**7. Conclusion**

culture is reflected by many of them as negative for development factor, while nature is perceived only on the emotional level and does not cause negative emotions. Language by majority of respondents was identified with culture and regarded as the important component of their native culture. Although many teenagers do not know well enough their native language (Komi, German), the main factor determining ethnic identity is precisely their native language, as they say that they are not Russians (thou speak mainly Russian)

As a whole majority of teenagers appreciate two to three languages (Russian, English, Komi, German) and both native and world culture. Positive is the fact that the number of responses

reflecting a negative attitude towards foreign culture and languages is decreasing.

but Komi and Germans.

**Figure 6.** My culture hinders me.

**Figure 5.** My culture helps me.

30 Socialization - A Multidimensional Perspective

Our material shows that the current situation of transitivity, which includes the variability, uncertainty and plurality of social and personal spaces and contexts, for many teenagers becomes a crisis and complex life situation that significantly reduces their socialization potential.

We can state that one of the most disturbing fact related to transitivity is that it leads to a significant weakening of the desire for dominance, activity and responsibility for one's actions and increasing conformism. This can adversely affect the further social activity of young people, and their creative and personal growth.

[2] Martsinkovskaya T. Modern psychology: Challengers of transitivity. Psychological

Socialization in Modern Transitive World http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74237 33

[3] Yurevich A. Aggressiveness in the modern Russian society as a psychological problem.

[4] Andreeva G, Donchov A, Bazarov T. Social Psychology in the Modern World. Moscow:

[5] Belinskaya EP. People in a Changing World: Socio-Psychological Perspective. Moscow:

[6] Belinskaya EP, Dubovskaya EM. Variability and constancy as factors of socialization.

[8] Helkama K, Pohjanhemo E. Reflections on values and social instability. In: Constant in

[12] Harre R. Metaphysics and methodology: Some recommendations for psycho-social studies. In: Social Psychology: Self-Reflection of Marginality. Moscow: UNION RAN; 1995

[13] Habermas J. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Moscow: Ves mir - Whole world;

[14] Khuzeeva G. Social identity of adolescents and youths in terms of transitivity. Psycho-

[15] Andreeva GM. Presentation of identity in the context of the interaction. Psychological

[17] Martsinkivskaya T, Khuzeeva G. Identity and Socialization in Contemporary World.

[16] Shpet G. Philosophy and Psychology of Culture. Moscow: Nauka; 2007

[7] Castells M. Information Era: Economy, Society and Culture. Moscow: HSE; 2000

[11] Berger P, Lukman T. The Social Construction of Reality. Moscow: Medium; 1995

an Uncertain and Changing World. Moscow: MGU; 2009

[9] Bauman Z. The Idealized Society. Moscow: Logos; 2002 [10] Bauman Z. Liquid Modernity. Saint-Peterburg: Piter; 2008

Studies. 2015;**8**(42):1

Aspec-Press; 2002

Prometheus; 2005

2003

Psychological Journal. 2014;**35**(3):68-77

Psychological Studies. 2009;**5**(7):5

logical Studies. 2016;**9**(46):9

Studies. 2012;**5**(26):1

Moscow: MPGU; 2015

As we see, one of the leading trends of transitivity in adolescence is the 'weakening' of the criteria for behavior assessing and value orientations. It is also very negative for positive socialization fact, because it is connected with ambivalent situation of increasing positive attitudes towards schoolmates and a desire for group socialization and a fall of the orientation towards interaction with them.

Our materials released another worrying fact—the reluctance of many young people to live in a multicultural society. They are not yet aware of the global appearance of multicultural space and are not ready for life in a new situation. We suppose that because of this fact, in small mono-ethnic settlements, the attitude to the country and culture is more emotionally saturated and positive than in cities and, especially, megacities. And the most disturbing fact is the pronounced ethnocentrism presented in the answers of a large number of respondents regardless of their place of residence.

The optimistic fact, concerning the role of culture in positive socialization, is that language, which is not even a priority, emotionally remains the leading parameter of ethnic identity, even if it does not correspond with the sociocultural identity. So we can say that multifaceted socio-cultural identity is a predominantly constructive moment. It increases tolerance for uncertainty and socialization in a multicultural environment.

In the future, the study of positive socialization in transitivity can be continued in two directions—monitoring the socialization of adolescents and young people from different social and territorial groups and expanding research to other areas of coexistence of different ethnic groups (Karelia and Tatarstan).
