**Hysterectomy: Advances in Perioperative Care**

Kenneth Jensen and Jens Børglum

*Copenhagen University Hospital: Bispebjerg, Denmark* 

## **1. Introduction**

#### **1.1 Perioperative medicine**

Perioperative medicine is an ever growing field of interest that encompasses the care of the patient preparing for, undergoing and recuperating from surgery. Medical professionals, interest groups and societies each year convene at congresses dedicated to the field of evidence-based perioperative medicine (e.g., www.ebpom.org). Since many interventions during the hospital stay have ramifications extending into the first six months after discharge, many choose to define "perioperative" broadly to include this extended period as well. Our topics of interest are equally broadly defined and include psychological, physiological, anaesthesiological and surgical issues. We have chosen this overview to increase our understanding of the interplay of factors that in all make up the experience of the hysterectomy patients, hopefully to explain and justify the value of treatment regimens.

#### **1.2 Purpose and methods**

Much has happened within the past 10 years. In spite of an ever-growing and unwieldy amount of scientific information appearing every month, unmet needs may still be readily identified in many fields of endeavor. To highlight the current evidence, we have performed a Medline search on "hysterectomy" limited to randomized studies published in the past decade. This should expand the evidence-based website www.postoppain.org, which provides an analysis of all randomized studies on abdominal hysterectomy since 1966 (and until 2004). Our aim is to provide the anaesthesia-unqualified reader with an extensive and easily accessible presentation of the psychology, physiology, pharmacology and operative logistics that we find relevant to the subject of hysterectomy; characteristics of the patients, the importance of anaesthetic and surgical techniques, the prevention and treatment of postoperative complaints, and why established treatments may not work. While not striving to be completely exhaustive, our review nevertheless includes a thorough reference list that may inspire the reader to further in-depth study.

## **2. Psychology**

#### **2.1 Preoperative psychology and coping skills**

Understandably, undergoing surgery is often the cause of great concern for patients. We know that as many as 60% of patients are anxious (Hashimato, 1993), with females, depressed and

Hysterectomy: Advances in Perioperative Care 227

changes after oophorectomy with surgical menopause. As a case in point, quality-of-life estimates are clearly rated as worse by a surgical menopause than by a natural menopause (Bhattacharya, 2010). Surgical menopause also adversely affects perceptions of body image and sleep quality at six months compared to ovarian conservation surgery (Teplin, 2007). Women who undergo prophylactic oophorectomy in addition to hysterectomy are found to have higher anxiety-related scores, lower sexuality scores and poorer emotional partner relationships (Aziz, 2005). In terms of sexual function, extent of surgery (subtotal vs total hysterectomy) does not seem to affect overall sexual activity, but total hysterectomy does reduce the perception of body image at one year (Gorlero, 2008). Recently, however, some have found that women who had subtotal hysterectomy report significantly greater positive change in the frequency of orgasm and sexual pleasure than women who have had total hysterectomy (Ellström, 2010). Method of surgery (laparoscopic vs vaginal vs abdominal) yields conflicting results on the influence on sexual activity (Ellström, 2003; Roovers, 2003). Women having abdominal hysterectomy may be dissatisfied with their body image because of the abdominal scar (Gütl, 2002). Quality of life following hysterectomy for malignant reasons seems to be affected even stronger: sexual function worsens considerably, regardless of surgical technique (Serati, 2009). Anxiety and depression following surgery for cervical cancer is commonly associated with financial difficulty, poor body image, sexual inactivity, and low existential well-being. Low support and insomnia are related to anxiety, with older age and decrement role function related to depression (Kim, 2010). These substantial effects seem to cling to an inherent personality profile rather than disease-related clinical factors.

Trait and existential anxiety seem to be resistant to preventive informational or cognitive interventions. Procedure-specific concerns, however, lend themselves to several psychological og medical approaches (Caumo, 2002). A preoperative 24-minute videotape of a nurse showing breathing and movement skills with four postoperative mobility activities (The Foster Pain Intervention) reduces pain, increases mobility, preoperative self-efficacy and speeds up home readiness more than a control group receiving standard information (Heye, 2002). Cognitive interventions using distraction and reappraisal combined with information are associated with lower postoperative anxiety, less pain and higher levels of satisfaction (Cheung, 2003). Therapeutic touch may be equally effective (Vitale, 2006). Intraoperative music is associated with increased levels of sedation and satisfaction (Zhang, 2005). Patient-carer interactions using negative words on the surgical wards has significant influence on pain in the early postoperative period by increasing pain, opioid consumption and stress hormone levels, whereas positive words or no words at all has little influence (Wang, 2008). These studies again underline the importance of optimal information-handling, pragmatic instructions, simple psychological interventions and decent patient-carer interactions as the basic premise for the prevention of postoperative complaints following hysterectomy. It makes perfect sense to identify beforehand the psychological traits that predispose to inappropriate coping abilities, exaggerated pain processing and distorted body image perceptions, since they seem to

**2.4 Prevention and treatment of anxiety and its effects** 

share similar psychological profiles (Persson, 2008).

patients in pain being particularly prone (Caumo, 2002; Karanci, 2003). This anxiety is caused by uncertainty/lack of information about what is going to happen and an existential component (Caumo, 2002; Sjölin, 2003). While uncertainties about oncoming events may be reduced by relevant information and proper expectations, existential anxieties are often resistant to intervention (Kain, 2001). Studies have shown that most patients are scared of thoughts of the unknown, severe pain, nausea and vomiting, or imminent death (Kindler, 2000). Previous experiences and personality usually dictate the style and ability of coping and dealing with serious life events such as surgery. Studies using the Spielberger State and Trait Anxiety Index (Johnson, 1968) or the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (Moerman, 1996) have documented that particular personality structures and coping skills of the patient are in part responsible for the intensity and duration of postoperative pain, with subsequent self-imposed limitations to mobilization and restoration of normal activities (Riddle, 2010). Such psychological traits may in fact be so strong that they overshadow effective pain treatment (Maranets, 1999; Caumo, 2002; Kalkman, 2003). Neurologically, the interaction between the amygdala (fear-avoidance centre), the frontal cortex (centre of experience and value-setting), and the nucleus accumbens (reward centre) are pivotal, all of which are influenced by personality, obesity, alcoholism, depressive disorders and more (Di Chiara, 2002). The personality structure that is most reliably used is the five factor model (Big Five Inventory) which uses five independent personality measures (openness to change, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) (Digman, 1990). The variability of these measures is dynamic, and at least three measures rapidly change following surgery: patients become less open to changes, more introvert, and more negative in thought. These changes lead to distorted and inefficient coping skills, depressive or defeatist mood swings, and catastrophizing (imagining unlikely and potentially catastrophic events from simple and harmless signs and symptoms). These emotions are strong and overwhelming and must be addressed in order to secure a return to postoperative well-being.

#### **2.2 The impact on postoperative well-being**

Preoperative pain or depression may be seen in as many as 50% (Davies, 2002). In a study on chronic pain following hysterectomy, most patients having pain at four months after surgery had pain that resembled the preoperative pain; preoperative "pain problems elsewhere" and strong acute postoperative pain were associated with the development of chronic pain, again emphasizing the psychological dimension (Brandsborg, 2009). Women with preoperative depression and pain had 3 to 5 times the odds of continued impaired quality of life for both physical function, mental health, social function and dyspareunia, compared to those who did not have depression or pain (Hartmann, 2004). The extent (subtotal vs total hysterectomy) or method (laparoscopic vs abdominal) of surgery does not seem to influence these long-term effects (Thakar, 2004; Flory, 2006). Most studies support a general increase in psychosocial well-being at 6 months following surgery (Davies, 2002; Persson, 2010), and it is worth noting that this long-term well-being does not seem to be associated with perioperative complications or hormone disturbances (Persson, 2010).

#### **2.3 Long-term psychological effects following hysterectomy**

Women undergoing hysterectomy are in a particularly difficult position, since surgery may alter both their perception of body image and sexuality, and impose hormonal

patients in pain being particularly prone (Caumo, 2002; Karanci, 2003). This anxiety is caused by uncertainty/lack of information about what is going to happen and an existential component (Caumo, 2002; Sjölin, 2003). While uncertainties about oncoming events may be reduced by relevant information and proper expectations, existential anxieties are often resistant to intervention (Kain, 2001). Studies have shown that most patients are scared of thoughts of the unknown, severe pain, nausea and vomiting, or imminent death (Kindler, 2000). Previous experiences and personality usually dictate the style and ability of coping and dealing with serious life events such as surgery. Studies using the Spielberger State and Trait Anxiety Index (Johnson, 1968) or the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (Moerman, 1996) have documented that particular personality structures and coping skills of the patient are in part responsible for the intensity and duration of postoperative pain, with subsequent self-imposed limitations to mobilization and restoration of normal activities (Riddle, 2010). Such psychological traits may in fact be so strong that they overshadow effective pain treatment (Maranets, 1999; Caumo, 2002; Kalkman, 2003). Neurologically, the interaction between the amygdala (fear-avoidance centre), the frontal cortex (centre of experience and value-setting), and the nucleus accumbens (reward centre) are pivotal, all of which are influenced by personality, obesity, alcoholism, depressive disorders and more (Di Chiara, 2002). The personality structure that is most reliably used is the five factor model (Big Five Inventory) which uses five independent personality measures (openness to change, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) (Digman, 1990). The variability of these measures is dynamic, and at least three measures rapidly change following surgery: patients become less open to changes, more introvert, and more negative in thought. These changes lead to distorted and inefficient coping skills, depressive or defeatist mood swings, and catastrophizing (imagining unlikely and potentially catastrophic events from simple and harmless signs and symptoms). These emotions are strong and overwhelming and

must be addressed in order to secure a return to postoperative well-being.

**2.3 Long-term psychological effects following hysterectomy** 

Preoperative pain or depression may be seen in as many as 50% (Davies, 2002). In a study on chronic pain following hysterectomy, most patients having pain at four months after surgery had pain that resembled the preoperative pain; preoperative "pain problems elsewhere" and strong acute postoperative pain were associated with the development of chronic pain, again emphasizing the psychological dimension (Brandsborg, 2009). Women with preoperative depression and pain had 3 to 5 times the odds of continued impaired quality of life for both physical function, mental health, social function and dyspareunia, compared to those who did not have depression or pain (Hartmann, 2004). The extent (subtotal vs total hysterectomy) or method (laparoscopic vs abdominal) of surgery does not seem to influence these long-term effects (Thakar, 2004; Flory, 2006). Most studies support a general increase in psychosocial well-being at 6 months following surgery (Davies, 2002; Persson, 2010), and it is worth noting that this long-term well-being does not seem to be associated with perioperative complications or hormone disturbances (Persson, 2010).

Women undergoing hysterectomy are in a particularly difficult position, since surgery may alter both their perception of body image and sexuality, and impose hormonal

**2.2 The impact on postoperative well-being** 

changes after oophorectomy with surgical menopause. As a case in point, quality-of-life estimates are clearly rated as worse by a surgical menopause than by a natural menopause (Bhattacharya, 2010). Surgical menopause also adversely affects perceptions of body image and sleep quality at six months compared to ovarian conservation surgery (Teplin, 2007). Women who undergo prophylactic oophorectomy in addition to hysterectomy are found to have higher anxiety-related scores, lower sexuality scores and poorer emotional partner relationships (Aziz, 2005). In terms of sexual function, extent of surgery (subtotal vs total hysterectomy) does not seem to affect overall sexual activity, but total hysterectomy does reduce the perception of body image at one year (Gorlero, 2008). Recently, however, some have found that women who had subtotal hysterectomy report significantly greater positive change in the frequency of orgasm and sexual pleasure than women who have had total hysterectomy (Ellström, 2010). Method of surgery (laparoscopic vs vaginal vs abdominal) yields conflicting results on the influence on sexual activity (Ellström, 2003; Roovers, 2003). Women having abdominal hysterectomy may be dissatisfied with their body image because of the abdominal scar (Gütl, 2002). Quality of life following hysterectomy for malignant reasons seems to be affected even stronger: sexual function worsens considerably, regardless of surgical technique (Serati, 2009). Anxiety and depression following surgery for cervical cancer is commonly associated with financial difficulty, poor body image, sexual inactivity, and low existential well-being. Low support and insomnia are related to anxiety, with older age and decrement role function related to depression (Kim, 2010). These substantial effects seem to cling to an inherent personality profile rather than disease-related clinical factors.

#### **2.4 Prevention and treatment of anxiety and its effects**

Trait and existential anxiety seem to be resistant to preventive informational or cognitive interventions. Procedure-specific concerns, however, lend themselves to several psychological og medical approaches (Caumo, 2002). A preoperative 24-minute videotape of a nurse showing breathing and movement skills with four postoperative mobility activities (The Foster Pain Intervention) reduces pain, increases mobility, preoperative self-efficacy and speeds up home readiness more than a control group receiving standard information (Heye, 2002). Cognitive interventions using distraction and reappraisal combined with information are associated with lower postoperative anxiety, less pain and higher levels of satisfaction (Cheung, 2003). Therapeutic touch may be equally effective (Vitale, 2006). Intraoperative music is associated with increased levels of sedation and satisfaction (Zhang, 2005). Patient-carer interactions using negative words on the surgical wards has significant influence on pain in the early postoperative period by increasing pain, opioid consumption and stress hormone levels, whereas positive words or no words at all has little influence (Wang, 2008). These studies again underline the importance of optimal information-handling, pragmatic instructions, simple psychological interventions and decent patient-carer interactions as the basic premise for the prevention of postoperative complaints following hysterectomy. It makes perfect sense to identify beforehand the psychological traits that predispose to inappropriate coping abilities, exaggerated pain processing and distorted body image perceptions, since they seem to share similar psychological profiles (Persson, 2008).

