**Author details**

W. James Grichar<sup>1</sup> \*, Joshua A. McGinty1 , Peter A. Dotray<sup>2</sup> and Travis W. Janak3

\*Address all correspondence to: w‐grichar@tamu.edu


3 B‐H Genetics, Ganado, Texas, USA

#### **References**


[12] Smith D, Baker R, Steele D. Palmer amaranth (*Amaranthus palmeri*) impacts on yield, harvesting, and ginning in dryland cotton (*Gossypium hirsutum*). Weed Technology. 2000;**14**:122‐126

**Author details**

92 Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops

W. James Grichar<sup>1</sup>

**References**

acres

\*, Joshua A. McGinty1

\*Address all correspondence to: w‐grichar@tamu.edu

3 B‐H Genetics, Ganado, Texas, USA

Weed Technology. 2015;**29**:412‐418

Science. 2008;**64**:377‐387

2000;**14**:578‐585

2008;**22**:571‐579

2001;**15**:408‐412

Cotton Science. 1998;**2**:174‐185

, Peter A. Dotray<sup>2</sup>

[1] Wiggins MS, McClure MA, Hayes R, Steckel LE. Integrating cover crops and POST her‐ bicides for glyphosate‐resistant Palmer amaranth (*Amaranthus palmeri*) control in corn.

[2] Anonymous, Monsanto Biotechnology Trait Acres: Fiscal Years 1996‐2009 [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.monsanto.com/investors/documents/2009/q4.biotech.

[4] Owen MDK. Weed species shifts in glyphosate‐resistant crops. Pest Management

[5] Culpepper AS, York AC. Weed management in glyphosate tolerant cotton. Journal of

[6] Johnson WG, Bradley PR, Hart SE, Buesinger ML, Massey RE. Efficacy and econom‐ ics of weed management in glyphosate‐resistant corn (*Zea mays*). Weed Technology.

[7] Burke IC, Thomas WE, Allen JR, Collins J, Wilcut JW. A comparison of weed control in herbicide‐resistant, herbicide‐tolerant, and conventional corn. Weed Technology.

[8] Bradley PR, Johnson WG, Hart SE, Buesinger ML, Massey RE. Economics of weed man‐ agement in glufosinate‐resistant corn (*Zea mays* L.). Weed Technology. 2000;**14**:495‐501

[9] Ritter RL, Menbere H. Weed management systems utilizing glufosinate‐resistant corn

[10] Heap I. The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds [Internet]. 2014. Available

[11] Morgan G, Baumann P, Chandler J. Competitive impact of Palmer amaranth (*Amaranthus palmeri*) on cotton (*Gossypium hirsutum*) development and yield. Weed Technology.

(*Zea mays*) and soybean (*Glycine max*). Weed Technology. 2001;**15**:89‐94

from: http://www.weedscience.com.pdf [Accessed: December 8, 2016]

[3] Culpepper AS. Glyphosate‐induced weed shifts. Weed Technology. 2006;**20**:277‐281

1 Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Corpus Christi, Texas, USA

2 Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA

and Travis W. Janak3


[42] Gullickson G. 6 Points to Remember about Atrazine [Internet]. 2012. Available from: Agriculture.com [Accessed: January 10, 2017]

[26] Correll DS, Johnston MC. Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas. 2nd ed. Richardson,

[27] Light GG, Mohammed MY, Dotray PA, Chandler JM, Wright RJ. Glyphosate‐resistant common waterhemp (*Amatanthus rudis*) confirmed in Texas. Weed Technology. 2011;**25**:

[28] Franssen AS, Skinner DZ, Al‐Khatib K, Horak MJ, Kulakow PA. Interspecific hybridiza‐ tion and gene flow of ALS‐resistance in Amaranthus species. Weed Science. 2001;**49**:

[29] Sauer JD. Recent migration and evolution of the dioecious amaranths. Evolution. 1957;**11**:

[30] Sellers BA, Smeda RJ, Johnson WG, Kendig JA, Ellersieck MR. Comparative growth of

[31] Bond JA, Oliver LR. Comparative growth of Palmer amaranth (*Amaranthus palmeri*)

[32] Horak MJ, Loughin TM. Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Science.

[33] Keeley PE, Carter CH, Thullen RJ. Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer

[34] Franssen AS, Skinner DZ, Al‐Khatib K, Horak MJ. Pollen morphological differences in Amaranthus species and interspecific hybrids. Weed Science. 2001;**49**:732‐737

[35] Guo P, Al‐Khatib K. Temperature effects on germination and growth of redroot pigweed (*Amaranthus retroflexus*), Palmer amaranth (*A. palmeri*), and common waterhemp (*A.rudis*).

