**6. Conclusion**

While patient safety events, including the so-called "never events" can occur within the realm of pathology practice, the research and implications involving pathology remain limited and in early stages [10]. Errors that result in missed diagnoses, wrong site procedures, or falsepositive interpretations continue to cause profound physical injury and psychological trauma for the patients, and deeply affect involved providers, teams, and institutions. Consequently, pathologists must engage in a concerted effort to build and embrace mechanisms for high reliability specimen and data processing, verification and cross checks involving diagnostic interpretations, efficient event reporting, outstanding communication, and excellent coordination involving both internal and external interactions. This, in turn, will lead to better and safer pathology systems of the future.

[6] Mulloy DF, Hughes RG. Wrong-site surgery: A preventable medical error. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rock-

Patient Safety Issues in Pathology: From Mislabeled Specimens to Interpretation Errors

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79634

155

[7] Spath PL. In: Spath PL, editor. Error Reduction in Health Care: A Systems Approach to

[8] Nakhleh RE. Patient safety and error reduction in surgical pathology. Archives of

[9] Tworek JA et al. Q-probes studies in anatomic pathology: Quality improvement through targeted benchmarking. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2014;**138**(9):

[10] Laposata M, Cohen MB. It's our turn: Implications for pathology from the Institute of Medicine's report on diagnostic error. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.

[11] Cohen MB, Schmidt RL. Diagnostic error in anatomic pathology. Archives of Pathology

[12] Meier FA. The Landscape of Error in Surgical Pathology. Error Reduction and Prevention

[13] College of American Pathologists, Valenstein PN, Raab SS, Walsh MK. Identification errors involving clinical laboratories: A College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of patient and specimen identification errors at 120 institutions. Archives of Pathology &

[14] Troxel DB.Medicolegal aspects of error in pathology. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory

[15] Zarbo RJ, Meier FA, Raab SS. Error detection in anatomic pathology. Archives of Patho-

[16] Shahar T et al. Conflicting pathology reports: A diagnostic dilemma. Journal of Neuro-

[17] Stawicki S et al. Fundamentals of Patient Safety in Medicine and Surgery. New Delhi:

[18] Stawicki SP, Firstenberg MS. Introductory chapter: The decades long quest continues toward better, safer healthcare systems. In: Vignettes in Patient Safety. Vol. 1. InTech;

[19] Tolentino JC et al. Introductory chapter: Developing patient safety champions. In:

[20] Kornstein MJ, Byrne SP.The medicolegal aspect of error in pathology: A search of jury verdicts and settlements. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2007;**131**(4):615-618

[21] Layfield LJ, Anderson GM. Specimen labeling errors in surgical pathology: An 18-month

experience. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2010;**134**(3):466-470

Improving Patient Safety. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2011

Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2008;**132**(2):181-185

in Surigcal Pathology. Detroit, MI: Springer Science; 2015

ville (MD); 2008

1156-1166

2016;**140**(6):505-507

& Laboratory Medicine. 2016;**140**(1):9

Laboratory Medicine. 2006;**130**(8):1106-1113

Wolters Kluwer Health (India) Pvt Ltd; 2014

logy & Laboratory Medicine. 2005;**129**(10):1237-1245

Vignettes in Patient Safety. Vol. 2. Rijeka: InTech; 2018

Medicine. 2006;**130**(5):617-619

surgery. 2015;**122**(2):276-279

2017