Hysterectomy: Advances in Perioperative Care 229

shown to improve tolerance to solid foods, time to first bowel movement and passage of stool, although the magnitude of improvements were moderate (Herzog, 2006; Tan, 2007); 3) the use of simple osmotic laxatives have been shown to reduce time to first defecation from 69 to 45 hours with subsequent early hospital discharge (Hansen, 2007); 4) early postoperative oral intake seems to be superior to delayed intake by reducing time to first solid diet, presence of bowel sounds, and shorter hospital stay, at the expense of slightly increased nausea (Charoenkwan, 2007); 5) the combination of intravenous morphine with butorphanol reduces opioid requirements and some opioid-related side effects, but causes sedation, sweating and dry mouth (Wang, 2009); 6) the combination with nalbuphine, a mixed opioid agonist-antagonist, also seems to attenuate opioid-related nausea, but other opioid-related side effects remain unchanged (Yeh, 2009); 7) the omission of a background rate of infusion of morphine for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) seems to reduce overall morphine consumption, reduce nausea, vomiting and dizziness but, again, other opioid-related side effects remain unchanged (Chen, 2011); 8) intravenous oxycodone seems to cause less opioid-related sedation than intravenous morphine, but other side effects are similar, suggesting a difference caused by stochastic variation (Lenz, 2009).

Variations between opioids aside, even more pronounced differences may be found between individuals in terms of pharmacokinetics and, in particular, pharmacodynamics. In the past decade, research has given us a great amount of knowledge on the genetic disposition that explains these differences, and to what extent people react differently to pain. The opioid receptor and its determining gene (OPRM1) has been shown to have 17 variations (socalled polymorhism) that are unequally distributed between the sexes (Samer, 2010; Kolesnikov, 2011). Women are found to have μ receptor variations that predispose to longer clinical effects of an opioid, and twice as many side effects as men (Sarton, 2003; Niesters, 2010). In a study on A118G polymorphisms, patients homozygous for G118 required more morphine doses to achieve adequate pain relief compared with patients homozygous for A118 (Chou, 2006). Furthermore, the experience of pain may be unevenly distributed. Women experience more pain than men, and even among women major differences in the tolerance to each pain modality exist. Studies that address these variations suggest that at least six modalities may be identified (Lariviere, 2002; Hastie, 2005). The clinical relevance is enormous because several modalities of pain are at work following hysterectomy: nociceptive, ischaemic, pressure, temporal, neurogenic, chemical/irritative. The individual contribution of each pain modality may be difficult to assess in a particular patient, but each patient will react to certain pain sensations according to her particular sensitivity. Investigations into other postoperative complaints are also emerging and seem to share similar gender differences. These gender differences may include the actions of commonly used drugs for intraoperative sedation and pain relief, causing prolonged sedative effects and ill health in

Acute physiological changes during surgery are determined by the disposition and preoperative state of the patient, the type and depth of anaesthesia, and the surgical

**3.3 Gender-specific pharmacogenetics** 

the post-anaesthesia care unit (Jensen, 2009).

**4.1 Physiological changes during surgery** 

**4. Physiology** 

#### **3. Pharmacology**

#### **3.1 Opioid-free analgesia**

Opioid-free analgesia has long been considered the holy grail of pain treatment. Opioids reduce nociceptive signal processing in the spinal cord and central nervous system by acting on, among others, the μ receptor. The analgesic potential for blockade of this receptor is limitless, and the mode of administration of an opioid is largely independent of its efficacy. No other type of drug has a similar potential, and for this reason, opioids are of immense value. Opioids are widely distributed and are subsequently found in most compartments of the body by any route of administration. In terms of analgesic effect, no strong opioid is superior to any other; their only differences rest in mode of administration, dosage and duration of action (Macintyre, 2010). Surgical stress and analgesic efficacy during and after abdominal hysterectomy proceeds regardless of the opioid used (Rodriguez, 2007); one report argues that morphine in combination with the weak opioid tramadol may confer better postoperative pain scores than morphine alone (Kocabas, 2005), but the result should be replicated before firm conclusions can be made. Spinal morphine seems to attenuate several measures of the surgical stress response, in particular serum values of catecholamines and glucose (Karaman, 2006). However, preoperative intravenous morphine fails to attenuate the stress response measured by serum cortisol, glucose and leukocytes (Kilickan, 2001); the socalled "preemptive effect" has been largely abandoned in clinical life because many studies fail to document better pain relief when opioids are administered preoperatively than postoperatively, even though studies appear from time to time arguing the case of preemptive analgesia from the viewpoint of minor effects on immune function, parameters which may be clinically redundant (Akural, 2002; Akural, 2004).

#### **3.2 Opioid side effects and preventive strategies**

In terms of side effects, however, opioids do have differences, primarily due to pharmacokinetics (administration, distribution, metabolism, excretion), where the most basic opioid, morphine, may accumulate metabolites that are neurotoxic under certain conditions such as renal insufficiency, advanced age or immense doses (Murphy, 2005). The quest for opioidfree analgesia, however, stems from the autonomic side effects of the drugs: impaired cognitive function, dizziness, sedation bordering on coma; respiratory depression and apnoe; nausea, vomiting and increased gastrointestinal sphincter contraction causing obstipation; urinary bladder paralysis, pruritus and excessive sweating. Many of these side effects occur at random and with different intensities, but they all counteract the primary content of recuperation: eating, drinking, passing urine, defecating and ambulating. All opioids act similarly in this respect, and although side effects usually occur at higher doses than analgesic effects, they still remain a major clinical problem which render many patients helpless, unable to get out of bed, with the subsequent risk of more severe complications such as hypoxia, pneumonia, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, ileus and decubitus. The apparent discord between the obvious need for opioids and the abhorred side effects have led clinicians to try various methods of alleviating opioid-related side effects: 1) the combination of intravenous morphine with a μ-receptor antagonist such as naloxone by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been largely disappointing (Sartain, 2003; Zhao, 2005); 2) a similar combination using a μ-receptor antagonist, alvimopan, with limited oral bioavailibility (thus only acting in the GI tract) has fared better and has been

Opioid-free analgesia has long been considered the holy grail of pain treatment. Opioids reduce nociceptive signal processing in the spinal cord and central nervous system by acting on, among others, the μ receptor. The analgesic potential for blockade of this receptor is limitless, and the mode of administration of an opioid is largely independent of its efficacy. No other type of drug has a similar potential, and for this reason, opioids are of immense value. Opioids are widely distributed and are subsequently found in most compartments of the body by any route of administration. In terms of analgesic effect, no strong opioid is superior to any other; their only differences rest in mode of administration, dosage and duration of action (Macintyre, 2010). Surgical stress and analgesic efficacy during and after abdominal hysterectomy proceeds regardless of the opioid used (Rodriguez, 2007); one report argues that morphine in combination with the weak opioid tramadol may confer better postoperative pain scores than morphine alone (Kocabas, 2005), but the result should be replicated before firm conclusions can be made. Spinal morphine seems to attenuate several measures of the surgical stress response, in particular serum values of catecholamines and glucose (Karaman, 2006). However, preoperative intravenous morphine fails to attenuate the stress response measured by serum cortisol, glucose and leukocytes (Kilickan, 2001); the socalled "preemptive effect" has been largely abandoned in clinical life because many studies fail to document better pain relief when opioids are administered preoperatively than postoperatively, even though studies appear from time to time arguing the case of preemptive analgesia from the viewpoint of minor effects on immune function,

parameters which may be clinically redundant (Akural, 2002; Akural, 2004).

In terms of side effects, however, opioids do have differences, primarily due to pharmacokinetics (administration, distribution, metabolism, excretion), where the most basic opioid, morphine, may accumulate metabolites that are neurotoxic under certain conditions such as renal insufficiency, advanced age or immense doses (Murphy, 2005). The quest for opioidfree analgesia, however, stems from the autonomic side effects of the drugs: impaired cognitive function, dizziness, sedation bordering on coma; respiratory depression and apnoe; nausea, vomiting and increased gastrointestinal sphincter contraction causing obstipation; urinary bladder paralysis, pruritus and excessive sweating. Many of these side effects occur at random and with different intensities, but they all counteract the primary content of recuperation: eating, drinking, passing urine, defecating and ambulating. All opioids act similarly in this respect, and although side effects usually occur at higher doses than analgesic effects, they still remain a major clinical problem which render many patients helpless, unable to get out of bed, with the subsequent risk of more severe complications such as hypoxia, pneumonia, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, ileus and decubitus. The apparent discord between the obvious need for opioids and the abhorred side effects have led clinicians to try various methods of alleviating opioid-related side effects: 1) the combination of intravenous morphine with a μ-receptor antagonist such as naloxone by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been largely disappointing (Sartain, 2003; Zhao, 2005); 2) a similar combination using a μ-receptor antagonist, alvimopan, with limited oral bioavailibility (thus only acting in the GI tract) has fared better and has been

**3.2 Opioid side effects and preventive strategies** 

**3. Pharmacology** 

**3.1 Opioid-free analgesia** 

shown to improve tolerance to solid foods, time to first bowel movement and passage of stool, although the magnitude of improvements were moderate (Herzog, 2006; Tan, 2007); 3) the use of simple osmotic laxatives have been shown to reduce time to first defecation from 69 to 45 hours with subsequent early hospital discharge (Hansen, 2007); 4) early postoperative oral intake seems to be superior to delayed intake by reducing time to first solid diet, presence of bowel sounds, and shorter hospital stay, at the expense of slightly increased nausea (Charoenkwan, 2007); 5) the combination of intravenous morphine with butorphanol reduces opioid requirements and some opioid-related side effects, but causes sedation, sweating and dry mouth (Wang, 2009); 6) the combination with nalbuphine, a mixed opioid agonist-antagonist, also seems to attenuate opioid-related nausea, but other opioid-related side effects remain unchanged (Yeh, 2009); 7) the omission of a background rate of infusion of morphine for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) seems to reduce overall morphine consumption, reduce nausea, vomiting and dizziness but, again, other opioid-related side effects remain unchanged (Chen, 2011); 8) intravenous oxycodone seems to cause less opioid-related sedation than intravenous morphine, but other side effects are similar, suggesting a difference caused by stochastic variation (Lenz, 2009).

#### **3.3 Gender-specific pharmacogenetics**

Variations between opioids aside, even more pronounced differences may be found between individuals in terms of pharmacokinetics and, in particular, pharmacodynamics. In the past decade, research has given us a great amount of knowledge on the genetic disposition that explains these differences, and to what extent people react differently to pain. The opioid receptor and its determining gene (OPRM1) has been shown to have 17 variations (socalled polymorhism) that are unequally distributed between the sexes (Samer, 2010; Kolesnikov, 2011). Women are found to have μ receptor variations that predispose to longer clinical effects of an opioid, and twice as many side effects as men (Sarton, 2003; Niesters, 2010). In a study on A118G polymorphisms, patients homozygous for G118 required more morphine doses to achieve adequate pain relief compared with patients homozygous for A118 (Chou, 2006). Furthermore, the experience of pain may be unevenly distributed. Women experience more pain than men, and even among women major differences in the tolerance to each pain modality exist. Studies that address these variations suggest that at least six modalities may be identified (Lariviere, 2002; Hastie, 2005). The clinical relevance is enormous because several modalities of pain are at work following hysterectomy: nociceptive, ischaemic, pressure, temporal, neurogenic, chemical/irritative. The individual contribution of each pain modality may be difficult to assess in a particular patient, but each patient will react to certain pain sensations according to her particular sensitivity. Investigations into other postoperative complaints are also emerging and seem to share similar gender differences. These gender differences may include the actions of commonly used drugs for intraoperative sedation and pain relief, causing prolonged sedative effects and ill health in the post-anaesthesia care unit (Jensen, 2009).

#### **4. Physiology**

#### **4.1 Physiological changes during surgery**

Acute physiological changes during surgery are determined by the disposition and preoperative state of the patient, the type and depth of anaesthesia, and the surgical

Hysterectomy: Advances in Perioperative Care 231

movement are useless for identifying patients that may be partially awake and at risk of awareness. A particular side effect of inhalational anaesthesia is the increased risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), suggesting that intravenous drugs may be preferable. Propofol may in itself be antiemetic. The decision between inhalational anaesthesia and TIVA does, however, remain difficult. Studies comparing the two anaesthetic methods are equivocal, with a tendency towards superiority in the TIVA groups in terms of less nausea and earlier start of oral fluid intake (Fassoulaki, 2008; Kroon, 2010). A recent study suggests that deep levels of intraoperative sedation (as measured by auditory evoked potentials) may reduce postoperative morphine demands (Henneberg, 2005). It was conducted using TIVA, but it remains unknown if a similar relationship may be seen with inhalational agents. This would justify a more widespread use of monitoring devices for

The use of an adjuvant epidural has had strong support for many years. It reduces surgical stress response, reduces sedative requirements (Morley, 2002), shortens length of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit (Jensen, 2009) and may serve as route of administration for other adjuvant drugs beside local anaesthetics and opioids. Duration or quality of analgesia has been shown to be increased by the addition of butorphanol (Bharti, 2009), magnesium (Farouk, 2008) or clonidine (Topcu, 2005). The combination of epidural local anaesthetics with opioids does however remain a basic requirement (Niiyama, 2005), and epidural opioids carry with them an increased risk of gastric paresis, obstipation, nausea and bladder paresis. Furthermore, while the use of an epidural may reduce pain and opioid demands, it seems to have only limited effects on gastrointestinal function and patient recovery (Jørgensen, 2001). In conclusion, the epidural technique has several shortcomings as an adjuvant technique and does not convincingly seem to solve the basic clinical problems in

The type of surgery probably has the greatest impact on the physiological changes during surgery. Many of these are expected from a mechanistic point of view in relation to Trendelenburg positioning, increased abdominal pressure, variations in cardiac preload and afterload, positive pressure ventilation, fluid therapy and depth of anaesthesia, but some are also infrequent. They include hypothermia, deep vein thrombosis, cardiac arhythmias, circulatory collapse from sympathetic trunk block and metabolic changes during surgical stress response. The choice between surgical techniques is often made by the surgeon in conference with the patient, but the reasons are often unclear. From the view of an anaesthesiologist, only in the past few years do we have strong scientific support for the effect of surgical technique on postoperative complaints. It seems evident that a minimally invasive technique using laparoscopy and/or vaginal approach is superior to laparotomy, in terms of less postoperative pain, less morphine demand, shorter duration of bladder catheterisation, better immune function, length of stay in hospital, and measures of postoperative vitality (Ribeiro, 2003; Garry, 2004; Ghezzi, 2010; Naik, 2010). Minilaparotomy has similar advantages to ordinary laparotomy (Sharma, 2004). Laparoscopic technique seems superior to vaginal approach in terms of reduced postoperative pain and length of

depth of sedation.

