**Author details**

Sapir Handelman Minds of Peace and Achva Academic College, Israel

\*Address all correspondence to: sapir.handelman@gmail.com

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**295**

*Peace Revolution as a Three-Dimensional Process: The Israeli-Palestinian Case*

Palestinian-Israeli case. Middle East

Peacemaking in Israel-Palestine: Theory and Application. London and New York:

[12] Agassi J. Liberal Nationalism for Israel: Towards an Israeli National Identity. Jerusalem and New York: Gefen

[13] Kelman H. Social-psychological dimensions of international conflict. In: Zartman W, editor. Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods & Techniques (Rev. Ed.). Washington, DC:

[14] Kelman H. The Israeli-Palestinian peace process and its vicissitudes: Insights from attitude theory. American Psychologist. 2007b;**63**(4):287-303

[15] Bronfenbrenner U. The Mirror image in soviet-American relations: A social Psychologist's report. Journal of

[16] Kelman H. Negotiation as interactive

[18] Handelman S. Two complementary settings of Peacemaking diplomacy: Political-elite diplomacy and public diplomacy. Diplomacy & Statecraft.

[19] Sparks A. Tomorrow Is another Country: The Inside Story of South Africa's Negotiated Revolution. Sandton, South Africa: Struik Book Distributors;

Social Issues. 1961;**17**:45-56

Practice. 1996;**1**(1):99-123

1985;**8**(3):199-213

2012c;**23**(1):162-178

1994

problem solving. International Negotiation: A Journal of Theory and

[17] Gifford M. Managing Public Diplomacy. The Washington Quarterly.

U.S. Institute of Peace; 2007a

[11] Handelman S. Conflict and

Policy. 2008;**15**(3):57-66

Routledge; 2011

Pub. House; 1999

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90246*

[1] Galtung J. Peace, War and

Defense: Essays in Peace Research I1. Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers; 1976

[2] Kelman H. Conflict resolution and reconciliation: A social-psychological perspective on ending violent conflict between identity groups. Landscapes of Violence. 2010;**1**(1):5. Available from: http://scholarworks.umass.edu/lov/

[3] Snow D. Cases in International Relation. 4th ed. New York: Pearson—

[4] Popper K. Models, instruments and truth. In: Notturno M, editor. The Myth of the Framework: In Defense of Science and Rationality. London and New York: Routledge; 1994.

[5] Fisher R. The potential for

Change. 1993;**18**(3):247-266

2016;**28**(1):123-144

Martin's Press; 1996

Martin's Press; 1990

[8] James A. Peacekeeping in International Politics. New York: St.

views of Peacemaking: The

[9] Handelman S, Chowdhury J. The limits of political-elite diplomacy: Leaders, people and social conflicts. Israel Affairs. 2017;**23**(3):465-495

[10] Handelman S. Two complementary

[6] Handelman S. Peacemaking Contractualism: A Peacemaking approach to cope with difficult situations of intractable conflict. Global Change, Peace & Security.

Peacebuilding: Forging a bridge from peacekeeping to Peacemaking. Peace &

[7] Ratner S. The New UN Peacekeeping: Building Peace in Lands of Conflicts after the Cold War. New York: St.

**References**

vol1/iss

Longman; 2010

pp. 154-185

<sup>50</sup> For a thoughtful discussion on the very essence of complex phenomena, see Hayek [42].

*Peace Revolution as a Three-Dimensional Process: The Israeli-Palestinian Case DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90246*
