Stroke and Liver Cirrhosis: A Brief Review of Current Evidence

*Kexin Zheng, Xiaozhong Guo, Xinhong Wang and Xingshun Qi*

#### **Abstract**

Stroke and liver cirrhosis are common in our everyday clinical practice, both of which can lead to serious complications. Their association is unclear. In this chapter, we briefly summarized the epidemiology of liver cirrhosis in stroke, reviewed the current evidence regarding the association between liver cirrhosis and stroke, and discussed the potential mechanisms for explaining such an association, such as coagulopathy, hypoperfusion, cardiac diseases, diabetes, and dyslipidemia.

**Keywords:** liver cirrhosis, stroke, review, mechanisms, epidemiology

#### **1. Introduction**

Stroke and liver cirrhosis are two leading causes of death worldwide [1]. Patients with liver cirrhosis often have coagulopathy, hypoperfusion, cardiac diseases, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, which are associated with the development of stroke. Recent evidence also suggests a higher risk of stroke in liver cirrhosis. In the present chapter, we reviewed the current evidence regarding epidemiology of stroke in liver cirrhosis, association of stroke with liver cirrhosis, and their potential mechanisms.

#### **2. Stroke**

Stroke is the second leading cause of death and disability worldwide, which is defined as an acute episode of focal dysfunction of the brain, retina, or spinal cord [2]. It is often divided into hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. Hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke leads to 2978 and 3348 thousands people dying until 2015, respectively [1]. Over two thirds of stroke-related deaths occur in developing countries in the world [3], especially in low-income and middle-income countries [4]. Burden of stroke in Asia is heavier than Europe or North America [5]. Patients with stroke are more susceptible to suffer systemic complications, including cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, musculoskeletal, and neuropsychiatric systems, venous thromboembolism, and so on [6, 7]. Prognosis of stroke is poor. About 20–30% of patients died 6 months after stroke, 20–30% had moderate to severe disability, and 20–25% had mild to moderate disability [8]. Traditional risk factors of stroke are hypertension, decreased physical activity, increased ratio of lipoprotein (Apo)B/ApoA1 and waist-to-hip, unhealthy diet, depression status, smoking, cardiac disease, alcohol intake, and diabetes mellitus [4, 9]. Additionally, our clinical practice suggested that acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding would lead to stroke [10]. Several possible explanations are as follows. First, massive blood loss

leads to reduced blood supply to the brain secondary to cerebral vessel vasoconstriction. Second, massive blood loss sometimes leads to reactive thrombocytosis [11], thereby resulting in potential hypercoagulability. Third, hemocoagulase is occasionally employed for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding, which could reduce fibrinogen concentration [12]. Fourth, blood transfusion is an important treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding [13], but the ischemia reperfusion injury of brain cannot be ignored.

## **3. Liver cirrhosis**

Liver cirrhosis is an end stage of liver disease [14]. Histologically, it is characterized by diffuse fibrosis within hepatic tissue, false lobular formation, and regenerative nodules [14, 15]. It is the 17th cause of death globally [16], and the mortality has increased steadily over the past 30 years, especially in Central Asia, North Africa, and the Middle East [17]. The major causes of liver cirrhosis are chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, alcoholism, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), drug abuse, and cholestasis [18–20]. The major complications are variceal hemorrhage [21], ascites [22], cirrhotic cardiomyopathy [23], hepatic encephalopathy [24], hepatocellular carcinoma [25, 26], portal vein thrombosis [27], and other common venous thromboembolism [28]. Up-to-date concept suggests a tendency towards both bleeding and thrombotic events in cirrhotic patients due to decreased levels of both procoagulant and anticoagulant factors [29, 30].

## **4. Association between stroke and liver cirrhosis**

Overall, it remains unclear about whether liver cirrhosis increases or reduces the risk of ischemic stroke. A majority of studies [31–35] indicated an obviously higher risk of overall, ischemic, and/or hemorrhagic stroke after adjusting the covariates in cirrhotic patients than non-cirrhotic patients. By contrast, another two studies by Chen [36] and Solaymani-Dodaran [37] suggested the protective role of liver cirrhosis in the development of ischemic stroke. Heterogeneous results regarding this association among the studies might be attributed to the selection of patients. The characteristics of study population were different. Studies by Chen and Solaymani-Dodaran et al. focused on patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis and primary biliary

**51**

**Figure 3.**

*The prevalence of stroke in liver cirrhosis.*

reported.

**Figure 2.**

(**Figure 5**).

*Stroke and Liver Cirrhosis: A Brief Review of Current Evidence*

**5. Incidence/prevalence of stroke in liver cirrhosis**

unclassified cirrhotic patients without atrial fibrillation.

to 34.33% [34–36, 50–56] (**Figure 4**).

cirrhosis, respectively. By comparison, the study population had unspecified liver cirrhosis in other studies. The association between liver cirrhosis and stroke was outlined according to the evidence from abovementioned studies (**Figures 1** and **2**).

Regardless of the type of stroke, the prevalence of stroke was from 2.06 to 53.81% [36–49] (**Figure 3**). Several subgroup populations should be further

The prevalence of ischemic stroke was from 0.85 to 6.55% [34, 36, 57, 58]

First, the prevalence of hemorrhagic stroke in liver cirrhosis seemed to be higher than that of ischemic stroke. The prevalence of hemorrhagic stroke was from 0.80

Second, the annual incidence of ischemic stroke in cirrhotic patients with atrial fibrillation was 1.2% [59]. The prevalence of stroke in cirrhotic patients with atrial fibrillation was 53.81 and 34.58% in the studies by Kuo [38] and Lee [44], respectively. This figure is significantly higher than that reported by studies including

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90420*

*The association between liver cirrhosis and ischemic stroke.*

**Figure 1.** *The association between liver cirrhosis and hemorrhagic stroke.* *Liver Pathology*

cannot be ignored.

**3. Liver cirrhosis**

leads to reduced blood supply to the brain secondary to cerebral vessel vasoconstriction. Second, massive blood loss sometimes leads to reactive thrombocytosis [11], thereby resulting in potential hypercoagulability. Third, hemocoagulase is occasionally employed for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding, which could reduce fibrinogen concentration [12]. Fourth, blood transfusion is an important treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding [13], but the ischemia reperfusion injury of brain

Liver cirrhosis is an end stage of liver disease [14]. Histologically, it is characterized by diffuse fibrosis within hepatic tissue, false lobular formation, and regenerative nodules [14, 15]. It is the 17th cause of death globally [16], and the mortality has increased steadily over the past 30 years, especially in Central Asia, North Africa, and the Middle East [17]. The major causes of liver cirrhosis are chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, alcoholism, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), drug abuse, and cholestasis [18–20]. The major complications are variceal hemorrhage [21], ascites [22], cirrhotic cardiomyopathy [23], hepatic encephalopathy [24], hepatocellular carcinoma [25, 26], portal vein thrombosis [27], and other common venous thromboembolism [28]. Up-to-date concept suggests a tendency towards both bleeding and thrombotic events in cirrhotic patients due to decreased levels of both procoagulant and anticoagulant factors [29, 30].

Overall, it remains unclear about whether liver cirrhosis increases or reduces the risk of ischemic stroke. A majority of studies [31–35] indicated an obviously higher risk of overall, ischemic, and/or hemorrhagic stroke after adjusting the covariates in cirrhotic patients than non-cirrhotic patients. By contrast, another two studies by Chen [36] and Solaymani-Dodaran [37] suggested the protective role of liver cirrhosis in the development of ischemic stroke. Heterogeneous results regarding this association among the studies might be attributed to the selection of patients. The characteristics of study population were different. Studies by Chen and Solaymani-Dodaran et al. focused on patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis and primary biliary

**50**

**Figure 1.**

*The association between liver cirrhosis and hemorrhagic stroke.*

**4. Association between stroke and liver cirrhosis**

**Figure 2.** *The association between liver cirrhosis and ischemic stroke.*

cirrhosis, respectively. By comparison, the study population had unspecified liver cirrhosis in other studies. The association between liver cirrhosis and stroke was outlined according to the evidence from abovementioned studies (**Figures 1** and **2**).

## **5. Incidence/prevalence of stroke in liver cirrhosis**

Regardless of the type of stroke, the prevalence of stroke was from 2.06 to 53.81% [36–49] (**Figure 3**). Several subgroup populations should be further reported.

First, the prevalence of hemorrhagic stroke in liver cirrhosis seemed to be higher than that of ischemic stroke. The prevalence of hemorrhagic stroke was from 0.80 to 34.33% [34–36, 50–56] (**Figure 4**).

```
The prevalence of ischemic stroke was from 0.85 to 6.55% [34, 36, 57, 58] 
(Figure 5).
```
Second, the annual incidence of ischemic stroke in cirrhotic patients with atrial fibrillation was 1.2% [59]. The prevalence of stroke in cirrhotic patients with atrial fibrillation was 53.81 and 34.58% in the studies by Kuo [38] and Lee [44], respectively. This figure is significantly higher than that reported by studies including unclassified cirrhotic patients without atrial fibrillation.

**Figure 3.** *The prevalence of stroke in liver cirrhosis.*

**Figure 4.** *The prevalence of hemorrhagic stroke in liver cirrhosis.*

**Figure 5.**

*The prevalence of ischemic stroke in liver cirrhosis.*

Third, the annual incidence of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in cirrhotic patients was 0.11% [31].

#### **6. Potential mechanisms for the association between stroke and liver cirrhosis**

There are several potential mechanisms for explaining the association between stroke and liver cirrhosis.

#### **6.1 Coagulopathy**

Coagulation and anticoagulation factors maintain a dynamic balance to prevent from the development of thrombosis and hemorrhage in healthy population [60]. By comparison, coagulopathy is frequently observed in cirrhotic patients [61] due to an imbalance between coagulation and anticoagulation factors [62]. First, clotting factors are often decreased in cirrhotic patients [63] and in parallel to the

**53**

*Stroke and Liver Cirrhosis: A Brief Review of Current Evidence*

progression of liver disease [64]. Second, the mean lifetime of platelet is shortened and thrombopoietin production is decreased [65]. Thrombocytopenia is also caused by hypersplenism, antiplatelet autoantibodies, toxic effects of excessive alcohol intake, and treatment with interferon [65, 66]. Third, a hypercoagulable status has been recognized in advanced cirrhosis due to increased levels of factor VIII and decreased levels of protein C [64]. Therefore, both hemorrhage and thrombosis can

Hypoperfusion is often observed in liver cirrhosis. First, ascites is a common clinical sign in cirrhotic patients due to liver dysfunction and portal hypertension [67], in which lots of capillary fluids leak into abdominal cavity. Second, serum albumin level is often decreased in liver cirrhosis, which can decrease intravascular osmotic pressure [68]. Third, massive gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to gastroesophageal variceal rupture is a common complication of liver cirrhosis, leading to the hypoperfusion of various organs [21]. Fourth, there is a hyperdynamic circulation status in cirrhotic patients, which is characterized by arterial hypotension, high

Cirrhotic patients often present with cirrhotic cardiomyopathy defined as cardiac systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction in the absence of previous history of heart disease [23]. Additionally, cardiac arrhythmias, especially atrial fibrillation, have been increasingly recognized in patients with chronic liver diseases [71, 72]. A nationwide population-based study suggests an increased risk of atrial fibrillation

Up to 70% of cirrhotic patients develop diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance [74]. Evidence also suggests an association of hepatogeneous diabetes with higher portal pressure and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic encephalopathy, and mortality in cirrhosis [75]. Several potential mechanisms of hepatogeneous diabetes include [1] reduced insulin clearance and hyperinsulinemia [76], [2] beta cell failure and reduced insulin secretion [77], and [3] increased secretion from

Liver plays a key role in the synthesis, decomposition, and digestion of lipids, and dyslipidemia is found in patients with impaired liver function. Triglycerides, the ratio of triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein, and the ratio of apolipoprotein

Patients with liver cirrhosis might have an increased risk of stroke probably due to their concomitant high-risk factors, such as coagulopathy, hypoperfusion, cardiac diseases, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Once a patient was diagnosed with

B to apolipoprotein A1 increase in cirrhotic patients [78, 79].

liver cirrhosis, the management of stroke should be initiated.

cardiac output, and low peripheral vascular resistance [69, 70].

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90420*

develop in cirrhotic patients.

**6.2 Hypoperfusion**

**6.3 Cardiac diseases**

**6.4 Diabetes**

**6.5 Dyslipidemia**

**7. Conclusions**

development in cirrhosis [73].

alpha cells and hyperglucagonemia [75].

progression of liver disease [64]. Second, the mean lifetime of platelet is shortened and thrombopoietin production is decreased [65]. Thrombocytopenia is also caused by hypersplenism, antiplatelet autoantibodies, toxic effects of excessive alcohol intake, and treatment with interferon [65, 66]. Third, a hypercoagulable status has been recognized in advanced cirrhosis due to increased levels of factor VIII and decreased levels of protein C [64]. Therefore, both hemorrhage and thrombosis can develop in cirrhotic patients.

#### **6.2 Hypoperfusion**

*Liver Pathology*

**52**

**Figure 5.**

**Figure 4.**

**cirrhosis**

**6.1 Coagulopathy**

stroke and liver cirrhosis.

*The prevalence of ischemic stroke in liver cirrhosis.*

*The prevalence of hemorrhagic stroke in liver cirrhosis.*

cirrhotic patients was 0.11% [31].

Third, the annual incidence of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in

There are several potential mechanisms for explaining the association between

Coagulation and anticoagulation factors maintain a dynamic balance to prevent from the development of thrombosis and hemorrhage in healthy population [60]. By comparison, coagulopathy is frequently observed in cirrhotic patients [61] due to an imbalance between coagulation and anticoagulation factors [62]. First, clotting factors are often decreased in cirrhotic patients [63] and in parallel to the

**6. Potential mechanisms for the association between stroke and liver** 

Hypoperfusion is often observed in liver cirrhosis. First, ascites is a common clinical sign in cirrhotic patients due to liver dysfunction and portal hypertension [67], in which lots of capillary fluids leak into abdominal cavity. Second, serum albumin level is often decreased in liver cirrhosis, which can decrease intravascular osmotic pressure [68]. Third, massive gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to gastroesophageal variceal rupture is a common complication of liver cirrhosis, leading to the hypoperfusion of various organs [21]. Fourth, there is a hyperdynamic circulation status in cirrhotic patients, which is characterized by arterial hypotension, high cardiac output, and low peripheral vascular resistance [69, 70].

#### **6.3 Cardiac diseases**

Cirrhotic patients often present with cirrhotic cardiomyopathy defined as cardiac systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction in the absence of previous history of heart disease [23]. Additionally, cardiac arrhythmias, especially atrial fibrillation, have been increasingly recognized in patients with chronic liver diseases [71, 72]. A nationwide population-based study suggests an increased risk of atrial fibrillation development in cirrhosis [73].

#### **6.4 Diabetes**

Up to 70% of cirrhotic patients develop diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance [74]. Evidence also suggests an association of hepatogeneous diabetes with higher portal pressure and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic encephalopathy, and mortality in cirrhosis [75]. Several potential mechanisms of hepatogeneous diabetes include [1] reduced insulin clearance and hyperinsulinemia [76], [2] beta cell failure and reduced insulin secretion [77], and [3] increased secretion from alpha cells and hyperglucagonemia [75].

#### **6.5 Dyslipidemia**

Liver plays a key role in the synthesis, decomposition, and digestion of lipids, and dyslipidemia is found in patients with impaired liver function. Triglycerides, the ratio of triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein, and the ratio of apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein A1 increase in cirrhotic patients [78, 79].

#### **7. Conclusions**

Patients with liver cirrhosis might have an increased risk of stroke probably due to their concomitant high-risk factors, such as coagulopathy, hypoperfusion, cardiac diseases, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Once a patient was diagnosed with liver cirrhosis, the management of stroke should be initiated.

## **Abbreviations**


## **Author contributions**

Kexin Zheng: reviewed the literature and drafted the manuscript. Xiaozhong Guo, Xinhong Wang: gave critical comments. Xingshun Qi: conceived the work and drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors have made an intellectual contribution to the manuscript and approved the submission.

## **Author details**

Kexin Zheng1,2, Xiaozhong Guo1 \*, Xinhong Wang3 and Xingshun Qi1 \*

1 Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area), Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China

2 Postgraduate College, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, China

3 Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area), Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China

\*Address all correspondence to: xingshunqi@126.com and guo\_xiao\_zhong@126.com

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**55**

*Stroke and Liver Cirrhosis: A Brief Review of Current Evidence*

et al. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): A case-control study. Lancet.

[10] Qi X, Qiu J, De Stefano V, Shao X, Sun R, Guo X. Development of acute ischemic stroke in two patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. AME Medical Journal. 2017;**2**:24

[11] Qi X, De Stefano V, Shao X, Guo X. Thrombocytosis in a patient with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Intractable & Rare Diseases Research.

[12] Qi X, Wang J, Yu X, De Stefano V, Li H, Wu C, et al. Hemocoagulase might not control but worsen gastrointestinal bleeding in an elderly patient with type II respiratory failure. Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

[13] Nelamangala-Ramakrishnaiah VP, Chellappa V, Goneppanavar M. Blood transfusion strategy in cirrhotic patients with active upper GI bleeding. AME Medical Journal. 2019;**4**:1. Available from: http://amj.amegroups.com/

Burroughs AK. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet.

[16] Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010.

[17] Mokdad AA, Lopez AD, Shahraz S, Lozano R, Mokdad AH, Stanaway J,

[15] Schuppan D, Afdhal NH. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2008;**371**:838-851

article/view/4768/html

2014;**383**:1749-1761

[14] Tsochatzis EA, Bosch J,

Lancet. 2012;**380**:2095-2128

2010;**376**:112-123

2017;**6**:69-71

2017;**2**:71

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90420*

[1] GBD. 2015 mortality and causes of death collaborators. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet.

[2] Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJ, Culebras A, et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/ American Stroke Association. Stroke.

[3] Freedman B, Potpara TS, Lip GY. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Rangarajan S, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, et al. Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): A casecontrol study. Lancet. 2016;**388**:761-775

[5] Kim JS. Stroke in Asia: A global disaster. International Journal of Stroke.

[6] Kumar S, Selim MH, Caplan LR. Medical complications after stroke. Lancet Neurology. 2010;**9**:105-118

[7] Hackett ML, Kohler S, O'Brien JT, Mead GE. Neuropsychiatric outcomes

of stroke. Lancet Neurology.

Medicine. 1975;**293**:954-956

[9] O'Donnell MJ, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, Chin SL, Rao-Melacini P,

[8] Gresham GE, Fitzpatrick TE, Wolf PA, McNamara PM, Kannel WB, Dawber TR. Residual disability in survivors of stroke—the Framingham study. The New England Journal of

2014;**9**:856-857

2014;**13**:525-534

**References**

2016;**388**:1459-1544

2013;**44**:2064-2089

Lancet. 2016;**388**:806-817

[4] O'Donnell MJ, Chin SL,

*Stroke and Liver Cirrhosis: A Brief Review of Current Evidence DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90420*

#### **References**

*Liver Pathology*

**Abbreviations**

Apo apolipoprotein HBV hepatitis B virus HCV hepatitis C virus

**Author contributions**

**Author details**

China

Province, China

Kexin Zheng1,2, Xiaozhong Guo1

Liaoning Province, China

and guo\_xiao\_zhong@126.com

provided the original work is properly cited.

NASH nonalcoholic steatohepatitis SAH subarachnoid hemorrhage

tion to the manuscript and approved the submission.