**4.3 Epidural blockade as an adjuvant technique** 

the immediate postoperative period.

**4.4 Surgical technique** 

technique. Important preoperative patient factors include heart and lung function, body mass index, metabolic disorders, concurrent medications or alcohol, and level of hydration; such factors determine the mechanistic vascular responses to surgery and the sensitivity to drugs, fluids and body positioning. Serious complications include hypotension, bradycardia, atelectasis, hypoxia and awareness, all of which may be adequately prevented and treated. Particular interest should be paid to surgical techniques involving laparoscopy. Pneumoperitoneum increases intraabdominal pressure and, either alone or with Trendelenburg positioning, may increase/decrease cardiac preload, increase cardiac afterload, reduce pulmonary volumes, decrease functional residual capacity and increase closing volume. This may lead to circulatory instability, atelectases and hypoxia (Strang, 2009; Hedenstierna, 2010). Oxygenation may be considerably improved by alveolar recruitment maneuvres and positive end-expiratory pressure, and these measures are considered mandatory for pulmonary protection (Park, 2009). The immune system seems resistant to most types of anaesthesia. Metabolic changes such as cortisol rise is more pronounced in vaginal than laparoscopic surgery, although stress response with catecholamine levels are high in both types of surgery (Lattermann, 2001). Laparotomy is associated with increased levels of C-reactive protein, creatine phosphokinase and lactic dehydrogenase compared to laparoscopic-assisted vaginal technique, corresponding to the greater amount of tissue damage inflicted; these immunological differences are in turn reflected in clinically useful measures such as length of stay (Atabekoglu, 2004). Although the clinical value remains controversial, preoperative epidural blockade may in fact attenuate interleukin levels associated with the inflammatory response after abdominal hysterectomy (Beilin, 2003).

#### **4.2 Anaesthetic technique**

The type of anaesthesia is highly variable between surgical centres and is in a limited way dictated by type of surgery. General anaesthesia is the preferred method, with supplemental epidural analgesia, perineural or infiltrative analgesia when major postoperative pain is anticipated. Spinal anaesthesia may be an alternative for abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy allowing for less postoperative morphine demands, but the use of intrathecal morphine also includes more postoperative itching (Sprung, 2006; Massicotte, 2009; Wodlin, 2011). Fasttrack programmes using spinal anaesthesia with intrathecal morphine may even be associated with improved quality of life measures several weeks after surgery compared to general anaesthesia, because even minor complications adversely affect the mental component of quality of life and duration of sick leave (Ottesen, 2002; Penketh, 2007; Wodlin, 2011). General anaesthesia counteracts the cardiovascular effects of the physiological stress response by dilating peripheral vasculature, reducing cardiac output, blood pressure and heart rate in a dose-dependent fashion. Metabolic responses to surgery are, however, largely unaffected by sedative agents alone, and in order to suppress these responses as well, opioids or neuraxial anaesthesia should be used (Demirbilek, 2004; Hong, 2008; Ihn, 2009). Sedation is almost always combined with an efficient intraoperative opioid, and all opioids may in principle be adequate; controllability of dosage and effect is the primary concern for the clinician. Level of sleep may be estimated by bispectral index monitoring, although some controversy exists regarding the applicability and usefulness of its largely unknown algorithm for interpreting depth of anaesthesia (Meyhoff, 2009). Autonomic signs such as hypertension, tachycardia, pupil dilation, sweating and reflex

technique. Important preoperative patient factors include heart and lung function, body mass index, metabolic disorders, concurrent medications or alcohol, and level of hydration; such factors determine the mechanistic vascular responses to surgery and the sensitivity to drugs, fluids and body positioning. Serious complications include hypotension, bradycardia, atelectasis, hypoxia and awareness, all of which may be adequately prevented and treated. Particular interest should be paid to surgical techniques involving laparoscopy. Pneumoperitoneum increases intraabdominal pressure and, either alone or with Trendelenburg positioning, may increase/decrease cardiac preload, increase cardiac afterload, reduce pulmonary volumes, decrease functional residual capacity and increase closing volume. This may lead to circulatory instability, atelectases and hypoxia (Strang, 2009; Hedenstierna, 2010). Oxygenation may be considerably improved by alveolar recruitment maneuvres and positive end-expiratory pressure, and these measures are considered mandatory for pulmonary protection (Park, 2009). The immune system seems resistant to most types of anaesthesia. Metabolic changes such as cortisol rise is more pronounced in vaginal than laparoscopic surgery, although stress response with catecholamine levels are high in both types of surgery (Lattermann, 2001). Laparotomy is associated with increased levels of C-reactive protein, creatine phosphokinase and lactic dehydrogenase compared to laparoscopic-assisted vaginal technique, corresponding to the greater amount of tissue damage inflicted; these immunological differences are in turn reflected in clinically useful measures such as length of stay (Atabekoglu, 2004). Although the clinical value remains controversial, preoperative epidural blockade may in fact attenuate interleukin levels associated with the inflammatory response after abdominal

The type of anaesthesia is highly variable between surgical centres and is in a limited way dictated by type of surgery. General anaesthesia is the preferred method, with supplemental epidural analgesia, perineural or infiltrative analgesia when major postoperative pain is anticipated. Spinal anaesthesia may be an alternative for abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy allowing for less postoperative morphine demands, but the use of intrathecal morphine also includes more postoperative itching (Sprung, 2006; Massicotte, 2009; Wodlin, 2011). Fasttrack programmes using spinal anaesthesia with intrathecal morphine may even be associated with improved quality of life measures several weeks after surgery compared to general anaesthesia, because even minor complications adversely affect the mental component of quality of life and duration of sick leave (Ottesen, 2002; Penketh, 2007; Wodlin, 2011). General anaesthesia counteracts the cardiovascular effects of the physiological stress response by dilating peripheral vasculature, reducing cardiac output, blood pressure and heart rate in a dose-dependent fashion. Metabolic responses to surgery are, however, largely unaffected by sedative agents alone, and in order to suppress these responses as well, opioids or neuraxial anaesthesia should be used (Demirbilek, 2004; Hong, 2008; Ihn, 2009). Sedation is almost always combined with an efficient intraoperative opioid, and all opioids may in principle be adequate; controllability of dosage and effect is the primary concern for the clinician. Level of sleep may be estimated by bispectral index monitoring, although some controversy exists regarding the applicability and usefulness of its largely unknown algorithm for interpreting depth of anaesthesia (Meyhoff, 2009). Autonomic signs such as hypertension, tachycardia, pupil dilation, sweating and reflex

hysterectomy (Beilin, 2003).

**4.2 Anaesthetic technique** 

movement are useless for identifying patients that may be partially awake and at risk of awareness. A particular side effect of inhalational anaesthesia is the increased risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), suggesting that intravenous drugs may be preferable. Propofol may in itself be antiemetic. The decision between inhalational anaesthesia and TIVA does, however, remain difficult. Studies comparing the two anaesthetic methods are equivocal, with a tendency towards superiority in the TIVA groups in terms of less nausea and earlier start of oral fluid intake (Fassoulaki, 2008; Kroon, 2010). A recent study suggests that deep levels of intraoperative sedation (as measured by auditory evoked potentials) may reduce postoperative morphine demands (Henneberg, 2005). It was conducted using TIVA, but it remains unknown if a similar relationship may be seen with inhalational agents. This would justify a more widespread use of monitoring devices for depth of sedation.

#### **4.3 Epidural blockade as an adjuvant technique**

The use of an adjuvant epidural has had strong support for many years. It reduces surgical stress response, reduces sedative requirements (Morley, 2002), shortens length of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit (Jensen, 2009) and may serve as route of administration for other adjuvant drugs beside local anaesthetics and opioids. Duration or quality of analgesia has been shown to be increased by the addition of butorphanol (Bharti, 2009), magnesium (Farouk, 2008) or clonidine (Topcu, 2005). The combination of epidural local anaesthetics with opioids does however remain a basic requirement (Niiyama, 2005), and epidural opioids carry with them an increased risk of gastric paresis, obstipation, nausea and bladder paresis. Furthermore, while the use of an epidural may reduce pain and opioid demands, it seems to have only limited effects on gastrointestinal function and patient recovery (Jørgensen, 2001). In conclusion, the epidural technique has several shortcomings as an adjuvant technique and does not convincingly seem to solve the basic clinical problems in the immediate postoperative period.

#### **4.4 Surgical technique**

The type of surgery probably has the greatest impact on the physiological changes during surgery. Many of these are expected from a mechanistic point of view in relation to Trendelenburg positioning, increased abdominal pressure, variations in cardiac preload and afterload, positive pressure ventilation, fluid therapy and depth of anaesthesia, but some are also infrequent. They include hypothermia, deep vein thrombosis, cardiac arhythmias, circulatory collapse from sympathetic trunk block and metabolic changes during surgical stress response. The choice between surgical techniques is often made by the surgeon in conference with the patient, but the reasons are often unclear. From the view of an anaesthesiologist, only in the past few years do we have strong scientific support for the effect of surgical technique on postoperative complaints. It seems evident that a minimally invasive technique using laparoscopy and/or vaginal approach is superior to laparotomy, in terms of less postoperative pain, less morphine demand, shorter duration of bladder catheterisation, better immune function, length of stay in hospital, and measures of postoperative vitality (Ribeiro, 2003; Garry, 2004; Ghezzi, 2010; Naik, 2010). Minilaparotomy has similar advantages to ordinary laparotomy (Sharma, 2004). Laparoscopic technique seems superior to vaginal approach in terms of reduced postoperative pain and length of

situation.

**5.3 Weak analgesics** 

(Eisenach, 2010).

**5.4 New drugs** 

Hysterectomy: Advances in Perioperative Care 233

the importance of tissue trauma as the cornerstone of surgical stress response and subsequent activation of prostaglandins, cytokines, and nociceptive impulses for central nervous system modulation. These reactions are best known in the skin, in which a variety of vasoactive and irritative substances are released by tissue damage, causing a primary area of hypersensitivity, and a secondary activation of metabolites and nerve impulses in the spinal cord and central nervous system, in turn causing an additional hypersensitivity around the initial skin damage (Dirks, 2002). Brain centres value-set these painful impulses, affecting cognition, emotions, motor cortex and the autonomous nervous system. In the abdomen, the most pronounced effect during hysterectomy is activation of the vagus part of the autonomous nervous system, arising from stimulation of the neural tissue surrounding the uterus, leading to bradycardia, hypotension and nausea. Since the extent of cutaneous tissue damage during surgery determines the frame of postoperative pain complaints, the potential methods of prevention and treatment should mirror the desired clinical effect and the acceptability of side effects. In this respect, clinicians may judge inconsistently because priorities may vary according to specific demands afforded by the patient or the specific

Tramadol is a weak opioid that has failed to convincingly show benefits (Wang, 2009). Intravenous paracetamol, a weak cyclooxygenase-inhibitor in the CNS, has gained interest in a recent study that implies an additional opioid-sparing effect when given preoperatively in abdominal hysterectomy (Arici, 2009). Rectal paracetamol, on the other hand, has almost no effect (Kvalsvik, 2003). As for NSAIDs and cox-2 inhibitors (which only differ in their side effect profiles and duration of action), many studies continue to be done by the pharmaceutical companies. New intravenous formulations given during surgery clearly confirm the almost ubiquitous opioid-sparing quality of these drugs, but they add nothing new to our spectrum of useful drugs, other than handy iv formulations. A much more interesting study using intrathecal ketorolac as adjuvant in patients with chronic or postoperative pain following vaginal hysterectomy showed that, while contributions of prostaglandins from the spinal cord must be evident in the development of pain, it is clearly only of value to block prostaglandin production (by ketorolac) if levels of prostaglandin E2 are high in the cerebrospinal fluid, an event which only occurs in a subset of patients. In addition, intrathecal ketorolac does not alter time to first morphine demand after surgery

Dexamethasone has been the focus of several studies, and when used alone in laparoscopic hysterectomy, it has clinically relevant opioid-sparing properties, as well as reducing the risk of dizziness (Jokela, 2009; Thangaswamy, 2010). When used in combination with pregabalin for abdominal hysterectomy, however, one study did not replicate these properties (Mathiesen, 2009), suggesting a potentially weak analgesic effect. It should also be noted that dexamethasone at 8 mg dose given before surgery causes significant hyperglycaemia within the first six postoperative hours (Eberhart, 2011). The value of gabapentin and pregabalin are confirmed in studies published after the Prospect review and may in fact also lead to faster recovery of bowel function (Turan, 2006; Durmus, 2007). The

stay in hospital (Candiani, 2009). Recent advances such as single-port-access laparoscopy techniques may reduce pain scores even further (Kim, 2010). The extent of surgery (subtotal vs total hysterectomy) does not seem to affect short-term or long-term recovery (Lethaby, 2006; Persson, 2010).

