**3. Perspective and challenge**

For recent studies, innovative biopharmaceuticals are developing rapidly and have opened a new era for human therapy. Many researchers involve in the development of biopharmaceuticals and achieve exciting results. Biopharmaceuticals are promising for scientific perspectives and regulatory perspectives. Nonetheless, there are still some challenges including scientific issues and regulatory issues we need to overcome.

#### **3.1. Scientific issue**

Along with the advance of biotechnologies, more novel biopharmaceuticals are marketed and used for clinical application in the world. Biopharmaceuticals have been extensively applied for disease control, prevention, and diagnosis even though some scientific challenges are still unsolved. Take vaccines and gene therapies as examples to discuss as follows:

#### *3.1.1. Vaccine*

Vaccination, the administration of an antigenic material (vaccine), is considered to be the most effective strategies for disease control. Appropriate formulation and delivery of vaccines can maximize the potential advances for disease prevention. The main advantages of vaccination include the prevention in advance and the immunity for long term; the limitations are complex vaccination schedules, strict requirements for storage, and restricted routes of administration [12]. Nanotechnology is an approach to prepare a nanovaccine with the consumption and side effects significantly decreased. Through the application of nanoparticles, it is possible for vaccines to be controlled release at specific location, stable at room temperature, and have replaceable routes for administration. Vaccines based on nanotechnologies may overcome their limitations and result in the development of painless, safe, effective, and economic products. The major challenges are the toxicity of nanoparticles and the immune responses induced by nanoparticles, though some biodegradable and biocompatible nanoparticles have been developed [12].

Biotechnologies using recombinant DNA technologies, genetic engineering, and tissue culture encompass a wide range of procedures to modify living organisms for human uses. New vaccines employing biotechnologies improve the product quality and expand the clinical applications [13]. For example, traditional vaccines are only used to prevent infectious diseases, but vaccines based on biotechnologies are being developed to prevent many noninfectious diseases such as cancers, type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM), Alzheimer disease, drug addiction, etc. [13]. In addition, therapeutic vaccines are potentially developing for both infectious and noninfectious diseases using the biotechnologies such as reverse vaccinology, recombinant subunit vaccination, recombinant protein vaccination, DNA vaccination, and RNA vaccination. The major challenge is complex vaccination schedules. The vaccines based on biotechnologies are usually only parts of microorganisms (DNA, RNA, or protein); therefore, it is required to have multiple doses to induce additional "booster" shots for full immunity [13].

#### *3.1.2. Gene therapy*

inactivated microbes, live attenuated microbes, toxoids (toxins), and or part of surface antigens (subunits). Through vaccination, the burst of many infectious diseases has enormously been decreased such as measles, tetanus, and polio; some are even eradicated such as smallpox. However, the burden of noninfectious diseases such as cancers, cardiovascular diseases, metabolic diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases is significantly increasing. Currently, some vaccines are successfully applied to prevent cancers; for example, the human papilloma

In addition to clinic significance in therapy and prevention, some biopharmaceuticals can be used to diagnose diseases; for example, monoclonal antibodies have been successfully applied in the diagnosis of some cancers and infectious diseases, and more are being developed [9–11]. Once monoclonal antibodies specified for a given substance are produced, they can be used to detect the presence of this substance. They are also very useful in immunohistochemistry that detects antigens in fixed tissue sections and immunofluorescence tests that

For recent studies, innovative biopharmaceuticals are developing rapidly and have opened a new era for human therapy. Many researchers involve in the development of biopharmaceuticals and achieve exciting results. Biopharmaceuticals are promising for scientific perspectives and regulatory perspectives. Nonetheless, there are still some challenges including scientific

Along with the advance of biotechnologies, more novel biopharmaceuticals are marketed and used for clinical application in the world. Biopharmaceuticals have been extensively applied for disease control, prevention, and diagnosis even though some scientific challenges are still