Kexin Zheng: reviewed the literature and drafted the manuscript. Xiaozhong Guo, Xinhong Wang: gave critical comments. Xingshun Qi: conceived the work and drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors have made an intellectual contribu-

\*, Xinhong Wang3

2 Postgraduate College, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province,

3 Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area), Shenyang, Liaoning

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,

\*Address all correspondence to: xingshunqi@126.com

1 Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area), Shenyang,

and Xingshun Qi1

\*

**54**

[1] GBD. 2015 mortality and causes of death collaborators. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 2016;**388**:1459-1544

[2] Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJ, Culebras A, et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/ American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;**44**:2064-2089

[3] Freedman B, Potpara TS, Lip GY. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Lancet. 2016;**388**:806-817

[4] O'Donnell MJ, Chin SL, Rangarajan S, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, et al. Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): A casecontrol study. Lancet. 2016;**388**:761-775

[5] Kim JS. Stroke in Asia: A global disaster. International Journal of Stroke. 2014;**9**:856-857

[6] Kumar S, Selim MH, Caplan LR. Medical complications after stroke. Lancet Neurology. 2010;**9**:105-118

[7] Hackett ML, Kohler S, O'Brien JT, Mead GE. Neuropsychiatric outcomes of stroke. Lancet Neurology. 2014;**13**:525-534

[8] Gresham GE, Fitzpatrick TE, Wolf PA, McNamara PM, Kannel WB, Dawber TR. Residual disability in survivors of stroke—the Framingham study. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1975;**293**:954-956

[9] O'Donnell MJ, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, Chin SL, Rao-Melacini P, et al. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): A case-control study. Lancet. 2010;**376**:112-123

[10] Qi X, Qiu J, De Stefano V, Shao X, Sun R, Guo X. Development of acute ischemic stroke in two patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. AME Medical Journal. 2017;**2**:24

[11] Qi X, De Stefano V, Shao X, Guo X. Thrombocytosis in a patient with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Intractable & Rare Diseases Research. 2017;**6**:69-71

[12] Qi X, Wang J, Yu X, De Stefano V, Li H, Wu C, et al. Hemocoagulase might not control but worsen gastrointestinal bleeding in an elderly patient with type II respiratory failure. Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2017;**2**:71

[13] Nelamangala-Ramakrishnaiah VP, Chellappa V, Goneppanavar M. Blood transfusion strategy in cirrhotic patients with active upper GI bleeding. AME Medical Journal. 2019;**4**:1. Available from: http://amj.amegroups.com/ article/view/4768/html

[14] Tsochatzis EA, Bosch J, Burroughs AK. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2014;**383**:1749-1761

[15] Schuppan D, Afdhal NH. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2008;**371**:838-851

[16] Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;**380**:2095-2128

[17] Mokdad AA, Lopez AD, Shahraz S, Lozano R, Mokdad AH, Stanaway J,

et al. Liver cirrhosis mortality in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: A systematic analysis. BMC Medicine. 2014;**12**:145

[18] Ge PS, Runyon BA. Treatment of patients with cirrhosis. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;**375**:767-777

[19] Selmi C, Bowlus CL, Gershwin ME, Coppel RL. Primary biliary cirrhosis. Lancet. 2011;**377**:1600-1609

[20] Henriksen JH, Fuglsang S, Bendtsen F, Moller S. Arterial hypertension in cirrhosis: Arterial compliance, volume distribution, and central haemodynamics. Gut. 2006;**55**:380-387

[21] Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J. Management of varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;**362**:823-832

[22] Gines P, Cardenas A, Arroyo V, Rodes J. Management of cirrhosis and ascites. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;**350**:1646-1654

[23] Moller S, Henriksen JH. Cardiovascular complications of cirrhosis. Gut. 2008;**57**:268-278

[24] Shawcross D, Jalan R. Dispelling myths in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. Lancet. 2005;**365**:431-433

[25] Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2018;**391**:1301-1314

[26] Maluccio M, Covey A. Recent progress in understanding, diagnosing, and treating hepatocellular carcinoma. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2012;**62**:394-399

[27] Qi X, Han G, Fan D. Management of portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2014;**11**:435-446

[28] Qi X, Ren W, Guo X, Fan D. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in patients with liver diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2015;**10**:205-217

[29] Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J. Varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis: A new view of an old problem. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2015;**13**:2109-2117

[30] Sogaard KK, Horvath-Puho E, Gronbaek H, Jepsen P, Vilstrup H, Sorensen HT. Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with liver disease: A nationwide population-based case-control study. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2009;**104**:96-101

[31] Parikh NS, Merkler AE, Jesudian A, Kamel H. Liver cirrhosis is associated with an increased risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2018;**49**:ATP171

[32] Wu HY, Lin CS, Yeh CC, Hu CJ, Shih CC, Cherng YG, et al. Cirrhosis patients' stroke risks and adverse outcomes: Two nationwide studies. Atherosclerosis. 2017;**263**:29-35

[33] Parikh NS, Navi BB, Schneider Y, Jesudian A, Kamel H. Association between cirrhosis and stroke in a nationally representative cohort. JAMA Neurology. 2017;**74**:927-932

[34] Lai CH, Cheng PY, Chen YY. Liver cirrhosis and risk of intracerebral hemorrhage: A 9-year follow-up study. Stroke. 2011;**42**:2615-2617

[35] Gronbaek H, Johnsen SP, Jepsen P, Gislum M, Vilstrup H, Tage-Jensen U, et al. Liver cirrhosis, other liver diseases, and risk of hospitalisation for intracerebral haemorrhage: A Danish population-based case-control study. BMC Gastroenterology. 2008;**8**:16

**57**

*Stroke and Liver Cirrhosis: A Brief Review of Current Evidence*

[43] Piazza NA, Singal AK. Frequency of cardiovascular events and effect on survival in liver transplant

recipients for cirrhosis due to alcoholic or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Experimental and Clinical Transplantation. 2016;**14**:79-85

[44] Lee SJ, Uhm JS, Kim JY, Pak HN, Lee MH, Joung B. The safety and efficacy of vitamin K antagonist in patients with atrial fibrillation and liver cirrhosis. International Journal of

[45] Mahadeva S, Kadhim O. Morbidity and mortality differences between cryptogenic and non-cryptogenic cirrhosis: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2014;**29**:189-190

Cardiology. 2015;**180**:185-191

[46] Jordan C, Pilch N, Taber D,

Transplantation. 2013;**13**:72

Meadows H, Fleming J, Mardis A, et al. Liver transplant for NASH: We need to spare the nephron. American Journal of

[47] Vanwagner LB, Bhave M, Te HS, Feinglass J, Alvarez L, Rinella ME. Patients transplanted for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis are at increased risk for postoperative cardiovascular events. Hepatology. 2012;**56**:1741-1750

[48] Gastaca M, Agüero F, Montejo M, Rimola A, Miralles P, Lozano R, et al. Retransplantation in HIV-infected patients after liver transplantation: A prospective cohort study. American Journal of Transplantation. 2011;**11**:277

[49] Josefsson A, Fu M, Bjornsson E, Olausson M, Kalaitzakis E. The use of beta-blockers in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation. Gastroenterology.

[50] Hum J, Shatzel JJ, Jou JH, Deloughery TG. The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants vs traditional anticoagulants in cirrhosis.

2010;**138**:S821

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90420*

[36] Chen YH, Chen KY, Lin HC. Nonalcoholic cirrhosis and the risk of stroke: A 5-year follow-up study. Liver

[37] Solaymani-Dodaran M, Aithal GP, Card T, West J. Risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in primary biliary cirrhosis: A population-based cohort study. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2008;**103**:2784-2788

[38] Kuo L, Chao TF, Liu CJ, Lin YJ, Chang SL, Lo LW, et al. Liver cirrhosis in patients with atrial fibrillation: Would oral anticoagulation have a net clinical benefit for stroke prevention? Journal of the American Heart Association.

[39] Chung MS, Kim HS, Lim YS, Jeon SB, Kim SO, Kim HJ, et al. Clinical impact of preoperative brain MR angiography and MR imaging in candidates for liver transplantation: A propensity score-matching study in a single institution. European Radiology.

[40] Chu LM, Liu CC, Yeh CC, Chang YC, Hu CJ, Shih CC, et al. Increased diabetes risk and

interaction with social and medical events in patients upon stroke: Two nationwide studies. Atherosclerosis.

[41] VanWagner LB, Serper M, Kang R, Levitsky J, Hohmann S, Abecassis M, et al. Factors associated with major adverse cardiovascular events after liver transplantation among a

national sample. American Journal of Transplantation. 2016;**16**:2684-2694

Montorfano M, Tanaka A, Jabbour R, Chieffo A, et al. Acute and mediumterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with cirrhosis. Giornale Italiano di

[42] Regazzoli D, Latib A,

Cardiologia. 2016;**17**:e14

2017;**6**:e005307

2017;**27**:3532-3541

2017;**265**:87-92

International. 2011;**31**:354-360

*Stroke and Liver Cirrhosis: A Brief Review of Current Evidence DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90420*

[36] Chen YH, Chen KY, Lin HC. Nonalcoholic cirrhosis and the risk of stroke: A 5-year follow-up study. Liver International. 2011;**31**:354-360

*Liver Pathology*

2014;**12**:145

2016;**375**:767-777

2006;**55**:380-387

et al. Liver cirrhosis mortality in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: A systematic analysis. BMC Medicine.

[28] Qi X, Ren W, Guo X, Fan D. Epidemiology of venous

Medicine. 2015;**10**:205-217

2015;**13**:2109-2117

2018;**49**:ATP171

[33] Parikh NS, Navi BB,

cohort. JAMA Neurology.

Stroke. 2011;**42**:2615-2617

and risk of hospitalisation for

2017;**74**:927-932

thromboembolism in patients with liver diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Internal and Emergency

[29] Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J. Varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis: A new view of an old problem. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

[30] Sogaard KK, Horvath-Puho E, Gronbaek H, Jepsen P, Vilstrup H, Sorensen HT. Risk of venous

thromboembolism in patients with liver disease: A nationwide population-based case-control study. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2009;**104**:96-101

[31] Parikh NS, Merkler AE, Jesudian A, Kamel H. Liver cirrhosis is associated with an increased risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke.

[32] Wu HY, Lin CS, Yeh CC, Hu CJ, Shih CC, Cherng YG, et al. Cirrhosis patients' stroke risks and adverse outcomes: Two nationwide studies. Atherosclerosis. 2017;**263**:29-35

Schneider Y, Jesudian A, Kamel H. Association between cirrhosis and stroke in a nationally representative

[34] Lai CH, Cheng PY, Chen YY. Liver cirrhosis and risk of intracerebral hemorrhage: A 9-year follow-up study.

[35] Gronbaek H, Johnsen SP, Jepsen P, Gislum M, Vilstrup H, Tage-Jensen U, et al. Liver cirrhosis, other liver diseases,

intracerebral haemorrhage: A Danish population-based case-control study. BMC Gastroenterology. 2008;**8**:16

[18] Ge PS, Runyon BA. Treatment of patients with cirrhosis. The New England Journal of Medicine.

[19] Selmi C, Bowlus CL, Gershwin ME, Coppel RL. Primary biliary cirrhosis.

[21] Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J. Management of varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. The New England Journal of

Lancet. 2011;**377**:1600-1609

Medicine. 2010;**362**:823-832

[23] Moller S, Henriksen JH. Cardiovascular complications of cirrhosis. Gut. 2008;**57**:268-278

myths in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. Lancet.

[25] Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet.

[26] Maluccio M, Covey A. Recent progress in understanding, diagnosing, and treating hepatocellular carcinoma. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.

Hepatology. 2014;**11**:435-446

[27] Qi X, Han G, Fan D. Management of portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology &

2005;**365**:431-433

2018;**391**:1301-1314

2012;**62**:394-399

[22] Gines P, Cardenas A, Arroyo V, Rodes J. Management of cirrhosis and ascites. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;**350**:1646-1654

[24] Shawcross D, Jalan R. Dispelling

[20] Henriksen JH, Fuglsang S, Bendtsen F, Moller S. Arterial hypertension in cirrhosis: Arterial compliance, volume distribution, and central haemodynamics. Gut.

**56**

[37] Solaymani-Dodaran M, Aithal GP, Card T, West J. Risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in primary biliary cirrhosis: A population-based cohort study. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2008;**103**:2784-2788

[38] Kuo L, Chao TF, Liu CJ, Lin YJ, Chang SL, Lo LW, et al. Liver cirrhosis in patients with atrial fibrillation: Would oral anticoagulation have a net clinical benefit for stroke prevention? Journal of the American Heart Association. 2017;**6**:e005307

[39] Chung MS, Kim HS, Lim YS, Jeon SB, Kim SO, Kim HJ, et al. Clinical impact of preoperative brain MR angiography and MR imaging in candidates for liver transplantation: A propensity score-matching study in a single institution. European Radiology. 2017;**27**:3532-3541

[40] Chu LM, Liu CC, Yeh CC, Chang YC, Hu CJ, Shih CC, et al. Increased diabetes risk and interaction with social and medical events in patients upon stroke: Two nationwide studies. Atherosclerosis. 2017;**265**:87-92

[41] VanWagner LB, Serper M, Kang R, Levitsky J, Hohmann S, Abecassis M, et al. Factors associated with major adverse cardiovascular events after liver transplantation among a national sample. American Journal of Transplantation. 2016;**16**:2684-2694

[42] Regazzoli D, Latib A, Montorfano M, Tanaka A, Jabbour R, Chieffo A, et al. Acute and mediumterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with cirrhosis. Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia. 2016;**17**:e14

[43] Piazza NA, Singal AK. Frequency of cardiovascular events and effect on survival in liver transplant recipients for cirrhosis due to alcoholic or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Experimental and Clinical Transplantation. 2016;**14**:79-85

[44] Lee SJ, Uhm JS, Kim JY, Pak HN, Lee MH, Joung B. The safety and efficacy of vitamin K antagonist in patients with atrial fibrillation and liver cirrhosis. International Journal of Cardiology. 2015;**180**:185-191

[45] Mahadeva S, Kadhim O. Morbidity and mortality differences between cryptogenic and non-cryptogenic cirrhosis: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2014;**29**:189-190

[46] Jordan C, Pilch N, Taber D, Meadows H, Fleming J, Mardis A, et al. Liver transplant for NASH: We need to spare the nephron. American Journal of Transplantation. 2013;**13**:72

[47] Vanwagner LB, Bhave M, Te HS, Feinglass J, Alvarez L, Rinella ME. Patients transplanted for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis are at increased risk for postoperative cardiovascular events. Hepatology. 2012;**56**:1741-1750

[48] Gastaca M, Agüero F, Montejo M, Rimola A, Miralles P, Lozano R, et al. Retransplantation in HIV-infected patients after liver transplantation: A prospective cohort study. American Journal of Transplantation. 2011;**11**:277

[49] Josefsson A, Fu M, Bjornsson E, Olausson M, Kalaitzakis E. The use of beta-blockers in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2010;**138**:S821

[50] Hum J, Shatzel JJ, Jou JH, Deloughery TG. The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants vs traditional anticoagulants in cirrhosis. European Journal of Haematology. 2017;**98**:393-397

[51] Cho J, Choi SM, Yu SJ, Park YS, Lee CH, Lee SM, et al. Bleeding complications in critically ill patients with liver cirrhosis. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine. 2016;**31**:288-295

[52] Hung TH, Hsieh YH, Tseng KC, Tseng CW, Lee HF, Tsai CC, et al. High mortality in cirrhotic patients following hemorrhagic stroke. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2015;**22**:995-997

[53] Bhandari BM, Kumar S, Latimer DC, Sass DA, Rothstein K. A head CT is unnecessary in the initial evaluation of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2011;**140**:S903

[54] Huang HH, Lin HH, Shih YL, Chen PJ, Chang WK, Chu HC, et al. Spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2008;**110**:253-258

[55] Johnsen SP, Pedersen L, Friis S, Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, Olsen Jø H, et al. Nonaspirin nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and risk of hospitalization for intracerebral hemorrhage: A population-based casecontrol study. Stroke. 2003;**34**:387-391

[56] Francis RB Jr, Feinstein DI. Clinical significance of accelerated fibrinolysis in liver disease. Haemostasis. 1984;**14**:460-465

[57] Zhang X, Qi X, Yoshida E, Méndez-Sánchez N, Hou F, Deng H, et al. Ischemic stroke in liver cirrhosis: Epidemiology, risk factors, and in-hospital outcomes. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2018;**30**:233-240

[58] Berzigotti A, Bonfiglioli A, Muscari A, Bianchi G, Libassi S, Bernardi M, et al. Reduced prevalence of ischemic events and abnormal supraortic flow patterns in patients with liver cirrhosis. Liver International. 2005;**25**(2):331-336

[59] Choi J, Kim J, Shim JH, Kim M, Nam GB. Risks versus benefits of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in cirrhotic patients. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology. 2017;**70**:255-262

[60] Jairath V, Burroughs A. Anticoagulation in patients with liver cirrhosis: Complication or therapeutic opportunity? Gut. 2013;**62**:479-482

[61] Lisman T, Leebeek FW, de Groot PG. Haemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease. Journal of Hepatology. 2002;**37**:280-287

[62] Drolz A, Horvatits T, Roedl K, Rutter K, Staufer K, Kneidinger N, et al. Coagulation parameters and major bleeding in critically ill patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2016;**64**:556-568

[63] Everett LA, Cleuren AC, Khoriaty RN, Ginsburg D. Murine coagulation factor VIII is synthesized in endothelial cells. Blood. 2014;**123**:3697-3705

[64] Tripodi A, Primignani M, Chantarangkul V, Dell'Era A, Clerici M, de Franchis R, et al. An imbalance of pro- vs anti-coagulation factors in plasma from patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2009;**137**:2105-2111

[65] Peck-Radosavljevic M. Thrombocytopenia in liver disease. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2000;**14**(Suppl D):60d-66d

[66] Yongxiang W, Zongfang L, Guowei L, Zongzheng J, Xi C, Tao W. Effects of splenomegaly and splenic macrophage activity in hypersplenism due to cirrhosis. The American Journal of Medicine. 2002;**113**:428-431

**59**

*Stroke and Liver Cirrhosis: A Brief Review of Current Evidence*

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2015;**30**:1522-1528

control in cirrhotic patients with

and prognosis. Zeitschrift für

2017;**141**:1148-1160

2006;**98**:1369-1373

[78] Nderitu P, Bosco C, Garmo H, Holmberg L, Malmstrom H, Hammar N, et al. The association between individual metabolic syndrome components, primary liver cancer and cirrhosis: A study in the Swedish AMORIS cohort. International Journal of Cancer.

[79] Sierra-Johnson J, Somers VK, Kuniyoshi FH, Garza CA, Isley WL, Gami AS, et al. Comparison of apolipoprotein-B/apolipoprotein-AI in subjects with versus without the metabolic syndrome. The American Journal of Cardiology.

of transjugular intrahepatic

[76] Deschenes M, Somberg KA. Effect

portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on glycemic

diabetes mellitus. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1998;**93**:483

[77] Petrides AS. Hepatogenic diabetes: Pathophysiology, therapeutic options

Gastroenterologie. 1999;(Suppl 1):15-21

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90420*

[67] Moore KP, Aithal GP. Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis.

[68] Hsu SJ, Huang HC. Management of ascites in patients with liver cirrhosis: Recent evidence and controversies. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2013;**76**:123-130

Gut. 2006;**55**(Suppl 6):vi1-v12

[69] Iwakiri Y, Groszmann RJ. The hyperdynamic circulation of chronic liver diseases: From the patient to the molecule. Hepatology.

[70] Arroyo V, Gines P. Mechanism of sodium retention and ascites formation in cirrhosis. Journal of Hepatology.

2006;**43**:S121-S131

1993;**17**(Suppl 2):S24-S28

Sciences. 2016;**352**:285-295

Sciences. 2017;**354**:131-139

Hepatology. 2018;**15**:425-439

[73] Anstee QM, Mantovani A, Tilg H, Targher G. Risk of cardiomyopathy and cardiac arrhythmias in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology &

[74] Hickman IJ, Macdonald GA. Impact of diabetes on the severity of liver disease. The American Journal of Medicine. 2007;**120**:829-834

[75] Junker AE, Gluud LL, Holst JJ, Knop FK, Vilsboll T. Influence of gastrointestinal factors on glucose metabolism in patients with cirrhosis.

[72] Zhao J, Li S, Ren L, Guo X, Qi X. Pro-brain natriuretic peptide and troponin T-hypersensitivity levels correlate with the severity of liver dysfunction in liver cirrhosis. The American Journal of the Medical

[71] Zhao J, Qi X, Hou F, Ning Z,

Zhang X, Deng H, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and in-hospital outcomes of QTc interval prolongation in liver cirrhosis. The American Journal of the Medical

*Stroke and Liver Cirrhosis: A Brief Review of Current Evidence DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90420*

[67] Moore KP, Aithal GP. Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis. Gut. 2006;**55**(Suppl 6):vi1-v12

*Liver Pathology*

2017;**98**:393-397

European Journal of Haematology.

of ischemic events and abnormal supraortic flow patterns in patients with liver cirrhosis. Liver International.

[59] Choi J, Kim J, Shim JH, Kim M, Nam GB. Risks versus benefits of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in cirrhotic patients. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology.

Anticoagulation in patients with liver cirrhosis: Complication or therapeutic opportunity? Gut. 2013;**62**:479-482

2005;**25**(2):331-336

2017;**70**:255-262

[60] Jairath V, Burroughs A.

[61] Lisman T, Leebeek FW, de Groot PG. Haemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease. Journal of

Hepatology. 2002;**37**:280-287

[63] Everett LA, Cleuren AC, Khoriaty RN, Ginsburg D. Murine coagulation factor VIII is synthesized

in endothelial cells. Blood. 2014;**123**:3697-3705

[65] Peck-Radosavljevic M.

2000;**14**(Suppl D):60d-66d

2002;**113**:428-431

[66] Yongxiang W, Zongfang L, Guowei L, Zongzheng J, Xi C, Tao W. Effects of splenomegaly and splenic macrophage activity in hypersplenism due to cirrhosis. The American Journal of Medicine.

Thrombocytopenia in liver disease. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology.

[64] Tripodi A, Primignani M,

Chantarangkul V, Dell'Era A, Clerici M, de Franchis R, et al. An imbalance of pro- vs anti-coagulation factors in plasma from patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2009;**137**:2105-2111

[62] Drolz A, Horvatits T, Roedl K, Rutter K, Staufer K, Kneidinger N, et al. Coagulation parameters and major bleeding in critically ill patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2016;**64**:556-568

[51] Cho J, Choi SM, Yu SJ, Park YS, Lee CH, Lee SM, et al. Bleeding complications in critically ill patients with liver cirrhosis. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine. 2016;**31**:288-295

[52] Hung TH, Hsieh YH, Tseng KC, Tseng CW, Lee HF, Tsai CC, et al. High mortality in cirrhotic patients following hemorrhagic stroke. Journal of Clinical

Latimer DC, Sass DA, Rothstein K. A head CT is unnecessary in the initial evaluation of hepatic encephalopathy

[54] Huang HH, Lin HH, Shih YL, Chen PJ, Chang WK, Chu HC, et al. Spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2008;**110**:253-258

[55] Johnsen SP, Pedersen L, Friis S, Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, Olsen Jø H, et al. Nonaspirin nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and risk of hospitalization for intracerebral hemorrhage: A population-based casecontrol study. Stroke. 2003;**34**:387-391

[56] Francis RB Jr, Feinstein DI. Clinical significance of accelerated fibrinolysis

in-hospital outcomes. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.

in liver disease. Haemostasis.