## **5. Pain and discomfort**

## **5.1 Management of postoperative pain**

A complete list of randomized trials investigating the analgesic value of pharmacological and psychological interventions in abdominal hysterectomy is available at the website by the Prospect Research Group (www.postoppain.org). The site covers the entire period 1966- 2004, with additions into 2006 for some drugs, and a complete reference list is available. An extracted summary of the available procedure-specific evidence has been derived in Table 1, but caution should be observed in taking information at face value. With the advent of new, minimally invasive surgical techniques, thoughts about laparotomy procedures may be posthoc. It may only represent our abilities to attenuate problems caused by the most traumatic surgical technique possible, and it may not be up-to-date in regard to the spectrum of currently available analgesic techniques. This chapter therefore warrants some notes on developments in pain management that have taken place within the last few years.


Table 1. Summary effects of selected interventions on postoperative pain after abdominal hysterectomy according to the timing of administration. *Notes:* 0, no analgesic effect; 1, some analgesic effect; 2, considerable analgesic effect; ?, data not available; -, data irrelevant.

#### **5.2 Extent of tissue trauma**

The anatomical basis of pain following hysterectomy is complex. In chapter 2, we have outlined some psychological and neurophysiological aspects of importance, and highlighted

stay in hospital (Candiani, 2009). Recent advances such as single-port-access laparoscopy techniques may reduce pain scores even further (Kim, 2010). The extent of surgery (subtotal vs total hysterectomy) does not seem to affect short-term or long-term recovery (Lethaby,

A complete list of randomized trials investigating the analgesic value of pharmacological and psychological interventions in abdominal hysterectomy is available at the website by the Prospect Research Group (www.postoppain.org). The site covers the entire period 1966- 2004, with additions into 2006 for some drugs, and a complete reference list is available. An extracted summary of the available procedure-specific evidence has been derived in Table 1, but caution should be observed in taking information at face value. With the advent of new, minimally invasive surgical techniques, thoughts about laparotomy procedures may be posthoc. It may only represent our abilities to attenuate problems caused by the most traumatic surgical technique possible, and it may not be up-to-date in regard to the spectrum of currently available analgesic techniques. This chapter therefore warrants some notes on developments in pain management that have taken place within the last few years.

**Intervention Preoperative Intraoperative Postoperative** 

Intravenous/oral opioids 0 2 2 Intravenous/oral NSAIDS or coxibs 0-1 2 2 Oral gapabentin or pregabalin 2 ? 2 Oral/rectal/intravenous paracetamol 1 ? 1

Intravenous tramadol ? ? 1 Intravenous ketamine 0 0-1 1 Epidural local anaesthetics 0-1 2 1-2 Epidural ketamine 0 1 ? Epidural opioids 2 0-2 2 Epidural clonidine 2 0-2 1-2 Spinal local anaesthetics 2 ? 2 Spinal opioids 1-2 ? ?

Wound infiltration with local anaesthetics 0-1 0-1 0-1 Intraperitoneal local anaesthetics - 0 - Cognitive treatment 2 0-1 ? Music ? 1 0 Acupuncture 1 0 1

Table 1. Summary effects of selected interventions on postoperative pain after abdominal hysterectomy according to the timing of administration. *Notes:* 0, no analgesic effect; 1, some analgesic effect; 2, considerable analgesic effect; ?, data not available; -, data irrelevant.

The anatomical basis of pain following hysterectomy is complex. In chapter 2, we have outlined some psychological and neurophysiological aspects of importance, and highlighted

2006; Persson, 2010).

**5. Pain and discomfort** 

**5.2 Extent of tissue trauma** 

**5.1 Management of postoperative pain** 

the importance of tissue trauma as the cornerstone of surgical stress response and subsequent activation of prostaglandins, cytokines, and nociceptive impulses for central nervous system modulation. These reactions are best known in the skin, in which a variety of vasoactive and irritative substances are released by tissue damage, causing a primary area of hypersensitivity, and a secondary activation of metabolites and nerve impulses in the spinal cord and central nervous system, in turn causing an additional hypersensitivity around the initial skin damage (Dirks, 2002). Brain centres value-set these painful impulses, affecting cognition, emotions, motor cortex and the autonomous nervous system. In the abdomen, the most pronounced effect during hysterectomy is activation of the vagus part of the autonomous nervous system, arising from stimulation of the neural tissue surrounding the uterus, leading to bradycardia, hypotension and nausea. Since the extent of cutaneous tissue damage during surgery determines the frame of postoperative pain complaints, the potential methods of prevention and treatment should mirror the desired clinical effect and the acceptability of side effects. In this respect, clinicians may judge inconsistently because priorities may vary according to specific demands afforded by the patient or the specific situation.

#### **5.3 Weak analgesics**

Tramadol is a weak opioid that has failed to convincingly show benefits (Wang, 2009). Intravenous paracetamol, a weak cyclooxygenase-inhibitor in the CNS, has gained interest in a recent study that implies an additional opioid-sparing effect when given preoperatively in abdominal hysterectomy (Arici, 2009). Rectal paracetamol, on the other hand, has almost no effect (Kvalsvik, 2003). As for NSAIDs and cox-2 inhibitors (which only differ in their side effect profiles and duration of action), many studies continue to be done by the pharmaceutical companies. New intravenous formulations given during surgery clearly confirm the almost ubiquitous opioid-sparing quality of these drugs, but they add nothing new to our spectrum of useful drugs, other than handy iv formulations. A much more interesting study using intrathecal ketorolac as adjuvant in patients with chronic or postoperative pain following vaginal hysterectomy showed that, while contributions of prostaglandins from the spinal cord must be evident in the development of pain, it is clearly only of value to block prostaglandin production (by ketorolac) if levels of prostaglandin E2 are high in the cerebrospinal fluid, an event which only occurs in a subset of patients. In addition, intrathecal ketorolac does not alter time to first morphine demand after surgery (Eisenach, 2010).

#### **5.4 New drugs**

Dexamethasone has been the focus of several studies, and when used alone in laparoscopic hysterectomy, it has clinically relevant opioid-sparing properties, as well as reducing the risk of dizziness (Jokela, 2009; Thangaswamy, 2010). When used in combination with pregabalin for abdominal hysterectomy, however, one study did not replicate these properties (Mathiesen, 2009), suggesting a potentially weak analgesic effect. It should also be noted that dexamethasone at 8 mg dose given before surgery causes significant hyperglycaemia within the first six postoperative hours (Eberhart, 2011). The value of gabapentin and pregabalin are confirmed in studies published after the Prospect review and may in fact also lead to faster recovery of bowel function (Turan, 2006; Durmus, 2007). The

Hysterectomy: Advances in Perioperative Care 235

wound is not entirely convincing. The main problem is duration of action, which is usually only a few hours. Due to the enhanced blood flow caused by inflammation, instilled drugs are washed out very quickly. For this reason, continuous catheter solutions seem promising (Gomez Rios, 2009). The placement of the catheter, however, is important and must be situated above the fascia to have any effect (Hafizoglu, 2008; Perniola, 2009). The physiological reason is perfectly straightforward, since most pain-conducting nerves are

The administration of various forms of TAP blocks has attracted a substantial interest during the last decade. The emergence of anaesthetic ultrasound, the simplicity of the block and the rapid effect on postoperative pain following many abdominal procedures are among the primary movers for the widespread use of the TAP block (Petersen, 2010; Børglum, 2011, Koscielniak-Nielsen, 2011). The block has evolved from an abdominal wall block administered blindly and based on anatomical landmarks to an ultrasound guided block, where the spread of the injectate can be seen to be deposited in the right compartment; i.e. in the neurovascular plane between the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscles (Rafi, 2001; McDonnell, 2007; Petersen, 2010). Recently, the block has been refined and described in more detail when the aim of various studies was to expand and ensure the analgesic efficacy of the block to cover the entire abdominal wall (Th6-Th12(L1)) (Hebbard, 2010; Børglum, 2011). Most interestingly, the TAP block administered blindly prior to surgical incision for total abdominal hysterectomy using the double loss-of-resistance technique together with the traditional landmark assistance has been proven to provide superior analgesia when compared to a placebo group (Carney, 2008). Patients in the active group had reduced 48-h morphine requirements, and a longer time to first PCA morphine request. Postoperative VAS pain scores at rest and on movement were reduced after TAP block at most time points assessed (over 48 hours) (Carney, 2008). It would seem that promising results in this area could merit further studies. An internet search provided proof to this matter, since novel studies registered on ClinicalTrials.com exhibited research projects concerning laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy and the efficacy of pre-operative TAP block on postoperative pain management. In addition, it would seem plausible that other types of truncal blocks such as ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral (TPV) blocks and rectus sheath blocks could well provide benefits in postoperative pain management following either abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy. Recently, TPV and rectus sheath blocks were given grade B and A recommendations for ultrasound guidance (United States Agency for health Care Policy and Research), respectively (Abrahams, 2010). An anatomically more caudal, but equally effective block option is bilateral ilioinguinal nerve block (Oriola, 2007). Thus, it seems straightforward to include any of these blocks in a

Nausea and vomiting rank high among feared postoperative complaints. Even to this day, they are also among the most common after any kind of hysterectomy. PONV may be caused by a variety of factors (Table 2). Commonly used algorithms for prevention should be taken as guidelines rather than statements of fact, because new techniques have changed

located in this area.

multimodal analgesic regime.

**5.8 Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting (PONV)** 

**5.7 Transverse Abdominis Plane (TAP) block** 

combination of gabapentin and a cox-2 inhibitor seems to be superior to either single agent for postoperative pain, as well as improvements in mood and sleep quality (Gilron, 2005). For gabapentin, 1200 mg/day is the appropriate dosage, whereas for pregabalin it is 300 mg/day (Ittichaikulthol, 2009). When compared to ketamine (low dose infusion), gabapentin seems to improve pain scores, but either drug seems equally efficacious as opioid-sparing agents (Sen, 2009; Pirim, 2006). For gabapentin, side effects include dizziness and sedation, and for ketamine, side effects include sleep disorders, hallucinations and a condition known as "dissociative anaesthesia" (to feel present, yet distant; to feel pain, yet not to care). When used within proposed dose limits, these side effects are exceedingly rare. The alpha-2 antagonist dexmedetomidine may be used as a continuous infusion during surgery or as an effective adjuvant to iv PCA morphine after abdominal hysterectomy, decreasing pain levels without increasing the incidence of side effects such as sedation or hemodynamic instability (Gurbet, 2006; Lin, 2009). Intraoperative dexmedetomidine may also reduce the risk of postoperative shivering (Elvan, 2008). Other CNS-active drugs such as droperidol, cyclizine and promethazine reduce postoperative morphine consumption and the frequency of nausea and vomiting compared to placebo (Chia, 2004; Lo, 2005). The biologically active drug melatonin, which is used for circadian rhythms and sleep, has recently been highlighted in two interesting studies. When given as an oral dose of 5 mg the night before and one hour before surgery, it has reduced opioid requirements and postoperative anxiety, and patients regain their circadian rhythm more quickly after surgery (Caumo, 2007). Given the demonstration that melatonin has both analgesic, antiinflammatory, and anxiolytic properties, and that higher anxiety makes the control of postoperative pain more difficult, one can hypothesize that melatonin is a promising agent to improve the control of postoperative pain. The efficacy of melatonin equals that of clonidine after abdominal hysterectomy (Caumo, 2009). Finally, intravenous lidocaine has both analgesic and antiinflammatory properties, which decrease the upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines, but clinical results have been disappointing (Yardeni, 2009; Bryson, 2010).

#### **5.5 Acupuncture**

Intraoperative use of acupuncture has been investigated and has been found to have no value in abdominal hysterectomy (Table 1). However, when applying classical needle acupuncture, electroacupuncture or capsicum plaster at certain acupoints (Zusanli, ST-36) preoperatively or postoperatively after abdominal hysterectomy, requests for morphine and antiemetics are significantly reduced (Lin, 2002; Kim, 2006; Grube, 2009). Other studies using electroacupuncture at 10 Hz have failed to confirm these findings, suggesting that acupuncture points need to be clearly defined and that the procedure itself requires special knowledge to perform (El-Rakshy, 2009).

