**Fabrication and Properties of Rubber Nanofiber from Electrospinning**

Wirach Taweepreda

Additional information is available at the end of the chapter

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69373

#### **Abstract**

Electrospun nanofibers of rubber blending with poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) were pre‐ pared by electrospinning. Various concentrations of rubber solution were added to the PVC solution for several purposes of the electrospun nanofibers. The pristine and rubber plasticized nanofibers were characterized by field emission scanning electron micros‐ copy (FE‐SEM), differential thermal analysis (DTA), and thermogravimetry analysis (TGA), respectively. Thermal properties from DTA and TGA results indicated that the addition of rubber decreased glass transition temperature (*T*<sup>g</sup> ) of PVC and increased heat resistance of PVC nanofiber. The dielectric constant of plasticized nanofibers measured using precision LCR meter indicated that the membranes were dense.

**Keywords:** PVC, rubber, electrospinning, nanofiber

## **1. Introduction**

#### **1.1. Elastomeric materials**

Elastomers are important polymers having various applications in daily life. Elastomers can be classified by application purposes such as general and special. Elastomers are often mixed together to achieve superior properties which arise from the individual systems. Blending is macroscopically homogeneous mixture of two or more different species of polymers which is carried out for several purposes [1], such as improving the physical and mechanical proper‐ ties of the first elastomer and obtaining good processing characteristics of rubber compound. The most important characteristic of a blending of two (or more) polymers is the phase behav‐ ior. Polymer blends (like low‐molecular‐weight solvents) can exhibit miscibility or phase sep‐ aration and various levels of mixing in between the extremes and polymer blends as a mixture

© 2017 The Author(s). Licensee InTech. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

of at least two macromolecular substances, polymer, or copolymer, in which the ingredient content is above 2 wt% [2].

**Epoxidized natural rubber (ENR)** is a modified molecule of natural rubber with the chemical name cis‐1,4polyisoprene. There structuring using chemicals such as peroxy acid will react with double bonds of the natural rubber molecules to form ring oxygen that is replaced; the epoxidation reaction of natural rubber is shown in **Figure 1**. In the beginning, formic acid reacts with hydrogen peroxide to form peroxy formic acid [3, 4]. Then, the peroxy formic acid reacts with double bond of natural rubber is arranged as a ring epoxide and formic acid is a by‐product as shown in **Figure 1**.

However, only three types of ENR are considered as commercial standard. These are ENR‐10, ENR‐25, and ENR‐50 where the integers designate 10, 25, and 50 mole% of epoxide incorpo‐ rated into the natural rubber chain, respectively [4, 5].

Besides the proposed commercial uses shown, ENR has the potential to be further exploited for its usage as advanced materials such as in blends, additives, and fuel cells applications [6]. ENR had been blended with various polymers such as natural rubber [7, 8], styrene‐butadiene rubber (SBR) [9], and poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) [10–12].

**Polyurethane (PU)** is formed by reacting an isocyanate with a polyol. Both the isocyanates and polyols used to make polyurethanes contain on average two or more functional groups per molecule. Most polyurethanes are thermosetting polymers that do not melt when heated.

**Figure 1.** The reaction epoxidation of natural rubber.

Polyurethane has the flexibility and strength of rubber and the hardness of plastic. Many com‐ mercially available PU can be used to make good electrospinning solutions.

## **1.2. Electrospinning**

of at least two macromolecular substances, polymer, or copolymer, in which the ingredient

**Epoxidized natural rubber (ENR)** is a modified molecule of natural rubber with the chemical name cis‐1,4polyisoprene. There structuring using chemicals such as peroxy acid will react with double bonds of the natural rubber molecules to form ring oxygen that is replaced; the epoxidation reaction of natural rubber is shown in **Figure 1**. In the beginning, formic acid reacts with hydrogen peroxide to form peroxy formic acid [3, 4]. Then, the peroxy formic acid reacts with double bond of natural rubber is arranged as a ring epoxide and formic acid is a

However, only three types of ENR are considered as commercial standard. These are ENR‐10, ENR‐25, and ENR‐50 where the integers designate 10, 25, and 50 mole% of epoxide incorpo‐

Besides the proposed commercial uses shown, ENR has the potential to be further exploited for its usage as advanced materials such as in blends, additives, and fuel cells applications [6]. ENR had been blended with various polymers such as natural rubber [7, 8], styrene‐butadiene

**Polyurethane (PU)** is formed by reacting an isocyanate with a polyol. Both the isocyanates and polyols used to make polyurethanes contain on average two or more functional groups per molecule. Most polyurethanes are thermosetting polymers that do not melt when heated.

content is above 2 wt% [2].