[57] Zhang X, Qi X, Yoshida E, Méndez-Sánchez N, Hou F, Deng H, et al. Ischemic stroke in liver cirrhosis: Epidemiology, risk factors, and

[58] Berzigotti A, Bonfiglioli A, Muscari A, Bianchi G, Libassi S, Bernardi M, et al. Reduced prevalence

1984;**14**:460-465

2018;**30**:233-240

Neuroscience. 2015;**22**:995-997

[53] Bhandari BM, Kumar S,

in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2011;**140**:S903

**58**

[68] Hsu SJ, Huang HC. Management of ascites in patients with liver cirrhosis: Recent evidence and controversies. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2013;**76**:123-130

[69] Iwakiri Y, Groszmann RJ. The hyperdynamic circulation of chronic liver diseases: From the patient to the molecule. Hepatology. 2006;**43**:S121-S131

[70] Arroyo V, Gines P. Mechanism of sodium retention and ascites formation in cirrhosis. Journal of Hepatology. 1993;**17**(Suppl 2):S24-S28

[71] Zhao J, Qi X, Hou F, Ning Z, Zhang X, Deng H, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and in-hospital outcomes of QTc interval prolongation in liver cirrhosis. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 2016;**352**:285-295

[72] Zhao J, Li S, Ren L, Guo X, Qi X. Pro-brain natriuretic peptide and troponin T-hypersensitivity levels correlate with the severity of liver dysfunction in liver cirrhosis. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 2017;**354**:131-139

[73] Anstee QM, Mantovani A, Tilg H, Targher G. Risk of cardiomyopathy and cardiac arrhythmias in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2018;**15**:425-439

[74] Hickman IJ, Macdonald GA. Impact of diabetes on the severity of liver disease. The American Journal of Medicine. 2007;**120**:829-834

[75] Junker AE, Gluud LL, Holst JJ, Knop FK, Vilsboll T. Influence of gastrointestinal factors on glucose metabolism in patients with cirrhosis. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2015;**30**:1522-1528

[76] Deschenes M, Somberg KA. Effect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on glycemic control in cirrhotic patients with diabetes mellitus. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1998;**93**:483

[77] Petrides AS. Hepatogenic diabetes: Pathophysiology, therapeutic options and prognosis. Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie. 1999;(Suppl 1):15-21

[78] Nderitu P, Bosco C, Garmo H, Holmberg L, Malmstrom H, Hammar N, et al. The association between individual metabolic syndrome components, primary liver cancer and cirrhosis: A study in the Swedish AMORIS cohort. International Journal of Cancer. 2017;**141**:1148-1160

[79] Sierra-Johnson J, Somers VK, Kuniyoshi FH, Garza CA, Isley WL, Gami AS, et al. Comparison of apolipoprotein-B/apolipoprotein-AI in subjects with versus without the metabolic syndrome. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2006;**98**:1369-1373

**61**

**Chapter 4**

**Abstract**

hepatitis

**1. Introduction**

heart and the liver (e.g., systemic amyloidosis).

Cardiac Hepatopathy

*Javier Crespo and Emilio Fábrega*

*Jose Ignacio Fortea, Ángela Puente, Antonio Cuadrado,* 

relevant as the cardiac disease and further complicate its management.

**Keywords:** cirrhosis, portal hypertension, heart failure, heart transplantation,

Heart failure (HF) is a systemic clinical syndrome with typical symptoms and signs (e.g., dyspnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, orthopnea, elevated jugular venous pressure, and peripheral edema) caused by a structural and/or functional cardiac abnormality, resulting in reduced cardiac output and/or elevated intracardiac pressures. It is a major public health problem with an estimated prevalence of 1–2% of the adult population in the developed countries, rising to ≥10% among people >70 years of age [1]. Although much of the research on its systemic interactions has focused on the so-called cardio-renal syndrome, cardio-hepatic interactions are arousing great interest in recent years [2]. These cardio-hepatic interactions have been classified into three groups according to the role of each organ as culprit or victim of the other [3, 4]: (1) liver disease resulting from heart disease; (2) heart disease resulting from liver disease (e.g., cirrhotic cardiomyopathy); and (3) systemic diseases that affect both the

This chapter seeks to make a comprehensive review of the first group: liver disease resulting from heart disease. This type of liver disease has generally been referred as "cardiac hepatopathy," although there is still no consensus on terminology [5, 6]. The two main forms of cardiac hepatopathy are acute cardiogenic liver

*Patricia Huelin, Inés García, Marta Mayorga, Raul Pellon,* 

Liver disease resulting from heart disease has generally been referred as "cardiac hepatopathy." The two main forms of cardiac hepatopathy are acute cardiogenic liver injury (ACLI) and congestive hepatopathy (CH). ACLI most commonly occurs in the setting of acute cardiocirculatory failure, whereas CH results from passive venous congestion in the setting of chronic right-sided heart failure (HF). Both conditions often coexist and potentiate the deleterious effects of each other on the liver. In CH, the chronic passive congestion leads to sinusoidal hypertension, centrilobular fibrosis, and ultimately, cirrhosis ("cardiac cirrhosis") and hepatocellular carcinoma. The differentiation between congestion and fibrosis currently represents an unmet need and a growing research area. Although cardiac cirrhosis may only arise after several decades of ongoing injury, the long-term survival of cardiac patients due to advances in medical and surgical treatments is responsible for the increased number of liver complications in this setting. Eventually, the liver disease could become as clinically

## **Chapter 4** Cardiac Hepatopathy

*Jose Ignacio Fortea, Ángela Puente, Antonio Cuadrado, Patricia Huelin, Inés García, Marta Mayorga, Raul Pellon, Javier Crespo and Emilio Fábrega*

#### **Abstract**

Liver disease resulting from heart disease has generally been referred as "cardiac hepatopathy." The two main forms of cardiac hepatopathy are acute cardiogenic liver injury (ACLI) and congestive hepatopathy (CH). ACLI most commonly occurs in the setting of acute cardiocirculatory failure, whereas CH results from passive venous congestion in the setting of chronic right-sided heart failure (HF). Both conditions often coexist and potentiate the deleterious effects of each other on the liver. In CH, the chronic passive congestion leads to sinusoidal hypertension, centrilobular fibrosis, and ultimately, cirrhosis ("cardiac cirrhosis") and hepatocellular carcinoma. The differentiation between congestion and fibrosis currently represents an unmet need and a growing research area. Although cardiac cirrhosis may only arise after several decades of ongoing injury, the long-term survival of cardiac patients due to advances in medical and surgical treatments is responsible for the increased number of liver complications in this setting. Eventually, the liver disease could become as clinically relevant as the cardiac disease and further complicate its management.

**Keywords:** cirrhosis, portal hypertension, heart failure, heart transplantation, hepatitis

#### **1. Introduction**

Heart failure (HF) is a systemic clinical syndrome with typical symptoms and signs (e.g., dyspnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, orthopnea, elevated jugular venous pressure, and peripheral edema) caused by a structural and/or functional cardiac abnormality, resulting in reduced cardiac output and/or elevated intracardiac pressures. It is a major public health problem with an estimated prevalence of 1–2% of the adult population in the developed countries, rising to ≥10% among people >70 years of age [1]. Although much of the research on its systemic interactions has focused on the so-called cardio-renal syndrome, cardio-hepatic interactions are arousing great interest in recent years [2]. These cardio-hepatic interactions have been classified into three groups according to the role of each organ as culprit or victim of the other [3, 4]: (1) liver disease resulting from heart disease; (2) heart disease resulting from liver disease (e.g., cirrhotic cardiomyopathy); and (3) systemic diseases that affect both the heart and the liver (e.g., systemic amyloidosis).

This chapter seeks to make a comprehensive review of the first group: liver disease resulting from heart disease. This type of liver disease has generally been referred as "cardiac hepatopathy," although there is still no consensus on terminology [5, 6]. The two main forms of cardiac hepatopathy are acute cardiogenic liver

injury (ACLI) and congestive hepatopathy (CH). ACLI most commonly occurs in the setting of acute cardiocirculatory failure, whereas CH results from passive venous congestion in the setting of chronic right-sided HF. Both conditions often coexist and potentiate the deleterious effects of each other on the liver [5–7]. In the following pages, we aim to describe their pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment.

#### **2. Hepatic circulation**

The liver receives a dual blood supply from the hepatic artery and portal vein. The former delivers well-oxygenated blood and comprises approximately 25% of total hepatic blood flow, whereas the remaining 75% is deoxygenated blood supplied by the portal vein. The total hepatic blood flow ranges from 800 to 1200 ml/ min, representing up to 25% of the total cardiac output [7]. As a highly vascular organ, it is sensitive to hemodynamic changes but resilient to ischemic damage through its robust vascular mechanisms of defense [3]. The hepatic artery buffer response is one of such mechanisms whereby decreased portal flow instigates compensatory up-regulation of hepatic arterial flow. It is estimated that it may be capable of compensating for up to a 60% decrease in portal flow [3, 7, 8]. The signaling pathway for this response is local, with the reduction of portal flow resulting in an increase in concentration of the vasodilator adenosine [9]. Unlike the hepatic artery, the portal vein does not have the ability to autoregulate its flow and is dependent on cardiac output and the gradient between portal and hepatic venous pressures [7, 8]. The high permeability of sinusoids represents a second mechanism of defense against hypoxia. It favors oxygen diffusion to the hepatocytes, increasing oxygen extraction to levels near 90%. It prevents any change in liver oxygen consumption despite decreases in liver blood flow up to half of its normal. It must be highlighted that this remarkable ability is exclusive to the liver [7, 10, 11].

By contrast, the protective mechanisms against congestion are less developed and mainly rely on the highly connected sinusoidal network to relieve the increase in pressure. This elevated pressure hits the sinusoidal bed without attenuation since the hepatic veins lack valves [6]. As will be explained in greater detail below, the pre-existing hepatic congestion predisposes the liver to hypoxic injury under any acute event resulting in reduced hepatic blood flow [7, 12].

#### **3. Acute cardiogenic liver injury (ACLI)**

ACLI has also been referred to as ischemic hepatitis, shock liver, or hypoxic hepatitis in medical literature. These terms reflect the long-standing debate regarding its pathogenesis [7]. In 1901, F.B. Mallory (of Mallory-Denk body fame) first described the typical pattern of centrilobular liver necrosis (CLN) characteristic of this entity based on a series of autopsies in Boston. He proposed a toxic theory whereby liver damage was secondary to toxins released by bacteria into the circulation [13]. This theory was soon challenged by Lambert and Allison who found no proof of bacterial infection in a series of 112 patients deceased from congestive HF, 30% of whom had CLN [14]. They then proposed passive congestion as its prime etiological factor, and this "congestion theory" prevailed for more than 50 years. The emergence of transaminases measurement in the early 1950s revealed the massive increase of these enzymes that come in parallel with CLN. The association between shock, CLN, and significant rise in transaminases found by different studies led some investigators to propose liver ischemia as the sole factor responsible for liver cell necrosis [15–18]. It was then that

**63**

*Cardiac Hepatopathy*

scenario [2, 5, 24, 25].

be underestimated [7, 12].

**3.2 Pathophysiology**

**3.1 Epidemiology**

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

the terms "shock liver" and "ischemic hepatitis" were introduced by Birgens et al. [19] and Bynum et al. [20], respectively. Hence, by the late 1970s, the "ischemic" theory had replaced the "congestion" theory and remained unquestioned until 1990. In this year, Henrion et al. reported the first prospective series with hemodynamic data of 45 episodes of ischemic hepatitis. They observed that a shock state was only present in 47% of the episodes and proposed renaming this liver injury "hypoxic hepatitis" as hypoxia from a variety of etiologies (e.g., sepsis and respiratory failure) was present in all cases [21]. These findings were later confirmed by the final report from the same authors including 142 episodes [22] and by the series of 322 cases of ischemic hepatitis published later by Birrer et al. [23]. Thus, the term hypoxic hepatitis together with ACLI is currently used to name this entity. Some authors believe that ACLI provides more details about the underlying pathophysiological process as an acute cardiac event in a patient with an underlying congestive liver represents the most common clinical

The prevalence of ACLI among patients admitted to hospital varies greatly depending on the severity of illness. Indeed, in a recent meta-analysis of 1782 cases, ACLI was present in two every 1000 patients for all levels of hospital care but increased to 2.5 out of every 100 patients in intensive care units (ICUs) [26]. Studies including very critically ill patients have described maximum figures ranging from 11.9 to 21.9% [27–29]. Although previously debated [7], recent series indicate that the presence of a primary liver disease also increases the risk of ACLI. In a nationwide study including patients with hemodynamic instability, Waseem et al. observed a prevalence of acute liver injury of 22% in patients with underlying liver

disease compared to only 3% in those without baseline hepatopathy [30].

These variations in frequency of ACLI not only respond to the severity of illness or the presence of a primary liver disease, as sometimes the diagnosis is overlooked clinically and variable cutoffs of transaminases are an important determinant of prevalence. Thus, in the previous meta-analysis, different liver enzyme cutoffs were used among studies as inclusion criteria, and the highest frequency of ACLI was among patients with increased serum aminotransferases above 1000 IU/L, where the prevalence reached 57% [26]. Therefore, current prevalence rates of ACLI might

Liver damage in ACLI is the result of several mechanisms: passive congestion reduced hepatic blood flow, total body hypoxemia, inability to utilize oxygen, and ischemia/reperfusion injury. Necrosis, rather than apoptosis, is the main mode of death due to these mechanisms [31]. Although frequently multifactorial, the predominating mechanism of damage can be different depending on the underlying condition [7, 12]. In this regard, the most frequent diseases leading to ACLI are HF, respiratory failure, and septic shock, accounting for more than 90% of cases [7]. These diseases often coexist and lead to ACLI. Hence, Fuhrmann et al. identified more than one disease contributing to ACLI in 74% of their study population [27]. As mentioned previously, HF represents the main underlying condition in ACLI. The proportion of ACLI cases due to HF published in the literature ranges from 39 to 78% [7, 12, 22, 23, 26–28]. In this condition, the main mechanisms involved in the development of ACLI are passive congestion and ischemia of the liver. Indeed, in this scenario, ACLI is believed to reflect the extreme of a spectrum of liver injury that begins with passive hepatic congestion since the vast majority of patients have

the terms "shock liver" and "ischemic hepatitis" were introduced by Birgens et al. [19] and Bynum et al. [20], respectively. Hence, by the late 1970s, the "ischemic" theory had replaced the "congestion" theory and remained unquestioned until 1990. In this year, Henrion et al. reported the first prospective series with hemodynamic data of 45 episodes of ischemic hepatitis. They observed that a shock state was only present in 47% of the episodes and proposed renaming this liver injury "hypoxic hepatitis" as hypoxia from a variety of etiologies (e.g., sepsis and respiratory failure) was present in all cases [21]. These findings were later confirmed by the final report from the same authors including 142 episodes [22] and by the series of 322 cases of ischemic hepatitis published later by Birrer et al. [23]. Thus, the term hypoxic hepatitis together with ACLI is currently used to name this entity. Some authors believe that ACLI provides more details about the underlying pathophysiological process as an acute cardiac event in a patient with an underlying congestive liver represents the most common clinical scenario [2, 5, 24, 25].

#### **3.1 Epidemiology**

*Liver Pathology*

sis, and treatment.

**2. Hepatic circulation**

injury (ACLI) and congestive hepatopathy (CH). ACLI most commonly occurs in the setting of acute cardiocirculatory failure, whereas CH results from passive venous congestion in the setting of chronic right-sided HF. Both conditions often coexist and potentiate the deleterious effects of each other on the liver [5–7]. In the following pages, we aim to describe their pathophysiology, clinical features, diagno-

The liver receives a dual blood supply from the hepatic artery and portal vein. The former delivers well-oxygenated blood and comprises approximately 25% of total hepatic blood flow, whereas the remaining 75% is deoxygenated blood supplied by the portal vein. The total hepatic blood flow ranges from 800 to 1200 ml/ min, representing up to 25% of the total cardiac output [7]. As a highly vascular organ, it is sensitive to hemodynamic changes but resilient to ischemic damage through its robust vascular mechanisms of defense [3]. The hepatic artery buffer response is one of such mechanisms whereby decreased portal flow instigates compensatory up-regulation of hepatic arterial flow. It is estimated that it may be capable of compensating for up to a 60% decrease in portal flow [3, 7, 8]. The signaling pathway for this response is local, with the reduction of portal flow resulting in an increase in concentration of the vasodilator adenosine [9]. Unlike the hepatic artery, the portal vein does not have the ability to autoregulate its flow and is dependent on cardiac output and the gradient between portal and hepatic venous pressures [7, 8]. The high permeability of sinusoids represents a second mechanism of defense against hypoxia. It favors oxygen diffusion to the hepatocytes, increasing oxygen extraction to levels near 90%. It prevents any change in liver oxygen consumption despite decreases in liver blood flow up to half of its normal. It must be

highlighted that this remarkable ability is exclusive to the liver [7, 10, 11].

acute event resulting in reduced hepatic blood flow [7, 12].

**3. Acute cardiogenic liver injury (ACLI)**

By contrast, the protective mechanisms against congestion are less developed and mainly rely on the highly connected sinusoidal network to relieve the increase in pressure. This elevated pressure hits the sinusoidal bed without attenuation since the hepatic veins lack valves [6]. As will be explained in greater detail below, the pre-existing hepatic congestion predisposes the liver to hypoxic injury under any

ACLI has also been referred to as ischemic hepatitis, shock liver, or hypoxic hepatitis in medical literature. These terms reflect the long-standing debate regarding its pathogenesis [7]. In 1901, F.B. Mallory (of Mallory-Denk body fame) first described the typical pattern of centrilobular liver necrosis (CLN) characteristic of this entity based on a series of autopsies in Boston. He proposed a toxic theory whereby liver damage was secondary to toxins released by bacteria into the circulation [13]. This theory was soon challenged by Lambert and Allison who found no proof of bacterial infection in a series of 112 patients deceased from congestive HF, 30% of whom had CLN [14]. They then proposed passive congestion as its prime etiological factor, and this "congestion theory" prevailed for more than 50 years. The emergence of transaminases measurement in the early 1950s revealed the massive increase of these enzymes that come in parallel with CLN. The association between shock, CLN, and significant rise in transaminases found by different studies led some investigators to propose liver ischemia as the sole factor responsible for liver cell necrosis [15–18]. It was then that

**62**

The prevalence of ACLI among patients admitted to hospital varies greatly depending on the severity of illness. Indeed, in a recent meta-analysis of 1782 cases, ACLI was present in two every 1000 patients for all levels of hospital care but increased to 2.5 out of every 100 patients in intensive care units (ICUs) [26]. Studies including very critically ill patients have described maximum figures ranging from 11.9 to 21.9% [27–29]. Although previously debated [7], recent series indicate that the presence of a primary liver disease also increases the risk of ACLI. In a nationwide study including patients with hemodynamic instability, Waseem et al. observed a prevalence of acute liver injury of 22% in patients with underlying liver disease compared to only 3% in those without baseline hepatopathy [30].

These variations in frequency of ACLI not only respond to the severity of illness or the presence of a primary liver disease, as sometimes the diagnosis is overlooked clinically and variable cutoffs of transaminases are an important determinant of prevalence. Thus, in the previous meta-analysis, different liver enzyme cutoffs were used among studies as inclusion criteria, and the highest frequency of ACLI was among patients with increased serum aminotransferases above 1000 IU/L, where the prevalence reached 57% [26]. Therefore, current prevalence rates of ACLI might be underestimated [7, 12].

#### **3.2 Pathophysiology**

Liver damage in ACLI is the result of several mechanisms: passive congestion reduced hepatic blood flow, total body hypoxemia, inability to utilize oxygen, and ischemia/reperfusion injury. Necrosis, rather than apoptosis, is the main mode of death due to these mechanisms [31]. Although frequently multifactorial, the predominating mechanism of damage can be different depending on the underlying condition [7, 12]. In this regard, the most frequent diseases leading to ACLI are HF, respiratory failure, and septic shock, accounting for more than 90% of cases [7]. These diseases often coexist and lead to ACLI. Hence, Fuhrmann et al. identified more than one disease contributing to ACLI in 74% of their study population [27].

As mentioned previously, HF represents the main underlying condition in ACLI. The proportion of ACLI cases due to HF published in the literature ranges from 39 to 78% [7, 12, 22, 23, 26–28]. In this condition, the main mechanisms involved in the development of ACLI are passive congestion and ischemia of the liver. Indeed, in this scenario, ACLI is believed to reflect the extreme of a spectrum of liver injury that begins with passive hepatic congestion since the vast majority of patients have

markedly elevated cardiac filling pressures [17, 22, 26, 32, 33]. Thus, several studies have shown how, despite similar hemodynamic derangements, only those with a pre-existing congestive liver developed ACLI [23, 29, 33]. This crucial role of passive congestion of the liver justifies the rare occurrence of ACLI in hemorrhagic or hypovolemic shock [7]. Most importantly, Seeto et al. showed that 15–20 minutes of hypotension is sufficient to provoke ACLI [33]. This explains why hemodynamic instability is not systematically observed, since such a brief period can easily be unrecognized.

Respiratory failure accounts for approximately 15% of ACLI cases [7]. Severe hypoxemia resulting from an exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease is the main mechanism leading to ACLI. Very low levels of arterial pressure in oxygen (i.e., under 40 mmHg) are commonly observed, as well as the coexistence of hepatic venous congestion. In this setting, cardiac output and hepatic blood flow are normal or even increased [22, 23].

Septic shock is the cause of ACLI in 15–30% of cases. The prime factor leading to hypoxia is both the increased demands of oxygen and the decreased ability of hepatocytes to utilize oxygen [7]. It has been postulated that inflammatory mediators and endotoxins may be behind this abnormal oxygen utilization [7, 34, 35]. Although at the initial phases of septic shock hepatic blood flow is increased, the progression from high to low cardiac output may occur rapidly and aggravate the hypoxic damage [12].

While the previously described mechanisms induced ACLI by causing liver hypoxia, it has been postulated that re-oxygenation is also required [7, 12]. Several observations support this role of ischemia/reperfusion injury in ACLI: (1) it has been described that liver cell necrosis occurs at the time of reperfusion not ischemia [7]; (2) the incidence and severity of CLN correlate with the duration of shock. In fulminant and refractory cardiogenic shock (median duration of shock was 3 hours), CLN was only observed in a minority of patients and was mild [21, 29], whereas earlier studies showed how the longer the period of shock the greater the severity and frequency of CLN [36, 37]. One explanation of these findings is that long-lasting shocks probably harbor transient periods of hemodynamic stability and re-oxygenation that can cause ischemia/reperfusion injury and subsequently induce ACLI. (3) In a minority of ACLI cases, liver necrosis is limited to the mediolobular zone and spares the centrilobular zone [38–40]. Henrion et al. postulated that this atypical histological pattern could be due to an incomplete liver reperfusion prior to death that only reached periportal and mediolobular liver cells. Hence, periportal and centrilobular cells would have survived, the former because of oxygen delivery remained sufficient, and the latter because of the absence of reperfusion injury. Mediolobular hepatocytes, on the other hand, would have been destroyed due to ischemia/reperfusion injury [7].