Vaccination, the administration of an antigenic material (vaccine), is considered to be the most effective strategies for disease control. Appropriate formulation and delivery of vaccines can maximize the potential advances for disease prevention. The main advantages of vaccination include the prevention in advance and the immunity for long term; the limitations are complex vaccination schedules, strict requirements for storage, and restricted routes of administration [12]. Nanotechnology is an approach to prepare a nanovaccine with the consumption and side effects significantly decreased. Through the application of nanoparticles, it is possible for vaccines to be controlled release at specific location, stable at room temperature, and have replaceable routes for administration. Vaccines based on nanotechnologies may overcome

unsolved. Take vaccines and gene therapies as examples to discuss as follows:

virus (HPV) vaccine has been approved for the prevention of cervical cancers.

detect the substance in frozen tissue sections or in live cells.

issues and regulatory issues we need to overcome.

**3. Perspective and challenge**

**3.1. Scientific issue**

*3.1.1. Vaccine*

**2.3. Diagnosis**

6 Biopharmaceuticals

Although many CTPs have been approved for marketing in many countries and extensively used for disease treatment [1], current gene therapies predominantly exist in basic research laboratories and their clinical applications are still on trials. Despite of this, some GTPs have been approved by the EMA such as Glybera (alipogene tiparvovec) in 2012, and by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) such as Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) and Yescarta (axicabtagene ciloleucel) in 2017, respectively. Recently, gene therapies have become possible through the advances of genetic engineering technology that enabled the manipulation of genome and the development of delivery tools such as lipoids [2, 14], viruses [2, 14], nanoparticles [2, 14], bacteria [15], gene guns [16], electroporation [17], or nanostraws [18]. Therapeutic components must be transported to targeted cells to exert a therapeutic effect. Therefore, the delivery tool is essential for drug delivery to target cells and it is very crucial to select a suitable delivery tool with specificity, efficiency, safety, and economics. However, it is challenging for the option of delivery tools due to the following issues.


**4.** Economics: The research and development (R&D) of delivery tools is perhaps difficult, risky, costly, and time-consuming. Consequently, researchers, funders, and manufacturers must have enough incentives to develop delivery tools. In fact, most biotechnology companies have little incentive to discover novel delivery tools because of limited revenue and highly developmental risks.

safety and estimate their efficacy. For the therapy of patents, who are in serious conditions or unmet medical needs, specific CTPs or GTPs can be accessible to these patients with adaptive licensing [1]. The regulator should establish a conditional approval system in the regulation with deadline, a fast-track review, and communication mechanism to have patients in urgent

Introductory Chapter: Biopharmaceuticals http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79194 9

As products of living organisms, biopharmaceuticals are more complicated than small molecular-weight chemical drugs because of their sensitivity to manufacturing processes and posttranslational changes [24]. Most information on the manufacturing process is not fully open to the public, because it may be proprietary or a patent. This information gap stands for a critical challenge for biosimilar developers and plays a crucial role in explaining the differences in regulatory pathways. It is required to demonstrate biosimilarity and assure that the change in manufacturing process represents no effects on safety and efficacy. The extent of the change is usually a key indicator to the analysis required to evaluate the quality. Biosimilarity exercises have been addressed differently by regulators to realize that biosimilar developers begin with fundamental differences including culture media, purification processes, and formulations [24]. Therefore, it is required to ensure that the changes do not influence the efficacy and safety of biosimilars. Biosimilars are defined and present their financial and clinical implications in current publications, regulations, and the US FDA guidance documents [25]. Some biopharmaceuticals may be replaced with cheaper biosimilars when they lose the patent protection. However, unlike generic drugs, biosimilars are different from the reference products in structure and function. The US Biologics Price Competition and Innovation (BPCI) Act of 2009 created an abbreviated licensure pathway to allow for the development and approval of biosimilars and interchangeable reference products that are licensed [25, 26]. The US FDA can approve biosimilars via the abbreviated licensure pathway in accordance with the BPCI Act. Biosimilars approved in Europe are only composed of simple and small molecules. Complex and large-molecule biosimilars will be subjected to a more rigorous and prolonged approval processes [25]. The financial success of biopharmaceutical therapies and their patent expiration eventually result in the development of biosimilars. The pharmaceutical company has to develop complex biosimilars that mimic the original "innovator" drugs and explore analytical methods to demonstrate similarity to regulatory authorities [25]. A comment outlines the efforts of an integrated health system to ensure biosimilar accessibility and discusses the current challenges and future implications [27]. Biosimilars still confront regulatory challenges on potential implications for pricing, site of care, and pharmacy dispensing practices [27]. Generally, we believe that biosimilars are helpful to the health-care system, but their expected benefits may not be understood in the near future.

