**6. References**

Alberta L, Sweeney SM, Wiss K. Diaper Dye Dermatitis. Pediatrics.2005; 116: e450-2. Al-Faraidy NA, Al-Natour SH. A forgotten complication of diaper dermatitis: Granuloma

gluteale infantum. Journal of Family and Community Medicine. 2010; 17: 107-9. Allen P. Tea tree oil: the science behind the antimicrobial hype. The Lancet. 2001; 358: 1245.

Face Topical pharmaceuticals (benzoyl peroxide,

Ears Otic preparations (thimerosal, neomycin),

Wrists Nickel, cobalt, potassium dichromate Hands Nickel, cobalt, rubber additives (including

Arms Vaccines (mercury, thimerosal),

Diaper area Topical pharmaceuticals (neomycin,

Table 4. Patterns of Localization of Allergic Contact Dermatitis and Their Respective

Alberta L, Sweeney SM, Wiss K. Diaper Dye Dermatitis. Pediatrics.2005; 116: e450-2.

Al-Faraidy NA, Al-Natour SH. A forgotten complication of diaper dermatitis: Granuloma gluteale infantum. Journal of Family and Community Medicine. 2010; 17: 107-9. Allen P. Tea tree oil: the science behind the antimicrobial hype. The Lancet. 2001; 358: 1245.

Trunk, Extremities PPD, clothing dyes, sunscreen allergens,

As clinicians begin to recognize the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis in children, they should also appreciate that the approach to this disease must be different than in adults. The allergens to which children are exposed are often not the same as those that can affect adults. The use of patch testing may be helpful in this age group, but may need to be modified to evaluate for the most clinically relevant allergens. The body of research that is conducted in this area of dermatology continues to grow and it seems likely that our understanding of allergic contact dermatitis in children will continue to advance as will our ability to diagnose and manage this condition. In particular, further epidemiologic studies in asymptomatic patients that focus on the relevance of positive patch test results will be

plants

Feet Potassium dichromate

Periumbilical Nickel

Allergens.

helpful.

**6. References** 

**5. Conclusion** 

amalgam fillings (mercury), flavoring

sunscreen allergens), fragrances including

thiuram and PPD), plants (Rhus)

hyposensitization therapy (aluminum),

ethylenediamine), rubber additives

agents (cinnamic aldehyde)

balsam of peru, nickel

sunscreen allergens

thimerosal)

nickel, cobalt

Perioral Nickel, potassium dichromate, cobalt,

Periorbital Ophthalmic preparations (mercury,

Neck Nickel, fragrance


Contact Dermatitis in Children 145

Grimm I. Unusual form of a contact dermatitis due to cobalt in an 11-year-old child.

Hausen BM, Reichling J, Harkenthal M. Degradation products of monoterpenes are the

Heim KE, McKean BA. Children's clothing fasteners as a potential source of exposure to

Heine G, Schnuch A, Uter W, Worm M. Frequency of contact allergy in German children

Hemmer W, Focke M, Wantke F, Gotz M, Jarisch R. Contact hypersensitivity to iron. Contact

Hjorth N. Contact dermatitis in children. Actadermato-venereologica (Stockh). 1981; 95:

Hogeling M, Pratt M. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: the Ottawa hospital patch-

Hsu JW, Matiz C, Jacob SE. Nickel Allergy: Localized, Id, and Systemic Manifestations in

Jacob SE, Brod B, Crawford GH. Clinically Relevant Patch Test Reactions in Children – A

Jensen CS, Lisby S, Baadsgaard O, Volund A, Menne T. Decrease in nickel sensitization in a

Jones HE, Lewis CW, McMarlin SL. Allergic contact sensitivity in atopic dermatitis.