#### **3.3 Clinical presentation and diagnosis**

The majority of ACLI cases occur in elderly men (i.e., 65–70 years) with congestive HF that has deteriorated over the past few days. It must be highlighted that a shock state is far from being a constant feature as is observed in around half of the cases. Moreover, the cardiac component may not be apparent at first evaluation as usual signs of HF, such as painful hepatomegaly, ankle edema, or hepatojugular reflux, are frequently lacking. Therefore, the diagnosis of ACLI cannot be rejected because of the absence of shock and of signs of HF, and in case of uncertainty, a cardiac evaluation is warranted [6, 7]. Symptoms due to ACLI are often absent or resemble those from acute viral hepatitis [24], and more commonly, the clinical picture is dominated by symptoms of the underlying conditions. Overt jaundice is absent at admission, and encephalopathy can develop but is usually the result of hemodynamic instability and hypoxia, rather than liver failure [7, 12].

**65**

**Figure 1.**

*Laboratory parameters during the course of ACLI in a patient with respiratory failure due to drug overdose. Abbreviations: AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; LDH: Lactate* 

*dehydrogenase; Bb; bilirubin; INR: International normalized ratio.*

*Cardiac Hepatopathy*

treated in our hospital.

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

Laboratory tests show a substantial and rapid increase in aminotransferases and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels to 10–20 times the upper limit of normal, usually 1–3 days after hemodynamic deterioration. These elevations generally return to normal within 7–10 days if hemodynamic stability is restored [3, 41]. A progressive increase in bilirubin is usually seen but is seldom severe [3, 7, 12]. The higher values reported by recent series may be explained by the inclusion of more patients with septic shock. Nonetheless, the mean bilirubin value in these studies was lower than 6 mg/dL [27, 28]. Higher values may suggest progression to acute liver failure [6]. Unlike in children where hypoglycemia has been regarded as a distinct feature of ACLI, in adults both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia have been reported [7, 12]. Although no analytical alteration is pathognomonic of ACLI, there are some findings that suggest its diagnosis [7]: (1) an alanine aminotransferase (ALT)-to-LDH ratio <1.5 is of great help in the differential diagnosis as it is rarely seen in other etiologies of hepatitis [42]; (2) the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) generally peaks earlier and higher than ALT [41]. The rational behind this finding lays on the concentration of aminotransferases throughout the hepatic acinus. ALT reaches the highest concentration at the level of periportal hepatocytes (Rappaport liver zone 1) and the lowest concentration at the level of pericentral hepatocytes (Rappaport liver zone 3), while AST maintains a stable concentration throughout the entire acinus. Hence, after the hypoxic insult, the initial concentrations of AST are higher than those of ALT, since the lower oxygen concentration of pericentral hepatocytes makes them more susceptible to hypoxic damage [43]. Once the cause of liver damage is resolved, the concentration of ALT exceeds that of AST in subsequent days, due to its longer half-life (47 ± 10 hours versus 17 ± 5 hours, respectively) [44]. Aboelsoud et al. [41] universally observed this pattern, but it was only described in 75% of the cases in Henrion's study [22]. The rapid decline and reversal of the AST-ALT ratio may explain these differences, and therefore, an ALT higher than AST should not discard ACLI; (3) an early and sharp deterioration in prothrombin activity and renal function also supports ACLI. Such abnormalities are unusual at presentation in patients with viral or drug-induced hepatitis, unless ALF is already established [7]. **Figure 1** shows a typical biochemical profile of ACLI in a patient

#### *Cardiac Hepatopathy DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

*Liver Pathology*

or even increased [22, 23].

hypoxic damage [12].

markedly elevated cardiac filling pressures [17, 22, 26, 32, 33]. Thus, several studies have shown how, despite similar hemodynamic derangements, only those with a pre-existing congestive liver developed ACLI [23, 29, 33]. This crucial role of passive congestion of the liver justifies the rare occurrence of ACLI in hemorrhagic or hypovolemic shock [7]. Most importantly, Seeto et al. showed that 15–20 minutes of hypotension is sufficient to provoke ACLI [33]. This explains why hemodynamic instability is not systematically observed, since such a brief period can easily be unrecognized. Respiratory failure accounts for approximately 15% of ACLI cases [7]. Severe hypoxemia resulting from an exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease is the main mechanism leading to ACLI. Very low levels of arterial pressure in oxygen (i.e., under 40 mmHg) are commonly observed, as well as the coexistence of hepatic venous congestion. In this setting, cardiac output and hepatic blood flow are normal

Septic shock is the cause of ACLI in 15–30% of cases. The prime factor leading to hypoxia is both the increased demands of oxygen and the decreased ability of hepatocytes to utilize oxygen [7]. It has been postulated that inflammatory mediators and endotoxins may be behind this abnormal oxygen utilization [7, 34, 35]. Although at the initial phases of septic shock hepatic blood flow is increased, the progression from high to low cardiac output may occur rapidly and aggravate the

While the previously described mechanisms induced ACLI by causing liver hypoxia, it has been postulated that re-oxygenation is also required [7, 12]. Several observations support this role of ischemia/reperfusion injury in ACLI: (1) it has been described that liver cell necrosis occurs at the time of reperfusion not ischemia [7]; (2) the incidence and severity of CLN correlate with the duration of shock. In fulminant and refractory cardiogenic shock (median duration of shock was 3 hours), CLN was only observed in a minority of patients and was mild [21, 29], whereas earlier studies showed how the longer the period of shock the greater the severity and frequency of CLN [36, 37]. One explanation of these findings is that long-lasting shocks probably harbor transient periods of hemodynamic stability and re-oxygenation that can cause ischemia/reperfusion injury and subsequently induce ACLI. (3) In a minority of ACLI cases, liver necrosis is limited to the mediolobular zone and spares the centrilobular zone [38–40]. Henrion et al. postulated that this atypical histological pattern could be due to an incomplete liver reperfusion prior to death that only reached periportal and mediolobular liver cells. Hence, periportal and centrilobular cells would have survived, the former because of oxygen delivery remained sufficient, and the latter because of the absence of reperfusion injury. Mediolobular hepatocytes, on the other hand, would

The majority of ACLI cases occur in elderly men (i.e., 65–70 years) with congestive HF that has deteriorated over the past few days. It must be highlighted that a shock state is far from being a constant feature as is observed in around half of the cases. Moreover, the cardiac component may not be apparent at first evaluation as usual signs of HF, such as painful hepatomegaly, ankle edema, or hepatojugular reflux, are frequently lacking. Therefore, the diagnosis of ACLI cannot be rejected because of the absence of shock and of signs of HF, and in case of uncertainty, a cardiac evaluation is warranted [6, 7]. Symptoms due to ACLI are often absent or resemble those from acute viral hepatitis [24], and more commonly, the clinical picture is dominated by symptoms of the underlying conditions. Overt jaundice is absent at admission, and encephalopathy can develop but is usually the result of

have been destroyed due to ischemia/reperfusion injury [7].

hemodynamic instability and hypoxia, rather than liver failure [7, 12].

**3.3 Clinical presentation and diagnosis**

**64**

Laboratory tests show a substantial and rapid increase in aminotransferases and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels to 10–20 times the upper limit of normal, usually 1–3 days after hemodynamic deterioration. These elevations generally return to normal within 7–10 days if hemodynamic stability is restored [3, 41]. A progressive increase in bilirubin is usually seen but is seldom severe [3, 7, 12]. The higher values reported by recent series may be explained by the inclusion of more patients with septic shock. Nonetheless, the mean bilirubin value in these studies was lower than 6 mg/dL [27, 28]. Higher values may suggest progression to acute liver failure [6]. Unlike in children where hypoglycemia has been regarded as a distinct feature of ACLI, in adults both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia have been reported [7, 12]. Although no analytical alteration is pathognomonic of ACLI, there are some findings that suggest its diagnosis [7]: (1) an alanine aminotransferase (ALT)-to-LDH ratio <1.5 is of great help in the differential diagnosis as it is rarely seen in other etiologies of hepatitis [42]; (2) the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) generally peaks earlier and higher than ALT [41]. The rational behind this finding lays on the concentration of aminotransferases throughout the hepatic acinus. ALT reaches the highest concentration at the level of periportal hepatocytes (Rappaport liver zone 1) and the lowest concentration at the level of pericentral hepatocytes (Rappaport liver zone 3), while AST maintains a stable concentration throughout the entire acinus. Hence, after the hypoxic insult, the initial concentrations of AST are higher than those of ALT, since the lower oxygen concentration of pericentral hepatocytes makes them more susceptible to hypoxic damage [43]. Once the cause of liver damage is resolved, the concentration of ALT exceeds that of AST in subsequent days, due to its longer half-life (47 ± 10 hours versus 17 ± 5 hours, respectively) [44]. Aboelsoud et al. [41] universally observed this pattern, but it was only described in 75% of the cases in Henrion's study [22]. The rapid decline and reversal of the AST-ALT ratio may explain these differences, and therefore, an ALT higher than AST should not discard ACLI; (3) an early and sharp deterioration in prothrombin activity and renal function also supports ACLI. Such abnormalities are unusual at presentation in patients with viral or drug-induced hepatitis, unless ALF is already established [7]. **Figure 1** shows a typical biochemical profile of ACLI in a patient treated in our hospital.

**Figure 1.**

*Laboratory parameters during the course of ACLI in a patient with respiratory failure due to drug overdose. Abbreviations: AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; LDH: Lactate dehydrogenase; Bb; bilirubin; INR: International normalized ratio.*

In accordance with the above, diagnosis of ACLI is usually made when the following criteria are met [12, 22, 26]: (1) an appropriate clinical setting of cardiac, respiratory, or circulatory failure; (2) a severe increase in aminotransferase levels; and (3) exclusion of other causes of acute liver damage. The differential diagnosis for severe elevations of transaminases is relatively limited and includes ACLI, acute viral hepatitis, toxin- or drug-induced liver injury, autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson's disease, acute bile duct obstruction, and acute Budd-Chiari syndrome [44]. Imaging techniques are essential to rule out some of these etiologies and can also support the diagnosis by finding a dilation of inferior vena cava and suprahepatic veins due to passive congestion [7]. Liver biopsy is rarely necessary and only when the underlying cause remains unclear. It will show features of coagulative necrosis of centrilobular hepatocytes without significant inflammation (**Figure 2A–C**). In biopsies delayed several days, however, there may be neutrophils infiltrating the affected regions [25]. As already stated, necrosis rarely occurs predominantly in the middle zone [38–40].

#### **3.4 Prognosis and treatment**

The prognosis of ACLI is poor with an overall hospital mortality of 51% [26] and 1-year survival rate of approximately 25% [7]. The cause of death is usually the underlying condition, as it is an uncommon cause of ALF. In a study from the Acute Liver Failure Study Group, only 4.4% of the ALF cases had ACLI as their final diagnosis [45]. Nevertheless, there is some indirect evidence that suggests that ACLI influences outcome in this setting. Hence, prolonged international normalized ratio (INR) and jaundice have been identified as independent risk factors for ACLI mortality [27, 28, 41, 46]. Other factors that have been associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality include a baseline liver disease [30], higher elevations of transaminases [27, 45], LDH [27, 41], serum phosphate [45], concomitant renal failure [28, 41], septic shock [27, 28], and more advanced encephalopathy [45].

The management of the underlying diseases remains the only established treatment for ACLI. Although data are limited, some experts recommend using N-acetylcysteine, avoiding excessive vascular filling to minimize passive congestion of the liver, and favoring the use of dobutamine in patients with low cardiac index given its inotropic and vasodilating effects [2, 3, 7, 12].

#### **Figure 2.**

*(A) Postmortem example of a liver with ischemic zones around centrilobular veins. (B) Centrilobular regions show congestion and coagulative necrosis (hematoxylin-eosin). (C) Same findings than 2.B with greater magnification.*

**67**

*Cardiac Hepatopathy*

**4.1 Epidemiology**

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

Liver disease as a consequence of HF has been known for a long time. The histological description of the "nutmeg," congestive liver is attributed to Kiernan in 1833 [25, 47]. Earlier studies from the beginning of the twentieth century started providing data on the structural and functional changes that develop in the liver in the setting of HF [47, 48]. The classic work from Sheila Sherlock, published in 1951, stood for decades as the standard reference on this entity. In this article, the renowned author correlated liver tests, systemic hemodynamic parameters, and histology [47]. Progress has been made since then, but there are still important gaps concerning its pathophysiology, assessment of liver fibrosis, and clinical impact on overall HF prognosis [2, 6].

CH occurs in the setting of any cause of right ventricular failure such as constrictive pericarditis, mitral stenosis, severe tricuspid regurgitation, cor pulmonale, or end-stage cardiomyopathies [8, 49]. The current spectrum of CH differs from earlier reports due to several reasons [3, 4, 6, 50]: (1) the etiology of HF has changed over the years with ischemic cardiomyopathy surpassing rheumatic valvular disease; (2) after major advances in medical treatment and the widespread use of heart transplantation, the prognosis of HF has greatly improved, and as a result, cardiac cirrhosis is declining; (3) these same medical advances are responsible for the improved survival of patients with a variety of congenital heart diseases that lead to right HF. The most illustrative example is the Fontan procedure to palliate single-ventricle physiology. Unlike patients with acquired heart disease, these

This heterogeneous cause of CH together with the limited validated techniques available to diagnose and, specially, stage the disease may explain that the burden of CH has not yet been adequately described [51]. Non-congenital HF studies using liver blood tests to determine the prevalence of CH have described figures ranging from 15 to 80%, depending on the severity of heart disease [24, 52–57]. However, liver blood tests neither accurately diagnose CH nor reflect the stage of liver disease [51]. Future studies should use a more comprehensive approach to overcome these

Congestion produces liver damage through several pathogenic mechanisms: (1) increased sinusoidal pressure leads to hepatic stellate cell activation and decreases nitric oxide production by endothelial cells through shear stress, all of which induce sinusoidal ischemia and promote fibrogenesis [51, 58]; (2) decreased hepatic blood flow further aggravates liver ischemia. Portal venous inflow is reduced as a result of the transmission of the elevated central venous pressure to the sinusoidal network, while arterial flow can also be compromised in patients who also harbor a left-sided HF [8, 51]; (3) Accumulation of exudate into the space of Disse due to the existing congestion impairs diffusion of oxygen and nutrients to hepatocytes and accelerates fibrosis pathways [8]; (4) Sinusoidal stasis and congestion promote sinusoidal thrombosis, which in turn contributes to liver fibrosis by causing parenchymal extinction and by activating hepatic stellate cells via protease-activated receptors [59, 60]. The former refers to a hypothesis based on retrospective observations of ex-vivo human liver specimens of patients with CH. In this autopsy study, Wanless et al. demonstrated sinusoidal thrombi confined to areas of fibrosis, thereby suggesting that intrahepatic thrombosis is involved in liver fibrosis progression [61]. A recent experimental study provided evidence of the

patients may develop "cardiac cirrhosis" in early adulthood.

biases and to provide solid data on this issue.

**4.2 Pathophysiology**

**4. Congestive hepatopathy (CH)**

## **4. Congestive hepatopathy (CH)**

Liver disease as a consequence of HF has been known for a long time. The histological description of the "nutmeg," congestive liver is attributed to Kiernan in 1833 [25, 47]. Earlier studies from the beginning of the twentieth century started providing data on the structural and functional changes that develop in the liver in the setting of HF [47, 48]. The classic work from Sheila Sherlock, published in 1951, stood for decades as the standard reference on this entity. In this article, the renowned author correlated liver tests, systemic hemodynamic parameters, and histology [47]. Progress has been made since then, but there are still important gaps concerning its pathophysiology, assessment of liver fibrosis, and clinical impact on overall HF prognosis [2, 6].

#### **4.1 Epidemiology**

*Liver Pathology*

**3.4 Prognosis and treatment**

In accordance with the above, diagnosis of ACLI is usually made when the following criteria are met [12, 22, 26]: (1) an appropriate clinical setting of cardiac, respiratory, or circulatory failure; (2) a severe increase in aminotransferase levels; and (3) exclusion of other causes of acute liver damage. The differential diagnosis for severe elevations of transaminases is relatively limited and includes ACLI, acute viral hepatitis, toxin- or drug-induced liver injury, autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson's disease, acute bile duct obstruction, and acute Budd-Chiari syndrome [44]. Imaging techniques are essential to rule out some of these etiologies and can also support the diagnosis by finding a dilation of inferior vena cava and suprahepatic veins due to passive congestion [7]. Liver biopsy is rarely necessary and only when the underlying cause remains unclear. It will show features of coagulative necrosis of centrilobular hepatocytes without significant inflammation (**Figure 2A–C**). In biopsies delayed several days, however, there may be neutrophils infiltrating the affected regions [25]. As already

stated, necrosis rarely occurs predominantly in the middle zone [38–40].

given its inotropic and vasodilating effects [2, 3, 7, 12].

The prognosis of ACLI is poor with an overall hospital mortality of 51% [26] and 1-year survival rate of approximately 25% [7]. The cause of death is usually the underlying condition, as it is an uncommon cause of ALF. In a study from the Acute Liver Failure Study Group, only 4.4% of the ALF cases had ACLI as their final diagnosis [45]. Nevertheless, there is some indirect evidence that suggests that ACLI influences outcome in this setting. Hence, prolonged international normalized ratio (INR) and jaundice have been identified as independent risk factors for ACLI mortality [27, 28, 41, 46]. Other factors that have been associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality include a baseline liver disease [30], higher elevations of transaminases [27, 45], LDH [27, 41], serum phosphate [45], concomitant renal failure [28, 41], septic shock [27, 28], and more advanced encephalopathy [45]. The management of the underlying diseases remains the only established treatment for ACLI. Although data are limited, some experts recommend using N-acetylcysteine, avoiding excessive vascular filling to minimize passive congestion of the liver, and favoring the use of dobutamine in patients with low cardiac index

*(A) Postmortem example of a liver with ischemic zones around centrilobular veins. (B) Centrilobular regions show congestion and coagulative necrosis (hematoxylin-eosin). (C) Same findings than 2.B with greater magnification.*

**66**

**Figure 2.**

CH occurs in the setting of any cause of right ventricular failure such as constrictive pericarditis, mitral stenosis, severe tricuspid regurgitation, cor pulmonale, or end-stage cardiomyopathies [8, 49]. The current spectrum of CH differs from earlier reports due to several reasons [3, 4, 6, 50]: (1) the etiology of HF has changed over the years with ischemic cardiomyopathy surpassing rheumatic valvular disease; (2) after major advances in medical treatment and the widespread use of heart transplantation, the prognosis of HF has greatly improved, and as a result, cardiac cirrhosis is declining; (3) these same medical advances are responsible for the improved survival of patients with a variety of congenital heart diseases that lead to right HF. The most illustrative example is the Fontan procedure to palliate single-ventricle physiology. Unlike patients with acquired heart disease, these patients may develop "cardiac cirrhosis" in early adulthood.

This heterogeneous cause of CH together with the limited validated techniques available to diagnose and, specially, stage the disease may explain that the burden of CH has not yet been adequately described [51]. Non-congenital HF studies using liver blood tests to determine the prevalence of CH have described figures ranging from 15 to 80%, depending on the severity of heart disease [24, 52–57]. However, liver blood tests neither accurately diagnose CH nor reflect the stage of liver disease [51]. Future studies should use a more comprehensive approach to overcome these biases and to provide solid data on this issue.

#### **4.2 Pathophysiology**

Congestion produces liver damage through several pathogenic mechanisms: (1) increased sinusoidal pressure leads to hepatic stellate cell activation and decreases nitric oxide production by endothelial cells through shear stress, all of which induce sinusoidal ischemia and promote fibrogenesis [51, 58]; (2) decreased hepatic blood flow further aggravates liver ischemia. Portal venous inflow is reduced as a result of the transmission of the elevated central venous pressure to the sinusoidal network, while arterial flow can also be compromised in patients who also harbor a left-sided HF [8, 51]; (3) Accumulation of exudate into the space of Disse due to the existing congestion impairs diffusion of oxygen and nutrients to hepatocytes and accelerates fibrosis pathways [8]; (4) Sinusoidal stasis and congestion promote sinusoidal thrombosis, which in turn contributes to liver fibrosis by causing parenchymal extinction and by activating hepatic stellate cells via protease-activated receptors [59, 60]. The former refers to a hypothesis based on retrospective observations of ex-vivo human liver specimens of patients with CH. In this autopsy study, Wanless et al. demonstrated sinusoidal thrombi confined to areas of fibrosis, thereby suggesting that intrahepatic thrombosis is involved in liver fibrosis progression [61]. A recent experimental study provided evidence of the

mechanistic link between CH and liver fibrosis through this mechanism [58]. These findings settle the rational basis for testing anticoagulant drugs in patients with CH, but so far, no clinical trial has addressed this issue. In comparison, research in this area in primary liver cirrhosis is more advanced. Hence, several experimental studies have shown that anticoagulant therapy improves liver fibrosis and reduces portal hypertension [62–73], and a clinical trial demonstrated that anticoagulation led to a reduction in portal thrombosis and other complications of liver disease and to increase in survival [74]. New clinical trials are needed in order to confirm these preliminary results and to establish whether the stage of liver disease may influence its efficacy [75].

It must be highlighted that contrary to primary liver diseases, in CH inflammation seems to play no role in the progression of liver fibrosis. Indeed, several studies of patients with Fontan circulation demonstrated minimal inflammatory changes in liver biopsy specimens, despite accentuated hepatic fibrosis [76–78].

#### **4.3 Clinical presentation and diagnosis**

CH may be asymptomatic for a long time, and frequently, its presence is suspected through abnormalities in liver tests [8]. Symptoms attributed to CH may include dull right upper quadrant pain, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, early satiety, malaise, and mild jaundice [3]. The abdominal symptoms respond to the stretching of the liver capsule due to hepatic congestion and may occur in the absence of overt ascites or lower extremity edema. These symptoms, however, are usually masked by those related to right-sided HF [2].