Biopharmaceuticals are very promising for disease control and prevention due to their characteristics and multiple advantages over traditional drugs. Many novel biopharmaceuticals

needs take specific CTPs or GTPs as soon as possible.

*3.2.2. Biosimilar*

**4. Conclusion**

In several recent studies, encouraging progresses have been made to possibly overcome the challenges of delivering GTPs *in vivo* [19–22] (**Table 3**).

#### **3.2. Regulatory issue**

Biopharmaceuticals are more complex than small molecular-weight drugs due to their biological source, large molecular size, structural complexity, and environmental sensitivity. Thus, it is essential to consider specific and special regulatory issues for the research, production, clinical trials, applications, and marketing of biopharmaceuticals, though many professional regulations and developmental frameworks have already been established. Take cell therapies and gene therapies, and biosimilars as examples to discuss as follows:

#### *3.2.1. Cell therapy and gene therapy*

CTPs and GTPs have the trend to be commodified because many manufacturers are aiming at pursuing commercial interests. Commercial promotion of unsupported therapeutic uses of CTPs and GTPs has become global challenges that have proven resistant to regulatory efforts. Some unapproved or unproved CTPs and GTPs are tried on patients only according to their indefinite perspectives. Some CTPs and GTPs which clinical trials or data are still incomplete are prematurely released on the market only due to significant interests. A coordinated approach at the national and international levels focused on engagement, harmonization, and enforcement must be implemented to reduce the risks related to direct consumer marketing of unapproved or unproven CTPs and GTPs [23]. However, in some cases, some CTPs or GTPs have not yet completed their efficacy validation, but they have enough data to verify their


**Table 3.** Possible strategies for overcoming the challenges for drug delivery (cited from **Table 3**. Potential Application of the CRISPR/Cas9 System against Herpesvirus Infections. Viruses. 2018 May 29;**10**(6). pii: E291).

safety and estimate their efficacy. For the therapy of patents, who are in serious conditions or unmet medical needs, specific CTPs or GTPs can be accessible to these patients with adaptive licensing [1]. The regulator should establish a conditional approval system in the regulation with deadline, a fast-track review, and communication mechanism to have patients in urgent needs take specific CTPs or GTPs as soon as possible.

#### *3.2.2. Biosimilar*

**4.** Economics: The research and development (R&D) of delivery tools is perhaps difficult, risky, costly, and time-consuming. Consequently, researchers, funders, and manufacturers must have enough incentives to develop delivery tools. In fact, most biotechnology companies have little incentive to discover novel delivery tools because of limited revenue

In several recent studies, encouraging progresses have been made to possibly overcome the

Biopharmaceuticals are more complex than small molecular-weight drugs due to their biological source, large molecular size, structural complexity, and environmental sensitivity. Thus, it is essential to consider specific and special regulatory issues for the research, production, clinical trials, applications, and marketing of biopharmaceuticals, though many professional regulations and developmental frameworks have already been established. Take cell thera-