Jovanovic DL, Slavkovi-Jovanovic MR. Allergic contact dermatitis from temporary henna

Kalish RS. Recent Developments in the Pathogenesis of Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Kanerva L, Kerosuo H, Kullaa A, Kerosuo E. Allergic patch test reactions to palladium

Kerosuo H, Kullaa A, Kerosuo E, Kanerva L, Hensten-Pettersen A. Nickel allergy in

Kohl L, Blondeel A, Song M. Allergic contact dermatitis from cosmetics. Retrospective

Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1996; 109: 148-54.

analysis of 819 patch-tested patients. Dermatology. 2002; 204: 334-7.

adolescents in relation to orthodontic treatment and piercing of ears. American

chloride in schoolchildren. Contact Dermatitis. 1996; 34: 39-42.

Kligman AM. The myth of lanolin allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 1998; 39: 103-7.

exposure regulation. British Journal of Dermatology. 2002; 146: 636-42. Johansen JD. Contact allergy to fragrances: clinical and experimental investigations of the fragrance mix and its ingredients. Contact Dermatitis. 2002; 46 Suppl 3: 1-31. Johnke H, Norberg LA, Vach W, Bindslev-Jensen C, Host A, Andersen KE. Reactivity to

Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced after implementation of nickel-

patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants. Contact Dermatitis.

testing clinic experience, 1996 to 2006. Dermatitis. 2008; 19: 86-89.

United States Based Study. Pediatric Dermatology. 2008; 25: 520-7.

sensitizing agents in tea tree oil. American Journal of Contact Dermatitis. 1999; 10:

and adolescents patch tested between 1995 and 2002: results from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology and the German Contact Dermatitis

Goossens A. The allergens in children. Contact Dermatitis. 2008; 58 Suppl 1: 9-30.

releasable nickel ions. Contact Dermatitis. 2009; 60: 100-5.

Research Group. Contact Dermatitis. 2004; 51: 111-7.

Children. Pediatric Dermatology. 2011; 28: 276-80.

Archives of Dermatology. 1973; 107: 217-22.

tattoo. Journal of Dermatology. 2009; 36: 63-5.

Archives of Dermatology. 1991; 127: 1558-63.

Berufsdermatosen. 1971; 19: 39-42.

Dermatitis. 1996; 34: 219-20.

68-77.

36-9.

2004; 51: 141-7.


Cook N, Freeman S. Photosensitive dermatitis due to sunscreen allergy in a child.

Cunha AP, Mota AV, Barros MA, Bonito-Victor A, Resende C. Corticosteroid contact allergy

Delplace D, Blondeel A. Octocrylene: really non-allergenic? Contact Dermatitis. 2006; 54:

deWaard-van der Spek FB, Oranje AP. Allergic contact dermatitis to chlorhexadine and

deWaard-van der Spek FB, Oranje AP. Patch tests in children with suspected allergic contact

Dotterud LK, Falk ES. Metal allergy in north Norwegian schoolchildren and its relationship

Dotterud LK, Falk ES. Contact allergy in relation to hand eczema and atopic diseases in

Duarte I, Lazzarini R, Kobata CM. Contact dermatitis in adolescents. American Journal of

Edman B. Sites of contact dermatitis in relationship to particular allergens. Contact

Epstein S, Mohajerin AH. Incidence of Contact Sensitivity in Atopic Dermatitis. Archives of

Farage MA, Berardesca E, Maibach H. The possible relevance of sex hormones on irritant

Fernandez Vozmediano JM, Armario Hita JC. Allergic contact dermatitis in children. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2005; 19: 42-6.

Flohr C, Ravenscroft J, English J. Compositae allergy in three children with hand dermatitis.