122 Elastomers

by‐product as shown in **Figure 1**.

rated into the natural rubber chain, respectively [4, 5].

rubber (SBR) [9], and poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) [10–12].

**Figure 1.** The reaction epoxidation of natural rubber.

Electrostatic spinning orelectrospinning is a unique process to prepare electrospun fibers with diameters in the range of micrometers to nanometers that depends on the type of poly‐ mer and processing conditions [13, 14].

Electrospinning is the process that occurred over 60 years. In the year 1934, Formhals was a patented process and used as electrical instruments in synthetic fibers [15]. In the year 1969, Taylor published work describing the phenomena occurring at the time. Polymer solution is ejected from a metal needle at high‐voltage power supply. As the electrostatic charge on the droplet overcomes the surface tension, the low‐molecular‐weight fluid breaks up into small droplets, named a Taylor cone [16].

The basic principles of electrospinning are very simple. There are mainly three components to fulfill the process as follows: a high‐voltage power supply, a syringe with a metal needle, and a collector. The polymer solution with surface tensionis encapsulated within a syringe, forming a hemispherical drop at the end of the capillary tip which is connected to an anode that connects to a high‐voltage power supply, usually between 5 and 30 kV, which supports the ejection of a liquid jet followed by solvent evaporation as the jet travels through the air leaving behind ultrafine polymer fibers collected on a grounded cathode‐connected metal‐ lic collector. The interaction between the liquid jet surface and external electric field is the cause of bending or a spiral track of the liquid jet which not only resulted in the electros‐ pinning jet being elongated up to ultrafine fibers but also randomly deposited nonwoven electrospun mats [17–19]. Surface area and pore size of electrospun mats are larger and smaller, respectively, than commercial nonwoven fabrics. So, they are used in a wide variety of applications of electrospun mats, for example, tissue engineering, drug delivery system [20], wound‐dressing [21] membrane [22], and conductive fiber [23].

It is well known that the morphology and size of electrospun fibers depends on various processing parameters such as the solution properties, controlled variables, ambient condi‐ tions, viscosity, and surface tension. With the control of these parameters, optimal nanofi‐ bers can be prepared. Electrospinning parameters and their effects on fiber morphology are as follows:

## **1.3. Solvents used for electrospinning**

The polymer solution, used for electrospinning, usually was prepared by dissolving in differ‐ ent solvents. The solvent type is important on its spinnability both of first and foremost step of electrospinning process. The solvents should have some proper properties which are suit‐ able with polymer types such assurface tension, vapor pressure, and relative density. Thus, the selection of an appropriate solvent system is indispensable which cause successful elec‐ trospinning process [24]. It is well known that different solvents may contribute to different surface tensions. The solution viscosity is determined by the concentration of the polymer, but the value of surface tension depends on both the polymer and the solvent [25, 26]. **Table 1** shows physical properties of different solvents.

The ability of the volatility in the solvent such as reported that study PVC/PU electrospinning by solutions for electrospinning were prepared in a mixed solvent of tetrahydrofuran (THF) and *N*,*N*‐dimethylformamide (DMF). It was found that THF has the ability ofa good volatility and DMF has the ability of a poor volatility. It is found that when THF is used, 100% of the fibershavehigh porosity, and when DMF is used 100% of the fibers are smooth and microtex‐ ture fiber [27].


**Table 1.** Physical properties of some common liquids.

## **2. Fabrication of polymer nanofibers**

There are a wide range of polymers that are used in electrospinning and are able to form fine nanofibers within the submicron range and used for varied applications. Electrospun nano‐ fibers have been reported as being from various synthetic polymers, and natural polymers were electrospun from polymer solutions, such as poly(vinyl chloride) [28], poly(ethylene‐co‐ vinyl alcohol) [29], polycarbonates [30], nylon‐6 [31], polyurethane [32], polyacrylonitrile [33] polylactide [34], and poly(ε‐caprolactone) [35].

