Kentaro Shirotsuki

[36] Kashdan TB, Goodman FR, Machell KA, Kleiman EM, Monfort SS, Ciarrochi J, et al. A contextual approach to experiential avoidance and social anxiety: Evidence from an experimental interaction and daily interactions of people with social anxiety disorder.

[37] Kashdan TB, Volkmann JR, Breen WE, Han S. Social anxiety and romantic relationships: The costs and benefits of negative emotion expression are context-dependent. Journal of

[38] Wenzel A, Graff-Dolezal J, Macho M, Brendle JR. Communication and social skills in socially anxious and nonanxious individuals in the context of romantic relationships.

[39] First MB, Williams JBW, Karg RS, Spitzer RL. User's Guide for the SCID-5-CV Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5® Disorders: Clinical Version. Arlington, VA, USA:

[40] Klaghofer R, Brähler E. Konstruktion und teststatistische Prüfung einer Kurzform der SCL-90-R. Zeitschrift für klinische Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie.

[41] DeRogatis LR. SCL-90-R: Administration, Scoring and Procedures Manual for the R (Evised) Version and Other Instruments of the Psychopathology Rating Scale Series.

[42] DeRogatis LR. Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, Scoring, and Procedures

[43] Rytwinski NK, Fresco DM, Heimberg RG, Coles ME, Liebowitz MR, Cissell S, et al. Screening for social anxiety disorder with the self-report version of the Liebowitz social

[44] Stangier U, Heidenreich T, Berardi A, Golbs U, Hoyer J. Die Erfassung sozialer Phobie durch die social interaction anxiety scale (SIAS) und die social phobia scale (SPS).

[45] Heimberg RG, Mueller GP, Holt CS, Hope DA, Liebowitz MR. Assessment of anxiety in social interaction and being observed by others: The social interaction anxiety scale and

[46] Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring

[47] Grosse Holtforth M, Grawe K, Tamcan Ö. Inkongruence Questionnaire [Inkongruen-

[48] Vonken MJ, Alden LE, Bögels SM, Roelofs J. Social rejection in social anxiety disorder: The role of performance deficits. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2008;**47**:439-450

Emotion. 2014;**14**(4):769-781

64 Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Clinical Applications

2001;**49**:115-124

Anxiety Disorders. 2007;**21**(4):475-492

Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2005;**43**(4):505-519

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2016

Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research; 1983

Manual. Minneapolis, MS: National Computer Systems; 1993

anxiety scale. Depression and Anxiety. 2009;**26**(1):34-38

the social phobia scale. Behavior Therapy. 1992;**23**(1):53-73

depression (BDI). Archives of General Psychiatry. 1961;**4**:561-571

Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie. 1999;**28**:28-36

zfragebogen, INK]. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2004

Additional information is available at the end of the chapter Kentaro Shirotsuki

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71278 Additional information is available at the end of the chapter

### Abstract

The effectiveness of video feedback in socially anxious individuals including the improvement of distorted self-perceptions has been reported. However, socially anxious individuals might overestimate their appearance on video as more negative or less positive. Such misjudgments might be caused by excessively high negative interpretations and lack of positive interpretations in patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD). The results of this study suggest that a person's interpretations of his or her appearance on video interfere with the effectiveness of video feedback. The significance of these findings and techniques for improving cognitive interventions using video feedback are discussed.

Keywords: social anxiety disorder, video feedback, self-perception