Gach JE, Tucker W, Hill VA. Three cases of severe Rhus dermatitis in an English primary

Giordano-Labadie F, Rance F, Pellegrin F, Bazex J, Dutau G, Schwarze HP. Prevalence of

Goncalo S, Goncalo M, Azenha A, Barros MA, Bastos AS, Brandao FM, et al. Allergic contact

Goon AT, Goh C. Patch Testing of Singapore Children and Adolescents: Our Experience

school. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2006;

contact allergy in children with atopic dermatitis: results of a prospective study of

dermatitis in children. A multicenter study of the Portuguese Contact Dermatitis

Fisher AA. Allergic contact dermatitis in early infancy. Cutis. 1994; 54: 300-2. Fisher AA. Childhood allergic contact dermatitis. Cutis. 1975; 15: 635-42. Fisher AA. Cosmetic dermatitis in childhood. Cutis. 1995; 55: 15-6.

and allergic responses: their importance for skin testing. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;

with ear piercing and atopy. Contact Dermatitis. 1994; 31: 303-13

north Norwegian schoolchildren. Actapaediatrica. 1995; 84: 402-6.

para-amino compounds in a 4-year-old boy: a very rare observation. Contact

dermatitis: a prospective study and review of the literature. Dermatology. 2009;

Australasian Journal of Dermatology. 2002; 43: 133-5.

295.

218: 119-225

62: 67-74.

20: 212-3.

Dermatitis. 2008; 58: 239-41.

Contact Dermatitis. 2003; 14: 200-2.

Dermatitis. 1985; 13: 129-35.

Dermatology. 1964; 90: 284-7.

Contact Dermatitis. 2008; 59: 370.

Freeman S. Shoe dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1997; 36: 247-51.

137 cases. Contact Dermatitis. 1999; 40: 192-5.

Group (GPEDC). Contact Dermatitis. 1993; 26: 112-5.

over 18 Years. Pediatric Dermatology. 2006; 23: 117-20.

from a nasal spray in a child. Contact Dermatitis. 2003; 48: 277.

Goossens A. The allergens in children. Contact Dermatitis. 2008; 58 Suppl 1: 9-30.


Contact Dermatitis in Children 147

Mendenhall RC, Ramsay DL, Girard RA, DeFlorio GP, Weary PE, Lloyd JS. A study of the

Milingou M, Tagka A, Armenaka M, Kimouri K, Kouismintzis D, Katsarou A. Patch tests in

Modjtahedi BS, Modjtahedi SP, Maibach HI. The sex of the individual as a factor in allergic

Mortz CG, Andersen KE. Allergic contact dermatitis in children and adolescents. Contact

Mortz CG, Lauritsen JM, Bindslev-Jensen C, Andersen KE. Contact Allergy and Allergic

Moustafa M, Holden CR, Athavale P, Cork MJ, Messenger AG, Gawkrodger DJ. Patch

Motolese A, Manzini BM, Donini M. Patch testing in infants. American Journal of Contact

Netterlid E, Hindsen M, Bjork J, Ekovist S, Guner N, Henricson KA, Bruze M. There is an

Oestmann E, Phillipp S, Zuberbier T, Worm M. Colophony-induced contact dermatitis due

Ogra PL, Welliver RC. Effects of early environment on mucosal immunologic homeostasis,

Patrizi A, Rizzoli L, Vincenzi C, Trevisi P, Tosti A. Sensitization to thimerosal in atopic

Paulsen E, Otkjjaer A, Andersen KE. Sesquiterpene lactone dermatitis in the young: is atopy

Pevny I, Brennenstuhl M, Razinskas G. Patch testing in children. (I) Collective test results;

Pigatto P, Martelli A, Marsili C, Fiocchi A. Contact Dermatitis in Children. Italian Journal of

Placucci F, Vincenzi C, Ghedini G, Piana G, Tosti A. Coexistence of type 1 and type 4 allergy

skin testability in children. Contact Dermatitis. 1984; 11: 201-6.

O'Hagan AH, Bingham EA. Cellist's finger dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2001; 45: 319. Osawa J, Kitamura K, Ikezawa Z, Nakajima H. A probable role for vaccines containing thiomersal in thiomersalhypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis. 1991; 24: 178-82. Paradisi A, Capizzi R, Ghitti F, Lanza-Silveri S, Rendeli C, Guerriero C. Jacquet erosive

to ECG electrodes in an infant. Contact Dermatitis. 2007; 56: 177-8.