Poly(vinyl chloride)is a hard, stiff material with low thermal stability, can be extensively modi‐ fied with plasticizer and thermal stabilizer to enhance flexibility and thermal stability, respec‐ tively. Almost all plasticizers are commonly phthalate ester. The plasticizers interpose between every individual strand of polymer causing breakdown of polymer‐polymer interaction. The polymer structure is modified into more porous, flexible, and with less cohesive structurere‐ sulting in lower glass transition temperature (*T*<sup>g</sup> ). The plasticized PVC behaves like a rubber at room temperature. However, plasticizer can slowly leach out with time anddeform PVC at a lower tensile force. Moreover, the phthalate esters are endocrine disrupters or mutagens.

In this chapter, the effects of electrospinning condition including electric voltage, tip‐to‐collector distance, and PVC solution concentration were studied on the morphology of formation of PVC nanofibers. The physical properties of PVC nanofibers were studied by varying the blending ratio of PVC with polyurethane and PVC with epoxidized natural rubber.

## **2.1. Electrospinning of poly(vinyl chloride) blending with polyurethane**

but the value of surface tension depends on both the polymer and the solvent [25, 26]. **Table 1**

The ability of the volatility in the solvent such as reported that study PVC/PU electrospinning by solutions for electrospinning were prepared in a mixed solvent of tetrahydrofuran (THF) and *N*,*N*‐dimethylformamide (DMF). It was found that THF has the ability ofa good volatility and DMF has the ability of a poor volatility. It is found that when THF is used, 100% of the fibershavehigh porosity, and when DMF is used 100% of the fibers are smooth and microtex‐

**20°C (mN/m)**

Acetone 67‐64‐1 25.2 233 0.79 Acetic acid 64‐19‐7 27.4 15.4 1.05 Chloroform 67‐66‐3 27.5 211 1.48 Dichloromethane 75‐09‐2 26.5 475 1.33 *N,N*‐Dimethylformamide 68‐12‐2 37.1 3.77 0.94 Ethanol 64‐17‐5 22.1 59 0.80 Formic acid 64‐18‐6 37.6 42 1.22 Hexafluoroisopropanol 920‐66‐1 16.1 269 1.62 Methanol 67‐56‐1 22.7 128 0.79 Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 109‐99‐9 26.4 173 0.89 Trifluoroacetic acid 76‐05‐1 21.9 141 1.48 Water 7732‐18‐5 72.8 23.39 0.998

**Vapor pressure (hPa at 20°C)**

**Relative density at 20°C** 

**(g/dm3 )**

There are a wide range of polymers that are used in electrospinning and are able to form fine nanofibers within the submicron range and used for varied applications. Electrospun nano‐ fibers have been reported as being from various synthetic polymers, and natural polymers were electrospun from polymer solutions, such as poly(vinyl chloride) [28], poly(ethylene‐co‐ vinyl alcohol) [29], polycarbonates [30], nylon‐6 [31], polyurethane [32], polyacrylonitrile [33]

Poly(vinyl chloride)is a hard, stiff material with low thermal stability, can be extensively modi‐ fied with plasticizer and thermal stabilizer to enhance flexibility and thermal stability, respec‐ tively. Almost all plasticizers are commonly phthalate ester. The plasticizers interpose between every individual strand of polymer causing breakdown of polymer‐polymer interaction. The

shows physical properties of different solvents.

**Solvents CAS number Surface tension at** 

**2. Fabrication of polymer nanofibers**

**Table 1.** Physical properties of some common liquids.

polylactide [34], and poly(ε‐caprolactone) [35].

ture fiber [27].

124 Elastomers

Poly(vinyl chloride) with a *K*‐value of 580 was kindly supplied by Thai Plastic and Chemicals Co., Ltd. The solvents *N*,*N*‐dimethylformamide and tetrahydrofuran were used as received. DMF was mixed with THF at the ratio 50:50 and was used to prepare the PVC solutionwith varying PVC concentration for 10 and 15 wt% at 50°C. Polyurethane (Dow Chemical Co., Ltd.) was dissolved in the same solvent mixtures as PVC solution at a concentration of 10 wt%. The PU solution was directly mixed with PVC solution at room temperature.

The picture of PVC nanofibers obtained from SEM shows the morphological variation that depends on PVC concentration and electrospinning conditions as illustrated in **Figure 2** [36]. PVC nanofibers were prepared from PVC solution at 10 and 15 wt% with an applied voltage of 12 kV and various distances between the syringe tip and the collector (12, 15, and 18 cm). The surface instabilities were induced by electrospun jet motion and charge interaction. Low concentration of PVC solution (10 wt%) led to the formation of beads on the fiber. On increas‐ ing the concentration of PVC solution (15 wt%), the beads formation decreasedwith a gradual increase in the average diameter which can be attributed to higher viscosity.

