organization; 1994. Available from: http://apps.who.int/bookorders/anglais/detart1.jsp?codlan=1&codcol=61&codcch=548

[11] WHO. Mosquito control: Can it stop Zika at source? [cited 28 Sep 2016]. Available from:

[12] Gubler DJ. Aedes aegypti and Aedes aegypti-borne disease control in the 1990s: Top down or bottom up. Charles Franklin Craig lecture. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine

[13] Nguyen TH, Nguyen HL, Nguyen TY, Vu SN, Tran ND, Le TN, et al. Field evaluation of the establishment potential of wMelPop wolbachia in Australia and Vietnam for dengue

[14] Ritchie SA, Johnson BJ. Advances in vector control science: Rear-and-release strategies show promise… but don't forget the basics. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2017;215:

[15] Lindsay SW, Wilson A, Golding N, Scott TW, Takken W. Improving the built environment in urban areas to control Aedes aegypti-borne diseases. Bulletin of the World Health

Tropical Diseases. 2011;5:e1015. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001015

http://www.who.int/emergencies/zika-virus/articles/mosquito-control/en/

control. Parasites & Vectors. 2015;8:563. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-015-1174-x

Organization. 2017;95:607-608. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.16.189688

eases. 2016;10:e0004588. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004588

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000530

e0003655. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003655

e68. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050068

and Hygiene. 1989;40:571-578

S103-S108. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiw575