Dermatology. 1973; 114: 1456-62

Dermatitis. 1999; 41: 121-30.

Dermatitis. 1995; 6: 153-6.

2011 Apr 19.

2009; 60: 41-9

2009; 34: e385-6.

Pediatrics. 2010; 36: 2.

Pediatric Dermatology. 2010; 27: 255-9.

ActaDermato-Venereologica. 2002; 82: 352-8

Series. Paediatricprogramme. 2008; 61: 145-81.

children. Contact Dermatitis. 1990; 40: 94-7.

a risk factor? Contact Dermatitis. 2008; 59: 1-6.

to rubber latex. Contact Dermatitis. 1996; 34: 118.

contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2004; 50: 53-9.

practice of dermatology in the United States. Initial findings. Archives of

children: a review of 13 years of experience in comparison with previous data.

Contact Dermatitis in Adolescents: Prevalence Measures and Associations.

testing is a useful investigation in children with eczema. Contact Dermatitis. Epub

association between contact allergy to aluminum and persistent subcutaneous nodules in children undergoing hyposensitization therapy. Contact Dermatitis.

subsequent immune responses and disease outcome. Nestle Nutrition Workshop

diaper dermatitis: a therapeutic challenge. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology.


Koning H, Baert MRM., Oranje AP, Savelkoul HF, Neijeng HJ. Development of immune

Koo B, Leib JA, Garzon MC, Morel KD. Five-year-old Body with a Diffuse Erythematous

Kuiters GR, Smitt JH, Cohen EB, Bos JD. Allergic contact dermatitis in children and young

Kutting B, Brehler R, Traupe H. Allergic contact dermatitis in children – strategies of

Kwangsukstith C, Maibach HI. Effect of age and sex on the induction and elicitation of

Lammintausta K, Kalimo K, Fagerlund VL. Patch test reactions in atopic patients. Contact

Larsson-Stymne B, Widstrom L. Ear piercing – a cause of nickel allergy in schoolgirls?

Le Corre Y, Barbarot S, Frot AS, Milpied B. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Chlorhexidine in a

Lerch M, Bircher AJ. Systemically induced allergic exanthem from mercury. Contact

Leung AKC, Robson LM. Factitious Dermatitis: Lip Licker's Dermatitis. Consultant 360.

Lewis VJ, Statham BN, Chowdhury MMU. Allergic contact dermatitis in 191 consecutively

Leyden JJ, Kligman AM. Contact dermatitis to neomycin sulfate. Journal of the American

Lisi P, Brunelli L, Stingeni L. Co-sensitivity between cobalt and other transition metals.

Luigi A, Massimiliano N, Suppa F. Contact sensitivity to budesonide in a child. Contact

Manzini BM, Ferdani G, Simonetti V, Donini M, Seidenari S. Contact Sensitization in

Marcussen PV. Primary Irritant Patch-Test Reactions in Children. Archives of

Marks JG, DeLeo VA. Contact and Occupational Dermatology. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby;

Matiz C, Russell K, Jacob SE. The Importance of Checking for Delayed Reactions in Pediatric

Matiz C, Hsu JW, Paz Castanedo-Tardan M, Jacob SE. Allergic contact dermatitis in

Matiz C, Jacob SE. The lanolin paradox revisited. Journal of American Academy of

children: a review of international studies. GionaleItaliano di dermatologia e

rash with Black Crusts. Pediatric Dermatology. 2010; 27: 395-6.

allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1995; 33: 289-98.

Very Young Child. Pediatric Dermatology. 2010; 27: 485-7.

patch tested children. Contact Dermatitis. 2004; 51: 155-6.

adults. Archives of Dermatology. 1989; 125: 1531-3.

1996; 40: 363-75.

Dermatitis. 1992; 26: 234-40.