#### **5.6 Local anaesthetic techniques**

The paradigm of blocking nerve conduction at the site of injury without the need for additional systemic analgesics is an enduring and very enticing proposition. While the need for such techniques are decidedly relevant in scenarios with considerable tissue damage such as conventional laparotomy, it seems appropriate to consider their use in laparoscopic surgery as well. The overall efficacy of local anaesthetic infiltration around the surgical

combination of gabapentin and a cox-2 inhibitor seems to be superior to either single agent for postoperative pain, as well as improvements in mood and sleep quality (Gilron, 2005). For gabapentin, 1200 mg/day is the appropriate dosage, whereas for pregabalin it is 300 mg/day (Ittichaikulthol, 2009). When compared to ketamine (low dose infusion), gabapentin seems to improve pain scores, but either drug seems equally efficacious as opioid-sparing agents (Sen, 2009; Pirim, 2006). For gabapentin, side effects include dizziness and sedation, and for ketamine, side effects include sleep disorders, hallucinations and a condition known as "dissociative anaesthesia" (to feel present, yet distant; to feel pain, yet not to care). When used within proposed dose limits, these side effects are exceedingly rare. The alpha-2 antagonist dexmedetomidine may be used as a continuous infusion during surgery or as an effective adjuvant to iv PCA morphine after abdominal hysterectomy, decreasing pain levels without increasing the incidence of side effects such as sedation or hemodynamic instability (Gurbet, 2006; Lin, 2009). Intraoperative dexmedetomidine may also reduce the risk of postoperative shivering (Elvan, 2008). Other CNS-active drugs such as droperidol, cyclizine and promethazine reduce postoperative morphine consumption and the frequency of nausea and vomiting compared to placebo (Chia, 2004; Lo, 2005). The biologically active drug melatonin, which is used for circadian rhythms and sleep, has recently been highlighted in two interesting studies. When given as an oral dose of 5 mg the night before and one hour before surgery, it has reduced opioid requirements and postoperative anxiety, and patients regain their circadian rhythm more quickly after surgery (Caumo, 2007). Given the demonstration that melatonin has both analgesic, antiinflammatory, and anxiolytic properties, and that higher anxiety makes the control of postoperative pain more difficult, one can hypothesize that melatonin is a promising agent to improve the control of postoperative pain. The efficacy of melatonin equals that of clonidine after abdominal hysterectomy (Caumo, 2009). Finally, intravenous lidocaine has both analgesic and antiinflammatory properties, which decrease the upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines, but clinical results have been disappointing (Yardeni, 2009;

Intraoperative use of acupuncture has been investigated and has been found to have no value in abdominal hysterectomy (Table 1). However, when applying classical needle acupuncture, electroacupuncture or capsicum plaster at certain acupoints (Zusanli, ST-36) preoperatively or postoperatively after abdominal hysterectomy, requests for morphine and antiemetics are significantly reduced (Lin, 2002; Kim, 2006; Grube, 2009). Other studies using electroacupuncture at 10 Hz have failed to confirm these findings, suggesting that acupuncture points need to be clearly defined and that the procedure itself requires special

The paradigm of blocking nerve conduction at the site of injury without the need for additional systemic analgesics is an enduring and very enticing proposition. While the need for such techniques are decidedly relevant in scenarios with considerable tissue damage such as conventional laparotomy, it seems appropriate to consider their use in laparoscopic surgery as well. The overall efficacy of local anaesthetic infiltration around the surgical

Bryson, 2010).

**5.5 Acupuncture** 

knowledge to perform (El-Rakshy, 2009).

**5.6 Local anaesthetic techniques** 

wound is not entirely convincing. The main problem is duration of action, which is usually only a few hours. Due to the enhanced blood flow caused by inflammation, instilled drugs are washed out very quickly. For this reason, continuous catheter solutions seem promising (Gomez Rios, 2009). The placement of the catheter, however, is important and must be situated above the fascia to have any effect (Hafizoglu, 2008; Perniola, 2009). The physiological reason is perfectly straightforward, since most pain-conducting nerves are located in this area.

### **5.7 Transverse Abdominis Plane (TAP) block**

The administration of various forms of TAP blocks has attracted a substantial interest during the last decade. The emergence of anaesthetic ultrasound, the simplicity of the block and the rapid effect on postoperative pain following many abdominal procedures are among the primary movers for the widespread use of the TAP block (Petersen, 2010; Børglum, 2011, Koscielniak-Nielsen, 2011). The block has evolved from an abdominal wall block administered blindly and based on anatomical landmarks to an ultrasound guided block, where the spread of the injectate can be seen to be deposited in the right compartment; i.e. in the neurovascular plane between the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscles (Rafi, 2001; McDonnell, 2007; Petersen, 2010). Recently, the block has been refined and described in more detail when the aim of various studies was to expand and ensure the analgesic efficacy of the block to cover the entire abdominal wall (Th6-Th12(L1)) (Hebbard, 2010; Børglum, 2011). Most interestingly, the TAP block administered blindly prior to surgical incision for total abdominal hysterectomy using the double loss-of-resistance technique together with the traditional landmark assistance has been proven to provide superior analgesia when compared to a placebo group (Carney, 2008). Patients in the active group had reduced 48-h morphine requirements, and a longer time to first PCA morphine request. Postoperative VAS pain scores at rest and on movement were reduced after TAP block at most time points assessed (over 48 hours) (Carney, 2008). It would seem that promising results in this area could merit further studies. An internet search provided proof to this matter, since novel studies registered on ClinicalTrials.com exhibited research projects concerning laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy and the efficacy of pre-operative TAP block on postoperative pain management. In addition, it would seem plausible that other types of truncal blocks such as ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral (TPV) blocks and rectus sheath blocks could well provide benefits in postoperative pain management following either abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy. Recently, TPV and rectus sheath blocks were given grade B and A recommendations for ultrasound guidance (United States Agency for health Care Policy and Research), respectively (Abrahams, 2010). An anatomically more caudal, but equally effective block option is bilateral ilioinguinal nerve block (Oriola, 2007). Thus, it seems straightforward to include any of these blocks in a multimodal analgesic regime.

#### **5.8 Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting (PONV)**

Nausea and vomiting rank high among feared postoperative complaints. Even to this day, they are also among the most common after any kind of hysterectomy. PONV may be caused by a variety of factors (Table 2). Commonly used algorithms for prevention should be taken as guidelines rather than statements of fact, because new techniques have changed

Hysterectomy: Advances in Perioperative Care 237

lasting weeks to months is more common following regional anaesthesia, but the incidence is largely unknown. Its pathophysiology also remains murky but may include compression or stretching effects of nerve fibres, toxic effects of local anaesthetic drugs, and an inherent increased susceptibility to compression effects (known as HNPP, hereditary liability to neuropathic pressure palsies). Patients having HNPP often complain of prolonged dysaesthesias, wrist pain, and strange sensory sensations after even banal experiences. Nerve damage resulting from inadequate positioning during surgery in the lithotomy position, for instance, may be prevented by soft padding, frequent movement during surgery, and continuous monitoring of vascular supply by pulse oximetry. Brachial plexus damage may occur if arms are hyperextended from the axis of the body in steep Trendelenburg

The concept of a fast-track surgical protocol for hysterectomy was introduced by Kehlet and associates a decade ago (Møller, 2001). The protocol included optimized information, welldefined anaesthesia and fluid therapy, early mobilization, early food intake and the concept of multimodal pain treatment. The idea was to combine several modalities of analgesic techniques, systemic to neuraxial, in order to harvest tbe benefits of synergistic effects. Using these concepts, the authors were even then able to optimize length of stay in abdominal hysterectomy to approximate that of laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, which strongly suggests that 1) the concept works, and that 2) benefits from randomized trials were until then not adequately transformed and utilized in clinical practice. Patients were simply not asked to get out of bed and take care of themselves, in spite of several well-meaning treatments and preventive measures that should facilitate ambulation and self-sufficiency. While the concept of fast-track protocols have continued to expand in recent years, there are however limits to the number of complaints that can be prevented by this paradigm. In a comprehensive cohort study looking at the immediate recovery profile after abdominal hysterectomy, several important points emerge (Jensen, 2009): 25% experience severe pain in spite of preoperatively placed epidurals, but only 8% experience PONV (patients were pretreated with three antiemetics). However, a complicated recovery, defined as the presence of severe complaints (pain or PONV), with more than five treatment interventions in the postanaesthesia care unit or a length of stay more than two hours, was observed in half the patients. The patency of the epidural was a key issue, and failed epidurals or patients not wishing/having epidurals were at particularly high risk of complaints. Inadequate pain treatment was the principal factor responsible for prolonged stay in the postanaesthesia care unit, causing increased opioid demands, nausea, dependency on oxygen supply, and sedation. Recent studies rightfully discuss the optimal surgical and anaesthetic techniques, but there are no clear answers (Sarmini, 2005; Abdelmonem, 2006; Wodlin, 2011). Spinal anaesthesia has some advantages to general anaesthesia by reducing immediate postoperative discomfort, opioid demands and duration of sick leave, but spinal opioids increase the risk of itching, with no differences in PONV (Wodlin, 2011a; Wodlin, 2011b). A similar fast-track study seems to imply that total intravenous anaesthesia may be superior to inhalational anaesthesia by reducing nausea, length of hospital stay, and duration of an indwelling urinary catheter (Kroon,

positioning (Ben-David, 1997).

**6. Administrative logistics** 

**6.1 Fast-track protocols** 

the foundation for the specific frequencies of PONV cited in the algorithms (Eberhart, 2000; Gan, 2007). Another methodological problem is frequency of PONV, which often differs considerably (0-80%) in comparable studies. The good part of the story is that PONV usually abates within 24 hours, but because of its frequency and enormous impact on well-being, clinicians must hold a strong focus on its prevention. While studies on PONV are heterogeneous, randomized data suggest that combinations of at least two antiemetics are effective for prophylaxis, reducing the risk of PONV to less than 20% (Piper, 2003; Chu, 2008). Antiemetics may also with advantage be added to patient-controlled analgesia infusions (Boonmak, 2007). The specific type of antiemetic is less important and should be guided by the desired effect and potential side effects (Bilgin, 2010). For instance, when PONV may be aggravated by anxiety, a benzodiazepine or sedative antiemetic is preferable (Elhakim, 2009; Fujii 2010; Huh, 2010). Antiemetics used for prophylaxis may also be used for treatment. Again, the use of acupuncture has reliably been shown to prevent PONV. Of special importance is the P6 point at the wrist (Frey, 2009; Kim, 2011). The Korean K-D2 or auricular points are equally useful (Ki, 2002; Kim, 2003).


Table 2. Definite or presumed risk factors for PONV in females undergoing hysterectomy.


Table 3. Modalities in prevention and treatment of PONV.

#### **5.9 Development of chronic pain**

Chronic pain is frequently observed several months after laparotomy (7 to 37%, depending on incision) (Perkins, 2000); the most apparent cause is direct nerve damage by severance or compression, leading to a host of nerve changes including peripheral receptor and spinal neuron changes, hyperalgesia/allodynia, ectopic activity and wind-up phenomena. Prevention is of key importance, since major breakthroughs in treatment have not yet emerged. In spite of an enormous amount of literature dealing with the prevention, pathophysiology and treatment of chronic pain, we are still at the very beginning of our understanding. Every effort should therefore be directed at minimally invasive surgical techniques. Persistent nerve damage resulting from epidural, spinal or regional anaesthesia is exceedingly rare and occurs in the order of 1:5000. Transient nerve damage (neuropraxia)

the foundation for the specific frequencies of PONV cited in the algorithms (Eberhart, 2000; Gan, 2007). Another methodological problem is frequency of PONV, which often differs considerably (0-80%) in comparable studies. The good part of the story is that PONV usually abates within 24 hours, but because of its frequency and enormous impact on well-being, clinicians must hold a strong focus on its prevention. While studies on PONV are heterogeneous, randomized data suggest that combinations of at least two antiemetics are effective for prophylaxis, reducing the risk of PONV to less than 20% (Piper, 2003; Chu, 2008). Antiemetics may also with advantage be added to patient-controlled analgesia infusions (Boonmak, 2007). The specific type of antiemetic is less important and should be guided by the desired effect and potential side effects (Bilgin, 2010). For instance, when PONV may be aggravated by anxiety, a benzodiazepine or sedative antiemetic is preferable (Elhakim, 2009; Fujii 2010; Huh, 2010). Antiemetics used for prophylaxis may also be used for treatment. Again, the use of acupuncture has reliably been shown to prevent PONV. Of special importance is the P6 point at the wrist (Frey, 2009; Kim, 2011). The Korean K-D2 or

> Females Non-smokers Previous PONV Motion sickness

Neostigmine General anaesthesia

Pain Anxiety

Table 2. Definite or presumed risk factors for PONV in females undergoing hysterectomy.

Benzodiazepines Propofol Chlorpromazine Antihistamines Droperidol, haloperidol Metoclopramide Dexamethasone Serotonine antagonists Ephedrine

Chronic pain is frequently observed several months after laparotomy (7 to 37%, depending on incision) (Perkins, 2000); the most apparent cause is direct nerve damage by severance or compression, leading to a host of nerve changes including peripheral receptor and spinal neuron changes, hyperalgesia/allodynia, ectopic activity and wind-up phenomena. Prevention is of key importance, since major breakthroughs in treatment have not yet emerged. In spite of an enormous amount of literature dealing with the prevention, pathophysiology and treatment of chronic pain, we are still at the very beginning of our understanding. Every effort should therefore be directed at minimally invasive surgical techniques. Persistent nerve damage resulting from epidural, spinal or regional anaesthesia is exceedingly rare and occurs in the order of 1:5000. Transient nerve damage (neuropraxia)

Hormonal imbalance Obesity

Early mobilization and transport Laparoscopy

Opioids Inhalational anaesthetics and N2O

auricular points are equally useful (Ki, 2002; Kim, 2003).

Effective pain management P6 acupressure Table 3. Modalities in prevention and treatment of PONV.

DEFINITE risk factors for PONV

PRESUMED risk factors for PONV

**5.9 Development of chronic pain** 

Prolonged surgery

lasting weeks to months is more common following regional anaesthesia, but the incidence is largely unknown. Its pathophysiology also remains murky but may include compression or stretching effects of nerve fibres, toxic effects of local anaesthetic drugs, and an inherent increased susceptibility to compression effects (known as HNPP, hereditary liability to neuropathic pressure palsies). Patients having HNPP often complain of prolonged dysaesthesias, wrist pain, and strange sensory sensations after even banal experiences. Nerve damage resulting from inadequate positioning during surgery in the lithotomy position, for instance, may be prevented by soft padding, frequent movement during surgery, and continuous monitoring of vascular supply by pulse oximetry. Brachial plexus damage may occur if arms are hyperextended from the axis of the body in steep Trendelenburg positioning (Ben-David, 1997).