[36] Vyn JD, Swanton CJ, Weaver SE, Sikkema PH. Control of *Amaranthus tuberculatus* var. *rudis* (common waterhemp) with pre‐ and postemergence herbicides in Zea mays L.

[37] Geier PW, Stahlman PW. Efficacy of isoxaflutole alone and in combination in corn.

[38] Armel GR, Wilson HP, Richardson RJ, Hines TE. Mesotrione, acetochlor, and atrazine for weed management in corn (*Zea mays*). Weed Technology. 2003;**17**:284‐290

[39] Armel GR, Wilson HP, Richardson RJ, Hines TE. Mesotrione combinations in no‐till corn

[40] Wilcut JW, Jordan DL, Vencill WK, Richburg III JS. Weed management in cotton (*Gossypium hirsutum*) with soil‐applied and post‐directed herbicides. Weed Technology.

[41] Welch AK, Rahn PR, Voth RD, Mills JA, Shumway CR. Evaluation of preplant and pre‐ emergence herbicides in Roundup Ready® cotton. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton

Proceedings of the North Central Weed Science Society. 1997;**52**:81

six Amaranthus species in Missouri. Weed Science. 2003;**51**:329‐333

amaranth (*Amaranthus palmeri*). Weed Science. 1987;**35**:199‐204

TX: University Texas at Dallas; 1979. pp. 555‐556

accessions. Weed Science. 2006;**54**:121‐126

Weed Science. 2003;**51**:329‐333

Crop Protection. 2006;**35**:1051‐1056

(*Zea mays*). Weed Technology. 2003;**17**:111‐116

480‐485

94 Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops

598‐606

11‐31

2000;**48**:347‐355

1997;**11**:221‐226

Conferences. 1997;**21**:784


[72] Anonymous. Crop Protection Reference. 29th ed. Chemical & Pharmaceutical Press, Inc. New York [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://www.greenbook.net [Accessed: December 29, 2016]

[57] White RH, Worsham AD. Control of legume cover crops in no‐till corn (*Zea mays*) and

[58] Egan JF, Barlow KM, Mortensen DA. A meta‐analysis on the effects of 2,4‐D and dicamba

[59] Mortensen DA, Egan JF, Maxwell BD, Ryan MR, Smith RG. Navigating a critical juncture

[60] Riar DS, Norsworthy JK, Steckel LE, Stepehenson IV DO, Bond JA. Consultant perspec‐ tives on weed management needs in Midsouthern United States cotton: A follow‐up

[61] Abel S. Dow AgroSciences Company Petition for Determination of Nonregulated Status of 2,4‐D and Glufosinate‐Resistant DAS‐81910‐7 Cotton. USDA Environmental Assessment 2015 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/13\_26201p\_

[62] Staten G. Contamination of cotton fields by 2,4‐D or hormone‐type weed sprays.

[63] Everitt JD, Keeling JW. Cotton growth and yield response to simulated 2,4‐D and

[64] Johnson VA, Fisher LR, Jordan DL, Edminsten KE, Stewart AM, York AC. Cotton, pea‐ nut, and soybean response to sublethal rates of dicamba, glufosinate, and 2,4‐D. Weed

[65] Sciumbato AS, Chandler JM, Senseman SA, Bovey RW, Smith KL. Determining exposure to auxin‐like herbicides. I. Quantifying injury to cotton and soybean. Weed Technology.

[66] Beckie HJ. Herbicide‐resistant weeds: Management tactics and practices. Weed Techno‐

[67] Putwain PD. Herbicide resistance in weeds‐an inevitable consequence of herbicide use? Proceedings Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds. Farnham, UK: British Crop

[68] Wrubel RP, Gressel J. Are herbicide mixtures useful for delaying the rapid evolution of

[69] Beckie HJ, Hall LM, Tardif FJ. Impact and management of herbicide‐resistant weeds in Canada. Proceedings Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds. Farnham, UK:

[70] Diggle AJ, Neve PB, Smith FP. Herbicides used in combination can reduce the probabil‐ ity of herbicide resistance in finite weed populations. Weed Research. 2003;**43**:371‐382