Dermatitis. 2004; 50: 349-53.

2005; 45: 2.

1997.

Contact Dermatitis. 1985; 13: 289-93.

Medical Association. 1979; 242: 1276-8.

Children. Pediatric Dermatology. 1998; 15: 12-17.

Patch Testing. Pediatric Dermatology. 2011; 28: 12-4.

Contact Dermatitis. 2003; 48: 172-3.

Dermatitis. 2000; 42: 359.

Dermatology.1963; 87: 378-82.

venereologia. 2009; 144: 541-56.

Dermatology. 2010; 64: 197.

functions related to allergic mechanisms in young children. Pediatric Research.

prevention and risk management. European Journal of Dermatology. 2004; 14: 80-5.


Contact Dermatitis in Children 149

Sharma VK, Asati DP. Pediatric contact dermatitis. Indian Journal of Dermatology,

Sidwell RU, Francis ND, Basarab T, Morar N. Vesicular Erythema Multiforme-like

Silverberg NB, Licht J, Friedler S, Sethi S, Laude T. Nickel Contact Hypersensitivity in

Smith WJ, Jacob SE. The role of allergic contact dermatitis in diaper dermatitis. Pediatric

Smith-Sivertsen T, Dotterud LK, Lung E. Nickel allergy and its relationship with local nickel

Straus HW. Artificial Sensitization of Infants to Poison Ivy. Journal of Allergy. 1931; 2:

Temesvari E, Racz I. Nickel sensitivity from dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis. 1988; 18:

Uhr J, Dancis J, Ghantz Newmann C. Delayed Hypersensitivity in Premature Neonatal

Van Hoogstraten IMW, Andersen KE, Von Blombert BME, Boden D, Bruynzeel DP, Burrows

Veien NK, Borchorst E, Hattel T, Laurberg G. Stomatitis or systemically-induced contact

Veien NK, Hattel T, Justesen O, Norholm A. Contact dermatitis in children. Contact

Wantke F, Hemmer W, Jarisch R, Gotz M. Patch test reactions in children, adults and the

Warshaw EM, Nelsen DD, Maibach HI, Marks JG, Zug KA, Taylor JS. Positive patch test

Weston WL, Weston JA, Kinoshita J, Kloepfer S, Carreon L, Toth S, et al. Prevalence of

Wilkowska A, Grubska-Suchanek E, Karwacka I, Szarmach H. Contact allergy in children.

Wohrl S, Hemmer W, Focke M, Gotz M, Jarisch R. Patch Testing in Children, Adults, and the

Wolf G, Hoger PH. Hypoallergenic and non-toxic emollient therapies for children. Journal

der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft. 2009; 7: 50-60.

age. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 1991; 85: 441-5.

dermatitis group, 1994 to 2006. Dermatitis. 2009; 20: 79-88.

D, et al. Reduced frequency of nickel allergy upon oral nickel contact at an early

dermatitis from metal wire in orthodontic materials. Contact Dermatitis. 1994; 30:

elderly. A comparative study in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis.

reactions to lanolin: cross-sectional data from the North American contact

positive epicutaneous tests among infants, children and adolescents. Pediatrics.

Elderly: Influence of Age and Sex on Sensitization Patterns. Pediatric Dermatology.

Reaction to Para-Phenylenediamine in a Henna Tattoo. Pediatric Dermatology.

pollution, ear piercing, and atopic dermatitis: A population-based study from Norway. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.1999; 40: 726-35. Stables GI, Forsyth A, Lever RS. Patch testing in children. Contact Dermatitis. 1996; 34:

Venereology and Leprology. 2010; 76: 514-20.

Children. Pediatric Dermatology. 2002; 19: 110-3.

2008; 25: 201-4.

341-4.

137-46.

50-1.

210-3.

Dermatology. 2003; 26: 369-70.

Humans. Nature. 1960; 187:1130-1.

Contact Dermatitis. 1996; 34: 316-9.