CTPs and GTPs have the trend to be commodified because many manufacturers are aiming at pursuing commercial interests. Commercial promotion of unsupported therapeutic uses of CTPs and GTPs has become global challenges that have proven resistant to regulatory efforts. Some unapproved or unproved CTPs and GTPs are tried on patients only according to their indefinite perspectives. Some CTPs and GTPs which clinical trials or data are still incomplete are prematurely released on the market only due to significant interests. A coordinated approach at the national and international levels focused on engagement, harmonization, and enforcement must be implemented to reduce the risks related to direct consumer marketing of unapproved or unproven CTPs and GTPs [23]. However, in some cases, some CTPs or GTPs have not yet completed their efficacy validation, but they have enough data to verify their

pies and gene therapies, and biosimilars as examples to discuss as follows:

Specificity Discovery of a specific virus such as adeno-associated viruses (AAVs)

Biosafety Combination with several factors such as smaller Cas9 orthologues, tissue-specific minimal promoters, AAV serotypes, and different routes of administration;

Economics International collaboration among manufacturers and harmonization for product review and approval in different countries can raise the profits and reduce the expenses Abbreviation: clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs)/Cas9 nuclease system.

the CRISPR/Cas9 System against Herpesvirus Infections. Viruses. 2018 May 29;**10**(6). pii: E291).

**Table 3.** Possible strategies for overcoming the challenges for drug delivery (cited from **Table 3**. Potential Application of

Development of novel and safe delivery tools such as lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), AAVs, and

Efficiency Application of a combination system such as AAVs-CRISPRs

and highly developmental risks.

*3.2.1. Cell therapy and gene therapy*

**3.2. Regulatory issue**

8 Biopharmaceuticals

**Challenge Strategy**

baculoviruses

challenges of delivering GTPs *in vivo* [19–22] (**Table 3**).

As products of living organisms, biopharmaceuticals are more complicated than small molecular-weight chemical drugs because of their sensitivity to manufacturing processes and posttranslational changes [24]. Most information on the manufacturing process is not fully open to the public, because it may be proprietary or a patent. This information gap stands for a critical challenge for biosimilar developers and plays a crucial role in explaining the differences in regulatory pathways. It is required to demonstrate biosimilarity and assure that the change in manufacturing process represents no effects on safety and efficacy. The extent of the change is usually a key indicator to the analysis required to evaluate the quality. Biosimilarity exercises have been addressed differently by regulators to realize that biosimilar developers begin with fundamental differences including culture media, purification processes, and formulations [24]. Therefore, it is required to ensure that the changes do not influence the efficacy and safety of biosimilars.

Biosimilars are defined and present their financial and clinical implications in current publications, regulations, and the US FDA guidance documents [25]. Some biopharmaceuticals may be replaced with cheaper biosimilars when they lose the patent protection. However, unlike generic drugs, biosimilars are different from the reference products in structure and function. The US Biologics Price Competition and Innovation (BPCI) Act of 2009 created an abbreviated licensure pathway to allow for the development and approval of biosimilars and interchangeable reference products that are licensed [25, 26]. The US FDA can approve biosimilars via the abbreviated licensure pathway in accordance with the BPCI Act. Biosimilars approved in Europe are only composed of simple and small molecules. Complex and large-molecule biosimilars will be subjected to a more rigorous and prolonged approval processes [25]. The financial success of biopharmaceutical therapies and their patent expiration eventually result in the development of biosimilars. The pharmaceutical company has to develop complex biosimilars that mimic the original "innovator" drugs and explore analytical methods to demonstrate similarity to regulatory authorities [25]. A comment outlines the efforts of an integrated health system to ensure biosimilar accessibility and discusses the current challenges and future implications [27]. Biosimilars still confront regulatory challenges on potential implications for pricing, site of care, and pharmacy dispensing practices [27]. Generally, we believe that biosimilars are helpful to the health-care system, but their expected benefits may not be understood in the near future.

