**Author details**

**Section/topic # Checklist item Reported on** 

of studies, if done, including measures of consistency (e.g., I2

the cumulative evidence (e.g., publication bias, selective

or subgroup analyses, meta-regression), if done, indicating

included in the review, with reasons for exclusions at each

extracted (e.g., study size, PICOS, follow-up period) and

each study: (a) simple summary data for each intervention group (b) effect estimates and confidence intervals, ideally

confidence intervals and measures of consistency.

subgroup analyses, meta-regression [see Item 16]).

evidence for each main outcome; consider their relevance to key groups (e.g., healthcare providers, users, and policy

of bias), and at review-level (e.g., incomplete retrieval of

of other evidence, and implications for future research.

other support (e.g., supply of data); role of funders for the

From: Moher et al. [50]. For more information, visit: www.prisma-statement.org. NR: not reported. NA: not applicable.

Synthesis of results 14 Describe the methods of handling data and combining results

for each meta-analysis.

reporting within studies).

which were pre-specified.

Study selection 17 Give numbers of studies screened, assessed for eligibility, and

Study characteristics 18 For each study, present characteristics for which data were

provide the citations.

Risk of bias within studies 19 Present data on risk of bias of each study and, if available,

Results of individual studies 20 For all outcomes considered (benefits or harms), present, for

Risk of bias across studies 22 Present results of any assessment of risk of bias across studies

Additional analysis 23 Give results of additional analyses, if done (e.g., sensitivity or

Summary of evidence 24 Summarize the main findings including the strength of

Limitations 25 Discuss limitations at study and outcome level (e.g., risk

Conclusions 26 Provide a general interpretation of the results in the context

Funding 27 Describe sources of funding for the systematic review and

systematic review.

identified research, reporting bias).

makers).

with a forest plot.

Synthesis of results 21 Present results of each meta-analysis done, including

(see Item 15).

stage, ideally with a flow diagram.

any outcome level assessment (see item 12).

Additional analyses 16 Describe methods of additional analyses (e.g., sensitivity

**RESULTS**

66 Socialization - A Multidimensional Perspective

**DISCUSSION**

**FUNDING**

Risk of bias across studies 15 Specify any assessment of risk of bias that may affect

**page #**

4

4

4

4, 5

4, 5

4, 5

4, 5

NR

5–8

5–8

4, 10 S1 Appendix

8–10

NA

10, S1 Appendix

)

Senay Kocakoyun1 \* and Fezile Ozdamli2

\*Address all correspondence to: senaykocakoyun@aydin.edu.tr

1 Anadolu BIL Vocational School of Higher Education, Computer Programming Department, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey

2 Computer Education and Instructional Technology (CEIT) Department, Near East University, Northern Cyprus