Dermatitis. 1982; 8: 373-5

1986; 78: 1070-4.

2003; 20: 119-23.

Cutis. 1996; 58: 176-80.


Prasad HRY, Srivastava P, Verma KK. Diaper dermatitis – An overview. Indian Journal of

Rademaker M, Duffill MB. Allergic contact dermatitis to Toxicodendron succedaneum (rhus tress): an autumn epidemic. New Zealand Medical Journal. 1995; 108: 121-3. Rademaker M, Forsyth A. Contact dermatitis in children. Contact Dermatitis. 1989; 20:

Rastogi SC, Johansen JD, Menne T, Frosch P, Bruze M, Andersen KE, et al. Contents of

Rietschel RL, Fowler JF. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. 6th ed. Ontario: BC Decker, Inc; 2008. Robson KJ, Maughan JA, Purcell SD, Petersen MJ, Haefner HK, Lowe L. Erosive

Romaguera C, Vilaplana J. Contact dermatitis in children: 6 years experience. Contact

Roul S, Ducombs G, Leaute-Labreze C, Taieb A. 'Lucky Luke' contact dermatitis due to

Roul S, Ducombs G, Taieb A. Usefulness of the European standard series for patch testing in

Ruseler-van Embden JGH, van Lieshout LMC, Smits SA, van Kessel I, Laman JD. Potato

Sarma N, Ghosh S. Clinico-allergological pattern of allergic contact dermatitis among 70

Schafter T, Enders F, Przybilla B. Sensitization to thimerosal and previous vaccination.

Scheinfeld N. Diaper dermatitis: a review and brief survey of eruptions of the diaper area.

Seidenari S, Giusti F, Pepe P, Mantovani L. Contact Sensitization in 1094 Children

Seidenari S, Manzini BM, Motolese A. Contact sensitization in infants: report of 3 cases.

Sevila A, Romaguera C, Vilaplana J, Botella R. Contact dermatitis in children. Contact

Sfia M, Dhaoui MA, Doss N. Consort allergic dermatitis to cosmetic agents in a 10-year-old

Shah M, Lewis FM, Gawkrodger DJ. Patch testing in children and adolescents: five years'

experience and follow-up. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1997;

American journal of clinical dermatology. 2005; 6: 273-81.

tuber proteins efficiently inhibit human faecal proteolytic activity: implications for treatment of peri-anal dermatitis. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2004;

Indian children. Indian Journal of Dermatology,Venereology and Leprology. 2010;

Undergoing Patch Testing over a 7-year Period. Pediatric Dermatology. 2005; 22:

rubber components of diapers. Contact Dermatitis. 1998; 38: 363-4.

Academy of Dermatology. 2006; 55 Suppl 5: S74-80.

children. Contact Dermatitis. 1990; 40: 232-5.

Contact Dermatitis. 1995; 32: 114-6.

Contact Dermatitis. 1992; 27: 319-20.

young girl. Contact Dermatitis. 2007; 57: 56-7.

Dermatitis. 1994; 30: 292-4.

fragrance allergens in chidren's cosmetics and cosmetic-toys. Contact Dermatitis.

papulonodular dermatosis associated with topical benzocaine: A report of two cases and evidence that granuloma gluteale, pseudoverrucous papules, and Jacquet's erosive dermatitis are a disease spectrum. Journal of the American

Pediatrics. 2003; 70: 635-7.

Dermatitis. 1998; 39: 277-80

104-7.

1999; 41: 84-8.

34: 303-11.

76: 38-44.

1-5.

37: 964-8.


Wolf R, Wolf D, Tuzun B, Tuzun Y. Diaper dermatitis. Clinics in Dermatology. 2000; 18: 657-

Worm M, Aberer W, Agathos M, Becker D, Brasch J, Fuchs T, et al. Patch testing in children

Journal of the German Society of Dermatology. 2007; 5: 107-9.

– recommendations of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).

660.