## **6. Administrative logistics**

#### **6.1 Fast-track protocols**

The concept of a fast-track surgical protocol for hysterectomy was introduced by Kehlet and associates a decade ago (Møller, 2001). The protocol included optimized information, welldefined anaesthesia and fluid therapy, early mobilization, early food intake and the concept of multimodal pain treatment. The idea was to combine several modalities of analgesic techniques, systemic to neuraxial, in order to harvest tbe benefits of synergistic effects. Using these concepts, the authors were even then able to optimize length of stay in abdominal hysterectomy to approximate that of laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, which strongly suggests that 1) the concept works, and that 2) benefits from randomized trials were until then not adequately transformed and utilized in clinical practice. Patients were simply not asked to get out of bed and take care of themselves, in spite of several well-meaning treatments and preventive measures that should facilitate ambulation and self-sufficiency. While the concept of fast-track protocols have continued to expand in recent years, there are however limits to the number of complaints that can be prevented by this paradigm. In a comprehensive cohort study looking at the immediate recovery profile after abdominal hysterectomy, several important points emerge (Jensen, 2009): 25% experience severe pain in spite of preoperatively placed epidurals, but only 8% experience PONV (patients were pretreated with three antiemetics). However, a complicated recovery, defined as the presence of severe complaints (pain or PONV), with more than five treatment interventions in the postanaesthesia care unit or a length of stay more than two hours, was observed in half the patients. The patency of the epidural was a key issue, and failed epidurals or patients not wishing/having epidurals were at particularly high risk of complaints. Inadequate pain treatment was the principal factor responsible for prolonged stay in the postanaesthesia care unit, causing increased opioid demands, nausea, dependency on oxygen supply, and sedation. Recent studies rightfully discuss the optimal surgical and anaesthetic techniques, but there are no clear answers (Sarmini, 2005; Abdelmonem, 2006; Wodlin, 2011). Spinal anaesthesia has some advantages to general anaesthesia by reducing immediate postoperative discomfort, opioid demands and duration of sick leave, but spinal opioids increase the risk of itching, with no differences in PONV (Wodlin, 2011a; Wodlin, 2011b). A similar fast-track study seems to imply that total intravenous anaesthesia may be superior to inhalational anaesthesia by reducing nausea, length of hospital stay, and duration of an indwelling urinary catheter (Kroon,

Hysterectomy: Advances in Perioperative Care 239

there is a need for adequate information to properly balance expectations and coping strategies, and a need for focused postoperative follow-up, since people are nowadays discharged early with health complaints and limitations in activities of daily living persisting for weeks or even months after surgery. A useful method for transferring procedure-specific evidence from controlled studies into the very real and heterogeneous world of uncontrolled patients and health care professionals is also highly welcomed. Can

Abdelmonem A, Wilson H, Pasic R. Observational comparison of abdominal, vaginal and

Abrahams MS, Horn J-L, Noles LM, Aziz MF. Evidence-based medicine. Ultrasound gui-

Akural EI, Salomäki TE, Bloigu AH, Ryhänen P, Tekay AH, Alahuhta SM, Surcel HM. The

Akural EI, Salomäki TE, Tekay AH, Bloigu AH, Alahuhta SM. Pre-emptive effect of epidural

Arici S, Gurbet A, Türker G, Yavascaoglu B, Sahin S. Preemptive analgesic effects of intravenous paracetamol in total abdominal hysterectomy. *Agri* 2009; 21: 54-61 Aziz A, bergquist C, Brännström M, Nordholm L, Silfverstolpe G. Differences in aspects of

Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, Scales CD, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ. Cost comparison among

Beilin B, Bessler H, Mayburd E, Smirnov G et al. Effects of preemptive analgesia on pain and cytokine production in the postoperative period. *Anesthesiology* 2003; 98: 151-5 Ben-David B, Stahl S. Prognosis of intraoperaive brachial plexus injury: a review of 22 cases.

Bharti N, Chari P. Epidural butorphanol-bupivacaine analgesia for postoperative pain relief

Bhattacharya SM, Jha A. A comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after

Bilgin TE, Birbicer H, Ozer Z, Doruk N, Tok E, Oral U. A comparative study of the anti-

Brandsborg B, Dueholm M, Nikolajsen L, Kehlet H, Jensen TS. A prospective study of risk factors for pain persisting 4 months after hysterectomy. *Clin J Pain* 2009; 25: 263-8 Bryson GL, Charapov I, Krolczyk G, Taljaard M, Reid D. Intravenous lidocaine does not

undergoing gynecological surgery. *Med Sci Monit* 2010; 16: CR336-41 Boonmak P, Boonmak S, Bunsaengjaroen P et al. Antiemetic effect of ondansetron 0.2 mg

mL-1 in PCA morphine solution. *Eur J Anaesthesiol* 2007; 24: 664-7

emetic efficacy of dexamethasone, ondansetron, and metoclopramide in patients

reduce length of hospital stay following abdominal hysterectomy. *Can J Anaesth*

after abdominal hysterectomy. *J Clin Anesth* 2009; 21: 19-22

natural and surgical menopause. *Maturitas* 2010; 66: 431-4

sufentanil in abdominal hysterectomy. *Br J Anaesth* 2002; 88: 803-8

dance for truncal blocks. *Res Anesth Pain Med* 2010; 35:36-42

laparoscopic hysterectomy as performed at a university teaching hospital. *J Reprod* 

effects of pre-emptive epidural sufentanil on human immune function. *Acta Anaesth* 

personality and sexuality between perimenopausal women making different choices regarding prophylactic oophorectomy at elective hysterectomy. *Acta Obstet* 

robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. *Obstet* 

we succeed in this? Only the future will tell.

*Med* 2006; 51: 945-54

*Scand* 2004; 48: 750-5

*Gynecol Scand* 2005; 84: 854-9

*Br J Anaesthesia* 1997; 79: 440-5

*Gynecol* 2010; 116: 685-93

2010; 57: 759-66

**8. References** 

2010). The case for early urinary catheter removal, however, is offset by an increased risk of urinary retention episodes requiring re-catheterisation (Chai, 2011).

#### **6.2 The economics of hysterectomy**

Hot on the heels of the fast-track protocols, hospital administrators have become aware of the potential to reap the benefits of this new paradigm. Optimal logistics in the surgical suite, short durations of surgery, few necessary interventions or short length of stay in the postanaesthesia care unit are pivotal issues for increasing the number of surgeries that can be performed in a day. In the surgical ward, severity of activity-limiting and treatmentnecessary complaints determine, besides surgical complications, the degree of observation and the level of competency that needs to be present, and ultimately the length of hospital stay. This length of stay in turn determines which days elective patients can be scheduled for surgery (typically monday through wednesday), so that only residual problems persist in the weekend and a clean slate of patients can be admitted the following monday (Roumm, 2005). Day surgery may be placed in the extreme end of the spectrum, facilitating quick patient flow, fewer overnight beds and lower costs (Levy, 2005), while complicated (acute, laparotomic) surgery may be placed in the other end. From the administrative point, the balance between the two extremes is as delicate as a double-edged sword: day surgery may reduce costs per patient, but increasing number of patients puts considerable pressure on optimized flow, well-functioning protocols, teamwork, the implementation of lean principles, patient profiles (ASA health status 1-2), and staff enthusiasm. Complicated cases puts pressure on staff competency, individual solutions and across-department collaborations. It is for these very reasons that medical technology assessments are important in determining the true logistical value of new anaesthetic or surgical techniques, because each new intervention affects the entire system of people and work descriptions in the surgical food chain. Studies investigating financial costs, e.g. the introduction of robotic surgery, should not uncritically be taken at face value: they often fail to take these issues into account and merely represent fictive scenarios that may or may not be applicable (Barnett, 2010; Oehler, 2011). In a wider perspective, the cost for the society may not be reflected in the immediate hospital costs. A recent study suggests that the majority of women extend their sick leave beyond the recommended period on their own initiative, despite the ward's long recommended period of sick leave (Johansen, 2008).

#### **7. Conclusions**

From the topics discussed above, several unmet patient needs and clear avenues of research still need to be pursued; even though multimodal, evidence-based treatment regimens are conducted efficiently and in detail, many patients still suffer from unacceptable postoperative complaints. The reasons are complex and include definite limitations in the current potentials of anaesthesia and surgery, stress response, variability among patients in psychological or genetic disposition, and downright treatment failures or withdrawals because of unacceptable side effects. Certain surgical techniques are related to more complaints. Pharmacologically, new drugs have not lived up to their potential to facilitate opioid-free analgesia. Recent advances in local anaesthetic techniques such as the transverse abdominis plane block may help solve this problem, but we are still in want of a magic bullet to alleviate nausea, dizziness, exhaustion and failed ambulation. From a patient perspective, there is a need for adequate information to properly balance expectations and coping strategies, and a need for focused postoperative follow-up, since people are nowadays discharged early with health complaints and limitations in activities of daily living persisting for weeks or even months after surgery. A useful method for transferring procedure-specific evidence from controlled studies into the very real and heterogeneous world of uncontrolled patients and health care professionals is also highly welcomed. Can we succeed in this? Only the future will tell.

#### **8. References**

238 Hysterectomy

2010). The case for early urinary catheter removal, however, is offset by an increased risk of

Hot on the heels of the fast-track protocols, hospital administrators have become aware of the potential to reap the benefits of this new paradigm. Optimal logistics in the surgical suite, short durations of surgery, few necessary interventions or short length of stay in the postanaesthesia care unit are pivotal issues for increasing the number of surgeries that can be performed in a day. In the surgical ward, severity of activity-limiting and treatmentnecessary complaints determine, besides surgical complications, the degree of observation and the level of competency that needs to be present, and ultimately the length of hospital stay. This length of stay in turn determines which days elective patients can be scheduled for surgery (typically monday through wednesday), so that only residual problems persist in the weekend and a clean slate of patients can be admitted the following monday (Roumm, 2005). Day surgery may be placed in the extreme end of the spectrum, facilitating quick patient flow, fewer overnight beds and lower costs (Levy, 2005), while complicated (acute, laparotomic) surgery may be placed in the other end. From the administrative point, the balance between the two extremes is as delicate as a double-edged sword: day surgery may reduce costs per patient, but increasing number of patients puts considerable pressure on optimized flow, well-functioning protocols, teamwork, the implementation of lean principles, patient profiles (ASA health status 1-2), and staff enthusiasm. Complicated cases puts pressure on staff competency, individual solutions and across-department collaborations. It is for these very reasons that medical technology assessments are important in determining the true logistical value of new anaesthetic or surgical techniques, because each new intervention affects the entire system of people and work descriptions in the surgical food chain. Studies investigating financial costs, e.g. the introduction of robotic surgery, should not uncritically be taken at face value: they often fail to take these issues into account and merely represent fictive scenarios that may or may not be applicable (Barnett, 2010; Oehler, 2011). In a wider perspective, the cost for the society may not be reflected in the immediate hospital costs. A recent study suggests that the majority of women extend their sick leave beyond the recommended period on their own initiative, despite the ward's long

From the topics discussed above, several unmet patient needs and clear avenues of research still need to be pursued; even though multimodal, evidence-based treatment regimens are conducted efficiently and in detail, many patients still suffer from unacceptable postoperative complaints. The reasons are complex and include definite limitations in the current potentials of anaesthesia and surgery, stress response, variability among patients in psychological or genetic disposition, and downright treatment failures or withdrawals because of unacceptable side effects. Certain surgical techniques are related to more complaints. Pharmacologically, new drugs have not lived up to their potential to facilitate opioid-free analgesia. Recent advances in local anaesthetic techniques such as the transverse abdominis plane block may help solve this problem, but we are still in want of a magic bullet to alleviate nausea, dizziness, exhaustion and failed ambulation. From a patient perspective,

urinary retention episodes requiring re-catheterisation (Chai, 2011).

**6.2 The economics of hysterectomy** 

recommended period of sick leave (Johansen, 2008).