The morphology of PVC nanofiber is modified by blendingwith polyurethane solution at 10 wt% as shown in **Figure 3** [39]. PU blending with PVC smoothens the fiber withoutbeads which was found in PVC nanofiber. PU component can be attributed to higher viscosity and surface tension of polymer blend solution. Viscosity and surface tension play an important role in determining the electrospun nanofiber formability and diameter.

PVC nanofiber prepared from 10 wt% is rigid than that from 15 wt% which corresponds with thermal properties determined using differential thermal analysis (DTA). The nanofiber prepared from 10 wt% PVC has a high exothermal peak at 30 and 275°C, while the nanofi‐ ber from 15 wt% PVC shows endothermal peak. The thermal properties of nanofibers were improved after mixing PVC with PU solution. The mixture of PVC with high PU content gave more flexible nanofiber with a lower glass transition temperature (*T*<sup>g</sup> ) and heat resistance as illustrated in **Figure 4** [39]. For higher concentration of PVC (15 wt%) with high viscous, it is not easily blended with PU solution which led to heterogeneous solution.

The thermal stability of the nanofibers was determined using thermogravimetric analysis. The thermogram of the PVC and PVC/PU blends as shown in **Figure 5** [39] has two obvious decompositions. The thermogram of the PVC/PU blend nanofiber shows the decomposition temperature (*T*<sup>1</sup> ) at 250°C, weight‐loss rate is the largest at approximately 300°C. There are two decompositions of PVC/PU nanofiber. The first decomposition occurs at 275°C (*T*<sup>2</sup> ) with a weight loss of about 10%, which may be due to the decomposition of PVC in the nanofiber. The second weight loss of about 62% occurs at around 433°C (*T*<sup>3</sup> ), indicating that the PVC/PU blend nanofiber has a good thermal stability.

**Figure 2.** SEM images of electrospun nanofiber from PVC solution concentration of 10 wt% (a–c) and 15 wt% (d–f).

two decompositions of PVC/PU nanofiber. The first decomposition occurs at 275°C (*T*<sup>2</sup>

**Figure 2.** SEM images of electrospun nanofiber from PVC solution concentration of 10 wt% (a–c) and 15 wt% (d–f).

The second weight loss of about 62% occurs at around 433°C (*T*<sup>3</sup>

blend nanofiber has a good thermal stability.

126 Elastomers

a weight loss of about 10%, which may be due to the decomposition of PVC in the nanofiber.

) with

), indicating that the PVC/PU

**Figure 3.** SEM images of electrospun nanofiber from PVC/PU blending of (a) PVC 10% with PU 10 wt% and (b) PVC 15% with PU 10 wt%.

The permittivity of PVC and PVC/PU blend nanofibers, which were measured over the fre‐ quency range from 75 kHz up to 30 MHz at room temperature, is illustrated in **Figure 6**. The dielectric constant of the nanofiber, which was prepared from 10 wt% of PVC mixed with high PU content, reduced the dielectric constant due to denseness of PU phase. On increasing the concentration of PVC solution to 15 wt% blending with PU solution, it was found that the dielectric properties were not changed with PU contents due to the prepared electrospun nanofiber membranes that were dense.

**Figure 4.** DTA thermogram of nanofibers from PVC and PVC blending with PU by varying PVC concentration and blending ratio.

**Figure 5.** TGA of nanofibers from (a) PVC and (b) PVC blending with PU at difference ratio.

It was reported that [37] electrospun poly(vinyl chloride)/polyurethane‐blended solutions (10/0, 9/1, 8/2, and 7/3 wt%) were prepared by adding PVC and PU in the mixture solvent of THF/DMF (1/9, w/w). It was found that membranes exhibited relatively high tensile strength (9.9 MPa), good air permeability (154.1 mm/s), and excellent abrasion resistance (134 cycles).

As shown in **Figure 7**, when an external load is applied, the hydrogen bonding between C═O groups of PU and the α‐hydrogen of PVC, and the dipole‐dipole‐C═OλCl─C─ interactions tend to bear the stress on intermolecular levels, resulting in the elongation of less than 6% in the first linear elastic behavior.