[71] SAS Institute Incorporated. SAS/STAT User's Guide: Statistics, Version 9.1. Cary, NC,

cotton (*Gossypium hirsutum*). Weed Technology. 1990;**4**:57‐62

drift on soybean and cotton. Weed Science. 2014;**62**:193‐206

for sustainable weed management. Bioscience. 2012;**62**:75‐85

survey. Weed Technology. 2013;**27**:778‐787

fea.pdf [Accessed: January 15, 2017]

Agronomy Journal. 1946;**38**:536‐544

Technology. 2012;**26**:195‐206

2004;**18**:1125‐1134

96 Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops

logy. 2006;**20**:793‐814

Protection Council. 1982. pp. 719‐728

USA: SAS Institute; 2007. p. 204

resistance? A case study. Weed Technology. 1994;**8**:635‐648

British Crop Protection Council; 2001. pp. 747‐754

dicamba drift. Weed Technology. 2009;**23**:503‐506


[103] Sprague CL, Kells JJ, Penner D. Weed control and corn (*Zea mays*) tolerance from soil‐ applied RPA 201772. Weed Technology. 1999;**13**:713‐725

[88] Prostko EP, Grey TL, Davis JW. Texas panicum (*Panicum texanum*) control in irrigated field corn (*Zea mays*) with foramsulfuron, glyphosate, nicosulfuron, and pendimeth‐

[89] Lamore D, Simkins G, Watteyne K, Allen J. Weed control programs with tembotrione in

[90] Dalley CD, Bernards ML, Kells JJ. Effect of weed removal and row spacing on soil

[91] Gower SA, Loux MM, Cardina J, Harrison SK, Sprankle PL, Probst NJ, et al. Effect of postemergence glyphosate application timing on weed control and grain yield in glyphosate‐resistant corn: Results of a 2‐yr multistate study. Weed Technology.

[92] Norsworthy JK, Burgos NR, Oliver LR. Differences in weed tolerance to glyphosate

[93] Shaw DR, Arnold JC. Weed control from herbicide combinations with glyphosate.

[94] Starke RJ, Oliver LR. Interaction of glyphosate with chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazetha‐

[95] Culpepper AS, Gimenez AE, York AC, Batts RB, Wilcut JW. Morningglory (*Ipomoea* spp.) and large crabgrass (*Digitaria sanguinalis*) control with glyphosate and 2,4‐DB mixtures

[96] Norsworthy JK, Oliver LR. Effect of irrigation, soybean (*Glycine max*) density, and glyphosate on hemp sesbania (*Sesbania exaltata*) and pitted morningglory (*Ipomoea lacu‐*

[97] Reedy KN, Whiting K. Weed control and economic comparisons of glyphosate‐resis‐ tant, sulfonylurea‐tolerant, and conventional soybean (*Glycine max*) systems. Weed

[98] Bararpour MT, Oliver LR, Bell CG. Comparison of HPPD inhibitors for weed control programs in corn. Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. 2011;**64**:16 [99] Grier PW, Stahlman PW. EXP 31130A efficacy and corn (*Zea mays*) response in western

[100] Knezevic SZ, Sikkema PH, Tardif F, Hamill AS, Chandler K, Swanton CJ. Biologically effective dose and selectivity of isoxaflutole for preemergence weed control in corn (*Zea* 

[101] O'Sullivan J, Thomas RJ, Sikkema PH. Sweet corn (*Zea mays*) cultivar sensitivity to RPA

[102] Sikkema PH, Knezevic SZ, Hamil AS, Tardif F, Swanton CJ. Biologically effective dose and selectivity for SAN 1269H for weed control in corn (*Zea mays* L.). Weed Technology.

in glyphosate resistant soybean (*Glycine max*). Weed Technology. 2001;**15**:56‐61

corn. Proceedings of the North Central Weed Science Society. 2006;**61**:119

moisture in corn (*Zea mays*). Weed Technology. 2006;**20**:399‐409

involve different mechanisms. Weed Technology. 2001;**15**:725‐731

*nosa*) interference with soybean. Weed Technology. 2002;**16**:7‐17

pyr, and sulfentrazone. Weed Science. 1998;**46**:652‐660

alin. Weed Technology. 2006;**20**:961‐964

2003;**17**:821‐828

98 Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops

Weed Technology. 2002;**16**:1‐6

Technology. 2000;**14**:204‐211

1999;**13**:283‐289

Kansas. Weed Technology. 1999;**13**:404‐410

*mays* L.). Weed Technology. 1998;**12**:670‐676

201772. Weed Technology. 2001;**15**:332‐336


**Provisional chapter**