**7. Conclusions** 


Hysterectomy: Advances in Perioperative Care 241

Demirbilek S, Ganidagli S, Aksoy N, Becerik C, Baysal Z. The effects of remifentanil and

Di Chiara G. Nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine: differential role in behavior and

Digman JM. Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. *Ann Rev Psychology*

Dirks J, Møiniche S, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB. Mechanisms of postoperative pain: clinical indica-

Durmus M, Kadir But A, Saricicek V, Ilksen Toprak H. The post-operative analgesic effects

Eberhart LH, Högel J, Seeling W, Staack AM, Geldner G. Evaluation of three risk scores to predict postoperative nausea and vomiting. *Acta Anaesth Scand* 2000; 44: 480-8 Eisenach JC, Curry R, Rauck R, Pan P, Yaksh TL. Role of spinal cyclooxygenase in human

El-Rakshy M, Clark SC, Thompson J, Thant M. Effect of intraoperative electroacupuncture

Elhakim M, Abd-elfattah H, El-Din DN et al. Midazolam as an antiemetic in patients recei-

Ellström MA, Aström M, Möller A, Olsson JH, Hahlin M. A randomized trial comparing

Ellström MA, Jerhamre K, Junskog K. A randomized trial comparing changes in sexual

Elvan EG, Oc B, Uzun S, Karabulut E, Coskun F, Aypar U. Dexmedetomidine and

Farouk S. Pre-incisional epidural magnesium provides pre-emptive and preventive anal-

Fassoulaki A, Melemeni A, Paraskeva A, Siafaka I, Sarantopoulos C. Postoperative pain and

Flory N, Bissonnette F, Amsel RT, Binik YM. The psychosocial outcomes of total and subtotal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. *J Sex Med* 2006; 3: 483-91 Frey UH, Scharmann P, Löhlein C, Peters J. P6 acustimulation effectively decreases postoperative nausea and vomiting in high-risk patients. *Br J Anaesth* 2009; 102: 620-5 Fujii Y, Itakura M. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to

postoperative and chronic pain. *Anesthesiology* 2010; 112: 1225-33

nal hysterectomy. *Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand* 2003; 82: 871-5

abdominal hysterectomy. *J Clin Anesth* 2004; 16: 358-63

addiction. *Behav Brain Res* 2002; 137: 75-114

controlled trial. *Acupunct Med* 2009; 27: 9-12

*Obstet Gynecol Scand* 2010; 89: 65-70

*Eur J Anaesthesiol* 2008; 25: 357-64

*Anesth Analg* 2008; 107: 1715-9

1990; 41: 417-40

1591-6

alfentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on the endocrine response to

tions for a contribution of central neuronal sensitization. *Anesthesiology* 2002; 97:

of a combination of gabapentin and paracetamol in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized clinical trial. *Acta Anaesth Scand* 2007; 51: 299-304 Eberhart LH, Graf J, Morin AM, Stief T, Kalder M, Lattermann R, Schricker T. Randomised

controlled trial of the effect of oral premedication with dexamethasone on hyperglycaemic response to abdominal hysterectomy. *Eur J Anaesthesiol* 2011; 28: 195-201

on postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, nausea and sedation: a randomised

ving epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief. *J Opioid Manag* 2009; 5: 189-95

changes in psychological well-being and sexuality after laparoscopic and abdomi-

health and psychological well-being after subtotal and total hysterectomies. *Acta* 

postoperative shivering in patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy.

gesia in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. *Br J Anaesth* 2008; 101: 694-9.

analgesic requirements after anesthesia with sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol.

assess the antiemetic effects of midazolam on postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. *Clin Ther* 2010; 32: 1633-7


Børglum J, Maschmann C, Belhage B, Jensen K. Ultrasound-guided bilateral dual trans-

Candiani M, Izzo S, Bulfoni A, Riparini J, Ronzoni S, Marconi A. Laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology. *Am J Obstet Gynecol* 2009; 200: 368.e1-7 Carney J, McDonnell, JG, Ochna A, Bhinder R, Laffey JG. The transversus abdominis plane

Caumo W, Hidalgo MP, Schmidt AP, Iwamoto CW, Adamatti LC, Bergmann J, Ferreira MB.

Caumo W, Schmidt AP, Schneider CN, Bergmann J, Iwamoto CW, Bandeira D, Ferreira MB.

Charoenkwan K, Phillipson G, Vutyavanich T. Early versus delayed (traditional) oral fluids

Chen WH, Liu K, Tan PH, Chia YY. Effects of postoperative background PCA morphine

Cheung LH, Callaghan P, Chang AM. A controlled trial of psycho-educational interventions

Chia YY, Lo Y, Liu K, Tan PH, Chung NC, Ko NH. The effect of promethazine on

Chou WY, Wang CH, Liu PH, Liu CC, Tseng CC, Jawan B. Human opioid receptor A118G

undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. *Anaesthesia* 2002; 57: 740-6 Caumo W, Levandovski R, Hidalgo MP. Preoperative anxiolytic effect of melatonin and clo-

undergoing abdominal surgery. *Acta Anaesth Scand* 2002; 46: 1265-71 Caumo W, Torres F, Moreira NL, Auzani JA, Monteiro CA, Londero G, Ribeiro DF, Hidalgo

minal hysterectomy. *Anesth Analg* 2008; 107: 2056-2060

terectomy. *J Pain* 2009; 10: 100-8

*Scand* 2011; 90: 478-82

*Scand* 2004; 48: 625-30

207-16

*Cochrane Database Syst Rev* 2007; 17: CD004508

abdominal hysterectomy. *J Clin Anesth* 2011; 23: 124-9

55: 658-663

versus abdominis plane block: a new four-point approach. *Acta Anaesth Scand* 2011;

block provides effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdo-

Effect of pre-operative anxiolysis on postoperative pain response in patients

nidine on postoperative pain and morphine in patients undergoing abdominal hys-

Preoperative predictors of moderate to intense acute postoperative pain in patients

MP. The clinical impact of preoperative melatonin on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. *Anesth Analg* 2007; 105: 1263-71 Chai J, Pun TC. A prospective randomized trial to compare immediate and 24-hour delayed

catheter removal following total abdominal hysterectomy. *Acta Obstet Gynecol* 

and food for reducing complications after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery.

infusion on pain management and related side effects in patients undergoing

in preparing Chinese women for elective hysterectomy. *Int J Nurs Stud* 2003; 40:

postoperative pain: a comparison of preoperative, postoperative, and placebo administration in patients following total abdominal hysterectomy. *Acta Anaesth* 

polymorphism affects intravenous patient-controlled analgesia morphine consumption after total abdominal hysterectomy. *Anesthesiology* 2006; 105: 334-7 Chu CC, Shieh JP, Tzeng JI, Chen JY, Lee Y, Wang JJ. The prophylactic effect of haloperidol

plus dexamethasone on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. *Anesth Analg* 2008; 106: 1402-6 Davies JE, Doyle PM. Quality of life studies in unselected gynaecological outpatients and inpatients before and after hysterectomy. *J Obstet Gynaecol* 2002; 22: 523-6


Hysterectomy: Advances in Perioperative Care 243

Henneberg SW, Rosenborg D, Weber Jensen E, Ahn P, Burgdorff B, Thomsen LL. Peropera-

Herzog TJ, Coleman RL, Guerrieri JP, Gabriel K, Du W, Techner L, Fort JG, Wallin B. A

Heye ML, Foster L, Bartlett MK, Adkins S. A preoperative intervention for pain reduction,

Hong JY, Lim KT. Effect of preemptive epidural analgesia on cytokine response and

Huh BK, Jung S, White W, Jeon Y. Anti-emetic effect of midazolam added to morphine

Ihn CH, Joo JD, Choi JW, Kim DW, Jeon YS et al. Comparison of stress hormone response,

Jensen K, Kehlet H, Lund CM. Postoperative recovery profile after elective abdominal

Johansen P, Al-Khafagi SK, Thøstesen LM, Lauszus FF, Rasmussen KL. Analysis of need for

Johnson DT, Spielberger CD. The effects of relaxation training and the passage of time on

Jokela RM, Ahonen JV, Tallgren MK, Marjakangas PC et al. The effective analgesic dose of dexamethasone after laparoscopic hysterectomy. *Anesth Analg* 2009; 109: 607-15 Jørgensen H, Fomsgaard JS, Dirks J, Wetterslev J, Andreasson B, Dahl JB. Effect of peri- and

Kain ZN, Sevarino FB, Rinder C, Pincus S, Alexander GM, Ivy M, Heninger G. Preoperative

Kalkman CJ, Visser K, Moen J, Bonsel GJ, Grobbee DE, Moons KG. Preoperative prediction

Karaman S, Kocabas S, Uyar M, Zincircioglu C, Firat V. Intrathecal morphine: effects on

Karanci AN, Dirik G. Predictors of pre- and postoperative anxiety in emergency surgery

double-blind trial. *J Med Assoc Thai* 2009; 92: 1318-23

sick leave after hysterectomy. *Ugeskr Læger* 2008; 170: 1465-8

abdominal hysterectomy. *Br J Anaesth* 2001; 87: 577-83

of severe postoperative pain. *Pain* 2003; 105: 415-23

abdominal hysterectomy. *Adv Ther* 2006; 23: 295-306

measures of state- and trait-anxiety. *J Clin Psychol* 1968; 24: 20-3

regime. *Eur J Anaesthesiol* 2009; 26: 382-8

tomy. *Anesthesiology* 2001; 94: 415-22

patients. *J Psychosom Res* 203; 55: 363-9

improved mobility, and self-efficacy. *Appl Nurs Res* 2002; 15: 174-83

*Anaesth Scand* 2005; 49: 293-6

*Gynecol* 2006; 195: 445-53

*Care* 2010; 38: 481-5

*Anesth Pain Med* 2008; 33: 44-51

tive depth of anaesthesia may influence postoperative opioid requirements. *Acta* 

double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III study of the safety of alvimopan in patients who undergo simple total abdominal hysterectomy. *Am J Obstet* 

postoperative pain in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. *Reg* 

patient-controlled analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy. *Anaesth Intensive* 

interleukin-6 and anaesthetic characteristics of two anaesthetic techniques: volatile induction and maintenance of anaesthesia using sevoflurane versus total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol and remifentanil. *J Int Med Res* 2009; 37: 1760-71 Ittichaikulthol W, Virankabutra T, Kunopart M, Khamhom W, Putarawuthichai P, Rungphet

S. Effects of pregabalin on post operative morphine consumption and pain after abdominal hysterectomy with/without salpingo-oophorectomy: a randomized,

hysterectomy: a prospective, observational study of a multimodal anaesthetic

postoperative epidural anaesthesia on pain and gastrointestinal function after

anxiolysis and postoperative recovery in women undergoing abdominal hysterec-

perioperative hemodynamics, postoperative analgesia, and stress response for total


Gan TJ, Meyer TA, Apfel CC, Chung F, Davis PJ, Habib AS et al. Society for Ambulatory

Garry R, Fountain J, Brown J, Manca A, Mason S, Sculpher M, Napp V, Bridgman S, Gray J,

Ghezzi F, Uccella S, Cromi A, Siesto G, Serati M, Bogani G, Bolis P. Postoperative pain after

Gilron I, Orr E, Tu D, O'Neill JP, Zamora JE, Bell AC. A placebo-controlled randomized

Gomez Rios MA, Vázquez Barreiro L, Nieto Serradilla L, Diz Gomez JC, Lopez Alvarez S.

Gorlero F, Lijoi D, Biamonti M, Lorenzi P, Pullé A, Ragni N. Hysterectomy and women satisfaction: total versus subtotal technique. *Arch Gynecol Obstet* 2008; 278: 405-10 Grube T, Uhlemann C, Weiss T, Meissner W. Influence of acupuncture on postoperative

Gütl P, Greimel ER, Roth R, Winter R. Women's sexual behavior, body image and satis-

Hafizoglu MC, Katircioglu K, Ozkalkanli MY, Savaci S. Bupivacaine infusion above or

Hansen CT, Sørensen M, Møller C, Ottesen B, Kehlet H. Effect of laxatives on gastro-

Hashimoto Y, Baba S, Koh H, Takagi H, Ishihara H. Anxiolytic effect of preoperative showing of anesthesia video for surgical patients. *Anesth Analg* 1993; 42: 611-6 Hastie BA, Riley JL, Robinson ME, Glover T, Campbell CM, Staud R, Fillingim RB. Cluster analysis of multiple experimental pain modalities. *Pain* 2005; 116: 227-37 Hebbard PD, Barrington MJ, Vasey C. Ultrasound-guided continuous oblique subcostal

Hedenstierna G, Edmark L. Mechanisms of atelectasis in the perioperative period. *Best Pract* 

controlled randomized study. *Am J Obstet Gynecol* 2007; 196: 311.e1-7 Hartmann KE, Ma C, Lamvu GM, Langenberg PW, Steege JF, Kjerulff KH. Quality of life

abdominal surgery. *J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol* 2002; 23: 51-9

mized trial. *Am J Obstet Gynecol* 2010; 203: 118.e1-8

*Anesth Analg* 2007; 105: 1615-28

terectomy. *Pain* 2005; 113: 191-200

*Anesth Analg* 2008; 107: 2068-72

depression. *Obstet Gynecol* 2004; 104: 701-9

que. *Reg Anesth Pain Med* 2010; 35: 436-441

*Res Clin Anaesthesiol* 2010; 24: 157-69

*Assess* 2004; 8: 1-154

2006; 53: 646-52

Anesthesia guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Lilford R. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. *Health Technol* 

laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a rando-

clinical trial of perioperative administration of gabapentin, rofecoxib and their combination for spontaneous and movement-evoked pain after abdominal hys-

Efficacy of a continuous infusion of local anesthetic into the surgical wound for pain relief after abdominal hysterectomy. *Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim* 2009; 56: 417-24

pain, nausea and vomiting after visceral surgery: a prospective, randomized comparative study of metamizole and standard treatment. *Schmerz* 2009; 23: 370-6 Gurbet A, Basagan-Mogol E, Turker G, Ugun F, Kaya FN, Ozcan B. Intraoperative infusion

of dexmedetomidine reduces perioperative analgesic requirements. *Can J Anaesth*

faction with surgical outcomes after hysterectomy: a comparison of vaginal and

below the fascia for postoperative pain treatment after abdominal hysterectomy.

intestinal functional recovery in fast-track hysterectomy: a double-blind, placebo-

and sexual function after hysterectomy in women with preoperative pain and

transversus abdominis plane blockade: description of anatomy and clinical techni-


Hysterectomy: Advances in Perioperative Care 245

Levy BS, Luciano DE, Emery LL. Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy is safe for patients and

Lo Y, Chia YY, Liu K, Ko NH. Morphine sparing with droperidol in patient-controlled

Macintyre PE, Scott DA, Schug SA, Visser EJ, Walker SM. Acute pain management: scientific

Maranets I, Kain ZN. Preoperative anxiety and intraoperative anesthetic requirements.