Physical examination may often show hepatomegaly and signs of HF, including hepatojugular reflux and peripheral edema. A pulsatile liver may also be seen, and its loss suggests progression to cardiac cirrhosis [49]. Overt ascites is also a frequent finding, although it is rarely refractory. In a series of 83 patients with CH of whom only one had established cardiac cirrhosis, up to 57% had ascites. Moreover, ascites and edema had no relation to the extent of liver fibrosis, and therefore, they are due to elevated right-sided cardiac pressure hitting the sinusoidal network [50]. The differentiation of cardiac ascites from cirrhotic ascites can be cumbersome. In these conditions, the serum-ascites albumin gradient is ≥1.1 g/dL since they both respond to hepatic sinusoidal hypertension [79]. There are, however, some ascites findings that are useful to make a differential diagnosis. Cardiac ascites has higher protein levels (>2.5 g/dL). This is due to preserved liver synthetic function and absence of capillarization of the liver sinusoidal endothelial cells [3, 8, 80]. The latter refers to the lost of fenestrae and development of a basement membrane by these cells as a consequence of liver fibrosis. In cirrhosis, these features make hepatic sinusoids less leaky and prevent the passage of proteins to the space of Disse and from here to the peritoneal fluid [81]. Other less reliable findings in cardiac ascites are higher LDH levels and higher red blood cell counts due to leaking of red blood cells into the ascites via lymph tissue, with resulting lysis [80]. Despite these differences, a significant number of cases are still misclassified. Measurement of serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or of its inactive pro-hormone (N-terminal-proBNP) in serum and ascites has been recently suggested as an aid tool in uncertain cases. Thus, Sheer et al. reported that both serum and ascites NT-proBNP levels had high sensitivity and specificity in predicting HF as the cause of ascites [82]. More recently, Farias et al. found serum BNP to be superior to the total ascitic fluid protein concentration with regard to discriminating cardiac ascites from cirrhotic ascites. A serum BNP cutoff of >364 pg/mL had 98% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 99% diagnostic accuracy, and a positive likelihood ratio of 168.1 for the diagnosis of cardiac ascites. Conversely, a serum BNP cutoff of ≤182 pg/mL was excellent for ruling out ascites due to heart failure [79].

**69**

*4.3.2 Imaging tests*

*Cardiac Hepatopathy*

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

complicate its management [51].

causes of liver disease [49, 50].

aforementioned marked elevation of liver enzymes [8].

*4.3.1 Biochemical profile*

The differentiation of cardiac cirrhotic ascites from cardiac ascites without cirrhosis is especially challenging and of great clinical importance. On the one hand, the diagnosis of cardiac cirrhosis warrants further evaluations such as bi-annual surveillance ultrasonography or endoscopic screening for esophageal varices. On the other hand, its presence may preclude a heart transplant or require a combined heart-liver transplant. Apart from some diagnostic tools such as liver biopsy and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) that will be later discussed, there are some clinical clues that help in the differential diagnosis. In patients with cardiac ascites without cirrhosis, splenomegaly and spider angiomata are absent, and varices are rarely identified on upper endoscopy [3, 49]. This can be explained by the fact that varices represent collateral vessels from the high-pressure portal system to the low-pressure systemic circulation, and in CH without cirrhosis, no pressure gradient exists because pressure remains high along the entire path of venous return to the right atrium [50]. Complications of cirrhosis may occur in the late stages of cardiac cirrhosis. Although in the past the traditional patient with cardiac cirrhosis died from his cardiac disease before progressing to decompensated cirrhosis, advances in medical and surgical treatments are responsible for the increased number of liver complications in this setting [3]. The risk of hepatocarcinoma after the Fontan procedure is probably the best example. The success of this surgery to palliate right-sided congenital heart lesions permits longterm survival in the setting of elevated right-sided heart pressures. Eventually, the liver disease could become as clinically important as the cardiac disease and further

Besides the presence of right-sided HF (or other cause of high central pressures) and the aforementioned clinical findings, the diagnosis of CH should be further supported on compatible results of diagnostic tools and exclusion of other possible

Elevation of serum cholestasis markers (alkaline phosphatase, GGT, and bilirubin) is characteristic of CH. Total bilirubin levels rarely exceed 3 mg/dL, and indirect bilirubin usually predominates over direct bilirubin [3]. The degree of cholestasis is related to the severity of both the elevation of right atrial pressure and tricuspid regurgitation [55, 83]. These data suggest that elevated right-sided filling pressures may contribute more to LFT elevation than reduced cardiac output [2]. The mechanism of cholestasis in this setting is thought to be due to the compression of the bile canaliculi and small ductules by centrally congested sinusoids [25]. Other laboratory findings include mild elevations of serum aminotransferases to two to three times the upper limit of normal and mild hypoalbuminemia. The latter may also be secondary to malnutrition or protein-losing enteropathy [8]. As liver disease progresses, liver function tests (i.e., bilirubin, INR, and albumin) may continue to worsen. Importantly, liver enzymes are often normal, and in the presence of other findings suggestive of CH, this diagnosis cannot be ruled out based on these normal values [3]. As already discussed, CH predisposes the liver to ACLI in the face of hemodynamic instability, instigating the

Imaging tests help both to support the diagnosis of CH and to identify complica-

tions. Characteristic conventional imaging findings include dilation of inferior vena cava and hepatic veins, loss of normal triphasic hepatic venous wave-form, and abnormal kinetics of intravenous contrast enhancement (e.g., delayed bolus arrival to the liver suggesting slow systemic circulation, diffusion of extracellular

#### *Cardiac Hepatopathy DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

*Liver Pathology*

mechanistic link between CH and liver fibrosis through this mechanism [58]. These findings settle the rational basis for testing anticoagulant drugs in patients with CH, but so far, no clinical trial has addressed this issue. In comparison, research in this area in primary liver cirrhosis is more advanced. Hence, several experimental studies have shown that anticoagulant therapy improves liver fibrosis and reduces portal hypertension [62–73], and a clinical trial demonstrated that anticoagulation led to a reduction in portal thrombosis and other complications of liver disease and to increase in survival [74]. New clinical trials are needed in order to confirm these preliminary results and to

It must be highlighted that contrary to primary liver diseases, in CH inflammation seems to play no role in the progression of liver fibrosis. Indeed, several studies of patients with Fontan circulation demonstrated minimal inflammatory changes in

CH may be asymptomatic for a long time, and frequently, its presence is suspected through abnormalities in liver tests [8]. Symptoms attributed to CH may include dull right upper quadrant pain, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, early satiety, malaise, and mild jaundice [3]. The abdominal symptoms respond to the stretching of the liver capsule due to hepatic congestion and may occur in the absence of overt ascites or lower extremity edema. These symptoms, however, are usually masked by

Physical examination may often show hepatomegaly and signs of HF, including hepatojugular reflux and peripheral edema. A pulsatile liver may also be seen, and its loss suggests progression to cardiac cirrhosis [49]. Overt ascites is also a frequent finding, although it is rarely refractory. In a series of 83 patients with CH of whom only one had established cardiac cirrhosis, up to 57% had ascites. Moreover, ascites and edema had no relation to the extent of liver fibrosis, and therefore, they are due to elevated right-sided cardiac pressure hitting the sinusoidal network [50]. The differentiation of cardiac ascites from cirrhotic ascites can be cumbersome. In these conditions, the serum-ascites albumin gradient is ≥1.1 g/dL since they both respond to hepatic sinusoidal hypertension [79]. There are, however, some ascites findings that are useful to make a differential diagnosis. Cardiac ascites has higher protein levels (>2.5 g/dL). This is due to preserved liver synthetic function and absence of capillarization of the liver sinusoidal endothelial cells [3, 8, 80]. The latter refers to the lost of fenestrae and development of a basement membrane by these cells as a consequence of liver fibrosis. In cirrhosis, these features make hepatic sinusoids less leaky and prevent the passage of proteins to the space of Disse and from here to the peritoneal fluid [81]. Other less reliable findings in cardiac ascites are higher LDH levels and higher red blood cell counts due to leaking of red blood cells into the ascites via lymph tissue, with resulting lysis [80]. Despite these differences, a significant number of cases are still misclassified. Measurement of serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or of its inactive pro-hormone (N-terminal-proBNP) in serum and ascites has been recently suggested as an aid tool in uncertain cases. Thus, Sheer et al. reported that both serum and ascites NT-proBNP levels had high sensitivity and specificity in predicting HF as the cause of ascites [82]. More recently, Farias et al. found serum BNP to be superior to the total ascitic fluid protein concentration with regard to discriminating cardiac ascites from cirrhotic ascites. A serum BNP cutoff of >364 pg/mL had 98% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 99% diagnostic accuracy, and a positive likelihood ratio of 168.1 for the diagnosis of cardiac ascites. Conversely, a serum BNP cutoff of ≤182 pg/mL was excellent for

establish whether the stage of liver disease may influence its efficacy [75].

liver biopsy specimens, despite accentuated hepatic fibrosis [76–78].

**4.3 Clinical presentation and diagnosis**

those related to right-sided HF [2].

ruling out ascites due to heart failure [79].

**68**

The differentiation of cardiac cirrhotic ascites from cardiac ascites without cirrhosis is especially challenging and of great clinical importance. On the one hand, the diagnosis of cardiac cirrhosis warrants further evaluations such as bi-annual surveillance ultrasonography or endoscopic screening for esophageal varices. On the other hand, its presence may preclude a heart transplant or require a combined heart-liver transplant. Apart from some diagnostic tools such as liver biopsy and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) that will be later discussed, there are some clinical clues that help in the differential diagnosis. In patients with cardiac ascites without cirrhosis, splenomegaly and spider angiomata are absent, and varices are rarely identified on upper endoscopy [3, 49]. This can be explained by the fact that varices represent collateral vessels from the high-pressure portal system to the low-pressure systemic circulation, and in CH without cirrhosis, no pressure gradient exists because pressure remains high along the entire path of venous return to the right atrium [50]. Complications of cirrhosis may occur in the late stages of cardiac cirrhosis. Although in the past the traditional patient with cardiac cirrhosis died from his cardiac disease before progressing to decompensated cirrhosis, advances in medical and surgical treatments are responsible for the increased number of liver complications in this setting [3]. The risk of hepatocarcinoma after the Fontan procedure is probably the best example. The success of this surgery to palliate right-sided congenital heart lesions permits longterm survival in the setting of elevated right-sided heart pressures. Eventually, the liver disease could become as clinically important as the cardiac disease and further complicate its management [51].

Besides the presence of right-sided HF (or other cause of high central pressures) and the aforementioned clinical findings, the diagnosis of CH should be further supported on compatible results of diagnostic tools and exclusion of other possible causes of liver disease [49, 50].

#### *4.3.1 Biochemical profile*

Elevation of serum cholestasis markers (alkaline phosphatase, GGT, and bilirubin) is characteristic of CH. Total bilirubin levels rarely exceed 3 mg/dL, and indirect bilirubin usually predominates over direct bilirubin [3]. The degree of cholestasis is related to the severity of both the elevation of right atrial pressure and tricuspid regurgitation [55, 83]. These data suggest that elevated right-sided filling pressures may contribute more to LFT elevation than reduced cardiac output [2]. The mechanism of cholestasis in this setting is thought to be due to the compression of the bile canaliculi and small ductules by centrally congested sinusoids [25]. Other laboratory findings include mild elevations of serum aminotransferases to two to three times the upper limit of normal and mild hypoalbuminemia. The latter may also be secondary to malnutrition or protein-losing enteropathy [8]. As liver disease progresses, liver function tests (i.e., bilirubin, INR, and albumin) may continue to worsen. Importantly, liver enzymes are often normal, and in the presence of other findings suggestive of CH, this diagnosis cannot be ruled out based on these normal values [3]. As already discussed, CH predisposes the liver to ACLI in the face of hemodynamic instability, instigating the aforementioned marked elevation of liver enzymes [8].

#### *4.3.2 Imaging tests*

Imaging tests help both to support the diagnosis of CH and to identify complications. Characteristic conventional imaging findings include dilation of inferior vena cava and hepatic veins, loss of normal triphasic hepatic venous wave-form, and abnormal kinetics of intravenous contrast enhancement (e.g., delayed bolus arrival to the liver suggesting slow systemic circulation, diffusion of extracellular

contrast media into the periportal lymphatic space in the delayed phase, retrograde hepatic venous opacification during the early phase of intravenous contrast material injection into the upper extremities, and a predominantly peripheral heterogeneous pattern of hepatic enhancement due to stagnant blood flow) [84] (**Figure 3A**, **B**). Importantly, the appearance of a nodular or heterogeneous liver on standard imaging is not sufficient to diagnosis cirrhosis in CH [51].

CH may lead to the generation of benign regenerative nodules or focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH)-like lesions and hepatocarcinoma. The former is referred to as "FNH-like" despite having characteristic pathological findings of FNH due to the presence of abnormal background liver parenchyma. Although they most commonly demonstrate typical imaging findings (i.e., well-circumscribed, homogeneous nodule with late arterial hyperenhancement that fades to isointensity/ isoattenuation on delayed phase imaging), they sometimes have a washout appearance that could be mistaken for hepatocarcinoma due to abnormally increased background parenchymal enhancement in the delayed phase [84] (**Figure 4**). Indeed, distinguishing hepatocarcinoma from these atypical imaging represents an unmet need, and biopsy is frequently required for accurate diagnosis. Radiological findings that support the diagnosis of hepatocarcinoma include the following: significant change in appearance of a nodule, venous invasion, a heterogeneousappearing mass, and elevated alpha-fetoprotein [51, 84]. There are currently no screening guidelines for hepatocarcinoma in CH. In post-Fontan patients, some experts recommend to begin screening at 15–20 years after the operation [51], while the newly released guidelines from the American Heart Association recommend a much more comprehensive surveillance (**Table 1**) [85]. In patients with CH due to other conditions, it seems reasonable to perform bi-annual screening once cardiac cirrhosis is established.

#### *4.3.3 Histology*

The congestive liver explant has been characterized as a "nutmeg liver" due to the presence of dark centrilobular zones that reflect sinusoidal congestion alternating with pale periportal zones with normal or fatty liver tissue [84] (**Figure 5A**). Characteristic histological findings include sinusoidal dilatation and congestion, hepatocyte atrophy most prominent in zone 3, extravasation of red blood cells into the space of Disse, regenerative hyperplasia emerging from periportal regions, and

#### **Figure 3.**

*(A) Idiopathic membranous inferior vena cava obstruction in a 44-year-old man. MRI shows a mildly nodular liver with altered parenchymal perfusion and dilatation of hepatic veins. (B) Severe tricuspid regurgitation in a 49-year-old man. CT scan shows dilatation of hepatic veins and reflux of contrast into the inferior vena cava and hepatic veins.*

**71**

**Figure 4.**

*hyperplasia.*

*Cardiac Hepatopathy*

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

centrilobular fibrosis (**Figure 5B**, **C**) [25]. The degree of sinusoidal dilatation is positively correlated with the degree of elevation of right atrial pressure. As liver disease progresses, bridging fibrosis typically extends between central veins to produce a pattern that has been name "reversed lobulation" since it contrasts to the typical fibrosis pattern found in most primary liver diseases where bridging fibrosis occurs between portal triads (i.e., zone 1) [3]. As far as the correlation between fibrosis extension and systemic hemodynamic parameters is concerned, there are discordant results with most studies finding no correlation [50, 54, 86–89].

*Idiopathic membranous inferior vena cava obstruction in a 44-year-old man. The image shows the dynamic phase of MRI. Besides the significant hypertrophy of segment I, MRI shows a mass (3.8 cm × 4.2 cm) that after administration of intravenous contrast presents a heterogeneous enhancement in the arterial phase with washout in the portal phase. Liver biopsy showed histological changes compatible with focal nodular* 

It must be highlighted that the distribution of fibrosis throughout the liver is extremely heterogeneous in patients with CH [86, 90], and it may be explained by the fibrogenic effects of intrahepatic thrombosis caused by static blood flow [61]. This variability raises concern about sampling error and about the role of liver biopsy as the gold standard tool for fibrosis assessment. Moreover, liver biopsies may not predict post-heart transplant outcomes. In a retrospective study, Louie et al. found that the presence of bridging fibrosis was not significantly associated with post-operative survival or post-operative liver failure, based on which they concluded that patients with bridging fibrosis may still be considered viable

*Liver Pathology*

cirrhosis is established.

*4.3.3 Histology*

contrast media into the periportal lymphatic space in the delayed phase, retrograde hepatic venous opacification during the early phase of intravenous contrast material injection into the upper extremities, and a predominantly peripheral heterogeneous pattern of hepatic enhancement due to stagnant blood flow) [84] (**Figure 3A**, **B**). Importantly, the appearance of a nodular or heterogeneous liver on standard imag-

CH may lead to the generation of benign regenerative nodules or focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH)-like lesions and hepatocarcinoma. The former is referred to as "FNH-like" despite having characteristic pathological findings of FNH due to the presence of abnormal background liver parenchyma. Although they most commonly demonstrate typical imaging findings (i.e., well-circumscribed, homogeneous nodule with late arterial hyperenhancement that fades to isointensity/ isoattenuation on delayed phase imaging), they sometimes have a washout appearance that could be mistaken for hepatocarcinoma due to abnormally increased background parenchymal enhancement in the delayed phase [84] (**Figure 4**). Indeed, distinguishing hepatocarcinoma from these atypical imaging represents an unmet need, and biopsy is frequently required for accurate diagnosis. Radiological findings that support the diagnosis of hepatocarcinoma include the following: significant change in appearance of a nodule, venous invasion, a heterogeneousappearing mass, and elevated alpha-fetoprotein [51, 84]. There are currently no screening guidelines for hepatocarcinoma in CH. In post-Fontan patients, some experts recommend to begin screening at 15–20 years after the operation [51], while the newly released guidelines from the American Heart Association recommend a much more comprehensive surveillance (**Table 1**) [85]. In patients with CH due to other conditions, it seems reasonable to perform bi-annual screening once cardiac

The congestive liver explant has been characterized as a "nutmeg liver" due to the presence of dark centrilobular zones that reflect sinusoidal congestion alternating with pale periportal zones with normal or fatty liver tissue [84] (**Figure 5A**). Characteristic histological findings include sinusoidal dilatation and congestion, hepatocyte atrophy most prominent in zone 3, extravasation of red blood cells into the space of Disse, regenerative hyperplasia emerging from periportal regions, and

*(A) Idiopathic membranous inferior vena cava obstruction in a 44-year-old man. MRI shows a mildly nodular liver with altered parenchymal perfusion and dilatation of hepatic veins. (B) Severe tricuspid regurgitation in a 49-year-old man. CT scan shows dilatation of hepatic veins and reflux of contrast into the inferior vena cava* 

ing is not sufficient to diagnosis cirrhosis in CH [51].

**70**

**Figure 3.**

*and hepatic veins.*

#### **Figure 4.**

*Idiopathic membranous inferior vena cava obstruction in a 44-year-old man. The image shows the dynamic phase of MRI. Besides the significant hypertrophy of segment I, MRI shows a mass (3.8 cm × 4.2 cm) that after administration of intravenous contrast presents a heterogeneous enhancement in the arterial phase with washout in the portal phase. Liver biopsy showed histological changes compatible with focal nodular hyperplasia.*

centrilobular fibrosis (**Figure 5B**, **C**) [25]. The degree of sinusoidal dilatation is positively correlated with the degree of elevation of right atrial pressure. As liver disease progresses, bridging fibrosis typically extends between central veins to produce a pattern that has been name "reversed lobulation" since it contrasts to the typical fibrosis pattern found in most primary liver diseases where bridging fibrosis occurs between portal triads (i.e., zone 1) [3]. As far as the correlation between fibrosis extension and systemic hemodynamic parameters is concerned, there are discordant results with most studies finding no correlation [50, 54, 86–89].

It must be highlighted that the distribution of fibrosis throughout the liver is extremely heterogeneous in patients with CH [86, 90], and it may be explained by the fibrogenic effects of intrahepatic thrombosis caused by static blood flow [61]. This variability raises concern about sampling error and about the role of liver biopsy as the gold standard tool for fibrosis assessment. Moreover, liver biopsies may not predict post-heart transplant outcomes. In a retrospective study, Louie et al. found that the presence of bridging fibrosis was not significantly associated with post-operative survival or post-operative liver failure, based on which they concluded that patients with bridging fibrosis may still be considered viable


*Tests are stratified as basic (fundamental and rudimentary level of assessment), in-depth (more detailed level of characterization), and investigational (possible or likely of value; however, greater experience and study may be necessary before widespread use can be suggested).*

*Abbreviations: CMP: comprehensive metabolic panel; CT: computed tomography; GGT: γ-glutamyl transferase; INR: international normalized ratio; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; PT: prothrombin time.*

#### **Table 1.**

*Tests recommended by the American Heart Association for surveillance of liver disease in post-Fontan patients.*

candidates for isolated heart transplantation [90]. Similar results were described by Dhall et al. [86]. Regardless of these limitations, liver biopsy still plays an important role in the assessment of the stage of liver disease, in ruling out hepatocarcinoma and alternative etiologies of liver disease and in determining candidacy for isolated heart transplantation or combined heart-liver transplantation. Its findings, however, should be correlated with the clinical presentation and results of other diagnostic tools [51, 86].

#### *4.3.4 Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis*

Non-invasive diagnostic tests of liver fibrosis have been extensively studied and have excellent predictive value for advanced fibrosis in patients with viral hepatitis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [91]. Nevertheless, the performance of these tests in assessing the severity of fibrosis in CH is poor. A detail description of each of these tests in this setting is beyond the scope of this chapter and can be found elsewhere [51, 92, 93].