## **4. Conclusion**

Biopharmaceuticals are very promising for disease control and prevention due to their characteristics and multiple advantages over traditional drugs. Many novel biopharmaceuticals are being developed and may be applied for clinical application in the near future, though some scientific and regulatory issues are still unsolved. We expect research works including the discovery, production, applications, prospects, and challenges of biopharmaceuticals to gain the fruitful outcome and have a great impact over the humans. All prospects will come true and challenges will be overcome eventually if we constantly endeavor.

[9] Strati P, Jain N, O'Brien S. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2018;**93**(5):651-664. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.03.002

Introductory Chapter: Biopharmaceuticals http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79194 11

[10] Marr KA, Datta K, Mehta S, Ostrander DB, Rock M, Francis J, Feldmesser M. Urine antigen detection as an aid to diagnose invasive aspergillosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases.

[11] Phuong NH, Kwak C, Heo CK, Cho EW, Yang J, Poo H. Development and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against nucleoprotein for diagnosis of influenza A virus. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2018;**28**(5):809-815. DOI: 10.4014/jmb.

[12] Chen YC, Cheng HF, Yang YC, Yeh MK. Nanotechnologies applied in biomedical vaccines. In: Stanciu SG, editor. Micro and Nanotechnologies for Biotechnology. Rijeka,

[13] Chen YC, Cheng HF, Yang YC, Yeh MK. Biotechnologies applied in biomedical vaccines. In: Afrin F, Hemeg H, Ozbak H, editors. Vaccine. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2017.

[14] Das SK, Menezes ME, Bhatia S, Wang XY, Emdad L, Sarkar D, Fisher PB. Gene therapies for cancer: Strategies, challenges and successes. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2015;

[15] Bai Y, Gong H, Li H, Vu GP, Lu S, Liu F. Oral delivery of RNase P ribozymes by *Salmonella* inhibits viral infections in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the

[16] Gan WB, Grutzendler J, Wong WT, Wong RO, Lichtman JW. Multicolor "DiOlistic" labeling of the nervous system using lipophilic dye combinations. Neuron. 2000;**27**(2):219-225.

[17] Guo W, Guo Y, Tang S, Qu H, Zhao H.Dendritic cell-Ewing's sarcoma cell hybrids enhance antitumor immunity. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2008;**466**(9):2176-2183.

[18] Stewart MP, Sharei A, Ding X, Sahay G, Langer R, Jensen KF. *In vitro* and strategies for intracellular delivery. Nature. 2016;**538**(7624):183-192. DOI: 10.1038/nature19764

[19] Oggu GS, Sasikumar S, Reddy N, Ella KKR, Rao CM, Bokara KK. Gene delivery approaches for mesenchymal stem cell therapy: Strategies to increase efficiency and specificity. Stem Cell Reviews. 2017;**13**(6):725-740. DOI: 10.1007/s12015-017-9760-2 [20] Xiao Q, Min T, Ma S, Hu L, Chen H, Lu D. Intracellular generation of single-strand template increases the knock-in efficiency by combining CRISPR/Cas9 with AAV. Molecular

Genetics and Genomics. 2018;**293**(4):1051-1060. DOI: 10.1007/s00438-018-1437-2

[21] Finn JD, Smith AR, Patel MC, Shaw L, Youniss MR, van Heteren J, Dirstine T, Ciullo C, Lescarbeau R, Seitzer J, Shah RR, Shah A, Ling D, Growe J, Pink M, Rohde E, Wood KM, Salomon WE, Harrington WF, Dombrowski C, Strapps WR, Chang Y, Morrissey DV. A

United States of America. 2011;**108**(8):3222-3227. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1014975108

2018. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy326. [Epub ahead of print]

Croatia: InTech; 2016. pp. 85-105. DOI: 10.5772/63453

pp. 97-110. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.69547

**230**(2):259-271. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.24791

DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00031-3

DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0348-7

1801.01002