#### **2.2. Electrospinning of poly(vinyl chloride) blending with epoxidized natural rubber [**38**]**

Poly(vinyl chloride) with a *K*‐value of 580 was kindly supplied by Thai Plastic and Chemicals Co., Ltd. *N*,*N*‐dimethylformamide was mixed with tetrahydrofuran at the ratio of 50:50 and was used to prepare the solution of PVC and epoxidized natural rubber at 50°C. The vari‐ ous concentrations of ENR solution were added to PVC solution at room temperature. The electrospinning process was operated at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/h with an applied voltage between 12 and 15 kV using e‐spinning machine (eS‐robot®) capable of generating voltages up to 30 kV at room temperature. The polymer solvent was injected from a syringe tip and

**Figure 6.** Dielectric properties of nanofibers prepared from PVC blending with PU at difference ratio [38].

**Figure 7.** (a) Stress‐strain curves of PVC/PU fibrous membranes fabricated from varied weight ratios and (b) a proposed three‐step break mechanism of tensile fracture process upon external stress [37].

was deposited on an aluminum collector plate to form the electrospun mats with a thickness of around 0.1 mm.

It was reported that [37] electrospun poly(vinyl chloride)/polyurethane‐blended solutions (10/0, 9/1, 8/2, and 7/3 wt%) were prepared by adding PVC and PU in the mixture solvent of THF/DMF (1/9, w/w). It was found that membranes exhibited relatively high tensile strength (9.9 MPa), good air permeability (154.1 mm/s), and excellent abrasion resistance (134 cycles).

**Figure 5.** TGA of nanofibers from (a) PVC and (b) PVC blending with PU at difference ratio.

As shown in **Figure 7**, when an external load is applied, the hydrogen bonding between C═O groups of PU and the α‐hydrogen of PVC, and the dipole‐dipole‐C═OλCl─C─ interactions tend to bear the stress on intermolecular levels, resulting in the elongation of less than 6% in

**2.2. Electrospinning of poly(vinyl chloride) blending with epoxidized natural rubber [**38**]**

Poly(vinyl chloride) with a *K*‐value of 580 was kindly supplied by Thai Plastic and Chemicals Co., Ltd. *N*,*N*‐dimethylformamide was mixed with tetrahydrofuran at the ratio of 50:50 and was used to prepare the solution of PVC and epoxidized natural rubber at 50°C. The vari‐ ous concentrations of ENR solution were added to PVC solution at room temperature. The electrospinning process was operated at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/h with an applied voltage between 12 and 15 kV using e‐spinning machine (eS‐robot®) capable of generating voltages up to 30 kV at room temperature. The polymer solvent was injected from a syringe tip and

**Figure 6.** Dielectric properties of nanofibers prepared from PVC blending with PU at difference ratio [38].

the first linear elastic behavior.

128 Elastomers

The morphological structure of PVC/ENR nanofibrous membranes was changed by changing the ENR composition as shown in **Figure 8** [38]. PVC blending with ENR clearly shows that the beads on the fiber disappear as well as the blending of PVC with PU, where ENR composi‐ tion can be attributed to higher viscosity and surface tension with increasing ENR composition. Viscosity and surface tension play an important role in determining the fiber formability and diameter.

The thermal properties of the PVC nanofibrous membrane and PVC blending with ENR nanofibrous membranes were determined using differential thermal analysis; the results are

**Figure 8.** SEM images of electrospun nanofibrous membrane from PVC blending with ENR (a) 0.7, (b) 1.0, (c) 2.2, (d) 3.0, (e) 4.0, and (f) 5.0 by wt.

**Figure 9.** DTA and TGA thermogram of PVC and PVC/ENR blend nanofibrous membrane.

illustrated in **Figure 9** [38]. The PVC nanofibrous membrane, which was prepared from 10 wt% of PVC, is rigid than that from 15 wt% of PVC. The low concentration of PVC solution (10 wt%) shows a high exothermal peak at 30 and 275°C, while a higher concentration of PVC solution (15 wt%) shows an endothermal peak. The thermal properties of nanofibrous membranes were improved after mixing PVC with ENR. The mixture of PVC with high ENR content gave more flexible nanofibrous membranes with a lower glass transition temperature (*T*<sup>g</sup> ). For higher concentration of PVC solution (15 wt%) with high viscous not easily to mixed with ENR solution as found in PVC/PU nanofiber. The nanofiber spun from higher concen‐ tration of PVC solution blended with rubber solution, which was a heterogeneous solution, needs to be optimized based on the electrospinning condition.