Briefly, among serological markers, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-XI score has been suggested to be potentially useful as some studies have

**73**

*Cardiac Hepatopathy*

**Figure 5.**

*greater magnification.*

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

shown a moderate correlation with the stage of fibrosis in post-Fontan patients [94, 95]. This score excludes INR given the high prevalence of anticoagulation use in CH. Despite these results, further studies are needed as other studies have described opposite results [78, 90]. The remaining tests (i.e., standard serum markers, FibroSure testing, hyaluronic acid levels, and most clinical risk calculators) are inaccurate at staging liver fibrosis [51]. The use of liver stiffness tools is hampered by the fact that congestion increases liver stiffness values [91]. Hence, in CH, it provides unreliable information regarding the grade of fibrosis, although some evidence suggests that liver and spleen stiffness calculated by magnetic resonance elastography may be more accurate. Finally, new advances in imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging, may poten-

*(A) Postmortem example of the classical "nutmeg" liver with centrilobular congestion in CH. (B) Centrilobular regions show congestion and extravasation of red blood cells. (C) Same findings than 5.B with* 

tially differentiate fibrosis from congestion but require validation [51].

decompensated cirrhosis due to primary liver diseases [96–98].

Hepatic vein catheterization with measurement of the HVPG is currently the gold standard technique for determining portal pressure. It represents the difference between the wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) and the free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP). The WHVP is usually measured by occluding the right hepatic vein through the inflation of a balloon, whereas the FHVP is measured without occluding it. The occlusion of the vein forms a continuous static column of blood between the catheter and the hepatic sinusoids. Thus, WHVP measures sinusoidal pressure. Due to the scarce connections between sinusoids existing in cirrhosis, pressure cannot be decompressed through the sinusoidal network, and therefore, WHVP reflects portal pressure in this setting. FHVP, on the other hand, is a surrogate for inferior vena cava pressure. Normal values of HVPG are <5 mmHg. The HVPG is a strong and independent predictor of outcomes in compensated and

*4.3.5 Hepatic hemodynamic study*

#### **Figure 5.**

*Liver Pathology*

**Childhood** (every 3–4 years)

**Adolescence** (every 1–3 years)

**Adulthood** (every 1–2 years)

*\**

**Table 1.**

• CMP • Platelet count • Serum GGT

• CMP • Platelet count • Serum GGT • PT/INR

• CMP • Platelet count • Serum GGT • PT/INR • Total serum cholesterol • Abdominal ultrasound

*necessary before widespread use can be suggested).*

**72**

diagnostic tools [51, 86].

elsewhere [51, 92, 93].

*4.3.4 Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis*

candidates for isolated heart transplantation [90]. Similar results were described by Dhall et al. [86]. Regardless of these limitations, liver biopsy still plays an important role in the assessment of the stage of liver disease, in ruling out hepatocarcinoma and alternative etiologies of liver disease and in determining candidacy for isolated heart transplantation or combined heart-liver transplantation. Its findings, however, should be correlated with the clinical presentation and results of other

*Tests recommended by the American Heart Association for surveillance of liver disease in post-Fontan patients.*

**Basic\* In-Depth\* Investigational\***

• Liver imaging via CT or

• Liver elastography (ultrasound or MRI)

• Liver biopsy

• Liver biopsy

• Liver biopsy

MRI

• Serum FibroSure biomarkers • Serum α-fetoprotein • Abdominal ultrasound • Total serum cholesterol

• Serum FibroSure biomarkers • Serum α-fetoprotein • Abdominal ultrasound • Total serum cholesterol • Liver imaging via CT

or MRI

or MRI

*Tests are stratified as basic (fundamental and rudimentary level of assessment), in-depth (more detailed level of characterization), and investigational (possible or likely of value; however, greater experience and study may be* 

*Abbreviations: CMP: comprehensive metabolic panel; CT: computed tomography; GGT: γ-glutamyl transferase; INR:* 

*international normalized ratio; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; PT: prothrombin time.*

• Liver elastography (ultrasound or MRI)

• Serum FibroSure biomarkers • Serum α-fetoprotein • Liver imaging via CT

• Liver elastography (ultrasound or MRI)

• PT/INR

Non-invasive diagnostic tests of liver fibrosis have been extensively studied and have excellent predictive value for advanced fibrosis in patients with viral hepatitis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [91]. Nevertheless, the performance of these tests in assessing the severity of fibrosis in CH is poor. A detail description of each of these tests in this setting is beyond the scope of this chapter and can be found

Briefly, among serological markers, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-XI score has been suggested to be potentially useful as some studies have *(A) Postmortem example of the classical "nutmeg" liver with centrilobular congestion in CH. (B) Centrilobular regions show congestion and extravasation of red blood cells. (C) Same findings than 5.B with greater magnification.*

shown a moderate correlation with the stage of fibrosis in post-Fontan patients [94, 95]. This score excludes INR given the high prevalence of anticoagulation use in CH. Despite these results, further studies are needed as other studies have described opposite results [78, 90]. The remaining tests (i.e., standard serum markers, FibroSure testing, hyaluronic acid levels, and most clinical risk calculators) are inaccurate at staging liver fibrosis [51]. The use of liver stiffness tools is hampered by the fact that congestion increases liver stiffness values [91]. Hence, in CH, it provides unreliable information regarding the grade of fibrosis, although some evidence suggests that liver and spleen stiffness calculated by magnetic resonance elastography may be more accurate. Finally, new advances in imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging, may potentially differentiate fibrosis from congestion but require validation [51].

#### *4.3.5 Hepatic hemodynamic study*

Hepatic vein catheterization with measurement of the HVPG is currently the gold standard technique for determining portal pressure. It represents the difference between the wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) and the free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP). The WHVP is usually measured by occluding the right hepatic vein through the inflation of a balloon, whereas the FHVP is measured without occluding it. The occlusion of the vein forms a continuous static column of blood between the catheter and the hepatic sinusoids. Thus, WHVP measures sinusoidal pressure. Due to the scarce connections between sinusoids existing in cirrhosis, pressure cannot be decompressed through the sinusoidal network, and therefore, WHVP reflects portal pressure in this setting. FHVP, on the other hand, is a surrogate for inferior vena cava pressure. Normal values of HVPG are <5 mmHg. The HVPG is a strong and independent predictor of outcomes in compensated and decompensated cirrhosis due to primary liver diseases [96–98].

The diagnostic and prognostic value of HVPG measurement in CH has not been adequately assessed. In this context, both FHVP and WHPV are elevated, and the HVPG is within the normal range (**Figure 6**). Once cardiac cirrhosis is established, the HVPG is expected to increase beyond 6 mmHg (**Figure 7**) [51]. Hence, HVPG could theoretically provide relevant information about the stage of CH. The few clinical studies that have provided hemodynamic data in this regard have described inconsistent results. For instance, in the study of Myers et al., esophageal varices were seen in some patients despite having a HVPG below 6 mmHg. As previously explained, the high pressures along the entire path of venous return to the right atrium prevent the formation of varices unless the establishment of cirrhosis creates a pressure gradient between the portal and systemic circulation. In order to explain these discordant results, the same authors argued that it was possible that the varices observed in a few patients represented either false-positive endoscopies or undetected concomitant disease such as portal vein thrombosis [50]. Moreover, it has not yet been demonstrated that the HVPG correlates with the stage of fibrosis in CH [50, 86]. These findings probably respond to several confounders: the inclusion of few patients with advanced fibrosis, the variable distribution of fibrosis throughout the liver, and the absence of a full and reliable characterization of the liver disease. As far as its prognostic utility is concerned, no study has evaluated the HVPG for predicting hepatic decompensation events and survival after isolated heart transplantation [51]. Despite this, many academic centers, including our own, measure the HVPG to assist in the transplant decision-making process. Finally, it must be reminded that the hepatic vein catheterization also allows performing a transjugular liver biopsy. This technique is safer than the percutaneous biopsy and can be performed even under anticoagulation or ascites [99].

#### **Figure 6.**

*(A) A typical hemodynamic tracing of a patient with congestive hepatopathy due to cor pulmonale. The HVPG is calculated as the difference between WHVP and FHVP. Both of them are elevated, but the HVPG is within the normal range. (B) Transjugular liver biopsy was performed and showed sinusoidal dilatation without significant fibrosis (hematoxylin-eosin stain; the image of Masson stain is not shown). (C) Occlusion of the hepatic vein with the balloon catheter. Abbreviations: MAP: Mean pulmonary arterial pressure; PCP: Pulmonary capillary pressure; RAP: Right atrial pressure; IVCP: Inferior vena cava pressure; FHVP: Free hepatic venous pressure; WHVP: Wedged hepatic venous pressure; HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient.*

**75**

*Cardiac Hepatopathy*

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

**4.4 Prognosis and treatment**

*HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient.*

**Figure 7.**

not been clearly established [6].

tolerate a heart transplant.

The underlying cardiac disease generally determines prognosis in CH. Liver enzymes (i.e., bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, GGT, and albumin) and scores such as the MELD and MELD-XI have been associated with prognosis in HF patients [53, 56, 100–103]. Based on these findings, both the American College of Cardiology and the European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Guidelines recommend the inclusion of liver function tests in the diagnostic workup of all patients presenting with HF [1, 104]. However, it must be pointed out that they predict cardiac or overall mortality, not liver-related mortality. Therefore, they seem to act as indirect markers of the severity of cardiac disease rather than reflecting the effect of liver disease on outcomes. Indeed, the effect of cardiac cirrhosis on overall prognosis has

*(A) A typical hemodynamic tracing of a patient with severe tricuspid regurgitation and concomitant hepatitis C. The HVPG is calculated as the difference between WHVP and FHVP. Both of them are elevated, and the HVPG is slightly elevated. (B) Transjugular liver biopsy was performed and showed significant fibrosis forming nodules (Masson stain). (C) Occlusion of the hepatic vein with the balloon catheter. Abbreviations: MAP: Mean pulmonary arterial pressure; PCP: Pulmonary capillary pressure; RAP: Right atrial pressure; IVCP: Inferior vena cava pressure; FHVP: Free hepatic venous pressure; WHVP: Wedged hepatic venous pressure;* 

Management of the underlying cardiac disease is the mainstay of treatment. There is no specific therapy of CH [8]. Concerns about modification of drug dosage have been raised, although there are no solid rules in this regard. This is partially explained by the lack of correlation of available diagnostic tools with the hepatic function [5]. Theoretically more relevant are the detrimental effects that some of the medical therapies used to treat HF may have on the physiopathology of cirrhosis. For instance, vasodilators such as angiotensin-convertingenzyme inhibitors are contraindicated in decompensated cirrhosis, and doses of diuretics in HF are often higher than in cirrhosis and may precipitate hepatorenal syndrome [3]. Again, no solid recommendations are available, and treatment modifications should be patient-specific. Eventually, some patients will require a heart transplant, and this poses the question of whether the liver is "in shape" to

#### *Cardiac Hepatopathy DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

#### **Figure 7.**

*Liver Pathology*

**74**

**Figure 6.**

*(A) A typical hemodynamic tracing of a patient with congestive hepatopathy due to cor pulmonale. The HVPG is calculated as the difference between WHVP and FHVP. Both of them are elevated, but the HVPG is within the normal range. (B) Transjugular liver biopsy was performed and showed sinusoidal dilatation without significant fibrosis (hematoxylin-eosin stain; the image of Masson stain is not shown). (C) Occlusion of the hepatic vein with the balloon catheter. Abbreviations: MAP: Mean pulmonary arterial pressure; PCP: Pulmonary capillary pressure; RAP: Right atrial pressure; IVCP: Inferior vena cava pressure; FHVP: Free hepatic venous pressure; WHVP: Wedged hepatic venous pressure; HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient.*

can be performed even under anticoagulation or ascites [99].

The diagnostic and prognostic value of HVPG measurement in CH has not been adequately assessed. In this context, both FHVP and WHPV are elevated, and the HVPG is within the normal range (**Figure 6**). Once cardiac cirrhosis is established, the HVPG is expected to increase beyond 6 mmHg (**Figure 7**) [51]. Hence, HVPG could theoretically provide relevant information about the stage of CH. The few clinical studies that have provided hemodynamic data in this regard have described inconsistent results. For instance, in the study of Myers et al., esophageal varices were seen in some patients despite having a HVPG below 6 mmHg. As previously explained, the high pressures along the entire path of venous return to the right atrium prevent the formation of varices unless the establishment of cirrhosis creates a pressure gradient between the portal and systemic circulation. In order to explain these discordant results, the same authors argued that it was possible that the varices observed in a few patients represented either false-positive endoscopies or undetected concomitant disease such as portal vein thrombosis [50]. Moreover, it has not yet been demonstrated that the HVPG correlates with the stage of fibrosis in CH [50, 86]. These findings probably respond to several confounders: the inclusion of few patients with advanced fibrosis, the variable distribution of fibrosis throughout the liver, and the absence of a full and reliable characterization of the liver disease. As far as its prognostic utility is concerned, no study has evaluated the HVPG for predicting hepatic decompensation events and survival after isolated heart transplantation [51]. Despite this, many academic centers, including our own, measure the HVPG to assist in the transplant decision-making process. Finally, it must be reminded that the hepatic vein catheterization also allows performing a transjugular liver biopsy. This technique is safer than the percutaneous biopsy and

*(A) A typical hemodynamic tracing of a patient with severe tricuspid regurgitation and concomitant hepatitis C. The HVPG is calculated as the difference between WHVP and FHVP. Both of them are elevated, and the HVPG is slightly elevated. (B) Transjugular liver biopsy was performed and showed significant fibrosis forming nodules (Masson stain). (C) Occlusion of the hepatic vein with the balloon catheter. Abbreviations: MAP: Mean pulmonary arterial pressure; PCP: Pulmonary capillary pressure; RAP: Right atrial pressure; IVCP: Inferior vena cava pressure; FHVP: Free hepatic venous pressure; WHVP: Wedged hepatic venous pressure; HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient.*

#### **4.4 Prognosis and treatment**

The underlying cardiac disease generally determines prognosis in CH. Liver enzymes (i.e., bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, GGT, and albumin) and scores such as the MELD and MELD-XI have been associated with prognosis in HF patients [53, 56, 100–103]. Based on these findings, both the American College of Cardiology and the European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Guidelines recommend the inclusion of liver function tests in the diagnostic workup of all patients presenting with HF [1, 104]. However, it must be pointed out that they predict cardiac or overall mortality, not liver-related mortality. Therefore, they seem to act as indirect markers of the severity of cardiac disease rather than reflecting the effect of liver disease on outcomes. Indeed, the effect of cardiac cirrhosis on overall prognosis has not been clearly established [6].

Management of the underlying cardiac disease is the mainstay of treatment. There is no specific therapy of CH [8]. Concerns about modification of drug dosage have been raised, although there are no solid rules in this regard. This is partially explained by the lack of correlation of available diagnostic tools with the hepatic function [5]. Theoretically more relevant are the detrimental effects that some of the medical therapies used to treat HF may have on the physiopathology of cirrhosis. For instance, vasodilators such as angiotensin-convertingenzyme inhibitors are contraindicated in decompensated cirrhosis, and doses of diuretics in HF are often higher than in cirrhosis and may precipitate hepatorenal syndrome [3]. Again, no solid recommendations are available, and treatment modifications should be patient-specific. Eventually, some patients will require a heart transplant, and this poses the question of whether the liver is "in shape" to tolerate a heart transplant.

#### **Figure 8.**

*Protocol to determine the recommendation regarding liver disease in a potential candidate for a heart transplant when CH is suspected. We proceed to HVPG measurement and transjugular biopsy in those patients in whom advanced liver disease cannot be ruled out after the initial evaluation (e.g., nodular appearance of the liver). Our recommendation is hemodynamic-dependent, regardless of the fibrosis stage. In cases with a HVPG below 5 mmHg, there is no contraindication to perform an isolated heart transplant, whereas a HVPG >10 mmHg discards it (no combined heart-liver transplantation has been performed so far in our hospital). In patients with a concomitant primary liver disease and a HVPG between 6 and 10 mmHg, the decision is patient-specific and relies mainly on the type of disease. If it is treatable (e.g., hepatitis C or B), we recommend proceeding with the heart transplant. Same recommendation is given in the absence of a primary liver disease and a HVPG between 6 and 10 mmHg. Abbreviations: CT: Computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient.*

#### **4.5 Determining candidacy for heart transplantation**

Given the aforementioned limitations of available invasive and non-invasive tests to assess hepatic fibrosis and function, determining whether a patient with CH is a candidate for isolated heart transplantation or may require a combined heartliver transplantation is especially challenging. Not surprisingly, there are no official guidelines, evaluation is institution dependent, and the decision is often taken on a case-by-case basis. It must be highlighted that cardiac cirrhosis may be reversed after heart transplantation. Based on this premise, some centers use an HVPG value of <12 mmHg as a cutoff for offering isolated heart transplantation instead of combined heart-liver transplantation. Nevertheless, this protocol requires validation before its widespread use in clinical practice. **Figure 8** shows our protocol for determining our recommendation regarding liver disease in a potential candidate for a heart transplant when CH is suspected.

#### **5. Take-home messages and pitfalls facing management**


**77**

*Cardiac Hepatopathy*

valvular disease.

right-sided HF.

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

progression of liver fibrosis in CH.

to the abnormal background liver parenchyma.

evidence in this regard has been published so far.

and treatment is focused on the latter.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

**Conflict of interest**

produce a "reversed lobulation" pattern.

• Diagnosis of ACLI can be suspected based on the following analytical alterations: ALT-to-LDH ratio <1.5, AST higher than ALT at initial phase, and an early and sharp deterioration in prothrombin activity and renal function.

• The current spectrum of CH differs from earlier reports with HF due to ischemic cardiomyopathy and congenital heart disease having surpassed rheumatic

• Contrary to primary liver diseases, inflammation seems to play no role in the

• The clinical picture of CH is usually masked by symptoms and signs related to

• The diagnosis of cardiac cirrhosis warrants further evaluations such as bi-annual surveillance ultrasonography or endoscopic screening for esophageal varices.

• CH may lead to the generation of benign regenerative nodules and hepatocarcinoma. Distinguishing one from the other frequently requires a liver biopsy due

• In contrast to most primary liver diseases where bridging fibrosis occurs between portal triads, in CH it typically extends between central veins to

• The distribution of fibrosis throughout the liver is extremely heterogeneous in CH leading to sampling error. Moreover, fibrosis stage determined by liver

• The performance of non-invasive diagnostic tests of liver fibrosis in CH is poor.

• In both ACLI and CH, the prognosis is dependent on the underlying condition,

• HVPG measurement might be a useful tool for assessing the stage of CH and helps in the decision-making process of transplant candidacy. However, no

biopsies does not seem to predict post-heart transplant outcomes.

• There are some ascites findings that help differentiate cardiac ascites from cirrhotic ascites: higher protein (>2.5 g/dL) and LDH levels, and higher red blood cell counts. Serum BNP also seems to be a useful tool in this regard.

*Liver Pathology*

**Figure 8.**

*imaging; HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient.*

for a heart transplant when CH is suspected.

liver to hypoxic damage.

**5. Take-home messages and pitfalls facing management**

**4.5 Determining candidacy for heart transplantation**

*Protocol to determine the recommendation regarding liver disease in a potential candidate for a heart transplant when CH is suspected. We proceed to HVPG measurement and transjugular biopsy in those patients in whom advanced liver disease cannot be ruled out after the initial evaluation (e.g., nodular appearance of the liver). Our recommendation is hemodynamic-dependent, regardless of the fibrosis stage. In cases with a HVPG below 5 mmHg, there is no contraindication to perform an isolated heart transplant, whereas a HVPG >10 mmHg discards it (no combined heart-liver transplantation has been performed so far in our hospital). In patients with a concomitant primary liver disease and a HVPG between 6 and 10 mmHg, the decision is patient-specific and relies mainly on the type of disease. If it is treatable (e.g., hepatitis C or B), we recommend proceeding with the heart transplant. Same recommendation is given in the absence of a primary liver disease and a HVPG between 6 and 10 mmHg. Abbreviations: CT: Computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance* 

Given the aforementioned limitations of available invasive and non-invasive tests to assess hepatic fibrosis and function, determining whether a patient with CH is a candidate for isolated heart transplantation or may require a combined heartliver transplantation is especially challenging. Not surprisingly, there are no official guidelines, evaluation is institution dependent, and the decision is often taken on a case-by-case basis. It must be highlighted that cardiac cirrhosis may be reversed after heart transplantation. Based on this premise, some centers use an HVPG value of <12 mmHg as a cutoff for offering isolated heart transplantation instead of combined heart-liver transplantation. Nevertheless, this protocol requires validation before its widespread use in clinical practice. **Figure 8** shows our protocol for determining our recommendation regarding liver disease in a potential candidate

• The diagnosis of ACLI cannot be rejected because of the absence of shock and of signs of HF, and in case of uncertainty, a cardiac evaluation is warranted.

• CH is frequently observed in patients suffering ACLI since it predisposes the

**76**


## **Conflict of interest**

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

#### **Author details**

Jose Ignacio Fortea1,2,3, Ángela Puente1,2,3, Antonio Cuadrado1,2,3, Patricia Huelin1,2,3, Inés García1 , Marta Mayorga4 , Raul Pellon5 , Javier Crespo1,2,3 and Emilio Fábrega1,2,3\*

1 Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain

2 Infection, Immunity and Digestive Pathology Group, Research Institute Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain

3 Network Center for Biomedical Research in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain

4 Pathological Anatomy Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain

5 Radiology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain

\*Address all correspondence to: digfge@humv.es

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**79**

*Cardiac Hepatopathy*

**References**

2016;**18**:891-975

2013;**61**:2397-2405

2015;**29**:33-37

2014;**6**:41-54

2015;**26**:197-203

2016;**8**:68-71

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

[1] Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the heart failure association (HFA) of the ESC. European Journal of Heart Failure.

in the CCl-cirrhotic liver. Liver International. 2010;**30**:988-994

1977;**73**:1163-1169

1969;**24**:279-284

1901;**6**:264-80.7

1957;**99**:556-568

[11] Jacobsen KR, Ranek L,

[10] Lautt WW. Hepatic vasculature: A conceptual review. Gastroenterology.

Tygstrup N. Liver function and blood flow in normal man during infusion of vasopressin. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation.

[12] Waseem N, Chen PH. Hypoxic hepatitis: A review and clinical update. Journal of Clinical and Translational

[13] Mallory FB. Necroses of the liver. The Journal of Medical Research.