Massicotte L, Chalaoui KD, Beaulieu D, Roy JD, Bissonnette F. Comparison of spinal

Mathiesen O, Rasmussen ML, Dierking G, Lech K, Hilsted KL, Fomsgaard JS, Lose G, Dahl

Moerman N, van Dam FS, Muller MJ, Oosting H. The Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and

Morley AP, Derrick J, Seed PT, Tan PE, Chung DC, Short TG. Isoflurane dosage for equi-

Murphy EJ. Acute pain management pharmacology for the patient with concurrent renal or

Møller C, Kehlet H, Friland SG, Schouenborg LO, Lund C, Ottesen B. Fast track hysterec-

Naik R, Jackson KS, Lopes A, Cross P, Henry JA. Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal

Niesters M, Dahan A, Kest B, Zacny J, Stijnen T, Aarts L, Sarton E. Do sex differences exist in

Niiyama Y, Kawamata T, Shimizu H, Omote K, Namiki A. The addition of epidural mor-

Oehler MK. Robotic surgery in gynaecology and gynaecologic oncology: program initiation

McDonnell J, Laffey J. Transversus abdominis plane block. *Anesth Analg* 2007; 105: 883 Meyhoff CS, Henneberg SW, Jørgensen BG, Gätke MR, Rasmussen LS. Depth of anaesthesia

information scale (APAIS). *Anesth Analg* 1996; 82: 445-51

without epidural blockade. *Anesth Analg* 2002; 95: 1412-8

hepatic disease. *Anaesth Intensive Care* 2005; 33: 311-22

tomy. *Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol* 2001; 98: 18-22

and clinical studies. *Pain* 2010; 151: 61-8

anesthesia with general anesthesia on morphine requirement after abdominal

JB. Pregabalin and dexamethasone in combination with paracetamol for postoperative pain control after abdominal hysterectomy. *Acta Anaesth Scand* 2009; 53: 227-35

monitoring in obese patients: a randomized study of propofol-remifentanil. *Acta* 

valent intraoperative electroencephalographic suppression in patients with and

hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy – a randomised phase II trial.

opioid analgeisa? A systematic review and meta-analysis of human experimental

phine to ropivacaine improves epidural analgesia after lower abdominal surgery.

and operative outcomes at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. *Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol*

dexmedetomidine and morphine for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. *Br J* 

reduces institutional cost. *J Minim Invasive Gynecol* 2005; 12: 494-501 Lin JG, Lo MW, Wen YR, Hsieh CL, Tsai SK, Sun WZ. The effect of high an low frequency electrpoacupuncture in pain after lower abdominal surgery. *Pain* 2002; 99: 509-14 Lin TF, Yeh YC, Lin FS, Wang YP, Lin CJ, Sun WZ, Fan SZ. Effect of combining

*Anaesth* 2009; 102: 117-22

analgesia. *J Clin Anesth* 2005; 17: 271-5

evidence (3rd edition), Melbourne 2010

hysterectomy. *Acta Anaesth Scand* 2009; 53: 641-7

*Anesth Analg* 1999; 89: 1346-51

*Anaesth Scand* 2009; 53: 369-75

*BJOG* 2010; 117: 746-51

*Can J Anaesth* 2005; 52: 181-5

2011; 51: 119-24


Kilickan L, Toker K. The effect of preemptive intravenous morphine on postoperative analgesia and surgical stress response. *Panminerva Med* 2001; 43: 171-5 Kim KS, Koo MS, Jeon JW, Park Hs, Seung IS. Capsicum plaster at the korean hand acu-

Kim KS, Nam YM. The analgesic effects of capsicum plaster at the Zusanli point after

Kim SH, Kang S, Kim YM, Kim BG, Seong SJ, Cha SD, Park CY, Yun YH. Prevalence and

Kim TJ, Lee YY, Cha HH, Kim CJ, Choi CH, Lee JW, Bae DS, Lee JH, Kim BG. Single-port-

Kim YH, Kim CW, Kim KS. Clinical observations on postoperative vomiting treated by

Kim YH, Kim KS, Lee HJ, Shim JC, Yoon SW. The efficacy of several neuromuscular

Kindler CH, Harms C, Amsler F, Ihde-Scholl T, Scheidegger D. The visual analog scale

Kocabas S, Karaman S, Uysallar E, Firat V. The use of tramadol and morphine for pain relief after abdominal hysterectomy. *Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol* 2005; 32: 45-8 Kolesnikov Y, Gabovits B, Levin A, Voiko E, Veske A. Combined catechol-O-methyltrans-

Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ. Transversus abdominis plane blocks for rescue analgesia after major

Kroon UB, Rådström M, Hjelthe C, Dahlin C, Kroon L. Fast-track hysterectomy: a randomised, controlled study. *Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol* 2010; 151: 203-7 Kvalsvik O, Borchgrevink PC, Hagen L, Dale O. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-

Lariviere WR, Wilson SG, Laughlin TM, Kokayeff A, West EE, Adhikari SM, Wan Y, Mogil

Lattermann R, Schricker T, Wachter U, Georgieff M, Schreiber M. Laparoscopic-assisted

Lenz H, Sandvik L, Qvigstad E, Bjerkelund CE, Ræder J. A comparison of intravenous

Lethaby A, Ivanova V, Johnson NP. Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynae-

analgesia and central side effects. *Anesth Analg* 2011; 112: 448-53

abdominal hysterectomy. *Acta Anaesthesiol Scand* 2003; 47: 451-6

assays of nociception and hypersensitivity. *Pain* 2002; 97: 75-86

after laparoscopic hysterectomy. *Anesth Analg* 2009; 109: 1279-83

cological conditions. *Cochrane Database Syst Rev* 2006; 2: CD004993

study. *Can J Anaesth* 2001; 48: 871-5

abdominal surgery. *Acta Anaesthesiol Scand* 2011; 55: 635-637

abdominal hysterectomy. *Anesth Analg* 2006; 103: 709-13

auricular acupuncture. *Am J Chin Med* 2003; 31: 475-80

and vomiting. *Anesth Analg* 2011; 112: 819-23

anesthetic concerns. *Anesth Analg* 2000; 90: 706-12

rectomy. *Anesth Analg* 2002; 95: 1103-7

*J Gynecol Cancer* 2010; 20: 1017-24

*Endosc* 2010; 24: 2248-52

puncture point reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting after abdominal hyste-

predictors of anxiety and depression among cervical cancer survivors in Korea. *Int* 

access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. *Surg* 

monitoring modes at the P6 acupuncture point in preventing postoperative nausea

allows effective measurement of preoperative anxiety and detection of patients'

ferase and mu-opioid receptor gene polymorphisms affect morphine postoperative

controlled study of the effect of rectal paracetamol on morphine consumption after

JS. Heritability of nociception. III. genetic relationships among commonly used

vaginal hysterectomy and the hyperglycemic response to surgery: an observational

oxycodone and intravenous morphine in patient-controlled postoperative analgesia


Hysterectomy: Advances in Perioperative Care 247

Sarmini OR, Lefholz K, Froeschke HP. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterec-

Sartain JB, Barry JJ, Richardson CA, Branagan HC. Effect of combining naloxone and morphine for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. *Anesthesiology* 2003; 99: 148-51 Sarton E, Romberg R, Dahan A. Gender differences in morphine pharmacokinetics and

Sen H, Sizlan A, Yanarates O, Emirkadi H, Ozkan S, Dagli G, Turan A. A comparison of

Serati M, Salvatore S, Uccella S, Laterza RM, Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Bolis P. Sexual function

Sharma JB, Wadhwa L, Malhotra M, Arora R. Mini laparotomy versus conventional

Sjöling M, Nordahl G, Olofsson N, Asplund K. The impact of preoperative information on

Sprung J, Sanders Ms, Warner ME, Gebhart JB, Stanhope CR, Jankowski CJ et al. Pain relief

Strang CM, Hachenberg T, Fredén F, Hedenstierna G. Development of atelectasis and

Tan EK, Cornish J, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP. Meta-analysis: alvimopan vs placebo in the treatment of post-operative ileus. *Aliment Pharmacol Ther* 2007; 25: 47-57 Teplin V, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, Learman LA, Richter HE, Kuppermann M. Oophorectomy in

Thangaswamy CR, Rewari V, Trikha A, Dehran M, Chandralekha. Dexamethasone before

Topcu I, Luleci N, Tekin S, Kefi A, Erincler T. Effectiveness of clonidine and fentanyl

Turan A, White PF, Karamanlioglu B, Memis D, Tasdogan M, Pamukcu Z, Yavuz E.

Vitale AT, O'Connor PC. The effect of Reiki on pain and anxiety in women with abdominal hysterectomies: a quasi-experimental pilot study. *Holist Nurs Pract* 2006; 263-72 Wang F, Shen X, Liu Y, Xu S, Guo X. Continuous infusion of butorphanol combined with

*Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther* 2005; 40: 521-5

management. *Anesth Analg* 2006; 102: 175-81

between laparoscopy and laparotomy? *J Sex Med* 2009; 6: 2516-22

dynamics. *Adv Exp Med Biol* 2003; 523: 71-80

12: 121-4

*Analg* 2009; 109: 1645-50

*Educ Couns* 2003; 51: 169-76

*J Anaesth* 2009; 103: 298-303

*Gynecol* 2007; 109: 347-54

*Anesth* 2010; 24: 24-30

anesthesia. *Can J Anaesth* 2006; 53: 690-700

2004; 58: 196-202

tomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes. *J Minim Invasive Gynecol* 2005;

gabapentin and ketamine in acute and chronic pain after hysterectomy. *Anesth* 

after radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: is there a difference

laparotomy for abdominal hysterectomy: a comparative study. *Indian J Med Sci*

state anxiety, postoperative pain and satisfaction with pain management. *Patient* 

and functional status after vaginal hysterectomy: intrathecal versus general

arterial to end-tidal PCO2-difference in a porcine model of pneumoperitoneum. *Br* 

premenopausal women: health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. *Obstet* 

total laparoscopic hyerectomy: a randomized controlled dose-response study. *J* 

addition to bupivacaine in postoperative patient controlled epidural analgesia.

Gabapentin: an alternative to the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors for perioperative pain

intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy a randomized, double-blind controlled trial. *Eur J Anaesth* 2009; 26: 28-34


Oriola F, Toque Y, Mary A, Gagneur O, Beloucif S, Dupont H. Bilateral ilioinguinal nerve

Ottesen M, Sørensen M, Rasmussen Y, Smidt-Jensen S, Kehlet H, Ottesen B. Fast track

Park HP, Hwang JW, Kim YB, Jeon YT, Park SH, Yun MJ, Do SH. Effect of pre-emptive

Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive

Perniola A, Gupta A, Crafoord K, Darvish B, Magnuson A, Axelsson K. Intraabdominal local

Persson P, Kjølhede P. Factors associated with postoperative recovery after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. *Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol* 2008; 140: 108-13 Petersen PL, Mathiesen O, Thorup H, Dahl JB. The transversus abdominis plane block: a

Piper SN, Triem JG, Röhm KD, Kranke P, Maleck WH, Boldt J. Prevention of post-operative

Pirim A, Karaman S, Uyar M. Addition of ketamine infusion to patient controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine after abdominal hysterectomy. *Agri* 2006; 18: 52-8 Rafi A. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. *Anesthesia* 2001; 56:

Ribeiro SC, Ribeiro RM, Santos NC, Pinotti JA. A randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. *Int J Gynaecol Obstet* 2003; 83: 37-43 Riddle DL, Wade JB, Jiranek WA, Kong X. Preoperative pain catastrophizing predicts pain outcome after knee arthroplasty. *Clin Orthop Relat Res* 2010; 468: 798-806 Rodriguez R, Martinez E, Santana M, Rodriguez Huertas E. Stress response under continu-

Roovers JP, van der Bom JG, van der Vaart CH, Heintz AP. Hysterectomy and sexual

oxycodone analgesic efficacy and safety. *Br J Pharmacol* 2010; 160: 919-30

hysterectomy – a randomised clinical trial. *BJOG* 2010; 117: 469-78

during laparoscopic hysterectomy. *Anaesth Intensive Care* 2009; 37: 593-7 Penketh R, Griffiths A, Chawathe S. A prospective observational study of the safety and

scopic gynecologic surgery. *Anesth Analg* 2007; 104: 731-4

vaginal surgery. *Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand* 2002; 81: 138-46

setting. *BJOG* 2007; 114: 430-6

*Scand* 2010; 54: 529-539

1024-26

factors. *Anesthesiology* 2000; 93: 1123-33

plus dexamethasone. *Anaesthesist* 2003; 52: 120-6

tomy. *Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim* 2007; 54: 221-6

block decreases morphine consumption in female patients undergoing nonlaparo-

alveolar recruitment strategy before pneumoperitoneum on arterial oxygenation

acceptability of vaginal hysterectomy performed in a 24-hour day case surgery

anesthetics for postoperative pain relief following abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized, double-blind, dose-finding study. *Eur J Anaesthesiol* 2009; 26: 421-9 Persson P, Brynhildsen J, Kjølhede P. Short-term recovery after subtotal and total abdominal

valuable option for post-operative analgesia? A topical review. *Acta Anaesthesiol* 

nausea and vomiting. Randomised comparison of dolasetron versus dolasetron

ous infusion of remifentanil compared to bolus doses of fentanyl assessed by levels of cytokines, C-reactive protein, and cortisol during and after abdominal hysterec-

wellbeing: prospective observational study of vaginal hysterectomy, subtotal abdominal hysterectomy, and total abdominal hysterectomy. *BMJ* 2003; 327: 774-8 Roumm AR, Pizzi L, Goldfarb NI, Cohn H. Minimally invasive: minimally reimbursed? An examination of six laparoscopic surgical procedures. *Surg Innov* 2005; 12: 261-87 Samer CF, Daali Y, Wagner M, Hopfgartner G, Eap CB et al. Genetic polymorphisms and

drug interactions modulating CYP2D6 and CYP3A activities have a major effect on


**Part 4** 

**Hysterectomy Post-Operative Care** 