The thermal stability of the nanofibrous membrane was determined using thermogravimetric analysis. The thermogram of the PVC and PVC/ENR blends as shown in **Figure 9** has two obvious decompositions, which is basically according to the reported TGA curve. The TGA curve of the PVC/ENR nanofibrous membrane clearly indicated that the blending of ENR with PVC enhances good thermal stability of the nanofibrous membrane.

## **3. Conclusions**

The nanofibers of PVC and PVC blending with rubber can be prepared from electrospinning method. The electrospinning condition with an applied voltage of 12kV and different distance between the syringe tip and the aluminum collector plate were optimized. The blending of PVC with rubber using either PU or ENR smoothens nanofiber and enhances desired proper‐ ties of nanofibrous membrane.

## **Acknowledgements**

A research grant from Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission, are gratefully acknowledged. The author would like to thank the School of Nano and Advanced Materials Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, for supportingelectrospinning machine.

## **Author details**

Wirach Taweepreda

**Figure 9.** DTA and TGA thermogram of PVC and PVC/ENR blend nanofibrous membrane.

130 Elastomers

Address all correspondence to: wirach.t@psu.ac.th

Department of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat‐Yai, Songkhla, Thailand

## **References**


[13] Hong‐Ryun J, Wan‐Jin L. Electrochemical characteristics of electrospun poly(methyl methacrylate)/polyvinyl chloride as gel polymer electrolytes for lithium ion battery. Electrochimica Acta. 2011;**58**:674‐680. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.10.015

**References**

132 Elastomers

10.14456/jmmm.2015.4

S0142‐9418(00)00048‐9

10.1016/S0014‐3057(97)00067‐0

DOI: 10.1016/S0142‐9418(99)00058‐6

10.1016/S0142‐9418(01)00054‐X

S0141‐3910(98)00223‐7

[1] Work WJ, Horie K, Hess M, Stepto RFT. Definitions of terms related to polymer blends composites and multiphase polymeric materials. Pure and Applied Chemistry.

[2] Lyngaae‐Jorgensen J, Utracki LA. Structuring polymer blends with bicontinuous phase morphology. Part II. Tailoring blends with ultralow critical volume fraction. Polymer.

[3] Saowaroj C, Thongchai N, Onusa S, Anyaporn B. Preparation and characterization of epoxidized natural rubber and epoxidized natural rubber/carboxylated styrene buta‐ diene rubber blends. Journal of Metals Materials and Minerals. 2015;**25**(1):27‐36. DOI:

[4] Sadequl AM, Ishiaku US, Poh BT. The effect of accelerator/sulphur ratio on the scorch time of epoxidized natural rubber. European Polymer Journal. 1998;**34**(1):51‐57. DOI:

[5] Poh BT, Ismail H, Quah EH. Fatigue, resilience and hardness properties of unfilled SMR L/ENR 25 and SMR L/SBR blends. Polymer Testing. 2001;**20**(4):389‐394. DOI: 10.1016/

[6] Victor JC, Peter XM. Nano‐fibrous poly(l‐lactic acid) scaffolds with interconnected spherical macropores. Biomaterials. 2004;**25**(11):2065‐2073. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.058

[7] Okwu UN, Okieimen FE. Preparation and properties of thioglycolic acid modified epox‐ idized natural rubber and its blends with natural rubber. European Polymer Journal.

[8] Ismail H, Shaari SM, Othman N. The effect of chitosan loading on the curing character‐ istics mechanical and morphological properties of chitosan‐filled natural rubber (NR), epoxidised natural rubber (ENR) and styrene‐butadiene rubber (SBR) compounds.

[9] Ismail H, Suzaimah S. Styrene butadiene rubber/epoxidized natural rubber blends: Dynamic properties, curing characteristics and swelling studies. Polymer Testing. 2000;**19**(8):879‐888.