[14] Lambert RA, Allison BR. Types of lesion in chronic passive congestion of the liver. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins

Hepatology. 2016;**4**:263-268

Hospital. 1916;**27**:350-356

[16] Fragge RG, Kopel FB,

[15] Chinsky M, Sherry S. Serum transaminase as a diagnostic aid. A.M.A. Archives of Internal Medicine.

Iglauer A. Serum glutamic oxalacetic transaminase (SGO-T) in conngestive heart failure: Clinical study and review of the literature. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1960;**52**:1042-1050

[17] Killip T 3rd, Payne MA. High serum transaminase activity in heart disease. Circulatory failure and hepatic necrosis.

Hutchins GM. Hepatic morphology in cardiac dysfunction: A clinicopathologic study of 1000 subjects at autopsy. The American Journal of Pathology.

Circulation. 1960;**21**:646-660

[18] Arcidi JM Jr, Moore GW,

1981;**104**:159-166

[2] Samsky MD, Patel CB, DeWald TA, Smith AD, Felker GM, Rogers JG, et al. Cardiohepatic interactions in heart failure: An overview and clinical implications. Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3] Ford RM, Book W, Spivey JR. Liver disease related to the heart. Transplantation Reviews.

[4] Fouad YM, Yehia R. Hepato-cardiac disorders. World Journal of Hepatology.

[5] Cagli K, Basar FN, Tok D, Turak O, Basar O. How to interpret liver function

[6] Moller S, Bernardi M. Interactions of the heart and the liver. European Heart

[7] Henrion J. Hypoxic hepatitis. Liver International. 2012;**32**:1039-1052

[8] Hilscher M, Sanchez W. Congestive hepatopathy. Clinical Liver Disease.

[9] Zipprich A, Mehal WZ, Ripoll C, Groszmann RJ. A distinct nitric oxide and adenosine A1 receptor dependent hepatic artery vasodilatatory response

tests in heart failure patients? Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology.

Journal. 2013;**34**:2804-2811

## **References**

*Liver Pathology*

**Author details**

Emilio Fábrega1,2,3\*

Hospital, Santander, Spain

(CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain

Santander, Spain

Spain

, Marta Mayorga4

de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain

\*Address all correspondence to: digfge@humv.es

provided the original work is properly cited.

Inés García1

Jose Ignacio Fortea1,2,3, Ángela Puente1,2,3, Antonio Cuadrado1,2,3, Patricia Huelin1,2,3,

1 Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University

2 Infection, Immunity and Digestive Pathology Group, Research Institute Marqués

3 Network Center for Biomedical Research in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases

4 Pathological Anatomy Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital,

5 Radiology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander,

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,

, Javier Crespo1,2,3 and

, Raul Pellon5

**78**

[1] Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the heart failure association (HFA) of the ESC. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2016;**18**:891-975

[2] Samsky MD, Patel CB, DeWald TA, Smith AD, Felker GM, Rogers JG, et al. Cardiohepatic interactions in heart failure: An overview and clinical implications. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013;**61**:2397-2405

[3] Ford RM, Book W, Spivey JR. Liver disease related to the heart. Transplantation Reviews. 2015;**29**:33-37

[4] Fouad YM, Yehia R. Hepato-cardiac disorders. World Journal of Hepatology. 2014;**6**:41-54

[5] Cagli K, Basar FN, Tok D, Turak O, Basar O. How to interpret liver function tests in heart failure patients? Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology. 2015;**26**:197-203

[6] Moller S, Bernardi M. Interactions of the heart and the liver. European Heart Journal. 2013;**34**:2804-2811

[7] Henrion J. Hypoxic hepatitis. Liver International. 2012;**32**:1039-1052

[8] Hilscher M, Sanchez W. Congestive hepatopathy. Clinical Liver Disease. 2016;**8**:68-71

[9] Zipprich A, Mehal WZ, Ripoll C, Groszmann RJ. A distinct nitric oxide and adenosine A1 receptor dependent hepatic artery vasodilatatory response in the CCl-cirrhotic liver. Liver International. 2010;**30**:988-994

[10] Lautt WW. Hepatic vasculature: A conceptual review. Gastroenterology. 1977;**73**:1163-1169

[11] Jacobsen KR, Ranek L, Tygstrup N. Liver function and blood flow in normal man during infusion of vasopressin. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 1969;**24**:279-284

[12] Waseem N, Chen PH. Hypoxic hepatitis: A review and clinical update. Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology. 2016;**4**:263-268

[13] Mallory FB. Necroses of the liver. The Journal of Medical Research. 1901;**6**:264-80.7

[14] Lambert RA, Allison BR. Types of lesion in chronic passive congestion of the liver. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital. 1916;**27**:350-356

[15] Chinsky M, Sherry S. Serum transaminase as a diagnostic aid. A.M.A. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1957;**99**:556-568

[16] Fragge RG, Kopel FB, Iglauer A. Serum glutamic oxalacetic transaminase (SGO-T) in conngestive heart failure: Clinical study and review of the literature. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1960;**52**:1042-1050

[17] Killip T 3rd, Payne MA. High serum transaminase activity in heart disease. Circulatory failure and hepatic necrosis. Circulation. 1960;**21**:646-660

[18] Arcidi JM Jr, Moore GW, Hutchins GM. Hepatic morphology in cardiac dysfunction: A clinicopathologic study of 1000 subjects at autopsy. The American Journal of Pathology. 1981;**104**:159-166

[19] Birgens HS, Henriksen J, Matzen P, Poulsen H. The shock liver. Clinical and biochemical findings in patients with centrilobular liver necrosis following cardiogenic shock. Acta Medica Scandinavica. 1978;**204**:417-421

[20] Bynum TE, Boitnott JK, Maddrey WC. Ischemic hepatitis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 1979;**24**:129-135

[21] Henrion J, Luwaert R, Colin L, Schmitz A, Schapira M, Heller FR. Hypoxic hepatitis. Prospective, clinical and hemodynamic study of 45 cases. Gastroentérologie Clinique et Biologique. 1990;**14**:836-841

[22] Henrion J, Schapira M, Luwaert R, Colin L, Delannoy A, Heller FR. Hypoxic hepatitis: Clinical and hemodynamic study in 142 consecutive cases. Medicine. 2003;**82**:392-406

[23] Birrer R, Takuda Y, Takara T. Hypoxic hepatopathy: Pathophysiology and prognosis. Internal Medicine. 2007;**46**:1063-1070

[24] Xanthopoulos A, Starling RC, Kitai T, Triposkiadis F. Heart failure and liver disease: Cardiohepatic interactions. JACC Heart Failure. 2019;**7**:87-97

[25] Koehne de Gonzalez AK, Lefkowitch JH. Heart disease and the liver: Pathologic evaluation. Gastroenterology Clinics of North America. 2017;**46**:421-435

[26] Tapper EB, Sengupta N, Bonder A. The incidence and outcomes of ischemic hepatitis: A systematic review with meta-analysis. The American Journal of Medicine. 2015;**128**:1314-1321

[27] Fuhrmann V, Kneidinger N, Herkner H, Heinz G, Nikfardjam M, Bojic A, et al. Hypoxic hepatitis: Underlying conditions and risk factors for mortality in critically ill

patients. Intensive Care Medicine. 2009;**35**:1397-1405

[28] Raurich JM, Llompart-Pou JA, Ferreruela M, Colomar A, Molina M, Royo C, et al. Hypoxic hepatitis in critically ill patients: Incidence, etiology and risk factors for mortality. Journal of Anesthesia. 2011;**25**:50-56

[29] Henrion J, Descamps O, Luwaert R, Schapira M, Parfonry A, Heller F. Hypoxic hepatitis in patients with cardiac failure: Incidence in a coronary care unit and measurement of hepatic blood flow. Journal of Hepatology. 1994;**21**:696-703

[30] Waseem N, Limketkai BN, Kim B, Woreta T, Gurakar A, Chen PH. Risk and prognosis of acute liver injury among hospitalized patients with hemodynamic instability: A Nationwide analysis. Annals of Hepatology. 2018;**17**:119-124

[31] Weemhoff JL, Woolbright BL, Jenkins RE, McGill MR, Sharpe MR, Olson JC, et al. Plasma biomarkers to study mechanisms of liver injury in patients with hypoxic hepatitis. Liver International. 2017;**37**:377-384

[32] Richman SM, Delman AJ, Grob D. Alterations in indices of liver function in congestive heart failure with particular reference to serum enzymes. The American Journal of Medicine. 1961;**30**:211-225

[33] Seeto RK, Fenn B, Rockey DC. Ischemic hepatitis: Clinical presentation and pathogenesis. The American Journal of Medicine. 2000;**109**:109-113

[34] Zhang H, Vincent JL. Oxygen extraction is altered by endotoxin during tamponade-induced stagnant hypoxia in the dog. Circulatory Shock. 1993;**40**:168-176

[35] Nelson DP, Samsel RW, Wood LD, Schumacker PT. Pathological supply

**81**

*Cardiac Hepatopathy*

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

dependence of systemic and intestinal O2 uptake during endotoxemia. Journal of Applied Physiology. 1988;**64**:2410-2419

chemistry tests. Gastroenterology.

[46] Jager B, Drolz A, Michl B, Schellongowski P, Bojic A,

[45] Taylor RM, Tujios S, Jinjuvadia K, Davern T, Shaikh OS, Han S, et al. Short and long-term outcomes in patients with acute liver failure due to ischemic hepatitis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2012;**57**:777-785

Nikfardjam M, et al. Jaundice increases the rate of complications and oneyear mortality in patients with hypoxic hepatitis. Hepatology.

[47] Sherlock S. The liver IN heart failure relation of anatomical, functional, and circulatory changes. British Heart

[48] Boland E, Willius F. Changes in the liver produced by chronic passive congestion with special reference to the problem of cardiac cirrhosis. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1938;**62**:723-739

[49] Kavoliuniene A, Vaitiekiene A, Cesnaite G. Congestive hepatopathy and hypoxic hepatitis in heart failure: A cardiologist's point of view. International Journal of Cardiology.

[50] Myers RP, Cerini R, Sayegh R, Moreau R, Degott C, Lebrec D, et al. Cardiac hepatopathy: Clinical, hemodynamic, and histologic characteristics and correlations. Hepatology. 2003;**37**:393-400

[51] Lemmer A, VanWagner LB, Ganger D. Assessment of advanced liver fibrosis and the risk for hepatic decompensation in patients with congestive hepatopathy. Hepatology.

[52] Kubo SH, Walter BA, John DH, Clark M, Cody RJ. Liver function abnormalities in chronic heart failure.

2002;**123**:1367-1384

2012;**56**:2297-2304

Journal. 1951;**13**:273-293

2013;**166**:554-558

2018;**68**:1633-1641

[37] Ellenberg M, Osserman KE. The role of shock in the production of central liver cell necrosis. The American Journal

Burnett CH, Simeone FA, Shapiro SL, Beecher HK. VII. The general pathology

[36] Wilson WC, Macgregor AR, Stewart CP. The clinical course and pathology of burns and scalds under modern methods of treatment. British Journal of Surgery. 1938;**25**:826-865

of Medicine. 1951;**11**:170-178

[38] Mallory TB, Sullivan ER,

of traumatic shock. Surgery.

[39] Brunson JG, Eckman PL, Campbell JB. Increasing prevalence of unexplained liver necrosis. The New England Journal of Medicine.

[40] de la Monte SM, Arcidi JM, Moore GW, Hutchins GM. Midzonal necrosis as a pattern of hepatocellular injury after shock. Gastroenterology.

[41] Aboelsoud MM, Javaid AI, Al-Qadi MO, Lewis JH. Hypoxic

hepatitis—Its biochemical profile, causes and risk factors of mortality in criticallyill patients: A cohort study of 565 patients. Journal of Critical Care. 2017;**41**:9-15

[42] Cassidy WM, Reynolds TB. Serum lactic dehydrogenase in the differential diagnosis of acute hepatocellular injury. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.

Evaluation of abnormal liver tests. The Medical Clinics of North America.

[44] Green RM, Flamm S. AGA technical

[43] Woreta TA, Alqahtani SA.

review on the evaluation of liver

1950;**27**:629-644

1957;**257**:52-56

1984;**86**:627-631

1994;**19**:118-121

2014;**98**:1-16

*Cardiac Hepatopathy DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

*Liver Pathology*

[19] Birgens HS, Henriksen J, Matzen P, Poulsen H. The shock liver. Clinical and biochemical findings in patients with centrilobular liver necrosis following cardiogenic shock. Acta Medica Scandinavica. 1978;**204**:417-421

patients. Intensive Care Medicine.

[28] Raurich JM, Llompart-Pou JA, Ferreruela M, Colomar A, Molina M, Royo C, et al. Hypoxic hepatitis in critically ill patients: Incidence, etiology and risk factors for mortality. Journal of

Anesthesia. 2011;**25**:50-56

[29] Henrion J, Descamps O,

Luwaert R, Schapira M, Parfonry A, Heller F. Hypoxic hepatitis in patients with cardiac failure: Incidence in a coronary care unit and measurement of hepatic blood flow. Journal of Hepatology. 1994;**21**:696-703

[30] Waseem N, Limketkai BN, Kim B, Woreta T, Gurakar A, Chen PH. Risk and prognosis of acute liver injury among hospitalized patients with hemodynamic instability: A Nationwide analysis. Annals

of Hepatology. 2018;**17**:119-124

[32] Richman SM, Delman AJ,

1961;**30**:211-225

2000;**109**:109-113

1993;**40**:168-176

[33] Seeto RK, Fenn B,

Grob D. Alterations in indices of liver function in congestive heart failure with particular reference to serum enzymes. The American Journal of Medicine.

Rockey DC. Ischemic hepatitis: Clinical

presentation and pathogenesis. The American Journal of Medicine.

[34] Zhang H, Vincent JL. Oxygen extraction is altered by endotoxin during tamponade-induced stagnant hypoxia in the dog. Circulatory Shock.

[35] Nelson DP, Samsel RW, Wood LD, Schumacker PT. Pathological supply

[31] Weemhoff JL, Woolbright BL, Jenkins RE, McGill MR, Sharpe MR, Olson JC, et al. Plasma biomarkers to study mechanisms of liver injury in patients with hypoxic hepatitis. Liver International. 2017;**37**:377-384

2009;**35**:1397-1405

[20] Bynum TE, Boitnott JK, Maddrey WC. Ischemic hepatitis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[21] Henrion J, Luwaert R, Colin L, Schmitz A, Schapira M, Heller FR. Hypoxic hepatitis. Prospective, clinical and hemodynamic study of 45 cases. Gastroentérologie Clinique et Biologique. 1990;**14**:836-841

[22] Henrion J, Schapira M, Luwaert R, Colin L, Delannoy A, Heller FR. Hypoxic hepatitis: Clinical and hemodynamic study in 142 consecutive cases. Medicine. 2003;**82**:392-406

[23] Birrer R, Takuda Y, Takara T. Hypoxic

hepatopathy: Pathophysiology and prognosis. Internal Medicine.

[24] Xanthopoulos A, Starling RC, Kitai T, Triposkiadis F. Heart failure and liver disease: Cardiohepatic interactions.

JACC Heart Failure. 2019;**7**:87-97

[25] Koehne de Gonzalez AK, Lefkowitch JH. Heart disease and the liver: Pathologic evaluation. Gastroenterology Clinics of North

America. 2017;**46**:421-435

2015;**128**:1314-1321

[26] Tapper EB, Sengupta N,

[27] Fuhrmann V, Kneidinger N, Herkner H, Heinz G, Nikfardjam M, Bojic A, et al. Hypoxic hepatitis: Underlying conditions and risk factors for mortality in critically ill

Bonder A. The incidence and outcomes of ischemic hepatitis: A systematic review with meta-analysis. The American Journal of Medicine.

2007;**46**:1063-1070

1979;**24**:129-135

**80**

dependence of systemic and intestinal O2 uptake during endotoxemia. Journal of Applied Physiology. 1988;**64**:2410-2419

[36] Wilson WC, Macgregor AR, Stewart CP. The clinical course and pathology of burns and scalds under modern methods of treatment. British Journal of Surgery. 1938;**25**:826-865

[37] Ellenberg M, Osserman KE. The role of shock in the production of central liver cell necrosis. The American Journal of Medicine. 1951;**11**:170-178

[38] Mallory TB, Sullivan ER, Burnett CH, Simeone FA, Shapiro SL, Beecher HK. VII. The general pathology of traumatic shock. Surgery. 1950;**27**:629-644

[39] Brunson JG, Eckman PL, Campbell JB. Increasing prevalence of unexplained liver necrosis. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1957;**257**:52-56

[40] de la Monte SM, Arcidi JM, Moore GW, Hutchins GM. Midzonal necrosis as a pattern of hepatocellular injury after shock. Gastroenterology. 1984;**86**:627-631

[41] Aboelsoud MM, Javaid AI, Al-Qadi MO, Lewis JH. Hypoxic hepatitis—Its biochemical profile, causes and risk factors of mortality in criticallyill patients: A cohort study of 565 patients. Journal of Critical Care. 2017;**41**:9-15

[42] Cassidy WM, Reynolds TB. Serum lactic dehydrogenase in the differential diagnosis of acute hepatocellular injury. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 1994;**19**:118-121

[43] Woreta TA, Alqahtani SA. Evaluation of abnormal liver tests. The Medical Clinics of North America. 2014;**98**:1-16

[44] Green RM, Flamm S. AGA technical review on the evaluation of liver

chemistry tests. Gastroenterology. 2002;**123**:1367-1384

[45] Taylor RM, Tujios S, Jinjuvadia K, Davern T, Shaikh OS, Han S, et al. Short and long-term outcomes in patients with acute liver failure due to ischemic hepatitis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2012;**57**:777-785

[46] Jager B, Drolz A, Michl B, Schellongowski P, Bojic A, Nikfardjam M, et al. Jaundice increases the rate of complications and oneyear mortality in patients with hypoxic hepatitis. Hepatology. 2012;**56**:2297-2304

[47] Sherlock S. The liver IN heart failure relation of anatomical, functional, and circulatory changes. British Heart Journal. 1951;**13**:273-293

[48] Boland E, Willius F. Changes in the liver produced by chronic passive congestion with special reference to the problem of cardiac cirrhosis. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1938;**62**:723-739

[49] Kavoliuniene A, Vaitiekiene A, Cesnaite G. Congestive hepatopathy and hypoxic hepatitis in heart failure: A cardiologist's point of view. International Journal of Cardiology. 2013;**166**:554-558

[50] Myers RP, Cerini R, Sayegh R, Moreau R, Degott C, Lebrec D, et al. Cardiac hepatopathy: Clinical, hemodynamic, and histologic characteristics and correlations. Hepatology. 2003;**37**:393-400

[51] Lemmer A, VanWagner LB, Ganger D. Assessment of advanced liver fibrosis and the risk for hepatic decompensation in patients with congestive hepatopathy. Hepatology. 2018;**68**:1633-1641

[52] Kubo SH, Walter BA, John DH, Clark M, Cody RJ. Liver function abnormalities in chronic heart failure. Influence of systemic hemodynamics. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1987;**147**:1227-1230

[53] Allen LA, Felker GM, Pocock S, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, et al. Liver function abnormalities and outcome in patients with chronic heart failure: Data from the candesartan in heart failure: Assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2009;**11**:170-177

[54] Gelow JM, Desai AS, Hochberg CP, Glickman JN, Givertz MM, Fang JC. Clinical predictors of hepatic fibrosis in chronic advanced heart failure. Circulation. Heart Failure. 2010;**3**:59-64

[55] van Deursen VM, Damman K, Hillege HL, van Beek AP, van Veldhuisen DJ, Voors AA. Abnormal liver function in relation to hemodynamic profile in heart failure patients. Journal of Cardiac Failure. 2010;**16**:84-90

[56] Poelzl G, Ess M, Mussner-Seeber C, Pachinger O, Frick M, Ulmer H. Liver dysfunction in chronic heart failure: Prevalence, characteristics and prognostic significance. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2012;**42**:153-163

[57] Megalla S, Holtzman D, Aronow WS, Nazari R, Korenfeld S, Schwarcz A, et al. Predictors of cardiac hepatopathy in patients with right heart failure. Medical Science Monitor. 2011;**17**:Cr537-Cr541

[58] Simonetto DA, Yang HY, Yin M, de Assuncao TM, Kwon JH, Hilscher M, et al. Chronic passive venous congestion drives hepatic fibrogenesis via sinusoidal thrombosis and mechanical forces. Hepatology. 2015;**61**:648-659

[59] Marra F, DeFranco R, Grappone C, Milani S, Pinzani M, Pellegrini G, et al. Expression of the thrombin receptor in human liver: Up-regulation during acute and chronic injury. Hepatology. 1998;**27**:462-471

[60] Marra F, Grandaliano G, Valente AJ, Abboud HE. Thrombin stimulates proliferation of liver fatstoring cells and expression of monocyte chemotactic protein-1: Potential role in liver injury. Hepatology. 1995;**22**:780-787

[61] Wanless IR, Liu JJ, Butany J. Role of thrombosis in the pathogenesis of congestive hepatic fibrosis (cardiac cirrhosis). Hepatology. 1995;**21**:1232-1237

[62] Cerini F, Vilaseca M, Lafoz E, Garcia-Irigoyen O, Garcia-Caldero H, Tripathi DM, et al. Enoxaparin reduces hepatic vascular resistance and portal pressure in cirrhotic rats. Journal of Hepatology. 2016;**64**:834-842

[63] Nakao T, Arii S, Kaido T, Mori A, Murata T, Matsumori A, et al. Heparin accelerates liver regeneration following portal branch ligation in normal and cirrhotic rats with increased plasma hepatocyte growth factor levels. Journal of Hepatology. 2002;**37**:87-92

[64] Abdel-Salam OM, Baiuomy AR, Ameen A, Hassan NS. A study of unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins in a model of cholestatic liver injury in the rat. Pharmacological Research. 2005;**51**:59-67

[65] Li W, Zhang J, Huang Q, Zhu H, Zhang X. Long-term administering low anticoagulant activity heparin can lessen rat hepatic fibrosis induced by either CCl(4) or porcine serum injection. Hepatology Research. 2006;**36**:115-123

[66] Abe W, Ikejima K, Lang T, Okumura K, Enomoto N, Kitamura T, et al. Low molecular weight heparin prevents hepatic fibrogenesis caused by carbon tetrachloride in the rat. Journal of Hepatology. 2007;**46**:286-294

**83**

*Cardiac Hepatopathy*

[67] Assy N, Hussein O,

Sciences. 2007;**52**:1187-1193

[68] Kukner A, Tore F, Firat T, Terzi EH, Oner H, Balaban YH, et al. The preventive effect of low molecular weight heparin on CCL(4)-induced necrosis and apoptosis in rat liver. Annals of Hepatology. 2010;**9**:445-454

2011;**32**:1438-1445

2012;**3**:86-92

2008;**6**:1336-1343

2017;**65**:2031-2044

[69] Lee JH, Lee H, Joung YK, Jung KH, Choi JH, Lee DH, et al. The use of low molecular weight heparin-pluronic nanogels to impede liver fibrosis by inhibition the TGF-beta/Smad signaling pathway. Biomaterials.

[70] Shah B, Shah G. Antifibrotic effect of heparin on liver fibrosis model in rats. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

[71] Anstee QM, Goldin RD, Wright M, Martinelli A, Cox R, Thursz MR. Coagulation status modulates murine hepatic fibrogenesis: Implications for the development of novel therapies. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[72] Lee KC, Hsu WF, Hsieh YC, Chan CC, Yang YY, Huang YH, et al. Dabigatran reduces liver fibrosis in thioacetamide-injured rats. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2019;**64**:102-112

[73] Vilaseca M, Garcia-Caldero H, Lafoz E, Garcia-Irigoyen O, Avila MA, Reverter JC, et al. The anticoagulant rivaroxaban lowers portal hypertension in cirrhotic rats mainly by deactivating hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology.

[74] Villa E, Camma C, Marietta M, Luongo M, Critelli R, Colopi S, et al.

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

Enoxaparin prevents portal vein thrombosis and liver decompensation in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

Fernandez-Mena C, Puerto M, Bosoi CR, Almagro J, et al. Enoxaparin does not ameliorate liver fibrosis or portal hypertension in rats with advanced cirrhosis. Liver International.

Gastroenterology. 2012;**143**:

[75] Fortea JI, Zipprich A,

[76] Kiesewetter CH, Sheron N, Vettukattill JJ, Hacking N, Stedman B, Millward-Sadler H, et al. Hepatic changes in the failing Fontan circulation. Heart.

Pathology. 2008;**61**:504-508

[79] Farias AQ, Silvestre OM,

Garcia-Tsao G, da Costa Seguro LF, de Campos Mazo DF, Bacal F, et al. Serum B-type natriuretic peptide in the initial workup of patients with new onset ascites: A diagnostic accuracy study. Hepatology. 2014;**59**:1043-1051

[80] Runyon BA. Cardiac ascites: A characterization. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 1988;**10**:410-412

[81] McConnell M, Iwakiri Y. Biology of portal hypertension. Hepatology

International. 2018;**12**:11-23

[82] Sheer TA, Joo E, Runyon BA.

Usefulness of serum N-terminal-ProBNP

[78] Wu FM, Kogon B, Earing MG, Aboulhosn JA, Broberg CS, John AS, et al. Liver health in adults with Fontan circulation: A multicenter crosssectional study. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[77] Kendall TJ, Stedman B, Hacking N, Haw M, Vettukattill JJ, Salmon AP, et al. Hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis in the Fontan circulation: A detailed morphological study. Journal of Clinical

1253-1260. e1-4

2018;**38**:102-112

2007;**93**:579-584

2017;**153**:656-664

Khalil A, Luder A, Szvalb S, Paizi M, et al. The beneficial effect of aspirin and enoxaparin on fibrosis progression and regenerative activity in a rat model of cirrhosis. Digestive Diseases and

*Cardiac Hepatopathy DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

*Liver Pathology*

1987;**147**:1227-1230

Failure. 2009;**11**:170-177

[54] Gelow JM, Desai AS, Hochberg CP, Glickman JN,

2010;**3**:59-64

2010;**16**:84-90

2012;**42**:153-163

2011;**17**:Cr537-Cr541

[57] Megalla S, Holtzman D,

Aronow WS, Nazari R, Korenfeld S, Schwarcz A, et al. Predictors of cardiac hepatopathy in patients with right heart failure. Medical Science Monitor.

[58] Simonetto DA, Yang HY, Yin M, de Assuncao TM, Kwon JH, Hilscher M, et al. Chronic passive venous congestion

sinusoidal thrombosis and mechanical forces. Hepatology. 2015;**61**:648-659

[59] Marra F, DeFranco R, Grappone C, Milani S, Pinzani M, Pellegrini G, et al.

drives hepatic fibrogenesis via

Givertz MM, Fang JC. Clinical predictors of hepatic fibrosis in chronic advanced heart failure. Circulation. Heart Failure.

[55] van Deursen VM, Damman K, Hillege HL, van Beek AP, van Veldhuisen DJ, Voors AA. Abnormal

hemodynamic profile in heart failure patients. Journal of Cardiac Failure.

[56] Poelzl G, Ess M, Mussner-Seeber C, Pachinger O, Frick M, Ulmer H. Liver dysfunction in chronic heart failure: Prevalence, characteristics and prognostic significance. European Journal of Clinical Investigation.

liver function in relation to

Influence of systemic hemodynamics. Archives of Internal Medicine.

Expression of the thrombin receptor in human liver: Up-regulation during acute and chronic injury. Hepatology.

[61] Wanless IR, Liu JJ, Butany J. Role of thrombosis in the pathogenesis of congestive hepatic fibrosis (cardiac cirrhosis). Hepatology.

[62] Cerini F, Vilaseca M, Lafoz E, Garcia-Irigoyen O, Garcia-Caldero H, Tripathi DM, et al. Enoxaparin reduces hepatic vascular resistance and portal pressure in cirrhotic rats. Journal of Hepatology. 2016;**64**:834-842

[63] Nakao T, Arii S, Kaido T, Mori A, Murata T, Matsumori A, et al. Heparin accelerates liver regeneration following portal branch ligation in normal and cirrhotic rats with increased plasma hepatocyte growth factor levels. Journal

of Hepatology. 2002;**37**:87-92

Research. 2005;**51**:59-67

[64] Abdel-Salam OM, Baiuomy AR, Ameen A, Hassan NS. A study of unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins in a model of cholestatic liver injury in the rat. Pharmacological

[65] Li W, Zhang J, Huang Q, Zhu H, Zhang X. Long-term administering low anticoagulant activity heparin can lessen rat hepatic fibrosis induced by either CCl(4) or porcine serum injection. Hepatology Research. 2006;**36**:115-123

[66] Abe W, Ikejima K, Lang T, Okumura K, Enomoto N, Kitamura T, et al. Low molecular weight heparin prevents hepatic fibrogenesis caused by carbon tetrachloride in the rat. Journal of Hepatology. 2007;**46**:286-294

1998;**27**:462-471

1995;**21**:1232-1237

[60] Marra F, Grandaliano G, Valente AJ, Abboud HE. Thrombin stimulates proliferation of liver fatstoring cells and expression of monocyte chemotactic protein-1: Potential role in liver injury. Hepatology. 1995;**22**:780-787

[53] Allen LA, Felker GM, Pocock S, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, et al. Liver function abnormalities and outcome in patients with chronic heart failure: Data from the candesartan in heart failure: Assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. European Journal of Heart

**82**

[67] Assy N, Hussein O, Khalil A, Luder A, Szvalb S, Paizi M, et al. The beneficial effect of aspirin and enoxaparin on fibrosis progression and regenerative activity in a rat model of cirrhosis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2007;**52**:1187-1193

[68] Kukner A, Tore F, Firat T, Terzi EH, Oner H, Balaban YH, et al. The preventive effect of low molecular weight heparin on CCL(4)-induced necrosis and apoptosis in rat liver. Annals of Hepatology. 2010;**9**:445-454

[69] Lee JH, Lee H, Joung YK, Jung KH, Choi JH, Lee DH, et al. The use of low molecular weight heparin-pluronic nanogels to impede liver fibrosis by inhibition the TGF-beta/Smad signaling pathway. Biomaterials. 2011;**32**:1438-1445

[70] Shah B, Shah G. Antifibrotic effect of heparin on liver fibrosis model in rats. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2012;**3**:86-92

[71] Anstee QM, Goldin RD, Wright M, Martinelli A, Cox R, Thursz MR. Coagulation status modulates murine hepatic fibrogenesis: Implications for the development of novel therapies. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2008;**6**:1336-1343

[72] Lee KC, Hsu WF, Hsieh YC, Chan CC, Yang YY, Huang YH, et al. Dabigatran reduces liver fibrosis in thioacetamide-injured rats. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2019;**64**:102-112

[73] Vilaseca M, Garcia-Caldero H, Lafoz E, Garcia-Irigoyen O, Avila MA, Reverter JC, et al. The anticoagulant rivaroxaban lowers portal hypertension in cirrhotic rats mainly by deactivating hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology. 2017;**65**:2031-2044

[74] Villa E, Camma C, Marietta M, Luongo M, Critelli R, Colopi S, et al. Enoxaparin prevents portal vein thrombosis and liver decompensation in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2012;**143**: 1253-1260. e1-4

[75] Fortea JI, Zipprich A, Fernandez-Mena C, Puerto M, Bosoi CR, Almagro J, et al. Enoxaparin does not ameliorate liver fibrosis or portal hypertension in rats with advanced cirrhosis. Liver International. 2018;**38**:102-112

[76] Kiesewetter CH, Sheron N, Vettukattill JJ, Hacking N, Stedman B, Millward-Sadler H, et al. Hepatic changes in the failing Fontan circulation. Heart. 2007;**93**:579-584

[77] Kendall TJ, Stedman B, Hacking N, Haw M, Vettukattill JJ, Salmon AP, et al. Hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis in the Fontan circulation: A detailed morphological study. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2008;**61**:504-508

[78] Wu FM, Kogon B, Earing MG, Aboulhosn JA, Broberg CS, John AS, et al. Liver health in adults with Fontan circulation: A multicenter crosssectional study. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2017;**153**:656-664

[79] Farias AQ, Silvestre OM, Garcia-Tsao G, da Costa Seguro LF, de Campos Mazo DF, Bacal F, et al. Serum B-type natriuretic peptide in the initial workup of patients with new onset ascites: A diagnostic accuracy study. Hepatology. 2014;**59**:1043-1051

[80] Runyon BA. Cardiac ascites: A characterization. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 1988;**10**:410-412

[81] McConnell M, Iwakiri Y. Biology of portal hypertension. Hepatology International. 2018;**12**:11-23

[82] Sheer TA, Joo E, Runyon BA. Usefulness of serum N-terminal-ProBNP in distinguishing ascites due to cirrhosis from ascites due to heart failure. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 2010;**44**:e23-e26

[83] Lau GT, Tan HC, Kritharides L. Type of liver dysfunction in heart failure and its relation to the severity of tricuspid regurgitation. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2002;**90**:1405-1409

[84] Wells ML, Venkatesh SK. Congestive hepatopathy. Abdominal Radiology. 2018;**43**:2037-2051

[85] Rychik J, Atz AM, Celermajer DS, Deal BJ, Gatzoulis MA, Gewillig MH, et al. Evaluation and management of the child and adult with Fontan circulation: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019:Cir0000000000000696

[86] Dhall D, Kim SA, Mc Phaul C, Kransdorf EP, Kobashigawa JA, Sundaram V, et al. Heterogeneity of fibrosis in liver biopsies of patients with heart failure undergoing heart transplant evaluation. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2018;**42**:1617-1624

[87] Dai DF, Swanson PE, Krieger EV, Liou IW, Carithers RL, Yeh MM. Congestive hepatic fibrosis score: A novel histologic assessment of clinical severity. Modern Pathology. 2014;**27**:1552-1558

[88] Bosch DE, Koro K, Richards E, Hoch BL, Jalikis F, Koch LK, et al. Validation of a congestive hepatic fibrosis scoring system. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2019;**43**:766-772

[89] Surrey LF, Russo P, Rychik J, Goldberg DJ, Dodds K, O'Byrne ML, et al. Prevalence and characterization of fibrosis in surveillance liver biopsies of patients with Fontan circulation. Human Pathology. 2016;**57**:106-115

[90] Louie CY, Pham MX, Daugherty TJ, Kambham N, Higgins JP. The liver in heart failure: A biopsy and explant series of the histopathologic and laboratory findings with a particular focus on pre-cardiac transplant evaluation. Modern Pathology. 2015;**28**:932-943

[91] European Association for Study of L, Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del H. EASL-ALEH clinical practice guidelines: Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. Journal of Hepatology. 2015;**63**:237-264

[92] Lemmer A, VanWagner L, Ganger D. Congestive hepatopathy: Differentiating congestion from fibrosis. Clinical Liver Disease. 2017;**10**:139-143

[93] Diamond T, Ovchinsky N. Fontanassociated liver disease: Monitoring progression of liver fibrosis. Clinical Liver Disease. 2018;**11**:1-5

[94] Evans WN, Acherman RJ, Ciccolo ML, Carrillo SA, Galindo A, Rothman A, et al. MELD-XI scores correlate with post-Fontan hepatic biopsy fibrosis scores. Pediatric Cardiology. 2016;**37**:1274-1277

[95] Friedrich-Rust M, Koch C, Rentzsch A, Sarrazin C, Schwarz P, Herrmann E, et al. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with Fontan circulation using transient elastography and biochemical fibrosis markers. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2008;**135**:560-567

[96] Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Garcia-Pagan JC. The clinical use of HVPG measurements in chronic liver disease. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2009;**6**:573-582

[97] Burroughs AK, Thalheimer U. Hepatic venous pressure gradient in 2010: Optimal measurement is key. Hepatology. 2010;**51**:1894-1896

**85**

*Cardiac Hepatopathy*

2014;**18**:779-792

Imaging. 2014;**95**:11-15

[98] Abraldes JG, Sarlieve P, Tandon P. Measurement of portal pressure. Clinics in Liver Disease.

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

[99] Dohan A, Guerrache Y, Boudiaf M, Gavini JP, Kaci R, Soyer P. Transjugular liver biopsy: Indications, technique and results. Diagnostic and Interventional

[100] Ruttmann E, Brant LJ, Concin H, Diem G, Rapp K, Ulmer H. Gammaglutamyltransferase as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease mortality: An epidemiological investigation in a cohort of 163,944 Austrian adults. Circulation. 2005;**112**:2130-2137

[101] Assenza GE, Graham DA,

2013;**99**:491-496

Landzberg MJ, Valente AM, Singh MN, Bashir A, et al. MELD-XI score and cardiac mortality or transplantation in patients after Fontan surgery. Heart.

[102] Kim MS, Kato TS, Farr M, Wu C, Givens RC, Collado E, et al. Hepatic dysfunction in ambulatory patients with heart failure: Application of the MELD scoring system for outcome prediction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013;**61**:2253-2261

[103] Deo SV, Al-Kindi SG,

2016;**35**:222-227

Altarabsheh SE, Hang D, Kumar S, Ginwalla MB, et al. Model for end-stage liver disease excluding international normalized ratio (MELD-XI) score predicts heart transplant outcomes: Evidence from the registry of the united network for organ sharing. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation.

[104] Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association

task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013;**128**:e240-e327

*Cardiac Hepatopathy DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89177*

[98] Abraldes JG, Sarlieve P, Tandon P. Measurement of portal pressure. Clinics in Liver Disease. 2014;**18**:779-792

*Liver Pathology*

2010;**44**:e23-e26

2002;**90**:1405-1409

2018;**43**:2037-2051

of the child and adult with Fontan circulation: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019:Cir0000000000000696

[86] Dhall D, Kim SA, Mc

[87] Dai DF, Swanson PE,

2014;**27**:1552-1558

2019;**43**:766-772

Krieger EV, Liou IW, Carithers RL, Yeh MM. Congestive hepatic fibrosis score: A novel histologic assessment of clinical severity. Modern Pathology.

[88] Bosch DE, Koro K, Richards E, Hoch BL, Jalikis F, Koch LK, et al. Validation of a congestive hepatic fibrosis scoring system. The American

Journal of Surgical Pathology.

[89] Surrey LF, Russo P, Rychik J, Goldberg DJ, Dodds K, O'Byrne ML, et al. Prevalence and characterization of fibrosis in surveillance liver biopsies of patients with Fontan circulation. Human Pathology. 2016;**57**:106-115

in distinguishing ascites due to cirrhosis

[90] Louie CY, Pham MX, Daugherty TJ, Kambham N, Higgins JP. The liver in heart failure: A biopsy and explant series of the histopathologic and laboratory findings with a particular focus on pre-cardiac transplant evaluation. Modern Pathology.

[91] European Association for Study of L, Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del H. EASL-ALEH clinical practice guidelines: Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. Journal of Hepatology.

2015;**28**:932-943

2015;**63**:237-264

[92] Lemmer A, VanWagner L, Ganger D. Congestive hepatopathy: Differentiating congestion from fibrosis. Clinical Liver Disease. 2017;**10**:139-143

Liver Disease. 2018;**11**:1-5

[94] Evans WN, Acherman RJ, Ciccolo ML, Carrillo SA, Galindo A, Rothman A, et al. MELD-XI scores correlate with post-Fontan hepatic biopsy fibrosis scores. Pediatric Cardiology. 2016;**37**:1274-1277

[95] Friedrich-Rust M, Koch C, Rentzsch A, Sarrazin C, Schwarz P, Herrmann E, et al. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with Fontan circulation using transient elastography and biochemical fibrosis markers. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2008;**135**:560-567

[96] Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Garcia-Pagan JC. The clinical use of HVPG measurements in chronic liver disease. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology

& Hepatology. 2009;**6**:573-582

[97] Burroughs AK, Thalheimer U. Hepatic venous pressure gradient in 2010: Optimal measurement is key. Hepatology. 2010;**51**:1894-1896

[93] Diamond T, Ovchinsky N. Fontanassociated liver disease: Monitoring progression of liver fibrosis. Clinical

from ascites due to heart failure. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.

[83] Lau GT, Tan HC, Kritharides L. Type of liver dysfunction in heart failure and its relation to the severity of tricuspid regurgitation. The American Journal of Cardiology.

[84] Wells ML, Venkatesh SK. Congestive hepatopathy. Abdominal Radiology.

[85] Rychik J, Atz AM, Celermajer DS, Deal BJ, Gatzoulis MA, Gewillig MH, et al. Evaluation and management

Phaul C, Kransdorf EP, Kobashigawa JA, Sundaram V, et al. Heterogeneity of fibrosis in liver biopsies of patients with heart failure undergoing heart transplant evaluation. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2018;**42**:1617-1624

**84**

[99] Dohan A, Guerrache Y, Boudiaf M, Gavini JP, Kaci R, Soyer P. Transjugular liver biopsy: Indications, technique and results. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging. 2014;**95**:11-15

[100] Ruttmann E, Brant LJ, Concin H, Diem G, Rapp K, Ulmer H. Gammaglutamyltransferase as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease mortality: An epidemiological investigation in a cohort of 163,944 Austrian adults. Circulation. 2005;**112**:2130-2137

[101] Assenza GE, Graham DA, Landzberg MJ, Valente AM, Singh MN, Bashir A, et al. MELD-XI score and cardiac mortality or transplantation in patients after Fontan surgery. Heart. 2013;**99**:491-496

[102] Kim MS, Kato TS, Farr M, Wu C, Givens RC, Collado E, et al. Hepatic dysfunction in ambulatory patients with heart failure: Application of the MELD scoring system for outcome prediction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013;**61**:2253-2261

[103] Deo SV, Al-Kindi SG, Altarabsheh SE, Hang D, Kumar S, Ginwalla MB, et al. Model for end-stage liver disease excluding international normalized ratio (MELD-XI) score predicts heart transplant outcomes: Evidence from the registry of the united network for organ sharing. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 2016;**35**:222-227

[104] Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013;**128**:e240-e327

**87**

to hepatitis B and C.

**Chapter 5**

**Abstract**

therapeutic engineering

**1. Introduction**

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A

*Mani Sharma, Neeraj Kumar Chouhan and Sandeep Vaidya*

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide, deteriorating approximately 1000,000 lives. Annually rising HCC to the third most common cause of cancer mortality. Liver cancer varies geographically depending on multimodality treatments available for this heterogeneous malignancy. Conglomeration of treatments has been exercised to manage this type of cancer across distinct geographic regions. Unprecedented rise of scientific knowledge mining from the published literature is a boon to develop novel treatment modalities. We aim to focus such pharmacological aspects in HCC treatment that could effectively display the improved therapies. Extrapolating the details of liver cancer (classification, diagnosis, adequate treatments, therapeutic engineering involved in the therapy, causes, epidemiology, and survival ratio) and the result obtained through this research could be a magnificent approach in the advancement of drug delivery systems that could assist in clinical trials and further betterment of

Pharmacological Aspect

survival rate and improved therapy from this deadly cancer.

**Keywords:** category, symptoms, prognosis, pathophysiology, remedies,

As per the current study performed by the international agency for research on cancer (World Health Organization), the number of liver cancer cases reported all over the globe was 841,080, i.e., 4.7% of the total cancer cases in year 2018. As per the reports of the American Cancer Society, there is an estimation of 42,030 new cases of liver cancer diagnosed in the United States alone for the year 2019. Threefourths of those cases are of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is unquestionably the most serious and dreaded complication of chronic liver disease. The development of HCC is generally the terminal event of a long-standing, typically asymptomatic chronic liver disease, which originated decades earlier. Regardless of the etiology, the process begins with a frequently unrecognized acute or subacute liver insult that slowly advances to the development of cirrhosis, a potentially preneoplastic condition. Less commonly, HCC arises directly without antecedent cirrhosis. The average life expectancy after diagnosis of clinically apparent HCC is less than 12 months [1]. People with chronic liver diseases, such as cirrhosis caused by hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection, are most often prone to hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is traditionally related to liver cirrhosis and also with the ongoing process of liver necrosis or regeneration, where liver cirrhosis may be due

#### **Chapter 5**