[10] Chantara TR. Enhancement of PVC/ENR blend properties by electron beam irradiation: Effect of stabilizer content and mixing time. Polymer Testing. 2002;**21**(1):93‐100. DOI:

[11] Chantara TR, Khairul Z. Stabilization of poly(vinyl chloride)/epoxidized natural rubber (PVC/ENR) blends. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 1999;**65**(1):99‐105. DOI: 10.1016/

[12] Chantara TR, Khairul Z. Enhancement of polyvinyl chloride (PVC)/epoxidised natural rub‐ ber (ENR) blend properties by electron beam irradiation: Effect of antioxidants. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 1999;**65**(3):481‐490. DOI: 10.1016/S0141‐3910(99)00039‐7

Polymer Testing. 2011;**30**(7):784‐790. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.07.003

2004;**76**:1985‐2007. DOI:10.1351/pac200476111985

2003;**44**:1661‐1669. DOI: 10.1016/S0032‐3861(02)00867‐4

2001;**37**(11):2253‐2258. DOI: 10.1016/S0014‐3057(01)00112‐4


**Elastomers for Natural and Medical Applications**

[27] Keun HL, Hak YK, Young ML, Douk RL, Nak HS. Influence of a mixing solvent with tetrahydrofuran and N, N‐dimethylformamide on electrospun poly(vinyl chloride) non‐ woven mats. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics. 2002;**40**(19):2259‐2268.

[28] Keun HL, Hak YK, Young JR, Kwan WK, Sun WC. Mechanical behavior of electrospun fiber mats of poly(vinyl chloride)/polyurethane polyblends. Journal of Polymer Science

[29] El‐Refaie K, John ML, Jessica RW, Gary LB, Jamil AM, David GS, Gary EW. Electrospinning of poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl alcohol) fibers. Biomaterials. 2003;**24**(6):907‐913. DOI: 10.1016/

[30] Krishnappa RVN, Desai K, Sung C. Morphological study of electrospun polycarbon‐ ates as a function of the solvent and processing voltage. Journal of Materials Science.

[31] Hao F, Weidong L, Chyi‐Shan W, Richard AV. Generation of electrospun fibers of nylon 6 and nylon 6‐montmorillonite nanocomposite. Polymer. 2002;**43**(3):775‐780. DOI: 10.1016/

[32] Demir MM, YilgorI, Yilgor E, Erman B. Electrospinning of polyurethane fibers. Polymer.

[33] Yang QB, Li DM, HongYL, Li ZY, Wang C, Qiu SL, Wei Y. Preparation and character‐ ization of a PAN nanofibre containing Ag nanoparticles via electrospinning. Synthetic

[34] Luu YK, Kim K, Hsiao BS, Chu B, Hadjiargyrou M. Development of a nanostructured DNA delivery scaffold via electrospinning of PLGA and PLA‐PEG block copolymers. Journal of Controlled Release. 2003;**89**(2):341‐353. DOI: 10.1016/S0168‐3659(03)00097‐X

[35] Yoshimoto H, Shin YM, Terai H, Vacanti JP. A biodegradable nanofiber scaffold by elec‐ trospinning and its potential for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2003;**24**(12):2077‐

[36] Taweepreda W, Phatcharasit K, Boonkerd K, Kim J‐K. Preparation and properties of elec‐ trospun PVC nanofiber. Advanced Materials Research. 2013;**770**:193‐196. DOI: 10.4028/

[37] Wang N, Raza A, Si Y, Yu J, Sun G, Ding B. Tortuously structured polyvinyl chloride/ polyurethane fibrous membranes for high‐efficiency fine particulate filtration. Journal of

[38] Taweepreda W, Phatcharasit K, Boonkerd K, Kim J‐K. Electrospun epoxidized natural rub‐ ber with poly(vinyl chloride) (ENR‐PVC) nanofibrous for PEMFC applications. Advanced Materials Research. 2014;**844**:507‐510. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.844.507 [39] Taweepreda W, Phatcharasit K, Boonkerd K, Kim J‐K. Electrospun condition of poly(vinyl chloride) nanofibrous membrane plasticized with polyurethane. Jurnal Teknologi.

Colloid and Interface Science. 2013;**398**:240‐246. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.02.019

Part B: Polymer Physics. 2003;**41**(11):1256‐1262. DOI: 10.1002/polb.10482

2003;**38**(11):2357‐2365. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023984514389

2002;**43**(11):3303‐3309. DOI:10.1016/S0032‐3861(02)00136‐2

2082. DOI: 10.1016/S0142‐9612(02)00635‐X

2014;**68**(5):59‐62. DOI: 10.11113/jt.v68.3032

www.scientific.net/AMR.770.193

Metals. 2003;**137**(1‐3):973‐974. DOI: 10.1016/S0379‐6779(02)00963‐3

DOI: 10.1002/polb.10293

134 Elastomers

S0142‐9612(02)00422‐2

S0032‐3861(01)00665‐6
